Help PhDs to kick-start careers in industry | Co-Founder and CEO @Alma.me | Building a bridge between academia and industry | Speaker | Scientist

Welcome to my profile!

I'm Elena, passionate about helping PhDs kickstart fulfilling careers outside of academia, and connect them with industry relevant positions. 

During my PhD journey, I realized that many PhDs face challenges transitioning from academia to industry. This difficulty often arises due to a lack of knowledge about potential positions, how to craft a resume for the industry, and prepare effectively for a job in that sector.

I've experienced this struggle firsthand. While pursuing my PhD, I felt lost. I knew that I no longer wanted to work in the lab; instead, I wanted to work with people, as that's where my passion lies. I went on my own discovery journey on "what is next".  I focused on the things I loved doing and thought of possible career options- after I identified what is next- I started working toward it by building a network in that area. 

Who am I, and how did I get here?

I recently graduated with a PhD in Medical Sciences from the Karolinska Institutet in beautiful Stockholm. 
As a Co-Founder and CEO of Alma.me my vision is to bridge the gap between academia and industry by providing information to help PhDs understand the array of opportunities after completing their studies and recognise the value of their skills beyond academia. 

If you are a PhD-student, Postdoc or tenure and you want to make the transition into industry follow me for more career advice.


Elena Hoffer, PhD

64% of scientists in industry feel good about their careers. Only 42% in academia do

A 2021 Nature survey put a number on something many of us already felt - and the findings are still just as relevant today (Link to full article in the comments)

In a survey of over 3,200 working scientists:
📊 64% of researchers in industry feel positive about their careers.
📊 Only 42% of those in academia say the same.

That's not a small gap.

And it gets more stark:
30% of academics reported experiencing discrimination, harassment or bullying at work.

In industry? 
That number drops to 15%.

This isn't anti-academia. It's pro-PhD and Postdocs.

The PhD journey is genuinely tough - and the structure around it doesn't always make it easier.

But I share this data because I talk to PhDs every single week who feel guilty for wanting to leave.

Who think wanting better pay, more stability, or a healthier work environment makes them somehow less serious about science.

It doesn't!
Wanting those things makes you human.

And the data shows - most people who make the move don't regret it.

Your curiosity, your skills, your love of solving hard problems - none of that disappears when you leave the lab.

It just finds a new place to live.

Want to hear real stories from PhDs who made the move?

🎙️ Listen to my podcast PostPhDirections - on YouTube or Spotify. 
Link in the comments 👇

♻️  Share to help a friend 

Happy Thursday  💙

Help PhDs to kick-start careers outside of academia | CEO @Alma.me | Complementing universities services for PhDs & Postdocs to secure jobs outside academia | Speaker I Podcast Host @PostPhDirections

Nobody talked about money during my PhD.

Wanting a good salary and a stable life felt like something you weren't supposed to admit.

As if wanting financial stability somehow made you less committed to science.

I've met senior academics who had never negotiated a salary in their entire career. And I've met researchers who couldn't afford to live near their own lab.
This is a problem - and it's one that follows PhDs into their industry job search.

Most PhDs I work with significantly underestimate their market value.
So here's a reality check, based on Glassdoor data (US market):

📊  Median PhD salaries by sector:
Information Technology: $193K
Transportation & Logistics: $183K
Pharma / Biotech: $139K
Consulting: $138K

These are not outliers. 
These are medians.

A few things worth knowing before you walk into a salary conversation:

1. Your PhD counts as work experience. 3–5 years of independent research, project management, and communication. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

2. The first number you say anchors the negotiation. Research your market range on Glassdoor and LinkedIn Salary before any conversation.

3. Asking for more is expected. Most companies build negotiation into their offers. Not negotiating is often leaving money on the table.

4. If they ask what you want - let them go first. Try: "I'd love to understand the budgeted range for this role first." You'll either confirm your number is in range - or avoid anchoring too low before you even know what's on the table.

5. If you don't know the salary range - ask. It's completely professional to say: "Could you share the salary range for this position?" Most companies know it. And it saves both sides a lot of time.

Your PhD is worth more than you think.

♻️ Repost to help a PhD friend

Happy Friday 💛

Salary data source: Glassdoor, June 2024, based on 13,327 submitted salaries (US market)

Dear PhDs,
You're allowed to change your mind.

About your field.
 About academia. 
About what success looks like for you.

The path you chose at 22 doesn't have to be the path you walk at 32. Or 42.

Look at me - I built my entire career towards being a scientist. 
A girl from a village of 500 people who worked her way to a PhD at Karolinska Institutet. That was the dream.

And then at 33, I started a company to help other PhDs find their next step.
Nobody saw that coming. 
Least of all me.

Changing direction isn't giving up. 
It's growing up.
It's evolving.

And it takes more courage than staying put.

Happy Sunday 💙

Most PhDs have a LinkedIn profile.
Almost none of them know how to use the platform.

I know - because I was one of them.
I had a profile and a photo. 

And I thought that was enough.
It wasn't.

LinkedIn helped me build my entire career beyond academia. 

My company. 
My community. 
A following of 140K people.

All of it started with learning how to actually use this platform.

An during the career's week by Proteintech Group in collaboration with Alma.Me I'm sharing some of my best tips - for free.

As part of Proteintech's Careers Week 2026 I'll be covering: 
🟣 How to build a profile that makes recruiters come to you 
🟣 How to network on LinkedIn without it feeling awkward or transactional 
🟣 How to use it actively in your job search - not just passively

And there's a full week of other sessions too - resume and interviewing in industry (by Angela Priest) grant writing and more.

Free. 
Daily. 
One week.

📅 March 23–27 - I'm on Wednesday March 25 
🕘 9 am CST / 2 pm GMT / 3 pm CEST

Register your free spot at ptglab.com - link in the comments 👇

♻️ Repost to help a PhD friend who needs this

Happy Tuesday 💛

It was a Monday evening during my PhD. Late in the lab. I was taking skin biopsies.

And I thought to myself:
I don't want to do this anymore. Lab work felt so isolating to me.

And I was at my best when I could be creative and brainstorm with others in meetings.

And immediately after that thought came another one, even scarier:
But what can I do?

I didn't wait for the answer to come to me.
I went looking for it.

I started reaching out to PhDs who did their PhD at Karolinska Institutet - just like me - and who had moved into all kinds of different directions.

Research equity analysis. 
Management consulting. 
Marketing. 
Sales.

And what struck me wasn't just that they had made it work -it was how many different paths were out there.

That's the thing nobody tells you when you're still inside the lab:
The world outside academia is not a narrow corridor.
It's more like a city you've never explored.

And the best way to navigate it is to find the people who already know the streets.

I wish someone had told me this earlier.
So here's what I'd go back and say to myself:
🟣 Your PhD is not a job title. It's a toolkit. 
🟣 "Leaving bench work" does not mean leaving science. It means finding a different way to use it. 
🟣 The skills you built matter far more than the specific techniques you used. 🟣 You are not starting over. You are redirecting. 
🟣 The confusion you feel right now is not a sign you're lost - it's a sign you're growing.

If you're in that in-between place right now - where you know you want something different but can't quite see what yet just know that feeling is valid.

And it won't last forever. 

Happy Monday 🩷

One of the most powerful tools for landing your first industry job after your PhD is completely free.

It takes 30 minutes a week or every second week.

And most PhDs either don't use it - or they use it wrong.
I'm talking about coffee chats aka informational interviews.

Not cold emails asking for a job. Not transactional networking that makes your skin crawl. 
Just… a real conversation with someone who has already made the jump.

Here's what I learned from doing many of them myself (and watching PhDs use them to completely change their job search):

- They show you what's actually out there — beyond R&D 
- They give you information no job description ever will 
- They build your network before you desperately need one 
- And sometimes? They lead to things you never expected

One PhD we worked with came back to me after a coffee chat and said:
"Elena, you won't believe it. They offered to refer me."

Was that the goal? No. 
But it's what happens when you show up with genuine curiosity instead of an agenda.

I just dropped a full YouTube video on this 
- how to find people to talk to
- how to reach out (without getting ignored)
- what questions to ask
- and how to stay connected after.

If you're during your PhD or Postdoc and wondering what's next - this one's for you.

👉 Link in the comments 

Happy Saturday 🩷

undefined undefined

Dr. Elena Hoffer. Still figuring it out.

When I started my bachelor's - figuring it out. 
When I did my master's - still figuring it out. 
When I started my PhD - figuring it out. 
When I finished my PhD and became Dr. Elena Hoffer - still figuring it out. When I stepped into marketing, content, LinkedIn - figuring it all out in real time. 
When I started my own company Alma.Me at 33 - absolutely figuring it out. When we hired our first team members - figuring that out too.

And honestly? 
I'm still figuring it out every single day.

I'll never forget working in the pharmacy after finishing my degree.

We had customers with doctor titles. PhDs. 
And I would look at them with pure awe - "What must one accomplish to get that title?"

Growing up in Germany, titles carry real weight. Prestige. You've made it.
I looked up to those people.

15 years later I got my own degree - Dr. Elena Hoffer - I felt so proud. I felt so many things at once. But I also felt something I didn't expect.
I still felt like I was figuring it out.

And that's when something slowly clicked for me:
We spend our whole lives chasing the next thing - the degree, the title, the job, the promotion - telling ourselves that will be the moment we finally feel like we've arrived.

But the destination was never the point.
It's always been about the journey. 
About who you become along the way.

Titles don't change that inner feeling as much as we think they will.
What changes us is the growth, the people, the experiences we collect.

If you're in the middle of something hard right now - a PhD, a career transition, building something from scratch - you don't have to have it all figured out.

None of us do.

Happy Monday 🩷

Most PhDs don't talk openly about not wanting to stay in academia.

Not to their supervisor. 
Not to their colleagues. 
Sometimes not even to their closest friends in the lab.

Nature Magazine just released a podcast episode on exactly this - why leaving academia is still a taboo topic, even now.

And one thing from it resonated deeply with what I see every day working with PhDs.

Josh, a neuroscience director who left academia in 2020, said:
"I felt much more comfortable talking to people who had already left. I was more scared about having those conversations with my colleagues than I was about the transition itself."

I hear this often in my work with PhDs.

Some are just starting to explore opportunities beyond academia. 
Some have already made up their mind.

But both carry that decision quietly - alone, for months - because saying it out loud in the lab still feels like admitting failure.

This is a culture problem. 
Not a personal one.

I didn't leave academia because I stopped loving science. 
I left because the system no longer aligned with my values. 
I wanted a different lifestyle. 
A different working environment.

And those are good enough reasons to leave - even if you love science deeply.
And wanting that - wanting stability, wanting a life that fits you - is not something you should ever feel ashamed of.

♻️  Share to help a friend 

Happy Wednesday 💙

Two women. 
Different continents. 
One shared belief:
PhDs and Postdocs deserve better career support than what currently exists.

That's how Alma.Me started.

Angela brings 20+ years of hiring experience - she's sat in the rooms where the decisions are made. 
I bring the PhD journey - the uncertainty, the identity shift, the figuring-it-out-as-you-go.
Together, we built something neither of us could have built alone.

But here's what I want to share today - When we first started building Alma.Me, imposter syndrome hit me hard.

Who am I to do this? 
I thought I needed to know everything before I could build anything.

Then Angela said something that changed how I saw it all.
She's sat in rooms with CEOs and senior executives most of her career - and she told me: nobody has it fully figured out. Everyone is trying their best with what they have. Everyone is winging it a little.

That was the moment something clicked.
Being in a role - whether it's a job, a business, or a new career - doesn't mean knowing everything.

It means:
Being open to learning. 
Willing to fail. 
Humble enough to let the data guide you. 
And resilient enough to keep going anyway.

Honestly? 
It's not that different from science.

In research, you don't know the answer before you run the experiment. 
You follow the data. 
You adjust. 
You try again.

Business is the same. 
Life is the same. 

Nobody truly knows. 
Most of the time, we're all figuring it out as we go.
And that's not a weakness. That's how growth works.

And an important thing I've learned - Sometimes it's the naive ones who bring the freshest perspective.

Not knowing "how things are supposed to be done" means you're not limited by how they've always been done.

Some of the boldest moves come from people who didn't know they "couldn't" do it.

So to every woman reading this today - If you're waiting until you feel ready: you won't. Start anyway. Start now!

If imposter syndrome is telling you "who are you to do this?": everyone in that room is asking the same question. 
You belong there.

If you feel like you don't know enough yet: that's not a gap. 
That's your edge. 
Fresh eyes see what experience sometimes misses.

You don't need to have it all figured out.
You need to be open. 
Curious. 
Willing to learn, fail, and keep going.

That's not just what building a business taught me.

That's what I see in every single woman who dares to take the next step - in her career, her job search, her life.

You are more ready than you think. 💜

Angela has been my biggest supporter - and my biggest challenger when I needed it most. She accepts me for exactly who I am. And pushes me to grow beyond who I thought I could be.

Today I celebrate her. 💜

Who is a woman that has inspired you to keep going? Who is your Angela?

Drop her name in the comments - let's celebrate them today. 👇

Happy International Women's Day to every woman daring to build something - a career, a company, a life - on her own terms. 💜

3 PhDs. All of them had sent over 200 applications.
All of them had heard back from almost no one.

And all three came to us at Alma.Me saying the same thing.
"I don't know what I am doing wrong."

Here's what was going on - and what changed for each of them:

PhD #1 was an Economics PhD who got feedback during an interview that her communication style wasn't landing with the hiring team.

That stung.
But instead of ignoring it, she reached out to us.

We worked on how she told her story - how she interacted and enageed in the interview conversation.

She landed her next offer with what the hiring manager called a "sweetheart deal." And she was specifically complimented on her communication.

PhD #2 too academia and did not receive any interview invitation after +200 applications.
We revamped the resume and taught her how to reach out to hiring managers directly.

Her response rate went from basically 0% to over 10%.

PhD #3 was getting interviews. But losing them.
He knew his research inside out.

What he hadn't learned was how to talk about it in a language that made a hiring manager lean forward.

We worked on how he framed his story.

He landed his role within 33 days of joining our program.

Here's the thing:
The problem was never the PhD.
The missing link was learning how to market themselves to an industry audience.

If you're stuck in the same loop - we take two PhDs a week into our program.

Link in the comments 👇

♻️ Repost to help a PhD friend

Happy Tuesday 💛

Everyone who thinks LinkedIn is a waste of time hasn't used it to its fullest.

I say this as someone who once during my PhD scrolled past it thinking - what's the point?

And then LinkedIn gave me:
A co-founder (thankful everyday for Angela Priest) 
A team. 
A podcast full of incredible humans. 
And friendships I didn't see coming.

One of those is Philipp Baaske.
Fellow PhD. 
Fellow founder. 
And honestly - my kind of people.

Successful, kind, and humble. 
That combination is rarer than it should be.
I read his book - The Honorable Entrepreneur - and I really loved it.
Not the kind of book that makes you feel like everyone else has it figured out except you.
Raw, honest, real. 

He writes about building a business the way it actually feels - the highs, the 
lows, the moments where you genuinely don't know if it's going to work out.

If you're a founder, a PhD, or just someone looking for an inspiring story told without the filter - read it.

Yesterday, I finally got to meet Philipp in Munich for dinner.

Great conversation. 
And yes - I finally got my signed copy. 

None of this happens without LinkedIn.
Was it uncomfortable in the beginning and a ton of work (and still is ;))? 
Absolutely.

Would I do it again every single day? 
Yes - without question. 

Philipp has been on my podcast PostPhDirections sharing his journey from PhD to founder. If you haven't listened yet, go find it.

And if you're ready to start your own LinkedIn journey -I'm sharing my best tips on LinkedIn networking and job searching at Proteintech Group's Career Week, in collaboration with Alma.Me.

It's free. Join us. 🎉

Registration link in the comments 👇 

You genuinely don't know who is one connection away. 

Happy Wednesday 🩷

Most PhDs I talk to have the same reaction when I mention networking:
"I'm not good at that." 
"It feels fake." 
"I wouldn't even know where to start."

Academia does not necessarily train you on this. 
You're trained to let your work speak for itself. 
To publish. 
To present data. 
To be rigorous.

Not to send a message to a stranger on LinkedIn and start a conversation.

But here's the truth:

The job market doesn't work the way academia does.

Many roles are filled through networks. Through people who know people. Through a conversation that happened months before a job was even posted.

Networking isn't about being loud or salesy.
It's about being visible, being human, and building real  relationships.

One of the PhDs in our program landed 3 interviews in a single day.

Not from applying to 3 jobs.
From 1 referral from a friend. 
From 1 referral from a new connection he'd met online. 
From 1 cold application - followed up with a direct message to the hiring manager.

That's what increasing your "luck surface area" actually looks like.
And the crazy part of my own story (most don't know) ?

Alma.Me only exists because I networked on LinkedIn.

Angela Priest - my co-founder, with 20+ years of hiring experience - I met her here. One conversation that literally changed the trajectory of my entire professional life.

If you're a PhD who thinks networking isn't for you (btw, it's outside most peoples  comfort zone - you are not alone) -  I'd invite you to reconsider.

Not because it's easy.
But because it works.

🎙️ I talked about this in the very first episode of my podcast PostPhDirections - with Angela herself. How we met, why networking matters, and what it really looks like in practice.

Listen here: https://lnkd.in/dPHrxGVv

Happy Thursday  🩷

This photo was taken at the networking session I organised as part of the PhD course I ran at Karolinska Institutet. By the way, we are running it again - registration opens tomorrow. 
Best part? 
You get ECTS points and it counts towards your PhD degree 😉
Stay tuned if you are a PhD student at KI, or another Swedish or European university (open to all -but limited slots).

I used to think leaving academia meant starting over from zero.
That's what it felt like.

Years of training. Papers. A PhD thesis I was genuinely proud of. 
And then the thought of leaving felt like throwing it all in the bin. 

Like: "If I leave, was it even worth it?"

I've spoken with so many PhDs who feel exactly this. The sunk cost. The guilt. 

But here's what I've learned since leaving:
You don't start over. 
You start differently.

Everything you built in academia – the rigor, the resilience, the ability to sit with uncertainty for years and still push forward – that goes with you.

It doesn't disappear when you leave the lab.
It shows up in how you approach problems. 
In how you learn fast in new environments. 
In the way you think.

I didn't start over when I left.
I started Alma.Me.

And I built it from exactly the skills I thought were "only academic."

If you're in that place right now – wondering if leaving means losing everything you worked for – I promise you. It doesn't.

If you're at a point where you're questioning whether your path is still yours - listen to my podcast episode with Armando Cázares-Körner.

He left academia with a Science paper. Science! He had every credential to build a successful academic career - and he still chose something different.

It's one of the most inspiring conversations I've had. 

🎙️ Listen to the full episode: Link in the comments 👇 

Happy Monday 🩷

Dear PhDs 

Every conversation you have is building your network.

Every application teaches you something about what you want.

Every interview makes you better at the next one.

Even when it feels like nothing is happening, you're moving forward.

Trust the process.

Happy Sunday 💙

Most PhDs spend months sending applications into the void.

No feedback. No idea what's going wrong. And they often experience just silence or rejection.

Here's is the things the resume is often the first thing that kills your chances.
Not your skills. 
Not your experience. 
Your resume.

And the frustrating part?
You don't know what a hiring manager actually sees when they open it.
That's exactly why Angela Priest and I created the Resume Review - Live session.

Angela has 20+ years of hiring experience.
She has been on the other side of the table - literally deciding who moves forward and who doesn't.

On March 12th at 6PM CET / 10AM MST, she's going to show you:

🔍 What hiring managers look for in the first 10 seconds 
❌ The most common mistakes PhDs make (and don't even realize) 
✅ How to fix them - live, in real time

This is part of our PhD-to-Industry Ready Series - free live events designed to give you the information you actually need to make your transition work.

No fluff. No "just believe in yourself" advice. Real feedback. Real fixes.

👉 Sign up link in the comments or scan the QR code 

♻️  Share to help a friend 

Happy Friday 🩷

Your academic CV is costing you interviews.

Most PhDs don't realise this until they've sent 100+ applications and heard almost nothing back.

And the frustrating part?

It's not your skills. 
It's not your experience. 
It's how you're presenting them.

A 4-page academic CV that leads with publications and conference talks tells a recruiter almost nothing about what you can actually do for them.

Here's what I see again and again: 
🟣 PhDs describing what they studied - not the outcomes they created 
🟣 Resumes written for an academic audience - not a hiring manager 
🟣 Brilliant candidates getting filtered out before anyone even reads their story

That's why I'm so glad my co-founder of Alma.Me -  Angela Priest is speaking at Proteintech Group's Careers Week 2026.

Angela has 20+ years of hiring experience. She has sat on the other side of the table hundreds of times. She knows exactly what makes a resume get read - and what makes it get ignored.

On Tuesday she's running a live Industry Resume Writing Workshop - for free.
🟣 What hiring managers actually look for 
🟣 How to translate your research into business language 
🟣 How to go from academic CV to industry resume that gets responses

📅 Tuesday March 24 
🕘 9 am CST / 2 pm GMT / 3 pm CEST

Register your free spot: https://lnkd.in/d5-DaDnN

♻️ Repost to help a PhD friend in need

Happy Saturday 💛

Dear PhDs,

Rest is not the enemy of progress.

It just feels that way when you’ve been trained to measure your worth in output.

More papers. 
More experiments. 

But some of the best ideas - the clearest thinking, the boldest decisions -  don’t come from pushing harder.

They come from stepping back.

Give yourself permission to rest this Sunday.

It’s not time wasted.
It’s time invested.

Happy Sunday 🩷

The job market in 2026 is shifting. Here's why that might actually be good news for PhDs --> learn here how to position yourself best

Angela Priest has 25+ years of industry experience (20 in hiring )- she's seen market shifts come and go.

And she sat down with me to break down exactly what's happening right now.
Because there are real shifts - and some of them are actually working in your favour as a PhD.

In our latest episode of PostPhDirections we talked about:
🟣 What's actually happening in hiring right now (and why uncertainty is becoming "the new normal" for companies)
🟣 Why entry-level jobs aren't disappearing - they're just changing shape
🟣 The roles with the highest demand for PhDs right now (hint: data fluency is your secret weapon)
🟣 The one skill listed in 85% of all job ads - and what companies actually mean by it (it's not what most PhDs think)
🟣 The one unspoken hiring criteria that almost no article will tell you about

And my personal favourite part of the conversation?
Angela said something that I think every PhD needs to hear:
"PhDs assume that the people they're competing against have the same level of skill. They don't."

You have more than you think.
You just have to learn how to say it.

🎙️ New episode is out now - link in the comments 👇

Happy Sunday 💛

59 - Learning German and getting a driver's licence.

I love this so much.

Because we spend so much time thinking we've missed our window. 
Too late to switch. 
Too senior to start over. 
Too established to take a risk.

But this post is proof that there is no such thing as too late.
I left academia at 33 and built a company from scratch. 
First in my family to do it. 
No roadmap. 
No guarantee.
Just a decision.

If you're a PhD sitting on the fence about making your move into industry - let this be your sign.

The window is open. 
It always is.

Dare to take the step. 

Happy Monday 🩷

Academic leadership training I Professor of NeuroImmunotherapy l Dean of Doctoral Education l Empowering professional leadership and shaping PhD education l Have trained 8000+ PhD supervisors l #MADBob

At age:
18 - I left home for University
21 - I finished my B.Sc
24 - I finished my PhD
27 - I moved to Sweden
28 - I learnt to speak Swedish
31 - I became an Associate Professor
33 - I became a research group leader
39 - I became Study Director in my department
42 - I became Central Study Director at the university
47 - I became a Professor
48 - I won the KI prize for pedagogy
53 - I became Dean of Doctoral Education
58 - I won the FEBS Education award
59 - I learnt to speak German
59 - I got my driver’s licence
 
What is my view on all this?
 
·     LIFELONG learning means learning throughout your life – there is always something new to learn.
·     Some things you wait longer for than you think you should.
·     Some things happen when you think they should, or even faster.
·     Some things surprise you.
·     Each step is a step forward, a new experience.
 
Don’t spend time looking back with regret – your history is already written forever.

Don’t only focus on where you are today – it won’t get you anywhere long-term.

Don’t look to the future with fear of the unknown, but rather with peaceful anticipation.
 
Follow this discussion of doctoral education via #MADBob
If you are interested in personal or group leadership training for academic supervisors/leaders, check out my website. I have taught over 8000 supervisors to date.

#MADBob #PhDsupervision #AcademicLeadership #DoctoralEducation #ResearchLeadership

A Psychology Postdoc we worked with expected $70-80K for her first industry job and she landed one for $150K.

She had two years of postdoc experience. She came to us knowing she wanted industry.

She just had no idea what she was actually worth.

Her number in her head?
$70–80K 

That felt "realistic" to her.

That felt like what a postdoc jumping into industry could ask for. 
We see this so often. During a Postdoc you often make around 60K, and 80K feels like a realistic increase in salary. 

PhDs who have spent years in an environment where salaries are fixed, low, and non-negotiable:

They  carry that ceiling into their industry job search.
They don't know what the market actually pays.
They  don't know how to negotiate.
They don't know that their skills are genuinely scarce and genuinely valuable.

So they undersell themselves before they've even started.
What changed for her:
- We showed her what roles at her level were actually paying 
- We worked on how she positioned her experience in interviews 
- We helped her to get confident that her skillset is worth more than 80K

She landed a Senior Data Scientist offer for $150K (US salary).
Nearly double what she thought she could ask for.

This is what happens when you finally operate with the right information.

We take two PhDs a week into the Alma.Me Job Accelerator Program.
If you're ready, apply here: https://lnkd.in/dwhAW8xQ

♻️ Repost to help a postdoc know their worth

Happy Friday 💙

🩺I take researchers from goals to published results 🇮🇳 🇬🇧 Founder II Academic Writing Mentor || AI researcher || Homeopath ✅️Need Research Solutions❓️ Go to my ABOUT section.🔻

I specialize in testing AI tools for literature reviews, academic writing, editing and statistical analysis, sharing insights that enhance research productivity and workflow.

As a PhD in Life Sciences, I am passionate about guiding academics and PhDs from research concept to completion, ensuring they have the right tools, methodologies and mentorship to succeed.

🎯 How I Help Researchers & PhDs??

Through 

🟪 RESEARCH MADE CLEAR 🟪

I offer consultancy services in:

✅ Scientific Writing & Editing: Ensuring clarity, coherence and impact in research papers.
✅ PhD Mentorship & Research Methodology: Supporting scholars in thesis writing, research design, and proposal development.
✅ Data & Statistical Analysis: Providing expertise in biostatistics, data analysis and result interpretation.
✅ Faculty & Student Development: Training in AI-powered research tools & ethical considerations.
✅️ Webinars & Workshops: How to use AI tools for Literature Review, research writing and Research Management, ethically.

🔍 My Experience & Research Contributions:

With 10+ years of experience across multidisciplinary research projects, I have:
📌 Led & coordinated multiple research trials and longitudinal surveys as a Research Manager.
📌 Published 8+ peer-reviewed papers in evidence-based medical writing.
📌 Developed the MAPNI questionnaire—a validated tool assessing perceived stigma towards mental illness in India.
📌 Taught Research Methodology & Biostatistics as an 'Assistant Professor', mentoring 500+ academic professionals in thesis & dissertation writing.
📌 Supervised successful scholarship applications for the Short-Term Studentship in Homoeopathy (STSH, CCRH, India).

📢 Let’s Connect
✅️Need expert guidance in research writing, AI tools or statistical analysis?
✅️Looking for collaborations, training sessions or mentorship?

💌 Email: dps@researchmadeclear.com
📩 DM me here on LinkedIn!

Dr Priya Singh PhD💜MD (Hom.)

Nobody told me that getting a PhD would feel like being paid in pennies to have an existential crisis every single day. 🎓

Let me be real with you.

I've supervised PhDs over the years. And the ones who struggle the most aren't the ones who weren't warned.

So here's the warning I wish someone had given me and every student I've ever mentored.

The PhD experience nobody posts about:
✅ You will spend 6 months on an experiment that leads nowhere. 
✅ Your supervisor will give you two-line feedback on a chapter you bled over for three months. 
✅ You'll go to a conference, hear someone present your idea, and panic. 
✅ You'll have days where you genuinely cannot remember why you started this journey.

And the loneliest part? 
Everyone around you will look like they have it together.

My take on how you can survive:

1. Shrink the goal, daily. 
Stop staring at "finish the thesis." 
Ask yourself one question every morning: "What is the ONE thing I can finish today?" 
A paragraph. One analysis.
Done is better than perfect and every single time.

2. Your supervisor is not your therapist, build your circle. 
Find 2-3 fellow PhD students you can be brutally honest with. 
Not to vent endlessly, but to reality-check. 

3. Protect your mornings like they're sacred. 
The world will eat your day alive if you let it. 
Your deepest thinking happens in the first 90 minutes after you wake up. Guard that window. No emails. No Slack. No social media. 
Just your work.

4. Write ugly first drafts, always. 
Writer's block in academia is almost always perfectionism in disguise. 
Give yourself permission to write badly. A messy draft you can fix. A blank page you cannot.

5. Celebrate micro-wins, seriously. 
Submitted a paper? Celebrate. Survived a brutal seminar? Celebrate. Understood a concept that stumped you for weeks? Celebrate. 
Your brain needs proof that progress is happening, even when the finish line feels invisible.

6. Detach your identity from your research. 
This one is hard. But your paper getting rejected is NOT you getting rejected. Your methodology being questioned is NOT your intelligence being questioned. 
The work is the work. You are more than it.

7. Move your body. Non-negotiable. 
30 minutes of walking has saved more PhD students from burnout than any productivity app ever will. 
The brain solves problems when the body is in motion. 

The truth about finishing a PhD?It's about being the one who keeps showing up on the days it's exciting, and especially on the days it absolutely isn't.

To every PhD student reading this, you're not behind. You're not broken. You're just in the middle of something hard.
Keep going. 💡

PS: What else would you add? Share in the comments.

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh, Founder Research Made Clear for more research guidance.

For research tutorials and AI tool, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2

Dr Priya Singh PhD💜MD(Hom.)

Helping PhDs & researchers complete and publish high-quality research PhD mentor || Thesis reviewer || Academic writing expert Training research professionals in working with AI

Plagiarism is rarely about “copying on purpose.”

Most of the time, it happens because of poor note-keeping, rushed writing, or not understanding how to paraphrase properly.

Since I’m sharing this infographic on plagiarism detection tools, let me add something important:

Tools detect. You prevent.

Here are a few ways you can prevent Plagiarism:
1️⃣ Separate reading notes from writing drafts.
When you take notes, clearly mark what is a direct quote and what is your own interpretation. Confusion here is where most accidental plagiarism starts.

2️⃣ Paraphrase with understanding, not synonyms.
If you cannot explain the idea without looking at the source, you haven’t understood it yet. Close the paper. Write from memory. Then check accuracy.

3️⃣ Cite early, not at the end.
Don’t wait until the final draft to add references. Insert citations while writing. It saves you from guesswork later.

4️⃣ Synthesize, don’t summarize paper by paper.
Strong academic writing compares, contrasts, and integrates studies. If your paragraph reads like “Author A said… Author B said…”, you need deeper synthesis.

5️⃣ Use plagiarism checkers as a quality check, not a rescue tool.
Run them before submission. But remember: a low similarity score does not automatically mean strong scholarship.

Build a clean research workflow and plagiarism becomes much less likely.

PS: What strategies have helped you maintain academic integrity in your writing? 
Share in the comments.

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh, Founder Research Made Clear for more research guidance.

For research tutorials and AI tool, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2

Nobody warned me that a PhD would turn me into someone who spends 20 minutes choosing between 'however' and 'nevertheless' 🤣 

Yesterday I spent 3 hours on one paragraph.

Not three hours writing it.

Three hours *earning* it.

I stared at the opening sentence until it stopped making sense. Rewrote it six times. Convinced myself my entire argument was unoriginal. Googled two papers I'd already read. Made tea. Came back. Deleted everything.

And then, finally one paragraph that actually said something.

This is the part of academic writing nobody posts about.

The iceberg beneath "I wrote today" looks like:
→ Questioning whether your argument is even original
→ Overthinking a single word for 20 minutes
→ Realising the paragraph says nothing and starting over
→ Tightening, rephrasing, removing, aligning
→ And yes… questioning your life choices somewhere in the middle

After years of writing (and suffering through this process), here's what actually helps:

𝟭. 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘂𝗴𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁
Your first draft isn't supposed to be good. It's supposed to exist. 
Get the idea down before your inner critic shows up for work.

𝟮. 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵 = 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮
If you can't say what your paragraph is about in one sentence, it's doing too much. 
Split it. Simplify it. Be ruthless.

𝟯. 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱
Awkward phrasing hides on a screen. Your ears catch what your eyes miss. 
If you stumble reading it, your reader will too.

𝟰. 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘆
You can't edit what you just wrote. Your brain autocorrects your own mistakes. 
Sleep on it. Come back fresh.

𝟱. 𝗔𝘀𝗸: 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴?
After every draft, ask yourself: if a smart friend read this, what would they take away? If the answer is "not much" that's your edit.

If you've been sitting with one paragraph all week, you're not failing.

You're doing the actual work.

The messy, invisible, necessary work that never makes it into anyone's highlight reel.

Keep going. That paragraph matters more than you think.

PS: Which one of these hits a little too close to home?
Share in the comments

REPOST to help others

Follow Dr Priya Singh, Founder Research Made Clear for more research guidance.

For research tutorials and AI tool guides, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2

How to use Claude for Academic research 
PhD students.... Here's a complete research workflow using Claude 👇 

STEP 1 — CREATE A RESEARCH PROJECT AS YOUR HOME BASE
→ Go to Projects and create one per thesis chapter or paper topic (free plan gives you up to 5) 
→ Upload your foundational PDFs, draft documents, and datasets 
→ Set a permanent instruction: "Act as a rigorous academic supervisor. Flag uncertain claims. Maintain scholarly tone throughout."
Every conversation inside that project now has your materials and rules baked in with no re-explaining your context ever again.

STEP 2 — UPLOAD AND INTERROGATE YOUR PAPERS
The free plan supports PDF, DOCX, CSV, TXT and more, uploaded directly into chat.
→ Upload your own draft: "Identify the gaps in my literature review compared to these uploaded sources"

STEP 3 — USE WEB SEARCH FOR LIVE SOURCE DISCOVERY
Toggle on the search icon before typing your query.
→ "Find recent peer-reviewed studies on microplastics and cognitive development published after 2021" 
Use this as a first-pass discovery tool, then verify through Scopus or Web of Science before finalising citations.

STEP 4 — CONNECT YOUR EXISTING RESEARCH TOOLS
Connectors let Claude access your apps and services, retrieve your data, and take actions within connected services. 
Go to Customize → Connectors to set them up.
Google Drive & Docs
Gmail & Google Calendar
Notion
Slack 
Gamma
Zapier 
Instead of simply supplying text to be copied elsewhere, Claude can use Connectors to work inside the tools people already rely on. 

STEP 5 — BUILD SKILLS FOR REPEATABLE ACADEMIC WORKFLOWS
Skills are reusable instruction sets that teach Claude to do specific tasks consistently, every single time.
→ Go to customize → Skills and enable built-in options 
→ Or build your own. 
For example, a peer review workflow that always checks methodology gaps, sample size, and statistical rigour 
→ Once saved, Claude automatically invokes the right skill when the task matches, no re-prompting needed

STEP 6 — VISUALISE YOUR FINDINGS WITH ARTIFACTS
Don't just read your synthesis, map it visually.
→ "Build a visual table comparing the research methodologies of these 6 papers" 
Artifacts opens a live interactive panel, no coding needed, results in under 60 seconds. 

Always manually verify your final citation list. 
Claude uses web search, not a curated academic database. 
It can occasionally surface unverifiable references. 

PS: What research task is still eating your time that shouldn't be? 
Share in the comments. 

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh Founder, Research Made Clear for more insights.

For research tutorials and AI tool guides, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2

📌 For those who saw this 3 days ago...yes, you're not imagining it. I accidentally deleted the original post and LinkedIn, helpfully, offers no recycle bin or recovery option. So here we are again.

#PhDLife #AcademicResearch #LiteratureReview

HOW TO CREATE CHARTS, DIAGRAMS & INTERACTIVE VISUALS WITH CLAUDE? 

Attention PhD students and researchers....this changes how you explain your work.
Claude just got a powerful new ability.

It can now build custom charts, diagrams, and interactive visuals right inside the conversation.

No extra tools. 
No exporting. 
No waiting.

You describe what you need and the visual appears instantly, right there in the chat.

Why does this matter for researchers?

We spend years doing complex work.

But our biggest challenge is rarely the research itself.

It is explaining it clearly to others.

To supervisors. 
To journal reviewers. 
To conference audiences. 
To funding committees.

And the truth is simple: a good visual communicates in 5 seconds what 3 paragraphs cannot.

Here is what you can now do with Claude:
✅ Paste your statistical results → ask for a chart → get one instantly, right in chat
✅Describe your literature review themes → ask for a concept map → see the connections visualized
✅Explain your methodology → ask for a flowchart → share it with your supervisor in minutes
✅Sketch out your theoretical framework → ask for a diagram → use it in your next presentation

The old way:
Type your analysis → struggle to explain it in words → hope the reader understands.

The new way:
Type your analysis → ask Claude to show it visually → the reader sees it immediately.

Showing beats telling. Every time.

For a PhD student writing their 80,000-word thesis, one clear diagram can do what 500 words cannot.

For a researcher presenting at a conference , one interactive visual can turn confused faces into nodding heads.

For a scientist writing a grant proposal, one well-designed chart can win funding that pages of text would not.

This is a communication upgrade and that is the one skill that separates great researchers from invisible ones.

Try it today.

PS: What part of your research would you most want to visualize?
Share in the comments. 

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh Founder, Research Made Clear for more insights.

For research tutorials and AI tool guides, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2.

Most PhD students I know are using AI tools daily.
Very few were ever taught how to use them well.

That's not a criticism. It's just a gap nobody really addressed formally. 

You learn by doing, by trial and error, and sometimes by producing outputs that look convincing but fall apart under scrutiny.

Anthropic's free course platform is one of the more serious attempts I've seen to close that gap.

What makes it useful is focus on things that actually matter in academic work:
— Understanding why a model responds the way it does, not just accepting the output 
— Building prompts that are methodologically sound, not just "good enough" 
— Evaluating AI outputs critically — the same way you'd evaluate any source

Worth noting: the foundational AI literacy courses were co-developed with university professors and released under Creative Commons. 
Any institution can adapt them. 

📌 Why should researchers and students care?

✅ It's completely free: no credit card, no subscription 
✅ Self-paced: work around your seminar schedule 
✅ Earn official certificates to add to your LinkedIn or CV 
✅ Built with input from academic institutions, not just Silicon Valley engineers 
✅ No prior AI experience needed for most tracks

We are at a moment where who gets AI skills will shape who leads in every field. 

Platforms like this are closing that gap and I think that matters enormously.

None of this replaces domain expertise. 
But if your research group is integrating AI tools without a shared understanding of how they work, that's a real methodological risk.

Worth an afternoon of your time.

👉 Start here: https://lnkd.in/ef3sme6e

PS: Have you tried any of the courses yet? 
Share in the comments.

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh Founder, Research Made Clear for more insights.

For research tutorials and AI tool guides, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2


#AnthropicAcademy #ClaudeAI #FreelearningAI #ResearchTools

PhDs.. How many research hours have been wasted aligning arrows in PowerPoint?

Researchers spend far too much time creating publication-ready diagrams, flowcharts, and plots 

work that is crucial for communicating ideas 
but 
frustratingly manual and time-consuming.

A new AI-driven tool called #PaperBanana #PaperPlot aims to change that. 

Developed by Google Cloud AI Research, PaperBanana is designed to automate the generation of scientific illustrations directly from your research text. 

📌 What PaperBanana Offers:
 • Automatically generates methodology diagrams, system schemas, and statistical plots from natural language descriptions of your research. 
 • Uses a pipeline of specialized AI agents that retrieve reference examples, plan structure, style the layout, render the visuals, and refine them for clarity and accuracy. 
 • Produces outputs that match academic conventions more closely than general image generators, with reported strong performance on readability and aesthetic quality in benchmark testing. 
 • Can even polish rough hand-drawn sketches into polished figures ready for publication. 


#PaperBanana directly addresses a persistent bottleneck in the research workflow.

The hours spent manually drafting and formatting figures freeing researchers to focus on ideas and analysis rather than layout and design. 

📌 A Notable Drawback:
At this time, PaperBanana is a paid tool with no free trial option, which may limit access for students and researchers without budget support, an important consideration for adoption. 

PS:Given that figures play a crucial role in how research is judged and interpreted, how comfortable would you be using an AI-generated diagram directly in a journal submission or conference paper without substantial manual review or adjustment?

Share in the comments.

REPOST to help others.

Follow Dr Priya Singh, Founder Research Made Clear for more research guidance.

For research tutorials and AI tool guides, subscribe to my YT channel: https://lnkd.in/e8zWuWV2


Google Launches Paper Banana: Agentic AI That Creates Your Scientific Diagrams

taplio

The Battle

Elena Hoffer, PhD

Dr Priya Singh PhD💜MD (Hom.)

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreElena Hoffer, PhD's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreDr Priya Singh PhD💜MD (Hom.)'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Elena Hoffer, PhD

Dr Priya Singh PhD💜MD (Hom.)

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Elena Hoffer, PhD's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreDr Priya Singh PhD💜MD (Hom.)'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreElena Hoffer, PhD's LinkedIn Performance