Getting Senior Leaders to Optimal Performance and Sustainable Growth Without Burnout

You’re capable, experienced, and used to handling pressure. Yet certain moments quietly destabilise even strong leaders.
► When you step into a new role and realise the rules have changed
► When a restructuring, missed promotion, or sudden shift knocks confidence more than you admit
► When performance still looks “fine”, but decision-making feels heavier and slower than it should

These moments don’t look dramatic from the outside. 
They look like coping.

And this is where many leaders hesitate —
waiting for clarity to return on its own,
until the cost shows up as loss of judgment, credibility, or energy.

👉 This is where my work begins.
I partner with senior leaders and leadership teams during high-stakes transitions — where clarity, authority, and direction matter more than speed.

My clients typically come to this point when they need to:

✔️ Make clear, grounded decisions under pressure 
✔️ Re-establish authority and presence in a new or changing role 
✔️ Navigate career transitions or restructuring without loss of momentum 
✔️ Lead teams through complexity, transformation, or sustained change 
✔️ Perform at a high level without sacrificing health, focus, or integrity

I bring 17+ years of experience from Fortune 500 organisations (P&G, General Mills, GSK, Syngenta), combined with professional executive coaching and mentoring (ICF PCC, EMCC SP). 

I understand the realities of senior leadership — competing priorities, political complexity, and the expectation to “hold it together” while everything shifts.

My clients often describe the biggest shift not as improved performance alone — but as clearer thinking, steadier confidence, and the ability to lead without constantly operating in reactive mode.

If you’re navigating a meaningful transition — whether you’re still in role or between chapters — and sense that waiting is no longer the right strategy, you’re welcome to message me here on LinkedIn to explore whether working together makes sense.

— 
🌐 tatianarueff.com 
📩 tatiana@tatianarueff.com 

For organisations, I also design and deliver senior leadership workshops and keynotes on leading through high-stakes transitions — enabling sustainable performance, clarity, and resilience under pressure.

Tatiana Rueff

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐜𝐭.

Most of the leaders I work with aren’t stuck 
because they are not thinking enough.

They see what’s no longer working.
They understand the implications.
They have ideas to test.
They’ve thought it through - repeatedly.

What’s missing isn’t insight.

It’s a space where clarity turns into decisions,
and decisions turn into movement -
without rushing, proving, or forcing outcomes.

Some moments don’t need more effort.
They need the right kind of containment.

P.S. If something you’ve been circling feels ready to be addressed, this is the kind of transition that benefits from the right container.

Partnering with Leaders through High-Stakes Transitions | Clear Decisions & Sustainable Growth under Pressure | Executive & Leadership Transition Coach (ICF PCC) | Ex-Fortune 500

Tatiana Rueff, Executive and Leadership Transition Coach, standing in a snowy mountain village, looking calmly at the camera, with alpine houses and snow-covered peaks (Mont Blanc) behind her on a clear winter day.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞.

Between roles many leaders feel an invisible clock ticking.

They don’t want to rush.
They don’t want to repeat old patterns.
But they also don’t want to get stuck.

So they stay busy instead.

Networking.
Thinking.
Sending applications daily.
Scrolling LinkedIn.

Yet the discomfort isn’t really about time.
It’s about not having enough structure for the transition.

Without that, even thoughtful leaders start doubting themselves.

This is where transitions quietly stretch longer than necessary -
not because skills are missing,
but because support is.

P.S. Being between chapters isn’t a gap to fill. 
It’s a phase to take seriously.

A quiet home office with a wooden desk by a window, a beige leather chair slightly pulled back, an open laptop displaying emails, a notebook and pen, a coffee mug, and a digital clock showing 13:30, suggesting a paused workday and time passing.

𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞.
𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐚𝐧.

And waiting won’t make it calmer.

Many people are waiting.

Waiting for the market to improve.
Waiting for work to slow down.
Waiting for life to feel easier before they finally breathe again.

They hope the waters will calm.

But life is rarely a quiet lake.
Most of the time, it’s a wavy ocean - 
unpredictable, demanding, alive.

And while you’re waiting for perfect conditions,
your life is still passing by.

Sustainable growth doesn’t come from hoping the waves disappear.
It comes from learning how to surf.

From building balance, clarity, and resilience 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 you -
so you can navigate change without burning out
and even enjoy the ride.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦.
𝐖𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐢𝐬.

P.S. Where in your life are you still waiting for “better times”?

Guiding Senior Leaders & Teams Through Transitions | From Pressure to Clarity, Confidence & Sustainable Growth | Executive & Leadership Transition Coach (ICF PCC) | Ex-Fortune 500

A split image contrasting two approaches to challenge: on the left, a person stands at the edge of a turbulent ocean, watching the waves; on the right, a surfer actively rides a large wave, moving with strength and balance.

𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐱𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 
𝐈𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.

Many senior leaders don’t collapse.
They continue performing.

What changes first is something quieter.

Decisions take longer.
Recovery takes more effort.
Quality thinking time disappears.
Weekends bring more screen time than joy.

They tell themselves it’s temporary.
That pressure comes with the role.

Sometimes that’s true.
Often it’s a signal.

Sustainable growth isn’t about pushing less.
It’s about noticing when the cost is no longer worth the output.

That moment is easy to rationalise away -
until it forces a decision later, 
under worse conditions.

P.S. If the price of “doing well” has been rising for a while, it might be asking for your attention now.

Tatiana Rueff, executive and leadership transition coaching, seated on a wooden balcony overlooking snow-covered mountains and alpine houses, appearing thoughtful and composed in a calm winter setting.

𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚
𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞.

Scroll through LinkedIn on any given day and you’ll see it.

New role announcements.
Promotions.
Bigger titles.
Public celebrations of progress.

Most people could make these updates invisible - 
but they don’t.

Because being seen, acknowledged, and validated matters.
That’s human.

What we don’t talk about enough is the other side of those posts.

The quiet comparison they trigger in leaders who are already carrying a lot.

𝘈𝘮 𝘐 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥?
𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘢𝘮 𝘐 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘵?
𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘐 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘱 l𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦?
𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘮𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦?

These questions don’t stop early in a career.

I hear them from VPs, CEOs, and founders -
especially in moments of transition.

The problem isn’t ambition.

The problem is the false idea that there’s a universal success ladder we’re supposed to follow.

There isn’t.

Careers are not straight lines.
They pause, accelerate, reset, and sometimes fall apart - 
often for reasons far beyond effort or talent.

When you measure yourself against someone else’s highlight reel, you risk seeing personal failure where there is none.

You’re not late.
You’re not early.

You are where your life has brought you - 
and you still get to decide what comes next.

𝐏.𝐒.  Which “should” have you been carrying that no longer serves you?

Man lying in bed at night looking at his phone, reflecting on social media comparison and career self-doubt.

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 
𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧.

It’s not because you’re unprepared.
Or lacking confidence.
Or suddenly less capable.

It’s because you’re stepping into a system that already exists -
with unspoken expectations, inherited dynamics, 
and histories you didn’t create.

You’re being read before you fully understand the context.
Your decisions matter before you’ve had time to see the full picture.

And the pressure to “add value quickly” is constant, 
even when no one says it out loud.

Most leaders respond by accelerating.

They work harder.
They say yes more often.
They try to prove themselves early.

But early overcompensation is how misalignment starts.

The leaders who land well do something different.

They slow their thinking before they speed up their actions.
They take time to understand what’s really being asked of them, 
not just what’s written.

They decide what not to change yet.

This isn’t about confidence.
It’s about orientation.

The first moves you make set patterns that last far longer than people expect.

P.S. If you’re stepping into something new and feel the pressure to get it “right” quickly, that’s not a flaw. It’s the moment.

A professional woman stands by a large window overlooking a lake and mountains, reflecting quietly before stepping into a new role.

𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬.
Very few talked about what that reaction reveals about leadership.

When Emmanuel Macron wore sunglasses indoors at Davos, 
the world listened - and still speculated.

And this is the interesting part:
an explanation had already been given.

It was presented as a benign eye issue -
nothing strategic, nothing symbolic.

Still -

Memes spread.
Commentary escalated.
The company behind the sunglasses saw its share price jump 28%.

Not because eyewear matters -
but because when a leader breaks an unspoken norm, 
explanation alone doesn’t stop interpretation.

This happens inside organisations every day.

A leader goes quiet.
Delays a decision.
Shows up differently than expected.

Even when there is a rational reason,
the system keeps reading signals.

Stories fill the gap:

– “Something’s off.”
– “A restructuring is coming.”
– “There must be more going on.”

The real risk for leaders isn’t deviation.
It’s assuming clarity has been received just because it was provided.

Strong leadership isn’t about over-explaining.

It’s about recognising when perception has momentum -
and choosing whether to actively frame it, hold it, or redirect it.

Because whether you intend it or not,
people are always reading the signals.

PS: Where have you seen a small, unintended leadership signal take on disproportionate meaning?

A pair of blue-tinted aviator sunglasses on a light background.

𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬.

Many leaders value reflection.

They think deeply.
They notice patterns.
They see what’s no longer working.

And then… they wait.

They tell themselves they’re “not ready yet”.
That they need a bit more time.
That there’s something urgent to take care of first.
That they’ll figure it out.

But insight has a shelf life.

What starts as awareness slowly turns into friction.
The same questions resurface.
The same tension returns, just louder.

At some point, not acting costs more than acting.

The tricky part is that nothing breaks immediately.

You keep functioning.
You keep thinking about it.
You keep living your life.

But over time, the cost shows up elsewhere -
in energy, focus, and the quality of decisions.

That’s when waiting stops being a pause
and starts shaping the outcome.

P.S. If something has been unaddressed for a while, this might be the moment it’s asking for a different response from you.

A man at a home office desk looks at an hourglass as time passes, reflecting on decisions and waiting.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 90 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐝𝐥𝐲.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐭.

Most leaders prepare hard for interviews.
Very few prepare for what comes after.

They step into a role already moving.
With inherited dynamics they didn’t design.
And expectations that aren’t fully spoken.

So they compensate early.

They try to add value fast.
They change things quickly.

And sometimes… 
they lock in patterns they later have to undo.

The leaders who land well don’t rush alignment.
They create space to think before they accelerate action.

That window is brief.
And often underestimated.

P.S. If you’ve recently stepped into a new role and feel the pressure to move fast, this is the moment I help leaders slow their thinking before their actions lock in.
You don’t need to navigate it alone.

A silhouetted man standing indoors by a window, looking out at blurred car lights moving quickly through the night, suggesting contrast between stillness and speed.

𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞.

Many senior leaders look like they’re doing fine.

They deliver.
They show up.
They keep things moving.

But privately, the cost is rising.

More effort to stay focused.
More recovery time after non-stop meetings.
Less space to think clearly.

They tell themselves:

“𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘦.”
“𝘐 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴.”
“𝘖𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦.”

High performance can mask misalignment for a long time.

Until one day, the question shifts from

“𝘊𝘢𝘯 𝘐 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴?”
to
“𝘋𝘰 𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘺?”

That’s not weakness.
That’s information.

P.S. Where has “pushing through” quietly become your default?

𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬. 
Poor positioning is.

Most senior leaders don’t struggle because transitions take too long.
They struggle because they stay too broad for too long.

Time itself isn’t the problem.
Ambiguity is.

When your message sounds like:

“𝘐’𝘮 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯.”
“𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴.”
“𝘐’𝘮 𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦.”

You make it harder for others to place you -
and easier for the wrong opportunities to absorb your energy.

At senior level, clarity isn’t a constraint.
It’s a service.

The leaders who land well don’t rush.
They narrow deliberately - often with support - 
long before urgency starts making decisions for them.

The right support doesn’t just protect the outcome.

It sharpens positioning 
and that’s what changes the timeline.

If this resonates, you’re already thinking at the right level.

A narrow mountain path running along a green ridge under a clear blue sky, with steep slopes on both sides, symbolising focus and deliberate career progress.

𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐬. 
𝐈𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐝𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬. 

When an organisation goes through transition - 
a leadership change, restructuring, strategy shift - 
the impact isn’t limited to roles or org charts. 

Team dynamics change first. 

What I often observe is not open resistance, but subtle shifts: 

– Decision-making slows 
– Ownership becomes blurred 
– Informal leaders go quiet 
– High performers start self-protecting 

On the surface, work continues. 
Underneath, alignment erodes. 

This isn’t a people problem. 
It’s a leadership transition problem. 

Teams need clarity on: 

– what still matters 
– what has changed 
– where decisions now sit 
– and what “good performance” looks like in the new context 

Without that, leaders spend months compensating with more meetings, more pressure, and more effort - 
often burning out their best people in the process. 

Sustainable leadership in transition isn’t about pushing harder. 
It’s about stabilising the system so people can perform again. 

That’s the work I do with leaders and organisations navigating change.

An empty leadership meeting room in a modern office with panoramic views over Zurich, representing organisational transition, decision-making, and the need for leadership clarity.

𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭.

They notice when something starts to feel off.
When the role demands more than it gives back.
When effort increases but clarity doesn’t.

What’s harder is knowing how to respond in that moment.

Do you pause and think it through alone?
Do you give it time, hoping the pressure will ease?
Do you reach for an external perspective or structured support early enough?

I see very capable leaders make very different choices at this point.

And those choices quietly shape how long transitions last and how costly they become.

I’m curious what tends to be true for you in practice, not in theory.

When you realise something in your career is no longer sustainable, what do you tend to do first?

The author can see how you vote. Learn more

Project Manager | University Lecturer | Hospitality-Bred Leader | AI-Enthusiast | Digital Transformation

You’re looking at someone who builds teams that work well together.
Team excellence is where I'm strongest. Clearer communication, smoother execution, less noise on a Monday. 

I work across education, software, hospitality tech, innovation, AI, and creative ecosystems. 
Also an Educator in Business & Hospitality Management and the voice behind /talksbypete on LinkedIn.

Creator and host on TWISTCAT, a conversation-driven podcast exploring work, leadership, and the human patterns behind high-performing teams. 
It's become the place where I explore the human side of work - the habits that push people forward and the ones that quietly slow them down. 

I like designing systems that feel lighter: processes people want to follow, projects that move without (excessive) chaos, and teams that grow without burning out. 

My background blends delivery with teaching. I talk about leadership, emotional intelligence, and strategy. And I apply the same thinking every day in fast-moving environments. 

What matters to me: 

🔹 Clarity over control
🔹 Team excellence over pressure
🔹 Creativity over rigid checklists
🔹 Helping people and systems grow together.

Based in the UAE, open to global opportunities, and always up for conversations where tech meets people - and good ideas finally move! 

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈. 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒌, 𝒘𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆.

Petar Krstic

Some transitions arrive unannounced. 
This one landed on my desk a few days ago. 

In unpredictable environments like Dubai, companies expand, shrink, pause, or recalibrate constantly.
Roles change. Structures shift.
And sometimes good people get caught in the middle.

Still, not considering it as a setback.
More like a moment to pause, reset, and reposition. 

So yes - I'm open to new opportunities 🙂
Open, curious, and very clear about the value I bring.

If you're navigating something similar, you're not behind.
You're just adapting in real time. 

I’d appreciate your support in resharing this and helping me find the next chapter ✨

Team Excellence | Project Manager | Educator | UAE #3 in PM & EQ | AI-Enthusiast

𝟓,𝟎𝟎𝟎.
And a lot of good conversations! ✨

I've been on LinkedIn for almost 10 years. 
But I only started creating content actively in April 2025. 

No big plan. 
Just sharing thoughts, work insights, and real convos - mainly for learning and discussion. 

What surprised me was meeting so many sharp, thoughtful, grounded minds here.

This never felt like building an audience.
More like finding a space where honest thinking is welcome. 

So thank you, truly! 
For the exchanges, the trust, the different perspectives, the quiet support. 

Still learning. 
Still perfectly imperfect. 

And genuinely glad you're here ✨

Favikon wrote a 2025 wrap-up article - and I smiled (again) 🙂
My '𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭' approach?
It's the reason teams, clients, people stick around. 👇🏼

Honestly, people usually stay with me for a long time - and often come back too.
(Pardon, modesty should not be a virtue these days).

Is that difficult to achieve?
𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐀𝐓 𝐀𝐋𝐋!

I'll be open and share the main reason here.
From early in my career, I've chosen to be an accessible and approachable person. 
And that (mainly) built initial trust in 99% of situations. 

In my work, I have strong PM, leadership, and academic foundations.
I 𝑐𝑎𝑛 speak in technical jargon.
I 𝑐𝑎𝑛 write in polished, professional terminology.

𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐈 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭.

I choose to keep my work (and life) simple, human, and grounded.
Natural conversations.
Clear thinking.
Direct language that people actually understand.

Whether I'm working with teams, clients, students, or people in my personal life, I try to show up the same way.
Approachable.
Honest.
Perfectly Imperfect.

That's probably my real edge.
And maybe my biggest treasure.

Let me close it simply - I love the rhythm of my own beat.
And others seem to love it, too! 🙂

Let's keep going, thank you all for sharing trust ✨

---
Credits: Favikon.com (article reference). Visual adapted for context. 
Source: https://lnkd.in/dCwu_iwc
Accessed: 21st January 2026

Your team does things differently? Embrace it.
Delegation should feel a little risky!

Delegation gets uncomfortable the moment you realize one thing:
The work will probably be done differently than you'd do it.

And that's usually when micromanagement sneaks in.
Not because people can't deliver, but because letting go feels risky.

Most of us built our standards through experience, pressure, and mistakes.
Handing that over isn't easy.

But when you keep stepping in to fix everything, something subtle happens.
People stop stretching, and growth definitely slows down.

We shouldn't consider delegation as lowering expectations.
More like giving others the space to learn how to meet them. 🏆

Is it safer to build a business or become irreplaceable at your job?

Lately, I keep hearing the same question:
Should I start my own business - or just get really, really good at what I do?

One gets talked about as freedom.
The other as playing it safe.

But honestly, both take work and come with risk. 

I’ve seen people grow by going solo.
I’ve also seen people become so valuable inside a team that everything around them starts to change.

What are you building right now - something of your own, or yourself, where you are? 💡

Drop your work type here as well, let it be a discussion! 😉

When does thinking become OVERthinking?
A question I've been pondering.

We’re often told to stop overthinking.
But does the right amount in practice actually help?

Overthinking is usually framed as the enemy of progress - it slows decisions and creates hesitation.

At the same time, some of the cleanest outcomes come from people who pause, question, and replay scenarios before moving.

In practice, both patterns exist.
Too much thinking can stall action.
Too little can lead to rushed decisions that need fixing later.

The line between reflection and delay isn’t always obvious.
And it doesn’t look the same in every situation.

I've found that setting a time limit for decision-making helps.
It forces me to focus without getting lost in endless what-ifs.

What strategies do you use to balance thoughtful consideration with decisive action?

Unanswered messages, attention slipping.
Small things - big team problems?

Most workplace issues don't show up as obvious red flags.
They start slowly, and also very EASY to ignore or brush off.

A message left unanswered.
A meeting where attention drifts.
A decision rushed because slowing down feels uncomfortable.

Individually, none of this feels serious.
In practice, it shapes how people feel over time.

I've noticed teams rarely break because of one bad moment.
They move when small signals keep saying, this doesn't really matter.

Strategy is important, correct.
But consistency in the small moments often decides whether things actually work.

That's what happens when small things add up.
Like a leaky faucet, drip by drip.
Eventually, you're dealing with water damage.

Where have you seen small habits actually shape a team - for better or worse?

"Go with the flow" vs. early clarity: Can they coexist?

We’re told to move with the flow.
At the same time, we’re told to get clarity early.
Do those two always sit well together?

I’m actually a big supporter of moving with the flow.
Waiting until everything feels clear usually means waiting too long.

But I’ve also seen “flow” somehow replace decisions that never happened.
Priorities stay unclear.
Responsibilities stay loose.
And people keep adjusting instead of deciding.

Moving with the flow works when there’s a direction in mind.
Without that, it just turns into motion without progress.

Is early clarity actually just the right starting direction?

People first, then the work.
Sounds simple, rarely practiced.
Why?

In this episode with Ahmad Al Araj, we dive deep.
We talk about what actually breaks projects under pressure.

It’s usually not tools or plans.
It’s lack of clarity.
It’s broken trust.
It’s leaders trying to push execution without first leading people.

We unpack the quiet side of project leadership:
Listening more.
Simplifying decisions.
Building trust before demanding results.

It's about understanding that projects aren't just tasks.
They're about people.
And when people are understood, the work flows.

The full episode of TWISTCAST is now live.
Link in the first comment.

Lots of communication tools lean too hard on theory and performance.
This one doesn't - and that's because of 𝐖𝐇𝐎 built it!

I recently tried a communication assessment created by Marina (LDynamics) and Christos (InterAct Globally).

This blend is such 🏆
I was blown away by how clearly the questions pointed to where things actually break under pressure.

I also loved that it doesn't try to fix everything at once.
It helps you see what to focus on first, instead of guessing.

Marina brings clarity and structure.
Christos brings presence and delivery.

And together?
It's so balanced, practical, and grounded in real situations!

If you've ever felt your message land weaker than it should, this is worth a look!

I will drop their profiles and link to the assessment in the comments.
Don't miss it! 💡

No checklist, no certainty: why leadership is so uncomfortable (and necessary). 🎙️

Execution feels safe.
You can track it. Measure it. Explain it.

Leadership doesn’t give you that comfort.
There’s no checklist. No certainty.
No clear permission slip.

That’s why so many strong project managers stay in execution longer than they should.
Leading means being exposed.
Stepping into something before you feel ready, before anyone tells you it’s okay.

And that discomfort?
That’s usually the work.

What part of leadership makes you most uncomfortable?

No matter the system you’re in, there’s only one thing you truly control - 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟. 

... that line from Rochelle Trow stayed with me.
Because we spend so much time trying to change environments, rules, and structures - and very little time looking at how we show up inside them.

In our latest TWISTCAST episode, we dove deep.
We unpacked leadership, identity, and the quiet cost of success.
It's a conversation about staying true to yourself amidst external pressures.

And this is exactly what her upcoming book 𝐴𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 speaks to.
Not escaping the system.
Not fighting it.
But staying grounded enough not to lose yourself while moving through it.

𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐍 𝐒𝐔𝐂𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐒 𝐘𝐎𝐔
The full TWISTCAST conversation is now live.
I’m eager to hear your thoughts. 🎙️

Control creates speed, but shrinks trust.
Is balance key in successful environments? 
That's one of many other valuable topics we touched on at Sapna's Creator IRL show! 

Control can feel efficient.
It creates speed.
But it often shrinks trust, ownership, and thinking.

The same tension shows up with AI.
Not everything intelligent should decide for us.
Some things should simply clear space.
So judgment can breathe.

Leadership still comes down to clarity, trust, and restraint.
Even as technology accelerates.

Grateful for the conversation, Sapna ✨

🎙️ Podcast Host – Creator IRL | Marketing Head@Artha Job Board | Building Brand beyond B2B and B2C barriers| Content/Copy Writer

How many of you think AI just means ChatGPT?

You’re wondering why you still need to "learn AI" or 
What its real impact will be on your career, 

This episode has all the answers, but it’s about way more than just tech.
We’re live! Tune in to hear:
☑️Why resisting AI today is like using a paper map in a GPS world.
☑️How AI clears your "mental desk" so you can finally double down on being human.
☑️And why micromanagement still quietly holds teams back.

Go and watch now, and let me know your thoughts

https://lnkd.in/gjXmdPzK

Open video: Micromanagement, Creativity and AI. Rethinking Modern Leadership | Creator IRL on youtu.be

Micromanagement, Creativity and AI. Rethinking Modern Leadership | Creator IRL

taplio

The Battle

Tatiana Rueff

Petar Krstic

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScorePetar Krstic's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Tatiana Rueff

Petar Krstic

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScorePetar Krstic's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance