Lead generation is broken.

Too many companies:

- Try to generate leads themselves, but fail
- Hire a lead gen agency with bloated retainers who can’t deliver

Lead generation as a whole is always changing, so unless you’ve got a dedicated team
on it (that knows what they’re doing) — you can expect to overpay for underwhelming
results.

That said, in 2025 — you don’t need to try to generate leads yourself, or pay an
outsized retainers for subpar work.

With Leadbird, you:

- Don’t pay for overpriced retainers
- Only pay per meeting-ready-lead we deliver
- Get the expertise of career outbound salespeople

We achieve this for you through:

- Targeted lead list building
- Domain + inbox set-up and warm-up
- Proven cold email copywriting principles
- Done-for-you cold email campaign management

Book a free demo from the link in my bio to join over 115 active clients getting
high-quality, meeting-ready-leads every single month.

Talk soon,
Nick

Nick Abraham

Maybe I’m falling for ragebait, but cold email has let me:

(1) Drop out of college.

(2) Grow my own agency to multi 7-figures of revenue.

(3) Employ 30+ people around the world full-time.

(4) Buy my sister and Dad cars.

(5) Rent my dream apartment.

(6) Buy my first 5 properties.

(7) Work with 100s of businesses.

(8) Make lifelong friends.

(9) Give my future family a financial head start.

Just remember, for every one person that dunks on cold outbound, there's another person whose life was changed because of it.

I send 2M+ cold emails and 1M+ LinkedIn DMs per month for 1,000+ active clients across Leadbird and Cleverly

Gemini 3 cannot sell a $10k service package.
GPT 5.1 cannot sell a $10k service package.
Llama 4 cannot sell a $10k service package.
Opus 4.5 cannot sell a $10k service package.
DeepSeek-R1 cannot sell a $10k service package.

A great human seller can.

I posted the below tweet earlier this year. If I could edit it, I would say:

“If I had a son, I would preach that you can either be top 1% in whatever job you have or risk losing it to AI’.”

Because “AI is going to eliminate [insert role]” is surface level thinking, and too broad of a generalization.

It is, of course, going to eliminate roles, but not roles in their entirety. 

Instead, it will eliminate the bottom 99% of certain roles while accelerating the top 1% of others.

Sales is a great example.

AI can handle a lot of the outreach process, even including script writing. What it can’t do is work a deal the way a human would.

The same can be said for a lot of software dev work, in my opinion. Great engineers will never be out of work, but average/mediocre ones likely will.

In short: if you want to AI-proof yourself, become top 1% at what you do. Easier said than done, I know…but very much worth it.

I jokingly posted this and SO many people commented or messaged about Agency 3 and asked for an intro. This is a huge problem.

This post was a joke. No lead gen agency worth their salt would ever take a deal in which they generate leads for clients, and only get paid if/when the client closes them.

We can't control what the client does after we generate the lead.

- What if they simply don’t engage with them?
- What if the lead asks to follow up later, and they don’t?
- What if their sales team just can’t close for their product/service?
- What if their pricing is way off the market norm?
- What if their reviews online are terrible, and the prospects drop out pre-call?
- What if they have no social proof and can't build trust with prospects?

There is so much that is out of the lead generation agency's control. 

Moreover, the client will have no skin in the game and not value the opportunity if they have no risk associated 

The agency can do their job perfectly and even go above and beyond and still make zero dollars because of something on client’s side.

Just a word of warning!

Excited and grateful to share I’ve reached 20,000 followers here on LinkedIn!

Almost 3 years ago, with 3,000 followers, I started posting the most valuable content I could every day (sometimes 2x per day).

Since then, I’ve been able to:

- Meet lots of awesome people I now consider friends.
- Learn a ton about outbound, GTM, and marketing.
- Attract incredible clients we’re extremely grateful for

Whether you were one of the first 3,000 or a part of the next 17,000, I truly want to say thank you. None of it's possible without you.

To that point, I only ask of you is to comment what type of content you want to see more of moving forward!

Super excited to show off our new client portal that makes it far easier for clients to track replies!

Before, we had clients logging into Smartlead to check email replies, then switching to a LinkedIn inbox manager for DM responses, then tracking cold calls elsewhere.

The entire lead gen operation was fragmented across three interfaces that didn't really interconnect.

Clients would miss responses because they forgot to check one of the platforms. They'd get confused about which channel was performing better. 

The biggest sign of this was support tickets kept coming in asking where to find specific replies.

So, we effectively rebuilt our client portal, using MasterInbox as the common thread. Now when clients log in, they see everything in one feed (emails, calls, DMs) that looks completely native to our platform.

Most importantly, clients have commented on how much easier this is for them.

Not to mention, it helps us, too. We've eliminated ~80% of the "where do I find my replies?" support requests. 

As for performance, clients are responding to leads faster because they're not losing track of conversations across multiple tools.

We're rolling this out to all clients because the upgrade is that significant.

Of the 1,000s of client campaigns we've run this year, the best-performer in recent memory was for a yoga studio.

I am big on local lead generation, and this is a perfect example of it. 

This yoga studio hired us to reach out to other businesses to try to get them to book group classes, retreats, off-sites, etc.

So, we scraped lead lists of local businesses and wrote a hyper-local cold email campaign to go with it.

And though you might expect the best performing campaign to be for an agency with a great offer or a hot new SaaS product, this blew others out of the water 

The point is that cold email for local businesses is wildly underrated. If you have or know of a local business interested in generating leads via cold email, feel free to reach out.

We’d love to replicate this.

If you’ve ever pulled leads from Apollo or anything else using “Industry” filters, read this post to make them way more accurate:

They have miscategorized companies in the industry that aren’t relevant to your ICP.

We've been using a new method to get our refined TAM into one list.

See, most lead lists give you name, email, company, LinkedIn URL, and a generic "industry" tag. The problem is that those industry classifications are wrong a lot of the time.

You end up messaging wrong accounts or missing perfect fits.

We found a way to fix this using data already in your lists.

Every company LinkedIn URL comes with an "About Us" section where they describe exactly what they do.

Process:

- Take 3-5 dream clients.
- Go to their LinkedIn About Us sections.
- Pull out every relevant keyword - product terms, customer segments, pain points, industry language. Build a keyword bank.

This takes 20 minutes.

Now layer this on top of broad industry tags. Instead of just "Healthcare," filter for Healthcare companies whose About Us mentions your specific keywords.

Gets you from the neighborhood into the right house.

This is basically advanced semantic filtering without expensive AI tools.

Use the company's own words to qualify them instead of relying on generic industry buckets.

My agency has 283 active clients. If we don't get to 1,000 by the end of 2026, I'll view the year as a failure. There are 3 things we need to do to get there:

LEVER 1 – Churn Reduction

We want to cut our churn in half.

Our sales team don't lie to prospects, but much of the churn does come from misaligned expectations around lead generation, so we are investing a lot in making that extremely clear up front.

LEVER 2 – More Time On Growth

This sounds obvious, but few people do it in practice. It's so easy to get caught up in day-to-day operations and not spend enough time on top of funnel activity.

There's so much more we could be doing (YouTube, ads, events, etc.) here.

LEVER 3 – Make Sure Our Team Levels Up

To serve 1,000 clients, we need to make sure our team is operating at all levels.

We had them at off-sites in Dubai and Cape Town in the past few months, and we'll do another one next year.

More tangibly, we are trying to get them more ingrained in lead gen overall.

We are asking them to go follow other leaders in the space and consume their content on a regular basis.

To me, this is an undeniable way to level up.

This comes off the heels of rebuilding our client portal and making it crystal clear and easy to operate. If you have any questions or want to see more on this, let me know.

Every time my family or friends came over and used my washroom, they'd come out laughing at me.

Not because of something in the washroom, but because of something they saw in my shower.

See, back then I used to write the most important goals in my life down and stick them on the wall in my shower.

This way, I would quite literally be forced to stare at them day in and day out.

I've always been of the belief that seeing these types of things written out on a repetitive basis just makes your brain tick different.

And my shower notes were the perfect example.

Years ago, doing $1M of ARR was a complete pipe dream.

Today, doing $1M of ARR means something went horribly wrong.

I'm extremely proud of this and urge you to write down your goals in a place you'll be forced to read them daily (shower, desk, phone background, etc.)

One of the most common replies you'll get to cold emails at scale is "how much does it cost".

Generally, you'll either:

A) Give the price. Without further context or sales tactics, people automatically see this as a cost and have a hard time justifying the ROI. This usually makes it harder to get on a call.

B) Give a range. This is a bit better, but depending on budget, it still may be hard to paint ROI via email. You need to give a fairly broad range.

Now, very few businesses selling >$1000 packages are public about pricing.

I think that should change.

Your pricing should be publicly available somewhere, ideally on a dedicated page that does a lot of the selling for you.

This might look like:

1. Landing page with 8-minute VSL, full of social proof, with pricing in the middle.

2. Static pricing page, full of social proof + process walkthrough.

This changes your reply from:

"Sure, our pricing is XYZ"

to

"Sure, feel free to have a look here [link] for more information on that".

This way, instead of your prospect just seeing the amount of money you want them to pay you, they get a much fuller picture of the value you provide.

Job titles are lying to you about who actually does the work. 

If you're selling something without a clean buyer title, your targeting is probably broken.

Here's how we fixed ours:

Outbound breaks down when your product is ambiguous. 

Say you sell financial forecasting software. 

Who owns forecasting depends on the company (Finance, FP&A, Operations, Strategy, or even founders, etc.).

A "Finance Manager" could handle AR, AP, Treasury, or actually build forecasts. You can't tell from the title.

So we stopped guessing titles and started targeting the actual work.

Layer 1: Department filtering

Start with departments where your problem sits. For forecasting: Finance, FP&A, Operations, Strategy.

Layer 2: LinkedIn description keywords

Every user writes a description under their title:

- "Own the quarterly forecast"
- "Build headcount forecasts"
- "Drive variance analysis"
- "Maintain the revenue model"

These keywords self-identify who does the work.

Instead of targeting "Finance Manager" and hoping, target "Finance Manager who mentions 'forecast' and 'financial model' in their description."

The process:

1. Pick 1-2 relevant departments
2. Extract 8-20 keywords tied to your product
3. Filter people mentioning those keywords in descriptions
4. Hit people who self-identify as doing the work

Example query:

Department: Finance/FP&A/Operations

Description contains: "forecast" OR "financial model" OR "budget"

This surfaces only people who explicitly manage forecasts.

We've been running this across ambiguous products and have seen both higher reply rates and better conversations.

If I were in charge of business development at a local blue collar business like this and needed to win jobs with cold email, I would:

1. Scrape a list of local businesses with an office location.
2. Write the following email copy:

—

[name], just wanted to touch base. We're an HVAC company in the area at [address].

Curious - do you have a go-to person for any kind of AC/heating repairs?

—

You might get a couple of jobs from this, but that is not really the goal with this kind of work.

The "magic" is what happens after.

3. Enroll all positive replies into a weekly nurture sequence (case studies and value).

Do this locally for 90-120 days.

It's the most surefire way to make sure that when a business' AC/heating breaks, they think of you right away.

Scaled to thousands of businesses across a major metro area, you're looking at serious pipeline.

Plus, a VERY small portion (if any) of your competitors are doing this.

To that point, if your business or someone you know would benefit from a system like this, comment or DM me!

The perfect cold email has:

- Relevance = Reason for reaching out.
- Personalization = Part that only makes sense to them.
- Offer = Outcome you'll provide.
- Social proof = Proof you've done it.
- CTA = Low-risk ask that puts the ball in their court.

Not complicated!

We've had clients we book 100s of meetings for per month, and others who churned because "cold email doesn't work".

The difference in how they operate:

Ones booking 100s of meetings:

- Willingly give away free value
- Take suggestions on optimizing offer
- Understand it's a volume game
- Don't overanalyze campaigns
- Chase leads we send them religiously

Ones who are convinced cold email doesn't work:

- Refuse to give away free value because it'll bring "bad leads".
- Refuse to optimize their offer to make it cold-ready.
- Want to send to a "targeted" list of 76 accounts.
- Analyze campaigns in relation to "industry standards" they Googled
- Let leads sit dormant for days and weeks after we submit them

It isn't exactly rocket science. This isn't to say we're perfect at what we do with every campaign.

It is to say we operate based on the data we have, and our data shows that this works.

We're doing 60,000 cold calls per month for clients and ourselves right now. Our number 1 learning for what converts to appointments and what doesn't has nothing to do with cold calling tech or set up.

It strictly has to do with the caller's tone.

One of the big pitfalls of outsourced callers is that they come into the call with no tonality.

Typical "Hey, do you have 10 seconds to speak? I'd love to show you how we could..."

Callers will sound robotic because you are grading them on the amount of dials they do per day. So, they speed-run through the list 

The much better play to run is:

1. Ensure your caller has a curious, inquisitive tone.
2. Ensure they don't get into the routine of sounding like a robot.

It sounds like a simple fix, but it's really not.

This is the difference between booking appointments from cold calling and wasting a ton of money.

How it feels when you realize you can just send more cold emails to get more leads:

We’re sending 260k cold emails Thursday-Sunday this week.

So many sellers view holidays and weekends as time to pause campaigns. I just don't see the point in doing this…mainly for a few reasons:

1. Because so many sellers pause their campaigns, inboxes are way less crowded.

2. Often, you’re targeting someone senior with outbound. Senior people, even though less on weekends, are more likely to check email (even once per day) during the holidays.

3. Generally, people are in more relaxed, friendly moods on a Thanksgiving Friday than they are on a random November Tuesday morning. This bodes well for reply rate.

Disclaimer:

You can expect ~50% of your typical campaign performance in terms of positive reply rate during the holidays. Yes it's reduced, but it's not worth stopping sending altogether.

TLDR: Don’t pause campaigns this holiday!

If I had to increase positive reply to meeting booked rate for any B2B business, here are the exact steps I'd take:

(1) Set up an automation that enriches positive replies with all relevant info (LI URL if I don't already have it, phone number, etc)

(2) Send them a LinkedIn connection request post-positive reply.

(3) Cold call them after that as well.

(4) If the meeting still isn't booked, I'd bump the cold email reply, mentioning I called and left a voicemail. Then, I’d follow up one more time after that.

(5) If they STILL haven't booked, I'd set up a weekly nurture newsletter for all prospects that fit this mould. Each email would have a CTA to book a call.

The point is that you reach them on all platforms.

If you need to set this up:

- Find out what data you have available after each list scrape.

- Set up waterfall enrichment to find what you’re missing after a positive reply (phone number, LI profile, etc.)

- Outline a process for you/your sellers to walk through post-positive reply.

- Use your CRM or beehiiv to set up a weekly newsletter nurture sequence (52 emails comprised of social proof + value).

The more you reach them, the better chance you have. It's not that difficult, but a lot of companies struggle with this.

- client with $100,000 LTV

Client: We only got 3 leads this month.

Me: And?

Client: We are going to have to churn.

Me: Why?

Client: We're clearly not getting enough volume for this to work.

Me: Ok, let's run the numbers. Your average LTV is $100,000 right?

Client: Yes.

Me: Okay, so, if we charge you $300 per lead, we can generate 100 leads that you close 0% on, and you'd STILL be at breakeven with us.

Client: Yeah, but we don't close at 0%. We close at 10-15%.

Me: Exactly. Let's even cut that in half and take 5%. If you pay us $300 per lead and close at 5%, you'd pay $6000 in lead generation costs for $100K in rev.

Client: Oh.

Me: Do you see why you don't need a lot of leads for this to work?

Client: Yes.

We have 60,000 monthly cold calls worth of data to show that prospects absolutely still pick up the phone.

Yet, still, deniers will say that it’s not worth their time, or that nobody picks up the phone, or my favorite: “When you pull the list, you’ll end up with office numbers and not personal ones!”.

(for the record: It is incredibly easy to pull personal mobile phone numbers from lead lists).

My point is that you absolutely shouldn’t listen to people who’ve never given a channel a fair shake about whether or not it works.

If you did:

1. You’d never send a DM because “inboxes are crowded”.
2. You’d never send a cold email because “it doesn’t work”.
3. You’d never make a cold call because “nobody picks up the phone”.

In reality, cold calling and quite literally all other channels “work” if executed correctly and for long enough.

Heading into 2026, outbound marketers will have to multi-thread more and more, meaning it’s likely going to be time to pick up the phone.

Just remember: It does work.

Roman Hipp

BetterContact

Co-Founder & Growth

Amazon

Business Development

charles

Business Analyst & Expansion

Moss | All-in-one spend management

Customer Success

BlackRock

Spring Week

Building BetterContact | Helping early-stage B2B SaaS companies with insights & ready-to-use templates

Currently building BetterContact, a B2B SaaS that aggregates various data sources to find and verify any email and mobile phone number.

Growth Co-Founder

🎉What a day! The Clay x BetterContact Christmas Party showed what makes this space special: great people, deep conversations, and shared ambition.

I’ve caught up with familiar faces, and had the pleasure to meet amazing new ones - can’t wait for the next time we all get together!

And honestly, it was no surprise the energy on Thursday was incredible.

The kind of magic that happens when 80+ passionate people in the GTM space meet over workflows (and mulled wine).

Huge thanks to Nicolas and Taimoor for organising this - and to David from Berlin Bytes for hosting us in such a great space!

Here’s to more conversations & more community in 2026!

Building BetterContact | Helping B2B companies win outbound through more and better contact data

In October, BetterContact reached sub-10% customer churn for the first time, after battling with >25% churn waves. While still not optimal, it’s one of my proudest moments since we launched 26 months ago.

The difficulty of this astronomically high churn was that we’d win a new customer, only to watch an existing one leave.

So we *needed* to make it our #1 priority - here’s what we did:

1. PARTNERSHIPS & INTEGRATIONS

Over the last months, we partnered with tons of great companies:

- Outreach tools (Instantly, Smartlead, Saleshandy, Lemlist, Reply, et al.)
- CRMs (Hubspot, Breakcold)
- No-code tools (Clay, Zapier, Make)
…and many more

As many already use these tools, a seamless integration with them allows for using our product more easily. 

And as we’re going where the user already is, it decreases friction & churn.

(there are many more exciting partnerships in the pipeline!)

2. STRONGER PRODUCT

We didn’t only add 10+ new data providers, but also invested a lot in:

- Mobile phone verification, including geo-/name matching & activity scoring
- BetterAI, our algorithm to find the best provider sequence based on lead characteristics
- Stronger infrastructure & error handling capabilities, leading to better uptimes & enrichment times 
- Country-specific improvements to deliver better data to specific markets

We’ve seen a lot of users that rigidly compared our data with other solutions, and became customers after.

3. CO-MARKETING & EVENTS

Partnering & doing cool stuff together with brands our users already love drives a lot of brand advocacy - also, I’ve met a lot of great people in the space through that.

I can’t wait for our first ‘real-world’ get together at the Clay x BetterContact GTM Christmas Party in Berlin on 4th December! 

Our next big goal is approaching 5% churn - tough challenge in this market, but there’s a few things around the corner that make us confident to get there soon!

I was convinced we’d already tested every good contact data provider - but last week, one of our top customers challenged us to test one  we didn't know yet for the BetterContact waterfall

After testing their data thoroughly, the provider was able to add 0,4% valid numbers to our mobile phone finder waterfall.

Considering we already have 20+ providers in the mix, it was quite a pleasant surprise!

(good reminder to listen to your customers!)

So apparently, hidden gems still exist… and now we want more, to help us squeeze out every last % of valid data.

That's why we're putting out a bounty of $1k for everyone that points us to a data provider that adds to our current valid output by at least 0.5%, and which we will ultimately make part of our waterfall - please reach out! 👇

Last month, I spoke to an European agency owner who just hired 3 cold callers but is having trouble scaling cold calling with traditional data vendors (or ‘their existing setup with Zoominfo/Apollo’). Here’s what their problem is:

1. They use a mix of Apollo and ZoomInfo. Their connect rates are <7%. As they pay their cold callers a decent hourly base wage, the time it takes them to dial the 90% non-connecting numbers leads to significant fixed costs + low productivity.

2. Their cost on data is exploding. They average $0,3/enriched number - which is not bad. However, their cost/connect is at +$3 (due to unusable numbers). This discrepancy & the resulting ‘hidden costs’ are driving them nuts.

3. As Apollo/ZI are US providers, they often get +1 (US) numbers for their European leads, which they can’t call due to high fees (and it's not the right person anyways). This adds another layer of costs for unusable data.

Here’s how we helped them solve it:

1. We do proper activity scoring, which analyzes if the number has been recently active and picked up calls. If not, we don’t push it back and treat it as invalid.

2. As they’re an outbound agency, we put them on an agency plan, so 30% discounted ($0,28/verified number). This allows for good margins, as providers such as Lusha ($0,9/number) or Kaspr ($0,5) are not feasible at scale.

3. We conduct line type & geography checks, making sure that the number’s country code actually matches where the lead is localized.

They have just been with us for a months already & here are some stats they shared:

1. Connect rates average 19%. Their callers are now able to do more than double the conversations they were able to do before. This does not only lead to more booked demos, but just happier callers in general.

2. As they are on agency pricing, they average $0,28/enriched number. Considering their connect rates, their cost/connect decreased by ~60%.

3. Their non-EU dials (+1 etc.) for their European-only leads were driven to near 0 (we’re working on eliminating that completely).

What is your cold calling stack?

🎄Only 8 more days to go until the Clay x BetterContact GTM Christmas Party in Berlin, can't wait to see you there! (link to sign up below)

🎄Only 14 more days to go until the Clay x BetterContact GTM Christmas Party in Berlin, can't wait to see you there!

View event: Clay x BetterContact GTM Christmas Party (Berlin)

Clay x BetterContact GTM Christmas Party (Berlin)

Thu, Dec 4, 9:00 PM - Fri, Dec 5, 1:00 AM GST

The reason why most outbound campaigns fail is that they are built in the Red Ocean: targeting the exact same leads everyone else does. The Blue Ocean is where teams win these days.

Here’s why: legacy providers like Apollo, Zoominfo & Lusha only cover 30–60% of your TAM.

(i.e. you'll only get 30-60% valid emails & mobile numbers)

Means what?

Literally everyone else, including your competitors, gets the access to the same 30-60% of your TAM. So you end up competing with EVERYONE for the attention of the exact same leads.

Meanwhile, there's the Blue Ocean.

In outbound, 'Blue Ocean' doesn't have to mean a new, bigger market.

It can simply mean covering 20-30% more of your existing TAM, and going after the 'untouched' leads almost no competitors can find.

It’s the same market you already target, just the part no one else can reach.

At BetterContact, by working with 20+ data providers, we've built the tech to find, score, and verify contact data others miss (25–30% 'untouched leads').

This gives you bigger TAM coverage, higher connect rates and better results... Without ever diluting your ICP (the greatest sin of outbound).

Outbound isn’t broken. You're just fishing where everyone else is fishing too.

You can…

🩸 Keep fighting for 'leftovers' in the Red Ocean
💧 Or swim in the Blue Ocean, where others can’t

The 'outbound death zone' is probably the reason why most companies doing cold outreach shine at first, but fail miserably after & say 'outbound is dead' 

To better explain what I mean, here’s a real breakdown of the figures for a unicorn company that came dangerously close to getting stuck there:

𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐋𝐄𝐌

They used a mix of Apollo & ZoomInfo to break into the European market. High ACV, small TAM.

Their list building/lead sourcing process is rock solid and is based on 1st party intent data.

However, using Apollo and ZoomInfo, they found less than half of valid mobile numbers of these prospects for their sales teams.

This pretty quickly placed them in the middle of the ‘outbound death zone’ process: ICP dilution

As they did not have enough dials for their sales team anymore, and in order to hit quota, they were forced to also prospect leads which were not exactly matching what they initially agreed on as ICP.

Here are their numbers for a recent micro cold calling campaign they did:

Total dials: 1400
Conversations: 217
-> connect rate: 15.5%

Meetings scheduled: 17
Closed Won/Lost: (no data yet)

The problem is that the initial list that they built had around 3.000 leads.

So they were not even able to reach half of their list.  

𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐔𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍

So here’s how we helped them to solve it:

The big goal was TAM maximization.

We ran the 1.600 non-reachable through BetterContact, and found additional 750 verified mobile numbers, so 25% extra to their previous enrichments with Apollo and ZI (totals to 72% found) .

Extra dials: 750
Conversations: 174
-> connect rate: 23.2% 

Meetings scheduled: 15 
Closed Won/Lost: (no data yet)

𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐔𝐋𝐓𝐒

Just by using BC, they had an additional 174 actual conversations with their ICP, and 15 additional meetings booked.

Looking at their high-five figure ACV, we’re looking at an additional ~$750k in high-quality pipeline.

Considering previous campaigns they ran, and their meeting-to-closed won ratio, they will most likely hit their target for this micro campaign. All because they squeezed out that 25% extra reachable ICP coverage.

taplio

The Battle

Nick Abraham

Roman Hipp

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreNick Abraham's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRoman Hipp's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Nick Abraham

Roman Hipp

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Nick Abraham's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRoman Hipp's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreNick Abraham's LinkedIn Performance