Andrew Constable, MBA, LSSBB

Do you have a real strategy or just a plan that looks like one? 

Most organisations fail because their strategy isn’t clearly defined or it isn’t consistently executed.

Leaders tell me the same thing again and again:

“We are not confident our strategy is the right one and even when it is, it’s not being delivered. 

This dual challenge - strategy design and execution - is the core problem I help organisations with. 

𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐈 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡

CEOs, Chief Strategy Officers, transformation leaders, and senior teams who want to:

↳ Clarify strategic choices and sharpen where-to-play/how-to-win
↳ Align functions and break down siloed execution
↳ Turn Balanced Scorecards, KPIs, OKRs into performance drivers—not reporting tools
↳ Build a culture of discipline, focus, and accountability using EFQM
↳ Strengthen innovation and business model design
↳ Move from “strategic plans” to measurable, sustainable results

Whether working in Europe, North America, Asia, or the GCC, these challenges show up everywhere—and the costs are universal.

𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐩

I partner with leadership teams in:

1. Strategy Formulation
Clear choices, evidence-based design, and actionable strategic narratives using tools like Play-to-Win, Blue Ocean Strategy, and strategic foresight.

2. Strategy Execution Systems
Balanced Scorecards, OKRs, KPI and EFQM systems built to activate action—not bureaucracy.

3. Business Model Innovation
Helping organisations reimagine how they create, deliver, and capture value using Strategyzer, Lean Startup, and evidence-based innovation practices.

My approach blends practical execution expertise with the rigour of academic research and global experience.

𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐞

↳ Thinkers360 Top Voice 2023–2025 for strategy / innovation
↳ International experience with organisations including IBM, Roche, Symrise, NEC, and Informa
↳ Deep expertise across strategy formulation, execution, and business model innovation
↳ 2x Master's degrees, MBA & Master of Professional Practice  + DBA candidate researching the root causes of strategy–execution failure
↳ Certified in the world's leading strategy / Innovation frameworks

Credentials matter only because they help me solve the problem that matters most:

👉 Closing the gap between strategy design and strategy delivery.

When organisations fix that gap, they move faster, innovate smarter, and sustain higher performance.

If your strategy isn’t fully translating into results, let’s talk.

📩 andrew.constable@visualisesolutions.co.uk
🌐 www.visualisesolutions.co.uk

Principal Managing Partner

We are a consulting firm headquartered in the heart of Leicestershire, UK.

We help medium-sized businesses innovate and make measurable progress towards their business outcomes so their companies thrive.

Over the years, we’ve used proven and guaranteed Innovation and strategy execution processes to generate tangible business outcomes in 12 weeks ⏱️ for companies including Roche, IBM and many others.

Our services include

Innovation Programmes 🌟
Strategy Execution Programmes 🌟
OKR Programmes 🌟
Strategic Management 🌟

Working with a budget? Let’s talk.

Andrew Constable, MBA

Strategy fails long before execution.

It fails at posture.

Most organisations don’t have a strategy problem.
They have a strategic posture problem.

Here’s what that actually means:

☑ Strategic posture is your dominant orientation.
↳ Are you aggressive or defensive?
↳ Shaping markets or reacting to them?
↳ Optimising for efficiency or innovation?
↳ Protecting the core or exploring new growth?

It reflects:
↳ Risk appetite
↳ Growth ambition
↳ Competitive intent
↳ Innovation intensity
↳ Resource allocation bias

It’s the umbrella logic behind every " where to play " and " how to win " choice.

And most leaders never make it explicit.

The 4 classic postures (Miles & Snow model):

☑ Prospector
↳ Constant innovation
↳ First-mover behaviour
↳ High risk tolerance
↳ Heavy R&D investment

Example: Tesla in its early EV push.

☑ Defender
↳ Protects core markets
↳ Cost discipline
↳ Operational efficiency
↳ Limited innovation

Example: Ryanair.

☑ Analyzer
↳ Hybrid model
↳ Defends the core
↳ Selectively innovates
↳ Follows proven breakthroughs

Example: Apple.

☑ Reactor
↳ No consistent logic
↳ Strategy by pressure
↳ Internal misalignment

This isn’t a posture.
It’s a warning sign.

Now here’s where most companies get it wrong:

They confuse posture with strategy.

Strategic posture = broad stance.
Strategy = specific choices.

Posture shapes:
☑ Investment decisions
☑ KPI design
☑ Org structure
☑ Talent profile
☑ OKRs

If your KPIs reward Defender behaviour…
But leadership declares a Prospector ambition…

You don’t have a performance issue.

You have structural hypocrisy.

That’s how the strategy–execution gap widens.

Posture must be visible in:

☑ Capital allocation
☑ Leadership behaviour
☑ Performance systems
☑ Capability building

If it’s not embedded in systems,
it’s just rhetoric.

Another lens to think about posture:

☑ Offensive vs Defensive
☑ Growth vs Harvest
☑ Differentiation vs Cost Leadership
☑ Exploration vs Exploitation

At its core:

Strategic posture is your organisation’s attitude toward uncertainty and competition.

Make it explicit.
Align systems to it.
Or accept drift.

Strategy doesn’t fail in PowerPoint.
It fails in posture.

Ps. if you like content like this, please follow me.

Andrew Constable, MBA, Prof M

A CMO & CEO. Dedicated to driving growth and promoting innovative marketing for businesses with bold goals

With over 20 years of experience in digital marketing, I excel at crafting high-impact strategies that drive growth and success for well-known brands. My unique blend of technical expertise, extensive management experience, and real-world business acumen make me an invaluable asset to any project.

Having served as the CEO of Blue Thirst, I led my team to achieve prestigious industry certifications, and I've masterminded innovative marketing strategies for renowned brands.

🔸 Proven success in delivering multi-million-pound revenue streams
🔸 Extensive experience in managing and developing high-performing teams
🔸 Demonstrated ability to drive growth and innovation in various sectors

Martin McAndrew

Most ad accounts leak budget quietly.

When we review Google Ads or Meta accounts at Blue Thirst, the issue is rarely one obvious mistake. It is usually a collection of small inefficiencies.
Each one looks harmless on its own.

Campaign overlap.
Keywords competing in the same auctions.
Audiences fighting each other across campaigns.
None of these look dramatic inside the dashboard, but together they quietly drain budget every day.

Think of a pipe slowly leaking coins.
At first the drip feels insignificant.
But over time the bucket underneath fills with money that should never have left the system.

Better performance usually comes from fixing the structure before increasing the budget.

What is the most surprising inefficiency you have ever discovered in an ad account?

 #DigitalMarketing #B2B #saas #leadership #technology

Scaling spend is easy. Scaling profit is not.

A lot of paid media accounts can take more budget. That part is rarely the issue. The harder part is keeping efficiency, margin, and conversion rate stable while delivery expands.

This is where teams get caught out. Platform performance can still look acceptable while the economics underneath start weakening. CPCs rise a bit, conversion rate softens a bit, new customer quality drifts a bit, and suddenly the extra revenue is carrying less actual value. The account is bigger, but the business is not necessarily stronger. Scale without control usually shows up later in profit, not immediately in spend.

It is a bit like pushing a throttle lever forward while the profit gauge drops. Everything looks like it is accelerating. The system is doing exactly what you asked. It is just no longer moving in the direction that matters most.
The real job in growth is not increasing spend. It is knowing how far the account can go before margin starts to break, then building the structure to push that limit further.

How does your team decide whether growth is actually profitable growth?
#DigitalMarketing #B2B #saas #leadership #future

Most ecommerce companies think scaling paid media is about budget.

It isn’t.
It is about judgement.

Platforms have automated almost everything that used to be mechanical.
Bidding.
Placement selection.
Audience expansion.
Even parts of creative testing.

What is left is the part that is hardest to hire.

Strategy.

Knowing when to push spend and when to hold back.
Understanding margin pressure before it shows up in the dashboard.
Seeing signal changes before the platform reacts to them.

That level of thinking is rare.

The uncomfortable reality for many scaling ecommerce brands is this:

You are not competing for traffic.
You are competing for talent that knows what to do with it.

And the supply of genuinely strong paid media strategists is tiny.

Most teams are full of people who know how to operate platforms.

Very few know how to run growth.

The difference shows up when budgets increase.

Average operators scale spend.
Strong strategists scale profit.

That gap becomes painfully visible once you pass seven figures in revenue.

Which raises a harder leadership question.

If the talent pool is this small, the real advantage is not just hiring well.

It is building systems that allow the few great people you do find to make better decisions, faster.

Because the companies that win in the next phase of digital will not simply have larger marketing teams.

They will have better judgement per pound spent.

#digitalmarketing #marketing #ppc

Most ad accounts are built upside down.

When we review large Google Ads accounts, the same pattern appears again and again.
Campaigns, budgets and automation are running at full speed, but the underlying measurement structure is weak.

The order is wrong.

Strong accounts are built from the ground up.
Conversion tracking, event quality, and signal integrity come first. Only then should campaign structure and bidding strategies be layered on top.

When that foundation is missing, optimisation becomes guesswork.
The platform still spends money. It just learns from bad signals.

It is similar to constructing a house by starting with the roof.
Everything above looks impressive for a while, but the structure underneath cannot support it.

In paid media, the foundation is always data.

Before increasing budgets, it is worth asking one simple question.

Is this account built on solid ground?

How often do you see this when reviewing ad accounts?

#DigitalMarketing #GoogleAds #B2B #SaaS #Technology

AI did not kill creativity. It made differentiation harder.


When anyone can produce content quickly, the real strategy is standing out, not just scaling up. If your brand looks like everyone else, you're invisible. The future of creativity is not just what you make—it's how you differentiate when the tools are shared.

#CreativityStrategy #AIInMarketing #Differentiation #BrandPositioning #ContentStrategy

Most ad accounts scale spend like an open pipe.
Very few install the valve.

Google Ads and Meta Ads are designed to increase flow.

When the system finds conversions, it pushes harder.
More auctions.
More impressions.
More spend.

Left unchecked, the pipe simply opens wider.

Revenue increases.
Budgets expand.
ROAS often looks stable on the surface.

But the system cannot see the economics behind the sale.

A high margin order and a low margin order look identical to the algorithm if the signal is just revenue.

So the platforms keep doing exactly what they are built to do.

Increase the flow.

Over time the mix shifts.

Lower margin products receive more exposure.
Discount driven conversions dominate the signal.
Customer acquisition becomes progressively more expensive to sustain.

Nothing is technically broken.

The system is simply optimising the objective it was given.

This is why profitable scale requires a valve.

Margin guardrails that sit upstream of bidding decisions.

Profit weighted conversion values.
Feed exclusions when contribution margin collapses.
Value based bidding aligned to product economics.

Because the platforms optimise extremely well.

The real question is whether we are controlling the flow.

#GoogleAds #MetaAds #PerformanceMarketing #EcommerceGrowth #DigitalStrategy

More data does not mean better measurement.

As automation expands across marketing platforms, something subtle starts to happen.

Signal quality declines.

More events are captured.
More dashboards are created.
More numbers move across the screen.

But the underlying signal becomes diluted.

When everything is measured, nothing is clearly understood.

Automation systems depend on clean signals.
They learn from patterns.
If the data is noisy, the decisions become noisy too.

This is the constraint most teams miss.

The future problem in marketing is not access to data.
It is the ability to protect signal quality.

Fewer events.
Stronger definitions.
Cleaner inputs.

Precision will outperform volume.

Because when the signal is clear, the system can actually learn.

#DigitalMarketing #Measurement #MarketingData #GrowthStrategy #MarketingOperations

Privacy used to be treated as a legal checkbox.

Something handled after the marketing systems were already running.

That approach is starting to break.

Regulators are increasing enforcement around how customer data is collected, stored, and used. At the same time platforms are reducing the amount of third-party data available to advertisers.

The result is a quiet shift in advantage.

Companies with strong first-party data systems can still move quickly. Their signals are clearer, their measurement is stronger, and their decisions are grounded in data they actually control.

Companies that relied on borrowed data are starting to feel friction. Attribution becomes weaker. Targeting becomes less reliable. Optimisation slows down.

Privacy enforcement is not just a compliance pressure.

It is becoming a competitive filter.

Clean consent structures.
Well managed customer data.
Clear governance over how information flows through the organisation.

These things used to be considered operational overhead.

Now they determine who gets access to the signals that drive modern marketing performance.

Privacy used to be compliance.

Now it’s access.

#DigitalMarketing #DataStrategy #Privacy #FirstPartyData #MarketingStrategy

Google is dimming the search lights.

For years search marketers relied on query visibility to understand intent and control waste. That view is becoming weaker as more of the search process moves behind the platform wall.

The issue is not that automation is bad. The issue is that judgement depends on signal. When less search data is visible it becomes harder to see where intent is shifting, where inefficiencies sit, and where budget quietly leaks.
It is similar to landing aircraft as the runway lights slowly fade. Planes still land and the system still appears to function.

But every decision becomes slightly harder and the margin for error becomes smaller.

The practical response is building stronger first party data and tighter decision systems so less depends on what the platform decides to show.
How are teams adapting as search visibility keeps shrinking?

#DigitalMarketing #B2B #saas #leadership #future

More campaigns does not mean more growth.

A lot of marketing teams feel productive because the machine is always running. More campaigns. More creative. More tests. More reporting. More platform activity.

But activity is not the same as progress. In a lot of accounts, extra campaigns create overlap, duplicate learning, split budgets, and make decision-making slower rather than sharper. The team feels busy, but the commercial outcome barely moves. That usually points to a strategy problem, not a workload problem.

It is a bit like watching a room full of gears spinning at full speed while the progress meter stays at zero. Everything looks impressive. Everything sounds active. But the system is not actually taking you anywhere.
The real question is not how much your team is doing. It is whether the work is compounding into better results.

How often do marketing teams mistake movement for momentum?

#DigitalMarketing #B2B #leadership #saas #future

taplio

The Battle

Andrew Constable, MBA

Martin McAndrew

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreAndrew Constable, MBA's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMartin McAndrew's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Andrew Constable, MBA

Martin McAndrew

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Andrew Constable, MBA's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMartin McAndrew's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreAndrew Constable, MBA's LinkedIn Performance