Matt Barker

I make posting on LinkedIn fast, easy and fun. $3M+ revenue driven. 75M+ impressions. 250k+ followers.

I help you grow on LinkedIn using fast, easy and fun to write posts.

Results:

- 50+ clients helped since January 2022
- 2,500+ customers served
- £70k 4 day course launch (The Digital Copywriter)
- 2 x £100k+ digital products launched
- $3M+ in new client revenue driven
- 75M+ organic social views earned
- 200k+ LinkedIn followers gained
- 10,000+ LinkedIn posts created
- 13,000+ email subscribers driven

If you'd like to work together on growing:

- Your LinkedIn profile
- Your team's LinkedIn profile
- Your brand's LinkedIn profile

And growing in a way that is fast, easy and fun to do?

Just DM me so we can discuss how I can help you do that.

Writer

Join 11,000+ readers who get daily tips on attracting dream clients online with digital copywriting.

I have one strict rule for writing LinkedIn hooks.

(been ruthless with my clients on this in 2025 & '26)

My strict rule:

If your hook could be written by 10,000 other people, you are instantly a commodity.

So before you post, ask:

“Can anyone else write this?”

If yes, your hook is generic → rewrite it.

If no, your hook is specific → it stands out → it earns attention → it’s more likely to pull in new followers.

How to fix a “yes” hook (quick and easy):

Add one specific detail from Lived Experience.

- a moment (“Last week I…”)
- a result (“In January my client…”)
- a confession (“I used to…”)
- a quote (“A client asked me…”)
- a number (“I’ve coached 38…”)

That’s it. 

Literally the same idea but now it feels real and it stops blending in with AI-tinted advice posts.

e.g. 

In this post, I mention "I have this strict rule" and "ruthless with my clients". words like "I" and "my" force Lived Experience and that = more unique.

I can't see myself slowing down on this rule.

What do you think?

P.S. Want to write unique LinkedIn posts that grow your followers? You'll need a writing system for that. Here’s a 14 minute training I made for you: https://lnkd.in/d29V4rih

Matt Barker 

Fast, Easy & Fun LinkedIn Writing. 3,675 people taught. Investor @ MagicPost. Follow for posts on Writing, Marketing and Business.

I've written on LinkedIn since early '22 and yes, the game has changed. For the better or worse? Depends how you look at it. But I used to:

- throw up any random carousel
- watch it get 1,000 likes + 100k impressions
- and 1,000+ new followers

That was pretty cool not gonna lie!

(carousels can still smash btw. client of mine just grew about 2k followers, got 700+ likes and 100k impressions from one with about 18k followers)

I don't do that anymore because:

1. i'm more bothered about working on my business
2. i'm more bothered about spending time with my wife
3. i'm more bothered about not being a content / growth addict

(here's how I'm writing posts that drive new followers these days: https://lnkd.in/d29V4rih)

I much prefer to:

- write what i want to write
- do it quickly, easily and in a fun way
- get on with other things in my life

That's just me and my approach.

But there is a big sentiment going around that growing followers on LinkedIn is impossible now. 

It's not impossible, but:

- posts don't seem to go big as much as they used to 
- there's overinflated expectations of how easy linkedin is
- as always, you still have to put in hard work

Combine that together and you get people moaning.

So where does that leave you, if you're just starting writing or already started and not sure if you should continue writing?

My advice to you:

1. Decide if you actually care about growing an audience
(hint: you definitely should)
2. If the answer is yes, think what platform is best for YOU
3. If it's LinkedIn, then yes invest your time in writing there

But please, prioritise making it enjoyable.

Take pride in the process, the writing.

Not the follower numbers and impression counts.

🤘

You’ll hate reading this. But last year, I:

- grew 54,000 followers
- ⁠generated 16M+ impressions
- ⁠⁠made $387k for my one man writing biz

All from writing on silly ol' LinkedIn.

But here’s the real silly thing:

There’s TONS of people smashing it on here.

- ⁠ ⁠Nick Broekema's clients did multi 6 figs w/ content design
- ⁠ ⁠Jacob Pegs​ drives $1.5k daily with passive income 
- ⁠ ⁠Louis Butterfield​ drove $2.4M pipeline for clients with video

I asked them to tell me how they do it. They agreed.

Here's a quick breakdown of exactly how me, Nick, Jacob & Louis personally use LinkedIn to get attention + make money:

(ya might wanna save this for later)

1.⁠ ⁠Matt Barker​ (me). Niche: Writing.

- ⁠Post on LI 7 x per wk (scheduled w magicpost.in)
- ⁠Educational posts to make LI writing fast, easy & fun
- ⁠⁠Stories from working with clients + my life
- ⁠⁠Add link to free resources in posts
- I get their email address (using Kit​)
- ⁠⁠Send automated email sequence
- ⁠⁠Pitch new subs to my Skool​ community
- ⁠⁠After, email 5 x per wk to keep in touch
- ⁠⁠Promote new offer monthly (community/cohorts/1-1)

2.⁠ ⁠Nick Broekema. Niche: Content Design.​

- Talks about Content Design (copy/design/sales)
- Shares 1-5x posts p/w on the fly (whenever he can)
- Content drives people to waitlists and full email list
- Writes 3 emails per week (stories, educational, promo)
- Clients buy through the DMs, waitlists, and email list
- Launches Content Design private group in early April 

3.⁠ ⁠Jacob Pegs. Niche: Offer Funnels.​

- Writes 7x LI posts/wk, 3 drive people to email list 
- ⁠Low ticket funnel to $9 micro “snack” solving 1 core problem 
- ⁠Triggers 4 emails ascending to bigger "snack"
- Leads become customers 
- ⁠Daily email alternating low + high ticket offers
- Turns leads → customers → clients 
- ⁠Runs low cost meta ads to supplement organic 
- ⁠1 long form vid/wk to nurture existing email list 
- ⁠Ascend lower tier clients → higher tiers of proximity on a quarterly basis

4.⁠ ⁠Louis Butterfield​. Niche: Video.

- Makes 1-2 videos per week + panel lives
- Short form to go niche viral, long form to stack trust
- Uses Claude to write scripts + posts (edits in his voice)
- Mix of unhinged zany beard energy and client results
- Simple 5-10 day campaigns monthly to create urgency
- Simple waitlist to capture demand
- Once on waitlist, nurture w emails + videos 2-3x/wk
- Run small cohorts + 1:1 to go deep
- Markets client results

We've all been posting for 2+ years.

What else do you want to know?

Jure Knehtl

Growth Expert for International Scaling ECOM Brands

3x Founder | 2x CMO from 0 to 50M+ € in Europe | Now building my own eCommerce brand 🛠️

Hey, nice to meet you. I am Jure Knehtl (also called JK), driven by results, creativity, and being a distributor on the market.

In my career, I helped generate 300M+ € eCommerce revenue for my partners by developing a customized marketing mix to maximize the brandformance.

For the last 11+ years, I've been leveraging Meta ads, TikTok, Influencer marketing, scientific performance-oriented creatives, localization, and retention channels to help DTC brands grow.

Here are 3 of my biggest successes so far:
- Built the whole marketing department from scratch and reached an explosive growth of a bootstrapped eCommerce business from 0 to 50M € revenue in 4 years.
- Founded a Boutique DTC Performance agency WeScale, in 2020, that grew to 20+ team members and 5 Mio € revenue in 3 years.
- Hyper-Scaled a beauty brand from 0 to 100M € revenue in 3 years, profitability.
 
❤️ Growth, leadership & basketball.
🛠 Chasing the NEXT WIN.

Knowing that I have more to offer, I apply that same drive to work with established brands as well as brands looking to make that pro jump.

If you have a question or just want to exchange ideas - send me a message - I look forward to our conversation!

Want to get in touch about the potential collaboration, mentorship or a speaking gig?
Email me: jure.knehtl.digital@gmail.com

Chief Executive Officer

At WeScale DTC performance marketing agency, I am in charge of building an ecosystem and strategy to empower the growth of fast-growing DTC brands.

We built multiple 8-figure brands in Europe with the help of scientific creatives, behavior-driven media buying & advanced acquisition strategies.

WeScale performance 🚀 numbers:
• +152 Mio € revenue generated across all our clients
• +41 Mio € ad spend across Meta, TikTok & Google
• Scaled a business from 7 Mio to 25 Mio €
• 1.1 Mio € Revenue in 72 hours
• 27,000 products sold in 1 day

Click the links below and check our value posts 👀

Want to get in touch?
Email me: jure.knehtl@wescale.agency

Jure 🚀 Knehtl

Last week, I spoke to +60 startup founders about Meta ads.

We dived into:
- What works and what doesn't in 2026
- Creative process and strategy that brings profitable results
- Effective scaling in 2026 (beyond Ads Manager)
- How to plan and execute a GTM strategy on a new market and/or product
- Optimization beyond the ad metrics
- Practical success cases

I haven't done a speech in a while, but it was great to be back and share my knowledge with the audience. It always energizes me to push the event further and never stop growing, improving, and learning.

The founders were curious, asking practical questions and explaining their situations and challenges, which led to a great discussion at the end with Q&A.

My knowledge was shared, but remember:

"Knowledge is power only if you use it."

Thank you for organizing this great event SBC - Slovenian Business Club & special thanks to David Žalec for the invite!

undefined undefined

Webinar May

⤷ Check my newest article HERE: https://wescalebrands.io/articles/what-ecommerce-brands-need-to-go-from-100000-e-monthly-revenue-to-1000000-e/

Checklist

⤷ Get your free 23 Step Ecom Checklist: https://wescalebrands.io/checklist-and-growth-tips/

Founder/Growth CMO🚀 • Growth Advisor • 300M+ € Sales Generated in Europe • On a Mission to Scale Profitably

Everyone thinks they know Meta ads. 

But the game has changed. 
It’s no longer about fancy hacks or secret settings. 

It’s about understanding the platform’s core mechanics and how to leverage them for sustainable growth. 

In 2026, it’s all about creative testing, data-driven decisions, and a deep understanding of your customer.

9/10 times, when we launch whitelisting (partnership) ads on an account, they outperform everything else.

Different niches. Different budgets. Same outcome.

We combine:
- Different following sizes
- Different personas
- Content formats
- Copy angles

Been working especially well for acquiring new customers.

Not a hack — just how trust scales in paid media.

Use that insight however you want.

Nobody can guarantee results in ECOM or marketing. Nobody. 
 
There are no such things as: 
 
- We guarantee X revenue. 
- We guarantee X ROAS. 
- We guarantee X CPA. 
 
Period. 
 
Working in ECOM and marketing for 10+ years, people often ask if I can guarantee results. 
 
As good as it would be to say YES, I can't say that. 
 
If it were that simple, every ECOM brand would be successful, and all of us would be billionaires. 
 
There is only: 
 
- Frameworks. 
- Testing. 
- Reading data. 
- Learning. 
- Iterating. 
 
Sure, the more experiences you have, the more you know what to do because you have many tests under your belt. 
 
Each case is different. 
 
But nothing is guaranteed. 
 
Those who 100% guarantee don't know enough. 🤝 
 
What do you think about this?

True ad creative winner is not defined by: 
 
- CTR 
- Hook rate 
- Hold rate 
- ATC rate 
- CPM 
 
Although these secondary metrics matter as well. 
 
True ad creative winner is defined by VOLUME 🏆 
 
This means: 
1) how much budget can you invest behind the creative 
2) how broad it can go with targeting and 
3) the number of purchases it generates 
 
... while still hitting the successful KPI 🚀 
 
Remember that.

Stop criticizing your leaders 🛑

If you have never led yourself, or your leader has:
- <10 years of experience
- 0 leadership coaching
- They have been put in the situation because they were excellent with execution and produced results.

Instead of talking behind their backs and addressing the work environment with others ...

Give them direct feedback and support them 🙏

IMPORTANT (!) Feedback goes both ways. You need to share and listen and not take things personally. That's often the most challenging part for all.

THE TRUTH:
It is HARD to be a young and inexperience leader

I did it myself:
a) Leading 30 people in the marketing department when I was only 26
b) Leading 32 people inside my growth agency at the age of 29 

But the reality check:
Was I the best leader? NO
Did I always make the right decisions? Big NO
Did I have a great leader in the past from whom I could learn? NO
Did I have a great mentor? NO
Did I have leadership experience? NO

But I tried my BEST every single day.

And many great things happened because of it 🙏❤️

Thanks to all the people in the team, business partners, and leadership for putting me in that position so I could grow and become the version of JK I am today.

So shoutout to all the young inexperience leaders out there who are trying their best 🙏❤️

Keep going 💪

And for the rest, support them, work with them, and give them feedback so you all can thrive 🚀

Why do most brands implement CONTENT CREATORS into their content creation process for paid ads 🤔 
 
- Native to the platform 
- Social proof 
- Performance 
- Local language 
- Speed of creation 
- Investment efficiency 
- Great for ads + landing pages 
- Opportunity for Whitelisting 
- Creative diversity 
 
One of the key areas that help me scale 10+ brands above 8 figures and what I work on with my coaching clients. 
 
But what makes the difference? 
 
Just hiring a couple of creators won't be enough... 
 
You have to: 
1) Do the research 
2) Ideation 
3) Create strong briefs 
4) Provide feedback and examples 
5) Share the performance and potential upgrades across creators 
6) Build long-term partnerships

Most fast-scaling DTC brands are crushing it with their creators' programs - Don't stop - think outside the box!

Creative velocity = speed of creative iteration → equals speed of learning → equals speed of scale.

Slow velocity = slow learning = slow scale.
Fast velocity = fast learning = asymmetric scale.

(1) Output Metrics
These answer: How much are we producing?

Examples:
a) Concepts per week
A “concept” = new idea/angle/storyline (not just a new edit)
World-class brands: 5–15/week

b) Variations per concept
Variations are hooks, CTAs, formats, lengths, talent swaps, etc.
Top performers: 3–7 variations per concept

c) Total new creatives shipped
Concepts × Variations = total launch volume
Top performers: 20–50 new ads/week shipped into testing

These metrics tell you raw output speed.

(2) Speed Metrics
These answer: How fast can we learn?

a) Time to launch (TTL)
Idea → Live in account
Healthy TTL: 3–10 days
Bad TTL: 4–8 weeks

b) Time to kill (TTK)
Launch → Decision to kill
If you let losers run too long, they eat signal and distort data.
Good TTK: 24–72 hours

c) Time to iterate (TTI)
Kill → New improved version shipping
Healthy TTI: 3–7 days
Combine them and you get:
TTL + TTK + TTI = Loop duration

High creative velocity = short loop
Low creative velocity = long loop

(3) Quality / Outcome Metrics
These answer: Does creative actually drive performance?

Important ones:
a) Winner rate
% of creatives that break even or scale
Good winner rate in DTC: 8–20%
Bad winner rate: 1–5%

b) Scaler rate
% of creatives that scale past learning phase with profit
World class: 1–3%
This statement scares most founders — scaling is selective.

c) Longevity
How long before a creative fatigues?
A great creative might scale for: 4–12 weeks
A bad one fatigues in: 3–7 days

Key takeaway:
Most brands stuck at €1–3M ARR have creative velocity problems — not Meta problems.

Slow velocity = slow learning = slow scale.
Fast velocity = fast learning = asymmetric scale.

Here’s something marketers don’t say enough:

✨ Paid social isn’t harder now — it’s more honest.

Meta no longer rewards:
- Clever structure hacks
- Tiny audience overlaps
- “magic budget” scaling

Meta rewards strong signals — signals that look like real business momentum:
✔ High conversion rates
✔ Consistent add-to-cart behavior
✔ Strong repeat purchase trends
✔ Clear, differentiated creative

So the real shift isn’t: harder platforms —
— it’s platforms that expose weak strategy faster.

If you’re blaming the algorithm, first ask:
- Is my funnel signal strong enough?
- Is my creative telling a real story and dressing the targeted customers?

Drop YES if this resonates — or comment with one thing you’re rethinking about paid social right now 👇

Performance marketing has changed, so should you:

1) ROAS ➪ NC (New customer's) ROAS
2) MER ➪ % of profitability, GM per order
3) Blended CPO ➪ NC CPA
4) Media buying hacks ➪ Creative strategy
5) Product pages ➪ Landing pages
6) Evergreen sitewide sales ➪ Bundles and special offers
7) Revenue ➪ New vs. returning customer's performance
8) Product you can sell through Facebook ➪ Upgraded with retention opportunities and reaching new customers

Which evolution is a MUST? Let's find the winner 🏆

Your ads aren’t converting for one of these three reasons: 

1. Your offer is weak. 
2. Your creative is boring. 
3. Your (creative) targeting is off. 

It’s that simple. 

Stop blaming the algorithm and start focusing on what you can control.

You might do all the right things, but if you do them on the wrong product, you won't be able to scale.

So many times, I see this with clients and brands I talk with.

They:
- Listen to the right podcasts
- Follow the right people who are doing it in practice and have proven traction
- Observing the right brands
- Operate on the scalable markets

The key learning:
"Not all products are scalable."

No matter if you:
- follow the scaling frameworks
- have great margins
- test creatives aggressively
- build landing pages 
- master ads and creatives
- have a great offer
- offer great customer experience

It's not going to work on all the products. PERIOD.

It's happened to me multiple times; although I was doing all the right things, the profitable scaling was just not there.

So don't ignore the Power of Finding the Right Product 🚀

It all starts there...

Watch out for that frequency 🛑🙊 
 
I just finished one account audit, and I wanted to share an interesting finding with you. 
 
On the discovery call client complained that none of the new creative tests 
 
Although I am really not a fan of testing in creative testing in Adavntage+ (lack of control), I looked into it. 
 
Here is what I found: 
💡 Missing existing customer budget cap 
💩 frequency 9 in 3 days + a LOT of negative comments connected to the frequency of ads 
 
*Note: they are an early startup that had a customer database of 3K customers 
​ 
My suggestions: 
(1) Test in ABO 
(2) Exclude existing buyers (always) 
(3) Analyze audience segments breakdown 
(4) Use Advantage+ for scaling

Most brands try to lower CAC by tweaking bids and budgets.

But that’s rarely where the real leverage is.

In my experience scaling e-commerce brands, new customer ROAS is mostly structural.

There are 4 levers that actually move CAC — and most brands are only using one or two of them.

1️⃣ Partnership & whitelisting ads (at scale)

When you run ads through creators whose audience already buys at your price point, you skip the entire trust-building phase.

Lower friction = lower CAC.

Each creator also unlocks a new micro-audience Meta couldn’t reach through your brand page alone.

And you’re feeding the algorithm more signals.

>>> Action point: Run ppartnership ads with bigger creators on your local market that already have your potential audience.


2️⃣ Different creative formats

 Meta doesn’t just read text.

 It reads visual patterns.

If you only run one type of creative, you’re forcing all buyers through one narrow door.

Different formats attract different buyers:
- Listicles
- Founder storytelling
- Lifestyle content
- Product breakdowns
- Problem/solution creatives

Each format opens a new audience pool.

>>> Action point: Make sure to introduce 1-3 creative formats on the bi-weekly basis 


3️⃣ Different personas

 Same creative.

 Different message.

A dad, a gym guy, and a 45-year-old executive buy the same product for completely different reasons.

The angle of the ad determines who Meta shows it to.

>>> Action point: Go beyond messaging - use creators, voiceovers, and adopted landing pages to the personas


4️⃣ Upper funnel exposure

 Reach campaigns don’t drive purchases directly.

But they pre-warm the market.

When someone has seen your brand 3–5 times before the conversion ad appears, your CAC drops dramatically.

>>> Action point: Run 5-15% of the total budget on campaigns that exclude buyers, visitors and engagers


These force Meta to actually hunt for new customers.
(But don’t assume Meta follows this perfectly.)

The real mechanism behind all 4 levers:
They expand your total addressable audience.

More qualified prospects → cheaper new customer acquisition.

If you’re only running:
 • broad campaigns
 • one creative format
 • one angle

You’re leaving a lot of efficiency on the table.

Curious how other brands structure their acquisition:

Which of these levers has had the biggest impact on your CAC?

taplio

The Battle

Matt Barker

Jure 🚀 Knehtl

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreMatt Barker's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJure 🚀 Knehtl's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Matt Barker

Jure 🚀 Knehtl

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Matt Barker's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJure 🚀 Knehtl's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreMatt Barker's LinkedIn Performance