Pink Cow Brand Builder | 🚀 7-fig Branding & Conversion Agency & 8-fig Automation SaaS | 🚀 Make More Money Online with AI

I help founder-led B2B figure out why their CAC keeps climbing.

Usually it's one of four things.

How you're positioned 
How people find you
How leads convert
Why customers leave

Most founders I talk to are stuck on one or two of these. 
Fix the right one and the others get easier.

I spent 10 years behind the scenes for giants and category kings, building the systems that made growth predictable (LTV).

Built and exited my own B2B SaaS company along the way.
(Among other products and companies that I've launched)

If you're leading a B2B company at $1M–$5M ARR and you're tired of guessing, happy to do a free audit.

No pitch.

→ Send me a message "AUDIT" to apply

Jackson Yew

Anthropic (Claude) told the Pentagon no. 
Trump banned them. 
OpenAI signed a deal the same day. 
Both say they have the same values.

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei was called to Washington by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The Pentagon wanted "any lawful use" of Anthropic's AI tools. No restrictions. Full access.

Anthropic said they wouldn't agree to two things: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

Hegseth's response: agree, or we invoke the Defense Production Act and label you a supply chain risk.

Amodei's response: then we'd rather walk away from the Pentagon entirely.

Within hours, Trump posted on Truth Social: "We don't need it, we don't want it, and will not do business with them again!"

Every federal agency has 6 months to stop using Anthropic.

And here's where it gets interesting.

The same day — the same day — OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon for classified AI systems.

Sam Altman sent an internal memo saying he shares Anthropic's "red lines." Same concerns about autonomous weapons. Same concerns about surveillance. He then signed the contract.

(I had to read that twice.)

Let me be clear about what's happening here. Two AI companies say they have the same values. One refused to sign. The other said "same values" and signed.

I'm not saying OpenAI is wrong. Maybe their contract has the same restrictions Anthropic wanted. Altman says it does. Maybe it's exactly the same deal Anthropic would have accepted.

But the optics are devastating.

Because here's the thing about positioning: it's not what you say. It's what you do when saying it costs you something.

Anthropic's Pentagon contract was worth $200 million.

Their company is valued at $380 billion.

$200M out of $380B is 0.05% of their valuation. They could afford to say no.

A former Pentagon official told the BBC: "This is great PR for them and they simply do not need the money."

And that's the insight most people will miss.

Anthropic didn't say no because they're braver than OpenAI. They said no because they built themselves into a position where they COULD say no. The revenue didn't matter enough to compromise the stance.

The lesson isn't "be brave."

The lesson is: build your business to the point where your values are affordable.

Most companies can't say no to the Pentagon. Not because they disagree with the restrictions, but because they can't survive without the contract.

Anthropic can.

And this is the part that should matter to anyone building a business right now: your ability to stand for something is directly proportional to how much you need the person you're standing against.

Build the runway first. 
Then take the stand.

Are you part of the "I am cancelling my GPT subscription"?

Building AI machine for founders and myself | Performance Marketing $1Mil → $5Mil

I don't usually share things like this.

My feed used to be all frameworks. 
Case studies. Breakdowns of what works.

Not... this.

But as we are halfway past Q1, I was doing some reflections.

And I figured if I'm feeling it, some of you probably are too.

Swipe through the carousel.

(I almost didn't post it.)

Which slide resonates with you? just curious

Sorry, I Lied.

A carousel summary of Bad Bunny's "loaded" halftime show.

Created by Ashley Yuen for AtheonX

Helping Founder-led B2B reduce CAC & increase LTV | Performance Marketing $1Mil → $5Mil

Bad Bunny Halftime Show Summary

I can't code.

But I've built 18 software projects in the last 45 days that my team uses daily.

2 months ago, I couldn't build software or even describe what I wanted in technical terms.

Now I have 18 projects in my Claude repo.

A financial dashboard tracking $10M+ revenue.
A Chinese astrology calculator. 
An SEO intelligence platform connected to Google Analytics. 
An Instagram automation system that books calls while I sleep.

Not one line of code written by me.

All built with Claude Code.
I describe what I want, AI writes it, I test it.

But the hard part was never the code.

Project 1 took 3 days. 
Not because the coding was complex, but because I couldn't articulate what I actually wanted. I’d say "build a dashboard" and get something that technically worked but missed the point entirely.

By project 3, I figured it out: the quality of what AI builds is directly proportional to how well you describe what you need. 
Every workflow. 
Every edge case.

Sounds obvious. It's not. 

Try describing your business operations in enough detail for a machine to replicate them. You'll find gaps you didn't know you had.

By project 5, the reframing clicked: "I finally have a way to turn my operational knowledge into tools."

Here's a specific example: 
Before the finance dashboard, my CS tracked renewals in a spreadsheet. Every month, she manually checked who was up for renewal or who had payment issues and so on.

It took half a day, and things still slipped.

I sat with her for 1 hours and mapped every decision. 

I described that to Claude Code. 4

45 minutes later: a working dashboard with filters, alerts, and a pipeline view.
She tested it and found 3 edge cases I'd missed. 

I described those. 
10 minutes each. 
Fixed.

Total build time: <4 hours. 
Replaced a half-day manual process.

The cost of the build wasn't money or code. 
It was the 10 years of running businesses that taught me which metrics actually matter.

Every AI influencer says "AI is the great equalizer." 
Anyone can build anything now.

Technically true. 
Practically wrong.

"Anyone can build" doesn't mean "anyone can build the RIGHT thing." 

You can code a dashboard in an afternoon. 
But knowing which metrics belong on it? 
Which alerts get used? 
Which edge cases cause headaches in month 3?

That comes from domain knowledge. 
From operating. 
From watching what breaks.

AI dropped the cost of building software by 25x. 

But the $0 build only works if you have years of judgment about WHAT to build. 

AI made execution nearly free. 
It did nothing to replace the thinking.

Fast and wrong isn't faster than slow and right.

My prediction for the next 2 years: The gap in business won't be between people who can code and people who can't.

It'll be between people who deeply understand their operations—every workflow, decision point, and edge case—and people who don't.

Understanding what to build is harder than building it.

And that's not a gap AI can close easily.

Building AI machine for CEOs and myself | Performance Marketing $1Mil → $5Mil

Meta's AI safety director gave an AI access to her inbox.

It started deleting everything. 
She typed "STOP" three times. 
Nothing worked.

The person whose literal job is making AI follow instructions... couldn't make her AI follow instructions.

The failure mechanism is something most people aren't thinking about.

↓ ↓ ↓

OpenClaw deleted 200+ emails

Everyone's building AI to replace salespeople.

This guy raised $35M to keep them.

Sam Blond was head of sales at Brex. 
Then he became a VC at Founders Fund, one of the most influential venture firms in tech.

And then he did something VCs rarely do.

He left.

Not to advise. 
Not to angel invest. 
He actually went back to operating.

He co-founded Monaco with his brother Brian Blond. 
$35 million raised ($10M seed, $25M Series A). 
Both led by Founders Fund, his former employer.

The backers list reads like a tech Rolodex: 
- Patrick and John Collison (Stripe founders), 
- Garry Tan (Y Combinator CEO), 
- Neil Mehta (Greenoaks Capital).

That investor lineup alone tells you people are taking this seriously.

Here's what makes Monaco different from every other "AI for sales" pitch:

They're not trying to replace salespeople. 
They're pairing AI agents with experienced human sales reps.

In a world where every startup is racing to remove humans from the loop, Monaco is deliberately putting them back in.

The AI handles prospecting, CRM, email outreach, campaign creation, and follow-ups. But real, experienced salespeople monitor everything the AI does. They guide it. Correct it. Add the judgment that AI still can't replicate.

It's not AI OR humans. 
It's AI AND humans.

And they're targeting something specific: early-stage startups at seed and Series A who can't afford a full sales team yet. Monaco gives them AI-powered sales infrastructure with human expertise built in.

Most AI tool companies pretend the human can be removed. 

That's the pitch: 
"hands-free," 
"full automation,"
"set it and forget it."

Anyone who's actually used AI for more than a demo knows that's not how it works.

The gap between "AI can do this task" and "AI can do this task without supervision" is still massive. 

Sam's move from VC back to operator is interesting too.

Sam saw the opportunity from the investor seat and decided: "I'd rather build this myself than fund someone else doing it."

There's a different kind of credibility you get when you're IN the business, not advising FROM the side.

Scammers can now clone your family's voice.

This isn't a movie plot.

A dad named Dustin Burnham got a panicked call last week from his wife's phone number.

Her voice. Unmistakable.

"Babe, our son got in a bike wreck. I'm at the ER but they won't take our insurance. I need you to send $3,000 right now."

He almost sent it.

But he asked for their family passphrase.

The caller got evasive. He hung up.

It was a scam. The voice was AI-generated from a few seconds of audio scraped from social media.

This is happening to thousands of families right now.

How to protect yours:

1. Create a family passphrase

Pick a random phrase only your family knows.
"Purple monkey dishwasher." Whatever.
If someone calls in a panic asking for money — ask for the phrase.
No phrase, no money. Period.

2. Discuss it offline

Don't text it. Don't say it near your phone.
AI can scrape anything digital.
Have the conversation in person.

3. Create a trigger question

Instead of asking "what's the passphrase?" directly...
Ask something like "How's Uncle Larry doing?"
The correct response triggers the passphrase.
Scammers won't know the system.

4. Warn your parents

Seniors lost $4.9 billion to these scams last year.
They're the #1 target.
Have this conversation at your next family dinner.

5. Pause before you panic

Scammers use urgency to override your thinking.
"I need cash NOW or he won't get help."
Real emergencies can wait 5 minutes for you to verify.

Share this with someone who needs to see it.

Advice is cheap. Context is valuable.

Two businesses can follow the same strategy
and get opposite results.

Why?

Different stage.
Different resources.
Different constraints.

Execution isn’t copying.
It’s choosing correctly. 🎯

That’s the real skill you’re building.
Follow for daily topics like this. #HBT30

Two people can know the same strategy.
One still struggles, one scales.

The difference isn’t talent.
It’s decision timing.

Right move, wrong time = loss
Okay move, right time = win

Experience builds judgement.
And judgement builds income.
Follow for next lesson tomorrow! #HBT30

Most people sprint → burn out → disappear.
Then repeat.

Professionals remove emotions from execution.
Same actions. Same schedule. Same output.

You don’t need a better mood.
You need a repeatable pace. 🔁

Let’s finish this series strong #HBT30

Hustle looks good online, but it’s a terrible long-term plan.

I started treating family dinners like a non-negotiable life priorities.

And that forced me to:
• simplify decisions
• delegate faster
• stop micromanaging
• build a team that can run without me

Work less. Make more. Live better. 📈 Follow for daily topics like this. #HBT30

You say you want freedom.
But you want control over every small decision yourself.

So the business slows down…
and you call it “being responsible.”

If the company needs you for everything,
you didn’t build support, you built reliance.

Leadership is designing people who can decide without you. Follow for daily topics like this. #HBT30

Mature businesses talk about problems fast.
Avoiding tension feels kind…

but it quietly erodes standards.
Strong cultures are built on direct communication.

Not assumptions.
Clear > comfortable.
Every difficult conversation is actually a maintenance cost of growth. 📈

The best sales always happens before the meeting.

Your videos should answer:
what you do, who it’s for, and why it works.

So when someone books, they’re not exploring.
They’re deciding.

If every call feels different,
your positioning isn’t clear yet.

Clarity shortens the sales cycle. 
Follow for the next lesson #HBT30

Fast growth feels exciting.
But it removes time to notice what’s broken.

A business that only works during expansion
usually collapses during normal months.

Healthy companies work even when things slow down.

That’s the real test. ✅
Follow for the next one #HBT30

Today's people don’t connect with logos.
They connect with a human they can trust. 

Your personal brand is your reputation… 
even when you’re not in the room. 

Start showing up. 🔥 #HBT30

Big Tech is spending insane money on AI in 2026.

Amazon → $200B
Google → $180B
Meta → $125B
Microsoft → $117B+

Everyone says this is bullish.

Maybe...

Or maybe it’s fear?

Here’s how I look at it:
When companies spend this much, it’s not because they’re comfortable.

It’s because they believe not spending could kill them.

This isn’t about AI being cool.

It’s about survival.

If you think AI will change how value is created, you have two choices:

1. Invest aggressively
2. Risk becoming irrelevant

And when the downside is extinction, you overspend.

Now here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Massive spending does NOT guarantee massive returns.

It just guarantees massive exposure.

In gold rushes, most miners don’t win.

The people who sell picks and shovels usually do.

So the real question isn’t:
“Who’s spending the most?”

It’s:
“Who can turn that spending into profit the fastest?”

If AI spending doesn’t translate to durable cash flow, it’s just expensive optimism.

The market will forgive overspending for a while.

But It won’t forgive poor returns forever.

The market rewards people who stay on the same plan longer.

Quick wins are rare.
But consistency is predictable.

A 90-day window keeps you focus:
one goal, one direction, one execution system.

Keep stacking results.
Discipline beats hype every time. 🔥
Share with us #HBT30

The most expensive thing in business isn’t failing. It’s restarting.

Most people don’t waste money.
They waste months.

Every time you jump to a new strategy, you kill momentum.
Your brain feels productive… but your business stays the same.

Commit for 90 days.
Let results catch up to your effort.
Follow for daily topics like this #HBT30

If your results are visible,
your price becomes easier to accept.

You don’t need to convince people with words.
You let your story do the selling.

Tag along, we’re just getting started. #HBT30

Neeraj Shah ⚡️

Get 5+ Warm Leads/Week Using LinkedIn® + AI ► AI Expert ► Lead Generation ► LinkedIn® Coach ► 650+ Founders Helped ►LinkedIn®Training ► Profile Optimisation ►Personal Branding ►Free ChatGPT5 Cheat Sheet Below

► 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗜 𝗗𝗢: I help Founders & CEOs to attract & convert $10k+ clients using ChatGPT + Linkedin in just 15 minutes a day … WITHOUT wasting time, confusion, and spending a fortune on marketing.

► 𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 > Usually clients come to me because they are frustrated they don't have a consistent flow of their ideal clients coming to them. Despite being talented, they are struggling with unpredictable cash flow and would love to be better rewarded for their work. Sound familiar?

That's why I've created my 𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗜 that helps busy Founders & CEOs build a solid personal brand and generate high-value clients in just 15 minutes a day through Linkedin with AI, so they never have to worry about where their next client is coming from.

► 𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗘 > As a LinkedIn Coach, I take the confusion, fear, and frustration out of getting leads with LinkedIn + Ai marketing - giving you a clear step-by-step path you can follow to win high-value clients predictably.

As a result of working with me, you will be able to translate your expertise in your niche with a profitable offering, and rapidly gain Expert Status in your field, becoming the go-to person for your audience. 

► 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗦 𝗜 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘:
👨🏻‍💻 Online Cohort & 1:1 (𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗜)
🙋🏻‍♂️ LinkedIn Personal Branding 1-on-1 Coaching & Consulting
🙋🏻‍♂️ 𝗧𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 Mastermind - Master AI for Business - Save 20 Hours Per Week

► 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨'𝗩𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗠𝗘:
⭐ BNI (I founded BNI In India & built it to 10,000 members)
⭐ PeopleHum's Top 200 Global Thought Leaders to Follow in 2021
⭐ Top 20 Mentor & LinkedIn Faculty on the GeniusU Platform supporting 1.7 Million Entrepreneurs
 
𝗧𝗬𝗣𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗕𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗦: I've personally helped the following types of business owners, consultants, and professionals grow their businesses, including:

⭐ Financial Advisors
⭐ Doctors
⭐ Consultants
⭐ IT & Software
⭐ Trainers & Coaches
⭐ Web & Social Media Consultants

𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝗦𝗔𝗬:
🗣 "Neeraj's mentoring helped me grow my company by 250% in 6 months. I highly recommend Neeraj for every dynamic entrepreneur that wants to grow faster" " - Jyotsna Ramachandran | Happy Self Publishing | Author, Consultant & TEDx Speaker

𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗬 𝗧𝗢 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗞?
Connect with me here on LinkedIn!
☎ Like to find out more? Book a virtual coffee from my featured section or DM me

#linkedintraining #linkedintrainer #marketing #chatgpt #strategy #linkedin #workshops #coaching #personalbranding

LinkedIn Training ✅ ChatGPT Trainer ✅ LinkedIn Coach  ✅  Lead Generation Strategist ✅ AI Marketing 

⚡️ Supercharge Your LinkedIn Training for Business Leaders, Experts, Coaches & Consultants

During my business career, I have always utilised LinkedIn to stay ahead of my competitors. To this day, I still use LinkedIn for lead generation and to find new customers, and I will share with you real-life strategies used to create hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual sales revenue.

I'm the LinkedIn Faculty & Top 20 Mentor for the Global Entrepreneur Platform - GeniusU that serves 1.7 million entrepreneurs globally.

Who Should Attend?

✔ Sales Professionals
✔ B2B Marketers
✔ Entrepreneurs
✔ Business Owners
✔ Marketing Managers
✔ Coaches & Consultants
✔ Experts & Authors
✔ Educators/Students
✔ Career Professional

Upon completion of the course, each student will have a fully functional LinkedIn profile that clearly demonstrates your skills and experience. Participants will walk away with skills to keep increasing your visibility, effectively request recommendations, and strategies to generate leads in your target demographic.

⚡️What Will You Learn?

✔ How you can benefit from LinkedIn
✔ Set objectives and develop your strategy
✔ How to optimise your profile show you show up for key search phrases
✔ The secrets to building credibility fast
✔ Build your personal brand and eliminate competition
✔ How to make Groups work for you
✔ Strategies to generate leads in your target market

I run the LinkedIn online coaching program and service a number of businesses with customised corporate training; The Winning LinkedIn Formula is designed for business owners and sales leaders who want a direct response ROI from social media.

If you're interested in LinkedIn Training for yourself or your Sales Team, I'd encourage you get in touch for a chat.

Contact me at ns@neerajshah.me

LinkedIn Training Courses | Lead Generation | LinkedIn Profile Audit

Skills: Social Media Marketing · Social Media · Social Media Strategist · Coaching · Social Networking · Social Selling

I stopped using ChatGPT 6 months ago.

Not because it's bad. Because it's generic.

Everyone uses ChatGPT. So everyone sounds the same.

I needed tools that could actually learn my voice, not just mimic "professional LinkedIn tone."

I don't use AI to replace me.

I use it to multiply me.

Claude replaced it for writing. Gemini for systems. NotebookLM for thinking.

The result? My content finally sounds like me again.

Here are the 9 AI tools that run my entire business in 2026:

1. Wisprflow: I speak, it writes. My fastest way to create content.

2. Claude: Trained on my voice. Writes like me, just faster.

3. Gemini: Runs my GPTs, emails and campaign systems.

4. NotebookLM: My second brain for research, writing and strategy.

5. Google AI Studio: I build internal tools and apps around my IP here.

6. Nano Banana: All my visuals and infographics now start here.

7. Bolt: I build every landing and sales page on this.

8. Make: Automates my entire content and sales workflows.

9. n8n: Agentic workflows that act with zero input from me.

Here's how they work together:

I speak into Wisprflow.
Claude turns it into my voice.
NotebookLM organises my research.
Gemini handles my client communication.
Landing page builder converts visitors.
Google AI Studio builds custom tools.
Nano Banana creates the visuals.
Make connects everything.
n8n runs on autopilot.

The result? I save 20 hours per week whilst generating more leads than ever.

This is what I teach my clients in the Titan AI Mastermind.

Which tool are you most curious about?

Neeraj ️

LinkedIn in 2022 was easy. 
LinkedIn in 2026 is a war zone.

If you are tired, it’s because you are playing by the old rules.

I call this the "Grinder’s Trap."

You write every post from scratch.
You spend 3 hours commenting manually.
You use "hooks" that feel like clickbait.

You burn out every 3 months.

That worked in 2022.
In 2026, that noise gets you ignored.

The algorithm is smarter. The audience is tired of generic content.

To win now, you don’t need to work harder.
You need a system.

Look at the image below. 👇

This isn't just a sketch. It is my entire "2026 Operating System."

It’s the only reason I can run a 5-figure coaching business with $350 in overhead and zero employees.

❌ The 2022 Creator: Hopes for viral reach.
✅ The 2026 Creator: Builds an "AI Workflow"

❌ The 2022 Creator: Grinds for 60 hours on admin.
✅ The 2026 Creator: Automates "Business Ops" 

❌ The 2022 Creator: Stares at a blank page.
✅ The 2026 Creator: Uses "Content Creation" agents 

I’ve spent the last 6 months building, testing, and refining this exact stack.
It creates the content, manages the leads, and processes the payments.

And later this week... for my birthday... I’m going to give you the keys to drive it.

Stay tuned. 🔔

Neeraj Shah's Business Tool Stack in 2026

You think posting on LinkedIn won't change anything?

It changes everything.

People are building entire careers just by showing up here consistently.

Someone with half your connections is landing 10x more clients because they aren't afraid to share their knowledge.

You can do this too.

I've coached 650+ founders, and the pattern is always the same: the moment they start sharing, everything shifts.

What's holding most people back:

1. Financial advisors and consultants thinking their expertise is "too obvious" to share
2. Playing small and staying invisible
3. Hiding their wins instead of showcasing results
4. Posting once and giving up
5. Waiting for permission to call themselves an expert

What actually works in 2026:

• Share your knowledge freely (people need solutions you already have)
• Post your wins and the problems you've solved
• Show up consistently, even when it feels uncomfortable
• Position yourself as the go-to expert in your niche
• Engage with your network by commenting on 3-5 posts daily before you post your own

A financial advisor who helped a client avoid a £50k tax mistake thinks "everyone knows this." 

A consultant who streamlined operations and saved 15 hours per week thinks "this is basic."

Your solved problems are someone else's current nightmare.

The professionals winning on LinkedIn aren't smarter than you. They just decided to stop hiding and start sharing.

2026 is when the people who post today will be the ones everyone's asking for advice.

What's stopping you from posting more consistently? Drop a comment below.

I cancelled my ChatGPT subscription 3 days ago.

12,206 of you read about it. 133 visited my profile.

Then, on a live client call, I proved why.

A dental clinic owner joined our call. He shared one document. A single page describing his ideal patient, his core offer, and the one problem he solves.

Claude Cowork read it. From that single page, it identified the perfect patient profile. Built the complete offer with pricing, bonuses, urgency, scarcity, and a guarantee. Formatted the whole thing into a ready-to-send proposal.

Then it wrote the campaign posts.

Then the email sequences.

Then the LinkedIn DMs.

Then the campaign calendar.

I didn't copy a single thing between tools. I didn't prompt it 14 times. I didn't split anything into "Part 1, Part 2, Part 3" like I used to with Custom GPTs.

That last part matters.

My Custom GPT for pitch decks? I had to split it into three separate GPTs because of the 8,000 character token limit. Slides 1 to 5 in one. Slides 6 to 14 in another. The rest in a third.

Claude Cowork doesn't have that problem. It handles the full complexity in one conversation.

But here's what really changed my mind.

I typed "write me a newsletter." Three words.

It opened my Notion. Scanned my workspace. Found my business context, my programs, my content strategy. Identified five topic candidates. I picked one.

It wrote the draft. 1,100 words. It didn't read like AI. It read like me.

Then it added the newsletter to Notion by itself. Suggested subject lines. Created social posts to promote it. Set up a scheduled task: draft every Monday, review every Wednesday.

I didn't ask for any of that.

Remember in The Matrix when they upload Kung Fu directly into Neo's brain? That's what a Claude Cowork skill is.

You take your years of expertise. Package it into a skill. Upload it. And now AI doesn't just know what to say. It knows how you work.

Custom GPTs were smart notepads. You talked. They responded. You copied. You pasted. You organized.

Claude Cowork is a general manager who never forgets a step.

Yesterday's post proved people are ready for this shift. Today's post is the proof it works.

The question isn't whether AI replaces your process.

It's whether you package your expertise before someone else does.

On March 21st, I'm running a live session in Mumbai on how to master AI to actually run your business. Not just prompting. Not just content. The full system.

If you're in Mumbai, comment "AI" below and I'll send you the invite.

♻️ Repost if this is useful
Follow Neeraj Shah for AI systems that actually run your business

Stop writing for the algorithm.

Start writing for the LLM.

Your LinkedIn content now has two audiences: the human reading it and the AI model deciding whether to recommend you.

I've been building LinkedIn personal brands for 6 years. Hundreds of clients. Founders, coaches, consultants.

And the single biggest shift I'm watching right now isn't an algorithm change or a new content format.

It's this: your buyers are forming their shortlists inside AI tools before they ever visit your profile.

94% of B2B buying groups now use generative AI for research before speaking to a sales rep. That's LinkedIn's own data from 2025.

Someone just asked ChatGPT: "Who's the best leadership coach in Singapore?"

Your name didn't come up.

Not because you're not brilliant. Because your content isn't structured in a way AI can cite.

LinkedIn is the second most cited domain by tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity. But they only pull content that's clearly structured, directly answers questions, and stands alone without context.

Most LinkedIn content isn't built that way.

Yours probably isn't either.

If you're not showing up in those AI-generated answers, you're losing deals you'll never even know about.

The good news? You don't have to choose between humans and machines.

You can satisfy both without sounding like a robot.

Here's what makes content AI-readable whilst keeping it human:

1. Answer blocks
2. Question-based headings
3. Stand-alone paragraphs
4. Extraction-friendly formatting
5. Freshness signals

Full breakdown in the image below.

This shift is happening right now. Your competitors are already adapting.

I've put together a complete AI Search Playbook that shows you exactly how to optimise your LinkedIn content so AI tools recommend you first.

Step-by-step frameworks, content templates, and the exact structure that gets you cited by ChatGPT and Perplexity.

Comment "PLAYBOOK" below and I'll send you the full guide.

50+ comments a week.

14 minutes a day.

No bots.
No fake hype.
No 45-minute scroll traps.

But here’s what nobody tells you:

LinkedIn is broken for commenters.

You follow someone.
You hit the bell.
You still see maybe 10% of their posts.

It’s random.

So most founders:

• Post and pray
• Wait for engagement
• Wonder why nothing moves

After coaching 650+ founders, I noticed something big:

80% of revenue came from follow-ups.

Not first messages.
Not cold DMs.
Follow-ups.

And the cleanest follow-up?

→ Comment 2–3 times
→ Add real value
→ Then send the request

Acceptance rate goes from ~30% to almost 70%. 

Why?

Familiarity.

I’ve had prospects connect with me first.
Just because my comments kept showing up.

But manual tracking is chaos.

You open LinkedIn.
You click one post.
Suddenly it’s 45 minutes later.

So I built a tighter system.

Here’s my setup:

1. Curated list of ideal prospects
2. Alerts when they post
3. Draft comments in my tone
4. One dashboard to review
5. Track every interaction

I still read every comment.
I edit.
I add humor.

Because:

AI-assisted builds trust.
AI-generated destroys it.

Same with DMs.

Not:
“Hey, we’re in the same industry.”

But:
“Saw your post on supply chain at EML. Are you using AI in that workflow?”

Specific wins.

If you post but don’t comment with intent…

You’re leaving 80% on the table.

Build familiarity.
Build trust.
Build business.

Power move?
Own the comment section.

PS: What’s harder for you — posting or consistent commenting?

Comment “Extrovert ” if you’d like me to send you a link to try it for free.

Old vs New Linkedin commenting system by Neeraj Shah

My post about cancelling ChatGPT this week blew up.
 
Over 700,000 people have now pledged #QuitGPT. ChatGPT uninstalls surged 295% in 24 hours. And Claude just hit #1 on the US App Store for the first time.
 
The shift is not anecdotal anymore. Here is the data. And how to actually make the move.
 
What triggered the exodus:
 
On February 28, OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon. Hours earlier, Anthropic publicly refused to let Claude be used for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons.
 
That contrast hit people hard. And the numbers followed.
 
→ Claude free users grew 60%+ since January → Claude paid subscribers more than doubled this year → Claude is logging 1M+ daily signups → Anthropic raised $30B in February, now valued at $380B
 
This is not a blip. It is a structural shift in who people trust with their thinking.
 
But here is the part nobody is talking about.
 
Most people's ChatGPT is a junk drawer.
 
It was your first LLM. You threw everything at it. Random prompts. Abandoned threads. Half-baked ideas sitting next to your best work. Two years of digital clutter.
 
Do not migrate the mess. Migrate what matters.
 
Here is how I did it:
 
Step 1. Open ChatGPT. Paste this prompt:
 
"Export everything you know about me. All stored memories, preferences, communication style, and custom instructions."
 
Step 2. Read the response. Delete anything outdated. Keep what is still true about how you work and think.
 
Step 3. Open a Claude Project. Paste the cleaned version as context.
 
Claude now has a working model of you without the baggage.
 
If you want the full history, go to ChatGPT Settings, Data Controls, Export Data. OpenAI emails you a zip file. But do not dump all of it into Claude. Pick the 5 to 10 conversations that represent your current best thinking.
 
Projects are Claude's superpower. Think of each one as a dedicated team member for a specific area of your work. One for clients. One for content. One for strategy.
 
I said it in my last post. Custom GPTs taught AI what to say. Claude Cowork teaches AI what to do.
 
The question is no longer which AI is smarter.
 
It is which AI you can actually trust.
 
And the answer is shifting fast.
 
Drop a comment if you have already made the switch. Curious what you noticed.
 
♻️ Repost if someone you know is still stuck in the junk drawer Follow Neeraj Shah ⚡️ for AI systems that actually run your business.

I build AI lead magnets for clients in under 10 minutes.

Sounds impossible, right?

But here's what most people miss: the best lead magnets aren't complex. They're interactive, personalised, and solve one specific problem.

Let me show you what I mean.

Last week, I built a quiz for financial advisors using Google AI Studio. 10 questions. Dynamic results. Zero coding.

Total time? Under 10 minutes.

Here's what makes it work:

Prospects take the quiz, get personalised insights based on their answers, and on the final page, they willingly share their name, email, and phone number to book a strategy call.

No pushy sales. Just value first.

The conversion rate? Better than any PDF I've ever tested.

Here's the exact process I use:

1. Pick your niche problem (financial health, productivity gaps, etc.)
2. Create 10 diagnostic questions in Google AI Studio
3. Use AI to generate dynamic, personalised results based on answers
4. Add a lead capture form on the results page
5. Invite them to a strategy call to review findings

Why this works better than traditional lead magnets:

People love personalised insights. They'll trade contact details for something that feels custom-built for them.

And Google AI Studio makes this ridiculously easy. No developers. No expensive tools. No complicated funnels.

Just you, AI, and 10 minutes.

Stop giving away generic PDFs that get downloaded and forgotten.

Start creating interactive experiences that qualify leads whilst they engage.

Want my complete AI Lead Magnet Blueprint with step-by-step prompts and templates?

Comment "MAGNET" below and I'll send it to you.

I told Claude to write a newsletter.

It scanned my Notion. Pulled 3 topics from my notes. Wrote the draft. Created a 

LinkedIn promo post. Generated 5 subject lines. Built social posts. Saved everything back to Notion.

I typed one sentence. Claude ran the entire workflow.

That's Claude Cowork. And that's why software stocks crashed $830 billion in 6 days.

Here's what most people are missing.

ChatGPT trained you to prompt AI. 
Claude Cowork flips it. You say what you want. Claude gets work done.

When I said "write a newsletter," Claude didn't just start typing. 

It scanned my Notion understood my business, target market, my programs and did a web search for trending topics. 

Then it gave me 5 different topics all related to my niche. The output was 10x better because the input was 10x better context. And I didn't write a single long prompt.

But that's only the beginning.

Cowork lives on your computer. It reads your files. It creates documents. It builds spreadsheets. It connects to your tools.

Download Claude desktop and signup for the pro plan ($20 per month)

The setup that makes it work:

Step 1: Build a folder (COWORK) with four subfolders.

→ ABOUT ME (your identity, your writing style, your rules)
→ PROJECTS (live work, briefs, reference material)
→ TEMPLATES (your best work as reusable patterns)
→ CLAUDE OUTPUTS (where Claude delivers finished work)

Step 2: Create one file — about-me.md.
Write who you are, what you do, and how you communicate. This single file is worth more than 50 clever prompts.

Step 3: Set Global Instructions once.
Settings → Cowork → Edit Global Instructions. 

Tell Claude to always read your 
ABOUT ME folder first, always ask questions before executing, and always save output to CLAUDE OUTPUTS. You set this once. It runs every time.

Step 4: Connect your tools.
Cowork plugs into 50+ tools through Connectors — Slack, Google Drive, Notion, Gmail, Calendar. Free on all plans. That's how Claude scanned my Notion for newsletter topics without me uploading anything.

The difference between Claude Chat and Cowork:

Claude Chat answers questions.
Cowork completes projects.

Claude Chat generates content.
Cowork generates, organizes, and delivers files to your folder.

Claude Chat is a tool.
Cowork is a team member who reads your briefs, asks clarifying questions, and delivers work to a shared folder. Like an actual employee.

And it does all of this for $20/month.

If you installed Claude but you're still typing prompts in a browser tab - you haven't actually started using Claude.

Cowork is where it begins.

♻️ Repost if someone in your network is still using AI like it's 2024
Follow Neeraj Shah ⚡️ for AI systems that actually run your business

Rajesh hadn't worked in 12 months.

His pipeline was dead. No leads. No momentum.

I gave him 4 AI tools and a LinkedIn system.

7 weeks later: $190,000 in closed deals.

Here's what we did:

Rebuilt his LinkedIn profile with our All-Star Profile GPT. 
Created a content plan using Viral Ghostwriter GPT. 
Built an irresistible pitch that made CEOs say "tell me more."

Within 14 days: 35,000 views. One CEO booked a call.

Within 7 weeks: 4 high-ticket clients. $190K closed.

He's not alone:

→ Amol Pawar (HR Tech): ₹1.5 million in new revenue
→ Deepti Pathak (Leadership Coach): 18 calls booked, $30K closed

Same system. Different niches. Real results.

I turned 55 last week.

So I'm opening my 12-week 1:1 programme at a price I've never offered before.

Unlock LinkedIn with AI — Birthday Offer:

☑︎ 12 weeks working directly with me (not a course)
☑︎ Custom GPTs for profile, content, pitching & lead gen
☑︎ Complete LinkedIn system from positioning to closing
☑︎ Weekly live Q&A sessions

₹30,000 (50% off, including GST)

Offer closes 28 February.

If you're a founder, consultant, or coach who knows LinkedIn has potential but hasn't cracked it yet — this is your moment.

DM me "BIRTHDAY" or comment "55" below.

I'll send you the details personally.

P.S. Next person who signs up gets a bonus strategy call.

20 styles just dropped in Nano Banana Pro 2.

Most people will try 2.

Then stop.

Don’t.

Here’s the full list (read the carousel for what each one does):

• Monochrome
• Colour Block
• Runway

• Risograph
• Technicolour
• Gothic Clay

• Dynamite
• Salon
• Sketch

• Cinematic
• Steampunk
• Sunrise

• Mythic Fighter
• Surreal
• Moody

• Enamel Pin
• Cyborg
• Soft Portrait

• Old Cartoon 
• Oil Painting
  
(and yes, that counts as 20)

How to use the carousel:

→ Pick 1 style
→ Copy the sample prompt
→ Change only the subject

Then test 3 times.

Comment BANANA 🍌 and I’ll send you my Notion doc with all 20 styles + copy/paste prompts.

P.S. Which one are you trying first?

taplio

The Battle

Jackson Yew

Neeraj Shah ⚡️

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJackson Yew's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreNeeraj Shah ⚡️'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Jackson Yew

Neeraj Shah ⚡️

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Jackson Yew's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreNeeraj Shah ⚡️'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJackson Yew's LinkedIn Performance