With over 15 years of Human Resources experience, I currently lead as the Head of HR at Independent Food Company, leveraging CIPD credentials and an MBA to deliver transformative HR strategies. My expertise spans talent management, performance systems, and employee engagement, helping shape an inclusive, high-performing workplace aligned with organizational goals.  

I oversee strategic HR initiatives, including enhancing recruitment processes, implementing innovative sourcing tools, and designing talent development programs. Passionate about data-driven solutions, I collaborate with leadership to drive sustainable growth, foster operational excellence, and empower teams to unlock their full potential.

Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan

Stop rewarding the loudest person in the room.


Not all productivity is loud.
Not all value is visible.

We’ve created a corporate culture that mistakes "presence" for "performance."
• Some people promote the work.
• Others actually move the business forward.

Strong organizations learn to measure impact — not noise.

Strong leaders learn to recognize silent performers before they disengage.
Real growth is built quietly… by consistent delivery.

If you can’t see the value of your quietest employee, you aren't looking hard enough.

#hr #humanresources #employeeexperience #performance #goals #rewards #people #culture #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

Head of HR | CIPD & MBA | 15 Years Driving HR Innovation | Strategic Leader in Human Capital Excellence, Business Integration & Organizational Transformation

Most companies say they want great talent.


But many reject it… in the first 6 seconds of looking at a CV.

Because the candidate has:

• An employment gap
• No university degree
• Is over 45 years old
• Was once fired
• Changed careers
• Or simply doesn’t fit the traditional mold

And just like that… potential is filtered out.

But here is something I have learned during my years in HR:

Some of the most loyal, resilient, and high-performing employees are the ones who were once overlooked.

The candidate with an employment gap may have faced life challenges that built resilience.

The professional without a degree may have spent years mastering their craft through real experience.

The person who is 45 years old may bring wisdom, leadership, and stability that younger teams deeply need.

The employee who was once fired may have learned the most valuable lessons about accountability, growth, and performance.

Talent doesn’t always come wrapped in a perfect resume.

Sometimes it comes with:

• struggle
• determination
• self-learning
• persistence
• humility
• hunger to prove themselves

And those qualities often create extraordinary employees.

As leaders, recruiters, and decision makers, we must ask ourselves a difficult question:

Are we truly hiring the best talent… or just the safest profiles?

Because when we judge people only by credentials, titles, or perfect timelines…

We risk missing the people who could transform our teams, culture, and organizations.

Behind many “non-traditional” profiles are individuals with incredible stories, untapped potential, and a drive that cannot be taught.

And sometimes…

The person everyone else rejected
Becomes the person who changes everything.

So maybe it’s time to rethink how we define talent.

Maybe it’s time to give people a fair shot.

Because the real talent is often the one we almost overlooked.

#hr #humanresources #hrstrategy #employeeexperiences #talents #business #management #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

The most dangerous HR professional in any company is the “Yes sir” HR.


Not the inexperienced one.
Not the overly strict one.

The one who never disagrees with leadership.

If HR’s only role is to defend every executive decision, even the poor ones, then let’s stop pretending it’s a people function.

That’s not strategic HR.
That’s executive PR.

Real HR leadership means having the backbone to say:

• “This termination exposes us.”
• “This policy will damage morale.”
• “We are about to lose good people if we do this.”

Alignment does not mean obedience.

If your HR leader has never pushed back on you, that’s not loyalty. That’s a red flag.

Because when employees say, “HR is for management, not for us,”
that perception didn’t come from nowhere.

HR should protect the business, yes.
But protecting the business sometimes means protecting it from its own leaders.


#hr #humanresources #strategy #people #culture #leaders #leadership #mamangement #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

Many people love ideas.


Brainstorming.
Innovation sessions.
Whiteboards full of possibilities.

It feels exciting.

But here is the uncomfortable truth:

A lot of “idea people” are addicted to the excitement of starting, not the discipline of finishing.

Because execution is very different.

Execution is not glamorous.

Execution is:
• repetitive
• demanding
• structured
• uncomfortable

Execution exposes your weaknesses, gaps, and blind spots.

It forces you to move from talking about success to actually earning it.

And that’s the part many people quietly avoid.

The reality is this:

Organizations rarely fail because they lack vision.

Most companies already have:
• strategies
• roadmaps
• presentations
• ambitious plans

What they often lack is something far more difficult.

Operational courage.

The courage to:
• stay disciplined when the excitement fades
• hold teams accountable
• repeat the fundamentals every single day
• finish what was started

Ideas create momentum.

But execution creates results.

And in the end, organizations are not defined by the ideas they discuss…

They are defined by the work they actually finish.

#leaders #leadership #management #people #hr #goals #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

No alternative text description for this image

I’m #hiring for an open role. Know anyone who would be a good fit?

Micromanagement is the quickest way to kill a high-performer’s spirit.


I’ve seen it firsthand:

When people feel monitored, they switch to survival mode. They do just enough to stay off the radar. They stop taking risks. 

They stop thinking.

But when you replace surveillance with trust? Everything shifts.

• Survival becomes Ownership.
• Compliance becomes Commitment.
• "Not my job" becomes "I’ve got this."

People don’t fail because they lack skill; they fail because they lack the autonomy to use it. You cannot demand "best efforts" while holding a leash.

People will always rise (or fall) to the level of trust they are given.

Agree?

#people #culture #leaders #leadership #hr #hrstrategy #strategy #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

I’m #hiring for an open role ( Project Coordinator, FFE technical) Know anyone who would be a good fit?

LinkedIn Top Voice | Head of HR | CIPD & MBA | 15 Years Driving HR Innovation | Strategic Leader in Human Capital Excellence, Business Integration & Organizational Transformation

Stop treating HR like a to-do list. 


Hiring, policies, training, and performance reviews are activities.

Building the muscle to win? That is strategy.

The confusion starts because most organizations only value what they can see. They see the interview, but they don’t see the systemic capability that ensures we’re hiring for the future, not just filling a seat today.

The Reality:
HR strategy is not a list of programs. It is the operating system that turns "having employees" into "having a competitive advantage."

If you want to know if HR is working strategically, ask these four questions:

• Can we build leaders faster than our competitors?
• Can we adapt our culture when the strategy shifts?
• Can we sustain performance under pressure?
• Can we mobilize talent when new opportunities emerge?

If the answer is Yes, you have a strategy.
If the answer is "We're still processing the paperwork," you are just operating at the activity level.

The Shift:
Administrative HR protects the organization.
Strategic HR dictates where the organization goes.
The best HR leaders don’t choose one—they master the altitude shift between both. Because in the end, strategy isn't built in slide decks; it’s built in people systems.

#hr #strategy #hrstrategy #people #culture #employeeexperience #humancapital #business #partner #leaders #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

HR is the corporate scapegoat, and it’s time we stopped playing the role.


HR is frequently blamed for problems it has absolutely no control over.

When a manager avoids a tough performance conversation…

When leadership pivots strategy every single quarter…

When toxic culture has been quietly festering for years…

The expectation is always the same: “HR, go fix it.”

But let’s be clear about the reality:

• HR cannot hold every manager’s hand through every difficult conversation.
• HR cannot magically repair trust that leadership continues to break.
• HR cannot build a healthy culture in a vacuum.

The best HR teams are architects. They build the systems, the training, and the feedback loops. But architects don’t live in the house, the employees and managers do.

Ultimately, leadership has to lead. 

We are expected to intervene. But the truth is, HR builds the systems, but leadership has to build the culture.

#culture #people #hr #humaneesources #strategy #employeeexperience #leaders #leadership #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

I used to think high-performing teams were about talent.


(I couldn't be more wrong)

I used to think it was all about:
• Hiring smart people.
• Setting ambitious goals.
• Staying out of their way.

That sounds logical. It’s also incomplete.

Most underperforming teams I’ve seen were full of smart people. What they lacked wasn’t intelligence. It was discipline in how they operated.

If you zoom out, team failure usually follows the same pattern:

1. No trust
• People hide mistakes.
• Updates are polished, never raw.
• Real problems surface too late.

2. No healthy conflict
• Meetings feel “smooth” but nothing real is debated.
• Disagreements happen in private.
• Silence gets mistaken for alignment.

3. Weak commitment
• Decisions get reopened.
• Strategy drifts.
• People execute halfway.

4. Soft accountability
• Deadlines slip.
• Ownership is unclear.
• Standards quietly drop.

5. Poor results
• Targets are missed.
• Energy drops.
• Top performers leave first.

Most leaders try to fix #5. More KPIs. More dashboards. More pressure.
But performance problems usually start at #1.

If you want to rebuild:

1. Build trust
• Model vulnerability first.
• Admit your own mistakes publicly.
• Reward honesty over polish.

2. Enable healthy conflict
• Time-box debates.
• Assign a devil’s advocate.
• Close every discussion with a clear decision.

3. Lock in commitment
• Recap decisions in writing.
• Define success clearly.
• Assign one owner per outcome.

4. Enforce accountability
• Review progress weekly.
• Make standards visible.
• Address slippage immediately.

Performance problems often look like execution issues. But they’re usually trust issues wearing a productivity mask.

#leadership #leaders #management #goals #trust #performance #people #hr #strategy #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

Stop "Managing" Your People. 


We have a fundamental problem with the term "Human Resources."

Think about it: A "resource" is an inanimate asset—like capital, software, or office furniture. You manage these things for maximum efficiency and output.

"You LEAD PEOPLE and you MANAGE THINGS."

When we treat our team members like "resources" or "units of production," we fall into the trap of managing them as if they are machines or systems.

The reality?
❌ People are not projects.
❌ People are not inanimate objects.
❌ People are not incapable of thought and emotion.

The moment a leader loses sight of the human element is the moment they begin to underachieve. You can’t "optimize" a human being with a spreadsheet. You inspire them through trust, empathy, and clear vision.

The shift is simple but profound:
1. Manage your systems, operations, and budgets with precision.
2. Lead your people with heart and humanity.

Don't just manage the resource. Lead the people.

I’d love to hear your thoughts: When was the last time a leader actually led you instead of just managing you? What did they do differently? 

#leadership #leaders #management #people #hr #culture #leadbyexample #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

You don’t have a "trust issue." You have a "control habit."


Most leaders micromanage because they fear the "how" won't match their own, but when you dictate every step, you kill the initiative, you stall your team’s growth, and you keep yourself chained to the details.

If you want to scale, you have to stop being the instruction manual and start being the architect of outcomes.

Try this the next time you delegate—especially for tasks outside someone’s usual job description:

1. Define the Goal: Make the objective crystal clear.
2. Define the Budget: Set the resources they have to work with.
3. Step Back: Give them the space to own the "how."

Your job isn't to oversee the process, your job is to be the resource they come to if they hit a wall.

By focusing on the What instead of the How, you transform your team from "instruction-followers" into "problem-solvers."

If they need help, they’ll ask. If they don't, you just bought yourself hours of time—and they just gained the confidence to own a new skill.

Stop being the GPS. Start being the North Star.

#Leadership #productivity #management #delegation #growth #Mindset #goal #hr #humanresources #people #culture #performance #linkedin #linkedinconnections #aach

Microsoft Security Architect | AI-Enabled Strategy | Building Global-Scale Microsoft Ecosystems

I don’t just build secure Microsoft environments, I design clarity and confidence for teams operating in high-stakes, high-trust environments.

From banks securing regulated workloads, to founders building SaaS platforms, to government teams navigating compliance, I’m trusted to architect Microsoft cloud infrastructures that stand up to scrutiny, scale, and stress.

My work lives at the intersection of:

•	Security that’s intentional, not reactive
•	Architecture that aligns with business, not just best practices
•	Compliance that enables innovation instead of restricting it

I specialize in Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365, Entra ID, Defender, Sentinel, and Purview and I’ve led cloud transformations involving multi-tenant migrations, zero-trust enforcement, and global security posture design.

My goal isn’t to "deliver a solution."
My goal is to be the architect they call when the margin for error is zero and trust is the real deliverable.

Rana Usman Ahmad

Most cybersecurity budgets are wasted.
Not because companies don’t spend enough.

Because they spend without ownership.

I’ve reviewed environments with:
• SIEM fully deployed
 • E5 licensing active
 • Endpoint protection enabled
 • MFA enforced

Yet no one owns:
• Weekly threat review
 • Identity hygiene
 • Alert tuning discipline
 • Executive reporting alignment

Security tools don’t fail.
Operating models do.

Buying more AI-powered security will not fix governance gaps.
It will just create faster noise.

Here’s the uncomfortable question:

If your security lead left tomorrow…
Would your security program continue running smoothly?

Or would it stall?

That’s how you measure maturity.

Security leaders, agree or disagree?

Microsoft Security Architect | AI-Enabled Strategist | Building Global-Scale Microsoft Ecosystems

Many organizations confuse Microsoft OneDrive with Microsoft SharePoint.
They seem similar.

But they serve completely different purposes.

In simple terms:
• OneDrive is for individual productivity
 • Personal files, drafts, and user-owned data
• SharePoint is for organizational collaboration
 • Shared libraries, team access, workflows, and structured content

The real issue isn’t the tools.

It’s how they are used.
I’ve seen environments where:
• Critical business data is stored in personal drives
 • No ownership or governance over shared content
 • Access control becomes difficult to manage

That’s where operational chaos begins.

Understanding the difference is not just about usage.
It’s about data control, governance, and security.

How is your organization handling file storage today, personal-first or structured collaboration?

They had everything.

E5 licenses.
 MFA enabled.
 Dashboards connected.

They still almost had a financial breach.
This was a mid-sized banking environment.

They had:
• Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
 • Microsoft Defender for Identity
 • Microsoft Sentinel

All deployed.
But no one was looking at them properly.

Alerts were stacking up silently.

It started with something small.

A login at 2:14 AM
 From a foreign IP.

The SOC missed it.
Our weekly review process didn’t.

We had implemented one simple rule:
Tag and escalate any activity outside regional geolocation.

That’s when things escalated.
Defender for Endpoint showed lateral movement.

 Defender for Identity flagged abnormal service account access.
 Sentinel correlated logins from multiple devices.

An attacker was already inside the network.
Pivoting.
 Escalating.
 Attempting credential dumping.

One more week…
And they would have hit a core SQL server holding confidential banking data.

Estimated exposure?
~$500,000 in fines and reputational damage.

What stopped it?
Not the tools.
The architecture.

Here’s what we changed immediately:
• Tightened Conditional Access based on risk score
 • Automated endpoint isolation
 • Risky user blocking
 • Correlated escalation dashboards
 • Weekly triage reviews

That’s when the client understood:
Defender alone isn’t the solution.

The system around Defender is.

Security isn’t about more features.
It’s about clarity.
 Coverage.
 Control.

SOC teams, honest question:
Are you actively hunting signals across identity + endpoint + SIEM,
 or waiting for alerts to tell you something is wrong?

Security tools don’t fail.

Security ownership does.

I’ve walked into environments with:
• Microsoft Defender for Endpoint deployed
 • Microsoft Defender for Identity connected
 • Microsoft Sentinel dashboards built
 • E5 licenses fully active

And leadership believed everything was secure.

But no one owned the review process.

Alerts stacking quietly.
 No structured triage.
 No signal correlation.
 No accountability.

Tools don’t protect organizations.
Discipline does.

SOC leaders, honest question:

Do you run a structured weekly review across identity + endpoint + SIEM?
 Or are you reacting only when something escalates?

Most breaches I investigate don’t start with malware.

They start with identity neglect.

Then:
In this carousel, I’ve outlined 5 identity gaps I repeatedly see inside enterprise environments, even in well-funded security programs.
Identity is no longer a support function.

It is the control plane of modern security.

Security leaders, which of these gaps have you encountered?

Most breaches I investigate don’t start with malware.

After 10+ years in cybersecurity, here’s something that still surprises me:

Most organizations don’t fail because of lack of tools.
They fail because of false confidence.

I’ve walked into environments with:
• Enterprise licensing
 • SIEM deployed
 • Endpoint protection active
 • MFA enforced

And leadership genuinely believed they were secure.

But when we looked closer:
• No defined security review cadence
 • No ownership of identity hygiene
 • No clear executive reporting structure
 • No risk-to-business translation

Security wasn’t weak.
It was unmanaged.

The biggest shift in my career wasn’t technical.
It was understanding that cybersecurity is a leadership discipline, not just an engineering function.

Tools create capability.
Clarity creates resilience.

For those early in their security journey:
Don’t just learn products.

Learn how risk moves through a business.
That’s where real influence begins.

The breach didn’t start with malware.
It started with a perfectly valid login.

Here’s what we uncovered during a recent security review:
• MFA was enabled
 • Endpoint protection was active
 • SIEM was ingesting logs
 • No obvious “red alert” was triggered

Yet an attacker:
• Logged in from a low-risk IP range
 • Used a legacy authentication flow
 • Accessed a service account with standing privileges
 • Began lateral movement within 40 minutes

Nothing was technically “broken.”
But identity governance was weak.

This is the shift many organizations haven’t accepted yet:
Modern breaches don’t smash doors.
They walk through allowed access.

Security maturity is no longer about blocking attacks.
It’s about reducing privilege velocity.

If access is permanent, attackers don’t need exploits.
They need patience.

Security leaders:
When was the last time you reviewed standing privileges across identity + service accounts?

One alert.
 Forty minutes.
 That’s all it took for the attacker to reach a critical system.

During a recent security review, this is what we discovered:
• Initial login from a normal IP range
 • MFA passed successfully
 • Service account accessed minutes later
 • Privilege escalation through inherited permissions
 • Lateral movement detected through endpoint telemetry

No exploit.
No malware.
Just valid access moving faster than governance.

What slowed the attacker down?
Not a new security product.

We implemented:
• Privilege review across service accounts
 • Conditional access tightening
 • Endpoint isolation automation
 • Weekly identity risk review

Modern breaches rarely break systems.
They move through access that already exists.

Security leaders:
When was the last time your team reviewed standing privileges across identities and service accounts?

Many organizations still confuse Active Directory with Microsoft Entra ID.
They sound similar.

But they solve very different identity problems.

In simple terms:
• Active Directory was designed for on-premises environments
 • It manages domain-joined devices, local authentication, and internal network resources
• Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) is cloud-first
 • It manages identities, SaaS access, conditional access policies, and modern authentication

Most modern enterprises today operate in a hybrid identity model where both coexist.

Understanding the difference is important when designing a secure identity architecture.

How is your organization currently handling identity, on-prem, cloud, or hybrid?

How often does your team review identity privileges across the environment?

Security teams often focus on blocking attacks.
But most breaches I investigate don’t start with an exploit.

They start with legitimate access.
A recent identity review showed something interesting:
• A service account created 3 years ago
 • Standing permissions across multiple systems
 • No recent activity monitoring
 • Access inherited through group membership

Nothing looked “malicious”.
But it created a perfect path for lateral movement.

This is where many environments become vulnerable.

Not because tools are missing.
But because identity governance quietly drifts over time.

In modern environments using Microsoft Entra ID and Active Directory, identity is no longer just authentication.

It’s the control plane of the entire environment.

Security leaders should regularly review:
• Standing privileges
 • Service account usage
 • Conditional access policies
 • Identity risk signals

Because in many breaches…
The attacker didn’t break in.
They logged in.

Many organizations invest heavily in security tools but still struggle with breaches.

In most cases, the problem isn’t missing technology.

It’s security architecture drift.

Here are 5 identity security gaps I repeatedly see during enterprise security reviews.

If you work with Microsoft Entra ID or Active Directory, these are worth reviewing.

It’s security architecture drift.

They had Microsoft Sentinel.
They had all the logs.
The attacker still stayed inside for 7 days.

What they thought:

On paper, everything looked secure:
• Sentinel deployed
 • Logs connected (Azure AD, M365, Defender)
 • Licenses in place
 • SOC “active”

What was actually happening:

Logging ≠ Monitoring
• No analytics rules
 • No alert tuning
 • No hunting queries
 • No dashboards
 • No one actively watching

Sentinel was running.
But it wasn’t operating.

The incident:

• One compromised user
 • Accessed OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams
 • Stayed undetected for 7 days

Everything was logged.
Nothing was detected.

The real problem:

This wasn’t a tool failure.
It was an outcome failure.
Security was deployed.

But security operations were never activated.

What we changed:

We turned tools into a system:
• Analytics rules (high-risk sign-ins, data movement, DLP)
 • Custom hunting queries (KQL)
 • SOC dashboards (technical + executive)
 • Automation (alerts, ticketing, isolation)
 • Watchlists (VIPs, service accounts, high-risk assets)

The result (30 days):

• Incident response time ↓ 80%
 • SOC: reactive → proactive
 • Real-time visibility for leadership

Sentinel became a security brain, not a data dump.

Most organizations don’t fail because they lack tools.
They fail because they never activate them.

#MicrosoftSentinel 
#SOC 
#SecurityOperations 
#CyberSecurity 
#IncidentResponse 
#ThreatDetection 
#CloudSecurity 
#MicrosoftSecurity 
#SIEM 
#BlueTeam

taplio

The Battle

Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan

Rana Usman Ahmad

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreAhmad Al Cheikh Hassan's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRana Usman Ahmad's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan

Rana Usman Ahmad

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Ahmad Al Cheikh Hassan's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRana Usman Ahmad's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreAhmad Al Cheikh Hassan's LinkedIn Performance