Brian Dordevic

Delivering profitable web design with SEO first approach. Official Google partner.

I started as a $4/hr offshore virtual assistant and became a USA citizen & business owner.

I help you generate more profit with your existing traffic efforts by optimizing conversion rates, improving your site speed & content strategy.

Chief Executive Officer

As the CEO of Alpha Efficiency, I steer the strategic direction of the company while managing an expanding team of 30+ professionals, spearheading growth initiatives, and driving operational efficiency.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) & Achievements:

Team Leadership & Management: Championed a culture of performance and accountability that led to a 35% boost in operational efficiency. Regularly oversee talent acquisition and retention strategies to ensure our team is well-equipped for success.

SEO & Content Management: Supervised the creation and execution of our SEO strategy, which saw a remarkable 60% surge in organic website traffic within six months, augmenting our brand's digital visibility.

Paid Media Strategies: Pioneered the deployment of innovative paid media campaigns, resulting in a 50% increase in brand awareness and a 30% rise in customer acquisition, significantly expanding our market footprint.

Performance Benchmarking: Developed and implemented performance benchmarks to ensure constant progress. The systematic monitoring of these metrics brought about a 20% improvement in overall productivity.

Stakeholder Management: Successfully maintained robust relationships with key stakeholders, attaining a 90% satisfaction rate, testament to our commitment to delivering value and fostering transparency.

Financial Management: Maintained stringent control over fiscal operations, consistently delivering profitability and surpassing financial objectives by 15% in the previous year, solidifying our position in the market.

This multifaceted role requires a delicate balance of leadership, strategic thinking, and operational excellence. It's my mission to continue propelling Alpha Efficiency forward, driving sustainable growth, and adding value for our stakeholders.

I just hit 12,000 followers on LinkedIn.

• No celebration
• No screenshot
• No dopamine hit

Just a quiet confirmation.

Numbers only matter when they reflect something real.
And this milestone does.

Not because of the count.
But because of the process behind it.

Three years ago, I was “the SEO guy.”

I wrote for Google first.
Humans second.

Intent over attention.

And there is a massive difference.

When someone searches Google, they already want something.
They are raising their hand.

Your job is simple:
Answer better than everyone else.

SEO writing is a drive-thru.

• They order
• You deliver
• The most organized kitchen wins

Social media is the opposite.

Nobody is ordering anything.

You are competing with Netflix, Slack pings, TikTok, and mental exhaustion.
You have to create hunger where none existed.

That shift humbled me.

I had to unlearn structure.
And relearn persuasion.

I stopped asking, “Is this optimized?”
And started asking, “Does this land?”

I studied storytellers.
Not marketers.

I watched how anticipation is built.
How tension is held.
How emotion carries ideas further than logic ever could.

Slowly, something clicked.

I stopped obsessing over keywords and started chasing clarity.
I stopped tracking backlinks and started tracking behavior.
I wrote for humans first.

Ironically, my SEO got better too.

Growth stopped feeling fragile.
It started feeling inevitable.

Not because of hacks.
But because I kept showing up when it made no sense.

When I was tired.
When clients were on fire.
When posts got buried.

I still wrote.

That consistency built trust.
Opened conversations.
Closed deals.
Changed how I see the game entirely.

I used to understand how content works.

Now I understand why it sticks.

This is not explosive growth.
It is earned growth.

And at this pace?

Increasing follower count is 100% irrelevant.
Changing lives and removing fiscal anxiety is.
Only focus is on providing value and getting paid for it.

It is alignment plus consistency plus time.

Because once you understand how humans work, you stop chasing reach.

And start building a life that compounds.

Helping Law Firms increase AI & Local SEO visibility to maximize client intake. | Add 7-Figures worth of cases per year from organic traffic. | My Local Gap Calculator tells you how much you lose every month

AI is not the problem. Your incentives are. AI is not going to use itself.

If you think your boomer salary is going to save your company, you are dead wrong...

The problem is that those that know how to use AI, are building companies not making themselves poor in a job.

They won't work for a salary when they can print 7-figure years. If you think this is an exaggeration, you lack imagination. 

Offer a cut of the pie to those with a brain, or get left behind.

Need help transforming your employees into AI machines? 

Reply with TRANSFORM and we'll talk.

Not being in top #3 on Google Maps costs you 7-Figures per year in lost deals.

This is how you climb to the top and get that massive revenue share:

• Fast Site
• High Quality Backlinks
• Local citations optimized
• Content written to convert
• Topical Authority Map that tells Google you know your stuff

If you want to know how much you're leaving on the table, click on the link in the comments. We'll tell you exactly how many leads are there for your industry.

I don’t know who needs to hear this but...

You need $0 down to start an online business.

• Free AI = DeepSeek
• Free Landing Pages = Carrd
• Free Video Hosting = YouTube
• Free traffic = Social Media Profiles

Poor people have bad imagination. Get creative.

You've seen the posts:

"I don't even use Google anymore." (These numbers are scary...)

Big talk.

But what does the data actually show?

Google went from 8.5 billion searches a day to 13.7 billion.

More people are Googling than ever.

Need help getting on the most powerful AI engine on the planet?

I'm taking 2 new clients in February. If your company does over $3 million per year, your business is qualified for growth.

Some call it AIO...

Others call it GEO...

Old timers want to cling on to SEO...

I say to all of them.

Get.
More.
Backlinks!

Ask me how if you want ones that move the needle.

No alternative text description for this image

Every few years, marketing declares another rivalry:

Radio vs. TV.
TV vs. digital.
PR vs. content.
SEO vs. AI.

But reality doesn't do clean cuts.

The so-called replacement consistently resolves as reinvention.

And this is how it looks in real time:

1. SEO Has Been “Dying” Since the Early 2000s

Two decades of predictions haven’t stopped search growth. They’ve only exposed how often tactics expire while demand continues to shift.
https://hubs.la/Q03ZKW2P0

2. Marketer’s Favorite Hobby: Declaring Things Dead That Still Print Money

Radio died. TV died. PR died. Email died. And yet they’re all still here, evolving while the industry chases the next funeral headline.
https://hubs.la/Q03ZKWZR0

3. The Fastest Way to Lose Narrative Control in AI Search

When brands avoid specifics, generative engines treat it as a gap that needs to be filled, and they fill it fast.
https://hubs.la/Q03ZKXVN0

4. AI Marketing That Actually Held Up in Production

Instead of chasing novelty, these teams treated AI as plumbing. The outcomes were faster execution, cleaner workflows, and measurable gains.
https://hubs.la/Q03ZKYMB0

5. Google’s December Core Update Has Landed

Now comes the hard part: understanding whether your current visibility is stable, temporarily tolerated, or already on borrowed time.
https://hubs.la/Q03ZKWH70

The illusion of replacement hides continuity of control.

We hype "new" systems as total takeovers, and lose focus on what really works.

If you want to see where your next opportunity hides, let me tell you in a call here: https://hubs.la/Q03ZKY9j0

SEO is officially in its “Facebook 2018” era.

Back then, Facebook lost millions of visits and businesses fled to Google for safety.

Now, that safety net is gone too.

Seniors are already planning for a 40% drop in search traffic over the next few years.

(No more hoping-against strategies)

And once traffic decline becomes a planning number, not a fear, everything shifts. 

Let's get into what happened last week:

1. Publishers Are Planning for a 40% Traffic Loss

Search was supposed to be the stable channel. Now publishers are reallocating headcount, formats, and revenue models around their decline.
https://hubs.la/Q03_LWQM0

2. Google Is Teaching People How to Read Curiosity

Google is now actively teaching users what to explore next while they’re still figuring out what they’re interested in.
https://hubs.la/Q03_LYSv0

3. Two Content Economies Are Emerging (Exposure No Longer Pays the Bill)

For 20 years, publishing meant visibility in exchange for knowledge. Now answers stay inside machines, and content creators are being told to accept less.
https://hubs.la/Q03_LXB50

4. Your Best Buying Signals Never Make it to the CRM

Deals expand right before they close. New voices enter, urgency rises, and the most valuable signals never make it into the CRM that’s supposed to catch them.
https://hubs.la/Q03_LWmH0

5. The Social-to-Search Halo Effect SEO Isn’t Measuring

Not all demand starts with a query. Some of it starts with a feeling that sends people searching days later. Ignoring it means letting curiosity resolve on someone else’s terms.
https://hubs.la/Q03_LZxs0

We’ve moved past organic guarantees.

Today, reach depends on systems that can actively shape demand:

AI for discovery.
Ads for paid attention.

I'll show you what that setup can actually do for you. 

Pick a time: https://hubs.la/Q03_LVZR0

New Year’s Eve is behind us.

I started January 5th with a work sprint. One rock. One focus.

Here’s what separates people who adapt and those who don’t:

Most people blame external pressure. 

• War
• Gas prices
• Difficult year

Very convenient. 

Because then you don’t have to examine your own decisions.

But tough times don’t define you. You define how you respond to them.

In every downturn, a small group does exceptionally well. They didn't ignore reality. They adapted faster.

What separates them? 

Structure.

For me, 2025 was one of the best years on record. Most of that traces back to one decision: focus on recurring revenue.

Before that, my business was fragile. Revenue came in bursts. Planning felt theoretical. Every month was a reset.

That realization didn’t come from scrolling. It came from forcing the numbers to tell the truth.

Here’s what most people get wrong about planning:

They plan to feel organized, not to make tradeoffs.

Unrealistic plans create false confidence. Ignoring your capacity creates burnout. Never adjusting creates quiet failure.

The solution? Quarterly planning.

Long enough to set direction. Short enough to correct mistakes before they compound.

A real rock solves an active problem, changes future options, and creates second-order effects. If it doesn’t do all three, it’s not a rock.

Most ideas get eliminated at this stage. Nice-to-haves don’t change the game.

The cost of continuing as usual:

Busy weeks. Incremental progress. Another year where effort increases faster than leverage.

Poor planning doesn’t fail loudly. It fails quietly.

Planning isn’t about controlling the future. It’s about creating structure that allows good decisions to emerge.

The people who do well aren’t waiting for clarity. They create it.

Let’s build that structure together.

Did you know that 88% of urgent clicks go to companies located in Google's Maps Tri-Pack?

If your business is not located in first 3 spots, you are missing on fastest profit on the internet. (Here's how to easily climb to the top):

1. Fix your citations
2. Get fresh reviews (from Google Local Guides)
3. Make sure content of your site is optimized for Local SEO
4. Don't forget to double check your phone number is working

These may sound simple, but roadblock up to 7 figures annually of free orgaic traffic.

Want to learn how much revenue you're leaving on the table? 

Check out our Google Profit Gap Calculator, and ensure you take proper action.

Remember when buying online took around 20 minutes across 5 sites?

Google just shrank it to 10 seconds on one screen:

Customer asks about rugs → sees Rugs USA's 20% off → taps buy.

Curiosity hits search. Wallet hits empty.

(Keep reading for more brain-tickling updates)

1. Google’s Commerce Update Redefines the Buyer's Journey

New commerce tools link AI-driven research directly to checkout, offers, and retailer-controlled experiences inside Google Search and Gemini.
https://hubs.la/Q03-FkDM0

2. SEO in 2026 Looks a Lot Like a YouTube Strategy

AI Overviews are pulling answers from video like it’s primary evidence, turning YouTube into the center of modern SEO.
https://hubs.la/Q03-FkFx0

3. 230 Million People Already Ask ChatGPT About Health

Now OpenAI is formalizing that behavior with a locked-down Health environment, signaling a shift from casual health questions to sustained, data-grounded use.
https://hubs.la/Q03-F8-L0

4. Google Says “Stop Writing for AI” (Even If It Works Today)

Many teams are restructuring content to “please AI,” but Google just went on record saying this shortcut might age very badly.
https://hubs.la/Q03-Ff4G0

5. AI Search Is Solving the Question, Not the Market

"A feature designed to ensure completeness becomes a bug when completeness overrides utility." 
https://hubs.la/Q03-Fk_40

Google now owns the journey end-to-end. 

Profits chase whoever controls that unified experience.

Secure top visibility before Q1 slips: https://hubs.la/Q03-FcdY0

How many AI agents are currently working for you?

Co-Founder @ Musemind (Global UX Agency) & Mentor Lane | $4.5B+ Revenue Impacted | 300+ Happy Clients Worldwide | UX, CX, Product & Service Design | People Leader & Mentor.

3× Co-Founder | CEO at Musemind GmbH | CDO at Musemind Global | CPTO @ Mentor Lane | Ex – Telenor Group, AirAsia Group, Central Group, and Delivery Hero.
I didn’t start in design to make things look good.
I started to make things work for people, and for businesses.

Design isn’t just what you see.
It’s what you feel.
And what moves you to act.

For 18+ years, I’ve helped companies turn ideas into experiences that connect, inspire, and convert. From VISA, Tamara to visionary startups, across telecom, e-commerce, aviation, AI - I make products matter.

Here’s what I do:
⤷ Build human-centered products & services that users love
⤷ Turn insights into strategies that drive growth
⤷ Innovate at the intersection of UX × AI
⤷ Improve conversion, retention, and lifetime value
⤷ Boost NPS, CSAT, and customer loyalty (CX)

Proven impact:
- $4.5B+ revenue influenced
- NPS up 170%+
- Task completion from 50 → 95%
- CSAT/CES 3 → 4.5+
- Customer complaints cut by 50%
- CLTV, AOV, retention & conversion improved at scale

Why it works:
Design with empathy.
Decisions backed by data.
Impact measured in results, not buzzwords.

My Journey:
12 years at Telenor Group mastering product, service design, and growth.
Then Delivery Hero, AirAsia Group, Central Group (the parent company behind iconic & luxury premium retailers like KaDeWe, Selfridges, Rinascente, De Bijenkorf  and Globus) — leading UX, Customer Experience (CX), insights, and strategy at scale.

Today, I bring this experience to:
🌐 Musemind — global UX/UI Design Company
🌐 Mentor Lane — mentorship platform for future leaders

What excites me:
- Unlocking product potential that actually moves the needle
- Growth-hacked, user-centered experiences that scale fast
- Human-first, omni-channel products people love
- Innovating where UX × AI meets real business impact
- Boosting metrics that matter: CLTV, AOV, retention & conversion
- Mentoring future leaders to grow with clarity and purpose

📩 DM me to collaborate, discuss UX × AI strategy, or mentor future leaders.

Rasel Ahmed

I’ve noticed a growing blind spot in product design.

Teams keep designing for “everyone.”

But quietly ignore their fastest-growing users.

They focus on:

Trendy visuals
Dense layouts
Hidden navigation
Clever interactions

But aging users struggle with:

Low contrast
Tiny text
Overloaded screens
Unclear flows

That’s why this carousel exists.

It breaks down how aging actually affects users
and what designers must change in 2026 to keep products usable.

You’ll learn:

Why this is a business decision, not charity.
How vision, cognition, and interaction change with age.
What to fix in typography, layout, navigation, and content.
How designing for older users improves UX for everyone.

No accessibility jargon.
No “just make it bigger” advice.
Only practical UX fundamentals that scale.

Swipe this before you:

Redesign another interface
Ship a “clean” but confusing UI
Assume accessibility hurts conversion

Because good UX doesn’t chase trends.

It ages well.

Repost this carousel if it shifts how you think about UX.
Or drop a question in the comments, happy to discuss.

CEO & Co-Founder, Musemind GmbH | CPTO & Co-Founder, Mentor Lane | Top 1% Creator | Driving $4.5B+ Impact by Scaling AI × UX, Product & CX for 350+ Global Brands | Mentor & Growth Catalyst

How to design for ageing users

What’s the biggest accessibility myth in product design?

That deaf users are a “small edge case.”

While you think about that
↳ here’s the reality most teams miss:

1. Deaf does not mean one type of user.
2. Hearing loss is a spectrum, not a switch.
3. Most deaf users don’t use sign language.
4. Lip reading isn’t a reliable solution.
5. Sound-only UX quietly breaks everything.

This carousel isn’t about adding captions at the end.

It’s about changing how you think while designing.

Designing for deaf users forces you to:

Stop assuming perfect conditions
Stop relying on sound as a crutch
Start designing:

- Clearer
- Calmer
- More visual experiences

And here’s the interesting part:
When you design this way, everyone wins.

Better signals.
Less friction.
Stronger UX overall.

Accessibility isn’t charity.
It’s design maturity.

That’s it. That’s the carousel.

Now tell me:
What’s one accessibility assumption you realized you were making without noticing?

Co-Founder & CEO @ Musemind GmbH | $4.5B+ Impact | Scaling UX, Product & CX for 350+ Global Brands | Co-Founder @ Mentor Lane

How to design for deaf users in 2026!

UX design is dying in 2026?!

At least… the version of UX we’ve all been used to.

I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately.

The screens we design for today?
They won’t stay the center of everything for much longer.

Because UX is slowly moving from what people see…
to what they feel.

In 2026, design won’t just live inside a screen.
It’ll live in moments.
In emotions.
In invisible interactions.

And honestly… that shift is already happening.

Here’s what’s coming:

Zero UI.
AI-assisted design.
Emotion-driven experiences.

Designers won’t just design interfaces anymore.
We’ll design intelligence.
We’ll design feelings.

No more click-based journeys.
No more flat visuals.
No more lifeless minimalism.

2026 is all about:

Smarter AI.

Human-centered emotion.

Interfaces that disappear into real life.

So if you’re still focused only on screens…
You might be designing for the past.

👇 Check out my latest carousel to see what’s next for UX in 2026.

Quick question:
What do you think UX will look like when screens are no longer the main interface?

Top #2 Design Leadership Influencer 🇩🇪 | CEO & Co-Founder, Musemind GmbH | CPTO & Co-Founder, Mentor Lane | Driving $4.5B+ Impact by Scaling AI × UX, Product & CX for 350+ Global Brands | Growth Catalyst

UI UX Design Trends 2026

Most UX designers don’t know how to read a screen.

Here is the part no one likes to admit:

A clean UI does not mean a usable product.

This mobile dashboard proves it.

Everyone talks about:

- Colors.
- Spacing.
- Layout.

But almost no one talks about screen anatomy.

And that is where real UX clarity starts.

When you break a screen into parts, you see everything.

Each part has a job.
Each part guides a decision.
Each part removes or adds friction.

Most teams never inspect these layers.
They jump straight into polishing pixels.
They miss the hidden structure that drives behavior.

But the truth is simple.

If you do not understand screen anatomy
You cannot improve the experience.

Because users never see “a page.”
Users see:

- Components.
- Hierarchy.
- Clarity.
- Confusion.

Great UX happens when every block earns its place.

Nothing extra.
Nothing confusing.
Nothing competing.

When that happens:

The screen feels lighter.
The steps feel faster.
The decisions feel easier.

This is why UX anatomy matters.
It shows what the user actually interacts with.
It shows what needs fixing first.
It shows why the experience works or fails.

The best designers don’t redesign everything.
They fix the parts that create the most friction.
They think in:

- Systems.
- Structure.
- Load.

Because real UX is not magic.
It is the intentional design of every section.

P.S. Want the full UX anatomy breakdown of this screen? 
I will post it next day.

If you think AI is just for image generation, 

you're leaving $$$ on the table ( you can't afford to miss this post )

After testing Nano Banana Pro on real UI/UX work,
I noticed ONE thing:

Designers who use it differently gain a huge edge.

The usual problems we face:
(guessing UX improvements)

Slow iterations:
(manual audits, endless feedback loops)

Time wasted on mockups and localization:
(rebuilding the same things again and again)

The results?

Slower design cycles
Weaker UX decisions
Missed opportunities to stand out

So I started using Nano Banana Pro as a UX accelerator.

A few ways it changes the game:

- Screenshot-based UX annotations
- Faster redesign concepts from real products
- Pixel-perfect mockups in real environments
- Smarter localization and accessibility ideas

Truth is:

AI won’t replace designers.
But designers who use AI well will replace those who don’t.

You can design the old way.
Or design with an unfair advantage.

What’s your move?

P.S. These are real workflows we’re actively using at Musemind.

5 Ways to use Nano Banana Pro in UI UX!

I don’t believe better design = less effort.

You might think I’m wrong. But hear me out.

I’ve watched this experiment where people ignored an escalator
and chose stairs instead.

Not because it was easier.
Not because it was faster.

But because it was fun.

The stairs were designed like a piano.
Every step made music.
Every step felt playful.

Kids used it.
Adults used it.
Elderly people used it.

And suddenly…

The “harder” option became the obvious choice.

Quick takeaway first, then the real lesson:

1. People don’t hate effort
2. They hate boring experiences

This experiment comes from The Fun Theory by Volkswagen.

And it proves something most products still get wrong 👇

Great UX doesn’t always remove friction.
Sometimes, it rewards it.

When an experience is:

Enjoyable
Emotionally engaging
Playful by design

People will:

Choose it willingly
Spend more time
Come back without reminders

Even if it requires more effort.

This applies to:

Product onboarding
Habit-forming features
Customer journeys
Internal tools
“Boring” workflows

If your product needs:

Constant nudges
Push notifications
Artificial urgency

You don’t have a motivation problem.
You have an experience problem.

Design isn’t about making things easy.
It’s about making things worth doing.

(Repost if you believe great UX is felt, not forced ♻️)

P.S. After 15+ years in UX, this lesson never fails:
People remember how your product made them feel,
not how efficient it was.

I want to be honest with you for a minute.

Hear me out if you’re not getting promotions.
Or if you feel like you’re working hard but not moving forward.

I’ve spent 17 years in UX.

Designing.
Leading teams.
Running a design agency.
Mentoring designers at every level.

And over time, one thing became very clear to me.

Some designers move forward faster.
Some feel stuck, even while doing good work.

The difference usually shows up before the design starts.

That’s why this carousel matters.

If you’ve ever felt like:

You’re doing the work, but not gaining trust.
Your ideas don’t land the way you expect.
You’re seen as execution, not a thinking partner.

You’ll relate to this.

Quick takeaway before you swipe, then the deeper lesson:

Impact doesn’t start with screens.
It starts with thinking.

Inside the slides, I’ve shared a simple thinking system I use as a UX lead and CEO.

You’ll learn:

What to think about before opening Figma.
How to connect design decisions to real goals.
How to speak in a way stakeholders understand.
How to design with clarity, not guesswork.

No jargon.
No heavy theory.
Just practical thinking you can use immediately.

Spend a few minutes here.
This can change how you grow over the next year.

If this helps you think differently,
Repost it so another designer can grow too.

If you’ve made it this far, I would like to know: 
What’s the biggest thing holding your career back right now?

How Top 1% Designers Think Like CEOs

UI UX has changed a lot in the last 5 years.

And the shift is bigger than colors, grids, or trends.

(You might want to save this)

UX used to be about screens.
Now it’s about systems that think.

AI didn’t just add new tools.
It changed how users decide, trust, and interact.

Good UX today isn’t only about usability.
It’s about clarity in uncertainty.

The best products now feel:

Adaptive
Explainable
Respectful
Human

Ever used a product that felt smart
But still made you feel in control?

That’s not magic.
That’s intentional AI UX.

Most teams rush to add AI features.
Very few design the experience around them.

And that’s where things break.

In this infographic, you’ll learn:

✓ How AI changes user expectations
✓ Why trust is now a UX problem
✓ What designers must explain, not hide
✓ How to design when outcomes aren’t certain
✓ The UX patterns emerging in the AI era

This isn’t future talk.
This is already happening.

Swipe through the glossary
↳ and upgrade how you think about UI UX in 2026.

♻️ Repost this so you don’t lose it.

This is my favorite kind of DESIGNER! 🤣

You know the one…

The “I do everything” designer.

UX? Yes.
UI? Yes.
Research? Yes.
Branding? Yes.
Strategy? Yes.

Therapy for stakeholders? 
…Also, yes.

Basically…

A full design department in one human body.

Sounds impressive, right?
But here’s the funny part…

Most of the time, it’s not excellence.
It’s just confidence wearing a black turtleneck.

Because UX and UI are two completely different worlds:

One is psychology.
One is visual craft.
One is systems.
One is aesthetics.

Mastering both at the highest level?

Possible.
But claiming it casually?
That’s where the comedy starts. 😄

And honestly…

It sets unrealistic expectations for teams, clients, and the industry.

Design is not about being everything.
Design is about being real about what you’re great at.

So if you’re a designer reading this…

Pick your strength.
Build depth.
Then grow into the other.

That’s how true experts are made.

Have you met the “I’m the best at everything” designer?

Drop your funniest encounter below 👇

I’ll appreciate every ♻️reshare with your fellow designers.

===
Hey, I’m Rasel Ahmed, Co-founder of Musemind and Mentor Lane.
If you need product design that solves real problems, just DM me.

Design isn’t art when money is involved.

That shift changed everything for me.

Early in my career, I focused on what was popular.

Styles. 
Patterns. 
Buzzwords.

Clients liked it.
But they questioned every invoice.

What most teams still get wrong:

Chase what’s trending.
Copy competitors.
Optimize visuals before value.

That creates work that looks expensive
but feels optional.

Here’s what actually moves the needle…

Understand:

How the business makes money.
Where users hesitate.
What decision the product must drive.

Then design for that.
Nothing else.

My rule after 17+ years in UX, CX, and product work:

Business problem first.
User friction second.
UI last.

When your work protects revenue,
pricing conversations disappear.

Good design doesn’t need defending.
It proves itself.

(I learned this the hard way, after years of being “too flexible”)

💡Pro tip: If your work can’t be tied to a business outcome in one sentence, it’s vulnerable.

Hope this helps someone level up faster.

P.S. Repost ♻️ if you’ve felt this shift in your own work.

I have just one suggestion for all UX designers in 2026.

“Quit UX as a career.”

Unless…

You are willing to design for people who:

Never complain.
Never raise tickets.
Never join feedback calls.

This is where most UX work quietly fails:

We listen to the loudest voices.
We design for decision-makers first.
We call it “user-centered” and move on.

Now the real standard for UX in 2026:

Prioritize clarity over cleverness.
Design for people who struggle to speak up.
Treat accessibility as a responsibility, not a feature.

If a user cannot explain what is wrong,
Your design must explain itself.

That is not empathy theater.
That is real UX.

(I wish this mindset were non-negotiable earlier in my career)

💡Pro tip: If accessibility, usability testing, and edge cases are not built into your process, you are shipping assumptions, not experiences.

Hope this challenges the right people.

P.S. UX + responsibility in one lesson.
Repost ♻️ if this hits home.

CEO & Co-Founder, Musemind GmbH | Top 1% Creator | $4.5B+ Business Impact | Scaling UX, AI × Design, Product & CX for 350+ Global Brands | CPTO & Co-Founder, Mentor Lane

How to Use Gemini 3 Pro to Analyze Your UI Design

Here’s a simple, practical workflow I use:

Every designer has faced this:

The UI looks clean.
The screens feel polished.
But something still doesn’t convert.

Users hesitate.
Flows feel confusing.
Feedback sounds vague.

That’s where AI-assisted UI analysis helps.

Here’s how to do it properly:

Step 1: Start With Real Screens

Not Dribbble shots.
Not random concepts.

Use real product screens.
Focus on actual user flows.

- Login
- Onboarding
- Checkout
- Core actions.

Garbage input always gives garbage feedback.

Step 2: Export With Intention

Export screens as images.
PNG or JPG works best.

Keep labels visible.
Avoid half-finished versions.
Clarity matters more than quantity.

Step 3: Clean the Noise

Before uploading, review everything.

Remove unused variations.
Drop old experiments.
Keep only final, connected flows.

Think like a reviewer, not a designer.

Step 4: Ask the Right Questions

Don’t just upload and hope.

Be specific:

“What usability issues do you see?”
“Where might users get confused?”
“What feels heavy or unclear?”

Good prompts unlock good insights.

Step 5: Spot Patterns, Not Opinions

One comment can be ignored.
Repeated feedback is a signal.

Look for:

- Friction points.
- Confusion.
- Hierarchy problems.

Patterns matter more than details.

Step 6: Structure the Feedback

Ask for summaries.
Ask for priority-based issues.
Ask for simple tables or lists.

This turns raw feedback into action.

Step 7: Design With Confidence

Now you’re not guessing.
You’re fixing real problems.

Improve clarity.
Refine flows.
Strengthen hierarchy.

That’s how AI becomes a design partner, not a shortcut.

If you’re still reviewing your UI only by gut feeling,
you’re leaving clarity on the table.

Save this.
Try it on your next screen.
And tell me what surprised you most.

♻️ Repost to help your network.

Follow Rasel Ahmed, Co-Founder of Musemind and Mentor Lane.

Most products in 2026 will face lawsuits. 

Unless…

They built it with color-blindness in mind.

Accessibility mistakes are quiet.
Very quiet.

No error messages.
No angry emails.
Just lost users.

We fixed this for a 9-figure biz. 

This client thought everything was fine.

Clean UI.
Nice colors.
Modern layout.

But… conversions dropped.

We tested one thing.
“Grayscale.”

And everything broke.

Errors disappeared.
Buttons blended.
States looked identical.

Not bad design.
Just invisible design flaws.

So we changed how signals worked.
Not just color.

Icons.
Text.
Contrast.
Structure.

Nothing fancy.
Just thoughtful UX.

And then?

Forms worked.
Drop-offs reduced.
Users trusted the product again.

That’s why this carousel exists.

Color-blind users aren’t edge cases.
They’re:

Real people.
Paying customers.

Accessibility isn’t charity.
It’s product maturity.

Design isn’t about taste.
It’s about clarity.

If you design products, remember this.
Color should support meaning.
Not carry it alone.

Make UX work without color.

Then add beauty.
That’s real design.

If this helped you rethink color,
repost the carousel ♻️

P.S. Most accessibility bugs hide in plain sight.

Design for Color-Blind Users!

Stop paying $10,000 to fix avoidable UX mistakes.

That only happens when…

You build pages that:

Look great but don’t convert.
Attract traffic but repel action.
Sound smart yet confuse users.

This is where most landing pages quietly fail:

Design before understanding intent.
Add sections instead of removing distractions.
Optimize aesthetics and forget outcomes.

The real rule of landing page UX:

One page. 
One goal.
One clear message above the fold.
One CTA that never competes with itself.

If a user needs to think,
Your page is already losing money.

Good UX isn’t about tricks.
It’s about ruthless clarity.

(I learned this after watching too many “beautiful” pages flop)

💡Pro tip: If your landing page can’t explain itself in 5 seconds, no amount of traffic will save it.

Hope this saves someone a painful redesign budget.

P.S. This infographic is the exact checklist I wish I had earlier.
Repost ♻️ if this hits home.

Most designers won’t survive the next wave of UX.

Not because they lack talent.

But because they refuse to adapt.

The truth is simple.
UX is changing.
And it’s changing fast.

Design isn’t just about flow or pixels anymore.
It’s about:

- Adaptability.
- Systems that learn.
- Working with AI, not against it.

The best designers now think differently.
They:

- Use data.
- Experiment faster.
- Build smarter.

This new era rewards curiosity.
It rewards speed.
It rewards those who never stop learning.

UX 2.0 isn’t the future.
It’s already here.

If you’re still designing the old way, you’ll feel it soon.
If you’re learning how to design with intelligence, you’ll lead the change.

Save this post.
Study it.
And share it with the ones who still think “AI will replace designers.”

Because it won’t.
It’ll only replace the ones who don’t evolve.

Are your skills future-proof or stuck in the past?

UX 2.0 Playbook for Designers!

I keep seeing the same career plateau in design.

Talented designers.
Great portfolios.
Fast early growth.

And then…
They stall.

Not because they aren’t good.
Not because they stopped working hard.

But because everything they know came from doing,
not understanding why they’re doing it.

Early in my career, I felt that ceiling too.

I was shipping clean interfaces, getting praise, and moving up.
But bigger problems kept exposing gaps:

Explaining decisions to stakeholders.
Designing beyond trends.
Thinking in systems, not screens.
Leading other designers with confidence.

That’s when something clicked for me.

Execution can take you far.
Foundations are what keep you growing.

Over 17+ years, as a design lead, agency founder, and mentor to hundreds of designers, I’ve seen this play out again and again.

The designers who keep rising aren’t just skilled.
They understand design at a deeper level.

They know:

Why users behave the way they do.
How psychology shapes interaction.
How research informs decisions.
How design connects to business, not just visuals.

That depth doesn’t come from tools.

It comes from structured learning, critical thinking, and theory-backed practice.

That’s why this conversation matters.

Not to devalue self-taught designers.
Not to gatekeep the industry.

But to be honest about long-term growth.

If you want to:

Lead teams
Influence strategy
Defend your decisions
Design beyond trends
Build a career that compounds

You need more than taste.

You need a foundation that grows with you.

That realization changed my career.
And it’s changed the careers of many designers I’ve mentored.

Curious how others see this.

Drop your experience in the comments
or repost if this reflects something you’ve felt but couldn’t name.

Most costly product mistakes start with a beautiful design.

If you can’t afford to waste money, this is for you👇

This is what happens when the design is pretty: 

Everyone loves the UI.
Stakeholders approve it instantly.
Development moves fast.

And then it fails.

Not because:

The team lacked skill.
The execution was bad.

But because the idea was never tested.

You polished before you learned.
You designed before you validated.
You committed before you questioned.

Low-fi prototypes prevent this.

Help you test thinking, not visuals.
Make bad ideas cheap to kill.
Remove ego from early decisions.

In this carousel, I break down:

When low-fi prototypes actually matter
What they’re NOT meant to test
The 5 most common low-fi prototype types
Best practices teams usually skip

If you’ve ever built the wrong thing really well,
Swipe this carousel before opening Figma 👇

5 Common Low-Fi Prototypes and Their Best Practices

I’ve seen it happen again and again.

Most people don’t get the results they expect from design.

This is not because:

The design was bad.
Anyone wasn’t working hard.

It usually comes down to one thing:
The work is focused on outputs, not outcomes.

Last week, I was talking with a designer.
Smart. Fast. Always busy.

He said something that stuck with me:

“Once the designs are handed off, UX is basically done, right?”

That mindset is everywhere.

Screens get shipped.
Flows get approved.
Tickets get closed.

Everything looks productive on the surface.

But then comes the real question:

Did anything actually change?
Did users behave differently?
Did the product improve?
Did the business see results?

That gap is the difference between output-focused UX and outcome-focused UX.

Output-focused UX measures success by what gets delivered.
Outcome-focused UX measures success by what actually changes.

This infographic breaks that difference down in a clear, practical way.

You’ll see:

Why approval is not the same as impact
What changes when UX owns results, not just deliverables
Why outcomes are harder, but that’s where real value lives
Why shipping more design doesn’t automatically improve UX

If you’ve ever:

Felt busy but unsure of your impact
Delivered great designs that didn’t move metrics
Struggled to explain design value to leadership
Wondered why good design didn’t fix the product

This is for you.

Output delivers design.
Outcomes deliver value.

Once you see the difference, you can’t unsee it.

Go through the infographic.
If it changes how you think about UX, ♻️repost it.
If you’re somewhere between output and outcome, drop a comment.
Happy to talk.

Q1 is where most UI/UX careers quietly fail.

And ONE main reason is:

“Wrong focus at the wrong time.”

(You might want to save this)

Most beginners start the year chasing:

Trends.
Tools.
Fancy UI.

That feels productive.
But it creates chaos by Q2.

Q1 isn’t about doing more.
It’s about doing the right 3 things in the right order.

1. Strong UI doesn’t come first.
Clear thinking does.

2. Portfolios don’t work because of pixels.
They work because of logic.

3. Opportunities don’t show up magically.
They show up when people see you consistently.

As an agency owner, here’s what I see every year:

Designers who fix foundation → win later.
Designers who skip it → feel stuck all year.

That’s why I put together this beginner-friendly Q1 plan.

In this carousel, you’ll learn:

✓ What to focus on in Q1 (and what to ignore)
✓ How to build a portfolio clients actually respect
✓ Why visibility matters more than perfection
✓ The exact Learn → Build → Show cycle
✓ How to set up the rest of 2026 properly

This isn’t motivational talk.
This is execution clarity.

Swipe through the carousel
↳ and give your 2026 a clean start.

♻️ Repost this so you don’t forget your Q1 focus.

3 Step Q1 Plan for UI UX Designers!

I almost got trapped canceling a product last week.

And the irony is, I design for a living! 😂

Let that sink in.

- I knew where to look
- I knew the tricks
- I still felt stuck

That’s when it hit me 👇
This isn’t bad UX.

This is unethical UX.

And most people don’t even realize it’s happening to them.

Every day, users are being:

Nudged into things they didn’t choose.
Exhausted trying to cancel.
Shamed for clicking “No.”
Confused by pricing.

I’ve seen this from the inside, too.

Deadlines. Growth pressure.

“Just make the button smaller.”
“Let’s test this later.”

That’s how unethical UX sneaks in.

Not through villains.
Through shortcuts.

So I broke down 5 simple steps I personally use to evaluate UX ethics.

Without theory
Without fancy words
Without pretending design is always “pure.”

Just practical checks you can actually use.

Ethical design isn’t soft.
It’s smart business.

That’s the real message of this carousel.

P.S. If this made you rethink even one screen you’ve shipped, please repost it.
Someone else needs to see this before they get tricked.

taplio

The Battle

Brian Dordevic

Rasel Ahmed

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreBrian Dordevic's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRasel Ahmed's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Brian Dordevic

Rasel Ahmed

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Brian Dordevic's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRasel Ahmed's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreBrian Dordevic's LinkedIn Performance