VP Sales | 🚀 Propelling SaaS Companies to New Growth | Lifelong Sales Mentor and Teacher

Education is locked in outdated models while technology races ahead. So I bridge the gap and build the frameworks that define the future of learning.

I’ve spent my career moving between classrooms, boardrooms, and uncomfortable conversations about what actually works in education.

I started as a teacher.
Then, I moved into EdTech sales—helping founders, school leaders, and teams scale products, revenue, and strategy in one of the hardest markets there is.

Along the way, I noticed a pattern most of us avoid naming:

Education doesn’t fail because of a lack of tools.
It fails when motivation disappears—and we keep building systems that ignore that.

We’ve tried dashboards.
We’ve tried content engines.
We’ve tried accountability without agency.

And we keep acting surprised when students disengage.

My work now sits at the intersection of:
•	Learning science & motivation
•	AI-enabled mastery-based learning
•	Go-to-market strategy for education companies
•	Helping schools raise standards without burning people out

I’m especially interested in models where:
• students love school
• learning is deep, fast, and human
• technology gives time back instead of taking it
• and schools can actually sustain themselves

I advise founders, operators, and education leaders who want outcomes—not applause.

I’m the author of The Great Unlock—a practical, contrarian look at how AI can break education’s three biggest constraints and make learning more human, not less.

No hype.
No grownsplaining.
High standards. High support.

If you believe students are capable of more—and that education should finally be built around that belief—we’ll get along just fine.

Karim Kuperhause

This is how some AI-in-education influencers sound to actual teachers.

When they claim “teaching jobs are over” because an AI tutor can generate a worksheet or explain long division.

The bread-machine analogy fits uncomfortably well.

Yes, the machine automates one specific task.
Yes, it can produce a decent loaf with very little effort.

No, it doesn’t replace understanding students, diagnosing misconceptions, building trust, managing a room of 25 wildly different humans, motivating disengaged kids, adapting in real time, or designing learning experiences that actually stick.

That’s what bakers do.
That’s what teachers do.

But when AI handles part of the work, everyone panics:

→ This changes everything!
→ Teachers are obsolete!
→ Schools won’t exist in 2 years!

Meanwhile, teachers are already using these tools daily.

They’re realizing something much less dramatic — and much more interesting:

The mechanical parts of the job are shrinking.
The human parts just became more important.

AI doesn’t replace teachers.
It exposes what teaching was never about in the first place.

♻️ Repost if this resonates
🔔 Follow for grounded takes on AI & education
🍞 Still waiting for a bread machine that can run a classroom on a Friday afternoon

——————

I curate the future of learning | Helping EdTech founders and Education Leaders co-design the future of learning

This chart should make every education leader pause.

The strongest predictor of higher adult income isn’t test scores.
It’s character skills.

The graph below (from Adam Grant's Hidden Potential) shows that 4th-grade behaviour ratings are a remarkably strong predictor of adult earnings.
Translation: traits like self-control, perseverance, responsibility, and cooperation compound for decades.

This is where it gets interesting 👇
Those skills are supposed to be taught in kindergarten.

Which is why one of the most powerful (and underappreciated) predictors of long-term student success is a seasoned kindergarten teacher. Not because they teach reading better—but because they teach being human better.

Now enter AI.

I often write about how AI can “give teachers time back.”
Cool. But time back for what?

❌ More test prep
❌ More dashboards
❌ More compliance tasks in disguise

The real unlock is this:

AI should buy teachers time to do the things only humans can do:
• Build character
• Scaffold self-regulation
• Teach conflict, empathy, grit, and follow-through
• Create environments where habits—not just knowledge—are formed

If we use AI to optimize instruction but ignore character, we’ll get faster learning… and the same outcomes.

If we use AI to protect time for character and life skills, we change trajectories.

The future of education isn’t less human.
It’s human skills, finally given the time they deserve.

The question isn’t whether AI gives teachers time back.
It’s whether we’re brave enough to use that time wisely.

No alternative text description for this image

Over 80,000 teacher applications.

Let that sink in.

Alpha School received more applications than most entire school districts see in years. Many big districts would be thrilled with a fraction of that.

This isn’t a fluke.
And it’s not a labor market anomaly.

It’s a signal. 🚨

Because here’s the real takeaway:

The teaching profession isn’t dying.
What’s dying is the traditional teaching model.

Teachers aren’t burned out on:
--> kids
--> learning
--> purpose
--> impact

They’re burned out on:
- being asked to do everything except teach
- rigid pacing guides that ignore mastery
- classrooms optimized for compliance, not learning
- systems that confuse time-on-task with outcomes

When a school redesigns the job:
--> clear outcomes
--> everage (yes, including AI)
--> smaller cognitive load
--> real autonomy
--> respect for professional judgment

Teachers don’t leave.

They line up.

80,000 applications isn’t about Alpha specifically.
It’s about pent-up demand from educators who still love teaching...
...but no longer want to sacrifice their sanity to do it.

The narrative that “no one wants to teach anymore” is lazy.

A better one is this:

Teachers want to teach. They just don’t want to teach in a broken system.

Fix the system, and the talent floodgates open.

Funny how that works.


________________________

undefined undefined

The Great Unlock

Get a preview of my upcoming book at https://thegreatunlock.com/

AI SHOW @ ASU+GSV 2025 Attendee

HierSales is about providing a hierarchy in your sales process. Putting systems in place to consistently grow revenue. We put in place scalable and repeatable sales processes to drive revenue growth for companies in the $1-5M stage.

Most companies are still running outdated GTM playbooks.

Big budgets go into ads, MQLs, and funnels that don’t actually build trust or drive outcomes.

That’s where HierSales comes in.

I help founders and revenue leaders invent their own growth playbook instead of borrowing someone else’s. My methodology is simple but powerful:

Identify → Amplify → Multiply

•	Identify the sparks already driving traction — peer influence, referrals, customer wins.

•	Amplify them through customer champions and authentic founder-led storytelling.

•	Multiply by turning those sparks into repeatable, scalable growth motions (councils, referral loops, influence dinners).

With HierSales, I work hands-on with early-stage and scaling companies to:

•	Run growth ethnography that uncovers where influence really flows.

•	Design influence programs that turn customers into your best sellers.

•	Build 12-week experiment roadmaps to test, validate, and double down on what actually works.

•	Codify it all into a playbook that accelerates growth sustainably.

I don’t just consult from the sidelines. I’ve built, scaled, and sold in the trenches — from teaching in classrooms to leading enterprise sales to scaling EdTech ventures. That practitioner’s lens means I can spot the hidden levers most consultants miss.

If your growth engine feels stuck, or if you’re tired of burning budget on campaigns that don’t convert, let’s talk. Together, we’ll write the playbook that finally unlocks your next stage of growth.

Founder/Fractional VP Sales

“Transform the education of tomorrow, today.”

Provide strategic direction for the Trafalgar-McGill CoLab: https://www.trafalgar.qc.ca/community/colab

Board Member

"I wish you to gasp not only at what you read but at the miracle of its being readable.' - Vladimir Nabokov

The education system is in crisis. Too many students are reaching grade 4 not able to proficiently read at level. This can't go on - children deserve to read and Hoot Reading is on a mission to help every child become a reader.

VP of Growth

“Systems streamline success; they eliminate the need to reinvent the wheel every time.” - J.R. Rim

commonsku is a SaaS platform that enables promotional products distributors to automate and streamline their processes in order to grow and scale their business, including their e-com.

Built entire sales team and sales processes from scratch and went on to Increase client base from 600 to 800 companies propelling transactional revenue from $1B to nearly $2B in 18 months.

VP of Sales

“An organization‘a ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.” - Jack Welsh

Clevr helps school districts consolidate and centralize manual forms and workflows into one clevr platform.

Developed and executed go-to-market strategy for landing and expanding into the US K-12 market. Landed in 7 US states and expanded market share which resulted in 45% year-over-year growth as well as landing the biggest client in company's history.

Director of Sales

“Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things.” - Peter Drucker

Driving efficiency and transformation while reducing the cost of compliance for public sector organizations by providing the Laserfiche Enterprise Content Management platform.

Introduced Laserfiche's digital transformation suite of solutions in new verticals including K12, NGOs and banks. Continued expansion into municipals, hotels and retail. Together, these resulted in a double of revenue year-over-year.

Director, Business Development

“People buy from people they trust”

Help school districts increase student growth by better managing K12 talent through focused talent management software.

Landed and expanded new SaaS solutions into the Canadian K12 market while building out a dedicated sales team and process for Canada.

Account Executive - People Admin

“Systems thinking allows us to see the consequences of our decisions before we make them.”  - Peter Senge

Harnessing the power of research to inform data-driven hiring and increase student achievement. Hit President's Club year-over year as well as becoming the recipient of the Pinnacle Award for highest sales achievement and the Rainmaker award for closing the biggest deals in company history.

Sales Manager - TeacherMatch

“Putting the right people in the right seats is the first step to creating an effective system.” - Jim Collins

Strategically work with school districts from coast to coast to help minimize lost learning days by addressing teacher absenteeism and professional development through the SmartFindExpress software platform. Hit President's Club on my first year and subsequent years thereafter. Landed biggest deal in company history for Canada, locked up the Ontario market and landed and expanded into the Quebec market.

Regional Sales Manager (Canada) - eSchool Solutions

“Building a business is about creating a system that can run and grow without you.” - Robert Kiyosaki

Founder and CEO of the Learning Box which was dedicated to ensuring school success for students in K-12.  Providing individualized instruction based on skill based learning for all core subjects. Went to oversee programs in over 32 schools, 3 learning centres and service thousands of students.

Founder/CEO

“Great leaders understand the importance of developing systems that outlive them.” - John C. Maxwell

As an elementary school teacher for 12 years in this school board, I worked with students from K-6.  I was a lead teacher for school reform and a trained SmartBoard Instructor as well as First Steps Instructor.  My students consistently scored in the top percentile across the entire school board in both math and English language arts.

It's also where I learned many of the skills that made me an exeptional sales professional because teaching and sales are two sides of the same coin.

Elementary Teacher

From ABC to ARR | K12 Education Top Voice | Outcomes. Or. Nothing.

podcasts.apple.com

Future of Education Podcast

We have 17 versions of an iPhone in 17 years, and we're still using the same version of education we've used for a hundred years.

Think about that for a second.

We upgrade our phones every year because:
• they get faster
• they get smarter
• they adapt to how we use them

But when it comes to kids?

Same time-based system.
Same age-based grades.
Same “move on even if you didn’t get it” logic.

Version 1.0.
Still shipping.

And then we act surprised when students are disengaged, anxious, or bored.

Here’s the uncomfortable part (said gently, I promise):
Education didn’t stagnate because we lack effort or care.
It stagnated because the system was never designed to upgrade.

The factory model worked when:
• information was scarce
• customization was impossible
• scale mattered more than outcomes

None of that is true anymore.

We now live in a world where:
• mastery can be personalized
• feedback can be instant
• pace can adapt to the learner

In every industry except education, that combination would trigger a total redesign.

This isn’t about blaming teachers.
Or dunking on schools.
Or chasing shiny AI objects.

It’s about finally admitting this:

If we wouldn’t accept a 100-year-old phone,
why are we forcing kids to use a 100-year-old learning system?

Education doesn’t need a patch.
It needs a version upgrade.

And the kids are more than ready for v2.0. 🚀

What if school worked like a video game

Kids want to do hard things.

Not busywork things.
Not checked-the-box things.
Hard things — with someone in their corner.

We understand this instinctively in sports.

We sign kids up for hockey, soccer, gymnastics, football, track.
We expect:
• missed shots
• lost games
• bad races
• frustration
• tears

And we’re... fine with it.

Why?

Because we believe something important:
Failure + coaching + repetition = growth.

Now switch to academics.

A bad math test?
Concern.

Struggling to read?
Intervention.

Falling behind?
Lower the bar. Modify the standard. Reduce the expectation.

Same kid.
Same brain.
Totally different rulebook.

Why the double standard?

In sports, we start with high standards and add support.
In school, we often start with comfort and subtract challenge.

But kids don’t rise to comfort.
They rise to standards — when they’re paired with belief and coaching.

The sports playbook works because it’s simple:
• Clear goals
• Immediate feedback
• Permission to fail
• Relentless practice
• A coach who says: “I know you can do this. Let’s try again.”

If we truly want kids to excel academically, we don’t need a new philosophy.

We need the same one we already trust — just applied to learning.

High standards.
Real support.
Try again.

That’s not pressure.
That’s respect.

Being cautious about AI doesn’t make a leader anti-innovation.

It makes them responsible.

The leaders I trust most aren’t asking,
“How fast can we adopt this?”

They’re asking,
“Who might this unintentionally harm?”

Much of this reflection shaped The Great Unlock — not as a playbook, but as a reminder:

Progress without trust isn’t progress at all.

Most schools are still training managers.

Kids who are taught to:
• follow instructions
• optimize within fixed systems
• wait for permission
• “do the work” exactly as assigned

That model worked when value came from compliance.

It breaks in a world where tools can do the compliance faster than any human ever could.

The real skill gap isn’t “AI literacy.”

It’s pattern literacy.

The people who win next don’t just use tools.
They:
• recognize patterns (What’s repeating? What’s breaking?)
• combine patterns (Across subjects, domains, problems)
• create new patterns that produce value

That’s what creators do.

They don’t manage circumstances.
They shape them.

This is the shift education needs to make:

❌ Teaching students to manage tasks
✅ Teaching students to spot leverage

❌ Teaching fixed answers
✅ Teaching how answers are generated

❌ Teaching “follow the system”
✅ Teaching “design the system”

When students learn how patterns work:
• math stops being about procedures
• writing stops being about formats
• science stops being about memorization

Everything becomes transferable.

And transferable skills are the only ones that survive accelerating tools like AI.

What does this all man?

It means fewer worksheets.
Fewer rubrics that pretend to be objective.
More open-ended problems.
More ambiguity.
More creation.

Which is exactly why it works.

Because the future doesn’t reward people who manage the past.

It rewards people who can see what’s forming—and build on it.

_______________________

https://lnkd.in/epZ_5Z-K

_______________________

The moment I realized AI leadership had nothing to do with technology was when a teacher said:

“I’m not scared of learning new tools. I’m scared of not being needed anymore.”

That’s not a technical concern.
That’s a human one.

Leaders who get AI right will be remembered not for moving fast —

but for protecting the people who make learning possible.

The best way to start with AI in schools is by giving time back to students.

Not by automating instruction.
Not by speeding up curriculum.

But by removing the tasks that quietly pull adults away from relationships.

When AI helps with planning, documentation, or communication, something important happens:

teachers get more time to notice
more time to listen
more time to respond

If AI doesn’t create more space for human connection, it’s not helping learning.

The right starting point isn’t efficiency.

It’s presence.

Where AI belongs in schools is actually very narrow.

It belongs anywhere it quietly gives students more time with adults who know them.

It does not belong:

- between teachers and students
- inside evaluation
- in places where trust is still fragile

Clear placement matters.

When leaders are precise about where AI fits, fear doesn’t have to fill the gaps.

One AI boundary every school system should state clearly:

AI will not replace professional judgment.

Teachers make decisions in context — with students, relationships, and lived experience in mind.

AI can assist.
It can suggest.
It can organize.

But it cannot replace human judgment.

When leaders say this out loud, fear lowers.

Boundaries don’t slow progress.
They make it safe.

There are parts of teaching AI will never replace.

Not because the technology isn’t powerful —
but because the work is human.

Noticing when a student’s behavior changes.
Adjusting in real time when a lesson isn’t landing.
Building trust that makes learning possible.

Any AI strategy that doesn’t explicitly protect these parts of teaching is missing the point.

The goal isn’t smarter systems.
It’s more human classrooms.

I read through 20 district "AI Policy" documents over the holidays.

Most of them are identical. They focus entirely on detection. They assume:

If we block ChatGPT, students will write.
If we use AI detectors, we preserve integrity.

But when I spoke to the teachers in those districts this month, I heard a different story. The detectors are flagging their best writers (false positives). The blocks are pushing kids to use AI on their phones, off the network, where no one can guide them.

We are trying to solve a motivation problem with a firewall solution. Students don't cheat because technology exists. They cheat because they don't see the value in the struggle of writing.

We are spending millions on "AI Guardrails." We should be spending that on "AI Agency." Teaching students why their voice matters more than the algorithm's output.

If your product is designed to catch students, you're fighting a losing war.
If your product is designed to make students want to think, you win.

No login. No rostering. No privacy issues.

If I pitched you a new EdTech platform today, your CTO would immediately ask:
"Does it integrate with Clever?"
"Is it COPPA compliant?"
"Where is the data hosted?"
"How long will the implementation take?"

We have let the "Business of School" strangle the "Business of Learning."

The Myth: Educational software requires complex identity management and strict 1:1 device ratios to function.

The Reality: The OneTab proves you can strip away the entire administrative layer and get better results.

Because the device relies on real-time adaptive assessment rather than stored user profiles, it creates a massive operational unlock:

Zero Setup: You don't spend September uploading CSV files of student rosters. You open the box and hand it to a child.

No Data Liability: It doesn't know the student's name, age, or address. There is nothing to steal. The PII risk is zero.

True Scalability: You don't need a device for every child. You can have a class of 30 share 10 tablets. The software adapts instantly to whoever is holding it.

We are currently paralyzing our schools with "Implementation Fatigue." Teachers spend more time managing logins than managing literacy.

While North American districts are drowning in dashboard management, this solution is delivering high-dosage tutoring without a single password reset ticket.

Sometimes, the most "advanced" technology is the one that knows when to get out of the way.

onebillion.org

one app that delivers reading, writing and numeracy

AI isn’t cheating.
It’s a superpower.

For most of school history, learning has had a hidden bottleneck: waiting.

Waiting for the teacher to get to you.
Waiting days (or weeks) for an assignment to be graded.
Waiting for the next explanation, the next note, the next permission slip to move on.

And if you got stuck?
You stayed stuck. Politely. Quietly. Until help arrived.

AI breaks that model.

With AI:

You don’t wait to get unstuck — you ask.

You don’t wait for feedback — you iterate.

You don’t wait for permission — you proceed.

Go fast.
Go slow.
Go sideways if that’s what understanding requires.

That’s the real shift: agency.

AI gives students control over:

when they practice

how they get feedback

how many reps they need

how deep they want to go

Not by replacing teachers — but by removing friction.

Teachers stop being human traffic lights.
Students stop being passengers.

This is why AI isn’t about automation.
It’s about momentum.

The most powerful learning moment isn’t when someone explains something to you.

It’s the moment you realize:
“I don’t have to wait anymore.”

That’s not just a productivity gain.
That’s a mindset shift.

And once students experience agency...
they don’t want school to go back to waiting.

One simple test for any AI use in schools:

Does this give students more time with a caring adult?

If the answer is no, pause.

The most responsible uses of AI aren’t flashy.

They quietly remove the work that pulls teachers away from:

noticing who’s struggling

responding in the moment

building trust that makes learning possible

When AI gives time back to students, teachers don’t become less important.

They become more present.

That’s the kind of progress worth protecting.

If teachers ever feel replaceable, AI has already failed.

Not because the technology is dangerous —
but because leadership lost its anchor.

Teaching is not a set of outputs.
It’s judgment, care, and trust in real time.

AI should make those things more visible, not less.

Any strategy that forgets this will struggle — no matter how sophisticated it looks on paper.

One reason AI conversations go sideways in schools:

Leaders borrow language from vendors.

“Scale.”
“Optimization.”
“Efficiency.”

None of those words describe why people became educators.

Try this instead:

“This should help us be more present with students.”
“This should protect professional judgment.”
“This should reduce unnecessary load.”

Language signals intent long before strategy does.

Language matters more than leaders realize.

❌ “AI will help us be more efficient.”

✅ “AI should give teachers more time to focus on students.”

❌ “This will modernize instruction.”

✅ “This should reduce workload, not increase pressure.”

The words we choose signal intent.

And right now, teachers aren’t listening for innovation —
they’re listening for reassurance.

A teacher once asked me:

“Is AI coming for my job?”

The most effective response wasn’t technical.

It was human:

“No. And if it ever feels like it is, we’re doing something wrong.”

That sentence doesn’t solve everything —
but it signals intent.

And in moments of uncertainty, intent matters more than explanations.

Joel Brody

Ethical Recruitment Leader | Mid to executive-level placement | Helping Qualified Candidates Grow Their Careers by Matching Them with Thriving Companies

Six months. That’s how long a construction firm searched for their next Director of Operations.

Hundreds of resumes. Dozens of interviews. Zero results.

When the CEO finally called me, he was exhausted. The business was growing, but without the right leader in place, he was stuck in the weeds, running operations himself instead of focusing on scaling the company.

Here’s what happened next: I clarified the role, tapped into my hidden network, and within six weeks placed the leader they’d been chasing for half a year. That hire streamlined operations, stabilized the team, and gave the CEO his time back.

This is what I do.
I help mid-market and growth-stage businesses—in construction, real estate, healthcare, and e-commerce—find the executives and senior managers who can turn chaos into clarity and growth into something sustainable.

Not by flooding inboxes with résumés.
Not by recycling candidates who happen to be “looking.”
But through our Right-Fit Recruiting Method™️: deep discovery, targeted headhunting, and cultural alignment that ensures leaders don’t just stick, they scale with you.

Here’s why clients come back:

8 years recruiting across industries that don’t tolerate mistakes

92% retention rate at the 12-month mark for senior hires

A reputation as a trusted advisor to CEOs and founders who are serious about growth

One client put it best:
“Joel didn’t just send resumes, he delivered the leader we’d been searching for. His process saved us months of wasted time and gave us the confidence to scale.”

At the end of the day, I’m not just a recruiter. I’m a headhunter.
I don’t stop until the right leader is in the seat.
I don’t just fill roles, I help companies build futures.

Outside of work, you’ll find me with my family and involved in my community. That same people-first mindset drives everything I do: relationships first, results always.

Looking to make your next senior hire the right one? Let’s talk about how we can find your perfect fit.

Executive Level Recruiter

Sometimes the candidate who feels like the perfect “cultural fit”…
is the one who ends up causing the most damage.

Here’s the story.

A company once interviewed a candidate — let’s call her Esther.
Charming.
Warm.
Polished.
Instant connection with the team.

After the interview, every manager said the same thing:
“She’s exactly like us. She’ll fit right in.”

And that was the problem.

She fit too well.
Same communication style.
Same conflict avoidance.
Same habit of staying “busy” instead of prioritizing impact.

But because she made everyone comfortable, nobody questioned it.
They hired her in a heartbeat.

Meanwhile, the other candidate — Moshe — challenged their assumptions, showed gaps in their workflow, and asked uncomfortable questions.
They rejected him for being “not a fit.”

Fast-forward six months.

The team was stuck in the same cycles.
Deadlines slipping.
Accountability unclear.
No one pushing the pace or raising the bar.

And here’s the twist:
Esther hadn’t done anything wrong.
She simply reinforced what was already broken.

Because “fit” doesn’t fix culture.
It repeats culture.

When the company called me back, they said something I’ll never forget:
“We hired the person who felt easy… not the person who would have made us better.”

That’s when it landed for them —
Cultural fit isn’t about comfort.
It’s about evolution.

And at Mai Placement, this is why we don’t chase “fit.”
We chase alignment with the future state of the business —
not the familiar patterns that keep companies stuck.

The hire who feels comfortable today
might be the one who caps your growth tomorrow.

The hire who stretches you
is usually the one who takes you where you’re trying to go.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

By the time you fire someone “for performance,”
the damage is usually already done.

I’ve seen this play out too many times at Mai Placement to ignore it.

Leaders hide behind labels like performance, culture, or office politics
when the real issue was never addressed early, clearly, or with respect.

So instead of honest conversations,
pressure builds.
Tension rises.
The environment turns toxic.

And eventually, the employee is pushed out —
not coached,
not supported,
not given clarity.

Here’s the part most leaders underestimate:
That person will move on.

In a few months, they’ll land somewhere healthier.
They’ll rebuild confidence.
They’ll do good work again.

But they will never forget how they were treated.

They’ll remember the raised voices.
The public embarrassment.
The silence when they asked for guidance.
The moments where ego replaced empathy.

A toxic environment doesn’t just hurt feelings.
It kills trust.
It drains productivity.
It turns capable people into survivors who are just trying to get through the day.

And even if they never say a word about it publicly,
they carry it with them.

Leadership power doesn’t come with a license to strip someone of dignity.
And performance management without humanity isn’t leadership —
it’s avoidance with authority.

At Mai Placement, we believe how you exit people
says just as much about your culture
as how you hire them.

Because reputations aren’t built in the wins.
They’re built in the hard moments leaders would rather rush through.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

It always makes me smile when someone messages me saying,
“I know that post was about me… just wanted to explain.”

Here’s the reality:
If I ever reference a situation, it’s almost never recent.
Details are changed, timelines are blurred, and identities are unrecognizable.

Because the point isn’t the person.
It’s the pattern.

After years inside hiring rooms, leadership meetings, and candidate conversations at Mai Placement, one thing has become obvious:

The same behaviors repeat everywhere.
The same blind spots.
The same leadership mistakes.
The same hiring lessons.

Different people.
Different companies.
Same themes.

So if a post hits close to home, it’s not because I wrote about you.
It’s because the experience is universal.

Business has patterns.
Leadership has patterns.
Human behavior has patterns.

And my goal isn’t to call anyone out —
it’s to reflect the real, messy, predictable dynamics we all navigate.

Because when something feels “too accurate”…
that’s not exposure.
That’s recognition.
That’s truth doing what truth always does:
It shows you a mirror.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

Sometimes the interview doesn’t expose the candidate.
It exposes the company.

Here’s the story.

A client brought us a strong candidate — we’ll call him Moshe — for a leadership role.
Experienced.
Grounded.
Clear communicator.
Exactly the kind of operator who moves organizations forward.

He walks into the interview… and within 30 minutes, the truth shows up.

Not about him.
About them.

Three leaders in the room.
All talking over each other.
Contradicting priorities.
No unified vision.
No clear answer to his simplest question:
“What does success look like in this role?”

And when Moshe politely pushed for clarity, one of the leaders snapped:
“We need someone who just gets it without asking so many questions.”

There it was.
The mask dropped.

This wasn’t a talent issue.
This was a culture issue.

A culture that avoided clarity.
A culture that punished accountability.
A culture where asking for direction was seen as confrontation.

After the interview, the company said:
“We’re not sure he’s a cultural fit.”

But the truth was the opposite.
He didn’t match their dysfunction —
and that’s exactly why they needed someone like him.

At Mai Placement, we’ve seen this again and again:
The interview isn’t just an evaluation of the candidate.
It’s a mirror for leadership.

And when a culture is shaky, unclear, or divided —
a great candidate will feel it instantly.

The question isn’t
“Is the candidate right for us?”
It’s also
“Are we a place where great talent can actually succeed?”

Because the strongest candidates aren’t scared of big roles.
They’re scared of environments where success is impossible.

If your culture can’t pass the interview…
your hiring problem isn’t the pipeline —
it’s the reflection.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

Sometimes the biggest red flag in a hiring process…
isn’t the candidate.
It’s the leadership team they interview with.

Here’s the story.

A company brought us a candidate for a senior role — we’ll call her Esther.
Impressive background.
Measured communicator.
Calm under pressure.
The kind of leader who doesn’t flinch when things get messy.

She walks into the final-round panel…
and asks the simplest question a leader can ask:

“What decisions will I have authority over in this role?”

You would think that’s straightforward.
It wasn’t.

One executive said,
“You’ll have full ownership.”

Another executive cut him off with,
“Well… you’ll run things by us first.”

A third added,
“It really depends on the week.”

Esther didn’t say a word.
She didn’t need to.

The leadership gap had already exposed itself.

No alignment.
No clarity.
No trust.
No unified direction.

After the interview, the CEO said:
“She seemed hesitant.
I’m not sure she’s strong enough for the role.”

But that wasn’t the truth.
Her hesitation wasn’t weakness.
It was awareness.

She realized she was interviewing for a title —
not actual authority.

At Mai Placement, we see this all the time:
Companies want strong leaders…
but their structure only supports followers.

If your executives can’t agree on who owns what,
you don’t have a talent problem —
you have a leadership architecture problem.

Great candidates don’t fear responsibility.
They fear stepping into roles where accountability exists without authority.

Esther declined the offer.
Not because she wasn’t capable —
but because she was smart.

And that’s the lesson:
Before you ask whether the candidate is right for the role,
ask whether the role is actually ready for a real leader.

Because top talent won’t walk into confusion.
And they definitely won’t stay in it.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

The Lie About “Cultural Fit”

Most companies say they’re hiring for “cultural fit.”
But what they really mean is:
“hire someone who won’t disrupt the status quo.”

That’s not culture.
That’s comfort.

At Mai Placement, we see the impact every day:
Companies hire for sameness → performance dips.
They hire for alignment → performance explodes.

Because cultural fit isn’t about personality.
It’s about behavior, values, and how someone makes decisions under pressure.

If your culture rewards accountability, honesty, and speed…
and you hire a brilliant operator who avoids conflict and needs layers of approval —
that’s not a fit.

Cultural fit isn’t soft.
It’s strategy.
And it’s one of the strongest predictors of long-term success.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

The Candidate Who Saved the Company From Itself

Every once in a while, a candidate shows up not to fit the culture…
but to expose what the culture could become.

This is that story.

A high-growth company came to us overwhelmed — scaling fast, burning out leaders, losing top performers.
They thought they needed “another operator.”

What they actually needed was a reset.

Enter Moshe — a candidate unlike anyone on their team.
Direct.
Thoughtful.
Deeply aligned with outcomes, not politics.
A calm operator with a systems mind.

In the interview, he didn’t try to impress them.
He asked the questions no one else thought to ask:

“What’s breaking your team today?”
“What accountability structure protects your priorities?”
“What decisions are slowing down execution?”
“How do you handle misalignment at the leadership level?”

By the time he finished, the executives weren’t evaluating him anymore.
They were evaluating themselves.

And here’s the twist:
Before Moshe even got the offer, the CEO pulled me aside and said,
“We learned more about our leadership gaps in one hour with him than in the last year.”

That’s the moment I knew —
this wasn’t a candidate who fit their culture.
This was a candidate who REVEALED their culture.
And, more importantly,
who could elevate it.

They hired him.

Six months later:
• turnover down
• clarity up
• execution faster
• leadership healthier
• the entire team communicating with purpose, not panic

He didn’t save the company.
He saved the culture from repeating its own patterns.

And that’s why at Mai Placement, we don’t just look for hires.
We look for inflection points —
leaders who shift the trajectory of a business,
not just fill a seat.

Because the right hire doesn’t join your culture.
They transform it.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

If you cannot explain your value, your number is meaningless

One of the most common questions candidates struggle with is
Why do you believe you are worth this salary?

Silence usually follows.
Or vague answers about experience, loyalty, or effort.

That is not value.
That is history.

At Mai Placement, strong candidates do not talk about time spent.
They talk about impact delivered.

They explain
what they owned
what they fixed
what they built
what changed because they were there.

Weak candidates hide behind titles.
Strong candidates explain outcomes.

If you cannot clearly articulate your value
the market will not guess for you.

Compensation follows clarity.
Not confidence.
Not hope.

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

Most companies don’t have a hiring problem.
They have a culture problem they keep trying to hire their way out of.

And after years inside boardrooms, leadership searches, and executive interviews at Mai Placement, here’s the truth no one wants to say out loud:

“Cultural fit” is the laziest concept in hiring.
It’s vague.
It’s misused.
And half the time, it’s an excuse for avoiding hard conversations about leadership, alignment, and accountability.

I’ve seen it all:

• Companies rejecting powerhouse candidates because they asked real questions.
• Teams hiring “nice” instead of hiring effective.
• Leaders confusing comfort with capability.
• Panels mistaking dysfunction for “not a fit.”
• Cultures so unclear that a candidate exposes the cracks in 20 minutes.

And the punchline?
The best hires often look NOTHING like “cultural fit.”
They’re the ones who challenge you.
Who force clarity.
Who raise standards.
Who reveal the structure you think you have versus the structure you actually run on.

Meanwhile, the so-called “perfect fit” is often the one who blends in…
right into the very patterns that are holding the company back.

Cultural fit doesn’t scale.
Cultural clarity does.

And when companies finally understand this difference, everything changes:

• retention stabilizes
• execution speeds up
• accountability strengthens
• leaders actually lead
• the culture becomes intentional instead of accidental

This is why at Mai Placement, we don’t hire for fit.
We hire for alignment with the culture you’re trying to build — not the one you’re stuck in.

The candidate who tells you the truth in the interview?
Hire them.

The one who exposes the gaps you’ve been ignoring?
Hire them.

The one who forces leadership to get aligned before they walk in the door?
Hire them.

Because the right hire doesn’t mirror your culture.
They elevate it.
And the wrong hire doesn’t disrupt your culture.
They reinforce it.

Most leaders don’t have a talent shortage.
They have a truth shortage.

And great talent will always feel that first.

—

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

Experience is not the same as impact

Ten years in a role does not automatically equal seniority.
It means you were present.

What matters is progression.
Scope.
Decision making.
Ownership.

I see candidates with long resumes who never owned outcomes.
And others with fewer years who carried real responsibility.

The market knows the difference.
That is why some people plateau
while others accelerate.

At Mai Placement, we do not count years.
We evaluate impact.

Because experience without results is comfort.
And comfort does not command premium pay.

𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭?
If you want to see more
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 🔔 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞!
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭

taplio

The Battle

Karim Kuperhause

Joel Brody

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreKarim Kuperhause's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJoel Brody's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Karim Kuperhause

Joel Brody

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Karim Kuperhause's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJoel Brody's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreKarim Kuperhause's LinkedIn Performance