Armand Ruiz

Director Data Science & AI Elite

VP of Product - AI Platform @IBM

As the Director of AI Engineering at IBM, I lead the watsonx team, a global group of over 1,000 AI Engineers who work on cutting-edge Generative AI solutions for various industries. With more than 12 years of experience in AI, I have a passion for democratizing practical AI skills and empowering professionals to leverage AI to transform their business.

Previously, I managed IBM's Data Science and AI Elite, delivering complex AI implementations for hundreds of clients. 

I also led the product management of IBM Watson Studio and Watson Machine Learning, an AI platform used by hundreds of customers and SaaS apps powered by AI. I hold a Master of Science in Telecommunications from Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya and speak three languages: Spanish, Catalan, French, and English.

Connect with me!

✉️ JOIN MY NEWSLETTER: Every Saturday morning, you'll get 1 actionable tip to launch and grow your AI strategies in business in less than 4 minutes. → GO HERE: https://www.nocode.ai/

📧 Email: armand@nocode.ai
X: @armand_ruiz


"It is kind of fun to do the impossible"
All opinions are my own and don't represent my employer.

Director watsonx team - Client Engineering

I am building the world's largest team of 𝐀𝐈 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐬 by

- Recruiting hundreds of new engineers around the globe
- Reskilling our existing talent
- Offering them top-quality training in new-generation AI

Responsible for Pre-Sales Generative AI Pilots with the new IBM watsonx.ai Platform.

I’ve been practically living in Claude Code lately. If you build with AI daily, you know that your orchestration workflow is just as important as the model itself.

Recently, Boris Cherny (the creator of Claude Code at Anthropic) shared the internal best practices and workflows his team actually uses on a daily basis. 

Someone brilliantly distilled those threads into a structured CLAUDE.md file that you can drop straight into the root of any project.

It essentially acts as a system prompt that turns Claude into a much more autonomous, rigorous engineering partner.

Here is what the file enforces:
1/ Workflow Orchestration: Mandates a "Plan Node Default" for any task over 3 steps and uses subagents liberally to keep the main context window clean.

2/ The Self-Improvement Loop: This is the real magic. After ANY correction, it updates a tasks/lessons.md file. You are building a compounding system where the mistake rate drops over time because it actively learns from your feedback.

3/ Verification Before Done: It cannot mark a task complete without proving it works (diffing behavior, running tests, checking logs). "Would a staff engineer approve this?"

4/ Autonomous Bug Fixing: Zero hand-holding. You point it at failing CI tests or error logs, and it goes to work without requiring constant context switching from you.

5/ Strict Task Management: Forces a "Plan First" approach written to a todo.md with checkable items before implementation even starts.

It forces the AI to prioritize simplicity, find root causes instead of temporary fixes, and minimize the blast radius of its changes.

If you are spending hours a day in the terminal with AI, setting up a strong .md instruction file like this will save you a massive amount of time and frustration.

It takes time and effort to set this up. If you do, you are ahead of everyone else.

If your employer isn’t providing unlimited Claude Code + secured MCPs to connect your enterprise repos, email, work-chat, meeting AI transcripts, calendar, and docs... they are likely moving at legacy speed. 

Without that context and tool access, you’re stuck in a cycle of manual copy-pasting and reinventing the wheel while the rest of the market moves in parallel workflows.

My advice? Don’t wait for the corporate roadmap to catch up. If you aren't getting these tools at work, force yourself to learn these agentic workflows on the side. 

When companies move this slowly, they eventually run into trouble and you don't want to find yourself at a disadvantage in today's market because your professional environment kept you in the past.

Stay curious and keep your skills ahead of your company's tech stack.

Everyone's talking about which LLM is best for agents. But after reading Lance Martin's deep dive into Manus's architecture, I'm convinced the real differentiator isn't the model. It's the context engineering around it.

The problem: A typical Manus task makes ~50 tool calls. Without careful management, results pile up in the context window and the LLM gets dumber the longer it runs. 

Anthropic calls it "attention budget depletion." 

Chroma calls it "context rot."

Manus solves this with three strategies:
𝟏. 𝐑𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞: Older tool results get compacted to file path references. When that's not enough, the full trajectory gets summarized via structured schema.

𝟐. 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝: Fewer than 20 atomic tools bound to the LLM. Everything else runs in a sandbox via bash. The model stays lean.

𝟑. 𝐈𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞: Sub-agents exist to give each task a clean context window, not to mimic human roles. No context bleed.

On top of that, Manus doesn't commit to one model. It routes tasks; Claude for code, Gemini for multimodal, OpenAI for math. 

Model-agnostic by design.

The takeaway: Manus has been refactored 5 times since launch. If a stronger model doesn't improve your agent, your engineering is the bottleneck.

Stop obsessing over which model to pick. Start obsessing over the implementation around it.

Full article: https://lnkd.in/gaY3rAV5

Prediction: Token budgets will soon surpass human salaries.

We are entering an era where the cost of compute for reasoning is becoming a primary line item, and the numbers are scaling fast.

I am already seeing developers consuming $100k+ a week in tokens.

It sounds astronomical, but when you look at the output, the ROI is there. They aren't just running a single chat thread; they are spinning up massive parallel processes. Swarms of agents coding, debugging, testing, and architecting simultaneously. The velocity is incredible.

But at that scale, cloud inference costs become the bottleneck.

The big unlock? Local Compute.

Putting a Mac Mini (or equivalent high-performance local hardware) on every developer's desk to run local models is the inevitable next step. We need to move the heavy lifting to the edge to make this sustainable. 

Invest $10,000 on a local computer and you have unlimited AI.

This creates a massive new need for the Enterprise: Fleet Management for Models.

Just as we manage laptops with MDM, companies will need a way to manage these distributed AI systems; securely pushing the latest Open Source models to local machines, updating weights, and orchestrating the workflow between local "thinking" and cloud "verification."

The future is hybrid, and the infrastructure to support it is being built right now.

I’m building my Personal OS to automate my mental overhead. For now, it’s simple, but the potential is already showing. I’ve moved away from "checking notifications" to a Pulse-based system.

How it works: 
1️⃣ Orchestration: Claude.md acts as the central hub, invoked by a launchd scheduler. 
2️⃣ Sequential Logic: Every "Pulse" (Morning/Midday/EOD) triggers a sequence of my agents: Scout → Horizon → Focus. 
3️⃣ Multi-Channel Delivery: I get a unified briefing via macOS notifications, an HTML digest, and my terminal.

The Agent Roster:
- Scout (/scout): Google Chat & Email monitor. It knows my VIP list and drafts replies before I even see the message. If something is important it will notify me, and even give me a call.
- Horizon (/horizon): The calendar expert. No more walking into meetings cold.
- Focus (/focus): The filter. It turns the noise into a top actionable list.

I feel spend less time "managing" my day and more time executing it. 

I also turn all the context for the day ahead into a fun podcast, and that gets me ready for the day and fully prepared.

I've been using computers in a completely different way lately. No much clicking. No browsing through tabs. No filling out forms. I describe what I want done, and agents go do it.

Many are still building software for humans. Replicating existing apps with AI. 

But that's not where this is going. The moment I stopped thinking of myself as a "user" and started thinking of myself as an orchestrator, everything changed. I set goals. I define constraints. I verify outcomes. That's it. The entire middle — the actual work — I don't touch it anymore.

And now I can't unsee it: most software we're building today is already obsolete. It's designed for humans to operate. But humans aren't going to be the operators anymore.

The new generation of software won't have dashboards. It won't have onboarding flows. It'll have APIs, state machines, and feedback loops built for AI agents, not for people.

The real question isn't "how do we develop this product/feature for humans using AI?" --> It's "if no human ever had to touch this, what would we build from scratch?"

if you are in a leadership position, you are punishing your team by keeping them busy.

If your team is too busy doing their "normal jobs" to spend hours a week experimenting with AI, you are failing them.

You are setting them up to be replaced by people who have the time to learn.

They will get disrupted, either by another department within the company or by a competitor, not because of AI, but because of your lack of urgency and understanding of the current landscape.

You have to give people the time, because integrating AI into daily workflows isn't something that happens overnight.

You have to actively remove work from their plates so they can learn the new way to work.

Because we are now all beginners again.

If you don't give them the time, they will never learn it, and your company will suffer a slow, painful decline into inefficiency.

No matter how big you are.

you need to clear your calendar and invest in AI implementation for your own productivity asap

The hardest part isn't the technology. It's making the time to actually sit down and try it.

Block 2 hours a day. Thank me later

Parallelism is the biggest unlock in AI. The real shift isn't speed; it's concurrency.

 I can now run 10 "hard things" simultaneously while I'm in meetings.

My workflow has flipped:
- Old way: Block time to do the work. Maybe use AI to do it faster.
- New way: Block time to review the results and give more context knowledge to the AIs.

We are moving from being "doers" to orchestrators. Your output is no longer limited by your hours, but by the number of parallel streams you can manage.

I get 100s of emails and chats daily. The only way to manage it is to stop everything, dive in, and manually filter the signal from the noise. It's inefficient and a total focus-killer.

So i built Mark, my Communications AI Agent. Its job is simple:
1/ Monitor Everything: It watches all my inboxes and chats 24/7.
2/ Surface What Matters: It identifies critical messages and ignores the rest.
3/ Notify Intelligently: I get a clean Terminal and Desktop notification with a summary file. No more context switching.

But that's just the start. The real magic is next → I'm connecting Mark to a shared knowledge base of all my documents, past conversations, and daily meeting notes.

Soon, it won't just notify me. It will draft context-aware replies for almost everything.

That's my way to solve this. I'm curious...have you developed something similar?

I moved from the EU to the US more than 10 years ago, and while I miss many things about Europe, I have to agree with the man of the hour 🦄 Peter Steinberger : the US is an incredible place for builders right now. 

There's an undeniable energy and enthusiasm here that's hard to find elsewhere. 

It feels like a special time to be building here.

Manus just shared why most people are still stuck in the "chat" era: the real value has shifted from conversational bots to custom superagents.

Chatbots answer questions; superagents execute workflows. 

But they aren't magic, you need to understand the underlying mechanics and put in the time to customize them for your specific needs. If you treat them like a standard search bar, you’re leaving 90% of the value on the table.

Here is how to actually get them to work for you:
1/ Move from Prompting to Engineering: Stop asking "Can you do X?" and start defining the architecture of the task.

2/ Invest in the Setup: Spend the time upfront to define personas, data sources, and specific tool-use constraints. The more "narrow" the agent's focus, the higher the quality.

3/ Iterative Refinement: A superagent is never "done." You have to monitor the execution and tune the instructions based on real-world failures.

Swipe through for the tips that actually matter for high-stakes execution.

Manus Intro

What’s the point of buying software when you can just create it on the fly?

It might take our generation a minute to adapt, but the next generation is growing up expecting to build exactly what they need. For them, the only thing that matters is the infrastructure to power it.

I’ve been building non-stop lately. I’ve never felt this empowered in my career. I can literally turn my ideas into reality in a matter of hours.

yesterday at the gym I heard someone pitching their new AI tool that helps you “do more, faster.” i feel like doing less and slower. am i the only one?

ok, so you moved from a chatbot to an AI agent. and you think you are ahead already.

but if you are still the one triggering all the actions...

if the agent isn't working autonomously for you all day long...

and if you don't have 10 of them running in parallel...

you are nowhere close to calling yourself AI-native. 

i recommend you spend the weekend learning. this is a good place to start: https://lnkd.in/eW4Sam_6

Every PM should understand evals. Not "be an expert." Not "build the eval framework yourself." Just understand them.

Here's why.

A/B testing changed product management forever. Before it, PMs guessed. After it, they measured. Evals are doing the same thing for AI products and systems but most PMs have heard the word but they don't know what they're talking about. 

An eval is how you answer one simple question: "Is my AI actually good?"

Not vibes. Not "it seems better." Not "the demo looked great." Actual, measurable, repeatable quality assessment.

Here's what you should tell tell your product leads:

1. Start with a golden set: a curated dataset where you know the right answers. This becomes your source of truth.

2. Define your graders: what does "good" look like? Accuracy? Tone? Factual correctness? Be specific.

3. Run your model against the golden set and score it. That's your baseline.

4. Every time you change something - new prompt, new model, new data — run evals again. Did it get better or worse?

5. Automate this. The speed of your eval loop determines how fast your AI improves.

That's it. That's the core.

The teams that ship reliable AI products aren't the ones with the best models. They're the ones with the best evals practice.

If you're a PM working on anything AI-related and you can't answer "how do we know it's good?"... start there.

Evals are the new A/B testing. And just like A/B testing, the PMs who get it early will have a massive advantage.

Manus Agents just launched on Telegram and it changes how you interact with AI agents entirely. I've been using this all weekend non-stop.

This isn't a chatbot bolted onto a messaging app. It's the full Manus — reasoning, multi-step task execution, tool use — running inside a conversation you already have open.

Here's what makes it different:
1/ Zero setup friction. Scan a QR code. You're connected in under a minute. No API tokens. No config files. No terminal.

2/ Full task execution from chat. Research, data processing, structured reports, PDFs — initiated and delivered without ever leaving the conversation.

3/ Multimodal by default. Send a voice message, a photo, a document. The agent transcribes, interprets, and acts. No manual file handling.

4/ It remembers how you work. Set your communication style — concise, structured, conversational — and it adapts across every interaction.

5/ You pick the model. Manus 1.6 Max for deep reasoning and creative work. Manus 1.6 Lite for fast, everyday tasks. Both go end-to-end.

But here's what got my attention even more — the cofounder just shared what's coming next:

1/ Create your own specialized agents and plug them into any group chat.

2/ WhatsApp, LINE, Slack, Discord support landing soon.

3/ Native Windows and Mac apps that let Manus operate your computer — like Browser Operator, but way more powerful.

And a lot more already in the shipping pipeline. Big updates dropping over the next 30 days.

Your AI agent shouldn't live behind a login screen on a separate platform. It should be wherever you already are — one message away, ready the moment you need it.

Learn more here: https://lnkd.in/gSuAx5UX

trust your AI overlord and... just hit accept 🤣

Recently, I stumbled across a YouTube video that completely stopped me in my tracks.

An urban explorer infiltrates the abandoned IBM center on the Côte d'Azur in La Gaude in South of France. Hearing the narrator describe it as a "vestige of Silicon Valley" and seeing that massive concrete colossus sitting empty in the middle of the forest is absolutely heartbreaking 💔 

For me, that place wasn't just a building. It was pure magic. It was where my professional life truly began and where my life completely transformed.

Early in my career, I had the chance to visit this unbelievable, high-energy campus while I was interning for IBM in Belgium. I knew immediately I belonged there, and I did absolutely everything in my power to get hired and eventually, I earned my spot.

When I look at the footage of those abandoned offices and empty reception halls, I don't see decay. I see endless, vibrant memories:

- Going from a nervous intern to earning my first full-time role.
- Working late into the night and battling those early-career nerves before major presentations.
- Learning a completely new language (French!).
- The incredible lunches, coffee breaks and walks around the campus with colleagues who became amazing, lifelong friends.
- Spending hours on the campus soccer & tennis courts, both competing in tournaments and playing with colleagues. I also learned to play la pétanque!
- And most importantly, it’s where I met my incredible wife.

That campus was the launchpad that gave me the opportunity to eventually relocate to the US. 

Looking back, I can draw a direct line from walking through those doors in France to my time as VP of AI Platform at IBM, and to do now the most exciting work in my career in Silicon Valley.

The doors might be closed, but the energy of what we experienced there is still very much alive. 

I will forever be grateful for that chapter, those people, and those memories.

Link to the video: https://lnkd.in/gA-Wja2s

Open video: INFILTRATION d’IBM, le plus gros site abandonné de la Côte D’Azur mais aussi le plus Surveillé !!!  on youtu.be

INFILTRATION d’IBM, le plus gros site abandonné de la Côte D’Azur mais aussi le plus Surveillé !!! 

I thought I was a heavy AI user. Then my usage 3x'd in the last 30 days. The pace of change is accelerating and what was cutting-edge a month ago is now the baseline. The new default is managing AI agents, not just using them.

This chart below is my AI usage (tokens)

Jeremy Prasetyo

World Champion turned Cyberpreneur | Building an AI SaaS company to $1M ARR and sharing my insights along the way | Co-Founder & CEO, TRUSTBYTES

While everyone's talking about AI, the Agentic Web and Web3,
few understand how to turn them into competitive advantage, 
even fewer into institutional advantage.
That's where I come in.

I'm a former World Champion turned Tech Founder and Emerging Technology Strategist who decodes tomorrow's tech for today's leaders. 
Through my unique ability to break down complex technologies into actionable strategies, I help organizations transform uncertainty into opportunity.

As CEO of TRUSTBYTES and an internationally recognized keynote speaker, I bridge the gap between cutting-edge innovation and real-world implementation. 

My expertise spans:

→ Emerging Tech Translation
- Transforming AI and blockchain complexities into clear strategic advantages
- Converting technological uncertainty into market-leading opportunities
- Building innovation flywheels that compound over time

→ Leadership Acceleration
- Mentoring the next generation of tech-savvy leaders
- Guiding institutional transformation with practical frameworks
- Creating bridges between legacy systems and emerging technologies

→ Strategic Innovation
- Designing AI-driven business flywheels that scale
- Developing institutional-grade technology strategies
- Engineering frameworks for sustainable growth

Through high-impact keynotes, executive mentorship, and hands-on leadership, I empower decision-makers to turn technological complexity into market dominance. 

My approach merges deep technical insight with battle-tested business acumen, helping organizations thrive in rapid change.

Tech moves fast.
Markets move faster.
But institutional transformation?
That's where most leaders get stuck.
I'm here to change the game.

Follow me for actionable insights on emerging tech, leadership, and exponential growth. 

Let's build tomorrow's advantages today.

CEO & Co-Founder

FIGHTING CYBERCRIME LIKE IT'S 2030
Find more bugs in less time while saving up to 80% of cybersecurity resources.

HOW IT WORKS
TRUSTBYTES secures exponential technologies like Web 3.0, AI or Quantum TECH with its advanced AI that delivers unparalleled accuracy. By deploying self-learning AI agent swarms that adapt to evolving threats we protect systems with superior vulnerability detection and mitigation.

THE PROBLEM
$8 Trillion in Damages
Cybercrime Damages did cost the world $8 trillion USD in 2023.
Until now, global cybercrime costs grew by 15 percent each year.
But this number will grow exponentially, as hackers start using AI or even Quantum TECH.

Threat to Humanity
Warren Buffett calls cybercrime the biggest problem facing humanity - a threat exceeding nuclear weapons.
The answer lies in fighting fire with fire through AI counterforce.
TRUSTBYTES is that enabler for CISOs - an advanced AI system augmenting human experts to proactively remediate cyber threats before damage occurs.

OUR SOLUTION - SECURING EXPONENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES

➝ Web 3.0 - Smart Contract Auditing Suite

➝ Securing AI Systems

➝ Securing the Quantum TECH era


For more details visit: trustbytes.io

The advice that changed everything for Matthew McConaughey 
⤵

Most people don’t need permission to chase their dream.
They need someone to look them in the eye and say:
"If you're gonna do it - do it right. No excuses."

That's exactly what Matthew McConaughey got.

One sentence from his father became the launchpad for everything:
"Don't half-ass your dream."

It wasn’t comfort.
It wasn’t praise.
It was the wake-up call we all need.

Let’s break it down:

1/
 ➠ Permission vs. expectation

 ➝ We're raised to seek approval
 ➝ And to follow safe, respectable paths
 ➝ But "safe" often leads to silent resentment

↳ So stop playing by rules that were never yours


2/
 ➠ McConaughey's moment

 ➝ He was set for law school
 ➝ But wanted to chase film instead
 ➝ He feared disappointment

↳ What he got was belief - because he owned the choice


3/
 ➠ What his dad really said

 ➝ "Don't half-ass it" meant: go all in
 ➝ It wasn’t coddling - it was a challenge
 ➝ If you choose it, then back it with force

↳ Commitment is the cost of clarity


4/
 ➠ What that means for you

 ➝ Dreams aren't hobbies
 ➝ They're responsibilities
 ➝ And they demand effort

↳ Half-hearted effort kills more dreams than failure ever will


5/
 ➠ Why it still matters

 ➝ Owning your path inspires others
 ➝ Taking action changes identity
 ➝ Regret haunts the untried

↳ One act of courage often unlocks another


Most people wait for belief.
For an external validation.
For someone's permission.
But belief is earned by doing - not by waiting.


▶ What if "support" looked more like challenge?
▶ Who's waiting for you to act so they can believe?
▶ When was the last time you didn’t half-ass something?


//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: Matthew McConaughey, “Greenlights”

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

//

World Champion turned Entrepreneur | Follow me for emerging tech, leadership and growth topics | Co-Founder & CEO, TRUSTBYTES (Techstars ’25)

"This is the moment that decides everything"
- Patrick Bet-David
⤵

Before the strategy.
Before the money.
Before anyone knows your name.

There’s a quiet test almost nobody talks about.

And it shows up when you’re completely alone.


1/
➠ The seat no one warns you about

➝ No audience
↳ No backup

This doesn’t happen on stage.
It happens in a car, late at night, staring forward, talking to yourself.
No motivation left. No applause coming.

And this is where it starts getting real.


Now here’s the shift most people don’t expect.


2/
➠ Why you suddenly can’t call anyone

➝ They believed you
↳ You sold the dream

You told your partner you had a plan.
You told your friends you were building something big.
You told your parents you were choosing a harder road.

Calling now feels like admitting doubt.
So you sit with it instead.


And that silence?
It starts asking questions.


3/
➠ The negotiation phase

➝ Is this worth it
↳ Why am I doing this

This is where logic creeps in.
Money feels overrated.
Legacy feels unnecessary.
Comfort starts sounding responsible.

Not quitting yet.
Just… reconsidering.


And this is where most people slip.


4/
➠ How people quietly lose

➝ Logic wins
↳ Dreams retreat

Logic says get a job.
Logic says choose peace.
Logic says this pain isn’t necessary.

Everyone around you will agree.
They’ll even say you made the right call.
But there’s one problem.


Which leads to the final turn.


5/
➠ The only voice that matters
➝ Yours
↳ Alone

No mentor here.
No spouse.
No friends.

Just you deciding who you are when no one is watching.

That’s the moment Patrick Bet-David is talking about.

▶ what do you say in silence
▶ who do you listen to
▶ do you stay


//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: Patrick Bet-David

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

//

China isn’t replacing classrooms with AI.
They’re testing what happens when humans become data.
⤵

That distinction matters.

This is not about futuristic furniture.
Not about tablets built into desks.

It’s about what changes when learning is continuously measured.
And when behavior becomes a metric.


1/

➠ this is still an experiment
not nationwide
not universal
not evenly distributed
Only selected schools.
Mostly well funded regions.
Mostly pilot programs.

That’s how big shifts always start.
Quietly.
Before they scale.


2/
➠ what is actually being measured
interaction
posture
attention
response speed

Screens replace paper.
Sensors track behavior.
Dashboards summarize students.

Teaching becomes visible.
Students become readable.

Learning turns into signals.


3/
➠ why institutions want this
faster feedback
automated grading
performance clarity

Teachers save time.
Administrators gain insight.
Systems gain control.

Personalization sounds humane.
Optimization sounds efficient.

Both depend on defining ideal behavior.


4/
➠ where the tension lives
constant observation
psychological pressure
unequal access

Attention becomes a score.
Emotion becomes data.
Silence becomes compliance.

Urban schools accelerate.
Rural schools lag.

The gap widens quietly.


This is not about screens.
It’s about incentives.

What behavior gets rewarded.
What behavior gets flagged.
What behavior gets trained out.


Uncomfortable questions worth sitting with

▶ who defines attention
▶ who owns the data
▶ who audits the system
▶ who protects the child


//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: Video via Alvin Foo

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

//

Grammy winner. The next Super Bowl headliner.
They call him an overnight success…
But that’s what they don’t see: ⤵

The spotlight makes it look sudden.
The trophies make it look easy.
But the truth lives in the years before anyone cared.

Nobody “comes out of nowhere.”
They come out of now here,
doing boring work, daily,
long before it pays:

1/
➠ Before the world noticed

Before the Grammys.
Before the halftime stage.

There were grocery shifts in Puerto Rico.
Long hours. Low pay. No audience.

And when the shift ended, the real work started.


2/
➠ What happened after work
This is where most stories skip ahead
.
He went home and created anyway.
Recorded. Uploaded. Repeated.

No label.
No co-signs.
No guarantees.

Just consistency when nothing was happening yet.


3/
➠ Where most people quit

Here’s the uncomfortable part.

The songs with 200 plays.
The silence after posting.
The feeling that effort isn’t being rewarded.

This is where people stop.
Not because they lack talent —
But because patience runs out.


4/
➠ Why it finally worked

Momentum didn’t appear randomly.
It was earned quietly.

One song spread.
Then another.

Not because he was new.
Because he was ready when attention arrived.


5/
➠ Why this matters to you

You might be in the invisible phase right now.

No applause.
No validation.
No proof it will work.

That doesn’t mean you’re behind.
It means you’re building the foundation most people never finish.

▶ What is most inspiring to you about his story?


//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: https://lnkd.in/dJYXB6E6

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

World Champion turned Entrepreneur | Follow me for emerging tech, leadership and growth topics | Co-Founder & CEO, TRUSTBYTES (Techstars '25)

There has never been a better time in history to start…
…here’s why:
⤵

The ground is shaking. That’s your signal.

When everything feels unstable, most people freeze.

Founders shouldn’t.

Volatility is not a warning sign.
It’s a starting gun.

And right now, the clock speed of entire industries is accelerating.


1/
➠ The clock just changed

➝ AI is compressing industry timelines
↳ Code is being commoditized
↳ Workflows are being rebuilt
↳ Old playbooks are breaking

This is not a feature update.

It is a pace reset.

When the speed of progress increases, anything built for the old tempo becomes friction. And friction kills incumbents.


2/
➠ Speed beats size

➝ Big companies have scale and capital
↳ But they iterate slowly
↳ Layers slow decisions
↳ Legacy resists change

When experimentation becomes cheap, scale stops being the ultimate advantage.

If code is generated on demand…
If products can be rebuilt overnight…
If testing costs close to zero…

Then iteration becomes leverage.

Startups win because they:

➝ Move quickly
↳ Test constantly
↳ Pivot fast
↳ Ship daily

In a fast clock cycle, speed compounds.


3/
➠ The shake-up is the setup

➝ Markets feel unstable
↳ Business models feel exposed
↳ Assumptions feel fragile
↳ Certainty feels gone

Good.

Everyone is facing the same disruption.

But not everyone will respond with urgency.

When the clock cycle shifts this dramatically, startups almost always win.

Not because they are smarter.

Because they are faster.

And we have never seen the ground shake like this before.

So the better question is not,
“What happens to my industry?”

It is,
“How fast can I rebuild within it?”

▶ What if instability is the advantage?
▶ What if scale is slowing you down?
▶ What if caution is the real risk?
▶ What if this is your window?


//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: Sam Altman via @‌multiprenur

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

//

A new Silicon Valley startup just crossed $10B.
Its product? Your profession.
⤵
 
Knowledge used to be power.

Now it’s data.

Training material.

Expertise turned algorithms.
 
And your Stanford PhD?
Training the system that replaces themselves:


1/
➠ AI Progress Is Human-Led

➝ Experts identify model mistakes
↳ They measure them precisely
↳ They create scoring rubrics
↳ They reinforce better outputs

AI doesn’t improve by magic.

It improves because professionals teach it how.

And that raises the obvious question.


2/
➠ Are They Training Their Replacements?

➝ Yes
↳ In structured workflows
↳ At scale
↳ For speed

Entire professions are being distilled into repeatable logic.
But here’s the nuance.


3/
➠ What Actually Gets Replaced

➝ Pattern-based decisions
↳ Documentation
↳ Analysis
↳ Predictable judgment

What remains is harder to codify.


4/
➠ What Stays Human

➝ Context
↳ Ethics
↳ Empathy
↳ Accountability

The question is not whether AI will replace knowledge workers

The question is
▶ which parts of your expertise are defensible?
▶ Are you building skills that scale with AI?
▶ Or tasks that get absorbed by it?

 
//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: https://lnkd.in/dsetVE5e

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

How Valentine’s Day Became a 27 Billion Dollar Machine:
⤵

Most think it is about love

It is about systems

A fixed date
A rewritten narrative
Scaled production
Engineered expectation
Algorithmic amplification


1/
➠ From martyr to marketing moment

➝ A third century execution fixed February 14 in the calendar
↳ Repetition made it permanent

➝ Mid February rituals already normalized pairing
↳ Symbolism accelerated adoption

➝ Medieval poets reframed the date as romance
↳ Story changed behavior

Calendar created attention

Culture reassigned meaning


2/
➠ Printing made emotion scalable

➝ Rising literacy normalized written affection
↳ Emotion moved through paper

➝ Industrial printing reduced cost and increased reach
↳ Romance became repeatable

➝ Ornate cards turned feelings into products
↳ Inventory replaced intimacy

Standardization creates category

Category creates market


3/
➠ Corporations engineered expectation

➝ Heart shaped chocolate linked product with romance
↳ Packaging signaled love

➝ National card distribution normalized participation
↳ Not giving stood out

➝ Diamonds equaled permanence
↳ Price became proof

Demand was shaped

Obligation outperformed spontaneity


4/
➠ Media amplified pressure

➝ Income growth expanded spending power
↳ More joined

➝ Television broadcast idealized romance
↳ Comparison intensified

➝ Hollywood globalized expectations
↳ Pressure scaled

Private ritual became public signal


5/
➠ Algorithms optimized monetization

➝ Prix fixe menus increased margins
↳ Scarcity sold

➝ Bundled experiences raised spending
↳ Upselling normalized

➝ Social media amplified visibility
↳ Silence implied neglect

➝ One click purchasing removed friction
↳ Data timed emotion

Trigger

Campaign

Purchase

Signal


6/
➠ Why 27 billion is predictable

➝ Broad participation multiplies volume
↳ Spending compounds

➝ Stacked categories inflate totals
↳ Averages rise

➝ Luxury anchors raise baseline
↳ Expectations escalate

➝ Skipping feels risky
↳ Compliance wins

Seven centuries of reinforcement

One predictable outcome

Culturally enforced consumption ritual

What if fewer participated

Proof without price

Opt out

Choice

//

Repost this ⇄

//

Source: https://lnkd.in/dhdJ5Vzv

//

Follow me for daily posts on emerging tech and growth: https://lnkd.in/gqzS_9Tf

//

taplio

The Battle

Armand Ruiz

Jeremy Prasetyo

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreArmand Ruiz's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJeremy Prasetyo's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Armand Ruiz

Jeremy Prasetyo

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Armand Ruiz's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJeremy Prasetyo's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreArmand Ruiz's LinkedIn Performance