Global Demand Generation at GetAccept | Paid Ads & Growth Advisor | Prove the impact of running LinkedIn Ads by identifying influenced deals and revenue with Fibbler 🦁

Hey! 

I’m Adam. Dad, marketer, and full-time founder.

Right now, I’m building Fibbler, the future of Paid Ads Attribution for SMBs. We’ve grown to 400+ paying customers in our first 20 months, fully bootstrapped.

If you’re into LinkedIn Ads, founder-led growth, brand building, or just want to see me try to build this company without external capital while competing with VC giants, follow along here on LinkedIn.

Adam Holmgren

Every time I go to an event like LinkedIn for Marketing's B2Believe, it hits me again. LinkedIn is the most powerful B2B platform in the world.

Nothing else even comes close.

And I don’t say that because I run an attribution tool for LinkedIn Ads.

I say it because every day I see how it works in real life.

The people here already know your brand.

They’ve seen your posts.
They’ve watched your ads.
They already trust you before any sales call even starts.

You can’t get that on any other platform in B2B.

The combination of targeting, mindset, intent and professional context is something you can’t recreate. 

That’s why I always tell companies to stop treating LinkedIn like a direct response channel and start treating it like the place where trust is built.

If you show up here consistently.
If you mix paid and organic.
If you focus on value instead of tricks.
…you will win.

Being here, meeting people who already knew Fibbler before we even talked… it reminded me why I love this platform so much.

Here’s a small clip from an interview I did.

#B2Believe #linkedin #linkedinads

Co-founder & CEO at Fibbler | Building the future of Paid Ads Attribution for SMBs | 10+ years in B2B marketing

I’ve been invited to LinkedIn’s HQ in San Francisco to come down and film some content. 🥹🥹🥹

Honestly, I don’t even know where to start with this one.

Over the last few years I’ve been fortunate enough to do some really cool things in the B2B world.

But the way 2026 has started… wtf?? 🤣

You all know how passionate I am about LinkedIn Ads, and that was the reason Fibbler was created in the first place.

But this isn’t about that.

This is about founder-led growth.

I’m there to share learnings from building a company on LinkedIn with other startup founders and marketers.

And honestly, this is something that came very naturally once I started building in public.

I was very fortunate to already have spent a few years building a relevant audience on LinkedIn, and that became the start for the founder-led playbook I’m running today.

What’s still crazy to me is how often I hear this during demos or support tickets:

“Wow, I didn’t realize I would get to speak directly with the founder.”

There’s real power in that.

Especially when, like me, you’re a marketer selling to marketers (so basically selling to someone just like yourself)

So yeah, as you might understand, I’m insanely excited about this trip taking place between February 23rd and 26th.

And yes, a dream I’ve had for years has been to visit the tech mecca that is the Bay Area.

Now I finally get to do it with a real purpose.

Ruby James & Emma Heiden, I won’t let you down!!

PINCH MY ARM.

2026 HERE WE GO.

We launched Fibbler in April 2024 with just $2,500 of our own money.

Our first paying customer came the same month, and I still remember it like it was yesterday.

By September 2024 we had reached 50 customers, and by December 2024 we hit 100 customers and $10,000 in MRR.

At that point we were still running everything on the side of our full-time jobs, squeezing in work during evenings, weekends, and whatever time we could find.

By the time July 2025 came around, we had reached 250 customers and $27,000 in MRR.

That’s when our CTO decided to go all in on Fibbler full time, and honestly, everything changed from there.

We were suddenly shipping features much faster, fixing issues quickly, and supporting our customers in minutes instead of hours.

And people noticed.

Customers started writing about Fibbler without us asking, and we somehow ended up right in the middle of this wave of signal-based tools that started to take off.

At some point even LinkedIn noticed us, and saw Fibbler as a great fit for their SMB customer base, which led to us becoming an official marketing partner in the attribution category.

At that point, it felt like things were just moving on their own.

Maybe this was the product-market fit we’d been looking for?

Around that time I began thinking seriously about going full time myself, and what could happen if we both focused fully on Fibbler.

Six months later, here we are.

Both co-founders are now working on Fibbler full time, we’re at 400+ paying customers, and we’ve just crossed $50,000 in MRR.

2024 was about proving that Fibbler solves a real problem.
2025 was about finding our first true product-market fit.
2026 will be about building a multi-channel product and scaling our GTM properly, with me now fully focused on this journey.

To say that I’m excited would be a massive understatement.

𝗙𝗜𝗕𝗕𝗟𝗘𝗥 𝗜𝗦 𝗚𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗢 𝗡𝗬𝗖 🇺🇸🗽

A bit surreal to even write this.

New York is actually the city where we have the most Fibbler customers in the world (!!)

Which still feels a bit crazy.

We’re heading over partly to join the Annual Summit for LinkedIn Marketing Partners, but also to meet customers and hang out with as many great marketers as possible.

𝗪𝗲’𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗬𝗖 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟭𝟬𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝟭𝟯𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵.

So a few questions to my network..

Who’s up for grabbing a coffee and talking marketing, LinkedIn Ads, and startup growth?

Who might want to host two slightly lost co-founders in their office for a day?

And the most important question of all…

Who wants a pink lion? 🦁

We’ll pack one for anyone that reaches out.

See you soon, NYC.

Last week was the biggest challenge I’ve had since becoming a full-time founder.

The kind of thing you dread the most.

𝐀𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭.

Both my kids (1.5 and 4 years old) got the flu.

High fevers up to 40°C (104°F).

And it just kept going all week.

I started feeling symptoms myself, but we decided I’d stay home with the kids the first half of the week, and my partner would take the second.

Those first 2.5 days were the longest of my life. 😅

Trying to squeeze in support replies during naps.

Then I finally made it into the office.

And that’s when my partner started getting sick too.

Suddenly I felt extremely guilty for being away, even though I needed a few focused hours to keep the business moving. 

In the end, I stayed home on Friday as well to help out.

This is the reality of being a full-time founder and a parent to two small kids.

But we’re on the other side now.

The kids are back at daycare.

We’re both healthy again.

P.S. It’s usually not this messy at home… but we were in full survival mode. 😅

We’re FINALLY starting to show up in relevant AI overviews and LLM queries 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝘁.

As you probably know by now, I’ve never been super passionate about SEO. 

So towards the end of last year we brought in Sam Dunning and his team at Breaking B2B.

With everything going on as a solo marketer, and everything else I do 😅, I needed help with execution.

Luckily, we already had a really solid domain rating from the start. 

So there was a lot of potential in climbing rankings and showing up on the right queries quickly.

WHERE DID WE START

Pretty early on it was clear that we needed to show up more with the right context next to the bigger players in the attribution category.

The good thing is that over the last few years I’ve used most of these platforms myself. 

That makes it much easier to do an honest comparison.

That part matters a lot to me.

I want to talk about all these players in a respectful way. 

I admire them a lot (especially Dreamdata and how they carry themselves with so much grace).

But at the same time I wanted it to be very clear where Fibbler stands in relation to them, no matter when or where people are looking.

So I started by just dumping all my thoughts and knowledge into a Google Doc.

The team at Breaking B2B then did their own research and started writing the actual content.

After that, I spent a lot of time on each piece editing it. Making sure it matched my POV and actually sounded like me.

RESULTS SO FAR

We’ve pretty quickly started showing up in the AI queries we listed in the initial plan.

Not always as the first option. But always with the right narrative. That we’re a LinkedIn first attribution software for companies that believe that’s enough.

Our organic traffic has already 2x’d in the last two months, excluding brand.

But the most important part is this.

Now that I’ve started taking more demo calls, people have mentioned several times that they’ve read this narrative and they understand exactly where we stand compared to the others.

And that’s the whole point right now.

It’s time to announce our second influencer and this time it’s one of the brightest LinkedIn Ads voices in Europe.

Over the last 15 months, we’ve had incredible people openly sharing how they use Fibbler without ever getting anything in return.

At the same time, as we’ve grown, I’ve always known we wanted to create something more formal. 

A way to give back to those people while also helping their ideas and experiences reach a wider audience.

In other words, a small influencer program.

Last week, we announced our first US-focused influencer.

Now it’s time to announce our second influencer to get better coverage of the European market.

And without further ado…

🥁🥁🥁

Please welcome Philip Ilic to the Fibbler troops.

They’ve been using Fibbler at scale for his agency 𝐊𝐢𝐢𝐧 and have already shared some great content showing how it fits into their workflows and reporting.

But most importantly, the transparent way Philip shares LinkedIn Ads playbooks with the world, without making them overly complex, is something I really align with. 

That’s one of the main reasons I started following him in the first place.

Stay tuned for early results and additional roster introductions!

I lied to everyone.



I told you that I would never run brand ads on Google for Fibbler…

Because you’re basically paying for traffic that would find you anyway.

That was my belief.

Until last week…

For some random reason, I searched for Fibbler on Google.

And to my surprise, I saw two companies consistently appearing at the top of the results.

At this point, I was still determined to not run brand ads. It just felt like a waste of money.

Then I noticed something else.

They were using the Fibbler name all over the place. Sometimes even as a standalone.

If someone searches quickly and just scans the page, it would be very easy to click by mistake.

That is when my mindset shifted.

I spent some time setting up a simple brand campaign.

$25 daily budget.
$2 max CPC.

And I am already at more than 90% impression share. With a really solid top of page rate.

So I will keep it running for a bit.

At least until Google removes their ads for trademark reasons (they have already been disapproved in a few markets luckily 😬).

So yes. 

I lied.

I said I would never bid on my own brand.

Hopefully this is only temporary..

P.S. I’m really proud to say that we now have more than 2,000 branded searches for Fibbler every month, and it’s clear that others see that as valuable.

#googleads #brand

107 engagements.
2,886 impressions.
12 months of campaigns.

The deal?

Attributed to organic search.

Of course it was.

This is the most common journey in B2B:

Someone sees your ads on LinkedIn.
They don’t click.
They lurk.
They remember.

Weeks later they Google your brand.
Click a result.
Submit a form.

Boom.

“Original source: Organic search.”

Perfectly clean report.

Also completely wrong.

That deal didn’t start with Google.

It started way earlier.

With your paid campaigns.

And your organic LinkedIn presence reinforcing them.

Paid created awareness.

Organic search captured it.

They work together whether your attribution model likes it or not.

But most reports still force everything into one bucket.

That’s why we built Customer Journeys in Fibbler.

So you can see:
✅ Paid touches that created awareness
✅ Organic touches that reinforced trust
✅ How both combined to influence pipeline

Not paid vs organic.

Paid + organic.

Because people don’t buy in straight lines.

And attribution shouldn’t pretend they do.

P.S.

Fibbler helps you see which companies view or engage with your LI Ads, tie them to pipeline and revenue in your CRM, and alert sales when it’s time to reach out. Try it free for 30 days at https://www.fibbler.co/.

This is Fibbler’s MRR growth throughout 2025 and what we’re projecting for 2026:

January: $11k
February: $12.5k
March: $14k
April: $18k
May: $20k
June: $22k
July: $25.5k
August: $26k
September: $30k
October: $36.5k
November: $42k
December: $43k

As you can tell, it’s far from linear.

January, August and December were the slowest months for us.

A mix of fewer new paid customers and higher churn.

Then September to November happened.

Around 40% MRR growth in just a few months.

What’s interesting is that nothing major changed during 2025.

Same spend. 
Same channels. 
Same level of activity.

What did change was time.

Brand growth compounded over the year.

We started with below 1,000 brand searches per month. 

Now we’re at over 2000.

To me that’s a strong signal.

That our narrative is starting to resonate with the right people.

That we have a product people actually love using.

Yes, we probably could have grown much faster by raising money and spending more.

But we’re ending the year with around 25% profit margin.

Our fate is fully in our own hands.

There’s something very powerful about that.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲:

At a minimum, I think we’ll grow at roughly the same rate.

Again, brand compounds over time.

On top of that, we’re going to add a few add-ons for other channels, like Google Ads and Meta Ads, which should increase ARPA slightly.

So my guess is that we’ll end the year at…

🥁🥁🥁

𝗔𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 $𝟭𝟮𝟬𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗥𝗥, 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗹𝘆 $𝟭.𝟰𝗠 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗥𝗥.

With only two people on the team.

That’s about $720k ARR per employee (!!!)

Let’s see how right or wrong I am. 😬

Regardless, I’m just so excited about putting my full time into something I’m genuinely passionate about.

#saas #startup

It’s time to introduce our third influencer that I’m genuinely excited to work with.

One thing I didn’t fully appreciate when we started Fibbler was how many smart people would start sharing their experiences with the product, completely on their own.

As the company has grown, that’s something I’ve wanted to protect.

And also find a way to give something back.

That’s how this small influencer program came to life.

We’ve already started building coverage in the US and Europe.

Now it’s time to expand further. 

🥁🥁🥁🥁🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

I’m very happy to welcome Sheila Coque to the Fibbler roster.

We actually first connected in the comments on LinkedIn.

Her replies always stood out to me. 

Thoughtful, authentic, and coming from real experience.

When I later started following her content more closely, it carried the exact same energy.

I’m really looking forward to building something together and starting to grow our presence in Latin America with her.

More soon. 🦁

THE FIBBLER FAMILY IS GROWING


And no, it’s not a baby...

Or another colleague...

I was simply sitting down one evening, thinking about how we could stand out a bit more.

As you do.

How to do something different.

How to do something fun.

Something that could represent Fibbler when we show up at events and meet-ups. 

And somehow we ended up with the biggest pink lions we could possibly find. 😅

They are huge.

Like… way bigger than we imagined when we ordered.

These lions aren’t just going to sit in a corner and collect dust though.

They’re coming with us.

To conferences.
To meet-ups.

To places where a giant pink lion probably shouldn’t be… but absolutely should be.

𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹.

Has anyone here actually tried bringing giant stuffed lions on a plane before? 

Because I’m pretty sure this will raise some questions at security.

Asking very seriously.

Most teams don’t struggle with LinkedIn Ads because of budgets or targeting. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.

If the message and creative don’t connect, nothing works, no matter how much budget you put behind it.

What’s changed recently is how that content gets distributed.

Thought leader ads have made it easier than ever to distribute content through people instead of brands. 

And that matters, because people listen to people, not logos.

But the core question hasn’t changed. 

𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝘆 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲?

And this is why many companies still hesitate to run thought leader ads. 

Not because the format doesn’t work, but because it quickly reveals whether the message is strong enough or not.

At the same time, when teams do get this right, I haven’t seen any other format on LinkedIn that comes close in terms of attention and engagement. 

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗜’𝗺 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟮𝟴𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 Casper 𝗮𝗻𝗱 SparkForce.

We’ll walk through real examples, showing ads that clearly moved people and others that didn’t, and talk through what actually changed the outcome.

We’ll also cover why paid and organic can’t be treated as two separate things anymore, and how that disconnect is often the reason campaigns feel off.

This is a practical session for B2B marketers who feel like engaging their audience shouldn’t be this hard.

#linkedinads

thought leader ads that influenced €3.1M on LinkedIn

You’re spending $5K on paid ads and it works. You scale to $50K and it doesn’t. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗱𝘀…

You know that feeling when some of your paid programs are finally working?

You’re spending around $5K per month.

Awareness is building.
Engagement looks solid.
Pipeline is starting to show up.

So you do the obvious thing.

You scale.

$10K.
$50K.

And that’s when it gets weird.

The numbers don’t follow the spend anymore.

Costs go up.
Quality feels off.

And suddenly you’re wondering if something broke, even though nothing really changed.

That’s the part most teams get stuck in.

At lower spend, you can focus on a few things that work really well and just double down on those.

When you start scaling, that simplicity disappears.

You add more formats.
More channels.
More experiments running in parallel.

And suddenly it’s not about one campaign working anymore, it’s about how all of it fits together.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗜’𝗺 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝗲𝗯𝗿𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟭𝟮𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 Matthis Janssen, Tim Rath 𝗮𝗻𝗱 YOYABA.

This is something you don’t want to miss if you’re scaling paid ads this year.

👉 Sign up here: https://lnkd.in/ehdwxUbK

No alternative text description for this image

This is what my weekly calendar looks like when running a product-led startup. 𝗜𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲.

Most days aren’t packed with meetings.

That space is where the work happens.

Once you start finding some real fit in the market, something changes. 

The product starts doing the selling for you. 

You don’t have to explain every feature or convince people why it matters.

They already know the problem.

One thing I’ve really noticed over the last 15 months is how tech savvy marketers are. 

Most of them know exactly what they want. 

If the product is clear and works well, they’ll figure it out on their own.

I see a lot of startup content that makes a full calendar look like success. 

In reality, being busy and making progress aren’t always the same thing.

I don’t know if this is the right way forever.

But right now, it feels like the right way to build.

#saas #startup

𝗜’𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 $𝟳𝟬𝗸 𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗔𝗱𝘀 in the last 12 months, and it completely changed how I think about what actually works on LinkedIn.

For a long time, we treated paid and organic as two completely separate things.

We ran ads.

And then we posted organic content.

But it doesn’t work like that anymore… and there’s three major shifts I’m seeing right now:

1️⃣ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁

Organic content is no longer a nice to have.

For me, organic is a testing ground. I post ideas, see what resonates, and then only put money behind the content that already works. 

2️⃣ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮

There is so much hype around third party intent tools, while some of the strongest signals are already sitting in your own data. 

When someone has seen your content multiple times and interacted with it, they are more likely to remember you when they are ready to buy.

3️⃣ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗯𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲, 𝗖𝗥𝗠 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘆

People see ads for months.
Talk to peers.
Google you multiple times.
Consume content across channels.
And only then convert into a demo.

And the CRM gives all the credit to whatever happened last (or first).

That pushes companies to over invest in capture and under invest in brand. And then a few months later they wonder why pipeline slowed down…

I go much deeper into all of this in the full video and explain how I think about LinkedIn Ads after spending $70k of my own money on them.

#linkedinads

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿. I made it my mission last year to figure out how to make it work anyway.

Before I get into what I changed, here’s some context.

Last year I reached more than 500k people, generated over 2.5M impressions, saw around 50,000 engagements, and grew my follower base by 12,000 people.

Those numbers look great now. 

But early 2025 was… not that good haha.

My posts slowly stopped getting the same traction. Reach went down, engagement was terrible, and at the same time LinkedIn started filling up with more and more AI content.

That was the moment I realised I couldn’t blame the algorithm anymore.

It was on me to start creating content people actually wanted to read.

So I did something I’ve never done before.

I sat down and defined how I wanted my writing to feel.

I went through my old posts that had actually worked and asked myself a few simple questions:

Why did this post resonate?
Are there any traits that show up over and over again?
Which parts sound like me, and which parts feel too polished?

That process led me to two words that now guides almost everything I post.

𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴.

I want people to feel like they’re coming along with me. Into a decision, a mistake, a realization, or something that actually happened. 

Not just scrolling past another tactic or success story.

After that, I rebuilt my content pillars.

LinkedIn Ads, brand building, and building a startup in public became the three big ones.

Those two changes are what made 2025 the best year I’ve ever had on LinkedIn. 

And a big reason why Fibbler even got off the ground in the first place.

To make it clear.

It’s easy to blame the algorithm.

But if you put in the work to actually find your voice, I’m almost certain you’ll see results.

#linkedin

Generic GTM is dead → Go to my featured section for actionable GTM insights and elevate your marketing game 🔥| Co-Founder of TACK | Creating the category of People-first GTM 👥| 13+ Years in B2B Marketing 📈

I help B2B companies build go-to-market strategies that prioritize real connection because relationships, not just reach, drive growth.

After 14 years in B2B marketing, I’ve led field marketing, demand gen, community, and influencer programs. I know what works, what doesn’t, and what’s changed.

Too many companies still treat buyers like leads. That’s not how modern GTM works.

I’ve helped 35+ B2B brands shift from transactional tactics to connection-driven growth, building scalable strategies, launching communities, running 30+ webinars, and rolling out on-demand models that replaced bloated in-house teams.

Today, I work directly with brands, founders, and marketers to build go-to-market engines that scale—without the spam.

What I do:
→ Build integrated campaign strategies that drive pipeline
→ Coach creators and brands on influencer marketing
→ Design community-led and field programs that actually work
→ Speak on GTM, content, and creator-led growth
→ Act as a fractional marketing leader or advisor

📚 Author of B2B Influencer Marketing: Work With Creators to Generate Authentic and Effective Marketing (Kogan Page, 2025)

👋 Let’s work together: DM me or visit https://linktr.ee/NickBMarketing

Nick Bennett

In March, I walked away from TACK.

A 7-figure business I co-founded. We crossed a million in revenue in our first 6 months together. I'd never seen anything like it in my life.

I also learned that revenue does not equal pay. Different lesson for a different post.

35+ clients. A book. A community. Two incredible years with Mark.

And honestly? I had no idea if going solo would work.

Everyone has opinions when you make a move like that. Some people thought I was crazy. Some thought I'd be back in a "real job" within 6 months. A few just asked why I'd leave something that was working.

Here's what actually happened:

I had my best year ever.

Not because I scaled. Not because I hired a team. Not because I built an agency.

Because I stayed small on purpose.

9 months in, here's what I learned:

𝟭. 𝗕𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗳𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁.

The first few months were weird. No co-founder to bounce ideas off. No team Slack. Just me, my laptop, and a lot of "what the hell am I doing?"

But then clients started coming. Referrals picked up. And somewhere around month 2, I stopped holding my breath.

𝟮. 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲.

I don't want 10 employees. I don't want an office. I want to do great work with a handful of companies I actually believe in.

That's not a limitation. That's the whole point.

𝟯. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣&𝗟 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆.

Yeah, the numbers worked. Better than I expected, honestly.

But the real win? I end my day every day at 4pm. I make it to school pickup. I watched my three daughters grow up instead of watching Slack notifications pile up.

That's the ROI nobody puts in a spreadsheet.

𝟰. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.

I spent 15+ years building a career in B2B marketing. Then I co-founded something. Then I walked away from it.

None of those chapters required anyone's approval. Neither does yours.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵?

Going solo isn't for everyone. Some months are lonely. Some weeks are slow. And there's no one else to blame when things don't work.

But for me? This was the move.

If you're sitting on the fence about betting on yourself, here's what I'd tell you:

You probably already know the answer. You're just scared to admit it.

I was too.

What's holding you back from making your move?

15+ Year B2B Marketing Leader Turned Founder | ABM, Field Marketing & Events, Influencer Marketing & More | DM Me to Learn More

When I was coming up as a marketer, I had nobody to ask.

No mentor. No network. Just Google and a lot of guessing.

I figured it out eventually. But it took way longer than it should have.

Now I get DMs every week from marketers asking for advice. And I love it. But I can't get to everyone.

So I'm trying something new.

Every week, I'll answer a few marketing questions that are submitted. 1:1. Free. No calls. No pitch. No catch.

Whether you're a first-time marketing hire trying to figure out ABM or a CMO wondering why your pipeline dried up, I'll do my best to help.

This platform gave me everything. The clients. The community. The career I have now.

Time to give some of it back.

Drop your question here → https://lnkd.in/eqPW4MD5

I'll tackle as many as I can each week.

Let's see how this goes.

80% of your event ROI happens before your flight takes off.

Most teams obsess over what happens at the event. The booth. The swag. The badge scans.

We obsess over what happens before.

The single most underestimated step? Getting the prior year's attendee list.

No list = No leverage.

That list is how we filter by ICP, pre-book meetings, and personalize every message. Without it, you're just showing up and hoping.

Here's exactly how we run it:

𝟰-𝟲 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁:
Before you sponsor anything, ask for a sample of last year's attendee list. This is your filter...if the list doesn't match your ICP, don't waste the budget.

Once you have the full list, build a simple GPT to cross-reference it against your target accounts. It'll score ICP fit, flag priority titles, and surface insights in minutes. No more spreadsheet hell.

𝟮 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁:
Send a gift. As a former field/event marketer, I always like going with a spa voucher with a note: "Events are exhausting. Here's something on us to enjoy after."

It's not about the gift. It's about showing you get it before you've even met.

𝟭 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝗼𝘂𝘁:
Follow up with specific time slots. "I'll be at [Event]. Free Tuesday 10am or Wednesday 2pm. Where works for you?"

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗳:
Skip the booth. Your job is the meetings you already booked.

At a recent MarTech event, we ignored the booth entirely.

Instead:
→ Asked for a sample attendee list before sponsoring
→ Used a GPT to cross-reference against our target accounts
→ Pre-booked 13 meetings with ICP-fit prospects
→ Sent gifts the week before
→ Co-hosted a dinner with another vendor
→ Walked away with 3 new pipeline deals

Meanwhile, the booths around us were scanning badges and giving out frisbees.

Our numbers across events:
• 50-60% response rate pre-event
• Near 100% attendance to booked meetings
• 10+ meetings before we land
• 4-5 new opps added to pipeline per event

And that's before follow-up even kicks in.

The brutal truth?

Most teams treat events like lead gen. We treat them like relationship acceleration.

The ROI isn't in the booth. It's in the prep.

What's your pre-event playbook look like?

Just chatted with an Event Marketer that spent ~$300k on events & conferences in 2025. I had to ask them which one's performed best 👇

"Well, my boss would probably get mad at me for saying this, but we go by gut feeling.
If our sales reps say it went well, we kind of just trust them lol."

I've watched this play out at dozens of companies. Same story.

Team flies to a conference. Scans 200 badges. Dumps them into the CRM. Moves on. Three months later someone asks what pipeline came from that ~$300K spend.

Crickets.

Not because events don't work. Because the data never made it anywhere useful. Here's what breaks every time:

The badge scanner.

You get a name. Maybe a company. A wrong email & phone number. No context. No notes. No way to remember why they mattered.

The CRM black hole.

Leads sit in a spreadsheet for a week. Half get tagged wrong. Half don't make ever make it to the CRM.

The follow-up gap.

By the time sales reaches out, the prospect forgets who you are & they end up going with a competitor. 10 days of silence will do that.

Your event ROI problem isn't an event problem. It's an attribution problem.

Been using Popl. It changed how I think about this entirely.

Scan a badge or business card with a full name & company. Then it enriches the contact automatically. Tags the lead for attribution. Pushes to your CRM with notes.
Sends the follow-up while you're still on the floor.

Every event marketer I show Popl to says the same thing. Where has this been?

The gap was never the event. It was everything between the handshake and the CRM.

Fix that and suddenly you have ROl you can actually point to.

What's your biggest event attribution headache?

Tomorrow I turn 39.

One year from "I'm in my 40s" and I'm not ready.

Before I disappear (birthday + NFL playoffs = zero LinkedIn), 39 things I've learned:

𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗿:
1. Revenue ≠ pay.
2. Build your network before you need it.
3. People remember how you made them feel, not your title.
4. Titles are rented. Skills are owned.
5. Most meetings should've been emails.
6. You don't need permission to reinvent yourself.
7. Small on purpose beats big by accident.
8. LinkedIn gave me everything.
9. Betting on yourself is terrifying until it isn't.
10. The people who helped me most asked for nothing.
11. Say yes to things that scare you.
12. The loneliness of solo work is real. So is the freedom.
13. Your career is a marathon with a few sprints that matter.

𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲:
14. Your kids don't care about revenue. They care if you showed up.
15. Health is the asset nobody talks about until it's gone.
16. Sleep won. I stopped fighting it.
17. The friends who stay when things suck are the only ones that matter.
18. Time is the only thing you can't make more of.
19. Therapy isn't weakness. It's maintenance.
20. Your 20s: figure out what you don't want. 30s: build what you do.
21. Saying no is a skill.
22. Nobody thinks about you as much as you think.

𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗺:
23. Coffee is non-negotiable.
24. Never trust someone who doesn't like dogs.
25. NFL playoffs AND Pats are back? Rough few years since Brady. This one hits different.
26. Marry someone who makes you laugh.
27. Best ideas come in the shower.
28. Stop comparing your chapter 3 to someone's chapter 20.
29. Your gut beats most spreadsheets.

𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆:
30. I peaked athletically at 17.
31. Hangovers after 35 are a 2-day event.
32. Still don't understand TikTok.
33. Fantasy football causes more stress than most jobs.
34. Dad jokes are mandatory once you have kids.
35. 39 feels like 38. The math isn't mathing.
36. Youth sports cost more than my first car.
37. 9pm is basically midnight now.
38. I've accepted I'll never fold a fitted sheet correctly.
39. 40 is just a number. A terrifying one. But still just a number.

Go Pats! See you Monday.

Chaos tolerance is an underrated skill that only shows up when things break.

I hired someone once with a perfectly linear career path. Great resume. Steady climb. No gaps.

First time a campaign flopped? They froze.

Couldn't pivot. Couldn't adapt. Just stared at the data like it personally betrayed them.

Meanwhile, the person with three failed startups on their resume? They just shrugged and said "okay, what's next?"

Same problem. Completely different response.

The brutal truth?

Resumes don't tell you how someone handles chaos. They tell you how someone handles success.

And success is easy. Anyone can look good when things are working.

But when the campaign tanks. When the launch flops. When the plan falls apart at 3pm on a Friday.

That's when you find out who you actually hired.

I've stopped looking for perfect trajectories. Now I look for scar tissue.

The person who's been through it. Who's failed publicly. Who knows what it feels like to rebuild from nothing.

Because that person? They don't panic when things break.

They've already been there. They know the way out.

Your next hire's biggest red flag might be a resume with no failures on it.

What's the most underrated skill you look for when hiring?

In my last post, I said revenue doesn't equal pay.

A lot of you asked what I meant.

So here are 9 things I've learned running a solo business that nobody tells you until you're in it.

𝟭. 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 ≠ 𝗽𝗮𝘆.

You can invoice $50K in a month and take home way less. Taxes. Software. Contractors. That big month shrinks fast.

The flip side? I run at insane margins now because I have almost zero overhead. No office. No employees. Barely any software.

From April to December 2025, I spent $550 total on business expenses. Five hundred and fifty dollars. I use what my clients have when working with them versus needing my own stuff. I don't even have a CRM haha. 

That changes everything.

𝟮. 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 ≠ 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗶𝗻.

With Mark, we hit $100K-$150k months sometimes. Still felt stretched thin. Growth adds complexity. More clients = more deadlines, more deliverables, more stress.

Bigger isn't always better. Sometimes it's just bigger.

𝟯. 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲.

I don't have a website. Not joking. No landing page. No funnel. No email sequence.

Just this platform. Six years of showing up here. That's it. Oh, and a Linktree, I guess.

𝟰. 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱. 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿.

I've never sent a cold email. Never ran ads. Never hired a BDR.

Inbound just finds its way to me. That's not luck. That's 6 years of compounding. Showing up when nobody was watching so I don't have to chase when it matters.

𝟱. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹.

No one to riff with. No one to blame. No one to celebrate the small wins with.

I miss having a partner to bounce ideas off. Some weeks are just quiet.

𝟲. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴.

Inbound exploded before I had systems. I was taking money and figuring it out live.

Great for speed. Terrible for sanity.

𝟳. 𝗦𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 ≠ 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀.

Even when things are going well, it's hard to sit still. There's always another idea. Another project. Another thing to chase.

Learning to enjoy the win is harder than getting the win.

𝟴. 𝗡𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿.

People ask how's business and expect a number. But the number doesn't tell them if you're happy. If you're present for your kids. If you're burning out.

The life you build matters more than the number you hit.

𝟵. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝘁.

All of the above is true. And I'd still choose this every time.

I end my day at 4pm. I make school pickup earlier if needed. I work with people I actually like.

That's the ROI nobody puts in a pitch deck.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵?

Running solo isn't passive income and laptop lifestyle. It's real work with real tradeoffs.

But if you design it right, it's the best job you'll ever have.

What's the one thing about running your own thing that surprised you most?

Most pre-event playbooks assume you have an attendee list.

You don't.

Unless you're a sponsor or exhibitor, nobody's handing you a spreadsheet of who's coming. So you build it yourself.

Here's exactly how:

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟭: 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 (𝟯 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁)

→ LinkedIn search "[Event name]" and filter by your ICP titles. People post "see you at [conference]!" constantly.
→ Check the speaker list and sponsor list. Those companies are definitely sending people.
→ Search the event hashtag on LinkedIn and X.
→ Look for an event Slack or community app where attendees introduce themselves.
→ Ask your sales team who they want to meet.
→ DM 5 people in your network: "Who else is going to X?"

Target 20-30 people. Not 500.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟮: 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗶𝗳𝘁 (𝟮 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁)

$25 coffee card. That's it.

Message:
"Hey [Name], saw you're heading to [Event]. I'll be there too. Would love to buy you a coffee and hear how you're thinking about [specific challenge]. No pitch. Just a conversation."

Coffee cards, DoorDash, lunch vouchers. Small and useful wins.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟯: 𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗽 (𝟭 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝗼𝘂𝘁)

Short message with 2-3 specific time slots:
"Still on for [Event]? I'm free Tuesday 10am or Wednesday 2pm. Happy to meet wherever works."

No response? One more nudge 3 days before. Then stop.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟰: 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗽 (𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗳)

Skip the booth. Your job is the meetings you already booked.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟱: 𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽 (𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿)

People who showed: Thank-you note + next step.
People who didn't: "Sorry we missed each other. Here's a coffee on me anyway."

That second group converts more than you'd think.

Total cost: ~$500
Meetings booked: 15-20
Pipeline created: More than most $50K booths.

What's your pre-event play?

Yesterday I mentioned using a GPT to cross-reference event attendee lists against target accounts.

A bunch of you DM'd asking how.

Here's the exact setup. Copy it.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟭: 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆

You need two CSVs:
→ Attendee list (name, title, company minimum)
→ Target account list (company name, tier, target titles)

Clean both first. Standardize company names (Salesforce vs Salesforce.com will break matching). 10 minutes here saves hours later.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟮: 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗣𝗧

Go to ChatGPT → Explore GPTs → Create.

In the instructions, paste this:

---
You are an event prospecting assistant. When I upload an attendee list and target account list:

1. Match attendees to target accounts by company name (fuzzy match for "Inc" vs "Inc.")

2. Score ICP fit (1-5):
   - Title: C-suite = 5, VP = 4, Director = 3, Manager = 2, IC = 1
   - Department: Marketing/Sales/RevOps = 5, Ops/Finance = 3, unrelated = 1
   - Account tier: Tier 1 = +1, Tier 2 = +0, Tier 3 = -1

3. Flag priority contacts (4+) with ⭐

4. Output: Name | Company | Title | ICP Score | Priority Flag

5. Summarize: Total matches, priority contacts, recommended outreach order
---

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟯: 𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱

Selling to engineering? Swap department relevance:
→ Engineering/Product = 5, DevOps = 4, IT = 3

Enterprise only? Add:
→ "Exclude companies under 500 employees"

The GPT is only as smart as the criteria you give it.

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟰: 𝗥𝘂𝗻 𝗶𝘁

Upload both files. Ranked list in under a minute.

Pro tip — ask follow-ups:
→ "Which Tier 1 accounts have no attendees?"
→ "Who should I prioritize if I can only meet 10 people?"

𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟱: 𝗔𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘁

4s and 5s: Gifts + personalized outreach. Book before you land.
3s: Add to nurture. Don't force it.
1s and 2s: Skip entirely.

20 minutes to set up once. 2 minutes per event after.

What's your ICP criteria? Drop it below and I'll tell you how to tweak the prompt.

Your CRM is misleading you.

Not maliciously. Just slowly. One outdated email at a time.

I've seen it happen at every company I've worked with. You build a beautiful segment. Launch a campaign. Get excited about the targeting.

Then 6 months later you realize half those contacts have changed jobs. A quarter have duplicate records. And your attribution is telling you stories that aren't true.

The worst part? You don't even know it's happening.

This is what CRM data decay actually looks like for marketing:

𝗔𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗳𝘁.
That ICP segment you built last year? It's not the same people anymore. Titles changed. Companies merged. People moved. But your CRM still thinks they're the same contacts.

𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘆.
When one person has 3 records in your CRM, which one gets credit? All of them? None of them? You're making decisions based on data that's fundamentally broken.

𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲.
You think you're reaching decision makers. You're actually emailing people who left months ago. And nobody flags it because the emails don't hard bounce.

The brutal truth?

Manual cleanup projects don't fix this. They just hit pause on the problem.

You clean everything up. Feel great for a month. Then the decay starts again. Because every new tool, every enrichment source, every signal layer you add creates duplicates, conflicts, and more mess.

The answer isn't more rules. It's a different approach entirely.

You need an identity layer that sits outside your CRM. One that continuously resolves who someone actually is. Merges the duplicates. Verifies the emails. Treats your CRM as context, not the source of truth.

It's one of the reasons I've been spending time in Common Room lately. Open any contact and you see multiple CRM records rolled into one person. Verified emails. Merged identities. It changes how you think about routing, outreach, and trust.

Because if your data isn't trustworthy, everything else breaks.

Before workflows. Before AI. Before scale.

How are you handling CRM data decay on your team?

#CommonRoomPartner

Most B2B influencer programs fail because they chase attention.

What should you do instead?

Pursue trust.

At the DemandShift Summit, I’ll break down 5 Steps to Build Pipeline with B2B Influencers.

It’s the exact framework I’ve used to build programs that turn creator partnerships into actual revenue.

You don’t need more reach. You need the right people saying the right things to the right audience.

Grateful to Logan Lyles for inviting me to share this.  Hope to see you there.

To make that happen, just grab the link in the first comment down below.

taplio

The Battle

Adam Holmgren

Nick Bennett

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreAdam Holmgren's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreNick Bennett's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Adam Holmgren

Nick Bennett

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Adam Holmgren's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreNick Bennett's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreAdam Holmgren's LinkedIn Performance