Hi, I’m Ryan. I help high performers become founders by using LinkedIn to build real, profitable businesses.

My career didn’t fall apart. I didn’t burn out. I finished every role cleanly - Director, VP - leading hundreds of engineers across the world and helping build multiple billion‑dollar companies.

And still, I knew I wanted to build on my own.

I’ve founded 5 companies and earned multiple exits while scaling teams behind $1B+ in outcomes. I loved the work, but I wanted a life where I could build big things and be present for my family. I wanted ownership. I wanted flexibility. I wanted proof I could do it on my terms.

LinkedIn became the path. I grew from 1,200 to 100,000+ followers in nine months, built a brand that opened doors I didn’t know existed, and stepped fully into my own business.

Since then, I’ve coached 50+ founders to design careers, income streams, and opportunities that match the life they actually want - not the life their company dictates.

Here’s how we work:

- Identify the opportunities you can’t see in your past experience.
- Build a clear, practical brand that attracts the right people.
- Turn your skills into simple offers, real customers, and predictable income.

Today, I own my time. I build, coach, and spend my days with my family - and help others do the same.

If you’re a high performer who wants a business that fits your life, DM me.
Partnerships, speaking, press: ryan@ryanyockey.com

Professional highlights:
• 5× Founder | Multiple exits
• Scaled teams responsible for $1B+ outcomes
• Grew to 100,000+ followers in 9 months
• Coached 50+ founders
• Trusted by leaders at Google, Adobe, Meta

Ryan Yockey

I’ve been watching people for years. The patterns are wild.

The loudest person in the room? Usually compensating.

The flashiest? Probably broke or close to it.

The one who won’t shut up about how smart they are? Not that smart.

Here’s what I’ve noticed about people who actually have it:

The strongest are gentle.
They don’t need to intimidate. Their presence does the work.

The smartest are quiet.
They listen more than they talk. They know they don’t know everything.

The wealthiest are simple.
No logos. No flex. Just compound interest and time freedom.

The happiest are private.
They’re not performing for an audience. They’re living for themselves.

Real power doesn’t need to prove itself.

It just exists.

The person who’s actually built something doesn’t need to tell you about it every five minutes.
Their results speak.

The person who’s actually confident doesn’t need external validation.
They’ve done the internal work.

If you find yourself constantly trying to prove your worth, your intelligence, your success—pause.

Ask yourself who you’re trying to convince.

Because the people who’ve made it?
They stopped performing a long time ago.

They just started building in silence.

That’s what I write about every Saturday. One short note to 135,000+ entrepreneurs who care more about real progress than public applause.

It takes 4 minutes.

And its free: https://lnkd.in/gfyweeTM

No noise.
Just the work.

Actionable strategies to grow your audience, monetize your skills, and build leverage online. | Trusted by leaders at Google, Adobe, Meta

The real luxury isn’t making millions.

And it’s definitely not your internet dream.

It’s easy to confuse money with freedom.

Fast cars.
Big houses.
Screenshots and timelines.

But watch closely.

The people who actually "made it"
optimize for something much quieter.

I control my time.
I can choose when to workout.
I dont have nearly the level of stress I once did.

Slow mornings without guilt.
Rested afternoons whenever I want.
Sleep that isn’t borrowed from tomorrow.

And most importantly:

People you love.
Who love you back.

Money can certainly help create these things and more, theres no denying that.

But chasing money at the expense of them usually destroys the very life you’re trying to build.

I learned this the hard way.

The goal isn’t more.
It’s enough — designed intentionally.

That’s what I write about every Saturday.

One short email to 135,000+ entrepreneurs on building work and lives that don’t collapse under success.

It takes 4 minutes to read.

It’s free. Join here: https://lnkd.in/gfyweeTM

Slow down.
You’re closer than you think.

I waited longer than I should have.

Not because I didn’t have ideas.
Not because I wasn’t capable.

Because I kept telling myself I needed:
More clarity.
More confidence.
More proof it would work.

I thought I needed a better plan.

I didn’t.

I thought I needed permission to try new things.

I didn't

I thought I needed someone to tell me it was okay to start.

I didn’t.

What I actually needed was to stop questioning myself.

Every meaningful thing I’ve built started the same way:
Messy.
Incomplete.
Uncomfortable.


The people I know who’ve built real businesses didn’t wait for the right time.
They started before it made sense.
They figured it out while delivering.
They gave themselves permission to start.

Most people do the opposite.

They plan.
They ask.
They wait.

Your competition isn’t other people.

It’s your own hesitation.

Stop asking if you’re ready.
Start doing the thing you keep thinking about.

That’s what I write about every Saturday.

One short note to 135,000+ entrepreneurs who stopped waiting and started building.

It takes 4 minutes.

It’s free: https://lnkd.in/gfyweeTM

Start sooner than you feel comfortable.

The most valuable skill isn’t productivity.

It’s knowing what matters.

Anyone can work harder.
Anyone can move faster.
Anyone can optimize their calendar.

That’s not the edge.

The edge is knowing what not to do.

Because efficiency on the wrong things is still wasted energy.

I see this constantly.

People obsess over:
• Morning routines
• Task managers
• AI workflows
• Productivity hacks

But they’re applying them to work that doesn’t matter.

So they feel busy.
They feel exhausted.
And they wonder why nothing compounds.

Real leverage comes from clarity.

Knowing:
• Which decisions actually move the needle
• Which problems are worth solving
• Which work creates momentum instead of maintenance

Most professionals don’t need better systems.

They need better filters.

Once you know what matters, productivity becomes obvious.
Until then, it’s just motion.

That’s what I write about every Saturday.

One short email to 135,000+ entrepreneurs on building conviction, making clearer decisions, and designing work you’re proud to stand behind.

It takes 4 minutes to read.

It’s free. Join here: https://lnkd.in/gfyweeTM

Keep building.
The right people notice.

Director, Software Engineering | Actionable content for leaders in tech. Software engineering, engineering leadership, online business.

15+ years building production systems. Former Director of Engineering at Oracle, leading public cloud services and working with engineers from Microsoft, AWS, Google, Netflix.

My mission: help businesses and engineers build AI systems that create real leverage.

We're entering a world where AI agents do the work and humans direct. The question is which side of the gap you're on.

Tool user: Prompts ChatGPT, starts from scratch every time.

System builder: Has agents that research, write, and code - creating output while they sleep.

Most AI content teaches you to copy paste. I teach the patterns underneath - so you can build any system, for any problem.

One person with the right systems can do the work of 10. I help people become that person.

What I do:
→ AI Engineer: Community for AI engineers. Courses, resources, downloadable AI projects
→ GradientWork: Custom AI development for businesses
→ Newsletter: Free value every week

📩 newsletter.owainlewis.com
👥 skool.com/aiengineer
💼 gradientwork.com

Owain Lewis

5 AI frameworks worth learning in 2026:

(And when to use none of them):

Here's the dirty secret nobody talks about:

AI frameworks are wrappers over provider SDKs with extra features bolted on.

Many professional developers I respect actively avoid them.

The complexity. The over-abstraction. The breaking changes. It adds up fast.

I call this framework tax: the ongoing cost of maintaining someone else's opinions about how AI apps should work.

Start with the SDK. Build until you hit a wall. Then reach for a framework.

When you do, here's what's worth learning:

1. Pydantic AI (Python)

If you've used FastAPI, this feels instantly familiar.

Types, validation, contracts, retries on malformed responses. Works across all major providers.

Best for: Python engineers who already think in terms of types.

2. LangGraph (Python)

Treats AI applications as graphs, not chains.

Branches, retries, parallel execution, human-in-the-loop become first-class citizens instead of afterthoughts.

Best for: Production systems with complex workflow logic.

3. Vercel AI SDK (TypeScript)

Provider-agnostic with a clean developer experience.

Swap models and build agents with minimal code.

Best for: TypeScript developers building AI apps.

4. Google ADK

The first framework that takes polyglot teams seriously.

Official support for Python, Java, TypeScript, and Go with the same mental model. Ships with observability out of the box.

Best for: Teams building on the Google ecosystem.

5. Spring AI (Java)

Exposes LLM services through familiar Spring patterns.

The value isn't innovation. It's integration.

Best for: Enterprise teams already familiar with Spring. 

The uncomfortable truth?

The best framework is often no framework at all.

The goal isn't to master frameworks. It's to build reliable systems.

Sometimes a framework helps. Sometimes it just gets in the way.

What's your current recommendation?

__

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want to master AI engineering?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e7Ymdh_j

Founder, GradientWork | AI Engineer | I build custom software to make your business more profitable

5 AI frameworks worth learning in 2026

The easiest way to build AI agents in 2026.

(My micro-agent architecture explained):

I built an AI agent that searches YouTube, analyses thousands of videos in seconds, downloads transcripts, writes scripts, and uploads content.

It completely changed my workflow and how I think about "personal AI assistants". I use it every day. 

The whole thing? A folder with some files and about 150 lines of Python code.

Here's the architecture:

1. The folder IS the agent

A Micro Agent is a folder where files define everything:

AGENT md = who it is and what it can do
tools/ = scripts it runs
context/ = knowledge it reads
workspace/ = where it saves files

Point any terminal coding agent at the folder. Claude Code, Codex, Amp, OpenCode. Works perfectly with all of them. 

2. Scripts are a superpower

Software engineers have been writing scripts and CLIs for decades. Nothing new.

But when you give them to an AI agent, magic happens.

Terminal-based agents are exceptional at invoking scripts. This eliminates 90% of the complexity you get with setups like MCP.

No protocols. No complexity. Just stdin/stdout.

3. Skip the infrastructure

The pain of building AI agents is the harness. The UI. The orchestration layer.

There are hundreds of coding agents now. They already have perfect UX out of the box.

Don't rebuild what exists. Focus your energy on what makes your agent unique: powerful tools and rich context.

4. Version control native

Your agent is just files. Share the folder with your team and they can use the agent.

Track changes. Roll back mistakes. Collaborate on improvements. No deployment pipeline needed.

The craft is knowing what you don't need:

Most agents don't need vector databases. Or distributed orchestration. Or complex memory systems.

They need clear instructions, relevant context, and powerful tools that do useful things.

Is this suitable for every case? No. 
Is it suitable for multi user production situations? No
Is it a great way to quickly build useful agents for your own use? Yes.

What's your current setup for running AI agents?

---

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want to master AI engineering?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e7Ymdh_j

The easiest way to build AI agents in 2026

How I use Claude Code. 

7 tactics to make you a power user:

Claude Code is an AI agent that lives in your terminal. People from all industries are using it for far more than just writing code. Imagine it as the smartest personal assistant you've ever had. 

But the tool alone isn't enough. Here are 9 tactics I use daily:

1. Design before you build (think first)

Separate planning from execution. Use plan mode (Shift+TAB) to think through what you're building before Claude writes any code. What's the approach? What are the edge cases? Think first, code second. This is how senior engineers work. 

2. Break big work into tasks (plan the work)

I take a large spec/plan and automatically break it into smaller tasks to feed to an agent. Each includes what to build, why it matters, and what success looks like. Claude executes one at a time with a clean context window.

3. Iterate, don't one-shot (refine as you go)

No engineer writes code perfectly first time. So why expect AI to? 

After any first draft, I ask: "Review this and suggest improvements" or "What edge cases are we missing?" "How would you improve this code?".

4. Save commands you repeat (systematize patterns)

Use slash commands: I have a .claude/commands/ folder. /design starts a planning session. /review checks code before shipping. /commit writes proper commit messages. Write once, run forever.

5. Set up your project brain (configure once)

CLAUDE {dot} md sits in your project root. Claude reads it at the start of every session. Put your tech stack, code style rules, and things Claude should always (or never) do. You stop repeating yourself. Claude just knows.

6. Automate your standards (automate quality)

I use hooks to run tasks on every edit (tests, linting etc). Quality happens automatically. Problems get caught immediately, not discovered later.

7. Document more things (the mindset shift)

LLMs have no memory. Store important context in static docs. I keep a docs/ folder with SOPs, examples of good output, and rules for how I want things done. 

Claude is a powerful builder with amnesia. My job isn't writing better prompts. It's building docs and systems that make every session start strong.

The future of work = humans using AI agents to become superhuman. 

Which of these are you using yourself?

---

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want to master AI engineering?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e_KPUM5S

7 Claude Code tactics

Most AI agents never make it to production.

Because no one knows how to deploy them.

Everyone is vibe-coding great looking demos on YouTube.

But how do you take a demo and make it work for real customers?

Most production AI systems fit three patterns:

1. API service

User calls your endpoint, gets a response.

→ Chat APIs for customer support
→ Document analysis endpoints
→ AI-powered search

Use when you need synchronous responses or human-in-the-loop.

Pro tip: Stream the response. Standard request/response feels too slow for LLMs.

2. Scheduled job

Runs on a schedule. No trigger needed.

→ Daily report generation
→ Hourly data sync
→ Weekly newsletter drafts

Use for batch processing at regular intervals. Set it and forget it.

3. Event-driven

External event triggers your automation.

→ New email arrives, process and respond
→ File uploaded, analyse and categorise
→ Webhook fires, take action

Use when reacting to the world in real-time.

The pattern you choose determines your infrastructure.

On Google Cloud, for example:

API service → Cloud Run Service (scales to zero, scales to thousands)
Scheduled job → Cloud Run Job + Scheduler (runs to completion, stops)
Event-driven → Pub/Sub + Cloud Run (decouples source from processing)

AWS and Azure have equivalents. The patterns stay the same.

That's the gap most people miss.

The engineers getting hired aren't the ones with impressive demos.

They're the ones who can answer: "How do we give this to real customers?"

Which pattern are you building with?

__

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want to master AI engineering?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e7Ymdh_j

3 production AI pattersn

If you want to build AI applications, you need to know how to deploy them.

Most tutorials skip this part entirely.

They end with "and now you have a working chatbot." Running on localhost. Useless for real customers.

Here's what they don't show you:

- TLS certificates
- Load balancers
- Database connections
- Environment variables and secrets
- CI/CD pipelines
- Networking and DNS
- Async work and message queues
- Container orchestration

This is real architecture. Even if a platform team handles it at your company, understanding how software gets to production matters.

I deploy AI applications three different ways depending on the situation:

1. PaaS (Render, Railway)

Push code. They handle infrastructure.

Best for: Side/solo projects, MVPs, "just get it live today."

Trade-off: Costs add up quickly once you scale.  

2. Cloud Platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure)

Managed services with real infrastructure control.

GCP Cloud Run is my default: containerised, scales to zero, pay for what you use. AWS has ECS and Lambda. Azure has Container Apps. All three work - pick one and learn it deeply.

Best for: Client work, production apps, anything enterprise.

Trade-off: Steep learning curve. Each platform has its own approach to IAM, networking, and secrets. Budget real time to learn.

3. VPS (DigitalOcean, Hetzner)

Rent a server. SSH in. Run everything yourself.

Best for: Cost optimisation, GPU workloads, learning how it actually works.

Trade-off: You're the ops team. Security, backups, uptime: all you.

There's no universal right answer.

Shipping a side project? Start with Render.

Building for clients who need scale? Learn a cloud platform.

Want full control and lowest cost? VPS.

Is this the complete picture? No. Every app has different needs.

What's your go-to deployment path?

---

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want in-depth tutorials on this stuff?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e_KPUM5S

How to deploy AI apps to production

Qoder just launched their Teams Plan which brings agentic coding to enterprise software teams:

One of the challenges with agentic coding is working on larger real-world codebases. 

Qoder is an agentic coding platform that can search and reason across 100,000+ files, giving you deeper codebase understanding - not just individual files.. 

I use it as both a dedicated IDE and a CLI.

Here are the features worth knowing about:

1. Quest mode

This is a killer feature. Describe what you want. Qoder generates a spec, breaks it into tasks, and executes asynchronously.

You delegate, walk away, review completed work later.

This matches how we work as engineers: Plan > [tasks] > execute.

2. Repo wiki

Auto-generates documentation and keeps it in sync as code changes. Architecture overviews, module summaries, dependency maps.

3. Smart model routing

Qoder routes to the right model based on task complexity which makes token usage way more efficient. 

4. Teams Plan

→ $30/seat/month (minimum 2 seats)
→ 2,000 credits per seat
→ Centralized billing and admin console
→ SSO for team-wide access
→ Shared credit packages coming soon

Qoder is moving agentic coding from “nice to have” to serious infrastructure for enterprise software teams.

Check it out here: https://aisecret.co/Owain

If you want to get reliable data from LLMs, learn this essential technique:

The problem is simple:

LLMs return text. Your application needs structured data.

You ask for JSON. Sometimes you get JSON. Sometimes you get JSON wrapped in markdown. Sometimes you get a paragraph explaining the JSON.

Your code expects one format. The model gives you three.

This is why structured outputs exist.

What are structured outputs?

A way to force an LLM to return data in an exact format you define.

Instead of asking the model to return any old answer, you give it a schema. The model's output must match that schema. No exceptions.

When to use them:

→ Extracting information from text (names, dates, entities)
→ Classifying content into categories
→ Routing decisions in AI workflows
→ Any time downstream code expects specific fields

If your AI application needs predictable data from an LLM, don't rely on instructions.

Use structured outputs.

__

Enjoy this? ♻️ Repost it to your network and follow Owain Lewis for more.

Want to master AI engineering?

Join thousands of professionals from top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Oracle) and level up your AI skills for free: https://lnkd.in/e7Ymdh_j

taplio

The Battle

Ryan Yockey

Owain Lewis

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreRyan Yockey's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreOwain Lewis's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Ryan Yockey

Owain Lewis

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Ryan Yockey's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreOwain Lewis's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreRyan Yockey's LinkedIn Performance