I’ve spent my career leading creative teams and building brand stories that connect from Hulu, T-Mobile, Samsung, Dignity Health, Dunkin’ and Jack in the Box. 

My work lives where emotion meets innovation, and lately, that means embracing the incredible power of Generative AI to reimagine what’s possible.

I believe in using AI as a creative amplifier, not a shortcut, empowering tools that free creatives to focus on the story, the craft, and the spark of the idea. Whether it’s scaling brand storytelling, launching employer brands, or helping a team unlock their next big idea, I love the moment when imagination becomes motion.

Alongside storytelling and design, I’m deeply experienced in performance creative - concepting, testing, and scaling campaigns built to drive measurable growth across social, digital, and video platforms. My data-driven approach ensures every creative decision connects back to outcomes, using insights to refine messaging, optimize formats, and increase conversion and engagement.

A few career highlights I’m proud of:

• T-Mobile – Led cross-functional teams across online and offline communications for the "Uncarrier", delivering engagement lifts of 30%+.

• Hulu – Helped reinvent campaign production for episodic employee stories that are "Powering Play," tripling creative output while cutting turnaround times nearly in half.

• Samsung – Brought the EVP story "Own the Unknown" to life with visuals and motion design, delivering 250+ formats in four weeks.

• Dunkin’ – Used influencer content and social vertical video to spark a 57% surge in applications.

• Jack in the Box – Built a dynamic content system powered by generative design and geo-targeting, driving 50M+ impressions and a same-store sales lift.

I’m passionate about blending storytelling, design, data, and emerging tech to create work that resonates…not just because it’s smart or scalable, but because it feels alive. And I love helping teams do the same: empowering creatives to explore, experiment, and create what’s next.

Core Skills: Creative Direction • Storytelling • Brand Strategy • Employer Branding • Performance Creative • Generative AI • Data-Driven Design • Creative Technology • Creative Ops • Leadership & Mentorship • Adobe Creative Cloud • Firefly • ChatGPT • Sora 2 • Higgsfield • Runway • Midjourney • ElevenLabs • Google Labs • Veo 3.1 • Canva • Kittl • HeyGen • Descript

Bruce Carey

There's a weird comfort in chaos. 🌀 I used to think I needed everything mapped out before I could start. 

The right brief, the right team, the right mood. But the best work I've been part of started with a mess. A half-baked idea. A deadline that felt impossible. A team that didn't quite fit together, at least not at first. 🤝

It's funny, the things you try to avoid are often the things that push you further. 🚀 I'm not saying I love the stress. I don't. B

ut I do love what happens when you stop waiting for perfect conditions and just start. Sometimes, the mess is the point. Or at least, it's where the good stuff hides. ✨ You know what I mean??

undefined undefined

AI Creative Director | Generative Design & Innovation Leader

There are days when leading a creative team feels like herding cats 😺. Other days, it's more like being the cat, curious, distracted, chasing after things no one else can see.

I used to think my job was to have all the answers. But now I know that more often, it's about asking the right questions, or just making space for someone else's eccentric idea to breathe 💡.

The best moments aren't when everything goes according to plan. They're when someone surprises you, or when the room gets quiet because everyone's thinking, really thinking, about what comes next 🤔.

It's messy. Sometimes it's frustrating.

If I'm honest, I still get nervous before big pitches. Still worry I'm missing something obvious. But maybe that's part of what keeps it interesting. You never really arrive. You just keep moving, keep creating and making...and keep learning how to listen 🚀.

I keep coming back to this idea: perfection is boring.

There’s something about a story with a rough edge, a design with a little friction, a campaign that doesn’t quite fit the mold. It sticks with you. It feels alive.

AI can polish anything until it gleams, but sometimes I want to see the brushstrokes. The fingerprints. The places where someone took a risk and it didn’t land perfectly, but it landed honestly.

Maybe that’s what we’re hungry for now. Not just seamless experiences, but ones that remind us there’s a human on the other side. Someone who tried, stumbled, and kept going.

I don’t know, maybe I’m just tired of the algorithmic shine. Or maybe I just miss the feeling of being surprised.

Either way, I’ll take a little imperfection over predictability any day.

Curiosity isn't a faucet you can turn on. Some days, it's flowing non-stop. 🔍 Other days, nada, no matter how hard you look...

In creative work, I've noticed that when curiosity fades, energy dips with it. The work becomes routine, ideas dry up, and even the best teams feel stuck.

But when curiosity sparks, even for a minute, everything shifts ⚡. A random question, a strange headline, an offhand comment in a meeting, suddenly, you're digging deeper, seeing opportunities you'd have missed.

You can't force curiosity. But you can make space for it. Pause when something feels odd. Let yourself follow weird questions. Encourage your team to share out-there ideas 💡.

It won't always work, and that's fine. The point is to follow where curiosity leads, even if it looks strange at first.

What's the last thing you got curious about at work? Did it take you anywhere unexpected? 🤔

Do you notice how perfect AI polish feels...so empty? ✨ I'll take rough edges any day. Doodles without the bezier curves. Songs with cracks in the voice. Photos a bit blurry. Stories told with real voices.

We're told AI will make everything seamless and flawless. But when things are too smooth, it feels like something's missing...Real connection comes from imperfection. From that human touch. That's what makes work feel alive. 🤝

So I'll keep choosing the messy, real parts over spotless perfection! 🎨

There's a weird tension in creative work right now. On one hand, we have more tools than ever. AI, automation, data that can predict what people want before they even know it themselves 🤖. On the other, there's this ache for something real. Something that doesn't feel like it was assembled by a committee of machines.

I catch myself toggling between the two. Chasing efficiency, then craving a little chaos ⚡. Wanting to impress, then wanting to connect 🤝.

It's exhausting, honestly. But maybe that's the point. Maybe the future isn't about choosing sides, but learning to live in the middle. To let the tech do its thing, but not let it drown out the real, wonderful, unpredictable parts of being human 🌱.

Some days I get it right. Some days I don't. But I'm starting to think the struggle is where the good stuff lives ✨.

Curiosity is a strange thing. It's supposed to be this endless well, but some days it just dries up. I'll sit in a meeting, nodding along, and realize I haven't asked a real question in ther meeting. Not out loud, anyway. 

It's easy to get comfortable, to let the routine do the thinking for you. But then something small breaks the pattern...a weird headline, a new voice in the room, a project that doesn't fit the mold. 🌀

Suddenly, I'm awake again. The questions come back, and with them, the urge to poke at things, to see what's underneath. 🔍

I wish I could bottle that feeling. Or at least remember how to find it when the days get heavy. 🌧️

Maybe it's about giving yourself permission to not know. To admit you're lost, or bored, or just plain stuck. That's usually when the good stuff starts to surface.

Curiosity isn't a given. It's something you have to fight for, especially when everything around you is pushing for certainty. I forget that more often than I'd like to admit. ⚡

Sometimes I wonder if we're all just pretending to know what we're doing.🤔 I've been in office rooms where everyone nods along, but you can feel the uncertainty hanging in the air. Nobody wants to be the first to say, I don't get it. Or, this isn't working.

But the older I get, the more I respect the people who are willing to admit when they're lost. Or when they're scared. 🗣️

Uncertainty isn't a weakness. It's the starting point for something new. 🌱 I wish I'd learned that sooner. I spent years trying to look like I had it all together. Now, I'm more interested in what happens when we drop the act. 🎭

It's not comfortable. But it's real. And sometimes, that's enough.

🍯🐻 Happy National Winnie the Pooh Day! 🐻🍯Celebrating the honey-loving bear who taught us about kindness, curiosity, friendship, and the power of a good snuggle. Pooh always said it best: “Sometimes the smallest things take up the most room in your heart.” 💛 Here’s to simple joys and big hearts today.
#WinnieThePoohDay #PoohBearWisdom #HeartwarmingMoments #SimpleJoys

🩳🔥 Happy International Sweatpants Day- get comfy y'all! 🔥🩳 Whether you’re channeling Rocky sprinting up the Philly steps in full training sweats 🥊💥…or The Dude sipping a White Russian in maximum-comfort mode 🕶️🥃… today is the day to celebrate the true hero of modern life: sweatpants.
Comfort. Confidence. Inspiration. Sweatpants contain multitudes. 😄 Honor the day (and night!). Get comfy! #InternationalSweatpantsDay #ComfortMode #RockyVibes #TheDudeAbides #LinkedInAfterDark

Curiosity is a strange thing. It's supposed to be this endless well, but sometimes it just... dries up. 🤔

I used to think I was naturally curious, but lately I've realized it's something you have to feed. Not with big, dramatic gestures, but with small acts. Reading something outside your comfort zone 📚. Asking a question you're a little embarrassed to ask. Letting yourself be a beginner again.

It's uncomfortable. But it's also where the best ideas hide. 💡

I wish I could say I do this every day. Truth is, I fall into ruts like anyone else. But when I remember to nudge myself out of autopilot, even just a little, things start to shift. 🔄

Maybe that's all it takes. A little discomfort, a little wonder, and the willingness to not know for a while. 🌱

Does everything online looks "too perfect" and doesn’t feel real anymore? 🤔 AI is cranking out polished content every minute. Our feeds are packed with flawless graphics, clever headlines, and data-driven stories. 

But sometimes it feels like the spark is missing.

The best creative moments aren’t engineered. They come from late-night pushes, team brainstorms, things that are messy and risky and eccentric as hell. 🎨

Tech moves fast, but real storytelling still starts with a human. AI can remix and polish, but it can’t replace that raw, honest touch...the part where you don’t know if your idea will land or flop. ⚡

It’s tempting to chase perfection. But the work that sticks with people is usually the one that’s a little rough around the edges. The pitch that made you sweat. The sketch that wasn't perfect. The idea you almost gave up on. 📝

In a sea of synthetic content, embracing a little honest mess might be the boldest thing you can do. 🚀

🧙‍♂️📚 Happy J. R. R. Tolkien Day! 📚🧙‍♂️ From Middle-earth to Mount Doom, Tolkien showed us the power of imagination, friendship, and courage...and that even the smallest person can change the course of the future. 🌋✨
This evening is perfect day to revisit "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy on streaming for the next 9 hours before work on Monday...my precious!!! #TolkienDay #MiddleEarth #MyPrecious #Storytelling #LinkedInAfterDark

I've been thinking about the word authentic. It gets thrown around so much it almost stops meaning anything.

But then I see a piece of work that feels true...raw, a little unpolished, and it hits me. That's what I'm hungry for. Not the perfect story, but the one that feels like someone actually lived it. 🎬

It's hard to make space for that kind of honesty. There's always a voice in the back of my head telling me to clean it up, make it safer, more universal. But the stuff that sticks with me, the stuff I remember, never plays it safe. 🔥

I guess I'm still learning how to let the rough edges show. To trust that people can handle the mess, maybe even need it. 🤔 It's a risk, every time. But I'd rather take that risk than make something forgettable. 🎯 Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who feels this way. Probably not... #BeTrue #Authenticity

Lately, I've been craving the old analog days. Letraset press type, Xerox machines, sketch pads, X-Acto blades... Not because I think AI tech is the enemy, far from it. 

I love what AI can do, the way it cracks open new possibilities 🤖. But there's something about the friction of making things by hand that I miss ✍️. The smudges, the crossed-out lines, the way you could see the work in the work.

Now, everything is so clean. So fast ⚡. You can generate a hundred options in seconds, but sometimes it feels like none of them really belong to you. Like the machine is doing the heavy lifting, and you're just curating the results.

I know that's not entirely fair. AI is a tool, not a replacement. But I worry about creators losing the fingerprints, the little imperfections that make something feel alive. Maybe that's nostalgia talking. Or maybe it's a reminder to slow down, to leave a little room for the mess. To let the process show.

I don't have a solution. Just a stubborn hope that we can keep the human in the loop, even as the tools get smarter. Maybe especially then ✨.

Technology is supposed to make things easier, but sometimes it just makes things...LOUDER. 🔊 There's so much noise out there. 

So many tools promising to streamline, optimize, automate. And yet, the work that sticks with me, the stuff that actually moves people...never feels like it came from a machine. It's rougher around the edges. Sometimes it's a little awkward. Sometimes it's a lot awkward. But it's always unmistakably human. 🤝

I think of AI as a collaborator, not a replacement. Like a really smart assistant who can fetch things, organize chaos, maybe even surprise you with a connection you hadn't seen. But it can't feel for you. It can't care. 

That's still our jobs. And honestly, I'm glad for that. Because if everything sounded the same, I'd probably stop listening. 

So here's to the weird, the imperfect, the stuff that doesn't quite fit. That's where the real stories live. 🌱✨ (At least, that's where I want to spend my time.)

Ever notice the best ideas show up when things get messy? 🎨 

Real stories, the kind people remember, rarely come from a flawless plan. They grow out of mistakes. Wrong turns. Half-ideas that nobody takes seriously at first. 💡 Some of my favorite work started as something awkward or unfinished. Sometimes the detour is the actual path.

Perfection is overrated. The details we can't control, the mess we try to avoid, that's what makes storytelling feel real and human. 🤝

Maybe we need to give ourselves (and our teams) more permission to let the process stay a little chaotic. 🔄 Because when you loosen your grip, that's when something interesting happens.

Your best ideas commonly show up when you're not even trying. 💡 You sit down, ready to be creative... and nothing. Blank page, empty head. 

But take a walk 🚶♂️ to Starbucks, watch some YouTube, play laser with my cats, and suddenly, BOOM, ideas everywhere...

I used to fight it, thought I was slacking off if I wasn't "being productive." Now I just let my mind wander and see what happens. Turns out, forcing creativity is the fastest way to kill it. ❌ 

So if you're stuck, don't stress. Go do something else for a while. Let your brain breathe!

🙏 Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. today: "Only in the darkness can you see the stars." , MLK 

Today is a reminder that even in challenging times, hope shines through people...through kindness, courage, and the belief that together we can build something better. 🤝 Here's to lifting each other up, choosing empathy, and continuing the work he championed. 💪❤️

I keep coming back to this idea of imperfection...as a kind of rebellion. ✨

Everything around us is getting smoother, faster, more optimized. The algorithms know what we want before we do. The polish is impressive, but sometimes it feels like it's sanding down all the interesting bits.

I find myself drawn to the things that don't quite fit. The awkward pauses, the offbeat choices, the moments that make you stop and wonder if it was a mistake or a stroke of genius. 🎭

Maybe it's just my way of pushing back against the tide. Or maybe it's a reminder that the best stories aren't always the most efficient ones.

I don't know. Some days I wish I could just embrace the polish and be done with it. But then I see something beautifully flawed and I remember why I started doing this in the first place. 🌱

Perfection is overrated. Give me the cracks, the quirks, the things that make you look twice. That's where the real magic lives. ✨

Some businesses grow fast but scale chaos.
Others run profitably for 20 years – yet collapse the moment the owner steps away.
And some look successful on the outside but are quietly fragile on the inside.

I’ve seen all three. And I’ve lived them.

My journey spans 25+ years in consulting, private equity, and building companies of my own – from international construction ventures to sports and consulting firms. I also grew up in a family business, which I watched succeed and later struggle when succession was never planned.

The pattern is always the same: businesses that appear strong often hide fragility. Too dependent on the owner. Too exposed to shocks. Too hard to transfer.

That’s why I created the Future-Proof Business System – the global standard for making companies durable, transferable, and valuable.

I help owners and founders eliminate fragility, protect culture, and design companies that thrive without them – and sell at a premium when the time comes.

The outcome isn’t just growth. It’s independence, valuation uplift, and a legacy that outlives the owner.

👉 Connect if you want to assess how future-proof your business really is.

Marco Grüter

The old playbook is quietly destroying valuation in founder-led businesses.

Not because founders are doing something wrong.
But because the rules changed, and most companies didn’t.

The traditional founder-led model was built for a simpler era.

Clients stayed loyal.
Talent stayed longer.
The competition was local.

Processes lived in people’s heads.
Profitability hid a lot of fragility.
That world is gone.

Today, I see respected, profitable businesses losing value every year without noticing it.

Not in revenue.
In structure.

Here’s the uncomfortable reframe:

What made your business successful 10–15 years ago is often what makes it fragile today.

The old playbook looks like this:

→ Growth driven by relationships and founder reputation
→ Processes living in experience, not systems
→ Pricing based on effort, tradition, or hours
→ Decisions concentrated at the top
→ Sales dependent on the founder
→ Succession treated as “later”

It works.
Until it doesn’t.

Investors, buyers, successors, and even top talent now look for something very different.

The future-proof playbook looks like this:
Leadership over heroics

 Clear decision rights, governance, and cadence so the business doesn’t escalate by default.

> Systems over memory

Documented workflows, digital processes, and clarity that survives people changes.

> Value-based pricing over effort

Margins and valuation are engineered, not hoped for.

> Transferability by design

The business runs without the founder at the center.

> Relevance as a strategy

 Clear positioning, narrative, and AI-ready ways of working.

This is why so many founder-led businesses feel heavy even when they’re profitable.

They’re running a modern company
on an outdated operating model.
And the market is already pricing that in.

Summary line:

Profitability hides fragility. 
Architecture reveals value.

Your Next Step:

To determine whether your business is still operating on the old playbook, download the playbook. 
Link in the comments.

Future-Proof Business | Follow to build a business that is Valuable, Transferable, and Relevant | Founder, Investor, Advisor

How to get ahead of 99% of founder-led businesses:

Fix pricing before you fix anything else.
Most founders treat pricing as a finance topic.

It’s not.
It’s a strategy decision.

A positioning decision.
And one of the biggest drivers of valuation.

I’ve reviewed hundreds of service businesses.
The pattern is always the same:

Revenue looks solid.
Clients are satisfied.

Yet margins are under pressure, and growth feels heavy.

Not because the business isn’t good.
But because pricing was never designed.

It evolved.

Here’s the wrong way pricing happens:

→ Custom offers that create complexity
→ Revenue tied to hours, effort, or goodwill
→ Founders pulled into every pricing exception
→ Prices set years ago and “adjusted occasionally”
→ Discounts used to close uncomfortable conversations

This doesn’t just hurt margins.
It creates founder dependency.

Because when pricing lacks clarity, everything escalates.
The better approach looks like this:

Price value, not effort:
Selling hours keeps you trapped. Selling outcomes creates leverage.

Standardise offers:
Clarity reduces complexity and protects margin.

Build predictability:
Recurring elements stabilise cash flow and valuation.

Remove the founder from pricing:
Clear logic enables delegation.

Let structure drive valuation:
Buyers pay for predictability, not heroics.

The reframe most founders miss:

You don’t increase valuation by working harder.
You increase it by engineering margins and predictability.

Summary line:
Pricing isn’t about charging more.
It’s about building a business that’s worth more.

Your Next Step:
If you want to see where your pricing strategy is quietly leaking value, DM “Playbook” and I’ll send you the Future-Proof Business Playbook.

🔁 Repost if you know a leader who leads with consistency and respect.
 ➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on building a future-proof, founder-optional business.

Most growth problems aren’t operational. 
They’re personal.

Many founders try to scale by fixing systems, hiring more people, or working harder.

But the real ceiling shows up much earlier.

It’s the moment when the business has outgrown the founder’s identity, not their competence.

I wrote a long-form essay on why founders don’t stall because of processes. 
But because the role they’re still holding onto no longer fits the company they’ve built.

If growth feels heavier than it should, this will resonate.

👇 Read it in the article below :

Why the real limit to scale is the founder’s self-image, not the business itself At some point in a founder’s journey, progress slows in a way that is

Open article: Founders Don’t Hit Operational Ceilings. They Hit Identity Ceilings. by Marco Grüter • 4 min read

Founders Don’t Hit Operational Ceilings. They Hit Identity Ceilings.

87% of founders are optimising businesses that were never designed to last.

More efficiency. Better tools. Smarter KPIs.
Yet the business still feels fragile, founder-dependent, and hard to scale.

Here’s the reframe most owners miss:
Future-proof businesses are built, not optimised.

Optimisation assumes the underlying architecture is sound.
But if the structure is wrong, improvement just accelerates fragility.

I learned this the hard way.

In my family’s third-generation company, everything looked fine on the surface:
Strong reputation. Solid revenue. Loyal clients.

One problem:
The entire business depended on one person.

When life forced change, optimisation didn’t save it.
Only a full structural rebuild did.

That experience shaped everything I’ve built, scaled, advised, and exited since.
And I see the same pattern repeating today.

The wrong way most founders try to “future-proof”
Squeezing margins without fixing pricing logic

Adding tools without fixing decision rights

Hiring more people without leadership depth

Chasing growth while ignoring transferability

Optimising operations that still rely on the founder


It feels productive.
But it doesn’t create value, optionality, or resilience.

Because the right approach is architectural, not incremental.

A future-proof business is deliberately built around 3 outcomes:

1) Value
Clear valuation logic, predictable revenue, and margin resilience.

2) Transferability
The business runs without you. Governance, leadership, and documented systems.

3) Relevance
Clear positioning, modern offers, digital and AI-aligned execution.

These are not “initiatives.”
They are design principles.

Miss one, and the entire structure weakens.

That’s why incremental improvement isn’t enough anymore.
Markets move faster. Buyers are sharper. Talent has options.

The old playbook rewards effort.
The new one rewards architecture.

If your business can’t run, scale, or sell without you,
Optimisation is just disguised risk.

If this resonates, start with clarity:
Know where your structure is strong
And where it’s quietly leaking value.

That’s how future-proof businesses are built.

Repost if you know a founder who needs this.
Follow Marco Grüter for more frameworks on building scalable, sellable businesses.

This €5M Swiss service firm didn’t grow to €8.2M by working harder.
It grew because the architecture of the business changed.

Most founders obsess over operations.
But revenue doesn’t scale because you do more.

Revenue goes up when structure changes.

Here’s what actually happened in this case.

The situation (before)

A highly respected fiduciary and accounting firm in Switzerland.
Strong clients. Solid reputation. Busy founder.

But structurally fragile.

The business was:

Dependent on the owner for every key decision

Priced on tradition, not value

Operationally outdated

Invisible to buyers and successors

Profitable, yet undervalued

At €5M revenue, the founder believed the business was “successful.”

On paper, investors saw risk.

The wrong moves most founders make

This is where many firms stall or worse, grow in the wrong direction:

Hiring more people without clarifying roles

Adding tools without fixing governance

Pushing sales without fixing pricing logic

Talking about exit without building transferability

That path leads to higher revenue with lower valuation.

What changed structurally (not just operationally)

Over 18 months, five deliberate structural shifts happened:

1. CEO identity shift

The founder moved from operator to architect.
Decisions stopped flowing through one person.

2. Governance installed

Clear decision rights. Leadership cadence. Accountability.
The firm could now run without constant escalation.

3. Value-based pricing introduced

Margins increased without increasing workload.

4. Digital and AI-enabled workflows

Processes were documented.
Knowledge moved out of people’s heads and into systems.

5. Succession and investor readiness built early

Optionality increased.
Risk perception dropped.

The result

Revenue grew from €5M → €8.2M

Margins increased from 15% → 23%

EBITDA multiple expanded from 3.5x → 6x

Estimated valuation: €11.5M

Same market.
Same team.
Different structure.

Revenue is an outcome.
Valuation is a design choice.

If your business depends on you, it’s not an asset.
It’s a risk.

If you want to understand what your business is actually worth and what is structurally holding it back start with clarity.

👉 Take the Future-Proof Business Assessment.

🔁 Repost if you believe growth should increase valuation not dependency.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more real case studies on scaling, succession, and building businesses that work without you.

If your business felt harder to run last year, it’s not because you’re slipping.

It’s because you’re still thinking like the operator you used to be
Not the CEO your business now requires.

Founders don’t struggle because they lack skill.
They struggle because the business evolves…
But their thinking patterns don’t evolve with it.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth:

You can’t future-proof a business with yesterday’s thinking.

The CEOs who scale aren’t superhuman.
They’ve simply upgraded how they think.

Here’s what that shift looks like
And how you can start today.

Save this for later.

7 signs you’re leveling up your CEO thinking.

And one move to practice each.

1) You stop making decisions… and start designing decision systems.

Not: “What should I do?”
Instead: “What’s the decision framework my team can use without me?”

🟩 Today: Take one recurring decision and turn it into a rule, threshold, or criteria list.

2) You think in operating models, not tasks.

Not: “Let me fix this.”
Instead: “What needs to change so this never lands back on my desk again?”

🟩 Today: Identify one recurring issue and ask:
“Is this a process problem, a role problem, or a clarity problem?”

3) You reduce noise instead of absorbing it.

Not more Slack channels.
Not more check-ins.
Not more heroic firefighting.

🟩 Today: Tell your team:
“Summaries only. Signal over noise. Key actions first.”

4) You ask for context before you give direction.

Because single-sentence questions lead to misalignment.
And misalignment leads to rework.

🟩 Today: Before responding, ask:
“What data, constraint, or objective am I missing?”

5) You treat plans as drafts and refine with discipline.

Growth isn’t linear.
Your plans shouldn’t be either.

🟩 Today: Take one initiative and ask for three alternative versions:
Leaner, faster, and higher-leverage.

6) You break complexity into clarity.

You don’t react to chaos.
You reorganise it.

🟩 Today: Write down the messy business problem.
Then ask:
“What are the 3–5 steps that actually matter here?”

7) You use frameworks to expand your thinking, not to replace your judgment.

Great CEOs don’t outsource decisions.
They structure them.

🟩 Today: Ask yourself:
“What would the argument for this decision be?
What would the argument against it be?
What’s the smartest middle path?”

Skills compound.
Structure compounds.
CEO thinking compounds.

Pick one of these seven today.
Future-you will solve problems with the same tools
But with a completely different mind.

🔁 Repost to help another founder upgrade their thinking.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter, for more insights on building a valuable, transferable, future-proof business.

📌 The Future-Proof Business Playbook is now featured on my profile.
Start there if you want to build a business that scales without depending on you.

Harsh truth:
65% of founder-led companies operate without a real strategy system.

Most owners don’t notice. 
Until something breaks. 
And when it does, it’s never a small thing.

Lost momentum. 
Valuation pressure.
It’s leadership gaps. 
Decision bottlenecks. 

What I repeatedly see in due diligence, succession planning, and scaling phases:

→ Founder dependency silently kills valuation
→ AI tools amplify chaos if processes aren’t clean
→ Succession is not a future topic; it’s a present risk
→ Due diligence exposes everything you postponed fixing

The surprising insight?
Most companies already have what they need.

The problem isn’t missing tools. It’s missing architecture.
That’s why I created the Future-Proof Business Playbook.

It is a practical, step-by-step architecture for modernising a business using the tools founders already run on:

→ financials
→ workflows
→ the existing team
→ market positioning
→ the leadership model

And I also turned it into an 8-week Cohort for business-owners and CEO’s who want:

→ Higher valuation instead of surprises
→ Stronger positioning instead of noise
→ Transferability instead of dependency
→ Clear structures instead of heroic effort
→ Strategic freedom instead of constant pressure

The real breakthrough is not novelty. It’s accessibility. Where business owners redesign their business architecture, before the market, investors, or life forces them to.

Founders who understand this shift will operate differently this year.
A future-proof business isn’t built by working harder.
It’s built by designing better.

See the link to the Future-Proof Business Playbook in the Comment Section.

🔁 Repost to keep other founders in the know.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on building a valuable, transferable, future-proof company.

The best business doesn’t win anymore. The most relevant one does.

Many founders still believe performance alone is enough.
Deliver great work. Keep clients happy. Hire good people.

That used to work.
Relevance is now the deciding factor for clients, talent, and buyers.

I see this across professional services, consulting, IT, fiduciary firms, agencies.
Strong operations. Solid margins. Experienced teams.
Yet growth stalls. Talent is hard to attract. Pricing power erodes.

Not because they’re bad businesses.
But because they’ve become invisible.

Relevance is not marketing fluff.
It’s a strategic asset.

When relevance drops, three things happen fast:

• Top talent chooses more exciting narratives
• Clients default to price comparisons
• Buyers question future demand

This is where most founders misjudge the risk.
The wrong way to think about relevance:

• “Marketing is secondary to delivery”
• “Clients already know what we do”
• “Our reputation speaks for itself”
• “We’ve always done it this way”
• “We’ll update the brand later”

That mindset slowly commoditises even great firms.

The right way is deliberate and strategic.

Relevant businesses are built on three pillars:
Clear differentiation
You don’t just do work. You stand for something specific in the market.

A compelling narrative
Clients, talent, and investors instantly understand why you matter now.

Modern positioning
Your offers, language, and signals align with today’s expectations, including digital and AI readiness.

This is why relevance now drives everything else.

Relevance attracts better talent.
Relevance protects pricing power.
Relevance creates inbound demand.
Relevance signals future readiness to buyers.

And once relevance is lost, it’s expensive to rebuild.

In a crowded market, competence is assumed. Relevance is chosen.

Future-proof businesses don’t wait until growth slows or talent leaves.
They actively design how they are perceived, talked about, and trusted.

Because today, relevance isn’t a branding exercise.
It’s a competitive advantage. 

♻️ Repost this if you believe relevance is the new moat.
 ✅ Follow Marco Grüter me for more insights on founder growth, positioning, and premium brand strategy.

Only 18% of founder-led businesses survive a leadership interruption without major disruption.

I learned why at 6:45 am on a quiet Tuesday.
The office was still dark.

Coffee tasted like clarity.
No emails. No demands yet.

I walked in expecting a normal day.
My COO wasn’t there.

Overnight, a family emergency had pulled her out without warning. No handover. No buffer.

And suddenly…
Every question.
Every escalation.
Every blocked decision.

Came straight back to me.

“Marco, quick question?”
“Marco, who approves this?”
“Marco, how should we proceed?”

By 9 am, the truth was impossible to ignore:

The company looked strong.
But it wasn’t structurally independent.

My first reaction wasn’t panic.
It was disbelief.

Really?

After all the systems I thought I had built?
And that’s the part founders rarely admit.

It wasn’t about the team.
It wasn’t about the COO.
It wasn’t even about the situation.

It was about the architecture.
Or more precisely: the gaps in it.

This is the silent weight many founders carry.
Not during obvious crises.

But in the moment you realise the business still depends on you.
The mental load.

The decision fatigue.
The pressure of being the default answer to everything.

Most founders cope.
Not because it’s sustainable.

But because the company can’t pause while structure catches up.
Here’s the wrong assumption I see again and again:

→ “We’ll document this later.”
→ “Strong people will solve it.”
→ “This is just part of leadership.”
→ “It only works because I’m involved.”

And here’s the better way to think about it:
Design decisions so they don’t escalate by default

Build authority maps, not just job titles
Separate leadership presence from operational dependency

Stress-test the business without you, before life does
Choose architecture when your nervous system wants to save the day

My company wasn’t broken.
It just wasn’t future-proof yet.

Building a future-proof business isn’t ego.

It’s survival.
It’s succession.
It’s protecting the people who rely on you.

And it’s exactly why I built the Future-Proof Business Playbook.

If you want the same clarity I gained that morning, comment PLAYBOOK, and I’ll send it to you.

🔁 Repost if another founder needs to hear this.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on building a valuable, transferable, relevant business.

Founder | Future-Proof Business | Making Companies Durable, Transferable & Valuable | Global Standard for Resilience & Legacy | Entrepreneur, Advisor, and Investor

Only 18% of founder-led businesses survive a leadership

Buyers don’t pay premiums for growth. 
They pay premiums for independence.

8 out of 10 founders think valuation is about revenue, margins, or momentum.
Those matters. 
But they’re not the multiplier.

Transferability is the ultimate valuation lever.
I’ve seen this from every angle. Founder. Seller. Advisor. Investor.

Two businesses can look identical on paper.
Same revenue. Same margins. Same market.

One sells at a premium.
The other struggles to attract serious buyers.

The difference is simple:
Can the business run, scale, and survive without the founder?

From a buyer’s perspective, founder dependency equals risk.
And risk always compresses multiples.
This is where most founders get it wrong.

What buyers quietly discount:

• Revenue tied to founder relationships
• Decisions flowing through one person
• Weak governance and unclear authority
• Undocumented processes and tribal knowledge
• A leadership team that can’t operate independently

Even if the business is profitable, it’s not transferable.
And if it’s not transferable, it’s not a true asset.

Now the other side of the table.

What buyers pay premiums for:
Operational independence
The business performs without the founder’s daily involvement.

Clear governance
Decision rights, accountability, and leadership cadence are defined.

Documented systems
Processes live in SOPs and systems, not in someone’s head.

Leadership depth
A team that can run the business through transition.

Clean handover logic
The company can pass due diligence without chaos.

This is why transferability isn’t a “later” topic.
It directly drives valuation today.

A transferable business attracts more buyers.
Reduces perceived risk.
Expands exit options.
And increases multiples.

If your business can’t operate without you, buyers aren’t buying growth. They’re buying a job. And they won’t overpay for it.

Transferability is not about existing tomorrow.
It’s about building a business that gives you leverage, freedom, and optionality long before a sale.

That’s how valuation is actually multiplied.

Repost this if you’re building for freedom, not just growth.
Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on building businesses that scale without founder dependency.

If Your Team Waits for You, Your Business Isn’t Scalable

Most founders think slow execution is a people problem.
It’s not.

It’s a leadership design problem.

When every decision waits for you:
→ The team pauses
→ Momentum stalls
→ Responsibility blurs
→ Capability quietly erodes

Not because your team isn’t capable.
But because the system tells them to wait.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Teams don’t underperform by accident.
They perform exactly to the level of authority they’re given.

If approval sits at the top,
Learning stays at the bottom.

If direction replaces ownership,
Initiative disappears.

And over time, your leadership team stops leading.
They manage around you instead of through the business.

This is where scalability breaks.

A scalable business doesn’t rely on speed from the founder.
It relies on decision clarity.

• Who decides what
• Within which boundaries
• With what consequences

When decision rights are clear:
→ Teams move without permission
→ Leaders grow through ownership
→ Execution accelerates without pressure

If your absence creates delays,
Your presence is doing too much work.
|
Real leadership isn’t needed everywhere.
It’s being missed nowhere.

♻️ Repost if you’re building a business that moves without waiting
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for insights on leadership design, decision clarity, and founder-optional businesses.

What if the real reason you feel stretched isn’t that you lack discipline

But because the way your business works makes balance impossible?

Founders are told to “find work–life balance.”

But let’s be honest.
The way a founder-led business actually operates makes that advice feel unrealistic.

There were mornings after 14-hour strategy days where I’d drive home in that familiar founder fog.

Pull into my neighbourhood…
And realize I didn’t remember half the drive.

Not because I was careless.
But because my mind was still running the company.

Still processing decisions.
Still carrying the weight that never fully shuts off.

Balance assumes predictable days.
Defined boundaries.
Clear separation.

But that’s not entrepreneurship.

You’ve got client escalations.

Leadership gaps.
Hiring challenges.
Financial decisions that can’t wait.
And messages coming in long after the workday ends.

Your world doesn’t run on symmetry.
It runs on responsibility.

After 25 years working with founder-led companies,
I’ve learned something most leaders never say out loud:

Work and life aren’t separate for founders.
They overlap.

They bleed into each other.
And most weeks, one will pull harder than the other.

That doesn’t mean you’re failing.
It means you’re human inside a business that asks for a lot.

Some weeks, work wins because it has to.
Other weeks, life wins because you need it to.

That’s not imbalance.
That’s reality.
And it’s okay.

The goal isn’t stricter separation.
It’s smoother integration.

Being whole in whichever role you’re in:
• Present when you’re leading
• Present when you’re with your people
• Present when you’re taking space for yourself

What if balance isn’t measured in hours…
But in capacity, clarity, and support?

Here are 3 signs you’re doing better than you think:
• You notice your limits.
 Most founders never pause long enough to recognize overload — you did.
• You still show up with intention.
 Even on the hard weeks, you’re not running on autopilot.
• You care enough to question the idea of balance.
Anyone reflecting instead of blaming themselves is already practicing self-leadership.

These moments aren’t signs you’re struggling.
They’re signs you’re growing into the CEO your business actually needs.

And inside the Future-Proof Business Playbook and the Cohort, this is the exact shift we build:
 
Capacity, systems, clarity, and structure 
So the business stops draining you and starts supporting you.

Because for founders, time isn’t the real currency.
Capacity is.

You’re allowed to design the rhythm that actually supports your life
And your leadership.

Balance isn’t the goal.
Capacity is the strategy.

And you don’t need perfection to thrive.
You need a business that doesn’t consume all of you to function.

🔁 Repost to remind another founder they’re doing better than they think.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on building a future-proof, founder-optional business.

Overthinking doesn’t look dangerous from the outside

But for founders, it’s one of the most expensive habit you can keep.

Not because the decisions are hard.
But because the delay quietly erodes your clarity, your time, and your leadership altitude.

Every day I work with founders who say the same thing:

“I'm not stuck… 
I just need to think this through.”

But thinking isn’t the problem.
Staying in the loop is.

Because every unmade decision creates drag inside a business:

• It slows momentum
• It keeps the team waiting
• It locks you in Operator Mode for longer than your business can afford

And the worst part?
Your brain treats every postponed decision like an unresolved tab.

You might feel productive.
But internally, you’re draining the very bandwidth you need to lead strategically.

Here’s how I see this play out again and again:

1. The Founder Fog

You circle the same decision from different angles
Your mind keeps replaying scenarios
And without realising it your strategic clarity starts to blur

2. The Capacity Leak

The more decisions stay open, the less space you have to think architecturally
Delegation slows
Everything feels heavier than it should

3. The Momentum Kill

Teams don’t stall because they’re confused
They stall because they’re waiting
An unmade decision at the top creates a downstream traffic jam

This is why I tell founders:

- Clarity isn’t found in thinking more.
- Clarity is found in closing loops.

Try this today:

1. Write down every strategic decision you’ve been postponing.
2. Circle the one that is quietly slowing the entire business.
3. Make one imperfect decision today.

Momentum is built by closing loops, not overanalysing them.

Your business and your identity as a leader will strengthen the moment you shift from delaying decisions to designing them.

If you’re ready to evolve from Operator to Architect in 2026 and build a business that grows without depending on you, this is your moment.

Repost this if you’ve felt the cost of delayed decisions more than once.

Follow Marco Grüter for insights on moving from Operator to Architect and building a business that doesn’t depend on you.

Overthinking doesn’t look dangerous from the outside

95% of founders wait too long to think about exit readiness.

Not because they don’t care 
But because they believe it only matters later.

Here’s the truth I’ve seen again and again:

A business becomes future-proof the moment you start building it as if someone else will one day run it.

That shift changes everything.

→ You stop reacting and start designing.
→ You stop operating and start architecting.
→ You stop holding the business together and start making it stand on its own.

And ironically, the more “sellable” your business becomes…
The easier it becomes to run, to scale, and to enjoy.

Exit-Now thinking isn’t about selling today.
It’s about creating optionality, independence, and breathing room tomorrow.

If your business only works because you do, it’s not a business 
It’s a dependency.

But when it becomes valuable, transferable, and relevant without you at the centre…
You finally get back what you’ve been missing: freedom.

Repost if you’re building freedom, not just revenue.
Follow Marco Grüter for clear thinking on designing businesses that don’t depend on you.

There’s a moment in every founder’s journey that almost no one talks about.

It's not about cash flow issues or team layoffs.
It’s not the early chaos.
It’s not scaling pains.

It’s the quiet plateau.

The phase where growth looks stable from the outside,
But the business's structure is slowly outgrowing its founder.

I wrote an article about the silent plateau that keeps 7–8 figure founders stuck:

👉 Why growth feels heavy
👉 Why clarity fades as revenue rises
👉 Why your team still depends on you
👉 And why the real bottleneck isn’t your market, it’s your operating altitude

And what needs to shift to overcome that plateau? 

👇 Read it in the article below :

Every founder prepares for the obvious challenges. Cash flow issues. Team restructures. Market shifts. Operational fires. But almost no one prepares f

Open article: The Most Dangerous Plateau Founders Don’t Recognise Until It’s Too Late by Marco Grüter • 4 min read

The Most Dangerous Plateau Founders Don’t Recognise Until It’s Too Late

Most founder-led businesses look strong on the surface.

But underneath, they rely far more on one person than anyone admits.

My new essay examines the illusion of a strong business and why transferability, rather than talent, drives real valuation, freedom, and legacy.

I break down why founder dependency caps value, how structural flaws hide behind operational success, what investors actually look for, and why fragility is often discovered too late.

If you want to understand what makes a business truly durable and why structure matters more than speed.

👇 Read it in the article below :

By Marco Grüter There is a quiet truth inside founder-led companies that rarely makes it into strategy decks or annual reports. It is the truth no one

Open article: The Illusion of a Strong Business: Why Transferability, Not Talent, Defines Real Value by Marco Grüter • 4 min read

The Illusion of a Strong Business: Why Transferability, Not Talent, Defines Real Value

Pricing Is the Most Underused Lever in Founder-Led Businesses

Why value-based pricing changes more than margins, it changes positioning

Most founders treat pricing like a maths problem.
Costs + margin = price.

But pricing isn’t a calculation.
It’s a strategic signal.

It tells the market:
• Who you are for
• What you stand for
• And where you belong in the competitive landscape

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
If your pricing is conservative, your positioning is too.

Value-based pricing doesn’t just increase revenue.
It rewires how your business is perceived.

When founders price based on value created, three things shift immediately:

1️⃣ You stop competing on effort
Hourly logic disappears.
Outcomes take centre stage.
Clients buy results, not your time.

2️⃣ You attract better-fit clients
Price becomes a filter.
Low-commitment buyers fall away.
Serious decision-makers lean in.

3️⃣ Your internal confidence changes
Teams sell with clarity.
Delivery improves.
Your business starts acting like the premium option it claims to be.

Underpricing is rarely a market issue.
It’s a leadership decision disguised as caution.

The moment you price for value, not fear,
Your business stops asking for permission
And starts setting the tone.

That’s not a pricing upgrade.
That’s a positioning shift.

♻️ Repost if this reframes how you think about pricing
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for insights on building a founder-optional, future-proof business

Succession planning has a branding problem.

Most founders think it means stepping aside.

Selling.
Letting go.

That’s why they delay it.
Here’s the truth:

Succession is not about leaving.
It’s about building options.

Founders who plan early gain:

→ More freedom
→ More leverage
→ More strategic control
→ Higher enterprise value

Not less.
In this article, I break down:

• Why succession is an optionality engine
• The real risk of delaying it
• How succession starts with identity, not org charts
• The shift from founder dependency to founder choice

Read the full article below.

P.S. Repost this if you know a founder who still thinks succession means exit.

Most founders avoid succession planning for one quiet reason: they believe it represents an ending. They associate succession with stepping aside, sel

Open article: Succession Is Not About Letting Go. It’s About Building Options. by Marco Grüter • 9 min read

Succession Is Not About Letting Go. It’s About Building Options.

Founders keep talking about AI like it’s the next competitive edge.

But no one wants to admit how unprepared their business actually is.

Everyone loves the idea of AI transforming operations, sales, finance, delivery.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:

AI doesn’t fix weak systems.
 It exposes them.

Founders weren’t trained to build governance.

Or scalable operating models.
Or data structures that AI can actually use.
Or decision-rights frameworks that prevent chaos.

We were trained to move fast, solve problems, and push through.

So when founders open ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, or any AI tool…
They pause.

Not because they’re “not technical.”
Not because they can’t learn.

But because nobody ever taught them how to use AI inside a business that was never built for it.

There’s no onboarding for that.
No “AI-ready” orientation.
No MBA course that explains where AI plugs into a fragile structure.

And absolutely no guidance on:

– Which workflows must be redesigned before automation
– How AI impacts valuation and transferability
– What governance needs to evolve as systems change
– How to adopt AI without making the business more founder-dependent

So if AI feels inconsistent or overwhelming…

It’s not your capability.
It’s the lack of structure beneath it.

💾 Save this for later.

This is why I built the
Future-Proof Business Playbook
And designed the 8-Week Cohort around it.

Founders don’t need better prompts.
They need architecture.

A foundation that gives them:

→ Cleaner decisions
→ Clearer workflows
→ A leadership model that scales
→ A company that becomes more valuable and more transfer-ready
→ A roadmap that removes uncertainty instead of adding to it

AI should reduce pressure, not create more of it.

But that only happens when the business is structured to hold the improvement.

And if AI has ever felt like one more thing you’re supposed to master…

You’re not alone.
And you’re not behind.

You just haven’t been given the right framework yet.

That’s what the Playbook is for. Download it here: https://lnkd.in/gf6yx4fb

🔁 Repost if another founder needs to hear this.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter, for more insights on building a valuable, transferable, and AI-ready company.

Founders don’t burn out because they’re doing too much.

They burn out because they’re doing the wrong kind of work.
Every week I speak to founders who tell me the same story in different words:

“I feel like I’m working harder than ever, but the business isn’t getting easier.”
And when we dig deeper, it always comes down to this:

They’re still operating like the early-version of their company…
Even though their business has outgrown that version of them.

Here’s what I mean:

At 0-1M revenue, doing everything yourself is survival.
At 1-5M, it becomes a bottleneck.
At 5-20M, it becomes the reason a company stagnates or even collapses.

Most founders know this logically.
But they don’t act on it because of one quiet fear:

“If I step out of the operations and client delivery,  
Will the team deliver at the same standard?”

And here’s the uncomfortable truth:

If you don’t design the business to work without you…
Your team never gets the chance to rise to the standard you want.

This is why I teach founders the shift into Architect Mode:

📌 They replace heroic firefighting with predictable operating rhythms.
📌 Architects don’t scale effort. They scale structure.
📌 They replace assumptions with dashboards, 
📌 and dependency with governance.

And when they do?

The business stops feeling heavy.
Decisions stop being chaotic.
Execution stops breaking every time you’re not in the room.
You finally create the space to move from “busy founder” to “intentional CEO.”

If you’re reading this and thinking,
“This is exactly where I am right now,”
You’re not alone.

Many founders hit this stage.
Few consciously evolve out of it.

But the ones who do?
Their companies become more valuable, more stable, and far easier to lead

If you’re ready to make that shift in 2026…

♻️ Repost this if it resonates it might help another founder realise they’re not broken, just misaligned with their current stage.
➕ Follow Marco Grüter for more insights on evolving from Operator to Architect, reducing founder dependency, and building businesses that are easier to lead and stronger without you.

taplio

The Battle

Bruce Carey

Marco Grüter

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreBruce Carey's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMarco Grüter's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Bruce Carey

Marco Grüter

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Bruce Carey's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMarco Grüter's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreBruce Carey's LinkedIn Performance