Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt

//CEO@GRANNY&SMITH, DE-RISKING INNOLAB FOR THE MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES

I’m an inventor, innovator and investor. I turn real problems into real companies.My career changed the moment I realized most innovations fail for the same reason: everyone talks about ideas - almost no one builds them.In boardrooms and workshops, I watched brilliant concepts suffocate under politics, process and PowerPoints. The spark in people’s eyes faded the moment reality entered the room. I couldn’t unsee it.So I stopped helping people discuss the future and started building it.Over the past 15 years, I’ve created products, ventures and business models that didn’t exist before. What began as engineering evolved into a practice: recognizing real unmet needs, inventing the solution and forming a company around it.Today, I operate where invention, innovation and investment meet. I don’t manage portfolios — I create the companies they’re built from.How I work: • real-world problems • physical + digital products • validated demand • scalable models • long-term ownershipWhat drives me: If you can see a better future, you’re responsible for building it. I work with people who believe progress comes from creating, not talking — and who want to bring things into the world that should already exist.That’s why I build.More: grannyandsmith.com

We are here to help you develop, test, and grow new business ideas in a few weeks instead of months. We specialize in innovation development, constantly keeping up with the latest trends, methods, and ways of working.

We have been developing innovation for our customers for more than 15 years now. Our teams, consisting of designers, engineers, software developers, and business model experts, have tried a lot and gained much experience. Today we know what works and what does not - so you don't have to make all those experiences again.

Our INNOWEEK® method is the result of more than 15 years of continuous development and project experience with well-known DAX groups and Fortune 500 companies and helps you to develop, test, and grow new business ideas in a few weeks instead of months.

STEVE JOBS: HOW MANY OF YOU ARE CONSULTANTS? OH... THAT'S BAD!

Consulting is broken.

A lot of smart people…
 _Sell you a PowerPoint.
 _Disappear when it’s time to execute.

_No skin in the game.
_No responsibility.
_No results.

Consulting can feel like hiring someone to build you a sandcastle…
 …and finding out they only brought a whiteboard.

Big ideas. Fancy slides.

And when it’s time to actually do the thing — poof — they’re gone.

We prefer a different game: roll up sleeves, build stuff that works, and maybe get some sand in our shoes.

Because in innovation, the fun part is not talking about the castle.
 
It’s standing in front of it saying: 

“Yep. We made that.”

———

The strategy 7 of Germany's most innovative companies already follow
https://lnkd.in/dexsVrw8

#innovation #innoweek #venturestudio #companybuilder #startupstudio #vc 

All rights and credits are reserved for the respective owner(s). 
Contact me to be added as a reference or to request content removal.

♻️ Share this with someone building the next big thing. 
Follow Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt for innovation strategies that actually work.

Dipl Ing Lars Behrendt 

INVENTOR · INNOVATOR · INVESTOR - Building Companies. Not Slide Decks. We build and scale industrial ventures. At own risk.

STEVE JOBS SAID ONE DECISION IN LIFE SEPARATES SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE FROM THOSE WHO ONLY DREAM

That decision? 

PERSEVERANCE.

Steve Jobs put it perfectly:

"I'm convinced that about half of what separates the successful entrepreneurs from the non-successful ones is pure perseverance.... Unless you have a lot of passion about this, you're not going to survive. You're going to give it up."

Jobs knew this from experience. He was fired from Apple, started over with NeXT, then came back to build one of the world's most valuable companies.
Here's what separates dreamers from achievers:

_Passion fuels persistence - Without deep passion for your mission, you'll quit when things get tough

_Setbacks become feedback - Every failure reveals what customers really want and where you need to improve

_Long-term vision beats short-term pain - When you're anchored in your "why," you can weather any storm

_Persist, but pivot - Stay committed to the goal while being flexible in your approach

Research backs this up: Angela Duckworth's studies show that grit and sustained perseverance predict success better than IQ or talent alone.

The next time you want to quit, ask yourself: Am I facing a dead end—or just the natural friction of progress?

The leaders who refuse to quit, who show up one more time after setbacks, are the ones who ultimately cross the finish line.

What's one time perseverance made all the difference in your journey? 

———

The strategy 7 of Germany's most innovative companies already follow
https://lnkd.in/dexsVrw8

#innovation #innoweek #venturestudio #companybuilder #startupstudio #vc 

All rights and credits are reserved for the respective owner(s). 
Contact me to be added as a reference or to request content removal.

♻️ Share this with someone building the next big thing. 
Follow Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt for innovation strategies that actually work.

Powering Gemba Walks with Artificial Intelligence | Follow for posts on Continuous Improvement and Innovation

Hi - I'm Ivan, an industrial engineer with 7+ years of experience in Operations Management and Kaizen.

I serve two main groups of people:

1. Executives tired of broken processes burning money - I show them how to fix it and recapture 15-30% in Muda

2. Founders in Continuous Improvement who know their stuff but can't crack LinkedIn - I show them how to turn it into a legit revenue channel

(send me a direct message for more info)

I started writing on LinkedIn in October 2023. Since then, I have been sharing actionable, educational, and entertaining content to support LinkedIn community members in their Kaizen journey. It helped me grow my audience from 9,000 to 100,000 followers in 2024.

I have been posting around:

	• Continuous Improvement
	• Lean Manufacturing
	• Growth Mindset
	• Innovation

Including insights on 5S, Value Stream Mapping, Leadership, Industry 4.0, and Problem Solving. 

Now I'm building Gemba Walk AI to make every Gemba Walk part of a learning system, where collective insights drive faster, better decisions than any single expert could achieve.

For free weekly tips, subscribe to The Kaizen Geek newsletter.

Ivan Carillo

Toyota's competitors thought Taiichi Ohno was insane. He was letting line workers stop production over a scratched fender. They stopped laughing when Toyota dominated the industry for the next 50 years. Here's what happened:

After World War II, Ohno visited auto factories in Detroit. He expected to learn from the best. Instead, he found rework areas filled with broken pieces and leftover parts. Waste everywhere, hiding in plain sight.

He went back to Toyota City and did something nobody had tried before. At every station on the assembly line, he hung a rope called the Andon cord.

The instruction was simple: 

If you see a defect pull the cord. The line slows or stops. Engineers, workers, and suppliers huddle up and fix it on the spot. Detroit thought he was crazy. "How can you build thousands of cars a day if you stop the line for every little scratch?"

Ohno's answer was simple: 

A scratched fender is an early warning that a piece of equipment is failing. Fix the scratch today, and you prevent 500 defective fenders next week. Ignore it, and you're building rework areas just like Detroit.

That's the difference between firefighting and fire prevention.

Most operations leaders I talk to are stuck in firefighting mode. They walk past small defects every day because the line has to keep moving.

But those small defects are talking to you. They're telling you exactly where your next big quality failure will come from.

How many "minor" defects is your team walking past today that are actually early warning signs?

Kaizen vs. Innovation
 
Who wins?
 
There are two types of improvement:
 
Kaizen → Continuous improvements through ongoing effort. Involves everyone. Requires little money but sustained work.
 
Innovation → Dramatic improvements from large investments in new technology. Involves select champions. Requires big money but less sustained effort.
 
You need both. But here's how to proceed if you are forced to choose between the two.
 
 Choose Innovation when:
 
-you need dramatic breakthroughs to compete
-technology has fundamentally changed
-current processes are broken beyond repair
-you're entering new markets
-you must leapfrog competitors
 
Choose Kaizen when:
 
-you need sustainable competitive advantage
-you want to build organizational capability
-current processes work but need improvement
-you want everyone engaged in improvement
-you need to protect gains from innovation
 
Innovation creates the breakthrough.
Kaizen sustains it.
 
Without continuous improvement, every innovation you invest in will slowly erode back to zero.

A split illustration comparing Kaizen and Innovation. On the left, a hand-drawn sketch of a SIM card tray with a notched SIM card — labeled "Poka Yoke" — representing Kaizen's approach of error-proofing and incremental improvement. On the right, four SIM card generations shown in descending size order: Full Size, Mini SIM, Nano SIM, and eSIM — representing Innovation's leaps to entirely new solutions. Below both panels, the caption reads: "Kaizen gets you better, Innovation gets you different. You need both to thrive."

Taiichi Ohno said: "Where there is no standard, there can be no Kaizen."
 
He could have kept going:
 
 
Where there is no Kaizen, there can be no Innovation.
 
Standards don't kill creativity.
They create the foundation that makes creativity possible.

A pencil-drawn diagram of a steep incline with a ball marked "P" (representing a Process) at four progressive positions moving uphill. Each upward leap is labeled "kaizen" with a curved arrow. Between each position, a wedge or chock block under the ball — labeled "Standardization!" — prevents it from sliding back down. At the bottom left, a ball with no wedge shows the process rolling backward, labeled "process," illustrating regression without standardization. Below the illustration, the caption reads: "Where there is no standard, there can be no Kaizen."

Most problem-solvers fix the symptom. The best ones find the trap.
Employees with strong problem-solving skills:
 
 
→ Earn 18% more than those without
→ Report 31% lower stress at work
→ Get rated 42% more effective by their teams
 
Here are 5 thinking traps that sabotage even smart problem-solvers:
 
1/ The Cobra Effect
 
During British colonial rule, Delhi had a cobra problem. The government offered a bounty for every dead cobra.
 
Residents bred cobras to collect the cash. When the program ended, they released the snakes.
 
Delhi ended up with more cobras than before.
 
The lesson: incentives shape behavior. Design them wrong, and you make the problem worse.
 
2/ The Iceberg of Ignorance
 
Frontline workers see 100% of the problems. Senior leaders see roughly 4%.
 
The disconnect kills good decisions, because the people making calls don't have the full picture. And the people with the full picture don't get heard.
 
3/ The River of Waste
 
Solving a problem in one place often pushes it somewhere else.
 
Before you act, identify the 3–4 biggest rocks in the river. Tackle them one at a time. Otherwise you're just moving water.
 
4/ The Ostrich Effect
 
We avoid bad news because it's uncomfortable. So we ignore warning signs, delay hard conversations, and convince ourselves things are fine.
 
The problem doesn't disappear. It grows.
 
5/ Frequency Illusion
 
Once you notice something, you see it everywhere. And start connecting dots that don't exist.
 
This bias distorts your diagnosis. You find the problem you're looking for, not the one that's actually there.
 
TLTR: Avoid the traps that blind you.
 
***
PS. Manufacturing teams struggle to capture critical floor insights. 

That's why we are building gembawalk.ai. 

Gemba Walk AI digitalizes your observation process, so you can ensure your CI efforts deliver measurable results. 

Join the waitlist now: gembawalk.ai

We are launching in April for a limited time before we waitlist again.

Infographic by GembaWalk.ai titled "The Dark Side of Problem-Solving." Five illustrated panels cover: the Cobra Effect (unintended consequences of incentives), the Iceberg of Ignorance (only 4% of problems reach top management), the River of Waste (solving visible symptoms without tackling root causes), the Ostrich Effect (avoiding negative information), and Frequency Illusion (over-noticing recently learned concepts). Framed by quotes from Ben Aaronovitch and H.L. Mencken.

"We don't have time for improvement."
This is the biggest lie in business.
You have time for:
 
-fixing the same problems every week
-working around broken processes
-apologizing to angry customers
-replacing burned-out employees
-losing market share to competitors
 
But not 30 mins a day to move forward?
 
Organizations that say they can't afford Kaizen are already spending a third of their time on the consequences of not improving.
 
They're paying the price. Just not getting the benefits.
 
Real Kaizen can fit inside the workday you already have:
 
→ 3-minute fixes at the point of work
→ 15-minute daily stand-ups
→ 1-hour weekly problem-solving sessions
→ Half-day monthly deep dives
 
Inaction is the real time waster.

Leadership says they want continuous improvement. But their calendars say otherwise (read this ↓)
 
The calendars of most leaders tell a rather sad story:
 
-no time at the Gemba
-no presence in problem-solving
-no show at daily standups
-always firefighting
 
They delegate improvement to others, then review the results they didn't help create.
 
And they wonder why Kaizen culture doesn't stick.
 
Culture isn't shaped by what leaders say.
It's shaped by what they do.
 
Your people already know the answers:
 
→ Does this leader surface problems or bury them?
→ Stick with priorities or shift every week?
→ Model standard work or skip it?
→ Treat mistakes as learning or as blame?
→ Show respect for the people doing the work?
 
Remember:
 
You can't delegate culture.

***
PS. Operations leaders struggle to capture critical floor insights. 

That's why we are building gembawalk.ai. 

Gemba Walk AI digitalizes your observation process, so you can ensure your CI efforts deliver measurable results. 

Join the waitlist now: gembawalk.ai

We are launching in April for a limited time before we waitlist again.

A diagram titled "Kaizen Organization" showing how focus is distributed across four organizational levels — Top Management, Middle Management, Supervisors, and Front-line Associates — along a horizontal "Focus" axis.
The diagram is divided into three zones by two diagonal lines running from the bottom-left to the upper-right corner. Innovation occupies the upper-left triangle and belongs primarily to Top Management. Kaizen spans the wide middle band and is shared across all levels, with the largest portion allocated to Middle Management and Supervisors. Maintenance fills the lower-right triangle and is the primary focus of Front-line Associates.
The key insight is that Kaizen is not a leadership-only activity — it cuts across every layer of the hierarchy, with every level contributing to continuous improvement while also owning their respective primary responsibilities.

Most companies are stuck on one speed. That's why they never reach Operational Excellence. The Japanese solved this decades ago with 3 concepts most leaders still confuse:
 
Kaizen - Kaikaku - Kakushin
 
Most leaders treat them as buzzwords. A few use one of them well. Very few uses all three in the right way, at the right time.
 
Here's what they mean (and why you need all three):
 
1/ Kaizen → Change for the better
 
Small, continuous improvements. Every day. Everyone involved.
 
→ Low cost, low risk
→ Driven by frontline workers and managers alike
→ Builds lasting habits, not one-time fixes
 
Example: Adjusting a workstation layout to cut motion by 10%.
 
Kaizen doesn't create breakthroughs.
It sustains them, and compounds gains over time.
 
2/ Kaikaku → Radical change
 
A deliberate, large-scale transformation of a process or system.
 
→ Top-down decision driven by urgency or opportunity
→ Higher investment and risk
→ Rewires how an entire system operates
 
Example: Redesigning your entire production flow to implement pull-based manufacturing.
 
Kaikaku creates a new baseline.
Kaizen then locks it in.
 
3/ Kakushin → Innovation
 
Reinvention. Creating something that didn't exist before.
 
→ Highest risk, highest potential reward
→ Disrupts markets or creates entirely new ones
→ Requires courage to abandon what's working
 
Example: Building an AI-powered process that makes the old one obsolete.
 
Kakushin opens new territory.
The other two make sure you can hold it.

Hand-drawn graph on aged paper showing three levels of process improvement over time: Kaizen as small incremental steps, Kaikaku as a steeper staircase of radical change, and Kakushin as an exponential curve representing innovation and reinvention.

Accountability and blame cannot coexist.
 
Pick one.
 
The most common tendency in traditional management?
 
Falling into the blame trap.
 
Blame Culture
 
→ Problems hide
→ Mistakes get covered up
→ People protect themselves
→ Learning stops
→ Improvement dies
 
Accountability Culture
 
→ Problems surface quickly
→ Mistakes become lessons
→ People own their commitments
→ Learning accelerates
→ Improvement thrives

Blame asks: "Who caused this?"
Accountability asks: "What caused this?"

All the difference in one word.

Hand-written text on a beige paper background reading "Blame the people" with "the people" crossed out in red, replaced below with "the process" written in red — transforming the phrase into "Blame the process."

Master Continuous Improvement to keep your business ahead in 2026. 

(check this out ↓)

1/ PDCA

PDCA is the backbone of Lean problem-solving.

Four steps. Methodical. Repeatable.

Use it for:

+Problem solving
+Quality management
+New product development
+Process improvement

It stops you from jumping to solutions before you understand the problem.

2/ Value Stream Mapping

VSM shows every step in your operation from raw material to customer delivery. It exposes waste hiding in plain sight.

Five steps to build one:

+Pick a product family
+Assemble the VSM team
+Calculate customer demand
+Map the material flow
+Map the information flow

3/ Kanban

Toyota invented Kanban in the 1950s to control production flow.

Today it manages work across manufacturing, logistics, and software.

A Kanban board has three elements: columns, cards, and swimlanes. 

Move work faster, cut waste, and see bottlenecks before they cost you.

4/ 5S

5S turns a chaotic workspace into a clean, standardized one.
Five steps, all starting with S:
Sort (Seiri) — Remove what you don't need
Set In Order (Seiton) — A place for everything
Shine (Seiso) — Clean and inspect daily
Standardize (Seiketsu) — Lock in the new normal
Sustain (Shitsuke) — Make it a habit

5/ Poka Yoke

Poka-Yoke means "mistake-proofing" in Japanese.

It builds error prevention directly into the process, so operators can't make the wrong move even if they try.

6/ Gemba Walk

Data tells you what happened. Gemba shows you why.

"Gemba" means "actual place" in Japanese.

Leave your desk. Walk the floor. See the work firsthand.

***
Manufacturing teams struggle to capture critical floor insights. 

That's why we are building gembawalk.ai. 

Gemba Walk AI digitalizes your observation process, so you can ensure your CI efforts deliver measurable results. 

Join the waitlist now: gembawalk.ai 

(and get also our checklists for free)

Fast, Cheap, Good - Pick two.
 
(trade-offs are inevitable)
 
"We need it fast, under budget, and perfect."
 
Everyone knows it's impossible. Nobody says it.
 
Three months later:
 
The project is late, over budget, or broken.
 
 You can't have everything.
 
The worst project managers?
 
They promise all three.
Then they blame the team when it doesn't work.
 
PS. Do you think the project management triangle is still relevant?

Before you launch your next improvement initiative, ask yourself one question:
 
Have I stabilized the current process first?
 
Improvement efforts layered on top of unstable processes produce unstable results.
 
The gains look real for a few time, then quietly disappear.
 
Standardize. Document. Train. Hold the standard.
 
Then improve.

Hand-drawn diagram showing three targets representing process states. Top-left: an 'Unstable Process' target with dots scattered across all rings. A solid arrow labeled 'What most teams try' points directly to the top-right 'Stabilized Process' target, where dots are clustered near the center but still spread out. A dashed arrow with an X crosses out this direct path. Instead, a second path goes downward to a 'Stabilized + Improved' target at the bottom, where all dots are tightly grouped in the bullseye, then curves up to the Stabilized Process — labeled 'What actually works.' The message: don't try to improve an unstable process directly — first stabilize it, then improve.

Stop calling them solutions. They are countermeasures. Here's why it changes how you think: (not a wordplay at all)
 
 
"Solution" means the problem is solved.
 
Done.
Move on.
Forget about it.
 
"Countermeasure" means you countered today's conditions.
 
Tomorrow brings new ones.
Stay sharp.
 
Watch what happens when teams use each word:
 
SOLUTION MINDSET
 
→ Fix it once
→ Walk away
→ Blame someone when it breaks again
→ Resist going back to look
 
COUNTERMEASURE MINDSET
 
→ Counter what you see now
→ Watch how it holds
→ Expect things to shift
→ Plan your next adjustment
 
One word builds complacency. The other builds discipline.

A pencil sketch-style portrait of Taiichi Ohno, the father of the Toyota Production System, depicted as a middle-aged Japanese man in a collared shirt and tie, with a factory floor illustrated in the background. Beside his portrait is a quote that reads: "Something is wrong if workers do not look around each day, find things that are tedious or boring, and then rewrite the procedures. Even last month's manual should be out of date." — Taiichi Ohno.

Let's be honest. Your endless meetings are a waste of time. Here's how Kaizen organizations turn 10 minutes into millions of dollars in savings:
 
Traditional meetings:
 
→ 30-60 minutes of opinions
→ Problems hidden in PowerPoints
→ Action items that die in email
→ Same issues next week
 
Daily huddles:
 
→ 10 minutes standing up
→ Problems visible on boards
→ Ownership assigned immediately
→ Issues escalate or resolve in 24 hours
 
We implemented this at a 300-person manufacturing facility.
 
Week 1: "We don't have time for daily meetings"
Week 4: "How did we survive without this?"
 
Here's the structure that made a difference:
 
Tier 1 → Frontline - Daily
 
+What broke?
+Who needs help?
+What's blocking us?
 
Tier 2 → Supervisors - Daily
 
+What can't frontline solve?
+Where do we need support?
 
Tier 3 → Managers - 2x week
 
+What patterns are emerging?
+What resources needed?
 
Tier 4 → Leaders - Weekly
 
+What strategic issues surfaced?
+What investments required?
 
Results after 90 days:
 
Problems solved → 73% faster
Employee engagement → +34%
Productivity → +22%
 
P.S. Your teams don't need longer meetings.
 
They need better systems.

A pencil sketch illustration of five businessmen in suits sitting around a conference table, reacting in shock and alarm as a dark, tentacled monster emerges from a swirling vortex at the center of the table. Money bills float through the air. Financial charts and graphs — showing upward trends, bar charts, and pie charts — cover the whiteboards on the surrounding walls. The creature has multiple eyes and dripping tentacles, cracking through the table's surface, symbolizing a hidden threat consuming organizational resources or time during a business meeting.

Management has 2 functions: maintenance and improvement. The higher you go in management, the more time you spend on improvement. (read this ↓)
 
There are two types of improvement:
 
Kaizen → Continuous improvements through ongoing effort. Involves everyone. Requires little money but sustained work.
 
Innovation → Dramatic improvements from large investments in new technology. Involves select champions. Requires big money but less sustained effort.
 
But there's one thing most managers misunderstand:
 
Kaizen creates something innovation alone cannot, 
i.e. lasting change that compounds over time.
 
Innovation alone:
 
- Big improvement spike
- Gradual decline as gains erode
- New problems emerge
- Process isn't maintained
- Another innovation creates another spike
- Another decline follows
 
Kaizen plus innovation:
 
- Innovation creates the breakthrough
- Kaizen sustains and enhances the gains
- Next innovation starts from a higher baseline
- Creates a staircase pattern upward
- Competitors can't catch up
 
You need both.
 
Innovation creates the breakthrough.
Kaizen sustains it.
 
Without CI, every innovation you invest in will slowly erode back to zero.

The operator put all his setup tools on a cart instead of walking back and forth. 

Setup time down 15%. 

No engineers. No capital. No approval process.

That's Kaizen.

A pencil-sketch illustration of a maintenance worker in work clothes and a beanie hat standing in an industrial workshop. To his left, a rolling tool cart sits in front of a pegboard wall displaying organized hand tools including wrenches, screwdrivers, pliers, and gauges. A toolbox rests on the floor beside the cart. To his right, a large metal lathe machine occupies the background. The setting evokes a factory floor with exposed brick walls and overhead pipes.

Traditional management follows Plan-Do-Check-Finish. After checking results, they stop. Here is why their improvements don't last:
 
Companies preach the use of PDCA, but they are used to skip the Act phase.
 
No standardization. No next cycle. Improvement quietly dies.
 
Sound familiar?
 
1/ Team builds a detailed improvement plan
2/ Implementation starts with real enthusiasm 
3/ Results get measured once, maybe twice
4/ The new process gets abandoned when the next crisis hits
 
Real PDCA never stops spinning:
 
Plan → Set the target and action steps
Do → Run the pilot on a small scale first
Check → Measure results against expectations
Act → Standardize what works, kill what doesn't
 
In a Kaizen culture, every completed cycle starts the next one.
 
That's how small gains compound into advantages your competitors can't copy.

A site operations lead fixed a morale crisis in 45 days. His total investment: 3 minutes per day. Zero dollars. Here's the story:
 
 
A manufacturing plant had a turnover problem nobody could explain. The plant manager brought in an HR consultant to interview employees at every level.
 
The complaints weren't what he expected.
 
→ "When I walk past the site lead, he doesn't look me in the eye."
→ "I've never seen him smile."
→ "I sacrificed time with my children for that task. Not a single thank you."
→ "I was presenting to leadership. Every one of them was texting."
 
No one asked for more money.
 
They wanted to be seen. They wanted to know their work mattered.
 
The fix took no budget, no program rollout.
 
 The plant manager committed to 3 minutes a day:
 
→ Greeting people by name on the floor
→ Asking one person about their weekend
→ Saying "thank you" when someone delivered work
→ Putting his phone away in meetings
 
3 minutes of respect and consideration each day.
 
That's it.
 
45 days later, morale scores had jumped. Attrition slowed. The floor felt different.
 
People don't leave bad companies. They leave leaders who make them feel invisible.
 
PS. When was the last time you walked the floor and thanked someone by name?

The biggest lie in manufacturing improvement:
 
"Kaizen only works in Japan."
 
Companies in the US, Europe, and beyond have proven the opposite for decades.
 
Culture affects how you implement Kaizen, not whether it works.
 
The principles are universal because they're just good management:
 
+observe the process 
+involve the people closest to the work
+make small improvements every day
 
…and never stop.
 
That's Kaizen.

***
Manufacturing teams struggle to capture critical floor insights. 

That's why we are building gembawalk.ai. 

Gemba Walk AI digitalizes your observation process, so you can ensure your CI efforts deliver measurable results. 

Join the waitlist now: gembawalk.ai

We are launching in April for a limited time before we waitlist again.

A minimalist Japanese-style illustration featuring a large red circle (evoking the rising sun) against a cream, textured background. In the foreground, black silhouettes depict a traditional arched bridge with a figure standing on it, a pagoda-style structure with a person nearby, and a windswept bonsai tree to the right. Two cranes fly across the upper portion of the red circle. The overall aesthetic evokes vintage Japanese poster art.

Do you know what the clearest expression of leadership contradiction is? Executives who say they want a Continuous Improvement culture, but then punish people who report problems. (read this ↓) 
 
Some executives say they want to build a Kaizen culture.
Then they punish people for surfacing problems.
 
Let me be clear about this:
 
You can't build a Kaizen culture in the dark.
 
Kaizen organizations understand that
problems aren't threats. They're treasures.
 
You should strive for true transparency.
 
It means:
 
→ Making problems intentionally visible
→ Celebrating when problems are surfaced
→ Creating systems where hiding issues is harder than solving them
 
Remember:
 
Secrecy is the enemy of excellence.
 
P.S. How visible are problems in your organization?
 
Can people surface issues without fear?

Hand-drawn sketch of an iceberg. The visible tip above water is labeled "What executives see." The massive submerged portion is filled with operational problems: waste, delays, defects, conflict, rework, inefficiency, miscommunication, technical debt, bottlenecks, poor planning, manual work, overproduction, inventory, transportation, motion, waiting, non-value-add, quality issues, misalignment, burnout, bugs, broken processes, silos, lack of transparency, poor alignment, cultural friction, bureaucracy, duplication of effort, hidden costs, missed deadlines, and systemic flaws.

Your executives make million-dollar decisions about processes they haven't seen in months. Then they wonder why their "brilliant ideas" fail. Would you walk 20 metres to find the answers you've been looking for?
 
Well, most leaders don't go to the Gemba often enough.
Others go, but they aren't fully present.
 
And that's why their processes suck.
 
Gemba means "the actual place" in Japanese. It's where..
 
+value is created
+problems actually happen
+solutions are born
 
Value isn't in meetings about meetings.
 
Your next step?
 
1/ Put on safety shoes
2/ Leave your office
3/ Go where the real work happens
 
Ask three questions:
 
+What problems do you see?
+What would make your job easier?
+What would you change if you could?
 
Then listen. Really listen.
 
The Gemba never lies.
Your data might.
 
P.S. When was the last time you spent an hour where value is created?
 
***
My first SaaS, gembawalk.ai, aims to make every gemba walk part of a learning system, where collective insights drive faster, better decisions than any single expert could achieve.

Launching in April. 
 
Waitlist gets first access + exclusive pricing.
 
👉 Join the waitlist: gembawalk.ai

taplio

The Battle

Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt

Ivan Carillo

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreDipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreIvan Carillo's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt

Ivan Carillo

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Dipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreIvan Carillo's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreDipl.-Ing. Lars Behrendt's LinkedIn Performance