CEO / Co-Founder @ RevGen Labs | AI + Sales + Growth Hacking

I'm Christian, Co-Founder at RevGen Labs, a B2B lead generation agency. 

We're solving a critical problem in B2B sales: how to scale cold email outreach with purpose (not spam).

Here's the reality most revenue teams face: 

You know cold email works, but scaling it properly is nearly impossible. 

You're stuck between sending mass blasts that destroy your reputation or spending hours crafting individual emails that don't scale.

The result? Either your outreach feels robotic and gets ignored, or your team burns out trying to personalize everything manually. 

At RevGen Labs, we're building proprietary AI tools that solve the "scale vs. purpose" dilemma. Our technology helps B2B teams send cold emails that feel personal and relevant at any volume - without the spam tactics that ruin deliverability and brand reputation.

We can help you if:

• You're sending cold emails but struggling to make them feel personal at scale

• Your team is burning out trying to research and customize every single outreach

• You want higher response rates without resorting to spammy tactics

• You need to increase email volume while maintaining (or improving) quality and relevance

We've helped 50+ revenue teams transform their cold email approach from "spray and pray" to strategic, purposeful outreach that actually converts. 

If you're ready to scale your cold email efforts the right way - with purpose, not spam - let's connect.

Send me a DM or reach out directly at christian[at]revgenlabs.com

Want to see how we're revolutionizing cold email? 

Check out revgenlabs.com

Christian Oland

STEAL MY 35,000+ Recruiting & Staffing Agency Lead List - FREE
 
I've been sitting on this for a while. Figured it's time to just put it out there.
 
If you are thinking, "Why are local leads different?" here's why:
 
These aren't procurement committees and 6-month sales cycles. These are owner-operated agencies. One decision maker. They trust someone who actually knows their market - not another vendor cold blasting from a spreadsheet.
 
Less competition. Faster close. And almost NOBODY is targeting them right now.
 
Here's exactly what's in it:
 
👉 Owner name + their LinkedIn profile link
👉 Whether they're spending on ads RIGHT NOW
👉 Reviews, ratings, review keywords
👉 Competitors mapped out
👉 Address, hours, whether they're temporarily closed
👉 Whether the listing can even be claimed
 
Why free? Because I can, and if it helps you close one deal - worth it.
 
1. Like this post
2. Comment "Staffing"
3. Send me a connection request
 
I'll send it over personally in the next 24 hrs.

Founder of RevGen Labs | Helping businesses unlock 10x growth through growth hacking and AI

I've been MIA from LinkedIn for the last 2 months.
 
And it was the best thing I did for the business.
 
Got the time I needed. Read 2 books.
 
And actually good ones - which almost never happens.
 
1. Traction
 
Got the rec from Jeremy Chatelaine 🔥 at a Tuesday Triggers session. I don't usually take sales books seriously. Most are just someone explaining how great they are for 250 pages. Painful to read.
 
But this one was different. The book talks about EOS (Entrepreneurial Operating System). It isn't new. Tens of thousands of companies run on it.
 
And I liked it because it's basically a system for stopping yourself from being everything to everyone.
 
Which is exactly what I was doing.
 
2. Built to Sell
 
Written by John Warrillow.
 
The narrative is built around a guy who owns a marketing agency. Makes a couple million a year. Clients own him. Team's a mess. No real exit path.
 
The fix?
 
- Build a Standard Service Offering.
- One thing you do better than anyone.
- Document the process. Hire specialists.
- And stop taking everything that walks in the door.
 
That's it.
 
Between the two, I realized at RevGen Labs we've been building mountains to climb over instead of just... not building them.
 
Already started implementing EOS. Early. Messy. But moving.
 
Got some exciting stuff lined up this year. Stick around... :)

Vishesh Jain 🐼 is booking 20 meetings/day by sending 200 emails/inbox.
 
And as he dropped that message in the Tuesday Triggers group, questions were flying left, right, and centre.
 
(If you are a cold email or lead gen agency owner and want to join Tuesday Triggers, Comment "TT" and I'll add you to the group)
 
Later Vishesh ended up writing a whole post about it. I'll link it below. But first - here's why it works.
 
Most agencies will tell you your campaign is underperforming because of deliverability. Or your copy. Or your targeting.
 
But almost nobody looks at the offer, which is the actual problem.
 
At RevGen Labs, before we send a single email for a client, we do this:
 
We audit everything. Current offers, past attempts, what's been tried before, who they're actually selling to. If we don't have this figured out, we will not make the campaign live.
 
Then we brainstorm 20 to 30 lead magnet ideas. We had a custom GPT trained on every high-performing lead magnet we've seen work. Now we do it via Claude Code. We plug the client's business in and just generate.
 
The prompt: Use /lead-magnet-skill - generate 30 lead magnet ideas for [url]. Filter for offers that trade time, not assets. No PDFs. No courses. No audits.
 
Then we pick the best 3 to 5 and test them.
 
A few things to mention:
 
Nobody really cares about a PDF. Nobody really cares about a course. And definitely, nobody wants a free audit. People don't want their taxes audited. Or SEO strategy. Or Meta ads.
 
The only thing that still converts is your time.
 
→ A call where you actually build something for them
→ A strategy session where they walk away with a real deliverable
 
Whatever the first step of your service is - GIVE. THAT. AWAY. FREEEEE.
 
No-brainer. People know that's worth money. That's why it works.
 
Vishesh figured this out. His offer is ripping his TAM.
 
Link to his post in the comments - worth reading if you're straight-up serious about this. 👇

Your GTM guy books a call for a client. Confirms it. But prospect ghosts. So who's actually responsible - the person who set the call or the person who didn't show up?
 
The EASY answer is to blame the prospect. We don't.
 
Because in almost every no-show we looked at across a bunch of clients, the targeting was fine. The prospect was real. The interest was there.
 
What killed it every time was what happened between the booking and the call. That window is the most neglected part of the entire sales process and it's bleeding show rates dry.
 
Here's what we do at RevGen Labs:
 
[1] Confirmation page - the second they book, they land on a page with a short video of me introducing the company. Case studies. Testimonials. Stats. Just enough to remind them what they said yes to.
 
[2] 24 hours before - we send a helpful doc on deliverability fixes. Something actually worth reading. With Real value.
 
[3] 2 hours before - another short touchpoint. A bit more social proof, a few testimonials. Keeps the call top of mind without being annoying about it.
 
Taylor Haren just did a video on this - he uses Cal.com for the booking workflow, which is worth looking at if you're rebuilding this from scratch.
 
One thing I'll say: don't over-sequence this. There's a version where you're hammering people with 6 emails before a 30-minute call and they show up annoyed. The goal is for them to feel like their time won't be wasted - not like they accidentally signed up for a nurture sequence.
 
If you're doing outbound and booked meetings keep ghosting you, grab some time here: ﻿https://lnkd.in/gkAANh7a

One of the most DANGEROUS beliefs in outbound is believing a trigger will save bad copy.
 
The trigger hype cycle is exactly like NFTs.
 
Lots of noise. But ONLY a few winners.
 
How do I know that?
 
I've watched teams spend weeks on scrapers, Clay workflows, Apify setups. HELL EVEN we did it. All while chasing the perfect trigger.
 
One of the triggers was "website visitor identification." It was supposed to be the MASSIVE unlock. So massive that everyone lost their mind over it.
 
But it worked only if you were pulling serious US traffic.
 
The reality is that triggers are an addition to a working system.
 
And not a replacement for one.
 
We've seen sequences sit at 0.1% reply rate. Same list. Same setup. Change up the verbiage slightly. Suddenly 2-3% reply rate.
 
Just better copy.
 
Find what converts. Then make it smarter.
 
What trigger did you spend the most time building that ended up being a flop?
 
Also, massive shoutout to Smartlead, they've been our partners since the inception of RevGen Labs. I was invited to Smartlead office hours a few months ago, forgot to share the video. You can watch it here ﻿https://lnkd.in/gN8_vGFE

18 months ago if you told me cold calling was still a viable channel I would've said no way.

Now we have a whole team of cold/warm callers.

Took us a while to commit to it honestly. But we did. 

And we figured out pretty quickly that it all comes down to how you clean and enrich your data. We used to string together like a whole bunch of tools, which helped a ton with connect rates. Plus we've figured out some of our own secret sauce along the way.

But the ops side of it was a nightmare. 

Dialer in one tab. Enrichment tool in another. CRM open on the side. Rep finishes a call, has to log it manually, check the email history separately, schedule the follow-up somewhere else. 

By the time they're done with admin - they've lost the momentum from the call.

We were running 5 different tools just to make it work.

But dialing straight out of Smartlead's SmartDialer has made things a. ma. zing.  Deal rate went up by 23%. 

Everything's in one place - call history, email history, notes, follow-ups. As soon as the rep hangs up and it's already handled.

Been using Smartlead since the early days. Vaibhav always delivers. This one's no different.

If you're a Smartlead user already, Smartdialer one's gonna make your life way easier. Thank you thank you thank you.

Check it out here https://lnkd.in/gMbsizd7

Using Claude Code right now is like getting your hands on TikTok back in 2018.
 
Not many people know about it. And even fewer are actually using it.
 
I'd guess maybe 1% of people in GTM have touched it. The rest have heard the name, seen a few posts, but haven't actually opened it.
 
This post is for that group.
 
Here's how to actually get started:
 
There are 4 ways to run Claude Code:
 
[1] The desktop app. Download it from claude.ai. Sign in. If you've used ChatGPT, you already know how this works.
 
[2] The terminal. Follow instructions on code[dot]claude[dot]com
 
[3] Inside an IDE. I use Antigravity.
 
[4] Get the Claude Code extension. If you can't get the Google it - there are a bunch of walkthroughs that'll get you set up in 10 minutes.
 
Pick whichever matches how you already work.
 
Once you're in, the first thing to do is create a CLAUDE.md file.
 
This is your system prompt for the project. It tells Claude what you're building, what tools you're using, what your data looks like, what your ICP is. Without it, Claude is generic. With it, Claude becomes specific to your stack.
 
Think of it like onboarding a new ops person. You wouldn't just say "go build campaigns." You'd explain your tools, your signals, your enrichment flow, your copy frameworks. The CLAUDE.md file is that onboarding doc.
 
Next, use Plan Mode before you build anything. Plan Mode makes Claude think harder, ask better questions, and catch gaps you missed. Start every complex task there.
 
Third, develop your own Claude skills. These are reusable knowledge packs. If you do enrichment a certain way, or build n8n workflows, or have a copy framework that works - save it as a skill. Claude loads only what's relevant per task.
 
One thing most people miss:
 
At the end of every session, tell Claude to update the CLAUDE.md file.
 
The CLAUDE.md file is the brain. Every time you close a session, that context disappears. But if you tell Claude to update the file before you close, it saves what it learned. Next session, it starts from that stored knowledge instead of starting from scratch.
 
Once you learn it, you can build plays like:
 
→ Score and filter against your ICP
→ Find decision-makers via Sales Nav search
→ Enrich contacts across multiple providers
→ Generate personalised copy at scale
→ Push leads to your fav seqeuncer automatically
 
All of this runs from Claude Code.
 
Start with one workflow. Improve it. Deploy it. Then build the next one.

I receive ~ 100 personalized DMs and emails every week.
 
And I don't reply to a single one.
 
They all follow the same pattern. Open with something real - a win, a case study, something off my LinkedIn. Then pitch me something I'd never buy in a million years.
 
Simple rule I live by: I don't reply to messages I wouldn't send to myself.
 
That personalization - the 'saw your post about X' opener followed by an unrelated pitch - people see right through it now. Random triggers don't work anymore.
 
The only thing that matters is the offer. And whether the thing you scraped is a real reason this person would want it right now.
 
Here's how to fix this problem:
 
Before any trigger goes into a campaign, ask yourself:
 
"Why does this signal make this person a good fit for this specific offer?"
 
If you can't answer that in one sentence, the trigger doesn't go in.
 
Because a trigger that's true but disconnected actively signals that the outreach is automated. Prospects clock it instantly even if they can't name it.
 
And almost nobody sending those emails knows that's the reason they're not getting replies.
 
Want to be in a room where top GTM experts talk cold email in depth - with a few jokes thrown in?
 
Comment "TT" and I'll add you to Tuesday Triggers.
 
Cold email and lead gen agency owners only. 👇

Running an agency is not always clean.
 
Fellow agency owners will relate to this one
 
I have been in tough situations where I had to cut costs heavily.
 
I am dead sure some of you have been in situations where the revenue numbers look fine on paper but your gut tells you something is off.
 
- Payroll decisions.
- Tools we thought we needed.
- A hire that made sense six months ago but not anymore.
 
Darn it. It is not a fun process.
 
But going through it taught me some of the most important financial lessons I know.
 
1. Your P&L is a liar.
 
You can have a great month on paper and be one payroll away from trouble.
 
Cash in the bank is the only number.
 
2. Build a document you update every single Monday.
 
- Starting cash >> what is actually in the bank.
- Cash in >> real payments that have cleared.
- Cash out >> everything leaving. Payroll. Contractors. Tools. Etc.
 
3. Collections will bleed you slowly.
 
In a service business the gap between cash and what your books say is almost always a collections problem.
 
4. Before every major financial decision run three scenarios.
 
- Revenue drops 10 percent.
- Revenue stays flat.
- Revenue grows 10 percent.
 
If the bad scenario kills you do not do it.
 
This one framework alone will save you from some very emotional and very expensive decisions.
 
5. Agency owners scale fast and hand out cards with no limits and no policy.
 
- Set spending limits by role instead.
- Do weekly reviews not monthly ones.
- Seven days to catch a mistake means you fix it Monday.
 
No one is born good at running a business.
 
Most of us figure this out after an expensive mistake.

Thanks for having me over Smartlead team. 

Had a blast at the session 🔥 

If anyone is grinding on cold email, outbound, or GTM... you already know what to do. DMs are open.

Stop blowing up your infra with bad data. 

Watch Christian Oland and our panel of outbound experts break down the exact data enrichment systems you need https://lnkd.in/gyUJnzfU

Helping B2B founders grow their personal brand on LinkedIn organically| Social Media Manager at Salesrobot | Building everything from 0

You're reading this because your LinkedIn isn't delivering meetings

You've tried everything to book meetings on LinkedIn:

↳ Sending connection requests 
↳ LinkedIn messages templates 
↳ Posting content

Yet, your calendar remains empty while your revenue targets loom large. 

Each morning, you check your inbox hoping for responses, only to face another day of disappointment.

This frustration is deeper than you might realize...

Every day without enough quality meetings means: 

↳ Your sales team is demoralized 
↳ Your growth projections keep getting pushed back 
↳ Your competitive position weakens as others gain market share 

We've helped 100+ businesses overcome these exact challenges

In the past 4 years, we've transformed LinkedIn into a predictable meeting generator for multiple businesses and agencies just like yours:

↳ Achieving 40%+ reply rates (compared to the industry average of 5-10%) 
↳ Booking 20-30 quality meetings monthly through strategic outreach 
↳ Building systems that deliver results month after month

Our clients once shared your frustrations until they implemented our proven approach.

If you want to book 20-30 meetings per month, book a strategy call with us at https://calendly.com/d/cncd-gd3-8cb or just go do a free trial at salesrobot.co

Sachin Rawat

3 GTM agencies accidentally handed me 900+ warm leads.

Here's how you can also get it:

Every GTM agency and SaaS startup is heavily investing in employee personal branding right now. It started with lemlist, then ColdIQ - and slowly everyone in the ecosystem followed.

Because a high-quality post can create a warm lead list in < 24 hours

Likes. Comments. Shares.

And it does. 

But almost nobody is using it.

I tried this at SalesṚobot.co and failed. Terribly. 

I was just scraping and blasting LinkedIn DMs. 

This time, I did it differently using Trigify.io:

1. Monitor competitor posts - track when top GTM leaders post
2. Filter by relevance - is the post actually about them
3. Filter by engagement - 10+ likes minimum
4. Scrape profiles of everyone engaging
5. Push into SalesRobot/HeyReach.io/Instantly.ai/Smartlead 
6. Start the outreach

Those people already care about what your competitor sells.

Which means they probably care about what you sell too.

So instead of them waiting for a reply from the GTM leaders. 
You can actually reach them first. 

If you want, I can record a short video walking through the social listening and full workflow. 

Comment "LEADS" and I'll send it over.

I write about LinkedIn content, B2B growth hacks, and partnerships | Growth @ Stack Optimise

Has your LinkedIn reach flatlined?

This is the reason why👇🏻

You torched your own reach without even realising it.

And I say that because I did the same thing. So I did some digging and found that it's because of these 3 things (this is my research, do your own due diligence):

[1] Pods

A bunch of creators agree to like and comment on each other's posts every week. Feels smart. Feels like a legit hack. Even I was running pods with 30+ people and watched the impressions climb. Daily. 

But LinkedIn figured it out. How?

Because the same accounts were engaging with my content every single time. And when that happens, the algorithm reads it as artificial engagement and nukes your distribution. 

[2] Generic AI slop

Everyone's churning out Claude-generated lead magnets and LinkedIn post copy daily. I know because I've personally cranked out 100+ pieces of AI content myself. Now I can spot it from a mile away.

And if a human can spot it, LinkedIn's algorithm absolutely can too, which is exactly why your reach is bleeding out.

[3] Zero creativity

Only a few people are coming up with new creative ideas. Others? Zero creativity. Because it's just easier to let Claude do the thinking. The whole feed has started to look and sound identical.

Same hooks. Same formats. Same recycled takes dressed up as insight. (notice the classic Claude copywriting pattern)

The last person who genuinely stopped my scroll was Taylor Haren. Even though parts of it felt AI assisted, the guy put in real effort and had a real point of view. You could feel the difference straight away. And that's what LinkedIn actually rewards. Always has.

So if your impressions are down, be real with yourself for a sec and ask yourself, “When was the last time I made something I was actually proud of?”

We are a tribe of 10,000 members now. Still feels made up.

12 months ago it was < 900.

The journey wasn’t easy. I almost gave up halfway. 

I was stuck at 4K–5K for like... months. 

And I couldn't figure out why.

My own teammates were killing it. 

- 5–6% follower growth every week. 
- 50K+ impressions per week. 

And me? 

- 1% follower growth 
- 5–7K impressions/week 

And oh boy that's not a fun place to be.

So, I spent weekends on content strategies. 

→ Tried posting once a week
→ Tried posting 3 times/day
→ Tried viral templates

And this actually worsened the situation.

My impressions dropped.

But I didn't quit though. 

Kept going. Changed a few things. AND…

At some point it just started working again.

I still don't fully know why.

If you're in that place right now: 

- Posting and getting nothing back
- Watching everyone else grow

I get it. I don't have a magic answer. Nobody does.

Just don't let it make you quit.

Saurav G. took a chance on me before I had anything to show. That mattered more than I can explain. And the whole SalesṚobot.co team.

Divyanshi, Tosin, Georgios, Lohit, Prerona, Anushka - and honestly so many more people who showed up when I wasn't sure this was going anywhere.

Thank you. Really.

Now onto what we're building at StackOptimise ⚙️ with Felix, Penn, and the team. You'll be seeing a lot more of us.

Trigify.io  Jarvis V2 is live and it's a BEAST.

you don't have to set up a social listening search manually anymore.

you can do it with a prompt. 

actually, you don't even have to write one. 

there are built-in prompts, just select one of those. 

i went ahead and tested it.

prompt: i want to monitor every mention of 
your brand name {BRAND} across social. help me set up a search for this, then classify each mention as: advocate (positive recommendation), prospect (someone asking about us), support issue (complaint or problem), comparison (us vs a competitor), or neutral. route each type differently so the right team sees it. Include the post text and author profile link in every notification.

that's it.

came back with all the viral posts.

what's new:

1/ chat with it in plain language.
2/ change search criteria while the agent is running.
3/ multi-channel search - Reddit, LinkedIn, X, YouTube. All at once.
4/ output goes straight into your stack. Slack. Clay. MCP. Wherever you need it.

few clicks. full pipeline.

have you tried Trigify Jarvis V2 yet? If not, give it a shot right now.

I left a comfortable Marketing Lead role at a SaaS company focused on LinkedIn outreach to join a cold-email agency. Here's why I made the switch:

Before I get into my reasoning, let me give you a quick breakdown of how both LinkedIn Dm and Cold email work.

1. Copy

Cold emails need to sound professional and stripped down.
LinkedIn DMs work best when they sound like something you'd actually say.

2. Volume

Cold email = scale. 20-30/inbox/day.
LinkedIn = slower pace. Around 200 new connections/week/profile.

3. Rules

Email success comes from relevance and proof - direct, simple, credible.
LinkedIn success comes from consistency - showing up, commenting, sharing useful content.

4. Follow-up

Email: 3-5 value-led touchpoints. No empty follow-ups.
LinkedIn: max 3 messages, spaced out, keep it social.

5. Tools & Testing

Email: test multiple versions - value, case study, pain question.
LinkedIn: test different DMs at scale, double down on what gets replies.

6. Results & Setup

Cold email: higher volume, lower reply rate, easy to scale.
LinkedIn: smaller volume, higher engagement, harder to scale.

Now here's what this data did to me.

The reply rates on LinkedIn looked great. Impressive. 

But the decision makers - the ones who actually sign contracts, have the buying power - weren't really there.

And when they were, they weren't buying. 

Whereas cold email reply rates are lower.

But the people who reply are serious.

Bigger deals. Higher LTV. Cleaner path to the decision maker.

And then there's multi-threading.

On cold email you can CC a colleague, forward a thread, loop in the whole buying committee in one move.

Try doing that on LinkedIn.

You're tagging people in comments, sliding into multiple DMs. It gets messy. Fast.

If you want to scale outbound, cold email is what you should focus on. 

Want help making it work? Comment "Help" and I'll DM you.

StackOptimise ⚙️

How to build Claude Skills 

(without knowing how to prompt)

Step 1: Prompt until output stops being sh*tty

Start with the task you want Claude to do. Give it references. Give it examples of what good looks like. Do’s and Don’ts.

Keep going until the output is 80% there. 

This takes 10-20 back and forths. Maybe more.

Just keep fixing what's broken.

Step 2: Make Claude do the hard part

Once you've got something decent, tell Claude to analyze the entire conversation.

"Look at everything we just did. What changes made the biggest difference? What guardrails worked? What examples fixed the issues?"

It'll miss stuff on the first pass. So run it again. And again. 

Until every tweak is documented.

Step 3: Structure it like this

Tell claude to convert the document into a skill with five pieces:

- Context (what this skill is for)
- Guardrails (dos and don’ts)
- Phases (how the skill works step by step)
- Examples (real inputs, real outputs)
- Iteration checklist (runs every single time before output)

That last one is what separates a prompt from a skill. The checklist forces consistency.

Step 4: Bake in the self-check

Add a final instruction that makes Claude verify it followed every step before delivering anything.

That's it... :)

Want the template I use to build skills?

Comment "SKILL" and I'll send it over.

I spent 48+ hours reading prompt engineering guides from Google, Anthropic, Clay and ChatGPT. Here's what they all agree on:

6/10 prompts are generic.

"Write me a cold email for a SaaS product."

Well that's only gonna get you a shitty output.

I've read all 4 guides. And this is NOT how they teach us to write a prompt.

Every single guide says the same thing.

I've summarised them into 4 parts:

1. Context

Set the context for the prompt to understand what the conversation is about.

- Who are you talking to.
- What's the situation.
- What does it need to know before it can help you.

Ex: You are an AI assistant evaluating whether a company is a good fit for my product. Here's what my product does and who it's for.

2. Definition

Tell it what you want out. And what you don't.

Format. Length. How it should respond.

Ex: Only output yes or no.

3. Rules

Hard lines. Non negotiables.

- What it must do.
- What it must never do.
- What to default to when it's unsure.

Ex: Default to yes unless clearly excluded. If uncertain, yes.

4. Task

One thing. Clearly stated. At the end.

Not three things. One.

Ex: Now evaluate this company based on the criteria above.

That's the whole thing. Context. Definition. Rules. Task.

Works for cold email. Research. Content. Website crawling. Anything.

---------------

BTW not so happy employee) leaked Claude's actual internal prompts. The ones Anthropic uses to train Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6. Claude Cowork. All of it.

If you want it, comment "Prompt" and I'll send it over.

AI is terrifying.

I'm scared of it.

And if you say you're not, you're lying.

A friend called me last week. Web developer. 6 years experience. His company just laid off 40% of the dev team.

"They said AI made us redundant."

He didn't know what to say. Neither did I.

Everyone is overwhelmed. Pretending they're fine. 

I'm somewhere in the middle. Some days I feel like I'm unlocking superpowers. Other days I wonder if I'll have a job in 2 years.

Both feelings are real. Both are valid.

If you're scared, that's not weakness. That's awareness.

The people who aren't scared aren't paying attention.

So yeah. I'm scared.

But I'd rather be scared and adapting than comfortable and blindsided.

I set Claude Cowork on a task and went grocery shopping with my mom. And I expected it to fail.

- 7 creators
- Their writing styles
- Their best hooks and threads
- The patterns behind their viral posts.

I came back to a bag full of groceries and a swipe file that would have taken me 3 days to build manually.

312 hooks. 12 style breakdowns. 89 content angles.

All organised. Ready to rip.

Here's the sauce:

I opened X. Went to Sahil Bloom's profile. Gave Claude Cowork one task: analyse this creator's writing style, hooks, topics, and what makes their copy hit.

Once it finished, I gave it the list of other profiles.

Then I bounced.

It worked through them one at a time. Opened a profile. Scrolled. Extracted the patterns. Moved to the next. Kept cooking until done.

By the time I was unloading groceries, it had pulled apart 7 creators and built a legit swipe file I can use for the next 6 months.

Content research now doesn't have to eat your entire day anymore.

The process is dead simple:

1. Open a creator's profile
2. Tell Claude Cowork to analyze their style, hooks, and patterns
3. Give it the rest of the profiles
4. Go live your life
5. Come back to a swipe file

try it out and let me know how did it go for you

Attention agency owners: the exact GTM AI agent and automation systems behind a $2.5M ARR business is now available to you.

Devrim Celikay, head of operations at StackOptimise ⚙️, built it. 

I've seen it up close. It's the real deal.

If you've watched your agency grow and felt the whole thing start to crack under its own weight... you already know what this fixes.

Most courses hand you a framework and wish you luck. This one cracks open the actual secret sauce behind StackOptimise - the systems that took StackOptimise to $2.5M ARR without the wheels falling off.

It’s 6 modules. 6+ hours. 

➕ Make. n8n. Agentic AI. RevOps. Claude Code. 
➕ Notion SOPs. 
➕ Plug-and-play templates. 
➕ Ready-to-deploy AI agents. 
➕ And A private Slack full of top GTM operators. 

Sounds too good to be true? I thought so until I took the course. 

Devrim didn't just study this stuff. He ran it. Every day. For real clients. 

Then decided to record the whole thing so you don't have to figure it out the hard way.

Apply here: https://lnkd.in/dwbQhbzg

mac mini and macbook pro sales weren’t driven by apple ads…

they were driven by twitter bros discovering OpenClaw, Claude code, and losing their s*it

This was the X-factor that helped Guillaume Moubeche spike lemlist  to $20M ARR without any funding and zero reputation. 

His personal brand. 

His distribution was locked and loaded before his product even shipped.

Most founders grind for months building something they're genuinely stoked about and then drop it into complete silence.

The audience they needed? Never built it.
The trust? Never earned it.

Here's what actually works:

The founders who are out here crushing it, whether it's SaaS, solopreneurs, or agency owners, built their audience way before they had something to sell. Why? 

Because by the time the product is ready, the people following them already trust them, vibe with them, and want to hand them money.

Adam Robinson did it and took RB2B to $8M ARR.
Felix Frank ⚙️ and Penn Frank ⚙️ are doing it for StackOptimise ⚙️ .
Matthew Putnam is doing it for Prospeo.

And how can we forget Justin Welsh - the man built an entire empire off it before most people even knew what a personal brand was! 

A personal brand gives you organic reach, builds trust with the right audience, and creates credibility that no ad spend can touch.

Your product can wait two more weeks. Your distribution can't afford to.

So what's actually stopping you from starting today?

taplio

The Battle

Christian Oland

Sachin Rawat

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreChristian Oland's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSachin Rawat's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Christian Oland

Sachin Rawat

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Christian Oland's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSachin Rawat's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreChristian Oland's LinkedIn Performance