I help founders and leaders build AI products that earn trust, scale responsibly, and keep humans in the loop.

AI, which I call Synthetic Agency (SA), is a great technology in the right context, is a harmful technology in the wrong context, and is a low ROI feature in most contexts.

I've built synthetic agency in products from the ground up, launched ventures in the field, performed academic research and contributed to think tanks, wrote The Ethics of AI, and advised 100+ leaders over the past 12 years.
I’ve learned that, while most people attribute failure modes to technicalities or talent, the true failure is philosophical.

The products that succeeded long term had teams who did not skip the hard questions. They built synthetic agency when they had to, not because they just could. They solved real problems by listening to their customers without chasing trends.

If you're working on AI, with AI or are figuring out how it impacts your work, and want to:
• Build something people actually want to use 
• Think through the ethical stuff without getting paralyzed
• Understand how your brand discovery and promotion should change with AI engines in town

I might be able to help.

I also write for 15,000 people on LinkedIn and for 3,000 on my newsletter about honest tips to make sense of this technological shift.

I'm also launching a monthly private newsletter. Invite-only. For Founders, CMOs, and Heads of Growth who need to control their brand voice in AI conversations (before it becomes too late or too expensive). DM me if you want to get an invite.

🎤 Open to speaking, podcasts, and collaborations—DM me or visit albertochierici.com

Alberto Chierici

Most teams don’t fail from lack of talent
They fail because their strongest people haven’t yet become the high-trust, high-velocity executors leaders rely on when stakes are high.

I help leaders and ambitious professionals solve that problem.

I build the execution systems, leadership behaviors, and promotability signals that turn solid contributors into professionals who:

• deliver fast, clean, defensible results
• operate without noise, drama, or supervision
• anticipate problems before they escalate
• raise execution standards across the organization
• develop reputational gravity with senior leadership
• become undeniable candidates for promotion and bigger roles

My work blends leadership psychology, execution architecture, promotability science, and performance systems design into a single transformation:

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿:
You gain self-propelled talent that expands your bandwidth and accelerates team performance without adding headcount.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹:
You gain the systems, identity, and weekly wins that make your growth visible, sponsor-backed, and impossible to overlook.

I’m the creator of the N.E.X.T → L.E.V.E.L Career Leverage Accelerator™: a 12-week performance & execution system built from 1,000+ hours of leadership conversations and used by senior professionals across tech, finance, consulting, and high-growth organizations.

It delivers what most training never touches:
high-trust execution, promotability evidence, and leadership-ready performance in real time.

If you want talent that delivers without noise, or you want to become that talent, 𝗹𝗲𝘁’𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸.

DM me or use the link on my profile.

Ibrahim Kaizen

Your best employee isn’t burned out.
They’re confused.

Nobody quits faster than a high performer stuck in chaos.
• They can handle pressure.
• They can handle long days.
• They can handle bad weeks.

What they can’t handle is:
• priorities that change mid-sentence
• goals that keep moving
• feedback that arrives after the damage
• decisions delayed in the name of “alignment”

Here’s the trap:
Chaos feels like flexibility to leaders.

It feels like punishment to your strongest people.

I once watched a top performer go quiet before they ever complained.
Two weeks later, they were gone.

Not for more money.
For clarity.

If someone great left your team tomorrow,
what would they say exhausted them most?

Curious to hear, especially from leaders.
This one usually lands closer than expected.

Image credit: Fett on Pinterest

Leadership Performance Architect™ | I build high-trust, high-velocity professionals leaders rely on when stakes are high.

You built a business around your strengths
 and quietly built a team around your blind spots.

That’s the hidden tradeoff of founder-led success.
Teams don’t mirror your talent.

They mirror what you avoid, override, or outwork.

Most leaders don’t see it forming.
- They reward firefighting over ownership.
- Speed over judgment.
- Availability over thinking.

So the team learns to wait.

Not because they lack capability.

But because the system teaches reactivity.

When things feel heavy, fragile, or slow,
it’s rarely a competence problem.

The drag is cultural.

So, do a quick audit...
What decisions stall because no one feels ownership?

Image credit: Patrii on Pinterest

Everyone did their part.
And the result still didn’t land.

Calendars were full.
Tasks were closed.
Updates sounded fine.

But no one stayed with the result.

Work rarely fails from lack of effort.
It fails when ownership gets thin.

When ownership is spread thin, outcomes evaporate.

...quietly

Escalation isn’t a failure...silence is.
Most founders feel this weekly, even if they don’t say it out loud:

The project didn’t blow up.
It just arrived… weaker than promised.

Deadlines met.
Energy drained.
Outcome diluted.

That’s execution drag.
Not because people are lazy
but because escalation has been quietly punished.

•
Here’s the uncomfortable first principle:
In most SMEs, escalation is treated like incompetence.
So competent people delay it.

They wait.
They “try one more thing.”
They protect their image instead of the outcome.

And by the time you hear about it,
you’re not solving,  you’re rescuing.

•
Watch the pattern:
 • Leaders say “own it”
 • Teams hear “don’t bother me”
 • Risks go underground
 • Founders become the system again

That’s how capable teams still create key-person dependency.

Not because they can’t think
 but because the culture trained them when not to speak.

•
In healthy execution cultures, escalation isn’t political.
It’s professional.

Owners escalate early because they understand this:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.

•
When escalation is normalized:
 • Decisions surface sooner
 • Tradeoffs are explicit
 • Outcomes stabilize
 • Leaders stop being surprise absorbers

That’s when a founder earns quiet authority
 not by being needed everywhere,
 but by being trusted when it matters.

If escalation feels rare in your company, it’s worth asking why.

Most work doesn’t fail loudly.
It fades...when no one is really watching the whole thing.

- Everyone did their part.
- Meetings were held.
- Tasks were closed.

And somehow, the thing still didn’t land.

I’ve been on both sides of this.
Busy days. 
Clean to-do list.

That low-grade discomfort you can’t quite explain.

It usually comes from what happens between the tasks.
- the result
- the handoffs
- the risks
- the truth
- the escalation
- the tradeoffs

That’s the missing layer.

Strong teams don’t just assign work.
Someone quietly carries the outcome.

Not a hero.
Not a manager.

Just a human willing to stay with it longer than their job description.

Where have you seen this show up most clearly...and what changed once someone owned the outcome?

Image credit: Pejac on Pinterest

Why “ownership” is the most 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 move a smart employee can make.

I used to think ownership was a personality trait.
You either had it, or you didn’t.

That was incomplete thinking.

Here’s the first-principles truth most leaders miss:

People don’t avoid ownership because they don’t care.
They avoid it because ownership is socially dangerous.

Watch what actually happens inside growing companies.

Smart people learn early that:
- Taking charge can look like overstepping
- Solving the whole problem triggers territorial behavior
- Acting decisively without a title gets you labeled “difficult”

So they adapt.

They deliver tasks.
They wait for permission.
They optimize for safety, not outcomes.

And leadership calls it “lack of initiative.”

That’s not a motivation problem.
That’s a system problem.

Ownership doesn’t emerge when you demand it.
It emerges when the environment rewards it.

If you’re interested in building teams that think with you (not just for you)
follow along.

There’s a moment in every growing company that no one names...
Work is moving.

Deadlines are met.
Everyone looks… competent.

And yet
nothing feels lighter.

That’s not a lack of effort.
It’s a lack of friction removal.

Here’s the principle I learned too late:
- Tasks move work forward.
- Friction determines whether outcomes arrive.

Outcome owners don’t wait for clearer instructions or permission.

They scan for drag, and remove it before it becomes visible.

Most teams are trained to do the opposite.
- They’re rewarded for staying in lane.
- Avoiding mistakes.
- Not “overstepping.”

So friction builds quietly:
- unclear ownership,
- small misalignments,
- decisions deferred for later.

No one is wrong.
Everyone is reasonable.

And execution slows anyway.
That’s execution drag.

Where does friction quietly build on your team, and who owns removing it?

Image credit: Little minds journey on Pinterest

The real reason everything escalates to you
has nothing to do with competence.

It is a dangerous illusion to think this is a motivation problem.
It isn’t.

It’s an identity problem.

Most people are taught, implicitly:
 “My job is to complete what’s assigned.”

Outcome owners operate by a different rule:
 “My job is to make the result inevitable.”

That single rule changes behavior fast.

•
Here’s what it looks like in practice.

Task-doer:
 • Flags an issue
 • Waits for direction
 • Proceeds cautiously

Outcome owner's default wiring:
 • Sees the issue
 • Resolves it
 • Informs you after

Not reckless.
Responsible.

•

This is the part founders feel viscerally:

When no one removes friction without permission,
the leader becomes the default friction remover.

Every delay routes upward.
Every gray area lands on your plate.

You don’t lead the system.
You are the system.

•
The fix isn’t more oversight.
It’s ownership transfer.

Make friction removal explicit:
 • What friction are you expected to eliminate?
 • What decisions don’t require approval?
 • What outcome do you own end-to-end?

When even one or two people internalize this,
your workload drops (without another delegation meeting).

That’s when scale starts behaving.

•
Most leaders don’t need better teams.
They need one upgrade:

Turning capable task executors
 into people who remove friction before it reaches them.

That’s the difference between managing motion
 and leading outcomes.

•
If this named something you’ve felt but couldn’t articulate, repost it.
Someone on your team might finally understand what “ownership” actually means.
Follow Ibrahim Kaizen for first-principles leadership thinking
 designed to reduce friction

Image credit: Jacquard Albin

The most competent founders accidentally train their teams to fail.
Not loudly. Not intentionally. Almost invisibly.

Here’s the quiet irony:
The more competent the founder,
the more ownership the team withholds.

Not consciously...strategically.

Because when you’re the decision-maker of last resort,
 everyone learns the real rule:

“If it really matters, the founder will step in.”

So people hesitate.
Escalate late.
Optimize for safety instead of ownership.

And execution drag becomes cultural background noise.

•
The turning point isn’t more accountability meetings.
It’s an identity shift, for the leader first.

From:
 “I need to stay close so nothing breaks.”

To:
 “My job is to design leaders who can break things safely.”

Ownership doesn’t emerge when you demand it.
It emerges when the environment rewards it.

Clear authority.
Clean handoffs.
Real consequences, positive and negative.

That’s when people stop asking,
 “Is this allowed?”
 
and start asking,
 “Is this mine?”

•

If this hit a nerve, you’re not broken.
You’re early.

Most founders notice this right before burnout
 or right after a near-miss they had to personally save.

If you know an operator quietly carrying too much,
repost this for them.

They’ll recognize themselves faster than they’ll admit.

Image credit: George1200 on Pinterest

Most founders say they want “ownership.”
What they’re actually asking for is relief.

Not the spa-day kind.
The please stop dragging my nervous system through every decision kind.

Here’s the translation layer:
• “𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙛-𝙗𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠”
 = Think it through before it touches my desk.

• “𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙖𝙨𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚”
 = Make outcomes move without me applying social pressure.

• “𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙬𝙖𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙡 𝙁𝙧𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥”
 = Time isn’t the problem. Courage is.

• “𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠 𝙞𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮”
 = Don’t confuse activity with responsibility.

• “𝙎𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙮𝙤𝙪’𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙘𝙠𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨”
 = I hired adults. Show me judgment.

This isn’t about motivation.
It’s about where decisions actually get carried.

The unlock isn’t hiring superheroes.

It’s upgrading the inner operating system of one or two people already inside the business:

• From task-completers → outcome owners
• From escalation-first → judgment-first
• From “checking in” → carrying the weight

When that shift happens, something strange follows:
You work less, not because you disappeared,
but because the system stopped leaning on you.

That’s real leverage.
That’s power without overwork.

If any part of this felt uncomfortably familiar,
don’t introspect about it.

𝗠𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁.

Run a 60-minute team diagnostic to see:
 • where ownership collapses
 • what keeps execution stuck to you
 • what to change before growth makes it expensive

Clarity beats guesswork. Every time.
DM me “𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰.”


Image credit: sciutoabby on Pinterest

taplio

The Battle

Alberto Chierici

Ibrahim Kaizen

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreIbrahim Kaizen's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Alberto Chierici

Ibrahim Kaizen

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Ibrahim Kaizen's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreIbrahim Kaizen's LinkedIn Performance