Fabian Werkmeister

I help you to become fluent in Data and enable you to translate between business & tech ★ Data Scientist @FUNKE ★ 🐍Python 🤖Data Science 🛠️Data Engineering

Why do so many data projects fail to deliver real business value?
Because they often start with a technical discussion, not a business problem.
➡️ And you've likely felt the same frustration as so many others...

Investing in a complex data solution only to find it's over-engineered, over-budget, and doesn't actually solve your core challenge.
You're left with high costs, slow processes and no actionable outcome.

Imagine instead a data solution that is simple, powerful, and cost-effective. One that feels like it was designed exactly for your business and just works.
This is what I can build for you.

I started my career on the business side and switched to data along the way, where my deep passion for that field motivated me to self-taught all the skills I now have.
Sitting on both sides of the table allowed me to really understand and connect both worlds.

This is what you get, if you work with me:

Business-First Approach:
You get a business-minded partner, which listens to your challenges first to ensure the solution we build together is one you actually need. No confusing tech-speak, just pure focus on actionable results for you and your business.

Pragmatic & Cost-Effective Solutions:
You get a lean, powerful, and low-maintenance data analytics platform on Google Cloud Platform, which simply works.

Collaborative & Transparent Process:
You will be a partner in the process, not a spectator. Through regular check-ins and feedback, we ensure alignment at every stage to build something, which actually helps you.

➡️ If you're ready to finally get results from your data, connect or DM me and let’s chat!

Data Scientist

No Budget for Managed ETL? 💰
Here is a lean and cost-effective alternative 👇 

Managed ETL services can kill your budget
They are designed to punish you for your growth
They feel essential, but their pricing will spiral as your data volume increases

But you can also build something yourself
Use dltHub and serverless functions / containers to perform data ingestion:
✅ You only pay for execution time, aligning cost directly with usage
✅ You can focus on the actual problem, since dlt does the heavy lifting for you

What's the biggest headache dlt solved for you recently? ✌ 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian👋

I write about building lean and cost-effective analytics platforms on GCP

If you like my content
👉 Follow 
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

Lean & cost-efficient data systems on GCP for businesses to finally turn their data into decisions | 🛠️ Senior Data Engineer @ FUNKE

I don't have a linear career in data.
For a long time, I let that be a limiting belief.

I studied economics and worked in that field for some years
I learned what KPIs are and what really drives numbers and businesses
I did a lot of powerpoints and fought with excel, but this wasn’t a profession for me

So I took a data science bootcamp and switched to data
I still remember how everyone in the bootcamp was way better at coding than me
For years in data, I felt I was always playing catch-up to the people who grew up with this stuff

But with time and more seniority, this perception shifted
I notice that using tech and tools doesn’t generate value on its own
Value is created in knowing when to use which tool to drive a business action

With this in mind, I began to see my non-linear career path as my biggest asset.
Since I lived in both worlds, I also know very well how to connect them.
I start with the action, then build the absolute minimal system for that.

I may not be the best coder or technical expert out there
But I speak and understand business language
And this enables true solutions

If you’re also coming from a non-traditional path, stop trying to fit the mold.
Your diverse background isn't a weakness.
It can be your ultimate advantage.


What’s an unexpected asset your career path has given you?

---

Hi, I'm Fabian👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

The biggest lie in data
"We just need a new tool"


A new tool won't fix a broken process.
A new tool won't magically create a data-driven culture.
The most successful projects follow a business-first mantra.
👉 Tools are the last piece of the puzzle.

✅ Focus on Culture: Talk with the business teams.
✅ Focus on Processes: How are things done right now and how should they work in the future?
✅ Focus on the User: Identify the friction points between the data and the action or decision taken by an end user.

Remember:
Tools are just the vehicle - culture and process are the engine!

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian 👋

I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

Stop obsessing over the architecture diagram.
Obsess over the problem.

❌ Typical data project goes like this:

Month 1-2: Vendor selection
Month 3-4: Pipelines and modeling
Month 5: Dashboarding
Month 6: Show it to the business
(and find out it’s useless)


✅ The Value Path looks like this:

1. The "Why" Phase (40% of effort)
Deep stakeholder interviews.
Find out problems and decisions to be made.
Don't write a single line of SQL until you know that.

2. The "How" Phase (10% of effort):
Lean tech selection.
Most tools deliver the same output.
Choose what is convenient and available.
(if possible choose also what is cheap)

3. The "Build" Phase (50% of effort):
Minimalist implementation.
Automating only what is necessary.
Build the shortest bridge between data & decision.


You can build a "perfect" scalable platform in 6 months that nobody uses

Or you can build an "imperfect" targeted solution in 6 weeks that changes the business.

—
Hi, I'm Fabian👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

My data team was most often seen as a cost center.
Here is how we shifted this to become enablers 👇

I used to build the thing I was asked for.
I finished the tickets.
I delivered the code.

But that often left behind a black box solution that no one on the business side truly understood. 
A technical problem was solved without transferring the value of it to the business.
That's how data projects solely generate costs.

Do this instead
✅ Prioritizing the business problem over technical solutions.
✅ Designing the platform to deliver a single, clear business action.
✅ Measuring success by time or costs saved, not by processed data volume.
✅ Transferring knowledge so the business team can understand and act on the data without you.

That’s how you build trust.
That’s how you generate value tied to the costs.
That’s how your projects and your team are seen as an investment.

TL;DR
Any data project needs to directly and measurably impact the bottom-line of the business
➡️ if your project doesn’t deliver this, it will only be seen as a financial liability

---

Hi, I'm Fabian 👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

SQL is important for a data engineer
But the most valuable skill isn’t taught in tutorials

I’m not talking about Terraform, Python or BigQuery
These are merely tools and techniques to work with data
My most important skill is the ability to translate:

Business ➡️ Tech
Stakeholder: "I need real-time data for my weekly sales report"
Me: "We need a simple batch pipeline that updates data each morning"

Tech ➡️ Business
Tech: "We implemented incremental loading for big source tables"
Me: "Your Monday morning dashboard will now be ready at 8:00 AM instead of 10:30 AM."

When you bridge this gap with communication, you do two things:
👉 You protect the business from over-engineering (and over-spending)
👉 You work on things stakeholders actually care about (time and money)

Learn to speak and understand business language
That is how you move from a data engineer to a strategic business partner

----------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian👋

I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect

The era of Big Data is over
The era of Big Action will finally unlock the value of data

For the past decade, billions were spent on data stacks
We now have 100+ tools to pipe, clean and visualize data
And yet, decision-making velocity hasn't improved

The systems we built were designed for observation, not operation
Your data system is worthless until that potential is converted into movement

Let's look at a simple example:
➡️ 100 customers haven't purchased in 3 months

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐲
- Discover this (most businesses don't even get to this point)
- Download CSV
- Format in Excel
- Upload to HubSpot
- Manually trigger "we miss you" email
- By the time you do this, 50% of them have already moved to a competitor

❌ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗸𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺


𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝘄𝗮𝘆
- Your system detects these automatically
- Your system pushes these to HubSpot
- An email workflow is triggered
- You get a ping to approve this
- Emails are sent

✅ 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻


Data systems need to pivot
From a reporting source to a trigger
From "what happened?" to action-oriented systems.


𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 "𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁-𝘁𝗼-𝗰𝘀𝘃" 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱? 😉 

------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian Werkmeister👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect

I used to be a data snob
And this attitude prevented valuable solutions

As a data engineer, I think in terms of outputs
I designed whole workflows with a clear result in mind
This was most often a nice dashboard or an automated report

When someone asked for an "Export to Excel" button, I rolled my eyes
I thought "Why do I build of all this if it just ends in a spreadsheet?"
I was missing the point completely!

❌ My job isn't to dictate how people work.
✅ My job is to enable them to work.


If a finance manager is faster in Excel, my fancy dashboard is actually a bottleneck.
If a sales rep needs a CSV to close a deal, my shiny report is blocking revenue.
My business users know way better how they can work efficiently than I do!

👎 I stopped being religious about the tools
👍 I started being religious about the outcome


Now, my philosophy is simple:
👉 Build the pipeline
👉 Ensure the data is available and trusted
👉 Let the user decide the last mile to be actionable

If that means an Excel export or a csv-file?
So be it.

The result at the end of the day is what counts.
Not the tool they used to get there.

----------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian Werkmeister 👋

I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP

👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect

Does your data project have a six-figure price tag?
Bad news, you’ve already failed

A six-figure data stack is not an investment.
It’s a financial liability.
Start with something super simple👇

✅ Identify the Core Problem:
Stop looking at tables and talk to people.
👉 What specific business problem is causing pain?
➡️ "We are spending $50k/month on ads, but I can't tell, which campaigns are actually driving sales"

✅ Define the Actionable Outcome:
Don't start to build before you have a clear goal in mind.
👉 What is the simplest, clearest decision or action that needs to be enabled?
➡️ "I need to see CPA by campaign side-by-side so I can cut the losers, if they fall under value X"

✅ Select the Minimalist Tool:
Only now, start to build something!
👉 What is simplest, most cost-effective setup to deliver that specific action?
➡️ Get campaign data via ETL-tool or scripts, build a simple SQL-pipeline with a cron job, pump it into something consumable for your end user (Excel, BI tool, etc.)

That's it.
That's how you build a fast MVP, which costs almost nothing.
And with this foundation you can iterate and scale up always later on.


What’s one business problem you solved recently where you intentionally chose a simple tool over a complex one? 👇 

-------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

Some people meditate.
I build pipelines.

There is a meditative quality to Data Engineering that I haven't found anywhere else.
It satisfies my deep need for organization.
Taking something messy and shaping it into a logical, reliable structure.

It’s like solving a massive puzzle.
Every piece has a place.
Every transformation has a reason (hopefully 😉).

Building pipelines also leads to another passion of mine: serving others.
I use my love for structure to make life easier for the people around me.
I take the complexity onto my plate so they don't have to deal with it.

It's the perfect synergy. 
Solving someone else's problem while satisfying my inner needs.
And that’s why I love what I’m doing each and every day! 


There's nothing quite like that feeling when your pipelines wrap up with a satisfying green checkmark, is there? 😉

-------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm Fabian👋
I write about building lean and cost-effective data systems on GCP
👉 Hit Follow
♻️ share the post with others
🤝 write me a message and connect with me

Anthony Alcaraz

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Driving growth in the startup ecosystem by leveraging AWS's cutting-edge AI/ML technologies. My team helps startups accelerate their go-to-market strategies and technological development.

Key focus areas:
- Developing AI/ML startups
- Guiding high-potential startups through AWS's AI/ML offerings
- Fostering partnerships within the EMEA tech community
- Aligning AWS's AI/ML solutions with startup needs

Passionate about empowering the next wave of AI-driven innovation. 

Let's connect and explore how AWS can supercharge your startup's AI/ML journey!

Senior AI/ML Strategist Startups & VC EMEA Strategic Pursuits

Fribl

Advisor

GenAI x HR 
Designed AI strategy
Lead engineering team 

With recruiting topping the list of concerns for many CEOs and companies spending upwards of $4,000 on average per hire, the need for innovation is clear. 

All too often, the arduous recruiting process leaves both employers and applicants frustrated after 42 days of effort with uncertainty if the right match was made...

At Fribl , we are leading the charge to transform this status quo, starting with reinventing the screening process using our proprietary GenAI technology enhanced by symbolic AI. 

This powerful combination doesn't just accelerate hiring, but actually personalizes the experience to precisely match candidates with roles that align to the company's unique culture - a monumental undertaking previously thought impossible.

As innovations like video interviews, CV parsers and AI recommendations shake up recruitment, we remain laser focused on four seismic shifts: Diversity, Advanced Interviewing, Data Analytics and AI Adoption. 

Our mission? To disrupt outdated screening tactics by simplifying the complex, multidimensional analysis of applicant credentials at scale to surface the ideal talents that personify an organization's ethos.

Chief AI/ML Product Officer & Partner

University of Oxford

Guest lecturer to Ajit Joakar Course : Artificial Intelligence: Generative AI, Cloud and MLOps (online)
Subject : the intersection of LLMs and graphs

AI/ML Guest Lecturer

Aldecis

My client portfolio was L’Oreal Finance Transformation 
AI for BI 

Management in AI Projects and Engineering Teams:
In my managerial role, I oversee AI projects and lead teams of engineers in crafting cutting-edge solutions. My focus is on driving strategic initiatives, ensuring projects are aligned with organizational goals, and fostering a culture of innovation and excellence. I take a hands-on approach to problem-solving and mentorship, ensuring that both projects and people reach their fullest potential.

Development in LLM/ML Ops:
My development expertise lies in the specialized domains of Large Language Models Operations (LLM Ops) and Machine Learning Operations (ML Ops). I am responsible for streamlining machine learning workflows from development to deployment. My work enables organizations to not only adopt but excel in leveraging machine learning technologies, facilitating continuous learning and adaptability across the board.

Marketing and Strategic Partnerships:
In the realm of marketing, I focus on building and nurturing strategic partnerships. My efforts are geared towards creating synergies with like-minded organizations and industry leaders. By forming valuable partnerships, I amplify brand visibility, foster innovation, and open doors to new business opportunities. The result is a win-win situation for all stakeholders involved, enhancing both market reach and impact.

Chief AI/ML Product Officer

CNAF

AI for performance management and customer support

I served as a Senior Executive after a competitive exam (EN3S). 
In this multifaceted role, I spearheaded a range of initiatives across key sectors such as Finance, Fraud Detection, Quality Control, Accounting, and Data & Performance Management.

Signature Project in ML Ops:
Facing the pervasive challenge of managing recurring incoming flows, I took the lead in conceptualizing and executing an avant-garde Proof of Concept (POC). This POC employed Azure ML-based ML Ops solutions, setting a precedent by being the organization's inaugural foray into Machine Learning Operations. The result was a transformative improvement in operational efficiency and service delivery.

Influence on Pluriannual Strategy 2023-2027 :
My pioneering project had a profound impact on the organization's multi-year strategic plan, specifically in the following domains:

Predictive Analytics: My efforts catalyzed the adoption of predictive analytics, enabling the organization to preemptively identify and mitigate challenges in benefits delivery. This proactive methodology revolutionized our service approach.

Sentiment Analysis: The launch of the "Lab Parentalité" was a critical milestone. Through the use of sentiment analysis, we gained unprecedented insights into parent feedback. This initiative not only enriched our data but also helped us better comprehend and meet the needs of parents.

Chatbots & Virtual Assistants: I played a key role in overhauling our customer service paradigm. By integrating cutting-edge chatbots and virtual assistants, we were able to enhance customer engagement across multiple platforms, including phone support, online portals, and mobile apps.

Personalization Algorithms: To elevate the user experience, we incorporated algorithms designed to customize services and recommendations. This bespoke approach significantly increased user satisfaction by tailoring the experience to individual preferences and needs.

Writes on ML/LLM Ops 🎨 | Follow me (4,8 K+) 🔔

As AWS's Senior AI/ML Strategist for EMEA Startups, I specialize in helping early-stage AI companies accelerate their development and go-to-market strategies. My expertise spans:

Technical Domains:
- Large Language Models (LLM) and GenAI architectures
- Knowledge Graphs and Vector Spaces
- MLOps and production AI systems
- Multi-agent and agentic AI systems

Strategic Value-Add:
- Technical due diligence for  AI investments
- Architecture optimization for AWS AI/ML services
- GTM strategy development for AI startups
- Deep expertise in evaluating GenAI applications

Recent Achievements:
- Guest lecturer at Oxford on LLMs and graph-based systems
- Led AI strategy for multiple venture-backed startups
- Published thought leadership on agentic AI systems
- Built and scaled ML platforms for enterprise clients

I'm passionate about helping VCs and founders navigate the technical and strategic challenges of building transformative AI companies. Happy to provide technical evaluation, architectural guidance, and strategic insights to help portfolio companies succeed.

Chief AI Officer & Decision scientist

Management in AI Projects and Engineering Teams:
In my managerial role, I oversee AI projects and lead teams of engineers in crafting cutting-edge solutions. My focus is on driving strategic initiatives, ensuring projects are aligned with organizational goals, and fostering a culture of innovation and excellence. I take a hands-on approach to problem-solving and mentorship, ensuring that both projects and people reach their fullest potential.

Development in LLM/ML Ops:
My development expertise lies in the specialized domains of Large Language Models Operations (LLM Ops) and Machine Learning Operations (ML Ops). I am responsible for streamlining machine learning workflows from development to deployment. My work enables organizations to not only adopt but excel in leveraging machine learning technologies, facilitating continuous learning and adaptability across the board.

Marketing and Strategic Partnerships:
In the realm of marketing, I focus on building and nurturing strategic partnerships. My efforts are geared towards creating synergies with like-minded organizations and industry leaders. By forming valuable partnerships, I amplify brand visibility, foster innovation, and open doors to new business opportunities. The result is a win-win situation for all stakeholders involved, enhancing both market reach and impact.

Your AI agents can't reason about what they can't structurally represent. ⭕ 

The gap between demos and deployable agents comes down to one thing: knowledge representation strategy.

Here's when knowledge graphs become non-negotiable for agentic systems:

🔗 Multi-hop inference is core to your reasoning tasks

Vector embeddings excel at semantic similarity but collapse on relationship queries. When your agent needs to traverse "Service → DEPENDS_ON → Database → PROTECTED_BY → SecurityGroup" to assess blast radius, you need graph topology. Property graphs give you O(1) relationship traversal. Document stores force you to reconstruct connections at query time.

⚡ You're hitting the relational complexity threshold

The 30-table heuristic is real. Beyond this, JOIN complexity explodes exponentially. More critically: when understanding connections requires traversing 3+ relationship types simultaneously, relational schema optimization becomes the bottleneck. Graph databases are optimized for exactly this access pattern.

🧠 Your agents must handle temporal reasoning and contradictory perspectives

Event-centric schema patterns capture causality. Multi-perspective patterns represent conflicting data sources with confidence scores and provenance. Try modeling "Terraform says X, AWS API says Y, confidence scores differ" in a relational schema without creating a maintenance nightmare.

🔄 Entity resolution across fragmented systems is blocking coherence

When the same entity appears as "Bob Jones" in CRM, "Robert Smith Jr" in fraud detection, and "R.J. Smith" in compliance, your agent needs evidence-based resolution using relationship patterns and contextual validation. Graph neighborhoods provide the evidence structure for identity inference.

⚙️ The three-graph architecture matters for production

Separate domain graph (trusted structured data), lexical graph (unstructured source text), and subject graph (LLM extractions). Entity resolution creates CORRESPONDS_TO edges between them. This prevents extraction artifacts from polluting canonical knowledge while maintaining full provenance.

❌ Skip graphs when:

Simple retrieval suffices, no multi-hop reasoning required, or relationship density is low. RAG with vector search handles these cases at 1/10th the infrastructure complexity.

The technical reality: RDF gives you formal reasoning semantics but slower performance. Property graphs give you traversal speed but require explicit inference logic. Hypergraphs handle n-ary relationships elegantly but lack mature tooling.

Choose based on your reasoning requirements, not architectural trends.

What's your biggest challenge in getting LLMs to reason over complex, interconnected enterprise data?

Senior AI/ML Strategist Startups @AWS | O’Reilly Author | Business Angel

Your LLM based agent can't reason about what it can't traverse. ❌ 

After analyzing production agentic systems at scale, I've identified why most AI agents fail: they're built on vector embeddings and relational schemas that fragment knowledge into isolated records.

The agents that actually work? They're built on graph-based knowledge models that encode relationships as first-class primitives.

🏗️ Architecture pattern that's winning: The three-graph model

Separate your knowledge graphs by epistemic confidence:

Domain Graph: Canonical entities post-entity-resolution. Stable identifiers, validated relationships, single source of truth.

Subject Graph: LLM extractions with explicit uncertainty. Confidence scores, model versions, extraction metadata preserved.

Lexical Graph: Original unstructured sources. Complete provenance, immutable text chunks, enables RAG retrieval.

The killer feature? CORRESPONDS_TO relationships link Subject → Domain only after entity resolution validates the match. Your agent knows what's certain vs. extracted.

⚙️ The technical tradeoff matrix I'm using:

Property Graphs (Neptune, Neo4j): Fast traversals, intuitive semantics, but inference requires explicit coding

RDF + OWL: Native reasoning via formal logic, but 3-5x performance hit and complexity overhead

Hypergraphs: Natural n-ary relations (prescription linking doctor, patient, medication, dosage simultaneously), but immature tooling

Most production systems? Hybrid LPG for performance + RDF layer for reasoning tasks.

🎯 Implementation pattern: Selective vectorization + ontology-driven traversal

Don't vectorize everything. Curate your vector search space:

Index: Service names, error signatures, entity anchors

Exclude: Full configs, log streams, operational noise

Vector search handles ambiguous queries. Ontological annotations drive precise graph traversal for contextualization.

Result: Semantic flexibility + structural reliability.

📐 Entity resolution is your foundation

Evidence-based matching with Jaro-Winkler similarity + context validation. Not LLM guessing.

Explainable: "92% match because name=87%, address=100%, phone=95%"

This generates the stable node identities everything else depends on.

The companies shipping reliable agents aren't prompt engineering harder. They're building knowledge architectures that make invalid reasoning paths literally untraversable.

AI agents are economically broken at scale without caching ❌ 

A single user goal triggers 5-10 LLM calls in loops. At 10K daily conversations, you're burning $547K/year on a single workflow pattern.

The obvious fix? Semantic caching with vector embeddings.

The problem? It fails catastrophically for agents.

🔴 Why Semantic Caching Breaks:

Agents execute context-dependent reasoning chains. Each step builds on previous steps.

"Analyze Tesla's Q3 performance" vs "Analyze Tesla's stock price"

Cosine distance: 0.28 → Cache hit 

Actual equivalence: False

Your agent retrieves a financial analysis plan when the user wanted technical specs. 

The entire workflow executes the wrong reasoning path.

Tune your threshold tighter → 5% hit rate (still burning $520K) Tune it looser → 65% hit rate but 40% false positives

The F1 optimization doesn't solve context drift.

🔧 The Architecture That Works:

Hybrid Cache = Vector Speed + Graph Intelligence

Layer 1: Vector DB for fuzzy matching (~30% of redundant queries) 

Layer 2: Knowledge Graph storing reasoning structures, not text
Explicit entity disambiguation (Apple fruit ≠ Apple stock)
Multi-hop traversal for validating context alignment 

Layer 3: Validation gate before serving cached plans

🎯 The Critical Shift: Granularity

Don't cache full responses. Cache atomic sub-queries.
"Compare platforms" decomposes into:
FetchFeatures(Platform A)
FetchPricing(Platform A)
FetchFeatures(Platform B)
CompareAttributes(A, B)

These canonical sub-tasks repeat at 40-70% rates vs 5-15% for full workflows.

The graph stores execution plan templates. 
Vector search finds intent. 

Graph traversal validates the reasoning path applies to current context.

📊 Production Results:

Hit rate: 65% (vs 8% with semantic-only)
Precision: 95% (vs 40% with loose thresholds)
Cost: $547K → $191K annually (65% reduction)
Latency: 60% faster (cold → hot state)

Graph adds 20ms per query, but prevents false positives that would cost 2000ms+ in LLM calls or failed workflows

The Mental Model:

Traditional cache: "Have I seen this text?" 
Semantic cache: "Have I seen something similar?" 
Agentic cache: "Do I know how to solve this class of problem?"

You're not storing what agents said. 
You're storing how agents think.

The cache evolves from a lookup table to a reasoning substrate, the agent's long-term memory of validated strategies.

Agentic needs graphs. 

At scale, the hybrid architecture : the difference between agents that burn capital and agents that generate ROI.

taplio

The Battle

Fabian Werkmeister

Anthony Alcaraz

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreFabian Werkmeister's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAnthony Alcaraz's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Fabian Werkmeister

Anthony Alcaraz

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Fabian Werkmeister's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAnthony Alcaraz's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreFabian Werkmeister's LinkedIn Performance