Ryan Staley

Whale Boss

A New Era of Revenue Leadership with AI 

Our mission is to empower 1 million Go-To-Market Executives to achieve superhuman potential through AI transformation. We help revenue leaders escape the operational grind, multiply team capacity, and accelerate revenue—all while working less and achieving more.  This can be done in less than 2 months with AI education activation, innovation and automation. 

🚀 AI as “Liberating Intelligence”
AI isn’t just a tool; it’s “liberating intelligence.” This shift redefines productivity, ambition, and control, enabling leaders and teams to reach impact levels once unimaginable—all without expanding headcount. This approach resonates with executives who seek freedom in both business and life, making AI a true transformational ally.

🔹 From Productivity to “Capacity Multiplication”
Today’s leaders don’t need mere productivity boosts; they need to multiply team capacity. AI agents, workflows, and assistants go beyond task completion, amplifying output so teams perform at peak levels without constant oversight—giving leaders time for moves that truly matter.

🌄 Liberating Leaders to Live the Dream, Not Chase It
With AI, revenue leaders can grow without the endless grind. Freed from perpetual hiring and micromanagement, you gain the power to step back, letting a self-sustaining revenue engine deliver results while you live the life you envision.

💡 AI for “Decision Density”: Minimize Decisions, Maximize Impact
AI reduces the mental load by taking on real-time tactical choices, freeing leaders to focus on fewer, high-impact decisions. It turns decision-making from a draining process into strategic momentum.

I’m passionate about helping revenue leaders not just transform their teams but redefine growth itself. 

Together, we’re building a future where AI isn’t just helpful—it’s liberating.

Founder and CEO

The Scale Up Show

I deconstruct how the top SAAS CEOs in the world grow their companies repeatedly and predictably.  

This show has featured Startup and Billion Dollar Founders, Best Selling Authors, and the World’s Top Sales and Marketing Experts like Terry Jones (Founder of Travelocity and Chairman of Kayak),  Andrew Gazdecki (Founder of Microacquire), Harpaul Sambhi (Founder of Magical with a previous exit to Linkedin) and many more.

Podcast Host

Gartner

Gartner Peer Community is Gartner's new, next-generation online destination designed to increase value through timely answers and meaningful peer connections.

Ryan Staley has been invited as a Founding Peer Community Ambassador to contribute insights on B2B sales, sales leadership, and enterprise go-to-market among other topics. Gartner Peer Community is Gartner's new, next-generation online destination designed to increase value through timely answers and meaningful peer connections. 

Ryan Staley has been invited as a Founding Peer Community Ambassador to contribute insights on B2B sales, AI for Sales, sales leadership, and enterprise go-to-market among other topics.

Peer Ambassador: B2B Sales, Sales Leadership & Enterprise GTM

Pavilion

As an instructor, I have taught over 800 VPs of Sales and CROs my proprietary methods for Enterprise Sales and Enterprise GTM.  

Pavilion is a private, invitation-only community of sales and marketing executives at growth-focused companies.

Executive Member,  Former CRO & Enterprise Sales GTM School Lecturer

RevGenius

RevGenius is a think tank networking group of revenue-generating sales and marketing professionals brought together to learn, share, support, and grow with each other. You can consider us your alt work family!

Founding Member

Sales Hacker, Inc.

Flex Technology Group

Specific examples of value delivered for net new customers listed below;

-Leading Retail Company ($15 billion in annual revenue)-$3.6 Million in expense reduction over the life of contract, 15 FTE's freed up for core IT initiatives and 300% improvement in SLA's

-High Growth Manufacturer ($9 Billion in annual revenue)-$1.8 Million in expense reduction over the life of contract, 300% improvement in SLA's and 15 vendors consolidated into 1.

-Leading National Healthcare Provider ($2.5 Billion in annual revenue)- $3.6 Million in expense reduction over the life of contract, SLA improvement of 400% and  Co-authored enhanced asset management strategy

-Top Professional Services Organization ($3 Billion in annual revenue)- 60% expense reduction, SLA improvement of 300% and asset management visibility provided across 900 locations

Vice President of Strategic Accounts

Director of Strategic Accounts

Director of Sales, Midwest Region

Regional Sales Manager

Pitney Bowes (Managed Services)

Managed Print Services Enterprise Sales (Midwest Region) for Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 organizations.

Senior Sales Consultant

Antenna Software

Antenna is a high growth early stage Software company that provides a SaaS based applications and mobility platforms that allow Fortune 500 companies to mobilize their enterprise applications.

• Responsible for Direct and Channel Sales for the Region
• Developed new Partner/Customer relationships for an
   undeveloped territory

Director of Sales Midwest Region

Sold customized Managed Print Services and software solutions to Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 C-level executives. 

• President's Club Winner 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007
• Grew a new market that had no customers into the one of
   the most profitable sales markets.

I help Chief Revenue Officers & Sales Professionals Leverage AI to work 10 hours less weekly and 2x performance. Follow for cutting-edge cheat codes, prompts, and workflows🎙Scale Up Show Host🔥$0→$30M ARR in 5.5 yrs

Over the last decade, I’ve grown a division from 0-$30M ARR with 4 Sales People and have upskilled over 1,600 GTM executives on AI, Enterprise Sales and GTM Strategy  .

My mission is to inspire 1 million Go To Market Executives to work less and sell more through becoming Superhuman with Artificial Intelligence.

I help revenue leaders transform their teams by acquiring AI skills to escape the operational grind, and accelerate topline revenue.

I’m the founder of Whale Boss and The Scale Up Show.

My portfolio:

→ I’m the Founder of Whale Boss, an AI Sales & Marketing consulting and skill transformation company
→ I’m the Founder of the Scale Up Show, Top 1% Global Podcast
→ I teach Executives, Sales & Marketing teams to implement tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, etc.   
→ I provide Chief AI Officer Advisory services for human capital.  


My results:

→0-$30M without funding, marketing or SDRs with only 4 Sales people
→Identified and implemented over 500 AI use cases (internally and externally)
→Taught over 800 CROs proprietary selling strategy and tactical execution
→Consulted over 40 Technology companies on custom revenue growth strategies.  
→Voted as a TOP global AI thought leader, Gartner Ambassador & Sales Assembly thought leader. 


If you want to learn more on how to become Superhuman, you can join my newsletter.
⇒ https://superhumanrevenue.beehiiv.com/


If you want to explore AI skill transformation for your organization or Team, apply for an AI Consult.  
=> https://calendly.com/ryanstaleywss/introductory-call-with-ryan-staley-from-whale-boss


Youtube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFGndSHN4KkE89kUP74U7Qg

Podcast-https://ryanstaley.io/podcast/

X-https://x.com/Ryan_Staley1

Just wrapped another CRO roundtable last week in Chicago.
Stellar group. 

The conversation was unfiltered, insightful, and honestly pretty intense.


Here's what's actually keeping revenue leaders up at night:
1. Misaligned Expectations with the Board

Targets keep rising while market conditions keep deteriorating.
The fear isn't about working harder—it's about being held to numbers that completely ignore reality. How do you prove success when the metrics everyone's watching don't actually reflect what's happening in the business?




2. The AI Shock + Everything Changing at Once

Technology, GTM motions, buyer behavior, AI capabilities, org structure—all shifting simultaneously.

Without a clear framework, every change feels like risk instead of opportunity.

The real issue? Separating AI hype from actual impact before you waste time and credibility chasing vaporware.



3. Tech Stack Evolution vs. Human Adoption

The stack evolves faster than behavior, process, and culture ever will.
You've got increasingly sophisticated tools and data while revenue outcomes lag miles behind. The gap isn't closing—it's widening.



4. Margin and Pricing Pressure
Competitors are cutting price aggressively, creating massive pressure to follow.

Leaders are stuck protecting brand value and economics while discount pressure builds every single quarter. Race to the bottom or hold the line?



5. Comp Plans, Metrics, and Governance

Designing effective comp plans is brutal when GTM motions shift and turnover stays high.

Which metrics actually matter versus which ones just look good in board decks? How do you create incentive alignment when ownership across GTM is still fuzzy?


6. Cross-Functional GTM at Scale

Scaling Sales, CS, Product, and Marketing requires a unified operating model.

At hyper-scale, collaboration collapses into silos. Everyone wants a single customer journey—until it requires giving up their kingdom.



7. Talent and Ramp Reality
Ramping and retaining top reps in this environment is harder than ever.
The challenge? Distinguishing true high performers from strong interviewers. And balancing L&D investment against the reality of high turnover.



8. CRO Role Clarity and Org Design

When do you actually need a CRO versus a Head of Sales?

The difference is structural and political, not just a title change. Position the role wrong in the leadership architecture and it becomes friction instead of leverage.

Which of these 8 is hitting hardest for you right now?

Huge thank you to Warren Zenna to hosting

Also it was an amazing group and great to see Daniel Frailey Guy Rubin Greg Leos Howard Diamond Elio Narciso Marc Sabatini Jason A Wankovsky  James Kaikis

Founder & CEO, Whale Boss | Demystifying AI Agents | Helping revenue leaders 2x team results through AI Led GTM | Trusted by PE-backed SaaS | Transform your team in 60 days

I've learned more about life than I ever had this year, so I wrote down 20 things I know at 48 that I wish I knew at 28.

This is straight from the heart.



1. Working as an employee trains you to ask for permission. Working as a founder trains you to take action because your life depends on it.

2. Every 10 years, there was a technology evolution that I ignored because I was too busy. I missed the internet explosion (in early 2000), Mobile and Social (2008-2011), and Bitcoin (2015 at $230 vs. $100K+ now). I am not doing the same with AI.

3. I used to be massively afraid of failing; things had to be perfect. However, my most painful failures pushed me to do things that I never would have dreamed of.

4. Without some separation of work from relationships, health, and fun, life can seem empty when work doesn’t meet your expectations.

5. The biggest risk to an achiever with a hard work ethic is burnout. Recovery (in whatever form you need) is sometimes better than working an extra 5-10 hours weekly.

6. It’s better to have 2-3 amazingly loyal friends you can count on rather than 15 that are mediocre.

7. Lack of focus on your own can be just as paralyzing as a job you hate.

8. You can learn anything, but you don’t have time to learn everything.

9. Nobody has all the answers, and the fastest way to evolve is to do rather than passively watching LinkedIn, YouTube, taking courses, reading books, etc.

10. If you don’t make a plan for your life, you will live within the confines of someone else’s plan.

11. I appreciate my parents way more now because I have to parent and realize how hard they worked to give me an amazing life.

12. If you help others unselfishly, it always comes back to you, whether it be a day, a month, or years later.

13. God, the universe, or whatever you believe in will often guide you in simple ways if you just ask for it and allow for grace.

14. Daily focus on gratitude will transform who you are and your view of the world if you make space for it.

15. Alcohol doesn’t need to be a big part of your life to fit into social situations.

16. Your biggest breakthroughs will happen unexpectedly after you relentlessly work to improve through massive action.

17. Every person on this earth has a unique path that no one else has ever had. Take that experience and do the best you can with your unique gifts.

18. Focus is the biggest barrier you will face when AI makes custom knowledge free.

19. Your children will bring you joy that you can’t comprehend at 28.

20. If you take care of yourself physically, mentally and psychologically you won’t feel old.

That's all for now! I am sure more will come to me for a post 2 on this:)

Every company says they're "doing AI." Few are actually seeing results.

Why? They're treating AI like a 2-year R&D project when it should be a 60-day transformation.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE TYPICAL APPROACH (That Fails):

Months 1-6: Form committees, evaluate vendors
Months 7-12: Run pilots, "gather learnings"
Months 13-24: More pilots, maybe deploy something

Result: $500K spent, 2 years wasted, no impact

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE 60-DAY APPROACH (That Works):

Weeks 1-2: Pick ONE process, automate it, show immediate results
Weeks 3-4: Expand to 3 more processes, train team
Weeks 5-6: Connect to existing systems, measure everything
Weeks 7-8: Deploy revenue-generating applications

Result: $35K investment, 60 days, measurable ROI

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

WHY MOST FAIL:

- Analysis paralysis: Studying instead of using
 Boiling the ocean: Too many initiatives at once
 No quick wins: Team loses interest

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE ANTI-HYPE RULES:

1. Ship to production in Week 1 (not pilots)
2. One process at a time
3. Measure hours saved, not AI maturity
4. If it takes >60 days, you're doing it wrong

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

REAL EXAMPLE: $300M ARR Company

Day 1: Identified pain point (meeting prep), trained 30 reps
Day 14: 4.5 hrs/rep/week saved
Day 30: Expanded to email, research, CRM
Day 60: 300 hrs/week saved, pipeline up 20%, win rate up 6%

Investment: $35K | ROI: 400%+ in 90 days

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE BOTTOM LINE:

Stop planning AI. Start shipping AI.

60 days. Not 2 years.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Is your AI transformation taking too long?

whale-boss

li_at

JSESSIONID

Talks about #gtm, #sales, #chatgpt, #entrepreneurship, and #artificialintelligence

95% of executives are missing GPT-5's true potential.


WHEN I see people using GPT-5 like ChatGPT 4o...

WHAT I really see is millions in missed opportunities.

I just cracked GPT-5's three game-changing features that separate winners from wannabes:

Feature #1: 

The "Rival Intelligence" Framework ⚡ → Single prompt = 5 expert perspectives instantly → Customer + Shareholder + Employee + Competitor + Regulator analysis → I fed it Shopify's leaked AI memo - got strategic recommendations in 30 seconds


Feature #2: 

Your Data = Your Competitive Moat 🎯 → Connect HubSpot, Google Drive, Box directly to GPT-5 → Extract client dreams, fears, frustrations from 90 days of data → Generate personalized scripts + strategies from YOUR actual conversations


Feature #3: 

Agentic Workflow Mastery 🚀 → "Single-pass" prompting = no more back-and-forth → Deep market recon + strategy + execution in ONE prompt → Think strategic consulting team, not search engine


HOW to implement today:

Challenge Current Thinking: Use rival perspectives on your biggest decision

Mine Your Gold: Connect your CRM and ask for pattern analysis

Go Agentic: Create workflows that think 5 steps ahead

I'VE tested this with 2,500+ executives.

The results? Superhuman decision-making in seconds.

Most leaders are playing checkers with AI.

Smart ones are playing 4D chess.

Which game are you playing? 👇

Download The Ultimate GPT-5 Go-To-Market Prompting Toolkit: 
Profile link

Gpt 5 not Gpt 4

4 hours of GTM work → 15 minutes. Same outcome. ~2x quality.
Here’s what one AI workflow did for me last week:


The workflow (all in a single thread):

-Follow-up email with clear actions for the prospect.
-Deal coaching on how qualified it was through MEDDICC-style criteria.
-Next best actions based on my notes and pipeline context.
-Full proposal in my branding, with all the details tightened up.


🔥 Total time: ~15 minutes.

Old way: 3–4 hours of deep work.

Quality: better structure, cleaner narrative, stronger visuals than if I white-knuckled it myself.


This is why I think we need a new standard for AI ROI.

Not “I paid $100 for licenses, where’s my $40K?”


But:
Hours collapsed per workflow
Quality lift vs manual
Capacity unlocked per rep per week


The beautiful thing about it was that it wasn’t a complex Agent build.

It was a stacked workflow of 2 tools.


Those are the leading indicators that create the compounding ROI later.


Question for you: Where in your GTM motion would a “4 hours → 15 minutes” shift change the quarter?

$1.5 Trillion invested in AI in 2025.

90% of enterprises see ZERO impact on EBIT.

Let me say that again:

90% see no bottom-line impact.

Despite trillions invested.

Here's why (and what to do differently):

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**THE PARADOX:**

What's happening:
→ 92% plan to increase AI investment
→ 70%+ have integrated AI into at least one function
→ AI is everywhere in the enterprise

What's NOT happening:
→ Revenue growth from AI
→ Profit margin improvement
→ Bottom-line impact

The question everyone's avoiding:

Where's the ROI?

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE 3 FAILURE MODES:

1. Pilot Purgatory

Companies run 47 AI pilots.

None reach production.

Why? They're always "testing."

2. The Integration Gap

AI tools purchased.

Can't access company data.

Sit unused. Money wasted.

3. Time to Value Problem

Implementation takes 6+ months.

People lose interest.

Tools abandoned before impact.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

REAL DATA FROM MY CLIENTS:

Companies that SEE ROI:
→ Implementation in <60 days
→ Focus on 2-3 use cases max
→ Measure impact weekly
→ Result: 2x productivity, 10-20% revenue lift

Companies that DON'T see ROI:
→ Implementation in 6+ months
→ Try to boil the ocean (10+ use cases)
→ Measure impact quarterly (or never)
→ Result: Wasted investment, team burnout

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE "TIME TO VALUE" FRAMEWORK:

If people don't see results in 2 weeks, they quit.

Here's how to beat that:

Week 1:
→ Pick ONE painful process
→ Implement ONE AI solution
→ Show immediate time savings

**Week 2:**
→ Quantify the impact
→ Share wins widely
→ Build momentum

**Week 3-4:**
→ Scale what worked
→ Add ONE more use case
→ Repeat

**Result:**
→ Fast wins compound
→ Adoption spreads organically
→ Bottom-line impact in 90 days (not never)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**THE BOTTOM LINE:**

The $1.5 Trillion AI investment paradox isn't about bad technology.

It's about bad implementation.

**Fix these 3 things:**

1. Get out of pilot purgatory (ship to production)
2. Solve integration FIRST (data access is everything)
3. Deliver value in weeks, not quarters

Do that?

You'll be in the 10% that actually sees ROI.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Are you seeing AI ROI at your company?

Or are you stuck in pilot purgatory?

Comment below. 👇

It took me 10 years to learn how to qualify deals effectively.

AI can do it in 3 questions.

With 95% accuracy.

Here's how:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE OLD WAY:

Years 1-3: Learn your product inside out
Years 4-6: Understand your market deeply
Years 7-10: Master pattern recognition

Result: Expert intuition about which deals will close

Time investment: 10 years

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE NEW WAY:

3 Questions to AI:

Question 1:
"Based on our last 100 won deals, what are the top 5 characteristics that predict a win?"

Question 2:
"Analyze this new opportunity: [paste deal details]. How does it compare to our ideal customer profile based on actual wins?"

Question 3:
"What are the 3 biggest red flags from our lost deals that appear in this opportunity?"

Result: Data-driven qualification in 5 minutes

Accuracy: 95%+ (tested against actual outcomes)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

WHY THIS WORKS:

Human intuition:
→ Based on maybe 50-100 deals you remember
→ Influenced by recency bias
→ Misses subtle patterns

AI analysis:
→ Based on ALL your historical deals
→ No bias, just patterns
→ Sees correlations humans miss

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

REAL EXAMPLE:

Sales rep brought me a "perfect" opportunity:

Human intuition said:
→ Great fit company
→ Budget approved
→ Timeline makes sense
→ "This is closing for sure"

AI analysis revealed:
→ Company size matches lost deals (not won deals)
→ Title of decision maker is different than usual champions
→ Deal velocity is 2x slower than typical wins
→ Missing 3 key buying triggers from successful deals

Recommendation: Deprioritize

Outcome: Deal stalled at 120 days, never closed

AI was right. Human intuition was wrong.

Every company says they're "doing AI." Few are actually seeing results.

Why? They're treating AI like a 2-year R&D project when it should be a 60-day transformation.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE TYPICAL APPROACH (That Fails):

Months 1-6: Form committees, evaluate vendors
Months 7-12: Run pilots, "gather learnings"
Months 13-24: More pilots, maybe deploy something

Result: $500K spent, 2 years wasted, no impact

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE 60-DAY APPROACH (That Works):

Weeks 1-2: Pick ONE process, automate it, show immediate results
Weeks 3-4: Expand to 3 more processes, train team
Weeks 5-6: Connect to existing systems, measure everything
Weeks 7-8: Deploy revenue-generating applications

Result: $35K investment, 60 days, measurable ROI
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

WHY MOST FAIL:

- Analysis paralysis: Studying instead of using
 Boiling the ocean: Too many initiatives at once
 No quick wins: Team loses interest
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE ANTI-HYPE RULES:
1. Ship to production in Week 1 (not pilots)
2. One process at a time
3. Measure hours saved, not AI maturity
4. If it takes >60 days, you're doing it wrong
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

It-took-me-10-years-to-learn-how-to-qualify-deals-effectively.pdf

Google Just Opened a 90-Day Competitive Window
Most businesses will miss it entirely.


I've watched this pattern for 3 years across 2,500+ executives:


Early movers capture 12-18 months of market advantage. Hesitators spend years catching up.


It's happening again. Right now.


The Tests That Matter
I spent 48 hours stress-testing Gemini 3 on real business scenarios:
Sales Prep: 

3 hours → 10 minutes (same quality, better output) 

Website Build: 3 weeks → 63 seconds (921 lines of functional code) 
Analytics Dashboard: 2 weeks → minutes (production-ready)

Zero exaggeration. I recorded everything.


The Business Math

Your team of 50 can now perform like 60-75. 
Your content velocity increases 5-10×. 
Your decision speed accelerates 10-20×.


Same headcount. Same budget. Different results.


Your 3-Stage Play
Days 1-30: Individual team members test on daily tasks (10-20% time savings) 
Days 31-60: Scale across departments (30-40% capacity increase) 
Days 61-90: AI-first workflows deployed (50%+ multiplication)

NOTE: After 90 days, this becomes table stakes. The advantage window closes.

The Split Happening Now
Group A: Testing this week, implementing next week, scaling by month-end Group B: "Monitoring the situation"
Group A dominates their markets by Q2 2025. Group B explains market share losses to their boards.


Your 7-Day Action Plan


Day 1-2: Identify your highest-value, most time-intensive process 
Day 3-4: Assign your best operator to test Gemini 3 
Day 5: Document time/capacity savings Day 6-7: Scale or course-correct

The Question


You won't get disrupted by AI.

You'll get disrupted by competitors using AI better than you.

Are you testing this week, or "waiting for more information"?

The 90-day clock is ticking ⏰

The GPT-5.1 rumors have my full attention.

What I’m hearing from people who actually know:

→ Not an update. A transformation.
→ Reasoning that makes current models look broken.
→ Speed + pricing that changes everything.


Here’s what happens if this is real:
The gap between AI-first and AI-last companies becomes uncrossable.
Workflows we teach today become obsolete next week.


6-month “AI strategies” get rewritten in 48 hours.


What I’m telling clients:

Don’t wait to “see what happens.”
Build the muscle of rapid AI adoption NOW.


Because if these rumors are accurate, you’ll need it in 3 weeks.


Bottom line:
The curve is about to bend.
Teams ready to move fast will capture 18 months of advantage in 60 days.


Teams still “evaluating” will be explaining to their board why they’re behind.



Which side will you be on?

BREAKING-CLAUDE 4.5 OPUS RELEASE (here's what it actually means)
I've spent 3 years implementing AI for go-to-market teams.   
Here's what I've learned about benchmarks:


Nobody cares about the scores.
They care about what the scores MEAN for their Monday morning.


So let me translate the latest Claude Opus 4.5 results into plain English:


WHAT THE NUMBERS SAY:

Agentic Coding: 80.9% (fixes 4 out of 5 real software bugs)
Tool Use: 98.1% (completes multi-tool tasks reliably)
Scaled Tool Use: 62.3% (orchestrates many tools simultaneously)
Novel Problem Solving: 37.6% (still struggles with truly creative thinking)


WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR TEAM:

🔹 For CROs: Your SDRs spend hours on research before every call. AI can now do that research in 10 minutes with 80%+ accuracy. That's 2-3 extra meetings per AE per week.
🔹 For CMOs: Campaign execution bottlenecks disappear when AI handles reporting, repurposing, and distribution simultaneously. 2X output. Same team.
🔹 For RevOps: Manual CRM updates, forecast modeling, pipeline analysis—AI handles 50%+ of this autonomously now. Your analysts focus on insights, not data entry.


WHAT THIS DOESN'T MEAN:

AI isn't replacing your closers.

The novel problem solving score (37.6%) tells you where humans win: complex negotiations, relationship building, creative strategy.

That number was near 0% two years ago—so the frontier is moving.
But TODAY, the play is clear:


AI handles the mechanics. Humans handle the moments.

The companies I work with aren't debating this anymore.
They're racing to reorganize around it.


How are you thinking about deploying agentic AI this quarter? Drop your use case below—I'll share what's working.

The "Pilot Purgatory" Problem
The traditional software playbook is KILLING your AI ROI.

Here's what I mean:
I've seen dozens of Public, VC, PE-backed companies spend 6-9 months "validating" AI pilots.

By the time they're ready to scale? The technology has already evolved 3 generations.

OpenAI just released data showing they've shipped a new feature every ~3 days this year.


Your quarterly validation cycle can't keep pace with weekly capability improvements.


Here's the uncomfortable truth most consultants won't tell you:
The companies stuck in pilots aren't failing because of technology.


They're failing because they're applying OLD playbooks to NEW capabilities.
🔹 Traditional software: Start small → Test a specific use case → Scale once proven 

🔹 AI implementation: Build learning systems → Iterate in weeks → Scale while improving


The difference?
AI systems don't follow fixed rules. 
They generate outputs based on patterns, data, and context.


Success changes with new inputs.

That means quality and reliability require CONTINUOUS evaluation, feedback, and iteration.


NOT a 6-month pilot program that measures last quarter's metrics.


Here's what I've seen work in 60-day transformations:

Shorter loops (weekly, not quarterly reviews)

Decentralized learning (champions across every team)

Immediate measurement against business outcomes


NOTE: The companies reaching production consistently share one trait—they balance speed with structure and evolve as fast as the technology.



Is your AI strategy moving at the speed of ChatGPT's feature releases, or the speed of your annual planning cycle?

Gemini 3.0 in 3 Minutes: Live website & Dashboard build (INSANE RESULTS)

This one blew me away.  

After playing with this all weekend Google really knocked the cover off the ball.

Turning cold leads into warm leads.

This was a combo of Gemini 🍌and @grok 

The ability to generate an insane scene and then animate it can be done for $60 per month of what would have taken $10,000 in the past in addition.



It can be done from your phone in literally 5 minutes vs a multi-week process.



Insane that this is possible.  And opens up creativity to so many people.

40% of enterprises say they lack internal AI expertise.

This number is about to get worse.

Here's why (and what to do):

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE SKILLS GAP DATA:

What enterprises need:
→ AI strategy development
→ Prompt engineering expertise
→ AI workflow design
→ Integration architecture
→ Change management for AI

What they have:
→ Traditional IT skills
→ Legacy system knowledge
→ Pre-AI processes
→ No AI-native talent

The gap is widening.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

WHY THE GAP IS GROWING:

Reason 1: AI Skills Are Brand New
→ These roles didn't exist 2 years ago
→ No traditional education path
→ Learn by doing, not by degree

Reason 2: Competition for AI Talent Is Brutal
→ Startups offering $300K+ for AI roles
→ Enterprises can't compete on salary
→ Best talent going to AI-first companies

Reason 3: Skills Evolve Monthly
→ What was cutting-edge 6 months ago is basic now
→ Constant learning required
→ Traditional training programs too slow

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE 3 TYPES OF AI SKILLS NEEDED:

Type 1: Foundational (Everyone needs)
→ AI tool usage (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)
→ Basic prompting
→ Understanding AI capabilities/limitations

Current gap: 60% of employees lack this

Type 2: Applied (Power users need)
→ Advanced prompting techniques
→ Custom GPT creation
→ Workflow automation
→ AI + existing tools integration

Current gap: 80% of employees lack this

Type 3: Strategic (Leadership needs)
→ AI strategy development
→ ROI calculation
→ Risk assessment
→ Change management

Current gap: 90% of leaders lack this

Does your company have the AI skills it needs?

Or are you in the 40%?

The-Skills-Crisis-A-dollar500K-Problem-With-a-dollar35K-Solution.pdf

A CRO of a Publicly Company told me he'd trade his worst performing salesperson to fund AI transformation.

Not fire a large part of his team because of AI.

Trade the lowest performing person FOR AI.

That conversation revealed something I've now confirmed across hundreds of executive conversations:

The leaders who will win in 2026 aren't thinking about AI as a technology decision.


They're thinking about it as a RESOURCE ALLOCATION decision.

After 3 years and 2,500+ executive AI implementations, here are the 7 beliefs driving their 2026 AI strategies:

1. AI is strategically non-optional—but must be grounded in execution 
🔹 Not a side experiment. Not a pilot. 
🔹 They want AI hardwired into campaigns, daily activities, and systems.


2. Willing to fund AI by reallocating headcount, not adding spend 
🔹 One mid-performing rep = one AI transformation budget. 
🔹 They're in reallocation mode, not expansion mode.


3. Training must be the most relevant enablement they've ever had 
🔹 No theory. No hype. 
🔹 People must leave sessions doing specific things differently TOMORROW.


4. Transformation must be phased and resilient to changing priorities 
🔹 They're notorious for changing direction. 
🔹 Crawl-walk-run beats big-bang every time.


5. Time and change-capacity are the scarcest resources 
🔹 AI work must be time-neutral or time-accretive. 
🔹 It can't feel like "another initiative."


6. AI must compensate for structural underinvestment 
🔹 No dedicated data analysts. Underfunded marketing. 
🔹 AI is the force multiplier that covers the gaps.


7. The AI story must be consistent across sales + marketing + leadership 
🔹 One storyline. One SOW. 
🔹 CFO and CMO must see their words in the program.


NOTE: The bar has changed. Executives will trade headcount for AI—IF it clearly drives daily behavior change and revenue outcomes.


Which of these 7 beliefs resonates most with what you're hearing from leadership?


Struggling to figure this out? 

DM me to see how your peers are tackling this for 26 and beyond.

Save Hours Every Week With This Simple Trick!

I used to spend 10+ hours every week writing marketing content. It was a time sink.


Then I leveraged AI, and my content workflow exploded:

Generated 30 LinkedIn posts in 15 minutes.

Created 12 YouTube video outlines (including SEO/AEO research, thumbnail designs, and full scripts) in the same time.


The best part? Same quality, 95% less time.


This isn't just about speed; it's about shifting your focus from creation to strategy.

The secret is knowing exactly what’s possible with Claude Code (outside of traditional coding). It’s a game-changer for Marketing, Sales, and general Go-to-Market functions.

#AI #ContentMarketing #LinkedInStrategy #Productivity #GoToMarket

Sometimes I think we overcomplicate AI in sales.

Everyone wants the perfect playbook, the secret sauce, the one tool that will magically double revenue.

But the truth is, most of the wins I’ve seen come from small, gritty experiments.

A team tries a new AI-powered lead scoring model. It flops. They tweak it, try again. Suddenly, they’re booking 30% more meetings.

Or a manager uses AI to analyze call recordings. Finds out the top reps ask twice as many questions as everyone else. Next week, the whole team is trying it. Win rates jump.

It’s not glamorous. It’s not always scalable. But it works.

AI isn’t a silver bullet. It’s a thousand little adjustments, stacked up over time.

The teams that win aren’t the ones with the biggest budgets. They’re the ones willing to get their hands dirty, fail fast, and learn faster.

So if your AI project feels messy, you’re probably on the right track.

What’s the smallest experiment that made the biggest impact for your team?

Mixing models? 

 There’s been a lot of different opinions in terms of mixing models however, I’m absolutely blown away that I could create a video like this in five minutes by using nano banana pro 🍌with Grok 4.1 imagine.

I get for standardization purposes of ONLY ONE LLM in large organizations has huge value however, a lot of the large language models are like superheroes that each have their own special superpower.

The #1 Done-For-You LinkedIn Growth System for Execs & Visionaries | We Don’t Just Advise, We Execute | Clients Gained 1M+ Followers in 2024 & 6-7 Figure Deals with Nike, NASA, US Army & More | Book Your Strategy Call 👇

After 10+ years building 15+ award-winning brands, and fueling 8-figure exits, I realized I was playing too small..

I craved a bigger impact.

So I launched Brain Apes to serve visionary founders and execs who want real traction and more influence, without endless trial and error.

What we do:

→ We blend real-world business development and social media expertise, no “copy/paste” course nonsense here.

→ We live in the trenches, delivering presence, strategy, and results that speak for themselves:

🥇 Scaled an org to 200+ employees
🥇 Got a franchise acquired for 8 figures
🥇 Built 37 award-winning brands in 2024
🥇 Added 1M+ followers to clients in 2024 alone
🥇 Fundraised $300K+ in wellness tech pre-seed
🥇 Built a portfolio of award-winning cannabis brands
🥇 Elevated 20+ coaches to 4-5-figure offers that sell
🥇 Managed and monetized 6, 7 and 8-figure audiences
🥇 Helped a local biz win 85+ awards (most in the state)
🥇 Scaled multiple retail & service-based businesses to 7/8+ figures and win awards 

What clients say:

“Working with you in 2024 was so helpful for account growth for my co-founder and me. In total, we added over 40,000 followers and generated millions of impressions. It also helped us raise funds for Prescribe Life—we’re over halfway through our $500K pre-seed raise. You and your team were awesome!”
– Oli J., Co-Founder of Prescribe Health

“Thanks to the offer stack you helped me build, I’ve been closing $20K offers. Also, I can’t believe how quickly you grew my LinkedIn: 0 to 8K in just a few months! You seriously delivered.”
– XK, Founder & Master Coach

“One of THE BEST decisions for my business and life! It’s only been seven days and my LinkedIn is exploding: at least 10X reach, more high-quality interactions, and tons more calls booked for my publishing services!”
– Ben Gioa, Founder of Leadership Awake LLC

Our formula:

1. Nail your positioning and offer
2. Boost content performance
3. Go on offense and get attention

You could spend 120+ hours a week to figure it all out…

Or let us handle everything for you.

(Our Strategy + Your Expertise) x Our Team = Audience Growth & Revenue.

→ We don’t work with everyone.
→ We always have a waitlist.
→ We’re not cheap, but we deliver on our promises (and then some).

Ready for massive results and unstoppable growth?

Book a free executive strategy call with me. 
I’ll give you clarity, no punches pulled.. 

And if we’re a good fit, we’ll craft an offer to work together.

Ready to see what’s possible for your brand in the next 90 days?

Claim your spot here:
brainapes.com/strategy

Jordan Murphy 🧠🦍

He Doesn't Know Every Detail. He Knows the Next Step.

A kid builds a trick shot.

But he's not planning the whole thing upfront.

He sets up one piece. Tests it. Watches what happens.

Then uses that information to set up the next piece guiding toward the end goal.

Each attempt tells him what to do next.

He's not guessing. He's building step by step.

This is how you actually build something.

Not with a perfect plan.

Not with a five-year roadmap that accounts for every variable.

Not by figuring out the entire thing before you start.

You build by knowing the next step.

Most founders waste months (at best) trying to see the whole path.

They want to know exactly how the product will scale before they build v1.

They want to map out year three before they've closed their first customer.

They want certainty about the end before they're willing to start.

And while they're planning, someone else is testing.

Someone else is setting up the first piece, watching what happens, and adjusting.

Someone else is building step by step.

And by the time the planners are ready to start, the builders are already three steps ahead.

Here's what that kid understands that most people don't:

You can't know the end until you start.

The trick shot reveals itself as you build it.

Each attempt gives you information you didn't have before.

The path forward only becomes clear when you take the step.

This is iterative strategy.

You don't need to see the whole staircase. You just need to see the next step.

You don't need perfect information. You need enough information to move forward.

You don't need certainty about the outcome. You need clarity about the next move.

And then you move.

You test. You learn. You adjust. You build the next piece based on what the last piece taught you.

The best companies I know were built this way.

They didn't start with the master plan.

They started with a hypothesis and a first step.

They shipped. They watched. They learned.

And then they built the next step based on what they learned.

The strategy emerged through building, not before it.

Because what you learn is:

The market will teach you things no amount of planning can predict.

Your customers will show you paths you never saw coming.

Your product will evolve in ways you didn't expect.

You can't plan for that. You can only respond to it.

And the only way to respond is to be in motion.

To be testing. To be building. To be learning from each step.

So here's the question:

What are you waiting to have figured out before you start?

What's the next step you already know, but you're not taking because you can't see the whole path?

Because you don't need to know the end.

You just need to know the next step.

And then take it.

What's one thing you're overplanning that you could just start testing?

📹 littlebroslegit
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Built the Momentum Before Anyone Got On

A man built a wooden swing in his backyard.

Seats 4 people. Wraps around a pool. Suspended by rope.

But here's the part most people miss:

Before anyone gets on, he spins it. Over and over. Coiling the rope upward.

Building tension. Storing energy. Creating momentum.

Then everyone loads on. Gets in their seats.

And when they release it, the swing descends as it uncoils.

Spinning faster and faster.

The fun part only works because of what he did first.

This is how you actually build something.

Everyone sees the spin. The speed. The results.

They see the team celebrating. The customers flooding in. The revenue growing.

They see the momentum.

But they don't see the coiling.

They don't see the months you spent building the product before anyone cared.

They don't see the systems you put in place before you had a team to run them.

They don't see the audience you built before you had something to sell.

They don't see you spinning the rope, alone, building the momentum before anyone got on.

Most founders want the results without the setup.

They want the swing to spin without doing the coiling.

They want momentum without building it first.

They want the team, the customers, the growth, but they skip the part where you're alone in the backyard winding the rope.

And then they wonder why nothing takes off.

Here's what that guy understands:

The descent is automatic. The coiling takes effort.

Once the system is built, once the momentum is there, the results feel effortless.

People get on. The swing spins. Everyone has a great time.

But that only happens because someone did the work first.

The best businesses I know were built this way.

The founder spent months, sometimes years, coiling.

Building the product. Testing the market. Refining the message. Creating the systems.

Alone. Unglamorous. Invisible.

And then, when the momentum was ready, they let people on.

And it looked effortless.

It looked like an overnight success.

It looked like they just got lucky.

But the momentum was built long before anyone was watching.

So here's the question:

Are you trying to spin without coiling?

Are you expecting momentum without building it first?

Are you waiting for people to get on before you've done the work to create the ride?

Because the swing only spins if you wind it up first.

The business only scales, the audience only grows if you build the foundation.

The team only thrives if you create the systems.

You have to build the momentum before anyone gets on.

What's one thing you're building right now that no one sees yet?

📹 justinflom
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Let Go Mid-Air and Trusted the Timing

A guy sends it off a massive ramp.

Goes up. Flips his bike mid-air. Lets it go.

The bike flips faster than he's flipping.

He's front-flipping through the air. The bike's doing its own thing.

Then he catches the handlebars. Perfectly.

Pulls the bike back into control. Whips it into another front flip.

Lands it.

The bike flipped twice. He flipped once. Perfect timing.

He let go mid-air and trusted the timing.

This is the hardest thing for leaders to learn.

Letting go.

Not at the comfortable moment. Not when everything's stable.

Mid-air. When you're already committed. When it feels like the worst possible time.

But sometimes that's exactly when you have to let go.

Most leaders hold on too tight.

They try to control everything. Micromanage every detail. Keep their hands on the handlebars at all times.

And they wonder why they can't pull off the bigger moves.

Because some tricks require release.

Some outcomes only happen when you let go and trust the timing.

Here's what that guy on the bike understands:

You can't flip the bike twice while holding on the whole time.

To land the trick, you have to let go.

Not recklessly. Not without preparation.

But at the exact right moment, you release control.

And you trust that the timing will bring it back together.

The best leaders I know have learned this.

They let go of decisions their team can make.

They let go of control over processes that don't need their hands on them.

They let go of micromanaging outcomes and trust the people they hired.

Not because they don't care. Because they know the trick requires it.

You can't scale while holding onto everything.
You can't grow while controlling every detail.
You can't pull off the bigger moves while gripping the handlebars.

But here's the part most people miss:

Letting go isn't the same as giving up.

That guy didn't just throw the bike away and hope for the best.

He let go with timing.

He knew when to release. He knew when to catch. He knew the rhythm.

And that's what made it work.

Strategic release requires:

Knowing what to let go of.
Knowing when to let go.

Trusting the timing of when it comes back together.

And then catching it at exactly the right moment.

Most founders fail at one of these:

They let go of the wrong things.
They let go at the wrong time.

They don't trust the timing and try to grab back too early.

Or they let go and never catch it again.

But the ones who master it? They scale.

They pull off moves no one else can.
They land tricks that look impossible.

Because they learned to let go mid-air and trust the timing.

So here's the question:

What are you holding onto that you need to let go of?

What would become possible if you released control and trusted the timing?

What's one thing you let go of that felt terrifying but ended up working?

📹 rwilly
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Wasn't Playing Pool. He Was Playing Him.

Two guys playing pool.

One guy takes his shot. Sinks a ball.

While the other guy watches the ball go in, he grabs another ball with his mouth. Pops it in the pocket.

Fake chalks his cue with another ball. Slides another into a pocket.

Walks around. Lines up the eight ball. Game winner.

Sinks it.

Game over.

The other guy never saw it coming.

He wasn't playing pool. He was playing him.

This is what happens when you don't realize what game you're actually in.

You think you're competing on skill.

They're competing on something else entirely.

And by the time you figure it out, the game's already over.

I see this in business all the time.

You're focused on building the best product.

Your competitor's focused on controlling distribution.

You're optimizing features.

They're locking up partnerships.

You're playing product. They're playing access.

And they win before you realize you were in different games.

Or:

You're competing on price.
They're competing on brand.

You're racing to the bottom trying to be cheaper.
They're building a moat where price doesn't matter.

You're playing pool. They're playing you.

Here's the thing about meta-games:

They're invisible until it's too late.

You don't see the moves because you're watching the wrong thing.

You're focused on the ball going in the pocket.

You're not watching what's happening while you're distracted.

And that's exactly when they make their move.

The best competitors understand this.

They know the stated game isn't always the real game.

They know that while you're focused on one dimension, they can win on another.

They know that misdirection is a strategy.

And they use it.

So here's the question:

What game do you think you're playing?

And are you sure your competitors are playing the same one?

Because if you're optimizing for the wrong game, you've already lost.

If you're focused on product while they're focused on distribution, you lose.

If you're focused on features while they're focused on network effects, you lose.

If you're focused on price while they're focused on brand, you lose.

Not because you're bad at your game. Because you're playing the wrong one.

The smartest move?

Step back and ask: what game is actually being played here?

Not the obvious one. Not the one everyone says they're playing.

The real one.

The one where balls are being pocketed while you're watching somewhere else.

The one where the game's over before you realize it started.

And if you're the one being played:

Pay attention to what's happening when you're distracted.

Question what looks smooth and confident.

Ask yourself: are they playing pool, or playing me?

Because the game you think you're in might not be the game you're actually losing.

What's one time you realized too late that someone was playing a different game than you?

📹 thepointerbrothers
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Never Had the Lead. He Never Lost His Composure.

Two guys. Head to head. Pop all the balloons first.

Multiple obstacles. Different tools. Pure competition.

The guy on the right has the lead the entire time.

Faster. Ahead. Winning.

The guy on the left? Behind. The whole way.

But he never panics. Stays focused. Never loses his composure.

And at the very end, he wins.

This is what separates the leaders who last from the ones who burn out.

Not speed. Not being ahead. Not having the early lead.

Composure.

The ability to stay calm when you're behind.

The ability to execute when the pressure's on.

The ability to keep moving forward when everyone else is ahead of you.

Most founders panic when they're not winning.

They see a competitor raise more. They panic and overspend.

They see someone else launch first. They panic and rush their product.

They see slower growth than expected. They panic and pivot too early.

The panic costs them more than being behind ever did.

Here's what that guy on the left understood:
Being behind doesn't mean you're losing.

It just means you're behind. Right now.

And right now doesn't determine the outcome.

Your composure does.

Your ability to stay focused on your process while everyone else is focused on the scoreboard.

Your ability to execute your strategy even when it looks like it's not working yet.

The best leaders I know have been behind more times than they've been ahead.

They've watched competitors get more attention.

They've seen others hit milestones first.

They've had quarters where the numbers didn't look good.

But they never lost their composure.

They didn't panic. They didn't abandon their strategy. They didn't let being behind change how they showed up.

They stayed calm. They stayed focused. They kept executing.

And more often than not, they won.

Not because they were faster.

Because they were steadier.

Composure is a competitive advantage.

When everyone else is reacting, you're responding.

When everyone else is panicking, you're executing.

When everyone else is watching the scoreboard, you're focused on the next balloon.

That's how you win.

Not by being ahead the whole time.

By staying composed when you're not.

So here's the question:

Where are you behind right now?

And are you panicking, or are you staying composed?

Are you abandoning your strategy because someone else is ahead, or are you trusting your process?

Because the lead doesn't matter if you lose your composure.

And composure always has a chance to win.

When's a time you were behind but stayed composed and it paid off?

📹 howridiculous
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

I'm pissed no one showed me this sooner.

Last month, a client was burning 11+ hours a week on demo calls.

Same pitch. Same slides. Different prospects.

By call 12? His energy was dead. His close rate was dropping. And he was ready to hire two more sales reps just to keep up.

I told him: "We're not scaling your exhaustion. We're replacing the repetition."

Here's what we did:

Built an automation that turns presentations into AI-narrated videos.

Gamma creates the slides → Synthesia adds an AI avatar → ElevenLabs clones his voice.

Zero filming. Zero editing. Just polished video content that sounds and looks like him.

The result?

→ 11+ hours back in his week
→ Prospects watching on their own time
→ Higher engagement (they pause, rewatch, come to calls already sold)
→ Close rate went up because he's only talking to qualified leads

He's not exhausted. He's not repeating himself. And he's closing more deals.

Here's the thing..

Most software is a minivan.

Built for teams of 47 people. Loaded with features you'll never touch. Requires three tutorials just to do one thing.

Meanwhile, you're a solo founder who needs a deck out by 9 AM.

You don't need all this. You just need to move fast.

Gamma is the single-seater.

No extra seats. No wasted space. No compromise.

Just you, the machine, and the road.

Most people think it's just an AI presentation tool.

And yeah, it makes beautiful decks.

But it's actually a machine that takes your messy thoughts and turns them into polished output in whatever format you need.

Presentation. Document. Website. Carousel. Whatever.

You stop worrying about fonts and spacing. You focus on your message. It handles the rest.

Legit impressed with the product, so I read into their founder - Grant Lee - and it made perfect sense. And now I'm more impressed.

He spent years drowning in slide decks as a consultant. PowerPoint sucked and nobody was building the alternative.

In 2020, he and 2 co-founders started building from a two-bedroom apartment.

4 years later:

→ 50 million users
→ $50M ARR
→ Profitable since early 2024
→ Built with just 30 people

30 people. Props bro 👊

That's the single-seater energy.

When you're running that lean, you can't afford bloat.

You build exactly what people need because you're close enough to feel it.

↓

Btw want the exact resources we used to build this workflow?

Comment "VIDEO" and I'll send the drive link.

📹 adamsevani
🔔 Follow me for daily insights 🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

The Wheel Moves. He Stays Centered.

A guy built a custom one-wheel vehicle.

Monster truck-sized tire. Cockpit in the middle.

The wheel rolls and spins in every direction.

But the cockpit? On a rotational axis.

As long as he stays engaged, he stays oriented. Stable. Facing forward.

The moment he disengages the clutch, he spins with it.

This is what leadership looks like.

The market moves. Your competitors move. Your team moves.

Everything around you is constantly spinning.

Your job isn't to control the wheel.

Your job is to stay centered while it moves.

And that requires staying engaged.

Most leaders try to stop the wheel from spinning.

→ They react to every market shift.
→ They panic at every competitor move.
→ They let every setback throw them off balance.

And they wonder why they're always dizzy.

And that emotion is a waste of energy..

The wheel is going to move. That's what wheels do.

Fighting it doesn't help. Resisting it doesn't stop it.

The only thing you can control is your center.

But you have to stay engaged to stay centered.

The moment you disengage, you spin with everything else.

How you stay engaged and centered:

Presence.

Being here. Right now.

Not in the story about what's spinning around you.

Not in the drama of what might happen or what just happened.

Just here. Centered. Present. Engaged.

I practice this with something simple: smiling.

Not because everything's perfect.

Because I choose to rest in the smile.

As often as I can remember, I smile.

A real one. A grounded one.

The kind that says: whatever is, is.

Without the undesired, distracting emotional drama.

That smile is my engagement. My anchor. My center.

The wheel is always moving.

There will always be something to react to.

But you don't have to go with it.

You can let the wheel spin and stay exactly where you are.

Centered. Present. Smiling. Engaged.

Not because you're ignoring reality.

Because you're not adding unnecessary drama to it.

The best leaders stay centered.

The market crashes. They stay centered.

The competitor launches. They stay centered.

The deal falls through. They stay centered.

Not because nothing bothers them.

Because they've practiced staying present enough that they don't get pulled into the spin.

They stay engaged. They don't disengage and spin with the chaos.

This is a practice.

You notice when you're getting pulled into the spin.

You come back to your breath. You come back to the present moment.

You smile. You rest in that smile. You stay engaged with your center.

The wheel moves. You stay centered. But only if you stay engaged.

What's one practice that helps you stay centered when everything's spinning?

📹 millybampainti
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

TRUST YOUR TEAM

I've burned teams to the ground, accidentally setting them up for failure.

Hiring the right people is key, but once they’re in?

It’s even more crucial to empower and trust them.

But micromanagement?

That’s a recipe for stagnation.

Trust and autonomy, on the other hand, fuel creativity and performance.

When your team feels valued and in control of their roles, they grow.. and so does the business.

That builds a culture that thrives on engagement, innovation, and retention.

Here’s how to build an empowered, self-driven culture:

1. Hire with Intention
Seek not just skills but alignment with your values and mission.

2. Trust Your People
Give them ownership over their work, and avoid over-managing.

3. Encourage Autonomy
Empower decision-making and provide the tools they need to succeed.

4. Invest in Leadership
Develop leaders who know how to nurture and elevate their teams.

5. Foster Open Communication
Create a space where ideas and feedback flow freely.

6. Celebrate Wins
Recognize achievements, big or small, to motivate and retain top talent.

7. Promote Balance
Help your team balance work with life, it pays back in loyalty and performance.

8. Equip Teams with Resources for Growth
Provide access to training, mentorship, and development programs to support continuous learning.

9. Encourage Creative Problem-Solving
Let employees tackle challenges their way, giving them room to bring fresh ideas and solutions to the table.

10. Check In Regularly
Make time for honest, two-way feedback, showing your team you’re invested in their growth and open to improving your own leadership.

Building trust isn’t about blind, hands-off management.

It’s about being intentional in how you empower and support each team member.

Please slow down and be there with your team.

Don't have a media team yet?
Wanna work with me and mine?

Let's build the brand your reputation deserves.

📅 Grab a free strategy call with me
Click: Book an appointment (atop this post)

シ

♻️ Be kind. Smash that repost button.
🔔 Follow Jordan Murphy 🧠🦍 for more.
💬 Which (1-10) is the most important to you?

Share it below!

Some Decisions You Make Alone

A solo base jump off the roof of a huge condo building.

Beautiful view. Massive height. No team. No backup.

Just one person, the edge, and the decision.

No one else can make this jump for you.

That's what leadership feels like sometimes.

Not the polished version where you're "empowering your team" and "building consensus."

The other version.

Where you're standing on the edge of a decision that only you can make.

Where everyone has an opinion, but no one else has to live with the outcome.

Where all the advice in the world doesn't change the fact that you're the one who has to jump.

The loneliest moments in leadership aren't the failures.

They're the decisions.

Letting someone go who's been with you from the start.

Pivoting away from the product you spent two years building.

Turning down funding because the terms don't feel right.

Betting the company on a direction no one else believes in yet.

You can get input. You can run the numbers. You can talk it through.

But at some point, you're standing on that roof alone.

And no one else can jump for you.

Here's what most people don't tell you about being a founder:

The hardest part isn't the work.

It's the weight of knowing that every major decision comes down to you.

Your co-founder can advise. Your team can execute. Your investors can push.

But the jump? That's yours.

And if you're wrong, you don't just fall. Your team falls with you.

The leaders who last aren't the ones who avoid these moments.

They're the ones who've learned to stand on the edge without freezing.

They've learned to make the call even when they don't have perfect information.

They've learned to trust their judgment when everyone else is hedging.

They've learned that some decisions you just have to make alone.

Not because you want to.

Not because you're trying to be a hero.

Because that's what leadership is.

And the thing about those solo jumps..

Sometimes you're right. Sometimes you're wrong.

But you'll never know until you jump.

And the leaders who build something real? 
They jump anyway.

They don't wait for certainty. They don't wait for permission. They don't wait for someone else to go first.

They stand on the edge, they make the call, and they commit.

So here's the question:

What decision are you standing on the edge of right now?

What call do you know you need to make, but you're waiting for someone else to validate it?

Because no one else can make this jump for you.

You can plan forever. You can gather more data. You can ask for more opinions.

Or you can trust yourself and jump.

What's one decision you made alone that changed everything?

📹 mateomassoni
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

You're not losing, you're learning.

(If you're an ROI thinker.)

Here are 10 key shifts to adopt this mindset:

↓

1. Embrace failure as a powerful tool.
Failure isn't a setback; it's a step forward.

• Iterate and refine your approach
• Extract all value from every situation
• Develop clarity through systematic question flows

↳ Failure is the ultimate teacher.

2. Bet on yourself.
As an ROI thinker, I bet on my abilities.

• My first high-ticket coaching sale was $9k
• Reinvested in my business with a key hire
• Freed up my time to focus on strengths

↳ This bet transformed my business.

3. Reinvest strategically.
ROI thinkers know where to put their money.

• Invest in resources that unlock more time
• Look for investments with compounding returns
• Focus on building exceptional products and services

↳ Strategic reinvestment fuels growth.

4. Hypothesize and test.
Approach challenges with a scientific mindset.

• Test, learn, and iterate
• Develop hypotheses based on data
• Build action plans around these hypotheses

↳ This methodical approach ensures progress.

5. See the silver lining.
Every setback is a hidden opportunity.

• Reframe failures to find their value
• Use setbacks as learning experiences
• Maintain a positive, growth-oriented mindset

↳ Optimism fuels innovation.

6. Place calculated bets.
ROI thinkers take calculated risks.

• Make informed decisions based on data
• Assess the potential upside of every investment
• Embrace the possibility of failure as part of the journey

↳ Calculated risks lead to high rewards.

7. Think beyond the dollar ROI.
ROI isn't just about money.

• Focus on long-term benefits
• Evaluate the holistic return on any investment
• Consider the impact on time, skills, and resources

↳ Broaden your perspective on returns.

8. Lean into your skills.
Trust in your abilities to generate income.

• Use your skills to create opportunities
• Continuously develop and refine your talents
• Leverage your strengths to maximize returns

↳ Skills are the foundation of ROI thinking.

9. Build exceptional products.
Quality attracts investment.

• Focus on creating high-value offerings
• Deliver exceptional results consistently
• Ensure your products solve real problems

↳ High-quality products drive ROI.

10. Systematize clarity.
Clear processes lead to better outcomes.

• Use structured question flows for clarity
• Streamline your decision-making process
• Develop systematic approaches to problem-solving

↳ Systems enhance efficiency and results.

↓

You're not losing, you're learning:

➠ Adopt the ROI mindset
➠ Make smart bets on your resourcefulness
➠ Transform setbacks into setups for success

↓

Business is fun when you play it like a game.

But losing sucks.

If you’re sick of losing.

I’ve got the done-for-you solution to grow your brand and grow your business.

But spots are limited.

Book a strategy call and let’s jam.

シ

♻️ Be kind. Smash that repost button.
💬 Which key shift (1-10) hits for you?

This Only Works If Both People Trust the System

Two people. One base jump.

The second person hooks inline to the first person's rope.

First guy jumps. Second guy drafts behind him.

Both deploy their own parachutes.

Perfect coordination. Perfect timing. Perfect trust.

If either person hesitates, they both fail.

This is what great partnerships look like.

Not the polished LinkedIn posts about "aligned vision."

Not the co-founder photoshoots with matching hoodies.

The real thing. Where your success is literally tied to someone else's execution.

Where their timing becomes your timing.

Where one person's mistake takes both of you down.

Most partnerships fail because people don't trust the system.

They say they're aligned. They nod in meetings. They agree on the vision.

But when it's time to jump, they hesitate.

They second-guess. They want to control everything. They don't actually believe the other person will execute.

And hesitation kills momentum.

The best partnerships I've seen have three things in common:

1. They built a system they both believe in

Not just a vague vision. An actual system.

Clear roles. Clear processes. Clear decision-making frameworks.

They're not winging it. They're not hoping it works out.

They built something they can both trust when the pressure's on.

2. They know their timing is interdependent

The second person can't jump until the first one does.

That's not a weakness. That's the design.

Great partners understand sequencing. They know when to lead and when to follow.

They don't compete for control. They execute in rhythm.

3. They've accepted the shared risk

If one fails, both fail.

That's not something you can fake or hedge.

You're either all in, or you're not in at all.

The best partners don't just tolerate that risk. They embrace it.

Because they know the upside only exists when both people are fully committed.

Here's what this looks like in business:

You're launching a product. Your co-founder handles engineering. You handle go-to-market.

If they don't ship on time, your launch fails.

If you don't execute the marketing, their work goes unseen.

You're hooked inline.

You can have the best individual skills in the world.

But if you don't trust the system, if you don't trust each other, if you're not aligned on timing, you both go down.

So here's the question:

Do you actually trust the system you've built with your partner?

Or are you hesitating at the edge, hoping they jump first so you can see if it's safe?

Because in great partnerships, there's no "wait and see."

There's only: we built this together, we trust it, and we're jumping.

Who's someone you're "hooked inline" with right now? What makes that partnership work?

📹 mateomassoni
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

They Both Asked If the Other Was Okay First

A guy flying down the sidewalk in a drift cart.

A car pulls out of a garage. No warning.

Smash. Direct hit.

He gets up quick. She gets out of the car.

And they both immediately ask if the other is okay.

No blame. No anger. No "what were you thinking?"

Just genuine concern for each other.

They both asked if the other was okay first.

This is what great culture looks like.

Not in the polished moments. Not in the all-hands meetings.

In the crashes.

When something goes wrong. When there's impact. When blame would be easy.

That's when you see what's real.

Most teams don't operate like this.

Something breaks. Someone made a mistake. There's a collision.

And the first instinct is: whose fault is this?

Who do we blame? Who dropped the ball? Who's responsible?

And that instinct kills trust faster than the mistake ever could.

Here's what those two people understood:

The crash already happened.

Blame doesn't undo it. Anger doesn't fix it.

The only thing that matters in that moment is: are you okay?

The best teams I know operate this way.

A launch fails. A client churns. A hire doesn't work out. A strategy falls apart.

And the first question isn't "who screwed up?"

It's "are you okay?"

Not because accountability doesn't matter.

Because people matter more.

And when people know you care about them first, they'll own the mistake second.

But when blame comes first?

People hide mistakes. They cover their tracks. They point fingers before anyone can point at them.

And your culture becomes about not getting caught instead of actually solving problems.

Here's the difference:

Blame-first cultures ask: Whose fault is this?

Care-first cultures ask: Are you okay? What do you need? How do we fix this together?

One creates fear. One creates trust.

And trust is what lets you move fast.

Because when people know that mistakes won't be met with blame, they take smart risks.

They try new things. They move quickly. They innovate.

They know that if they crash, the first question will be "are you okay?" not "why did you do that?"

That's psychological safety. That's how you build something real.

So here's the question:

When something goes wrong on your team, what's the first question you ask?

Is it "whose fault is this?" or "are you okay?"

Because how you respond in the crash reveals everything about your culture.

The collision's going to happen.

Things will go wrong. Mistakes will be made. There will be impact.

The question is: do your people feel safe enough to get up, dust themselves off, and keep going?

Or are they bracing for blame?

Build the kind of culture where the first question is always: are you okay?

The accountability can come later.

The care has to come first.

What's one time someone checked on you first instead of blaming you, and how did that change things?

📹 barragegarage
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

His Mind Created a Reality That Doesn't Exist

A guy hides his right arm.

Places a fake arm next to his left arm where his right arm should be.

Someone hits the fake arm with a hammer.

He screams. Jumps up. Feels pain.

From an arm that isn't his.

His brain created a reality that doesn't exist.

And his body responded like it was real.

Here's what most people don't understand:
You can't trust your brain.

Your brain isn't showing you reality. It's showing you a story.

A story built from past experiences, old patterns, assumptions you've been running on autopilot for years.

And that story feels real.

Just like that pain felt real.

Just like your limiting beliefs feel real.

But it's not.

You are not your mind. You are not your thoughts.

Your thoughts are a record of the past.

They're patterns. Loops. Stories you've told yourself so many times they became your identity.

But they're not you.

You are the awareness observing those thoughts.

You are the present moment consciousness that can choose to believe them or not.

That's where your power is.

Your personal reality is created by your personality.

Not your circumstances. Not your resources. Not your market.

Your personality. The way you think, act, and feel.

And here's the part that changes everything: 
You can change your personality.

Not someday. Right now. This moment.

The constant present effort of being the person you aspire to be is how you become that person.

Moment by moment. Thought by thought. Action by action.

Most leaders are trapped in a personality they built in the past.

They're running patterns from five years ago.

Making decisions based on fears that aren't relevant anymore.

Operating from a version of themselves that no longer serves where they're trying to go.

And wonder why they're stuck.

I’ve learned firsthand:

The moment you become aware that you're not your thoughts, you unlock everything.

If you're not your thoughts, you can choose new ones.

If you're not your past patterns, you can create new ones.

If your personality creates your reality, you can build a new one.

And when you do that, your reality changes.

Because you changed.

Your mindset limits the life, business, and outcomes you can create.

If you believe you're not capable, you won't try.

If you believe you've hit your ceiling, you'll stop reaching.

But those beliefs aren't real. They're as real as that fake arm.

The pain you feel from them? That's real.

But the source? It's constructed.

This is about awareness and imagination.

Awareness: recognizing when your mind is creating a false reality.

Imagination: seeing the version of yourself that exists beyond those limits.

The more you connect with this, the more you unlock your infinite potential.

Because you stop believing the illusions holding you back.

What reality is your mind creating right now that doesn't actually exist?

📹 gettishow
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Was So Focused on Perfect, He Lost Everything Else

A guy laying tile. Big piece. Precision matters.

He lines up the edge. Keeps it tight. Lays it down slowly.

So focused on getting it perfect.

Loses his balance. Front flips over the tile. Lands on his head.

He was so focused on perfect, he lost everything else.

This is every founder who's ever perfected themselves into failure.

Obsessing over the product while the market moves on.

Perfecting features while customers churn.

Optimizing the pitch deck while running out of runway.

Getting the tile perfect while falling on your head.

I see this constantly:

The founder who won't launch until it's "ready."

Six months of polish. Every edge perfect. Every detail dialed in.

Meanwhile, their competitor shipped three months ago with a worse product and already has traction.

Perfect tile. Landed on their head.

Or the leader who:

Perfects the org chart while culture collapses.

Optimizes processes while top performers quit.

Refines the strategy while execution stalls.

So focused on the details, they didn't notice they were falling.

Reality about perfectionism:

It's not about standards. It's about fear.

Fear of shipping before it's ready.
Fear of being judged for something imperfect.
Fear of the market rejecting what you built.

So you keep perfecting. Keep optimizing. Keep adjusting the edge.

And you don't notice you're losing your balance until you're already upside down.

The best founders I know ship imperfect things.

Not because they don't care about quality.

Because they know that balance matters more than perfection.

They know that a good product in the market beats a perfect product in development.

They know that momentum matters more than polish.

They keep their balance while they lay the tile.

Because here's what that guy learned:

The tile doesn't matter if you're on your head.
The edge doesn't matter if you can't stand up.
The precision doesn't matter if you lose everything else trying to achieve it.

Fundamentals first. Always.

So here's the question:

What are you perfecting right now while losing your balance?

What detail are you obsessing over while the fundamentals slip?

What tile are you laying so carefully that you don't notice you're about to fall?

Because perfect doesn't matter if you're on your head.

Ship it. Adjust it. Improve it.

But don't fall over trying to make it perfect.

The market doesn't reward perfect. It rewards present.

And you can't be present if you're face-down on the floor hahah

What's one thing you perfected that didn't matter because you lost sight of what did?

📹 lejulio228
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Knew the Path Before He Got Fancy

A guy on a dirt bike rolls in fast. On a wheelie.

Pulls a U-ey. Still in the wheelie.

Goes off-road into a drainage ditch beside a steep staircase.

Stuntin on the seat. Still in the wheelie. Going uphill. On a narrow track.

Climbs to the top. Non-stop wheelie.

See, he knew the path before he got fancy.

This is the difference between reckless and impressive.

Most people try to get fancy before they know the path.

They add complexity before they've mastered the basics.

They innovate before they've nailed the fundamentals.

And they crash.

That guy on the bike? He didn't just wing it.

He knew the drainage ditch. He knew the climb. He knew the narrow track.

He'd done the path enough times to know exactly where he was going.

And only then did he add the fancy stuff.

The standing on the seat. The sustained wheelie. The style.

Because he could. Because the path was already mastered.

Most founders do this backward.

They try to differentiate before they understand the market.

They try to innovate before they've nailed the core product.

They try to scale before they've proven the fundamentals.

And they wonder why it falls apart.

Progression is the key:

You can't get fancy until you know the path.

You can't add style until you've mastered the substance.

You can't stand on the seat until you've proven you can hold the wheelie.

Fundamentals first. Always.

The best companies I know followed this sequence:

They mastered the basics. They understood their market. They nailed their core offering.

They did the boring work of getting really, really good at the fundamentals.

And then, once the path was clear, they got fancy.

They innovated. They differentiated. They added the style that made them stand out.

But the style was built on a foundation of mastery.

Not the other way around.

Because here's what happens when you get fancy too early:

You lose the wheelie.

You crash in the ditch.

You don't make it up the hill.

The fancy stuff only works when the fundamentals are locked in.

So here's the question:

Are you trying to get fancy before you know the path?

Are you adding complexity before you've mastered the basics?

Are you standing on the seat before you've proven you can hold the wheelie?

Because the path comes first.

Master it. Know it. Own it.

Then get fancy.

What's one fundamental you mastered before you added the fancy stuff?

📹 juan_felizzola_wb
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

Same Swing. 6x the Leverage.

A guy on the tee box. About to drive the golf ball.

But his club is 6x longer than normal.

He swings. Easy. Great form. Minimal effort.

Smashes the ball.

Same swing. 6x the leverage.

This is what most execs don't understand about scale.

They think scaling means working 6x harder.

Hiring 6x more people. Spending 6x more hours. Grinding 6x longer.

But that's not scale. That's just more.

Real scale is leverage.

It's finding the tool, the system, the position that multiplies your output without multiplying your input.

Same swing. Different club.
Same effort. Different result.

Most people are swinging a normal club as hard as they can.

Maxing out their effort. Pushing to the limit. Burning out trying to hit it further.

And they wonder why they're exhausted and the ball's not going much further.

Because they're optimizing effort instead of optimizing leverage.

The best founders I know aren't working harder than everyone else.

They're working with better leverage.

They found the 6x club.

That looks different for everyone:

For some, it's automation that does in minutes what used to take hours.

For some, it's a business model where one sale creates recurring revenue instead of one-time payment.

For some, it's content that reaches millions instead of dozens.

For some, it's a team structure where decisions happen without them.

For some, it's positioning in a market where customers come to you instead of you chasing them.

But whatever it is, it's leverage.

Same swing. Multiplied result.

Here's the difference:

Working harder = swinging the normal club harder (diminishing returns, burnout)

Working smarter = finding the longer club (multiplied returns, sustainability)

Most people are stuck in the first one because they don't even know the second one exists.

So here's the question:

What's your 6x club?

What tool, system, or position could multiply your output without multiplying your effort?

Where are you grinding with a normal club when a longer one exists?

Because the effort isn't the problem.

The leverage is.

You don't need to swing harder.

You need to find the club that turns the same swing into 6x the result.

That's how you scale without burning out.
That's how you grow without grinding.
That's leverage.

What's one area where you found leverage that multiplied your results?

📹 steve.waltman
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Thought It Was Flat. It Wasn't.

A guy walking. Hands in his pockets. Confident.

Sees what looks like chalk street art. A brick staircase drawn on the walkway.

Steps right onto it.

His foot plummets. Drops straight down. Gravity pulls him to the bottom.

Gets up immediately. "I'm fine. Just embarrassed. I thought it was chalk."

He thought it was flat. It wasn't.

This is every founder who's ever skipped validation.

The market looks flat. The opportunity looks obvious. The path looks clear.

So you step.

And your foot hits air.

I see this constantly:

The founder who assumes product-market fit without talking to customers.

The exec who hires based on the resume without checking references.

The leader who enters a market because it looks good from a distance.

They thought it was flat. It wasn't.

Here's the thing about assumptions:

They look real until you test them.

That chalk art looked convincing. From where he was standing, it made sense.

But he didn't check. He just stepped.

And the moment his weight committed, reality corrected him.

The cost of not validating:

You don't just lose time. You lose momentum.
You don't just waste money. You lose credibility.
You don't just make a mistake. You fall in front of everyone watching.

And then you have to get up and explain why you didn't check first.

The best founders I know validate everything.

They don't assume the market wants it. They ask.
They don't assume the hire is great. They check.
They don't assume the partnership will work. They test small first.

They tap the ground before they step.

Not because they're scared. Because they're smart.

Because they know that what looks flat from a distance might have real depth.

Validation isn't about being cautious. It's about being accurate.

Talk to 10 customers before you build the product.

Do a trial project before you commit to the partnership.

Check references before you make the offer.

Test the market before you go all in.

Tap the ground. Make sure it's actually flat.

I’ve learned:

1. Confidence doesn't protect you from gravity.

2. Assumptions don't change reality.

3. And the market doesn't care that you thought it was chalk.

If it's a hole, you're going in.

So here's the question:

What are you about to step into that you haven't validated?

What looks flat from where you're standing that might not be?

What assumption are you making that could cost you the fall?

Tap the ground first.

Ask the questions. Test the assumptions. Validate before you commit.

Because getting up and saying "I thought it was flat" doesn't undo the fall.

What's one assumption you made that turned out to be a real hole?

📹 coldwar. iio
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

The Eyes You See Aren't the Eyes That See

An artist covers her eyes with her hands.

Takes a brush in her mouth.

Draws a face on her hands. Eyes included.

Perfect precision. Incredible detail.

Without seeing.

The eyes you see aren't the eyes that see.

This is what most people don't understand about awareness.

You think you see with your eyes.
You think you perceive with your senses.
You think the face you show the world is the one that's looking.

But it's not.

The eyes you see are the constructed ones.

The persona. The image. The version of yourself you've built for others to perceive.

The polished LinkedIn profile. The confident exterior. The "I've got it all figured out" face.

That's not what's actually seeing.
That's what you want others to see.

What's actually seeing is behind all of that.

The awareness. The consciousness. The part of you that observes your own thoughts.

The part that notices when you're stressed, when you're performing, when you're not being real.

That's what sees.

Not your eyes. Not your thoughts. Not the constructed face.

Your awareness.

Most leaders are so identified with the face they've painted that they forget what's actually looking.

They think they ARE their thoughts.
They think they ARE their persona.
They think they ARE the image they've constructed.

And they lose access to what actually sees clearly.

Because here's the truth:

Your thoughts don't see. They interpret.
Your persona doesn't see. It performs.
Your constructed reality doesn't see. It protects.

What sees is the awareness behind all of that.

The part of you that can observe your thoughts without being them.

The part that can notice your patterns without being controlled by them.

The part that can see clearly because it's not attached to the story.

This is why presence matters.

When you're present, you're not identified with the painted face.

You're not lost in the thoughts, the persona, the constructed reality.

You're the awareness that sees all of it.

And from that place, you see clearly.

You see what's real vs. what's constructed.
You see what matters vs. what's noise.
You see the path forward because you're not blinded by the story you've been telling yourself.

The best leaders I know have this quality.

And that awareness gives them clarity no one else has.

So here's the question:

What face have you painted that you think is the one that sees?

What persona are you so identified with that you've forgotten the awareness behind it?

What constructed reality are you living in that's blocking your actual potential?

Because the eyes you see aren't the eyes that see.

The awareness behind all of it? That's what actually sees.

And the more you connect with that, the clearer everything becomes.

What's one way you practice separating from your thoughts and connecting with awareness?

📹 millybampainti
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

He Was Stuck Before He Knew What Was Happening

A guy resting in his chair.

Two guys walk up. Slide a long pole under the armrests. Above his lap.

Wedges him in. He's stuck.

They lift the pole. He goes up with the chair. Flipping upside down. Spinning. No control.

They carry him around. He can't do anything about it.

Finally released. They run away.

He gets up looking for retaliation.

He was stuck before he knew what was happening.

This is what bad leadership feels like.

You're sitting there. Doing your job. Trusting the environment.

And before you realize it, you're trapped.

It happens in a meeting.

You're asked to "help out" on a project.

Then you're "the best person for this."

Then it's "already committed to the client with your name on it."

And suddenly you're stuck.

Wedged into work you didn't agree to. Spinning with responsibilities you never signed up for.

At the mercy of leaders who trapped you before you could say no.

It happens with toxic cultures.

You join excited. The job looks great. The team seems solid.

Then you notice the blame. The gaslighting. The lack of psychological safety.

But by then you're in. You've relocated. You've committed. You've told everyone about the new role.

And you're stuck.

Wedged into a situation you didn't see coming.

It happens with bad partnerships.

The deal looks good on paper. You shake hands. You sign.

Then the terms change. The expectations shift. The reality doesn't match what was sold.

And you're stuck.

Because unwinding it is harder than enduring it.

Here's what that video shows:

The trap happens fast.

One moment you're fine. The next moment you're wedged in.

And by the time you realize what's happening, you've already lost control.

The best way to avoid getting stuck?

See the pole before it slides under the armrests.

That means:

Asking the hard questions before you commit.

Watching how leaders treat people when things go wrong.

Recognizing when a culture lacks psychological safety before you're deep in it.

Seeing the trap before you're wedged in.

Because once you're stuck, your options are limited.

You can endure it and lose yourself.
You can fight it and burn bridges.
You can leave and start over.

None of those are great.

The best option is not getting stuck in the first place.

So here's the question:

Where are you stuck right now that you didn't see coming?

And more importantly: what are you going to do about it?

Because being stuck isn't permanent.

But the longer you stay wedged in, the harder it is to get out.

And if you're a leader:

Are you the one sliding the pole?

Are you creating a culture where people feel stuck, spinning, at your mercy?

Because they'll get out eventually.

And when they do, they won't be looking to come back.

What's one time you realized you were stuck before you knew what was happening? How did you get out?

📹 rizwan_ali_14
🔔 Follow me for daily insights  🔔
♻️ React and repost if you love this ♻️

シ

We are all in a unique position to help someone.

Are you using your skills to help others?

↓

Everyone has a unique blend of skills and experience.

And if you want to really make a difference...

→ You need to stop doubting yourself.

Here's how to create unwavering confidence:

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽? 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲.

Like when I was juggling a full-time job while building Brain Apes.

Doubts were there, but my focus on my unique skills and resources led to a successful launch and a mid 6-figure run rate within 2 months.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.

Being anywhere but right here, right now is disempowering.

The only place in time that you can think, act and feel in alignment with ultimate potential is right now.

So I love breathing techniques and smiling to get present, remember that and feel gratitude.

(Shoutout the 4-7-8)

It clears the noise, sharpens focus, and brings out the best in me.

It's not just mindfulness, it’s strategic mind renewal.

𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲.

Balance your goals, manage your expectations:

• Set macro goals for the big picture
• Break them into micro-steps
• Get directionally aligned
• Keep showing up

Small steps lead to giant leaps.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱-𝗼𝗻.

I did when I left my 9-5.

Playing small does not serve you, nor the world.

It's scary, but your potential is on the other side of fear.

Remember, great risks often lead to even greater rewards.

𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆.

Each challenge is a chance to practice presence.

Embrace your struggles as opportunities to grow stronger.

My journey is a testament to this transformative mindset.

Everything you want is on the other side of failure.

Fail fast, learn faster.

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘁.

They have the power to change lives.

My mission? To help you leverage them.

I've done it, and so can you.

Stop doubting, start doing.

𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿, 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗻, 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁.

Through action, presence, and strategic goal setting.

Let's build that confidence together.

シ

♻️ Repost and spread the love! ♻️
🔔 Follow Jordan Murphy 🧠🦍 for more.
💬What’s your top skill?

taplio

The Battle

Ryan Staley

Jordan Murphy 🧠🦍

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreRyan Staley's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJordan Murphy 🧠🦍's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Ryan Staley

Jordan Murphy 🧠🦍

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Ryan Staley's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJordan Murphy 🧠🦍's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreRyan Staley's LinkedIn Performance