Acquiring Inbound Leads for B2B Founders with Personal Content Programs • Explaining Content, one Ugly Drawing at a time

Content steals focus, I know. Writing, formatting, visuals, posting cadence, and keeping up with comments. It becomes a weekly tax, then it gets dropped, then inbound stays unpredictable.I build an Authority Engine for B2B Tech Founders. It turns your existing knowledge into consistent content that makes you look like the category leader, without you writing a word.What you get:1) 100% custom AI voice cloneWe extract your voice from your real materials. Whitepapers, sales calls, internal docs, Slack messages, past posts, and anything else that reflects how you think and speak. No generic templates.2) LinkedIn Autopilot5 high converting posts per week, ghostwritten, formatted, and ready to publish. You do not write, format, post, or search for visuals. You approve drafts with a simple yes or no.3) Search Dominance pack2 SEO optimized long form articles per month, derived from your LinkedIn content, so your authority compounds beyond the feed.First week of content can go live within 48 hours of onboarding. You can see engagement on day 1. Your only job is approvals.I will write 3 posts for you for free using your data, so you can see the voice match before you pay. If the first week does not sound exactly like you, or better, I rewrite it until it does, or you do not pay.Best for founders who have real insight and a real product, but do not want content creation to compete with building, selling, and hiring.If you want to test the voice clone, message me: “3 posts”.

Kuba Czubajewski

Here's a 10-min flow I use with founders to create weeks of content for them:

The goal is to create one small, high-integrity narrative object that can survive multiple contexts without losing its meaning. 

The easiest way to do that is to start with a 10-minute CEO video (use Tella or Loom), because spoken answers preserve something writing tends to bleach out: conviction, nuance, and those small qualifiers that signal real experience. 

I beg you, don’t ask for “thought leadership.” 

Ask one tight prompt that forces specificity, like what buyers are getting wrong about a problem right now, what that misunderstanding costs them, and what they should do instead.

Once you have the Loom, the extraction step matters more than the editing. 

You’re looking for a structure:

Pull out:

- one contrarian claim that creates tension
- one vivid symptom that makes the claim relatable
- one constraint that makes it believable
- one before/after framing that makes the shift obvious
- one proof detail that anchors it in reality

That proof detail can be lightweight. It can be “we heard this on 12 calls this month,” or “this showed up in every deal we lost last quarter.” 

Now you take those five ingredients and you write one “source paragraph” in plain language. Don't think of any platform yet. 

Just articulate the idea clearly as if you were explaining it to a smart friend over coffee. This paragraph becomes the anchor. Every other asset is a translation of it, not a reinvention. That’s how you keep integrity when you repurpose.

From there, I like to create three outputs that each do a different cognitive job:

First, a short text post that opens with the contrarian claim and immediately explains the symptom. 

The mistake people make is opening with the claim and then drifting into abstraction. Don’t. 

Earn the reader’s trust by describing what they already see in the wild, the call snippets, the internal debates, the marketing copy that “sounds right” but doesn’t move anything.

Second, a simple carousel where each slide is a single unit of meaning. Not “tips,” but progression. The before model, the cost of that model, the constraint that keeps people stuck, the after model, and then one practical move they can try this week. 

If you can’t fit the idea on five slides without it turning into fog, the idea isn’t ready yet.

Third, a longer form piece where you unpack the constraint and the proof detail. 

This is where nuance belongs. Why the obvious fix fails. What tradeoff you’re making. What to watch out for. 

This is also where you can safely include a real example, even if it’s anonymized, because you have space to set context.

Two quality checks before you hit publish:

• If the post could apply to any company, it’s too generic. 

• If the reader can’t repeat your point in one sentence, it’s too complicated.

If you want, reply with your niche and I’ll give you 5 tight CEO prompts that reliably produce these “weeks of content” anchors.

I’ll write 3 LinkedIn posts for free, in your voice. If it sounds like you (or better), we install your AI Authority Engine in 90 days.

I recently changed my banner to this one below and you might think I went insane:

This is not a typical path content people choose for their businesses.

“Free value” beyond a regurgitated ChatGPT lead magnet is a rare thing here.

My thinking is this:

I built an Authority System for copying B2B founders’ voice with AI.

It’s GOOD. Took me about a year to get here. 

And the easiest way to prove it is to show my potential clients how it works.

Yes, building a sample assistant is harder than posting fancy carousels and “vulnerable” fake-ass stories

But I’ve always been more of a show-don’t-tell kinda guy and not planning to stop now.

Curious how it works? Dm me “3 posts”

"comment on other creators' posts" is sh!tty advice:

I used to spend 2 hours per day here commenting on probably all of them big creators.

Most of them don't give a rat's a*s about me or my content.

And that's perfectly fine. Why would they?

Not once have I reached out to them in a DM, they have no reason to see my comment and think:

"I wonder what this guy is about?"

But the folks I exchanged DMs with are consistently showing up under my posts.

Because we established a more meaningful connection than a [put an insightful comment here so they see you're trying hard]

See what I'm getting at?

Connection > tactics.

Build the first one and you'll never need to think about the second one again.

A year ago I thought I had it figured out:

Build a content agency for B2B founders. Use AI to do the heavy lifting. Keep costs low, scale fast. Simple.

What actually happened: 

I spent months building something nobody wanted to pay for.

The first version of the system was basically:

1. take the founder's old posts
2. dump them into a prompt
3. generate something that kind of sounded like them

The output was fine. Technically competent. The kind of content that gets 15 likes and zero leads.

I wasn't impressed with myself tbh. Neither were my clients.

So I overcomplicated everything:

A 12-step onboarding process, 5 different content formats, a pricing page that looked like a software feature comparison matrix...

I was trying to cover every possible use case for every possible client, and the result was that nobody could figure out what I actually did.

The solution was so stupidly simple, I facepalmed when I finally got there:

I started interviewing founders instead of just ingesting their existing content.

Turns out the best content a founder can publish isn't what they've already written.

 It's what they say when someone asks them the right questions:

- the unguarded takes
- the specific stories
- the things they'd never think to write down but say out loud constantly

Once I built the system around that – extract the thinking first, then write – the output stopped sounding like AI trying to be human and started sounding like the founder on their best day.

That took about a year to nail.

The offer got simpler too:

Interview you -> Write it up -> Publish it -> You approve the drafts. 

That's the whole thing.

If you want to see what it looks like, DM me "3 posts" – I'll write them for free before you spend anything.

Quick tip if you hate when AI says "It's not X, it's Y..."

This rhetorical device is called "contrastive reframing using antithesis structure."

Hard-prompt it into your content assistant to avoid it (example below).

Also, from my tests, Claude 4.6 is much better at this that GPT models.

PS. Let me know any other annoying things AI uses - I'll show you how to remove them from the outputs.

How I helped a B2B consultancy business (very niche) start showing up in AI search:

We focused on turning their LinkedIn content into long-form SEO articles built around real opinions, specific frameworks, and language that maps to actual buyer problems.

AI tools cite sources that are clear and substantive. Since their LinkedIn content had this already, expanding it into articles became much easier.

The results measured over the last 90 days:

Overall: 1,619 AI bot hits → 4,163. That's 3x.
Homepage: 514 → 946. Almost 2x.

Every hit is ChatGPT or Perplexity pulling from their site while a buyer is actively researching. That's pipeline you'd never see in a cold outreach report.

If you want to see what this looks like for your niche, reply ENGINE and tell me what you sell.

200,000 people just watched a creator get stood up by a brand's AI chatbot:

Reformation used AI to manage its influencer outreach. It confirmed a collaboration, set up a store visit, and ran weeks of back-and-forth with a creator.

She drove an hour to the store, shot video in the dressing room... The manager had no idea who she was.

TikTok called it "an AI bot that went rogue." Reformation sent her a sweater as an apology.

Here's my read on what actually happened: 

AI made commitments nobody at the brand had authorized. And no human was watching the inbox it was running.

The bot did exactly what it was built to do - respond, confirm, follow up. 

But nobody told it where to stop. That's a systems failure.

AI doesn't know when it's overstepping. The tool runs until you build a stop - and plenty of AI marketing setups skip that step entirely.

There are places where automation works well: segmentation, sequences, content drafts.

And then there are contexts that require a human in the seat: real commitments, real relationships, anything a creator or partner will hold you to.

I put a lot of emphasis on that while working with my clients on their content assistants.

First draft can (and should) come from the AI. But the human editor before anything goes live is a must. 

Doesn't matter how good your AI tool is. If there's no one monitoring what it's agreeing to, you're one post away from a mess.

The CEO of impact put it well: "Human credibility becomes more valuable, not less."

That's the thing marketing teams running AI tools aren't accounting for right now, imo.

I've been inside a lot of AI content setups lately. 

Usually, it’s a single prompt, no real architecture:

A prompt produces something that sounds okay one day and off-brand the next.

What I built for myself first, now for clients, runs on 8 layers:

1. A voice profile: formality level, POV, energy, humor notes

2. A writing style guide: sentence rhythm, paragraph rules, formatting settings

3. A preferred/banned word list: the exact vocabulary the AI can and can't touch

4. Content pillars: the strategic territory the brand owns (and what it doesn't)

5. A CTA library: specific closing lines and keyword triggers, not improvised

6. An editorial guardrails file: a list of hard limits for the AI

7. A reference database: curated post examples labeled by format, hook type, and why they worked

8. A master prompt: the architecture that connects all 7 layers and tells the AI how to operate

Each layer feeds into the next. Remove one and the output starts drifting.

For example, the voice profile without the banned word list sounds right tonally but uses language the person wouldn't say out loud.

If you want to see what each layer looks like in practice, reply "SYSTEM" and I'll send you the breakdown.

🛑 STOP writing content like this:

1. Sit down to write on Sunday
2. Spend 30 mins staring at a blank page
3. Use AI with a generic prompt to help you
4. Publish weak af “thought leadership”
5. Cringe and repeat the next week

You literally sit on hundreds of content ideas from your work. Ones that will actually bring clients closer to you.

You just have to find them. If you want me to show you how, hit follow.

Scaling D2C & E-commerce Brands with Data Driven SEO & Google Ads Strategies || AEO, GEO, LLMs & Performance Driven Marketer || DM to get a CRO Audit 🔥

Struggling to get featured in LLMs, driving high-intent traffic and quality leads for Local Service &amp; E-commerce brands.I’m Asim Khan, an &amp; GEO &amp; AI Search Strategist helping service businesses stay visible in Google, AI Search, and LLM-powered answers. I combine organic and paid search strategies to drive growth based on user intent, market demand, and AI-driven strategies.Here’s what I help Local &amp; Saas brands achieve!My Core Skills✅ AI &amp; LLMs Search Optimization (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude AI, Gemini)✅&nbsp;Intent-driven Keyword &amp; Topic Mapping✅&nbsp;Structured Data &amp; Schema for AI-visibility✅&nbsp;Technical SEO &amp; Performance Optimization✅&nbsp;Paid Search Campaigns to Support Organic Growth✅ Geo Specific Landing Page Optimization for better lead generation My Recent Results! 🏆- 350% organic traffic growth → US-based EdTech → 5 months- 7K → 45K organic clicks → Global eSIM brand→ 6 months- Featured snippet &amp; SGE ranking → Pokémon collectibles storeI treat every website like my own product, data-driven, proactive, and accountable for long-term organic growth.&nbsp;DM me for a 90 Days AI SEO Roadmap for your Local &amp; SaaS Ecommerce brand! 👇

Asim Asmat

Most people open the Google Search Console and close it confused... 😌

Numbers everywhere.
→ Clicks
→ Impressions
→ Queries
→ Pages.

Yet no clear answer to one question:
Is my SEO actually moving forward? 🤔

Here’s how I use GSC to track real SEO progress, not vanity metrics!

1). Vanity Metrics
(What not to obsess over)

- Daily click jumps
- Single-day ranking changes
- Random keyword wins

They feel good.
They don’t tell a story.

2). Stability Signals (Early progress)

→ Impressions rising before clicks
→ More pages getting indexed
→ Fewer crawl or coverage issues

This is search engines testing your content.

3). Query Behavior (Intent alignment)

- New long-tail queries appearing
- Existing queries gaining impressions
- Same page ranking for multiple intents

This shows relevance is forming.

4). Page-level Momentum 
(Compounding growth)

→ Top pages getting steady clicks
→ Older content resurfacing
→ CTR improving without title changes

This is a trust building over time.

5). Directional Growth 
(The only metric that matters)

- Consistent upward trend
- Across queries, pages, and clicks
- Over weeks, not days

That’s SEO progress.

Google Search Console isn’t a reporting tool. It’s a behavior tracker.

If you read it daily, you’ll react.
If you read it weekly, you’ll see patterns.
If you read it monthly, you’ll see growth.

P.S. If you want a simple GSC review checklist to read data the right way, comment “GSC” or DM me.

Asim Khani

Helping E-commerce brands Stay Visible in Google, AI Search & LLM Answers | SEO & Search Authority Strategist

Ramadan used to slow my workflow.

❌ Late nights. 
❌ Early suhoor. 
❌ Client calls in different time zones.
❌ Energy dips were real.

But something shifted when I stopped fighting the rhythm… 

And started designing around it.
As an SEO freelancer, Ramadan became my focus season.

• Deep technical audits after Fajr
• Strategy work before distractions begin
• Light tasks + client comms later in the day
• Reflection before iftar

✅ Less noise.
✅ More clarity.
✅ Better decisions.

Ramadan doesn’t reduce output.
It forces intention.

And in SEO, intention beats intensity.

Consistency isn’t about working more hours. It’s about protecting the right ones.

To every freelancer balancing faith and deadlines this month, may your work carry barakah.

P.S. How are you structuring your work differently this Ramadan?

taplio

The Battle

Kuba Czubajewski

Asim Asmat

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreKuba Czubajewski's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAsim Asmat's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Kuba Czubajewski

Asim Asmat

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Kuba Czubajewski's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAsim Asmat's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreKuba Czubajewski's LinkedIn Performance