The Dating App Founder | 8M members | Bootstrapped startup with a team of 50+ | Co-founder & COO of Inner Circle | Follow for insights on business, leadership and relationships

I build and scale companies by raising standards, strengthening teams, and scaling execution.

I’m an entrepreneur with over 14 years of experience founding and scaling businesses. 
I’m the Co-Founder of Inner Circle, a dating app founded in 2012, which has grown to over 8 million users across 50 countries. 

As Chief Operating Officer and acting Chief Marketing Officer, I sit at the intersection of leadership, hiring, execution, and growth.

Across that journey, I’ve helped build teams from 0 to more than 50 people across two continents. 
I’ve interviewed 1,000's of candidates and hired 100's of high performers, giving me a front-row seat to what separates teams that scale from those that stall. 

As companies grow, performance rarely breaks because of strategy. It breaks when clarity fades, standards slip, and execution becomes inconsistent. My perspective is practical and grounded in operating reality. High-performing companies are built by A-player teams, clear priorities, and leaders who combine ownership with humanity. 

My leadership principles are:

⟶ Disciplined execution beats complexity. 
⟶ Trust works when standards are explicit. 
⟶ Momentum comes from focus, not motion.

This account is for founders and leaders who want to build companies that perform consistently as they grow, without losing speed, accountability, or their human edge.

To collaborate with me as a creator please contact: enquiries@alecrickard.com

Michael Krayenhoff

Most founders don't have a talent problem.

They have an "overthinking" problem.

The way you frame a hard moment decides everything.
Not your skills. Not your network.

The story you tell yourself.

Every team eventually hits a wall.
A bad hire. A missed target. A product that didn't land.

What separates the ones who recover from the ones who don't?

They see the same situation differently.

Learning to code at 35 wasn't about code.
It was about proving to myself that hard things are learnable.
That discomfort isn't a stop sign. It's a starting line.

That shift changed how teams around me operate too.

When the leader treats hard problems as puzzles, not threats,
the team starts doing the same.

It's not about being positive all the time.
It's about training yourself to ask a better question.

Not "why is this happening to us?"
But "what does this make possible?"

That's the real competitive edge.
Not the strategy deck. Not the funding round.

The mind you bring into the room every morning.

Train it like a muscle.
Push it when it wants to stop.
Question the first story it tells you.

The obstacle doesn't change.
But what you do with it always depends on how you see it.

What's one moment where changing your thinking changed the outcome entirely?

Drop it below. I'd love to read it.

♻ If this was useful, repost so more founders see it
✅ Follow Michael Krayenhoff for more on building teams, leadership, and careers

I’m a global entrepreneur who has spearheaded numerous ventures. I serve as President/CEO of The Atlas Network, LLC, a global supply chain enterprise offering comprehensive end-to-end services, including Consulting, Product Development, Factory Selection, Mass Production Oversight/Management, Quality Control, Documentation, Logistics, Shipping, and Storage.

I’m the Founder and CEO of The Global Crosswalk, LLC, a SaaS solutions platform that streamlines project lifecycles for the supply chain industry. I’m also the founder and co-host of the “Supply & Demand Show,” on YouTube. And the author of the best-selling book "Supply Chain Ups and Downs".

I make deals across diverse sectors - Technology, Retail, Entertainment, Real Estate, Spirits, Packaging, Sports Equipment, Medical, Import/Export, and Banking. I’ve held notable positions at NASD/FINRA (National Association of Securities Dealers), Accenture, SEC, Friedman Billings Ramsey, and 24/7 Media.

I hold a BA in Finance, International Business, and Marketing from Washington University in St. Louis, an MBA in Business Law and Finance from American University, and an Artificial Intelligence and Business Strategy certification from MIT.  I’m a continuous learner pursuing equilibrium in thought, culture, business practices, and amongst people.

Kerim Kfuri

I spent years walking into facilities with my own answers.
The warehouse associate had better ones. 
I just wasn't asking.

This is understandable.

We're paid to move fast. 
To diagnose. 
To fix.

But here's what I've noticed.

The warehouse associate knows which supplier's pallets arrive damaged.
The shift supervisor knows which quality check gets skipped when pressure hits.
The procurement coordinator knows which vendor is a liability, but smiles through every call.

They know because they live it.
Not in quarterly reviews. 
In real time.

We conflate expertise with hierarchy.
We mistake confidence for correctness.
We sit in rooms full of titles, debating theories.
While the people who touch the product every day wait to be asked one simple question.

Not "what's the data say?"
Not "show me the report."
Just: what would you change?

The answer is almost always right.
And rarely in the presentation.

The smartest person in the supply chain isn't the one with all the answers.
It's the leader who asks the warehouse associate what they would change.

The quiet cost?
Problems that stay invisible until they're emergencies.
Solutions that look good on paper but break on the floor.
A culture where the people closest to the work learn that speaking is optional.

The smartest person in the room isn't the loudest.
It's the one who knows where the real expertise lives.

💬 When did someone on the front line last teach you something the data missed?

♻️ Save this before your next facility visit.

➡️ Follow for more on the leadership behind the logistics.

Supply Chain Expert | Global Brands Partner: Daymond John & Alibaba.com Seen on CNBC & FOX. Optimizing operations for maximum revenue.

A leadership team called me in to understand why their supply chain kept breaking.

The procurement lead walked through the latest failure…

A key delivery was late.
Production stalled.
Customers were waiting.

They selected this vendor eight months ago.
Cost was right.
Quality held up.
Lead times worked.

It was a logical choice.

Then things shifted.
A labor strike at a port.
A raw material shortage upstream.
A currency swing that squeezed margins.

Nothing dramatic.
Just enough.

When the review began, the room turned.

The first question wasn't about market conditions.
It wasn't about what could have been done differently.

It was: "Whose recommendation was this?"

That question landed.

Not because it was aggressive.
Because everyone knew what came next.

Not learning.
Not problem-solving.
Just accountability finding its target.

The procurement lead didn't defend the logic.
They just waited for it to pass.

Here's what actually broke:

Not the supply chain.
The courage to try something new.

Forecasts will now get padded.
Decisions will wait for certainty.
The safest answer from now on is:
"Let's stay with what's proven."

Not because anyone is lazy.
Because the system just taught them what gets remembered.

Strong leaders separate bad luck from bad logic.
Weak ones treat them the same.

The difference doesn't show up in the review.
It shows up months later.
In the risks people stop taking.

💬 Have you ever watched good people go quiet after a failure was handled the wrong way?

♻️ Save this for the next time you're reviewing what went wrong.

➡️ Follow for more on what actually breaks in supply chains and the leaders trying to fix them.

No alternative text description for this image

20 years in supply chain taught me this.
It's not in the factory. Not in the forecast.

It's in the gap between knowing what needs to happen and actually deciding to do it.

I've sat in rooms where everyone knew the supplier had to go. 
Everyone knew the process was broken. 
Everyone knew the data was sufficient. 

But no one would say it. 

So they optimized around the problem instead of solving it. 
Another quarter. 
Another year. 
Another missed opportunity.

The companies that win aren't the ones with perfect information. 
They're the ones with the least friction between insight and action.

💬 What decision are you waiting for "more data" on that you already know you need to make?

♻️ Save this for your next leadership meeting.

➡️ Follow for more. 20 years of supply chain observations, delivered weekly.

☎️ Book a free meeting at kerimkfuri.com/connect. Let's discuss the hidden cost your team is carrying.

#supplychain #leadership #procurement #operations

Data doesn't delay supply chains. Decisions do.

I used to think my job was predicting the next disruption.
Tariffs. Weather. Geopolitics. The next thing that would break.

Spent hours reading. 
Forecasting. 
Building contingency plans for scenarios that might never come.

This is understandable.
When you lead operations, you're paid to see around corners.
But here's what I've learned.

You will never predict them all.

The ones you miss will be the ones that hurt most.
And the team waiting for your perfect forecast?
They don't need a fortune teller. They need a foundation.

Building people who don't freeze when the plan fails.
Cultivating leaders who can think without a playbook.
Creating a culture where "I don't know yet" is followed by "but I'll figure it out."

The disruptions keep coming.
That's not a bug. It's the setting

The best supply chain leaders don't predict disruptions.
They build teams that outlast them.

Not because the forecasts get better.
Because the people get stronger.

The quiet cost?
Teams that rely on the leader's foresight rather than their own.
Organisations that react brilliantly to predicted risks, then crumble at the first surprise.

You can't predict the unpredictable.
You can only outlast it.
Together.

💬 Who on your team surprised you last month by handling something you didn't train them for?

♻️ Save this for the next time you catch yourself trying to forecast the unforeseeable.

➡️ Follow for more on building leaders, not just contingency plans.

I walked into an organization where the strategy was clear.

The goals were set. The team was capable…

Everyone knew what needed to happen.

Six months later, nothing had moved.

The leader was frustrated.
“We agreed on everything.
Why aren’t we executing?”

I started asking around.
Not in meetings.
In quiet conversations.

One person finally said it:
“Every time I’ve spoken up, I’ve regretted it.”

Not because they were wrong.
Because nothing changed.
Risks they flagged got ignored.
Problems they predicted arrived anyway.

And when they did, no one remembered the warning.
They just inherited the mess.

That person learned something.

Speaking up didn’t protect them.
It just put their name next to problems they couldn’t fix alone.

So they stopped.

Here’s what leaders miss:

Alignment isn’t agreement.
It’s protection.

People share what they see when they trust you’ll cover them.
Not when they think you’ll leave them exposed.

The strategy was fine.
The safety wasn’t.

💬 Have you ever watched good people go quiet?

♻️ Save this for the next time you wonder why execution stalls.

➡️ Follow for more on what actually kills momentum.

The shipments kept moving.

The people kept showing up.

Everything else this week?
Noise.

The margin compression you couldn't fix fast enough.
The supplier who went quiet mid-week.
The email chain that should have been a phone call.

All of it real.
All of it demanding attention.

But here's what experience teaches slowly:

You can recover from a bad quarter.
You can find a new supplier.
You can unwind a rushed decision.

What you cannot rebuild quickly is the quiet willingness of your people to carry the weight again tomorrow.

That's the only metric that actually matters.

Not because the others don't.
Because without this one, the others eventually stop moving entirely.

A team that kept showing up.
Through the problems, the pressure, the predictable chaos of any week in this work—tells you something more valuable than any dashboard.

It tells you trust is still intact.
That clarity survived the noise.
Whatever broke this week, the thing that holds it all together didn't.

So before you open the spreadsheet again tonight, sit with this:

The shipments kept moving.
The people kept showing up.

💬 What did this week teach you about yours?

♻️ Save this for the week you confuse activity with what's actually moving.

➡️ Follow for more leadership that measures what matters most.

Here's what I often see from leaders claiming full supply chain visibility…

They believe they see everything.
They're tracking almost nothing that matters.

What leaders believe:

"We have full visibility."

What they actually have:
Lagging output metrics.
Reports on what already happened.
Dashboards full of data, empty of insight.

Visibility isn't a screen.
It's knowing what your team isn't telling you.

What leaders believe:

"We measure what matters."

What they actually measure:
On-time delivery.
Defect rates.
Supplier scorecards.

All important.
All backward-looking.
All silent on what's coming.

By the time these move, the problem already landed.

What leaders believe:

"We see problems early."

What actually happens:
The team fixes issues before reporting them.
Workarounds become process.
Heroes emerge. Systems stay fragile.

"Early" means before the P&L feels it.
Not before the team does.

This isn't a data problem.
It's a belief problem.

You trust what's measured.
Your team trusts what's hidden.

By the time both of you agree that something is wrong, the cost is already locked in.
The margin already leaked.
The trust already eroded.

The quiet consequence?

You start leading with confidence in the wrong picture.
Your team starts managing based on your belief, not the reality.

And the gap between them?
That's where surprises are born.

💬 Where does your belief differ from their reality? Not in the dashboard. In the conversation you're not having.

♻️ Save this for the next time you review metrics and something feels off but you can't name it.

➡️ Follow for more patterns that separate what leaders think from what's actually true.

The shipments kept moving.

The problems kept coming…

And somewhere in the middle of it all, your people did something that won't show up in any report.

They solved. 
They adapted. 
They carried the weight.

But here's what actually matters this week:

Not the problems solved.
The fact that they still made it home.

We measure so much in this work.
On-time delivery. 
Margin variance. 
Supplier response times.

But we rarely measure the cost of the solving.
The quiet toll of constantly compensating.
The exhaustion that doesn't register until the weekend arrives.

A team that performs under pressure is one thing.
A team that performs under pressure and still has something left for Monday—for themselves, for their people, for the life outside these walls—is everything.

That's not a process win.
That's a leadership win.

The kind that doesn't come from better forecasting or tighter contracts.
It comes from knowing when to push and when to protect.
When to expect more and when to say: enough.

So this weekend, if you're still running the numbers, still replaying the conversations, still carrying Friday into Saturday—stop.

The shipments will move again on Monday.
The problems will be waiting.

But the team that made it through this week?
They need you to model what rest looks like.

💬 What's the one thing you're setting down tonight so they can too?

♻️ Save this for the weekend when you need permission to stop.

➡️ Follow for more leadership that measures what actually matters.

Your tariff model is lying to you.

It captures the duty. It misses the distraction. 

The 15% you see on the spreadsheet isn't the full cost. 

The full cost is the senior planner who spent Tuesday rerouting around a new levy instead of optimizing the network. 

The procurement lead who killed a strategic initiative to qualify an emergency supplier. 

The ops team that canceled planning to chase parts.

Tariffs don't just move money. 
They move attention. 
And attention is your scarcest resource.

The question isn't "How do we minimize duty?" 
It's "What are we willing to stop doing every time tariffs change?"

💬 What strategic work got delayed the last time your team had to react to a tariff shift?

♻️ Save this for your next operations review.

➡️ Follow for more. I decode the hidden costs in your supply chain P&L.

#supplychain #tariffs #procurement #leadership #operations

taplio

The Battle

Michael Krayenhoff

Kerim Kfuri

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreMichael Krayenhoff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreKerim Kfuri's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Michael Krayenhoff

Kerim Kfuri

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Michael Krayenhoff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreKerim Kfuri's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreMichael Krayenhoff's LinkedIn Performance