Leadership Community Builder | Executive, Leadership, Career Coach | Executive and Leadership Development | Get Unstuck and Be the Leader of Your Career and Self | The Executive and The LFY Revolution Podcasts

High‑achieving leaders don’t hire a coach to fix what’s broken; they hire a coach because they refuse to stay on autopilot and are ready to lead at a higher level in their work, career, and life.

You have the accomplishments, the title, the experience. But you know you’re capable of more:

•greater clarity in how you think and decide when the stakes are real
•stronger confidence in who you are and how you lead, not just what you do
•more control over your time, energy, and direction, not just your calendar
•greater consistency, presence, and stability when everything depends on you
•leadership that starts from the inside, not external pressure or expectation

You’re not looking for generic leadership or career development. You want to become the most important leader in your own life, lead yourself with clarity, confidence, and control, and build a career and life aligned with your values, without fear of judgment or performance.

I work with CEOs, founders, and senior leaders who carry real responsibility — people, money, legacy, consequence. They’re capable, respected, and externally successful, but internally isolated. They make high‑stakes decisions alone, carry emotional and cognitive load without a place to put it, and over time, their self‑trust erodes.

My coaching helps them:

• think clearly under pressure, not just “get clarity” once
• rebuild trust in their own judgment, so they can decide and act from themselves
• define their personal leadership brand and vision, so they can lead with urgency and calm
• carry responsibility without carrying everything alone
• lead from self‑trust, not just performance

My coaching blends:

• executive leadership development for high‑stakes roles
• career strategy and direction at every stage
• identity and behavior change for leaders who carry real responsibility
• self‑leadership psychology (the 3 Cs: Clarity, Confidence, Control)
• strategic decision‑making in complex, ambiguous environments

This is deep work delivered in a grounded, practical, leadership‑ready way. It’s not motivational or abstract. It’s the leadership and career work most leaders avoid, and the work that compounds over time.

Leaders partner with me when they’re ready to:

• lead themselves with more intention and discipline, not just competence
• align their leadership with their values, not just performance
•make clearer, faster decisions they trust, even when the data is incomplete
 
If you’re ready to lead in alignment with who you are — without fear of judgment — and build a career and life that are truly your own, let’s connect.

Dr. Benjamin Ritter

Unstick Your Growth Engine in 4 Weeks to Multiply your Revenue | Rare Disease Advocate | Dad of 4 under 10

Most B2B SaaS companies at $2M-$8M ARR have the same problem:
Your marketing team rebuilds everything from scratch. Email campaigns take weeks. AI experiments go nowhere. Automation breaks. Nobody has time to create reusable systems.

You're working harder, but execution speed stays flat.

Here's what I do:
I'm a strategic advisor who designs marketing systems architecture for B2B SaaS companies. I work with 8 companies maximum at a time.

My job: Design the funnels, AI workflows, and automation blueprints your team needs to execute 2-3x faster.

Your team's job: Build and implement from my designs.

I work at the architecture and strategy level—I design the system and show you exactly how to build it. 
You do the building.
I work with:

B2B SaaS companies doing $2M-$8M ARR
CEOs and marketing leaders who value systems over tactics
Teams with execution capacity (5-10 hours/week minimum)
Companies tired of one-off campaigns and random AI experiments

20+ years in B2B SaaS and agencies: Product leadership, platform engineering, marketing automation, and go-to-market

What makes me different?

Most advisors understand marketing OR engineering OR AI. Rarely all three.
I design marketing systems that:

Actually convert (decades of marketing expertise)
Can actually be built (platform engineering background)
Use data effectively (data company leadership)
Leverage AI properly (real ML experience, not trend-hopping)

Your systems ship faster because I understand marketing strategy, technical feasibility, data architecture, and AI implementation.

Current clients see:

Marketing execution 2-3x faster within 90 days
70%+ team adoption of new systems (vs. 20-30% industry average)
Leadership spending 40-60% more time on strategy
Frameworks still being used 12+ months later

If you're an Agency or B2B SaaS company at $2M-$8M ARR looking to build marketing systems that scale, let's talk.
📧 Email me: matt@matthewkantor.com or visit the website.

Matthew Kantor

Just hired a “scale expert”?

Congrats.

You're about to learn that “scale” means:

* Sending 100k emails with Clay
* Closing a “high-ticket” DM deal
* Or raking in 30 leads a month (wow!)

In other words: little to nothing.

The truth?

Most of these gurus have never scaled anything... unless we’re counting *their ego*.

Real scale looks boring:

* Systems that don’t break.
* Teams that don’t burn out.
* Customers who stay *and* refer.

It’s not sexy.
It’s just serious leadership, consistent execution and thoughtfully designed systems. 

You don’t scale by growing faster.
You scale by growing without chaos.

So unless your coach can explain that...
You didn’t hire a scale expert.

You hired a cheese grater.

So here’s the question:

What’s the dumbest “scaling advice” you’ve ever heard?

Trusted Advisor + coach for B2B SaaS founders who’ve plateaued and are ready to grow past $3M ARR.

No alternative text description for this image

Replacing your team with AI?

You just hired a thousand interns with no manager.

Too many execs automate for cost. 

Not strategy. They cut humans.

They forgot one thing:  humans ARE the strategy.

Here's what they're missing:

Everyone will have the same AI soon. Your only edge? Your people.

The spreadsheet was revolutionary 30 years ago. Today it's a calculator. AI will follow the same path.

Smart leaders aren't cutting. They're training teams on the tools. Moving 2x faster without losing anyone.

Even Ben Affleck can see it.  Why can't you?

AI isn't a replacement. It's a multiplier.

Train your people. Equip them to win.

Because when the dust settles, only leaders who invested in their teams will still be leading.

The rest of them will spend a year explaining why they lost. 

What's your decision?

Most founders don’t fail because they aim too high.

They fail because they aim at “reasonable.”

Your brain is built to avoid risk, rejection, and embarrassment.

So you tell yourself:
“I don’t have the network to grow.”
“I didn’t go to Stanford.”
“They had backers I don't.”

That story keeps you safe.

And it keeps you small.

Thinking big isn’t a personality trait.

It’s a choice. 

It's a muscle - you have to work it or you forget.

But that aside - remember this...

Massive growth doesn’t always require massively more effort.

Carrying 1 bag of groceries up the stairs versus 10 bags...

It’s the same number of steps.

Same distance.

Just different muscles.

So pick a bigger number of steps to climb.

Not to feed your ego.

To serve more people.

What’s the “too big” goal you're thinking about ? Everybody has one.

The best marketers I know don’t have jobs.

They have clients.

When I filled in as a recruiter, I saw behind the curtain:
• 400+ resumes per role
• Bots and bad fits everywhere
• Great people buried at the bottom
  
But the ones getting hired? They weren’t applying. 

hey were being referred.

That’s when I realized:

If you’re skilled enough to get hired, you’re skilled enough to consult.

Same motion. Just pointed in a different direction.

And one of those paths has no income cap.

Most of the best clients have been through referrals. 

Stop chasing job boards. 

Start building demand.

Decide out what you are worth and how you want to spend your time.

The upside is massive.

Agree?

She spent hours with ChatGPT to rewrite the same email on repeat.

No conversions.

The email wasn't the problem. The positioning was broken from line one.

No amount of AI polish fixes a misaligned offer.

What little you time you have left is being wasted by the prompt. 

Here's what every founder tells me:

"We tried AI for marketing. It didn't help."

Of course it failed.

You automated a strategy that didn't work at manual speed. Now it fails faster.

Automating bad ideas is like serving chicken sushi.

Technically possible. Totally insane.

The real question isn't "How do we use AI better?"

It's: "What's actually broken in our positioning that more content won't fix?"

I've seen this many times now. Companies spend $40K on AI tools before spending 4 hours on strategic alignment.

6 months later: More content. Same revenue.

If you're scaling from $2M-$10M and your marketing feels less effective as you spend more

Book a 30-minute diagnostic call where we'll identify what's actually broken.

Link the comments

Everyone thinks they need more strategy.

But strategy without structure is just a guessing game.

You wouldn’t vacation by getting in a car, hit the gas, and figuring out where you’re going later.

Yet that’s how most teams operate:

Strategy is set.
Goals are clear.
But decisions are made on gut, habit, questionable data or politics.

The result? Complexity rises. Coherence drops. And growth stalls.

What they’re missing isn’t vision.

It’s Decision Architecture.

A system that makes good decisions repeatable. 

Especially under pressure.

Before you execute strategy, ask:

“Can we consistently choose the right next move?”

If not, fix that first.

Jeff Bezos was once told he had enough ideas to kill Amazon.

Too many ideas isn’t a strength.

It’s a silent killer.

Teams get overwhelmed.

Execution slows down.

And nothing truly gets done.

I’ve seen it first-hand.

Founders stuck in idea-mode, while the business bleeds.

That’s why I help build roadmaps with ruthless clarity.

Fewer options. Better focus.

Because fewer options = more progress = less risk = more revenue

Give your best ideas a real shot.

Start by saying no to the rest.

How many "great ideas" do you have?

A Founder I know spent 18 months perfecting their app.  Zero customer conversations during that time.

Brilliant product. 

One competitor with a lame product has hundreds of customers.

Same market. Same opportunity window.

I see this pattern every month now.

Founder obsesses over:
• Dashboard pixel alignment
• Email template A/B tests 
• Internal process documentation
• "Strategic" deck refinements

Meanwhile, their calendar shows 3 customer calls in 8 weeks.

This is a major problem. 

They treat busy work like real work because it *feels* productive without the emotional risk.

You can't fail at reorganizing your Notion workspace.

You *can* fail at a sales call.

Dont ask yourself "How do I get more done?"

Instead try this on: "What am I hiding from by staying busy?"

I ran a few time audits on founders last quarter.

Most of their work could be removed without impacting the business. 

That math doesn't scale. It doesn't even survive.

If you're 6+ months in and revenue hasn't moved:

Get yourself a time audit. 

I'll show you exactly what's bleeding hours and the 3 activities you should actually protect.

The your focus shifts to making revenue and away from wasting time. 

Comment "AUDIT" below if you're ready to stop hiding in your task list.

The companies that win don't outwork you. They out-prioritize you.

A script kiddie cloned my client's SaaS in 6 weeks.
 
Undercut pricing by 40%. Marketing plan: "Better but cheaper."
 
My client was panicking: "We need to Drop prices and open up more features"
 
I said: "Nope.  Ignore them". 
 
Here's why:
 
The clone copied the features. They couldn't copy the business.
 
6 months later:
 
• Clone: Dead (got bored of no customers). 
• My client: 1.3x revenue
 
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱:
 
1. Integration ecosystem (documented API )
2. Customer feedback loop (actually answering questions)
3. Brand positioning (understood where they mattered)
 
Most founders react to copycats by speeding up the feature treadmill.
 
That's exactly backwards.
 
When someone copies you, it means:
 
• You're worth copying
• They see features, not systems
• You need leverage, not velocity
 
The real question isn't "how do I stop copycats?"
 
It's: "𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝗜 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁?"

𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁. 

Getting people to buy it is the hard part. 

(Yes I know they are all challenging parts). 
 
If you're defending against clones by racing them - you're already losing.

Agree?

taplio

The Battle

Dr. Benjamin Ritter

Matthew Kantor

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreMatthew Kantor's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Dr. Benjamin Ritter

Matthew Kantor

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Matthew Kantor's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreMatthew Kantor's LinkedIn Performance