Product Insights for Emerging Technology

20 years in emerging tech — ex-Head of Product at Palantir, now founder of two ventures.

At Common Sense, we’re building modern agentic AI systems for local government — 100x increases in productivity across critical workflows that simplify civil service and delight citizens.

At First Principles, we help emerging tech companies generate massive value, ship faster, align teams, and unlock product-market fit or hypergrowth — through fractional product leadership and expert product coaching.

Whether it serves 10,000 users or 10 million residents, the system has to work — and keep working.

Sound like I can help you? Get in touch:

adam@firstprinciples.la or adam@commonsensetech.ai

Adam Judelson

A city once invited us in for an in-person working session.

We aligned the agenda, booked the flights, and landed.

Minutes before the meeting while we prepared in a nearby coffee shop, they cancelled due to an emergency.

Most teams would have stepped back and waited for a new date.

We didn’t.

We went to the building anyway, stood in the lobby, and said, “We’re here. We know the timing shifted. We’ll stay as long as you need.” Turns out, the opportunity to get ahead outweighed the crisis.

This should be the bare minimum when working with public institutions.

Show up. Make it easy. Remove friction. Respect their time.

The difference between us and the incumbents is simple. 

We want to have a conversation. 

We want to understand the work. 

We want to sit with the people responsible for keeping the city running.

And we believe that if the government is going to get faster and more effective, it starts with partners who are willing to be in the room, see the real constraints, and prove what they can do.

Building Common Sense (govtech) | Founder, First Principles | Product Insights for Emerging Tech | Ex-Palantir | 4x Venture-Backed Exec

No alternative text description for this image

I just finished one of the most talked-about books in government right now, “Breakneck: China’s Quest to Engineer the Future,” and it made me rethink something we see every day inside cities.

Wang’s core argument is that China became an engineering state, one that builds at speed and scale, while America became a lawyerly society that regulates, litigates, and creates veto points that block building.

The American “lawyerly” model has crucial advantages in protecting individual rights, constraining state overreach, and fostering a flexible, innovative society, even though it often slows physical building. He sees these legal and institutional strengths as exactly what China most needs to import, just as the U.S. should import some of China’s engineering spirit.

Local government sits right at the collision point of these two mindsets – cities need to build (housing, infrastructure, services) but operate inside a thicket of legal constraints and procedural requirements.

Most of the people I meet in government, across agencies, roles, and floors, genuinely care. They want things to work. They want residents to feel the difference.

Both types of thinking and action are crucial to progress, and the lack of understanding from these opposite optics causes the work to drag on, because every decision becomes defensive or about optics instead of outcomes.

Individuals start protecting themselves instead of the mission.

Wang’s point isn’t just about internal dysfunction – it’s about what happens when a society only optimizes for preventing bad outcomes rather than producing good ones. Local government has become very good at avoiding mistakes and needs work building things and taking bold, calculated risks. 

The question is whether we can recover some of that engineering ethos without losing the legal protections that matter to the world’s most important democratic republic.

Every city leader I meet wants faster service delivery with AI. And increasingly, the teams running those services want to deliver it.

But there’s a gap between enthusiasm and implementation.

The same AI doomerism questions come up in almost every conversation: “What if the AI makes a mistake?” “What if the AI misses something?” “What if the work or answer is incomplete?”

These are the right questions to ask. Public sector teams are accountable to their communities in ways that private companies aren’t, with a litigious public ready to pounce on mistakes. Every strong AI company must be able to explain how accuracy and quality are measured, for sure.

But it’s also worth asking: what’s the error rate in your current workflow? How much work is left entirely undone right now? How long are people waiting for answers or approvals under the status quo?

Because in most cases, the baseline isn’t perfection. It’s human staff working through hundreds of repetitive tasks under time pressure, applying convoluted legal frameworks, with inconsistent results.

The challenge isn’t that teams are being too careful. It’s that we’re measuring AI against an impossible standard while accepting a much higher error rate and set of delays from manual processes.

Government operations are excellent at managing long-tail risk.

But managing opportunity requires a different muscle to be flexed, one that involves controlled testing rather than comprehensive policy first.

AI won’t move in the public sector through white papers or policies alone. It will move through small, measured pilots that prove value in real-world conditions.

Transform Your Business with Cutting-Edge Computer Vision and Edge AI Solutions | AI Specialist & Innovator

I’ve built AI/ML products for years, and the pattern was always the same: content chaos kills pipeline.

Ryza Content is the system I created to fix that codified voice, governed inputs, and consistent output without the guesswork.

If you’re serious about consistent, on-brand content, DM me and I’ll show you how Ryza works.

https://calendly.com/ryzacontent-app/30min

With over 9 years of expertise in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, I have a proven track record of building impactful products and driving effective strategies that deliver tangible results. My work focuses on leveraging AI and ML to develop groundbreaking solutions, integrating coding in C#, Python, and other languages to meet diverse business needs.

► Driving Results: My success is rooted in my ability to collaborate with C-level leaders and stakeholders, assessing the suitability of AI to achieve their objectives with a keen focus on ROI. I consistently align AI initiatives with measurable business value.

► Thought Leadership: As a subject matter expert, I share insights through informational sessions, blog posts, and webinars. I recently led a global webinar with more than 150 attendees on the principles and applications of AI, highlighting its transformative impact across industries.

► Technical Excellence: My technical background spans Azure, TensorFlow, Nvidia Jetson, and multimodal AI systems. I specialize in edge AI, automation, and building solutions that integrate image, video, and sensor data for real-world performance and efficiency.

Whether leading teams, advising executives, or developing innovative AI-driven products, I bring a passion for technology and a commitment to excellence in everything I do.

Timothy Goebel

Why does it feel hardest right before it works?  

The pressure always spikes right before a real shift.  
That’s not the universe trolling you.  
That’s your system testing what you actually believe.

When we were building Ryza Content, the stress felt personal.  
Inbox full. Edge cases everywhere.  
Every decision looked like a referendum on competence and risk.  

Here is the pattern I see with founders and marketing leaders:

1) The “signal to self” problem  
Right before progress, your feedback loops get noisy.  
Customer asks for one more feature.  
Stakeholder adds late approvals.  
You start to question the product, not the noise.  
Insight: Treat the tension as a system alarm, not a character verdict.  
Action: Write a one-page “belief doc” that states what does not change for the next 90 days. Use it to filter every new request.

2) The invisible cost of half-pivots  
In the tension zone, teams try to please everyone.  
You water down your brand and roadmap inch by inch.  
You keep “options open” and pay with momentum.  
Insight: Progress is usually blocked by indecision, not bad ideas.  
Action: Define a “no-go” list each quarter: customer types, features, and channels you will not chase, even if they shout.

3) Compression creates clarity, if you let it  
When the pressure peaks, weak narratives crack.  
The product story stops making sense even to your own team.  
That isn’t failure. That is your content system asking for an upgrade.  
Insight: A clear story is an operational asset, not a slide.  
Action: Force a simple spine: who we serve, what we change, why it matters now. Every landing page and outbound line snaps to this.

4) Emotional risk is still business risk  
Founders ignore it, but it drives decisions.  
When pressure feels personal, you over-index on safety.  
You over-approve, over-edit, and under-ship.  
Insight: Shipping cadence is a leading indicator of future revenue.  
Action: Commit to a “minimum shipping rhythm” for marketing: for example, one meaningful content artifact per week, approved upfront by guardrails, not by ad hoc opinions.

The tension right before progress is not a sign to stop.  
It is the system asking, “Are you serious about this direction?”  
Answer with structure, not drama.

﻿#ProductMarketing, #B2BStrategy, #RefreshWithRyza, #FounderLife, #DigitalMarketing

P.S.: If you want help turning that tension into a cleaner content and approvals system, contact sales to explore a structured working session.

Founder & CEO, Ryza Content | AI Solutions Architect | Computer Vision, GenAI & Edge AI Innovator

What did your hardest season quietly build?

The seasons that shape you never feel “strategic” in real time.  
They feel messy. Slow. Sometimes pointless.

Every long night building a content system feels like a cost.  
Time, energy, uncertainty.  
But none of it is wasted if you treat it as preparation, not punishment.

Here is the trade-off that matters:  
You either pay in confusion later, or in deliberate practice now.

Four concrete levers to turn that season into an asset:

1) Turn pain into process  
Do not just grind. Instrument the work.  
Document how content moves from idea to live: inputs, tools, decisions, approvals, risks.  
If you cannot sketch the flow on one page, you are not learning from the nights. You are just repeating them.

2) Build reuse into every piece  
Every asset should plug into the system.  
Ask before you ship:  
Where else can this live? Which audience, which step in the journey, which channel?  
Reuse is how you convert effort into compounding value instead of one-off wins.

3) Design constraints that protect the brand  
The hardest seasons often expose brand risk: off-message content, slow approvals, legal surprises.  
Respond with clear guardrails: tone rules, no-go claims, required checks before publish.  
Constraints feel heavy at first. Later, they become speed.

4) Measure learning, not only performance  
Early on, your metrics are mostly noisy.  
So track learning per cycle: what changed in your system, not just in your numbers.  
Did you reduce handoffs? Clarify ownership? Shorten review? That is strategic progress.

Core takeaway:  
The season that shapes you is the season that forces you to think in systems, not tasks.

#ContentStrategy, #DigitalMarketing, #ContentOperations, #RefreshWithRyza, #B2BMarketing

What no one tells you about building something from scratch

What if starting was the easy part?

Everyone glamorizes launch day.  
Logos, websites, first LinkedIn post.

The real test hits 6 to 18 months later.  
When your content feels invisible.  
Pipeline is lumpy.  
And every metric suggests, very politely, that you might be wrong.

When I started Ryza Content, I thought the risk was in starting.  
Turns out, the real risk was in misreading the “nothing is working” phase.

Here is what no one tells you:

1) Early “silence” is a data problem, not a verdict  
Most founders look at low engagement and assume failure.  
Better lens:  
• Who is quietly viewing but not reacting?  
• What patterns show up in replies, not likes?  
Shift from “viral” to “signal”.  
You are building a listening system, not a spotlight.

2) You must pre-commit your quit criteria  
Decide before you start what “not working” really means.  
Examples:  
• Time based: “I’ll ship weekly content for 6 months before I pivot.”  
• Evidence based: “I’ll change direction only if my ideal buyers consistently ignore this problem.”  
This protects you from emotional, mid‑storm decisions.

3) Make one variable move at a time  
When nothing seems to land, panic says “change everything”.  
Instead, treat it like product:  
• Keep the audience constant.  
• Adjust only the angle, format, or offer.  
Then re-measure.  
This turns chaos into a controlled experiment.

4) Build an approvals cadence that doesn’t kill momentum  
The more your brand grows, the more approvals creep in.  
If every post is a committee sport, you will go quiet.  
Create a tiered system:  
• “Safe” content with pre‑approved themes you can ship fast.  
• “High‑stakes” content that goes through deeper review.  
You protect brand risk without blocking the engine.

Core takeaway:  
The hardest part is not starting.  
It is staying in the game long enough for your system to learn.

#ContentStrategy, #FounderJourney, #B2BMarketing, #BrandBuilding, #RefreshWithRyza

P.S.: If you want help designing a content survives the “nothing is working” phase, reach out to book a short working session.

Are you misreading a season as failure?

Growth is not a straight line.
It is a system of seasons.

Ryza Content Creator hit a wall.
Traffic flat.
Pipeline quiet.
Team tired.

The risk in that moment was not the slowdown.
It was the story I almost told myself:
“This is the verdict on the brand.”
Not:
“This is a phase in the system.”

Here is how to treat a stuck season like data, not doom:

1) Separate signal from seasonality  
Before you “pivot the whole strategy,” zoom out 12 to 24 months.  
Identify:
- What always dips in this quarter  
- What only dropped this year  
Then adjust the content and channel mix into what is actually controllable. You protect the brand from emotional, off‑cycle decisions.

2) Change the unit of progress  
In plateau seasons, swap “revenue this week” for leading indicators:  
- Response quality, not just volume  
- Time to approval on new content  
- % of assets actually used by sales  
You keep the system moving when top‑line growth pauses.

3) Rewrite the internal narrative  
Executives set the story that teams work inside.  
Name it clearly:
“We are in a stabilizing season, not a closing chapter.”  
That unlocks better questions:
What do we prune?
What do we standardize?
What do we double down on before the next spike?

The core shift:
Treat every plateau as a designed part of the growth system, not a verdict on your brand.

#GrowthStrategy, #B2BMarketing, #BrandLeadership, #ContentStrategy, #BusinessResilience

Is your quarterly content plan actually negotiable?

Your theme map looked perfect in QBR.  
Then sales shifts focus. Product moves a launch. A risk lands in your inbox.

Most teams react by bolting on “one more” theme.  
That is how content turns into noise and approvals into chaos.

Better move: treat the theme map as a living system, not a sacred artifact.

Four levers to adjust mid‑quarter without blowing up your pipeline:

1) Re-rank themes by revenue, not opinion  
Take your current map and add one column: impact on in-quarter revenue.  
Score each theme against active deals, churn risk, and strategic bets.  
If a theme does not touch pipeline or key accounts, it moves down.  
The map shifts from “nice topics” into a business filter.

2) Lock a minimum viable spine  
Pick 1-2 non-negotiable themes that define your brand this quarter.  
They anchor your narrative so every new request routes into them.  
Example: instead of adding a new theme for each use case, tag it to the core spine.  
You stay flexible on angles, firm on story.

3) Cap unplanned pivots per month  
Set a hard limit for how many "priority change" you accept.  
Every new request must replace, not just add.  
This forces trade-off conversations with stakeholders instead of quiet overload on your team.

4) Build an approval lane for fast pivots  
Create a lightweight path for time-sensitive posts that fit the updated themes.  
Pre-approved guardrails, messaging blocks, and risk rules.  
You cut review time without cutting compliance.

The core idea:  
Adjust the ranking of themes, not your entire identity.

#ContentStrategy, #B2BMarketing, #RefreshWithRyza, #MarketingOperations, #BrandNarrative Ryza Content Creator

What if brand guidelines actually enforced themselves?

Most teams treat brand guidelines like a PDF museum.  
Beautiful to look at.  
Zero impact on the content pipeline.

The real shift is moving from "guidelines" to "style systems"  
A living set of enforceable rules that every post, script and slide passes through before it hits publish.

Not more rules.  
Better rules.  
Embedded into your content system so humans create, tools assist and approvals get faster, not slower.

Here is how that looks in practice:

1) Translate principles into checkable rules  
"Be clear" is not a rule.  
"Max sentence length, no acronyms without first mention, banned phrases list" are rules.  
If a tool or editor cannot check it, it is not yet part of your style system.

2) Separate non-negotiables from flex  
Lock down compliance, claims and risk-sensitive language as hard constraints.  
Keep voice, examples and narrative choices as guided but flexible.  
This keeps marketing creative while keeping legal out of fire drills.

3) Push rules into the workflow, not after it  
Rules that live in a PDF create rework.  
Rules that live inside templates, prompt libraries, content briefs and review checklists prevent rework.  
The closer to the first draft you enforce them, the cheaper each fix becomes.

4) Make approvals about judgment, not policing  
If the system auto-checks tone, disclaimers and key brand lines, approvers can focus on nuance and context.  
That shortens review loops and reduces "copy-paste edits" that drain teams.

The core idea:  
Your brand is not what you say.  
It is what your content system allows through.

P.S.: If you want to explore turning static brand guidelines into enforceable content rules across your pipeline, Check out Ryza Content Creator.

#BrandGovernance, #ContentOperations, #ComplianceByDesign, #DigitalMarketingStrategy, #ContentRiskManagement

What if your quiet work is the real moat?

Everyone loves the launch moment.  
Almost no one loves the 9 months before it.

Most strong content systems are built in that quiet gap.  
No likes. No traction.  
Just deliberate reps that look invisible from the outside.

Here is the tension:  
If you only ship when the market claps, your brand becomes reactive.  
If you ship when nobody’s watching, your brand becomes inevitable.

Four practical levers to build without applause:

1) Design a minimum viable cadence, not a viral moment.  
Choose one lane: a weekly teardown, a founder memo, a product pattern.  
Lock the schedule in like a release train.  
The win is “went out on time”, not “went big”.

2) Separate creation from reaction.  
Create content in blocks, react to comments later.  
This protects the system from mood and metrics.  
Ops rule: if performance dictates whether you publish, it’s not a system, it’s a slot machine.

3) Measure depth, not just reach.  
Track replies that reference your thinking in detail, not only impressions.  
Save every “we used this in our meeting” message.  
That is early proof of narrative pull, long before scale.

4) Build an approvals path that doesn’t kill momentum.  
Pre-agree “safe” themes, guardrails, and phrases.  
Then empower someone to hit publish without waiting a week.  
Slow approvals quietly destroy more content than bad ideas ever will.

Core takeaway:  
Consistency without applause is not romantic.  
It is how you compound trust before anyone is keeping score.

#RefreshWithRyza, #B2BMarketing, #BrandBuilding, #MarketingOps, #GrowthLeadership

P.S.: If you want help turning silent, inconsistent content into a simple weekly system checkout Ryza Content Creator page.

What if nobody cares about your content?

That is not the risk.  
That is the advantage.

On social, attention resets every 48 hours.  
Your “embarrassing” post is forgotten before your next meeting.  

So the real risk is not being cringe.  
It is never shipping enough to discover what actually works.

Here is a simple content system you can run without overthinking:

1) Start from a theme, not a template  
Before every post, answer three things in one sentence:
• Goal: What change do I want for this audience?  
• Audience: Who is this really for, in plain words?  
• Proof: Story, example, or insight I will use.

That sentence is your theme.  
Everything else is editing.

2) Stay inside your expertise boundary  
If the topic is outside your depth, you cannot safely edit AI output.  
That is where hallucinations become brand risk.  
Use AI to stretch your phrasing, not to fake your field.

Practical rule:  
If you cannot tell whether a paragraph is wrong, cut it.

3) Use “forgettable” as your playground  
Most posts will vanish. Good.  
Treat each one as an experiment:
• Change one variable: audience, angle, or format  
• Note what pulled real questions or messages  
• Learn, then adjust the next input into the system

That is the Ryza Content Creator way who's with me.

You are not trying to be perfect.  
You are training a repeatable content system that sounds like you.

#ContentStrategy, #PersonalBranding, #DigitalMarketing, #ThoughtLeadership, #AIContent, #RefreshWithRyza

Are you measuring content speed or content waste?

Most teams say they want to create content 10X faster.  
Very few ask the harder question:  
"How much of what we post is actually useful?"

Speed without intent just floods your system.  
You get more content, not more results.  
That is the tension.

On January 15 at 3:00 PM CST, Dr. Kruti and I are hosting a LinkedIn Live:  
“How to Create Social Media Posts 10X Faster?”  

We will walk through the principles behind Ryza Content Creator.  
You will be able to apply the same methods with your own tools and process.

Here are four levers we will unpack:

1) Build a reusable decision pipeline  
Most delays are not writing delays.  
They are "Who approves this?" and "Is this on brand?" delays.  
Map your idea into a simple pipeline: input, draft, review, approve, publish.  
Define owners and rules at each step so the work moves without constant Slack pings.

2) Turn scattered ideas into structured prompts  
Your team has raw ideas, not ready content.  
Translate those ideas into repeatable prompt templates: audience, intent, angle, proof, CTA.  
This reduces thinking time per post and keeps quality consistent across creators and tools.

3) Standardize approvals to reduce risk  
Fast content often dies in legal or brand review.  
Instead of reviewing every post from scratch, agree guardrails once: no-go claims, required disclaimers, voice rules.  
Use checklists so approvers evaluate exceptions, not rewrite everything.

4) Review what works before you create more  
Block 30 minutes weekly to audit last week’s posts.  
Tag what actually moved conversations or pipeline, not just what “performed”.  
Feed only those winning patterns back into your next briefs and prompts.

The core idea:  
Go faster by removing decision friction, not by pushing people harder.

P.S.: Want to see this system live and adapt it to your team? Join our LinkedIn Live on January 15 at 3:00 PM CST and bring a post you want to improve.

#ContentStrategy, #SocialMediaWorkflow, #B2BMarketing, #MarketingOps, #RefreshWithRyza

What if quitting is just bad timing?

You are building something real.
The idea was strong.
The team was hopeful.
Now the numbers look flat, the risk feels high, and your energy is thin.

Here is the tension:
You cannot tell if this season is a signal to stop  
or a test of whether your system can hold.

Instead of a dramatic decision, run a controlled one.

1) Shorten the time horizon  
Stop thinking in “Is this worth 3 more years?”  
Start thinking in “What is the next 30-day experiment?”  
Define one clear, testable bet: a new segment, a sharper message, or one focused channel.  
If it works, you earn data and momentum.  
If it fails, you get insight before you burn more runway.

2) Tighten the decision system  
Write down your “quit criteria” and your “continue criteria”.  
Examples: specific revenue signs, pipeline health, or user engagement trends.  
Get approvals before you change those rules.  
This protects you from emotional swings and panic moves during a hard month.

3) Reduce hidden load, not just cost  
Often it is not the work that breaks you.  
It is context switching, unclear ownership, and slow approvals.  
Remove one whole category of tasks this week.  
Free your attention for the one lever that actually moves the brand forward.

You do not need blind faith.
You need one more deliberate step, grounded in evidence.

#LeadershipDecisions, #StartupReality, #StrategicFocus, #DigitalGrowth, #RefreshWithRyza

What if consistency is your real unfair advantage?

Most teams still chase “inspiration” like a resource problem.  
New tools. New formats. New ideas.  

Then they wonder why the content system stalls after 6 weeks.

The uncomfortable truth:  
Your brand grows when you keep publishing after the fun fades.  
Not when someone has a bright idea in a meeting.

Here is the real tension.  
Inspiration feels great.  
Consistency feels boring.  
But only one of them compounds.

Four practical levers to shift from mood to system:

1) Convert motivation into minimum standards  
Define a “non‑negotiable” weekly output: format, owner, deadline.  
Tiny rule: volume can flex, cadence cannot.  
That single constraint reduces risk of stop‑start content and painful reboots.

2) Separate ideas from approvals  
Batch ideation once a week.  
Batch approvals before production.  
When you enter execution, there is no debate, just delivery.  
This protects your team from emotional decision-making and keeps the pipeline moving.

3) Build “bad day” safeguards  
Pre-build a bench of evergreen posts for low‑energy weeks.  
Keep them simple, clear, on-brand.  
This turns your worst days into “still showed up” days, which is where trust is built.

4) Measure consistency, not just performance  
Track: “Did we ship on time?” before “Did it win?”  
Performance improves over time, but only if the system keeps sending content into market.

The brands that win are not the most inspired.  
They are the ones that stay in the game when it’s uncomfortable.

#ContentStrategy, #RefreshWithRyza, #BrandBuilding, #DigitalMarketingOps, #MarketingLeadership

View newsletter: Post It Statistics by Dr.K

Open article: When Einstein Fails Business... by Dr. Kruti Lehenbauer • 5 min read

Is your content system helping or hurting trust?  

Most teams think their content problem is “ideas.”  
It is not.  

The real problem is this:  
Your content looks like many people.  
Your brand feels like no one.  

Here is the tension.  
AI makes content output easy.  
Brand alignment, risk, and trust stay hard.  

You need a system. Not just inspiration.  

Three practical levers:  

1) Decide what you want to be known for  
Not a tagline. A filter.  
If a topic does not reinforce that one thing, it needs extra scrutiny or it stays out.  
This reduces idea anxiety and approval friction, because everyone knows the point of the content.  

2) Build a reusable, on-brand content library  
Store proven posts, visual formats, slide templates, and phrasing that performed well and cleared risk.  
Tag them by: problem, audience, format, and funnel stage.  
Now GPT works inside your system, not outside your guardrails.  
You get speed without random, off-brand takes.  

3) Design simple guardrails for every piece  
Before anything goes live, it should pass three checks:  
• Brand: Does this sound like us, across platforms and formats?  
• Risk: Could this confuse, overclaim, or undercut trust later?  
• Thread: Would a stranger see a clear through-line in our past content?  

The goal is not more content.  
The goal is consistent, recognizable signals of competence and character.  

#ContentStrategy, #BrandBuilding, #DigitalMarketing, #AIContent, #ThoughtLeadership, #RefreshWithRyza

P.S.: If you want to turn scattered posts into a reusable, on-brand content give Ryza Content Creator a try.

What if you could get consistent tips on creating content?
(Yes, totally shameless plug today for my product page!)

Ryza Content Creator LinkedIn page is designed for just that.
Of course, it showcases my product, but more importantly
We use it as a platform to share ideas about the principles of a good content system.

Ryza was built for one thing: turning chaotic posting into an efficient, repeatable, on-voice content system.

As a small business owner, my own ability to reach a wider audience
Depends heavily on my current network showing support for my work!

I know that many of you already have a great content system that works for you.
And the posting consistency that so many of you have, has been very inspiring to me.

But perhaps there are people in your network who don't have a clear vision on posts.
And those are the very people who can use some clarity in how they approach posting.

A simple act of supporting my page can help support some creator's vision somewhere!

Speed vs credibility is usually the constant trade-off for creators and leaders.
You either move fast and go off-brand, or slow down and miss the moment.

If social media content creation is what is stopping you from amplifying your voice,
Follow Ryza Content Creator page to get tips, steps, ideas, and insights.

We also share posts, playbooks, breakdowns, and behind-the-scenes product updates.

Whether you use our tool, or another tool... we want to help you!

P.S.: So, what are you waiting for? Follow Ryza Content Creator today!
https://lnkd.in/giyXRMcd

#RefreshWithRyza, #ContentStrategy, #SocialMedia

Open article: Ryza Content Creator | LinkedIn by linkedin.com

Is your “viral juice” just empty slush?
Everyone wants viral. Few ask, “At what cost?”  
Viral juice feels sweet, but most of it is slush.  
Attention spikes, then melts. Brand trust pays the long bill.  

Treat reach as a test lab, not a trophy.  
Design content as a system: one core story, many angles.  
Measure what stays in people’s heads, not just in their feeds.  

If the algorithm vanished tomorrow, would your narrative still travel?

#brandstrategy, #contentdesign, #digitalmarketingtips, #growthsystem, #RefreshWithContent

Today come join us as we dive in how to create social media post 10x Faster.

If you want to create content 10X Faster,
You can't afford to miss this event today. 

Learn how to create a system that helps.
Yes, our app does all of these for you.
But that's not what this presentation is about. 

No pitch, no sales, full transparency. 

Use your own tool (ChatGPT, CoPilot, etc.) 
Understand how a content system works.
Create Content 10X Faster!

Today, January 15th at 3PM CST LinkedIn Live
Link:

taplio

The Battle

Adam Judelson

Timothy Goebel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreAdam Judelson's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreTimothy Goebel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Adam Judelson

Timothy Goebel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Adam Judelson's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreTimothy Goebel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreAdam Judelson's LinkedIn Performance