Samuel Mwendwa

I lead strategic finance for high-growth fintech and SaaS companies operating across complex, multi-country environments.

My core work is simple: help leadership teams make better capital decisions under uncertainty — how long the runway is, where cash should go, and what breaks if assumptions change.

I’ve built and led FP&A, treasury, and investor-grade reporting across 12+ markets, partnering directly with CEOs, CFOs, and boards during:

→ Fundraising and diligence cycles
→ Regulatory expansion
→ Efficiency resets
→ M&A readiness

What I’m known for

→ Turning messy operating data into clear, decision-ready financial models

→ Designing treasury and cash-flow structures that hold up under audit and scrutiny

→ Linking GTM, pricing, and unit economics to actual capital outcomes

Recent impact

→ Extended operating runway by 9+ months through forecasting and capital reallocation

→ Supported a $12M M&A transaction with investor-grade reporting and diligence readiness

→ Built global treasury and finance infrastructure spanning the US, UK, and Africa

I’m most effective with companies navigating growth, expansion, or capital events where financial clarity directly affects survival or valuation.

If you’re hiring a senior finance leader or need short-term strategic finance support around fundraising, expansion, or runway — feel free to reach out.

Group Tax and Accounting Manager

Why subtraction beats growth in capital-constrained startups

In today’s fundraising environment, chasing growth alone is rarely rewarded. More hires, more features, more markets—without discipline—become liabilities when capital tightens.

I’ve seen boards push relentless expansion, only for valuation multiples to stall while burn rates spiral and teams exhaust themselves.

The startups that outperform are those that prune relentlessly: stripping processes, discretionary spend, and initiatives that don’t move the valuation needle.

A framework I apply as a Fractional COO or Strategic Finance Advisor:

Identify activities that generate measurable value—revenue impact, customer retention, or margin improvement.

Map recurring costs and processes, then evaluate what could be paused or removed without harming delivery.

Institutionalize periodic review sessions and link incentives to operational efficiency, not just growth metrics.

The outcome is simple:

Leaner operations → higher margins

Simpler products → faster adoption

Smaller, focused teams → tighter accountability

Subtraction isn’t about survival. It’s strategic amplification. When markets tighten, disciplined simplification is what sustains runway, protects optionality, and unlocks higher valuations.

undefined undefined

Hey [First Name] — appreciate you jumping into the wallet convo!

As mentioned, I pulled together a brief on the latest Dune data + trends shaping how wallets are becoming crypto’s new control layer.

Here’s the link: 

Curious what your take is: are you more bullish on smart accounts, wallet infra, or UX-led plays right now?
Always down to trade thoughts if you're building or tracking in this space.

— Samuel

The hard lesson I’ve seen in web3 is counterintuitive: hype can inflate valuations, but only operational rigor preserves them. Burn multiple and GTM risk aren’t abstract—they are leading signals of whether capital and incentives actually create durable network value. I’ve watched promising protocols command headlines while quietly eroding optionality because adoption and token deployment weren’t sequenced for efficiency. Leadership here isn’t just about raising the next round; it’s structuring capital and go-to-market to compound value predictably under real-world constraints.

If you’re thinking about embedding burn efficiency and GTM risk into web3 valuation, I share actionable frameworks—follow or DM for insights.

nextlify-scale

Advanced Python: Working With Data

Advanced QGIS Analysis with AI and Machine Learning

Corporate Finance Foundations

Excel for Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A)

Finance Foundations: Risk Management

Financial Modeling and Forecasting Financial Statements

International Business and Finance

Power BI Data Analyst Associate (PL-300) Cert Prep: Advanced Reporting in Power BI

SQL Server Machine Learning Services: Python

SQL for Data Analysis

Six Sigma: Black Belt

Strategic Planning Foundations

Tableau Certified Data Analyst Cert Prep

Business Intelligence & Data Analyst (BIDA®)

Leveraging Generative AI in Finance and Accounting

The Role of the FP&A Professional

Data Visualization & Dashboards - The Basics

Intermediate DAX & Time Intelligence

Power BI  Case Study – CFI Capital Partners

SQL Case Study - WOWI Sales Analysis

The course has eneble me to demonstrate creative & innovative thinking in strategy development.
Understand management and organizational theory, and relate this to strategy development.
Identify strategic issues and design appropriate courses of action. 
Provide a basic understanding of the nature and dynamics of the strategy formulation and implementation processes as they occur in complex organizations. 
Understand the essentials of strategy management in a global economy. 


Women Empowerment Link

members economic empowerment and concern to the economy

STAREX S. H GROUP

Fractional CFO | Strategic Finance Leader for High-Growth Startups | Capital Planning • FP&A • M&A • GTM Enablement

As a strategic finance leader and fractional CFO, I help high-growth startups transform financial complexity into clarity—and clarity into action. My specialty is turning operational data into board-ready decisions that extend runway, increase valuation, and drive smart capital allocation.

I’ve built and led finance functions across VC-backed fintech, SaaS, and Regenerative ventures—from zero-to-one scaling to acquisition readiness. My approach combines lean systems, dynamic FP&A, and investor-grade decision support that aligns finance with product velocity, market expansion, and fundraising.

What I Deliver:

Capital Planning with Precision: Burn modeling, unit economics, multi-scenario forecasting, and capital allocation frameworks that sharpen board and investor decisions.

Finance Systems That Scale: Cloud ERP, dashboarding, automated workflows, and compliance infrastructure tailored for fast-growth startups.

Strategic M&A and Investor Readiness: Scenario modeling, audit-proof reporting, and real-time insights to support funding, exits, and GTM alignment.

Recent Wins:

Cut burn by 25% and extended runway by 9+ months through FP&A transformation

Led finance modeling for $12M M&A scenario resulting in acquisition

Built a tax intelligence engine that reduced audit risk by 18% across 3 continents

I’m most effective in moments of scale, shift, or scrutiny—pre-Series B, pre-acquisition, or prepping for a fundraise—where financial strategy is mission-critical and capital clarity drives velocity.

Let’s connect if you're leading a high-growth startup and want a finance partner who builds for what's next.

Strategic Finance & Capital Allocation Principal | Fintech Growth Accelerator & Runway Protector Unit Economics • High-Conviction Capital Deployment • Pricing & Incentive Optimization • Multi-Market Treasury & Payments

Layoffs are often a proxy decision. They feel decisive, visible, and fast. They’re also frequently the wrong first move.

I watched a SaaS company cut 20% of its team to extend runway. Morale dropped. Output slowed. Burn barely changed. The issue wasn’t people—it was the product footprint those people were propping up.

Years of reactive selling had turned the roadmap into a liability. Custom features, marginal integrations, edge-case workflows. Each one small. Together, they consumed engineering time, support capacity, and cash.

Instead of another reduction, we made a harder call: reduce the product surface area.

Every feature was tied to revenue and retention—not in theory, but in practice. Features with vocal internal champions but no measurable impact were sunset. Integrations used by one or two customers triggered uncomfortable conversations. Sales pushed back. Some customers complained. A few left.

What changed was focus. Engineering velocity improved because teams weren’t context-switching. Support load dropped. New deals were easier to explain and sell. Costs finally came down in a durable way.

Cutting headcount treats symptoms. Cutting product scope addresses cause—but it requires accepting near-term pain to avoid structural fragility.

When runway tightens, the first question isn’t who to cut.

It’s what you’re willing to stop supporting—and who might be unhappy when you do.

Why most SaaS & fintech forecasts silently sabotage growth

Copying a forecasting template from another SaaS company feels safe. It’s quick, it balances, and it ticks a box.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: generic FP&A models rarely reflect your actual business dynamics.

The consequences aren’t just imperfect numbers—they’re missed opportunities, wasted capital, and slow erosion of strategic advantage.

Common pitfalls I see:

Revenue assumptions and drivers that don’t match your customer lifecycle.

Expense ratios borrowed from unrelated businesses.

Capital planning misaligned with real operational levers.

A few principles for building forecasts that actually work:

Align with your business DNA – every driver should reflect your customers, churn, and cost structure.

Link numbers to action – every line item should map to a lever you can influence.

Stress test, don’t copy – models only add value when they answer the tough “what if” questions.

Custom models take longer, but they pay back in clarity, team alignment, and strategies that work in your market—not someone else’s.

In today’s capital-constrained, high-velocity environment, knowing where you stand—and where you’re going—is the difference between surviving and scaling.

When the bravest move isn’t scaling—it’s hitting pause

I once worked with a founder sprinting toward growth while the runway was shrinking. Revenue was flat, cash reserves were dwindling, and every instinct screamed: “Go faster!”

I told him the opposite: pause.

Across tech, healthcare, fintech, and media, I’ve seen the same pattern: chasing growth with limited capital is like pressing the gas with the fuel light on. It feels bold—but it’s risky.

Here’s how I guide leaders through capital-constrained periods:

→ Survival is a strategy.

Weathering tough markets preserves optionality and separates resilient companies from those that fail.

→ Pause ≠ standstill.

Use the time to prioritize spend, focus on essentials, and cut non-critical initiatives.

→ Get real about runway.

Forecast cash weekly, know your zero-cash date, and stress-test scenarios.

→ Engage customers meaningfully.

Identify what they value, what they’d pay more for, and where your efforts are wasted.

→ Question growth assumptions.

Is a new market a distraction? Is a feature just vanity? If it doesn’t drive retention or revenue, table it.

→ Communicate clearly and honestly.

The team will follow a realistic plan; investors respect pragmatism over bravado.

I’ve seen founders who hit pause return stronger. They didn’t win by scaling faster—they won by surviving strategically and coming back ready to accelerate.

Key takeaway: slowing down to focus is often the most courageous and profitable decision when capital is tight.

I watched a founder give up control of his company long before the Series B closed.

The dilution showed up on the cap table.
The mistake happened months earlier.

He optimized for percentage ownership while letting time run out. Cash tightened. Momentum slowed. Optionality disappeared. By the time he raised, the negotiation was mostly theater.

The uncomfortable truth: in fundraising, dilution is usually an outcome—not the problem. Timing is the variable that determines everything else.

Raising late doesn’t just lower valuation. It changes who has leverage in the room, which terms are non-negotiable, and how much governance you quietly surrender to survive the round.

Most teams say they’re waiting for “one more milestone.”
What they’re really doing is borrowing against future confidence.

Strong operators don’t ask, “How do we minimize dilution?”
They ask, “When do we still have choices?”

They raise when the business is trending up, not when cash dictates the calendar.
They align capital with value inflection points, not quarters.
They track investor appetite as a market signal, not a vanity exercise.

By the time your runway is red, the decision has already been made for you.

The real question isn’t how much ownership you give up.
It’s whether you raised while the clock was still on your side.

A founder once told me, “Our base case gives us 18 months of runway.”

I asked what happens if two assumptions break at the same time.

No one had an answer.

That’s the risk most teams underestimate. Not that the base case is wrong—but that it’s singular. One version of the future, treated as sufficient.

In practice, companies don’t fail because revenue misses by 5%. They fail when timing, customers, and capital all slip together—and there’s no pre-agreed response.

The uncomfortable truth: a base case is not a plan. It’s a reference point.

What separates resilient teams is not optimism or pessimism. It’s preparation for compound failure.

The strongest operators I’ve worked with do something different. They identify the few assumptions that would force irreversible decisions if they broke—liquidity, customer concentration, funding timing. Then they model those breaking fast, not gradually.

Not to predict outcomes, but to pre-decide actions.

What gets cut first.
What must not slow down.
Who communicates, and how.

When downside scenarios are explicit, execution gets calmer. Boards stay aligned. Teams move instead of debate.

You don’t need to be right about the future.
You need to know which version of it you’re not allowed to be surprised by.

Raising money creates a dangerous illusion: that speed is the same as progress.

I almost learned that the hard way.

After a round closed, every team had a “high-confidence” use for capital.
None of them were irrational.
Taken together, they would have quietly destroyed our margin for error.

That’s the trap.
Capital doesn’t disappear in one reckless decision.
It leaks out through reasonable ones.

The real risk wasn’t overspending.
It was committing cash in ways that narrowed future choices before the business had earned that certainty.

Every dollar forced the same question:
If this works, what does it unlock?
If it doesn’t, what have we permanently lost?

Some bets promised growth but locked us into cost structures we couldn’t unwind.
Others created motion with no path to learning.
Saying no slowed us down—and bought us time.

That trade-off is uncomfortable.
Boards want momentum.
Teams want resourcing.
Founders want to capitalize on the moment.

But liquidity isn’t fuel.
It’s leverage.
Used early, it should increase optionality, not consume it.

Most companies don’t run out of cash.
They run out of room to maneuver.

The hardest capital decisions aren’t about ROI.
They’re about which future you’re quietly ruling out when you say yes.

Most fintech expansion plans fail for reasons that never show up in the product roadmap.

FX is one of them.

I’ve seen teams execute flawlessly on market entry—regulatory approval, local partners, strong demand—only to watch margins erode quietly as currencies moved against them.
Nothing “broke.”
The economics just stopped working.

That’s the trap.
FX risk rarely announces itself as a crisis.
It shows up as missed forecasts, confusing variance, and a growing gap between reported growth and actual cash.

Founders tend to treat this as a finance clean-up item.
In reality, it’s a sequencing decision.

Every new currency exposure competes with growth for capital.
Hedging can stabilize outcomes, but it isn’t free.
Ignoring FX preserves speed—until volatility forces an unplanned correction.

The question isn’t whether FX matters.
It’s when it starts to matter enough to change behavior.

Teams that scale well make this explicit early.
They know which exposures are tolerable, which must be controlled, and which markets only make sense if margins can absorb volatility.
They plan for currency movement the same way they plan for churn or pricing pressure.

Product-market fit gets you permission to expand.
Financial control determines whether expansion compounds—or quietly reverses.

If your global model only works when currencies cooperate, you don’t have a scaling problem.
You have an assumptions problem.

Most founders overestimate how far a funding round actually takes them.

I once joined a company two weeks after a $5M raise. The team felt relieved. Hiring plans ballooned. Vendors pitched extras. Meetings began with, “We have time.”

The reality? Their 24 months of runway was closer to 11.

The uncomfortable truth: runway isn’t cash in the bank. It’s the discipline to turn spend into outcomes. Every hire, every vendor, every initiative is a trade-off. One misstep erodes optionality faster than you expect.

Teams that thrive under pressure link every dollar to learning, not comfort. They ask: Will this spend accelerate our next milestone—or just postpone hard decisions? They kill bad bets early, spot “runway leaks” before they metastasize, and focus on high-impact priorities.

I run a “Runway Reality Check” quarterly: list new spend, expected outcomes, actual outcomes, and whether it’s still the fastest path to your next milestone. The exercise forces clarity, speed, and accountability in a way no bank balance can.

The hardest question founders must ask themselves: Are you buying time—or buying comfort? The answer separates teams that survive from teams that thrive.

I’ve seen founders pitch with flawless slides, high-energy narratives, and stratospheric projections—yet they ignore the most important story: the downside.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: if your fundraising deck doesn’t model what can go wrong, you’re not raising capital—you’re selling fantasy.

Investors reward realism, not optimism. A missed downside case signals either inexperience or unwillingness to face reality. Both cost credibility, influence, and capital.

The cost of ignoring risk is real:
→ Blind growth decisions.
→ Misallocated resources.
→ Strategic missteps that compound before anyone notices.

The leaders who succeed don’t just inspire—they demonstrate discipline under uncertainty. They know: capital is limited, time is scarce, and every decision carries trade-offs. They quantify the worst case first, model levers to respond, and align the team around what survival—and acceleration—looks like.

The point isn’t pessimism. It’s credibility under pressure. Investors, boards, and teams bet on founders who can navigate adversity, not just celebrate upside.

Next time you raise capital, ask yourself: are you showing your business can survive reality, or just sell a dream? Because the difference between a good raise and a wasted one isn’t your valuation—it’s your judgment.

Most companies don’t fail because of dilution. They fail because they run out of time.

I’ve seen founders reject unattractive term sheets while telling themselves they were being disciplined. In reality, they were protecting an idea of ownership that only mattered if the company survived.

One boardroom still sticks with me. The offer on the table wasn’t good. Down valuation, heavy preferences, real control concessions. Walking away felt principled. Waiting felt optional.

It wasn’t.

Three months later, cash was gone. The option to choose disappeared. Employees left. Customers followed. The dilution he feared became irrelevant.

The uncomfortable part is this: dilution is a cost, but so is delay. And delay compounds quietly. Leverage erodes before panic shows up in the numbers.

That doesn’t mean you take any deal. Bad capital can cripple a company just as surely as no capital. Terms matter. Partners matter. Control matters.

But refusing to engage because a deal feels “ugly” is often just another way of betting that circumstances will improve in time.

Sometimes the real trade-off isn’t dilution versus control.

It’s dilution versus probability of survival.

And probability is what boards and operators are paid to protect, even when the optics are unpleasant.

Underpricing rarely feels dangerous. That’s what makes it expensive.

I watched a fintech CEO avoid a price increase for years because churn felt like the existential risk. Costs rose. Competitors repriced. He stayed “customer-friendly.” Revenue quietly capped itself.

The board didn’t panic at first. Then margins compressed. Then hiring slowed. Then the questions shifted from growth to durability.

Pricing isn’t a one-time decision—it’s a compounding one. Every quarter you delay, you train customers on what your product is worth and lock yourself into an operating model that assumes restraint forever.

When we revisited pricing, the hardest part wasn’t math. It was confronting which customers actually valued the product versus those simply enjoying a discount.

We didn’t reprice everyone. We started with new contracts and a narrow segment where the product was embedded in core workflows. Sales pushed back. A few deals slowed. That was the cost of information.

Churn didn’t spike. What changed was unit economics—and credibility. Suddenly the business could fund itself longer. The board conversation shifted from defense to choice.

Raising prices is risky. Not raising them is a slow commitment to subsidizing your customers with your future.

The real pricing question isn’t “Will we lose customers?”

It’s “Which customers are we implicitly choosing to keep at this price—and what does that choice cost us over time?”

The most dangerous finance teams aren’t sloppy. They’re punctual and irrelevant.

I watched a $100M SaaS company drift toward a cash crisis not because finance failed at reporting—but because it was structurally excluded from decision-making. The books were clean. The insights were late.

The business was expanding aggressively: new geographies, multiple currencies, overlapping bets. The board asked reasonable questions—downside scenarios, capital exposure, FX sensitivity. Finance could explain what had already happened. Not what was likely to happen next.

So strategy filled the gap. Optimism substituted for analysis. Europe scaled faster than demand. Currency exposure compounded losses. Forecasts assumed best-case execution because no one was incentivized to challenge them.

By the time finance raised concerns, reversing course meant layoffs and damaged credibility.

The lesson wasn’t “finance should move faster.” It was that finance has to accept discomfort earlier—pushing back on plans that look good in isolation but break under stress.

At scale, finance isn’t a control function. It’s a constraint engine. Its value is in narrowing choices before capital commits, not explaining variance after.

Accuracy keeps you compliant. Judgment keeps you solvent.

The real question for leadership isn’t whether finance has a seat at the table—but whether anyone is empowered to say, “If we do this, here’s what we’re betting the company on.”

The first time I watched a startup hemorrhage cash because of foreign exchange risk, it nearly made me quit coffee. Let me paint the scene. We were celebrating a big contract win. Five countries. Ten currencies. Big plans. Everyone was toasting the international expansion, but the finance team was quietly sweating. I asked the founders if they’d modeled FX exposure. They shrugged. We invoice in dollars. FX risk is for the IBMs, right? Wrong. Fast forward two quarters. Revenue looked great on paper. But each payout landed a little lighter than expected. The CFO blamed the payments processor. The CEO blamed the bank. But the real culprit? Currency swings. Every GBP or INR collected had quietly slipped through their fingers, chewed up by market moves. By the time they spotted it, six figures had evaporated—before the first invoice even cleared. Here’s the dirty little secret: You don’t need to be a global giant to bleed out from FX risk.

↳ Even a fivecountry fintech can see margins shredded. Most founders underestimate three things: → The lag between revenue recognition and cash collection.

→ Just how quickly currencies can shift—sometimes overnight.

→ The compounding effect of small misses, quarter after quarter. It’s not just about volatility—it’s about visibility. If you’re scaling across borders, you can’t afford to treat FX as an afterthought. Waiting until your controller flags a variance is too late. Here’s the approach I now swear by—one I wish I’d known back then: 1. Build FX exposure directly into your forecast models.

↳ Not just a line item, but a core scenario. 2. Set up realtime tracking dashboards.

↳ Use API feeds from your banks and payment providers. 3. Run monthly stress tests.

↳ Simulate 2%5% swings and watch the impact on gross margin. 4. Talk to your banking partner about locking in rates.

↳ Forward contracts aren’t just for the Fortune 500. 5. Assign an owner.

↳ If everyone owns FX, no one owns FX. The day we embedded this playbook, something changed. Founders stopped seeing FX as a footnote. They started treating it like any other business risk—one you measure, manage, and review. Suddenly, that sixfigure loss turned into a line of defense. Margins held steady. Planning finally felt real. If you’re scaling internationally, don’t wait for the first invoice to realize what’s at stake. Start treating FX risk as a strategic threat—and a growth lever. The best operators already do. Curious how fractional leaders approach FX for leaner, faster teams? Drop a comment if you want the full playbook.

You don’t lose marketplaces because revenue slows.
You lose them because you scale the wrong transactions.

Most founders know contribution margin matters.
What they underestimate is how long negative unit economics can stay hidden while everything looks fine.

GMV grows.
Revenue grows.
The board relaxes.

Meanwhile, every incremental transaction deepens dependence on subsidies, incentives, and service costs that don’t come back down. What started as “temporary investment” hardens into the business model.

The uncomfortable truth:
If contribution margin is negative at scale, growth is not optionality—it’s commitment. You’re locking in future cash burn and reducing your ability to change pricing, segments, or incentives without breaking the marketplace.

This is where decisions get hard.

Do you slow a high-visibility category because it never clears contribution margin?
Do you retrain demand away from subsidized supply even if GMV drops?
Do you accept flatter topline numbers to regain control of cash?

Strong marketplaces answer these questions early, when they still have degrees of freedom. Weak ones defer them until the math forces a reset—usually on someone else’s terms.

Revenue tells you how busy you are.
Contribution margin tells you whether that activity compounds or compounds the problem.

Most boards can tell which one you’re optimizing for within five minutes.

Most crisis responses fail because they optimize for visibility, not survival.

Boards panic about headlines.
Founders panic about morale.
Finance teams panic about burn.

None of those are the constraint.

Under pressure, leaders reach for actions that look decisive: layoffs, PR cleanups, revised forecasts.
They reduce noise.
They rarely change outcomes.

The uncomfortable reality is this:
In a real downturn, you don’t get to fix everything.
You choose which weakness gets to kill you.

I’ve seen companies cut deeply and still die because churn was accelerating.
I’ve seen others preserve teams and lose credibility because liquidity was ignored for one quarter too long.
Both were “rational” in isolation.
Neither confronted the binding constraint.

The hardest work in a crisis isn’t planning.
It’s sequencing.

What must be true six months from now for the company to exist?
What decision today makes that more likely—and what does it break in exchange?

Liquidity buys time, but can destroy momentum.
Product focus restores fit, but delays relief.
Optics calm stakeholders, but can mask decay.

Second-order effects matter more than the first move.

Most companies don’t collapse from a single mistake.
They make a series of reasonable decisions that all assume the same thing is wrong.

The question isn’t “What’s urgent?”
It’s: What, if left unaddressed, makes every other decision irrelevant?

Incremental fixes feel responsible in a crisis.
They’re usually a way to postpone the decision that actually determines survival.

I saw this clearly with a SaaS company that lost two major customers in a week.
The board defaulted to the usual responses: freeze hiring, trim spend, delay launches.
Each move was sensible.
Together, they bought days—not a future.

The real problem wasn’t cost discipline.
It was that the existing plan no longer worked, and everyone was trying to preserve it anyway.

That’s the mistake.
In a true cash crisis, incrementalism doesn’t reduce risk—it compounds it.
You keep funding a structure that may already be broken.

The harder path is narrowing early.
Choosing what the company will not be.
Accepting irreversible damage in exchange for time and clarity.

Those decisions carry real downside.
You lose people you value.
You concentrate bets before certainty arrives.
You risk being wrong in public.

But delay has a cost too: it quietly removes optionality.

The companies that survive crises don’t optimize for comfort or consensus.
They align quickly on what must be protected, what can be sacrificed, and what future they’re willing to abandon.

The question isn’t whether the cuts are painful.
It’s whether they meaningfully change the company’s odds—or just slow the countdown.

I’ve sat in boardrooms where a record valuation was treated like proof of safety.

It usually meant the opposite.

The celebration focused on the number.
No one wanted to talk about burn, sequencing, or what had to be true twelve months later for the company to exist on acceptable terms.

That’s the mistake.
Valuation is an outcome.
It doesn’t tell you *when* you can spend, *where* you can spend, or *what happens if the next round doesn’t show up on schedule*.

I’ve seen companies raise strong Series As, hire aggressively, and assume momentum would carry them.
Revenue grew.
So did fixed costs.
When the market tightened, the valuation didn’t protect them—it boxed them in.

The real work after a raise isn’t scaling.
It’s sequencing.

Which investments unlock the next credible milestone?
Which ones only make sense if the following round is guaranteed?
What must be preserved if conditions turn before you expect?

Capital deployed too early doesn’t just shorten runway.
It removes options.
It forces future rounds to solve yesterday’s optimism.

The teams that survive treat cash like a dependency chain, not a pile of fuel.
Every dollar either earns the right to deploy the next one—or it doesn’t get spent.

The uncomfortable question isn’t how impressive your valuation looks.
It’s whether your current spend still makes sense if the market doesn’t cooperate.

I used to believe headcount scaled output.
Then I watched a company spend $11M in under two years and end up with less clarity than it started with.

Demand was real.
The product worked.
What broke was the cost structure.

Under board pressure to “build ahead,” the team hired aggressively.
Burn doubled.
Execution slowed.
Every forecast—no matter how generous—ended with the same conclusion: the business had less room to maneuver each month.

That’s the part founders miss.
Hiring doesn’t just add capacity.
It hardens assumptions.

Once payroll expands, every plan has to justify the org chart.
Forecasts bend.
Rigor slips.
Hope fills the gap.

The mistake isn’t growth ambition.
It’s treating hiring as reversible.

In capital-constrained environments, headcount is the least flexible decision you make.
It locks in burn.
It amplifies coordination costs.
And it narrows your options if conditions change.

The teams that survive pressure don’t hire “carefully.”
They hire conditionally.

What outcome does this role unlock?
What happens if that outcome arrives late—or not at all?
What breaks if we wait?

Saying no to a hire rarely feels strategic in the moment.
Six months later, it often turns out to be the decision that kept the company alive.

The real question isn’t how fast you can staff up.
It’s how much certainty you actually have when you do.

I once met a founder who looked haunted.
Their startup had just raised a healthy seed round. The runway chart looked perfect—24 months of breathing room. Every line item triple-checked. Every assumption conservative.

And yet, the company was frozen.

Hiring slowed. Product experiments paused. Critical investments deferred. The logic was “survive longer.” The reality?

→ Competitors shipped features the team had only dreamed of.
→ Revenue stalled while expenses quietly climbed.
→ Talent grew restless and started looking elsewhere.

Obsessing over runway can backfire. Every month “saved” in cash is a month lost in market opportunity. Windows close. Momentum slips. The longer you hesitate, the harder it becomes to catch up.

Capital isn’t just a lifeline—it’s leverage.

The companies I advise don’t hoard runway; they deploy it strategically. They:

→ Identify inflection points where spending accelerates growth.
→ Burn faster on proven product-market fit signals.
→ Double down on what works—even if it shortens runway.

Survival isn’t measured in months of runway. It’s measured in whether you acted when the market allowed you to.

The startups that get remembered? They bet decisively, at the right time, with purpose—not cautiously, for comfort.

Ask yourself: is your runway a leash—or a weapon?

2X Exits | Built $MM Businesses over 20 years | CEO Coach | Helping founders grow revenue, profit and valuation

2x Exit | Built 7-figure Businesses Over 20 Years | Creator and Writer of CEO Mastery Newsletter

20 years ago, if someone had told me that I would run multiple, multi-million dollar companies, simultaneously, I would have laughed. But here I am.

Over the last 2 decades, I’ve built 2 multi-million-dollar ARR companies and led them to successful exits.

Was it easy? Hell, no.

My transition from an Engineer to an Entrepreneur was hard. 
Being good at our craft and good in business are 2 very different things.

Tejora Technologies was my flagship; I built it to over 200 employees and 30+ clients across the US, UAE, and India, and profitably exited in 2022.

Our systems and strategies enabled me to unlock its value when I was ready to exit. 
I could secure a full buyout and walk away in 3 months because it was built to be cash-rich and founder-free.

In 2007, while growing Tejora, launched Elixir Fitness, diving headfirst into the retail sector. Double the challenges and double the learning. 
 
Successfully exited Elixir Fitness in 2012 to focus fully on Tejora. 
Biggest takeaway? Building and selling a business is an art and a science.

Now, in my 3rd venture —I help founders do the same:

Build businesses that generate profit — and become buyer/investor-ready.

Wealth creation is at the center of everything I do.

Working together, we will: 
- Scale the business in ways that increase enterprise value
- Build a team that can run without you
- Create clarity that successors can trust, and buyers will pay for.

After all, businesses aren’t sold. They’re bought.

So —here are 4 ways I can help you build an Exit Ready business.

1) CEO Coaching & Advisory: 
Work with me 1:1 to increase revenue/profit, maximize valuation, and make your business attractive to buyers or successors.

Book a Free Clarity Call: https://topmate.io/surabhishenoy/1314664

2) Subscribe to My Newsletter — CEO Mastery
Every Thursday, I share actionable strategies on scaling and valuation. This is my best content — and it’s free.

Subscribe Now: https://surabhishenoy.com/newsletter-subscribe/

3) Take My Course — Founder’s Freedom Blueprint
The first condition of any exit? Your business must run without you.
FFB helps you get there — with systems, delegation, and founder freedom.

Get it here: learn.surabhishenoy.com

4) Follow me here on LinkedIn for tips throughout the week.

To know more about me and my story, please visit: https://surabhishenoy.com/from-engineer-to-ceo-to-ceo-coach/

Thank you for being here,

Best, 
Surabhi

Surabhi Shenoy

Growth doesn’t always come from doing more.

Sometimes it comes from staying the course.

A graphics chip company.
A children’s movie.
A sugar drink.

Decades apart.
Different industries.
The same underlying pattern.

The product didn’t change.
The environment around it did.

Distribution expanded.
Infrastructure matured.
A demand wave arrived.

And suddenly, work done years earlier looked like foresight.

This is why some businesses stay quiet for a long time…
and then compound all at once.

The carousel breaks down what NVIDIA, Snow White, and Coca-Cola have in common—and why this pattern matters if you’re building today.

📌 Save it.
♻️ Repost if this reframed how you think about long-term.

Question:
What are you building today that might only reveal its upside later?

--

If this kind of clarity helps you perform better as a founder, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿.

My weekly deep dive on scaling yourself and your business.  

2600+ founders read it every Thursday.  

Join us today:
Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆

#CEOMastery #FounderWisdom #LongTermThinking

2× Exit | Built 7-Figure Businesses | Creator of CEO Mastery | Helping Founders Grow Revenue and Valuation

How NVIDIA, Disney, and Coca-Cola Mastered Market Timing

"Not only can I not pay you the million dollars I owe you, sir...but I need to ask to borrow another one million dollars." said Phil Knight to his banker in 1975.

Nike was about to collapse.

Surprisingly, not because growth failed.

In the early years, demand was strong.
Orders kept coming in.

From the outside, it looked like momentum.

But as Phil Knight describes in 𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘨, the business was carrying immense exposure.

One bank.
One supplier.
Very little room for error.

That tension shows up in far more often than we admit.
Growth doesn’t automatically make a business safer.
Often, it simply 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘭𝘦.

I keep returning to stories like this not as history, but as mirrors.

Studying how great founders navigated pressure, risk, and endurance helps surface patterns we still live with today.

This week’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆, 
I wrote about a pattern I see far too often.

Read it here: https://lnkd.in/e7hYCAPf

I discuss: 
Why founders tolerate exposure,
and how to reduce it before growth turns fragile.

If you’re building and something feels slightly off despite visible progress, this edition is worth your time.

--
If you enjoy this kind of depth, you’ll love 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.
It’s free and trusted by 2,600+ growth-minded founders.
 
Every Thursday: 1 sharp, actionable system to scale yourself and your business.
 
🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇
 
 #CEOMastery #MentalModels

I misjudged time.

Demand didn’t follow when I expected.

After my second exit, I assumed past results would create pull.
They didn’t.

Nothing was broken.
The offer was solid.
The effort was real.

What I misunderstood was timing.

Tomorrow’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter covers:
– why great products often feel unsellable at first
– why effort and demand don’t move together early
– the mistake founders make right before momentum shows up

..and how I generated demand for my services.

If you’re building something good, 
and questioning your direction too soon,
this edition will help you think more clearly.

Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝘁 𝟰 𝗣𝗠 𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗶 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲. 

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week. 

Every Thursday, 1 sharp, actionable insight for founders who care about revenue, profit, and valuation.

Want in?
🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code 👇

#CEOMastery #FounderMentalModels

An infographic for founders titled "Product not selling? Thinking of a pivot?" describing mental models for judging market timing and demand. Includes a QR code to the CEO Mastery newsletter by Surabhi Shenoy for advice on revenue, profit, and business valuation.

The work is getting done.  

But the results ain’t showing up.

That gap is where most founders panic.

You’re building.  
Shipping.  
Showing up.
 
But traction feels quiet.

So you assume something is broken.

It usually isn’t.

Demand is a lagging outcome.  
It forms slowly—then suddenly.
 
It’s shaped by:  
• clear positioning  
• repeated exposure  
• trust earned over time  
• distribution that sticks  
• timing that finally clicks
 
The real mistake happens here.

Founders reset too early.  
They change the story.  
They switch channels.  
They reposition.
 
Every reset wipes out the progress already made.  
And restarts the clock.

That’s the mistake I made after my second exit.
(Yes, even after all the years of experience, patience is not my virtue)

That's why I built a simple mental model. 

It explains what’s actually happening during slow traction phases.

I’ve shared it in this week's newsletter:
https://lnkd.in/eVGHC7e7

It helps you see:
- what’s execution noise
- what’s normal delay
- and when not to pivot

If you’re building something solid but growth feels slower than it "should", this will bring calm and clarity.

—
 
If you enjoy this kind of depth, you’ll love 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.

It’s free and trusted by 2,600+ growth-minded founders.
 
Every Thursday: 1 sharp, actionable system to scale yourself and your business.
 
🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇
 
PS: "The Part Most Founders Get Wrong Under Pressure" section is where the biggest 'aha' moment happens for my readers. 

#CEOMastery #FounderMentalModels

Infographic titled "The Demand Lag Mental Model" by Surabhi Shenoy. It explains why good products feel unsellable early, detailing the 5 components of demand: positioning clarity, repeated exposure, trust accumulation, distribution, and timing. It includes an application framework for founders to diagnose slow traction versus failure.

Calm leadership isn’t a personality trait.

It’s shaped by small daily behaviors.

I used to think calm leaders were wired differently.
More patient. More composed. Less reactive.

What surprised me was this:
Calm showed up 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 I changed one small daily behavior.
Not before.

No strategy change. No mindset work.
Just a simple experiment that made my attention cleaner and my reactions quieter.

Within days, I changed at work and even at home.

I wrote about the experiment, what it changed, and a simple challenge you can try yourself in this week’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆.

If you want to show up as a true leader, start here:
https://lnkd.in/eVFg8Gqb

—
 
Every Thursday, I share everything I’ve learned from 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝘁𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀. 

𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 is my most exclusive content to help you scale yourself and your business.

Join 2,600+ growth-minded founders today.

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇
 
 #CEOMastery #FounderWisdom

2× Exit | Built 7-Figure Bootstrapped Businesses | Creator of CEO Mastery | Helping Founders Grow Revenue and Valuation.

Leadership insight from Surabhi Shenoy on building calm and composure through daily habits. It features a preview of the CEO Mastery newsletter, emphasizing how small behavioral experiments lead to cleaner attention and quieter reactions for founders. Includes a QR code to join a community of 2,600+ growth-minded leaders.

Everyone says: think long-term.

Jeff Bezos says it.
Warren Buffett says it.

I could never really do it.

When survival was always in question — 
when one client could disappear, 
when one big logo could change the roadmap — 
thinking ten years ahead felt almost stupid.

And yet, in hindsight, I scaled and survived for over 20 years through recessions, personal crises, and long stretches of uncertainty.

Looking back, here’s what I realized:

I wasn’t bad at long-term thinking.

I was cautious about growth that weakened the business.
Not anti-ambition.
Not anti-progress.

I was deliberately saying no to growth that existed only for momentum.

I was aggressively 𝗽𝗿𝗼-𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵.

I wanted a business that was financially rock solid — 
predictable, resilient, and optional.

That became my decision-making lens.

So when faced with “survival” choices, 
I paused and asked a few honest questions:

- Is this custom work driven by fear of losing a deal, 
or does it quietly change who we are?

- Am I taking this low-margin client for short-term cash, 
or lowering the bar we’ll struggle to raise later?

- Is this big logo shaping our future, 
or narrowing it?

- Am I pushing hard for a defined stretch, 
or teaching the team that exhaustion is normal?

Sometimes I said yes.
Often, I said no.

All the while, I kept telling myself: 
“I don’t know how to think long-term.”

In reality, I was doing exactly that.
I was refusing short-term decisions that would quietly shrink the future.

I was protecting optionality.

Become pro-wealth. 
Growth will follow.

If this kind of clarity helps you perform better as a founder, you may find 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 useful.

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week.

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆

My long-term thinking didn’t look like Jeff Bezos’.
But it served me well.

How does your long-term thinking look like? Share in the comments.

#CEOMastery #FounderWisdom #LongTermThinking

Image showing text as, "Not all great companies are built to be big.
Some are built to be just great.
Choose wealth before growth.
Strength before scale.
This is a different way to win.
On your terms."
This is an advice to founders to choose to build wealthy companies and not chase growth for the sake of growth. 
Image includes Surabhi Shenoy's branding on X platform.

Not every business gets stronger with time.

Some just get bigger.

I see this often.

Revenue goes up.
Teams expand.
Decisions get heavier.

But strength doesn’t always grow with size.

When I look at a business through an investor’s lens, the question is simple:
𝘐𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳?

Warren Buffett has a short filter.

- Does it rely on debt?
- Does it earn consistently?
- Can it run without the owner?
- Are the economics easy to explain?
- Does the owner know what it’s worth?

That last one matters.

When owners can’t answer it clearly, it’s rarely a valuation issue.
It’s the owner's business understanding issue.

𝗦𝗼 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲, 𝗜 𝘀𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗞𝗣𝗜.

Not revenue.
Not growth rate.

𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲.

It’s quiet.
It ignores theatrics.
It sits on the balance sheet.

But when it rises over time, something real is improving:

- Cash is being generated
- Margins are holding
- Capital is being used with care
- Risk is reducing

Book value won’t move in a straight line for everyone.
That’s fine.

What matters is whether the inputs feeding it are getting better.

Because strength isn’t accidental.
It’s designed.

If you want the full thinking and how to use this as a practical reset for 2026, the letter is here:
https://lnkd.in/e9hsRs-g

—
 
If you enjoy this kind of depth, you’ll love 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.

2,600+ growth-minded founders read it every week.
 
Every Thursday: 1 sharp, actionable system to scale yourself and your business.
 
🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇
 
 #CEOMastery #MentalModels #FounderWisdom

Cheatsheet graphic titled “One KPI for 2026: How strong businesses think about value.”

The image is laid out in six structured sections, presented as colored cards on a light textured background.

Section 1: “The Blind Spot Founders Have” explains that most founders don’t track what they own. Investors track price daily, founders track revenue monthly, but value often remains unclear. The message emphasizes that if you don’t track value, you don’t manage strength.

Section 2: “Buffett’s Simple 5-Minute Filter” outlines how strong businesses are obvious: they have consistent earning power, simple and clear economics, and owners who know what their business is worth. Clarity attracts attention.

Section 3: “The One KPI That Matters” states that Book Value is the signal. It sits on the balance sheet, is calculated consistently, involves no opinion, and when it rises over time, business strength is improving.

Section 4: “Growth Without Sloppiness” highlights that discipline still applies in growth mode. Cash flow is intentional, capital use is deliberate, and unit economics improve. Losses may happen, but leakage is unacceptable.

Section 5: “What Actually Moves Value” explains that value grows from fundamentals such as real cash generation, healthier margins, and lower dependency risk. Value is built, not declared.

Section 6: “From Goal to Design” emphasizes that value doesn’t jump; it compounds through weekly review rhythms, monthly risk cleanup, and quarterly system design. Strong businesses are designed on purpose.

At the bottom of the image is a banner reading: “For more founder systems, subscribe to CEO Mastery. It’s a 4-minute read.” A profile photo of Surabhi Shenoy appears on the left, and a QR code to subscribe to the CEO Mastery newsletter appears on the right.

Keeping star performers felt safe.

But it nearly broke my company.

Early on, our entire operation leaned on three people.

They were sharp.
Fast. Indispensable on paper.

We did everything to keep them close.
Senior titles. Early equity. Growth promised upfront.

We feared what would happen if they left.

Over time, things changed.

Decisions slowed.
Dependencies grew.
Work began routing through people, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮.

Nothing malicious.
Just human behavior.

When a business can’t function without someone, standards soften.
Trade-offs creep in.
Design starts bending around personalities.

What became clear later was simple:
The risk wasn’t attrition.
It was fragility.

𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴.

No accountability chart fixes that.
This isn’t a performance issue.
It’s a design flaw.

We rebuilt by moving the weight.

- Systems carried complexity.
- Decisions moved without gatekeepers.
- New hires stepped in without slowing momentum.

People still mattered.
Some stayed. Some moved on.

But the company no longer depended on who showed up Monday morning.

That’s resilience in practice.
Structural. 
Designed.

What I haven’t touched here is the harder part:

1. Why accountability alone fails.
2. And how strong systems let average performance compound without drama.

Read it here: https://lnkd.in/ebHjX5Be

If you want access to this level of thinking,
📩 Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.

2600+ founder-operators read it every week.

Want in?

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇

Found this valuable?
♻️ Repost to your network
🔔 Follow Surabhi Shenoy for daily founder insights

#CEOMastery #FounderWisdom

Infographic titled "People: Asset or Liability?" outlining 6 steps to building resilient business systems. Topics include reducing dependency on star performers, the limits of accountability, managing churn, and using SOPs to make average people excel.
Founder’s guide on business systems vs. people dependency. How to build a resilient talent engine, scale operations with SOPs, and move from fragile accountability to structural business design.

I took on a 21-day challenge.

It changed how I lead.

Not in a dramatic way.
No big system. No new framework.

Just a small shift in how I showed up, especially in everyday conversations.

What surprised me wasn’t the discipline it required.
It was the side effects.
- Clarity improved.
- Energy changed.
- Decisions felt lighter.

And I realized how much leadership impact doesn’t come from strategy at all, but from habits we barely notice.

Tomorrow’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 breaks this down. 
What the experiment was, why it works, and why it matters more for senior leaders than anyone else.

𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝗯𝗼𝘅.

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week. 

Every Thursday, 1 sharp, actionable insight for founders who care about revenue, profit, and valuation.

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code 👇

#CEOMastery #FounderMentalModels

Leadership insight from Surabhi Shenoy on a simple experiment to improve decision-making and clarity. Preview of the CEO Mastery newsletter for founders, focusing on leadership habits that drive revenue, profit, and business valuation. Includes a QR code to join 2,600+ founder-operators.

I was reading Shoe Dog.

One passage caught me off guard.

Phil Knight describes standing alone in the Sistine Chapel, looking up at Michelangelo’s ceiling.

Overwhelmed by its beauty.
By the scale.
By the genius.

Then he reads something surprising in his guidebook.

Michelangelo was miserable while painting it.

His back and neck hurt.
Paint dripped into his eyes.
He complained to friends.
He wanted it to be over.

Knight pauses and thinks:
𝘐𝘧 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘔𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘴?

That thought stayed with me.

We tend to romanticize great work —
As if it flowed effortlessly.
As if discipline felt inspiring.
As if focus felt light.

It rarely does.

Creation can be slow.
Repetitive.
Lonely.

And yet…

Centuries later, millions stand beneath that ceiling in awe.

They don’t see the pain.
They see the result.

The same is true for founders.

If you’re building something meaningful...
It 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 feel very hard.
It 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 test your patience.

That’s not a sign you’re doing it wrong.

It’s the price of creating something that lasts.

Maybe your creation won’t be admired by millions.
Maybe it’s a hundred customers.
A small team.A niche audience.

If it was built with care, that counts.

Great work is rarely joyful while it’s being made.
But that doesn’t make it any less great.

--
If you want access to this level of thinking, 

📩 Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.  

2500+ founder-operators read it every week.

Every Thursday, get 1 sharp, actionable system to: 
✔️ Grow revenue 
✔️ Maximize profit 
✔️ Increase valuation 
✔️ Reduce founder dependency  

Want in? 

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆

♻️ Repost to help your network
🔔 Follow Surabhi Shenoy for daily founder insights.

#CEOMastery #FounderWisdom

Your team isn’t lying to you.

They’re responding to you.

Not to what you 𝘴𝘢𝘺.
To what you 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘭.

A pause.
A tightened jaw.
That sharp follow-up question you think is “clarifying.”

Over time, the message lands.

𝘉𝘢𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦.

So they adapt.
They soften edges.
They solve privately.
They tell you when it’s too late.

They’re not dishonest.
But they’re well trained...by You.

There’s a famous story from the head of a media empire that shows how this pattern quietly destroys judgment at the top, without anyone intending it.

I broke it down in a 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 edition:
- how leaders unknowingly train silence,
- why success makes this worse, and
- the smallest behavior that starts reversing it

Read it here, "Your Team Isn’t Telling You the Truth":
https://lnkd.in/gxBrgiuF

If you’ve ever wondered why decisions feel harder despite having smart people around you, this one will hit close to home.

--

If this way of thinking resonates, 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 explores these patterns every week.
One idea at a time.
With context, not noise.

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week.

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above to join 👆

Leadership insight from Surabhi Shenoy on how founders subconsciously signal to their teams that "bad news is unsafe." Preview of the CEO Mastery newsletter article titled "Your Team Isn't Telling You the Truth," covering the training of silence and how to reverse it. Includes a call to action to join 2,600+ founders.

“We’re not just buying your company. We’re buying the trust behind it.”

That’s what the acquiring CEO told me when I sold my tech company.

That line stayed with me.

You can’t measure trust easily.

But you always pay when it drops.

The trust acquirer was paying for didn’t come from one big decision.
It came from years of small, repeatable behaviors.
Most of them are invisible on dashboards.

What founders often miss is this:
Trust isn’t a feeling.
𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺.

And like any system, it has components.
When one weakens, growth slows.
Quietly at first, then painfully.

Deals take longer. Teams hesitate.
Customers start comparing instead of committing.

In this carousel, I break down:
- what actually makes trust compound, 
- where leaders unintentionally leak it, and
- how trust turns into economic advantage over time

If growth feels harder than it should, the issue may not be strategy, speed, or effort.

It may be trust... working against you instead of for you.

The full breakdown is in the carousel.
Save it if you’re building for the long term.
Repost to help a leader who’s paying a hidden trust tax.

If this way of thinking resonates, 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 explores these patterns every week.
One idea at a time.
With context, not noise.

2600+ ambitious founders read it every week.

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above to join 👆

The trust equation for business growth & valuation

The internet makes building a company look easy

Building one, day after day, feels anything but.

I have ~70,000 followers on LinkedIn.

People DM me asking for the “magic formula.”

What doesn’t show up on a feed:

- I’ve posted every day since 1 May 2024.
- Each post is an attempt to explain something clearly.
- Often with a cheatsheet that clarified thinking for others.

I’ve written a weekly newsletter for 80 weeks straight.
No breaks. No skipping. No “I’ll catch up later.”

I’ve rewritten my LinkedIn headline over 30 times.

Naming the newsletter took me weeks.
Then I gave up and chose something embarrassingly simple.

My website is being rebuilt for the third time.
Each time for clearer positioning.

None of this looks impressive on a feed.

But something did compound over time:

- Clients told me which ideas helped them.
- Readers showed me where my thinking was still unclear.
- Each 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 edition got sharper because of that.

𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 is where I write about judgment, pressure, and decision-making — drawn from building and exiting a self-funded business each in tech and retail.

Building isn’t a spike.
It’s a long stretch of staying with the work.

👉 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 goes out every Thursday.
It’s written for founders who care about judgment, not hacks.

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above👆 and join us.

♻️ If this resonated, repost it. 
Someone in your network is building without applause.

Question for you:
What’s something you’ve been doing consistently that no one really sees yet?

Surabhi Shenoy, founder of CEO Mastery, sharing the reality of building a business and newsletter through 80 weeks of consistent writing. The image supports a post about the compounding power of consistency and clear positioning for growth-minded founders.

Leaders are told to be confident.

But real decisions are rarely clean.

You’re weighing trade-offs.
You see risks on both sides.
And your team is watching how you handle that moment.

Most leaders get this wrong in one of two ways.
They hide their doubts to look strong.
Or they share too much, leaving team unsettled.
Neither builds trust.

What works is sharing doubt with structure.

That’s exactly what I share in my article:
𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗼𝘂𝗯𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆

Inside, I’ve shared the 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝟰-𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁:
• Share doubts without losing authority
• Get meaningful input without creating confusion
• Keep ownership of the final decision

This approach helps you build a team you can actually rely on during tough calls — instead of carrying every decision alone.

I broke it down step by step here: https://lnkd.in/eEaEASzJ

Strong leadership isn’t pretending to be certain.

It’s knowing how to involve your team 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 spreading uncertainty.

♻️ Found this valuable?
Repost to your network and help a fellow leader.

If this kind of clarity helps you perform better as a founder, 
you will love the 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿

My weekly deep dive on scaling yourself and your business.

2600+ founders read it every Thursday.

Join us today:
🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇

Leadership cheatsheet titled "Share Doubts Without Losing Authority" by Surabhi Shenoy. It features an actionable 4-step script for founders, expert frameworks from 'Radical Candor' by Kim Scott and 'The Coaching Habit' by Michael Bungay Stanier, and common traps like dumping emotion without structure. Includes a QR code for CEO Mastery.

Everything’s working.  
So why does growth feel slow?

Revenue is coming in.
The team is busy.
Customers are happy.

Nothing is broken.

Yet progress feels… heavy.

This is where many founders get restless. 

They start fixing 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨.
New strategy. 
New hires. 
New tools. 
New messaging.

But in most cases, the problem isn’t complexity.

It’s 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸 doing all the damage.

I see this pattern again and again: 
Founders try to improve ten things, when removing 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵 would unlock momentum everywhere.

That’s exactly what I break down in this article: 
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗕𝗮𝗰𝗸?

It helps you:
• Identify the single biggest growth blocker
• See whether the issue is leadership, systems, cash, team, or GTM
• Focus on the one change that actually moves the needle

Read it here: https://lnkd.in/eNMUXx5w 
(It includes a 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹 you can download.)

Scaling isn’t about doing more. 
It’s about removing the right constraint so everything else starts moving again.

If this resonates, repost it. 
Someone in your network is busy — and quietly stuck.

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂: What feels hardest to fix in your business right now?

If this kind of clarity helps you think better as a founder, 
You’ll enjoy 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿.

My weekly deep dive on revenue, profit, and valuation. 
Trusted by 2,600+ founders. Every Thursday.

Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆

Open article: What’s Holding Your Business Back? by surabhishenoy.com

After two decades of building companies, one pattern keeps repeating.

Decade-defining work rarely looks productive initially.

This week, I didn’t have my newsletter ready by Tuesday.
I was working on something foundational.

I was clarifying my 𝗰𝗶𝗿𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.
And the 𝗺𝗼𝗮𝘁 I want to build for the next 10 years.

That kind of thinking slows execution.
𝘖𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦.

Because you’re deciding what no longer deserves your attention.

So this week’s 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 looks different.
It’s a note on clarity, moats, and long-term judgment.

If execution feels noisy right now, this might resonate.

Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝘁 𝟰 𝗣𝗠 𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗶 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲. 

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week. 

Every Thursday, 1 sharp, actionable insight for founders who care about revenue, profit, and valuation.

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code 👇

#CEOMastery #FounderMentalModels

Bad decisions don’t come from bad strategy.
 
They come from lying to ourselves about what’s happening.
 
Richard Feynman had a simple rule:  
Don’t ask whether you like something.  
Ask whether it’s true.
 
That’s a powerful reset for founders—especially at the start of a new month.
 
Before planning the next move, pause and look at last month 𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝘀:
 
Revenue grew—or it didn’t.  
Margins held—or quietly slipped.  
Deals moved—or stalled.  
Your energy rose—or drained.
 
No stories.  
No justification.  
No “but the market…”
 
Clear thinking starts with naming reality without drama.
 
Founders get stuck when they react to mood, noise, and narrative instead of facts.
 
This month, try something different:  
Call things what they are.  Then decide.
 
That’s how you truly progress.
 
If you’re a founder who wants to sharpen judgment and make better decisions, I write 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 for exactly that.
 
Every Thursday, I share one actionable insight, drawn from building and exiting two businesses, that helps you think more clearly under pressure.
 
Subscribe via “View my newsletter” above. It’s free.

What’s one thing you’re naming honestly this month—without spin?

Leadership insight from Surabhi Shenoy on monthly planning and objective business auditing for founders. It emphasizes seeing reality without drama—tracking revenue, margins, and energy levels to make better decisions. Includes a call to join the CEO Mastery newsletter for ambitious founder-operators.

Clarity exists in layers.

Financial clarity is the last one.

In many of my conversations with founders, 
I see that product clarity is sharp.
They know what they sell.
They know why customers buy.

But when the conversation turns to financial strength, things loosen.

Revenue is known.
Cash is roughly known.
What the business truly depends on is rarely named.

That’s usually where risk hides.

Strong businesses aren’t clever.
They’re easy to read.

- Cash movement makes sense.
- Margins don’t need explaining.
- The owner knows which decisions actually move the business forward.

This is how investors look at a company.

Not through forecasts.
Not through confidence.
Through evidence.

That’s where discipline enters.

I use a simple structure for this.
𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟯-𝟮-𝟭 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.

𝟯. 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗮𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱:
- Revenue
- Cash on hand
- One operating metric that reflects real health

𝟮. 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸, 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱:
- Are our current projects improving these numbers?
- Do we need to reallocate resources?

𝟭. 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵, 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱:
- A rolling picture of cash and capital
So trade-offs are visible before pressure forces them.

None of this breaks a business overnight.

It just limits what the business can withstand.

If you want the full breakdown, read it here:
https://lnkd.in/e5t2d7YF

—
 
If you enjoy this kind of depth, you’ll love 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter.

2,600+ growth-minded founders read it every week.
 
Every Thursday: 1 sharp, actionable system to scale yourself and your business.
 
🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code in the cheatsheet 👇
 
#CEOMastery #FounderWisdom

Understand your numbers with 3-2-1 framework by Surabhi

Great teams don't need more motivation.

They need fewer fears.

I've scaled teams for over 2 decades.

My learning is:

Performance issues are rarely about the drive.
They're mostly about doubt.

Motivated people start strong:

- They're energized by ambitious goals.
- They're excited by the vision.
- They're eager to grow.

But something happens along the way:

- The spark fades.
- The energy dips.
- Innovation slows.

And we rush to fix motivation:

- Add incentives.
- Plan team-building events.
- Create recognition programs.

Sounds familiar? :)

Truth is: 
Motivation isn’t the problem.

It's Fear.

- Fear of failure.
- Fear of judgment.
- Fear of not measuring up.

Motivation thrives in trust, not under pressure.
Peak performance happens in spaces 
where fears can’t take root.

The solution isn't adding more incentives.

↳ It's creating space where fears can't survive.

Curious how to make that shift?
I’ve built a framework to help founders create fearless teams. 👇

Save this to audit your next 1-on-1.

Their best work is still in them — 
waiting for the right conditions.

Found this valuable?
♻️ Repost to your network
🔔 Follow Surabhi Shenoy for more

--

Want my exclusive CEO insights delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 — where 2600+ ambitious founders learn to build high-value businesses.

Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆 or scan the QR code.

Leadership framework by Surabhi Shenoy on building fearless teams. It illustrates the contrast between motivation-led strategies (incentives, events) and trust-led performance (removing fear of failure and judgment). Includes a call to action for the CEO Mastery newsletter for founders building high-value businesses.

Which of these 10 fundamentals are you currently ignoring?

In the rush to grow, the "basics" are usually the first thing to be skipped. 
But startup habits break at scale. 

This carousel is a 60-second audit to see where your execution is actually suffering: 

All scaling problems look different.
They fail in the same few ways.

Over the last year, I worked closely with founders at very different stages of growth.

Some scaled meaningfully.
Some stayed stuck despite effort, talent, and long hours.

The gap wasn’t ambition or intelligence.
It wasn’t access to advice either.

The founders who moved forward protected a few fundamentals —even under pressure

The ones who stalled didn’t collapse per se —but they drifted.

Small compromises added up.
Basics were skipped.
Momentum slowed without anyone noticing at first.

I documented these 10 pillars as a way to see where execution suffers as companies scale. 

Slide 8 is usually the moment founders realize why they’re feeling overwhelmed. 

The carousel walks through that pattern. 👇

Save it and refer to it frequently to stay on the path.

If scaling feels heavier than it should right now, it’s often because one of the basics stopped getting attention.

If this way of thinking resonates, 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 explores these patterns every week.

One idea at a time.

With context and solutions, not noise.

2600+ ambitious Founders read it every week.

Join us today 🚀
🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above to join 👆

taplio

The Battle

Samuel Mwendwa

Surabhi Shenoy

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreSamuel Mwendwa's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSurabhi Shenoy's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Samuel Mwendwa

Surabhi Shenoy

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Samuel Mwendwa's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSurabhi Shenoy's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreSamuel Mwendwa's LinkedIn Performance