CEO @GTM Partners | WSJ best selling Author of MOVE | Co-founder @Terminus @Peak Community

10 years ago, found my true passion: Teaching.

1️⃣ Teaching business – How to build and scale companies to win in business.
2️⃣ Teaching leadership – How to align teams for success to win at work.
3️⃣ Teaching life – How to bring work "skills" home to lead in life.

That’s why I combine them all to teach the business of Go-To-Market, leadership, and life.

Built and exited two well known companies (Pardot → Salesforce $2.7B, Terminus → acquired twice).
Written 3 books, including WSJ bestseller MOVE: The 4-Question Go-To-Market Framework.
Created the GTM Operating System, now used by thousands.
Hosted 1,000+ podcast episodes on GTM Made Simple.
Taught 70,000+ students through my LinkedIn courses.

I write daily on LinkedIn around the five core truths about Go-To-Market:

🚀 Trust in NRR.
🚀 CEO owns GTM.
🚀 Systems > Goals.
🚀 GTM is a transformation process.
🚀 Business transformation happens in teams.

175K+ people read my weekly research note on GTM: https://gtmonday.substack.com/
11K+ people follow my personal insights: https://becomingintentional.substack.com/
10k+ people apply principles of going from full-time to fractional to make $250k to a $1M a year: https://fractionalfreedomfriday.substack.com/

To Book me for speaking, keynotes: https://sangramhere.com/ or just DM me.

I’m on a mission to make Go-To-Market simple—for CEOs, founders, and teams. If you want to bring clarity, alignment, and trust to grow your business, let's talk.

Join my MOVE book companion course for CEOs, founders and GTM leaders 
and GTM Operating System Course (Used in two $100M+ exits, rated 4.5/5 stars)

DM me. Let’s build something great—intentionally. Join the MOVEment!

Sangram Vajre

my 15-year-old just closed a $300 deal + $50/month retainer.

here's how it happened.

i told him early on: we'll pay for tennis shoes, rackets, training. but food with friends? you gotta earn that.

when he was younger, we paid him for reading books. never for chores. chores are just part of being in a family.

now at 15, time to level up.

so he went to his tennis coach and asked a simple question: "what do you need help with?"

turns out they run Facebook ads and get about 15 leads a day. but no one has time to call them back quickly.

he said: "i'll call every lead as soon as they click."

now he's learning FB ads. learning CRM. learning follow-up.

$300 to set it up. $50/month to keep it running.

honestly... i'm starting to wonder if college is even the move. or if he should just keep building this.

but here's what i know for sure:

the right kind of pressure makes kids think outside the box.

not pressure to be perfect. pressure to figure it out.

my wife gave me that same gift in 2014 when she said "you have 1 year make your business work or you need to get a real job."

that led me to build Terminus (by DemandScience) to incredible heights and now i am doing the same with GTM Partners.

it's time to pass on the "healthy" pressure and see what happens next.

how are you teaching your kids about money and work?

love,
sangram

undefined undefined

Terminus (by DemandScience)

GTM Partners

Built two $100M+ companies | WSJ Best Selling Author of MOVE on go-to-market | GTMonday Editor with 175K+ subscribers teaching the GTM Operating System

in 2014, i asked my wife if i could quit Salesforce and start a company.

we had debt, no savings, and a second kid on the way.

she didn't say no.

but she didn't say yes either.

after a week of back and forth, she said 3 things that changed my life:

1. "i don't want you to have any regrets—or me stopping you."

2. "i'll get a job so we can pay the mortgage and keep going."

3. "you have 1 year. make the business work or find a real job."

she handed me permission and pressure at the same time.

that lit a fire i didn't know i had.

in the next 12 months:

→ we built Terminus (by DemandScience) from $0 to $1M ARR in 9 months
→ created the ABM category
→ launched 4 FlipMyFunnel events
→ started a daily FlipMyFunnel podcast
→ wrote ABM for Dummies

all because she believed in me enough to bet on me—and loved me enough to give me a deadline.

today, as a 2x entrepreneur, here's what i know:

the people who change your life aren't always the ones who say "you can do it."

sometimes they're the ones who say "you have 1 year. prove it."

who believed in you before you believed in yourself?

love,
sangram
p.s. if you've been in GTM at a corporate for 10+ years, it's 10x easier today than it was for me in 2014 to launch your own thing. do it.

Salesforce

i asked 1,500 people at a conference:

"how many of you are using AI?"

every hand went up.

"how many are using AI to be more productive?"

every hand stayed up.

"how many of you are actually more productive?"

the whole room laughed.

that's the irony of 2026.

we have more tools than ever.
more automations than ever.
more AI than ever.

and somehow... we're busier than ever.

here's what i think is happening:

AI is making us faster at the wrong things.

→ faster at creating content no one reads
→ faster at sending emails no one opens
→ faster at building reports no one acts on

speed without strategy is just organized chaos.

the companies winning right now aren't the ones with the most AI tools.

they're the ones who got clear on what actually matters—then used AI to do only that.

productivity isn't about doing more.

it's about doing less of the wrong things.

what's one thing AI helped you stop doing?

love,
sangram
p.s. i love doing keynotes and saying things no one will say it out loud :)

just finished my 7th CEO roundtable and had a light bulb moment.

every single CEO is talking about AI.

but almost all of them are focused on the same thing:

→ cut headcount
→ automate tasks
→ reduce spend

and then they wonder why nothing feels different.

i wonder if we're looking at AI all wrong.

AI isn't meant to reduce cost.

it's meant to increase value.

cost reduction is a one-time win. you cut once, you're done.

value creation compounds. new products. new markets. new ways to serve customers.

the companies winning with AI aren't asking "how do we do the same thing cheaper?"

they're seem to be asking "what can we do now that we couldn't do before?"

that's a completely different question.

and it requires a different mindset.

not "replace the human."

"elevate the human creativity and capacity."

one CEO paused and said: "i've been solving the wrong problem."

immediately energy came back into the conversation and we went 30 mins over talking about all the positives that comes with adding AI without trying to cut costs as the primary driver.

my big take away: 

i am going to start thinking and advising CEOs on how to use AI to increase value and not reduce cost as a starting point moving forward.

begs the question - which one are you doing — reducing cost or increasing value?

love,
sangram
p.s. DM me if you are a CEO and need GTM advisory related to this topic.

i spent 20+ years exploiting the B2B playbook.

built two $100M+ companies. three best-selling books. thousands of GTM strategies deployed.

and now i'm ready to say it out loud:

i helped write the OLD playbook. now i'm burning it.

more headcount doesn't mean more revenue.
more tools doesn't mean more pipeline.
more activity doesn't mean more growth.

we've been optimizing a system that's running out of gas.

the next era of B2B doesn't belong to the exploiters.

it belongs to the explorers.

that's exactly what i'm unpacking in my opening keynote at Agentic GTM: Realizing Revenue on March 26-27.

the talk: Growth Without the Bloat

here are the 5 BIG ideas i'll break down:

→ revenue per employee and NRR become the only metrics that matter
→ services as a software takes over SaaS
→ generalists will be more valuable than specialists
→ the rise of experienced solopreneurs fueling a new SMB category
→ AI to increase business value — not reduce cost

this isn't theory. it's what i'm seeing work right now.

if you're a CEO, CRO, or CMO trying to figure out what's next — this one's for you.

which of the top 5 BIG ideas are you excited about? 

📅 March 26 | 11:00 AM ET
🎟️ Attend The Metadata.io Agentic GTM: Realizing Revenue Virtual Event
Register now link here:  https://lnkd.in/eZJen_RD

love,
sangram

took me 4 years to figure this out. now i see it everywhere.

CEOs don't pay premium for strategy decks. they pay for clarity.

after $7M+ in GTM advisory,  here are the ONLY 8 things CEOs actually write BIG checks for:

𝗙𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗦 (𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗼𝘀)

1. define your ICP & prioritize segments — stop chasing the wrong customers.

2. build a roadmap around your highest-value products — focus on what drives real revenue.

3. develop a differentiated point of view — stand out instead of competing on price.

𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 (𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲)

4. implement a GTM motions playbook — repeatable plays that actually work.

5. accelerate ROI & time-to-value — turn customers into advocates, fast.

6. focus on data-driven customer and product insights — fuel NRR growth.

𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 (𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲)

7. create an executive GTM dashboard — full visibility, no surprises.

8. align teams with clarity & trust — move faster, execute better.

notice what's NOT on this list?

more leads. more content. more tools.

CEOs at $10M–$100M don't need more. they need less — with more precision.

which of these 8 is your company struggling with most right now?

love,
sangram

p.s. our 100+ GTM OS Certified partners solve these 8 problems daily for CEOs from startups to billion dollar companies. if you need help, check out GTMarketplace or just dm me.

a CEO of an $11M company asked me last week:

"we're growing 30% a year. why does it feel like we're running in place?"

i asked one question: "what's your NRR?"

she paused. "i think it's around 90%."

that's the problem.

here's the math most CEOs don't run:

→ 90% NRR: you lose 10% of your revenue every year. you need 40% new business just to grow 30%. you're filling a leaky bucket.

→ 110% NRR: your existing customers grow 10% on their own. now you only need 20% new business to hit the same 30% growth.

→ 120% NRR: your customers are doing the heavy lifting. new logos become gravy, not survival.

same growth target. completely different effort.

most CEOs at this stage are obsessed with new logos. i get it. new logos feel like progress.

but the companies that scale aren't the ones with the best sales teams.

they're the ones where customers stay, expand, and refer.

NRR isn't a CS metric. it's a GTM metric.

if your marketing and sales teams aren't thinking about retention and expansion, you're leaving the easiest revenue on the table.

her response: "i've been solving the wrong problem."

do you know your NRR?

love,
sangram
p.s. building a GTMarketplace with 100+ certified GTM partners who are solving these problems daily for CEOs.

when you work for a company, every competitor becomes your enemy.

when you go fractional, every other fractional becomes your homie.

meet Matt Anthony and Stacy Sutton.

both are successful GTM leaders. both are GTM OS Certified Partners building profitable businesses. both are in ATL.

so what do they do? they meet up. they build together.

this is what happens when you shift from W2 to 1099.

something changes in your mindset.

you stop seeing other people in your space as threats. you start seeing them as allies.

but here's the thing no one talks about:

going fractional can get lonely. really lonely.

you leave the meetings, the Slack channels, the water cooler. you're on your own.

and then you find others doing the same thing.

now with 100+ GTM OS partners across the globe, i see this happening all the time.

people meeting up. sharing deals. building businesses together.

people ask me: "what's the ROI of building this community?"

my answer: a big smile on my face.

that's the ROI.

did i go overboard with the word "homie" here?

love,
sangram
p.s. follow Matt Anthony and Stacy Sutton for each of them are building an incredible practice to help CEOs fix and scale their GTM, fast.

last week, our GTM OS fractionals closed over $1M.

not in a quarter. in one week.

how? they follow the same system: brand, demand, delivery.

→ brand: they don't look like every other fractional. they use GTM OS certified research and process to stand out from the sea of consultants who aren't really building a business.

→ demand: they show CEOs exactly what they'll get. no fluff. outcome-based frameworks that make the value obvious before the first call.

→ delivery: with 100+ certified partners and data from 1000+ companies running on GTM OS, everything they do is already battle-tested. no guessing. no improvising. A+ delivery from day one.

most fractionals are winging it alone.

building their own decks. creating their own frameworks. hoping it works.

our partners don't have to.

they walk into every engagement with a system that's been pressure-tested across industries, stages, and company sizes.

this is why i love this community.

you don't have to figure it out by yourself.

you don't have to compete on price.

you don't have to feel like "just another consultant."

you get to build a real business — with a real system — alongside people who are doing the same thing.

this is the best time to go all in on building a fractional business... if you have 10+ years of GTM experience.

love,
sangram
p.s. throwback picture from GTM Made Simple roadshow

in 2024, we had 3 GTM OS Certified Partners.

today? almost 100. across 3 continents.

but the numbers aren't what got me this week.

it's this photo.

Shelli Ryan, APR, Fellow PRSA and Melanie J. Lennert-Anliker on stage in Dubai sharing our new research and building a profitable GTM business.

at the same time—same week—

GTM OS sessions running in the UK - Abbas Shivji Navin Jaitly - leading the way!

another in Sydney, Australia - Sue Foley, i see you!

 in Canada - Murtaza Kumail Abbas, you are killing it brother!

in San Francisco - Lydia Flocchini and Tim Hillison doing joint roundtables

Bryan Brown and i just looked at each other like... is this real?

we didn't build a course.

we get to build a MOVEment.

→ 3 partners → 100 partners
→ 1 county → 3 continents
→ 0 businesses on GTM OS → over 1,000 today

and now GTMarketplace has the leading marketing and sales execs ready to take control of their careers.

here's what i've learned:

you don't scale a framework by selling it.

you scale it by giving people something worth teaching.

the partners aren't just certified. they're invested. they're on stages. they're in rooms we'll never be in. they're reaching companies we'll never meet.

that's not a business model.

that's a belief system.

to every GTM OS partner out there—thank you.

you made this real.

who's someone in your world building something bigger than themselves right now?

love,
sangram

CEO @ Ad Hoc | Veteran Cross-border Go-to-Liquidity™ & Go-to-Market Operator, specialty in improved EBITDA quality and non-rep dependent revenue programs that create results in 90 days

CEO & Co-Founder CRO2go | Fractional CRO & Board Director | Scaling B2B SaaS & FinTech Revenue Across Europe | INSEAD Board Programme | Pioneering fractional leadership model | Speaker

Helping £1M–£10M Life Sciences, HealthTech & SaaS founders turn messy traction into predictable revenue | Fractional CRO | GTM Partner & Advisor

GTM Certified Advisor and Sales Specialist / Fixing Stalled Growth, in B2B Growth Focused Companies/ Best - Selling Author and International Speaker

Entrepreneur | CMO | Strategist | GTM Advisor & GTM OS Certified Partner

All Things GTM | Fractional Revenue Leader | Dad x 3

Legal Tech Category Designer & Leader | Fractional GTM Operator & Advisor | Creator of Legal Tech Revenue Science™ + Motion to Scale™ | 5× GTM Growth & Exits | Multi-GTM Awards| ILTA Influential Woman in Legal Tech

Turning Lumpy Revenue into Predictable Growth | Global GTM Operator + Engineer | FlexScale & FullStack GTM for Engineering-Led Scaleups | $1B+ Impact | Ex-Visa, Microsoft, PayPal | #gotimmarket

Transform your GTM & align your teams with our GTM O.S. framework & certification

***Hot take *** every company is about to land in one of three places.

and your GTM strategy depends on which one you're in.

𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝟭: 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁-𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 (Competition zone)

you compete on efficiency or necessity. your product gets cheaper every day. AI and automation are compressing your margins.

GTM here = speed to market, volume, low-touch sales. you win on distribution, not differentiation.

𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝟮: 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿-𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 (Winning Zone)

you compete on transformation. your customers don't just use your product — they become something different because of it. you get overvalued every day.

GTM here = outcomes, stories, premium pricing. you win on depth, not reach.

𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝟯: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗱𝗱𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝗱𝗱𝗹𝗲 (Instability Zone)

you're not the cheapest. you're not the most transformational. you're just... there.

GTM here = competing on everything, winning on nothing. no clear positioning. no pricing power. no moat.

this is where most companies go to die.

the hard truth?

most GTM teams are building playbooks for lane 2 while their company is stuck in lane 3.

or worse — they're in lane 1 and pretending they're in lane 2.

the first job of any GTM leader is to get honest about which lane you're actually in.

then build the strategy that fits.

which lane is your company in right now?

love,
sangram

time for a reintroduction.

most of you know me as the Terminus guy. the ABM guy. the author of a few books.

but here's what i get to do now — and honestly, it's something i could only dream of.

i get to help people turn 10+ years of GTM experience into a real business.

not a side hustle. not "consulting between jobs." a real, sustainable business.

i've been doing this on and off for 5 years. but in the last year, Bryan Brown  and i have done it 100 times.

100 GTM leaders. building $250K–$500K+ practices. working with startups and PE firms who actually value their expertise.

just last week, was our first $1M week with a few certified partners (fractionals) sharing their wins in the community. 

this is the new reality.

so here's what i've learned:

the skills you built climbing someone else's ladder? they're worth more than you think.

but it only works if you're serious about it.

this isn't for people looking for a backup plan.

it's for people ready to bet on themselves.

so if you've gone fractional /solo — or you're thinking about it — i want to help.

and if you know someone who fits that description, tag them or send them my way.

this is the work i am meant to do right now.

thank you for supporting the GTMovement!

if you want to share the word, pls repost it.

love,
sangram

"We've been running on EOS for 10 years. When I saw GTM OS, it immediately clicked—it's the missing operating system for go-to-market." that's what Eric Baum, CEO of Bluleadz told me last week. 

Eric runs a very successful agency on HubSpot and EOS Worldwide.

he's seen what works and what doesn't. and his take got me thinking about why so many EOS companies still struggle with revenue.

EOS gives you operational discipline. 

→ rocks 
→ scorecards 
→ accountability 
→ meeting rhythms 

but EOS doesn't tell you how to go to market. 

it doesn't answer: 

→ who's your real ICP? 
→ what's your positioning? 
→ how do marketing, sales, and CS actually align? 
→ where's the pipeline breaking down? 

that's the gap GTM OS fills. 

EOS runs the company. 
GTM OS runs the revenue engine.

most companies have one or the other. 

few have both working together. 

but when they do? that's when things start compounding. 

Eric's seeing it with his clients — the ones running both systems are moving faster and with more clarity than the ones trying to figure out GTM on their own. 

if you're already on EOS and feel like go-to-market is the missing piece — this might be worth exploring. 

are you running both or just one? 

love, 
sangram 
p.s. shoutout to Eric Baum for the insight — always learn from people doing it in the field.

in 20 mins… i am doing a keynote called “Growth without bloat” 

why i am excited:

1. brand new research from 1000+ companies and over 100 CEO conversations since beginning of this year

2. new model showing the gap in B2B worldview and real worldview when it comes to go-to-market

3. 8 ideas that will cost $0 to create more revenue and will make your CEO scratch their heads.

so wish me best and see you soon!

it’s hosted by Lisa Sharapata and Gil Allouche at Metadata 

let’s go!

love,
sangram 
p.s. if you want slides just comment “growth” and my EA will dm you… i think that’s how you go viral 🫣

No alternative text description for this image

i spent 35 years believing the biggest risk was becoming an entrepreneur. i had it completely backwards.

before that? i thought the only way to build something meaningful was living paycheck to paycheck. climbing someone else's ladder. hoping for the next promotion.

today, i think that's the greatest myth — especially if you have 10+ years of experience.

here's what nobody tells you:

you already know what it takes to build a business.

you've built pipelines. you've closed deals. you've led teams. you've driven revenue.

you just did it for someone else.

and no — you don't need to raise money. you don't need a $100M company to call yourself an entrepreneur or soloprenuer. you don't even need a software idea.

what you need is to make a meaningful living on your terms.

when i see CMOs and CROs working 60-70 hours a week, grinding for 1-2 years, and then back on the job hunt... it breaks my heart.

why not have 2-4 clients instead of one employer?

why not diversify your income so you're never at the mercy of one company's next layoff?

why not leverage 20 years of experience AND have fun doing it?

the risk isn't going out on your own.

the risk is waiting too long to start.

am i wrong?

love,
sangram
p.s. "the tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it." — William Mather Lewis

looking for 3-5 AI-powered GTM tools to introduce to our 100+ GTM OS Certified partners and agencies.

here's why this matters:

there are 10,000+ GTM AI tools out there. buyers have no idea what's actually good.

too much noise. too many demos. too little trust.

so how do people actually decide what to buy?

they ask someone they trust.

our 100+ partners are building $250K-$500K+ fractional businesses all over the world. each one works with 3-5 clients at a time.

that's 300-500 companies in this ecosystem right now.

here's the deal:

→ give our partners access to your tech
→ they recommend it to clients when it fits
→ they earn a commission on referrals
→ they post about it on LinkedIn (real usage, not paid ads)

this isn't influencer marketing.

it's micro-advisor distribution.

trusted people recommending tools they actually use to clients who actually need them.

no cold outreach. no ad fatigue. no "request a demo" forms.

just warm introductions from people who've already earned trust.

i think this is how B2B buying is going to work moving forward.

not more ads. more trusted advisors.

if you're building AI-powered GTM tech and this sounds interesting — DM me "PARTNER" and let's talk.

love,
sangram

p.s. we have a rigorous process so if you can't handle an influx of deals yet, hold off for now.

just wrapped a LIVE workshop with 25 GTM leaders who want to go fractional.

4 hours. no fluff. just the real stuff.

here's what we covered:

𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘀𝗲𝘁
→ why you and why now?
→ 3 ways to build a fractional business
→ 8 outcomes CEOs actually pay for
→ 15 limiting beliefs holding you back

𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
→ build your LinkedIn and define your ICP
→ set up your tech stack and funnel
→ create a content strategy for consistency
→ sell through frameworks — outcomes, not hours

𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀
→ how to land 1-3 clients in 90 days
→ the 10-week challenge to make it real

this is the system our 100+ GTM OS partners use to build $250K–$500K+ practices.

not theory. not motivation. a real playbook.

if you're thinking about going fractional — or already started and feeling stuck — i want to help.

comment "GTM" and my EA send you the entire deck starting Friday.

plus i am included a recording in which i will show how we built a $7M advisory using this process. no silver bullet - just consistently doing what only 1% would do. 

who is this NOT for: in between jobs or not serious about building a $250k+ business or having less than 10+ years of marketing/sales/CMO/CRO experience. 

comment "GTM"... let's go!

love,
sangram
p.s. thank you Aby Varma for having me + Stacy Sutton and Matt Anthony for being there as GTM OS Certified Partners doing this for real!

how do you make $500K consistently as a fractional CMO/CRO leader?

not once. not in a lucky year. but predictably.

it's a math problem, not a motivation problem.

here are the 3 models i see working:

→ model 1: 4 retainers at $10K/month = $480K

→ model 2: 3 retainers + 2 strategic projects at $50K each = $460K–$500K

→ model 3: 2 PE-backed clients at $20K/month = $480K

$500K is not about 12 clients. it's about 2–4 serious ones.

but here's what separates $250K fractionals from $500K fractionals:

$250K fractionals sell execution — content, ads, HubSpot management.

$500K fractionals sell architecture — revenue design, GTM resets, alignment across marketing + sales + product.

execution scales down. architecture scales up.

the other difference? specificity.

generic fractionals cap at $250K.

the ones crossing $500K have a wedge:

→ post-Series A pipeline resets
→ PE-backed revenue acceleration
→ ABM for $100M+ portfolios

and the hard truth?

$500K requires selling. confidently. at that level.

many people can do the work. few are willing to price it.

if you don't sell, they can't buy.

which model are you running right now?

love,
sangram
p.s. we now have 100 GTM OS Certified Partners doing this and just celebrated several folks crossing this milestone on our Monday Mastermind. if you want to join the MOVEment, just  dm me.

a partner at a $10B PE firm asked me last week:

"what's the hourly rate for a fractional CMO?"

my answer: "don't be a hammer looking for nails."

she's trying to help her portfolio companies scale with "just in time" hiring instead of full-time execs. smart move. but she was thinking about it wrong.

here's what i told her:

we're shifting from "knowledge workers" to "wisdom workers."

knowledge workers get paid for what they know.
wisdom workers get paid for the outcomes they create.

the best fractional GTM leaders i know don't charge by the hour. they charge by the transformation.

and this shift is happening fast.

→ fractional CFOs normalized it first. companies realized they didn't need a full-time finance exec—they needed outcomes.

→ Fiverr normalized it at the entry level. millions of people building income without a boss.

→ now it's happening in GTM.

for the first time, marketing and sales leaders with 10+ years of experience are building $300K–$500K practices.

not consulting gigs.

not "between jobs" work.

real businesses.

when Bryan Brown and i started the GTM advisory business in 2021, we were figuring this out as we went. today? it's a proven path.

the old model: charge by the hour, compete on rate, get commoditized.

the new model: charge by the outcome, compete on wisdom, build a real business.

this isn't a trend.

it's a reset.

if you've been thinking about making the leap, check out GTMarketplace — 100+ GTM leaders already building $300K+ practices. link in comments.

love,
sangram
p.s. dm me if you want to be on this GTMarketplace only if you have 10+ years of marketing/sales/GTM experirence.

Fiverr

the US lost 92,000 jobs in February. badly missing estimates of 55,000 payroll additions. unemployment rose to 4.4%.

at the same time, fractionals in our GTM OS community had a record week (not just a month) — generating over $1M in just one week.

same economy. different outcomes.

one group is waiting for permission.

the other group built their own.

i'm not saying fractional is for everyone. it's not.

but if you've spent 10+ years in GTM, built pipeline, led teams, and delivered results for others... 

then it begs the obvious question...

why are you still waiting for someone else to decide your future?

the economy doesn't care about your resume.

but your skills? your network? your ability to deliver outcomes?

those are yours. no one can lay those off.

the shift from W2 to 1099 isn't just a tax change.

it's a mindset change.

from "i need a job" to "i am the job."

what do you think is going to happen in 2026 to your job?

love,
sangram

Build Your B2B Content Strategy with my Course

In 2022, I bootstrapped an agency to $1M in 14 months, and sold it in 2023. During this time, I went from 'growth marketer' to 'content marketer' for 1 simple reason: 

B2B buyers educate themselves with content before buying.

- They prefer to discover you with a LinkedIn post
- Then watch a 10-min youtube explaining your POV
- Or reading a newsletter about an in-depth case study

That's how they buy, and you need to adapt.

So you need to create content but the goal is not to become a pop star.

You don't want to follow this weird model where you publish 'engaging stories' and then 'funnel down' people to middle of funnel content.

What you want is to position yourself and your business as an industry authority.

That's why I created the authority-first framework.

To help B2B businesses create content that attract buyers.

- Check out our website here: contentpath.co
- Or you can DM me directly to start working together.

Pierre Herubel

B2B and B2C marketing have one BIG difference:

(Yet many marketers think they're "similar")

The buying decision process is completely different.

In B2B:

- Multiple stakeholders with different roles and objectives.
- They collaborate in a shared "buying project";
- To purchase a solution that will drive ROI.

In B2C:

- One buyer or a small group of relatives;
- Aligned around a single decision.
- So they can decide faster.

As a result, the entire marketing job is different:

- The audience you target
- The message you share
- The content you create
- And how you distribute it

So you're either a B2B marketer, or a B2C marketer.

That said, there are of course common foundations:

- The need for targeting, value proposition, and messaging.
- The importance of a clear market positioning and brand.
- The mandatory social proof, trust, and external reviews.

And in the latest years, we've seen B2B getting closer to B2C;

- Rise of social media and communities as decision hubs;
- More room to influencer marketing and thought leadership;
- And the line between B2B and B2C is fading for solopreneurs.

What other similarities do you see between B2B and B2C marketing?

I help B2B businesses get clients with content

This question will shape your B2B strategy in 2026:

(It impacts your offer, hires, and budget)

"Do you want to build a marketing-led or a sales-led system?"

Here's the difference:

1/Marketing-led 

The efforts are mainly on marketing actions (content, ads, emails...). So you need an offer that is easier to sell and requires fewer 1:1 conversations. 

You maximize the volume of interactions with your ICP and create a frictionless first sale. It's ideal if you target SMEs, midmarket and sell an MRR offer.

2/Sales-led

The efforts are mainly on sales actions (BDR, proposals, calls...). You spend a lot of time in 1:1 conversations but have a high-ticket offer that makes this profitable. 

You maximize the $ACV and $LTV of each deal but spend a lot of time in actions that "don't scale". It's ideal if you target upmarket and enterprises (or if you're in a vertical niche).

So the answer to this question is crucial.

It impacts everything else:

- Your offer: do you want a frictionless MRR offer or a high-ticket offer that requires long sales cycles?

- Your ICP: do you prefer to target midmarket or enterprises? (to be exact, your ICP affects the decision and you can later expand to another ICP with a secondary motion)

- Your day-to-day: do you want to spend your time optimizing 1:1 sales conversations or 1:many marketing actions?

- It also impacts your hires (sales or marketers?), your budget, your energy, your agenda...

I chose a marketing-led approach for my business.

It fits my personality and my skills as a founder.

We still do sales calls, but the heavy lifting is done by content and marketing.

Many founders confuse marketing strategy with tactics:

- They think "running ads" is a strategy;
- They think "posting daily" is a strategy;
- They think "doing webinars" is a strategy.

Because of this confusion, they don't have a high level plan.

- Who are we helping;
- For what problem;
- How we solve it differently;
- And what do we say.

As a result, they lack focus and direction.

- "Let's try this new channel!"
- "I read about a new automation hack!"
- "We don't want to miss this opportunity"

And it puts the business into a reactive posture:

No clear direction → Something external happens → We react to it → We try a new tactic → Intensify the lack of direction

To get out of this reactive marketing loop, you need to:

Distinguish strategy from tactics.

1. Strategy comes first: It's the high-level plan that guides how to achieve revenue goals.

2. Tactics come second: It's the specific actions and methods used to execute the strategy.

And don't forget the feedback loop between them.

Tactics' results always inform the strategic decisions.

Follow me Pierre Herubel for daily marketing tips.

Biggest mistake I see in B2B revenue strategy:

(Read this to increase your revenue in 2026)

Focusing only on adding new qualified opportunities to the pipeline...

...when the sales and upsell systems are inefficient.

Let's call it the "pierced basket syndrome".

Here's what happens:

1. You get leads through marketing and SDRs actions (content, ads, outbound...)

2. But the sales system is not efficient (low closing rate and low initial contract value)

3. And the upsell system is not efficient or nonexistent (low number of upsells and customer lifetime value is not maximized)

As a result, the business is leaking potential revenue.

That's a pierced basket.

Now, here's how to fix the leak.

1. Acknowledge these 2 rules of sales

- Rule 1: It's easier to close a qualified prospect you're already in conversation with than to find a new one from scratch.

- Rule 2: You're far more likely to make a repeat sale with an existing client than with a stranger.

2. Activate more levers than "let's get more leads"

Across marketing, sales, and upsells, you can:

- Increase the quality of opportunities (e.g. go upmarket)
- Increase your show up rate, and closing rate
- Increase your sales velocity (how fast you close)
- Increase the initial average contract value ($iACV)
- Increase the contract duration (e.g. 1 month to 6 months)
- Increase the number of upsells and cross sells
- Increase the number of clients that become ambassadors

Easier said than done, but at least it's diversified.

So the business is not stuck on "getting more leads".

3. Focus on upsells so you can reinvest in marketing

Upsells are a great lever to grow revenue.

The reasons are obvious once you think about it:

- Reason 1: No marketing spend needed as the prospect is already your client.

- Reason 2: Upsells accelerate your CAC payback (you recover acquisition costs faster)

- Reason 3: Because there's no acquisition cost on existing customers, you free up budget to reinvest in marketing.

**

That said, the volume of opportunities is also important:

- You need volume to test and iterate to reinforce the system
- At some point, you need volume to hit the target

But the point stands: it's not the only lever available.

CEO: "We need to align marketing and sales."

Me: "The 1st step is to delete this misconception:"

Marketing stops when the sales process starts.

Here's how that mistake usually goes:

- Marketing is here for awareness and leadgen;
- When those 2 boxes are ticked, it's finished;
- "Ok we sent you a lead, we've done our job!"
- Then it's time for the sales team to shine!

This "funnel" looks like the perfect handoff in theory.

But from the buyer perspective it's the same brand and the same journey.

They don't instantly forget the ads, social content, and videos when they start speaking with your sales team.

Marketing still largely impacts the buying decision during the sales process for 2 reasons:

1. The marketing messages anchored them

They come into the sales process with beliefs and feelings they got from your marketing actions. The messages and insights you shared before have an impact on the sales conversations (objections, objectives, questions).

2. They still see your marketing actions during the sales phase

While talking to your sales team, your prospects keep seeing your posts, videos, emails, or case studies on your website. These actions have a new impact on their decision (it can reinforce a positive feeling or the contrary).

That's why you need to do this:

- Make sure you share the exact same messages across marketing and sales for a coherent journey.

- Don't alternate intense marketing seasons with low marketing seasons. Instead, run evergreen marketing with consistency.

And remember:

For buyers, it's the same brand and the same journey.

There is a weird thing about marketing.

From outside it looks simple, but when you zoom in:

- You need to understand human psychology
- You need to nail foundations like the messaging
- You need patience but also urgency to bring results
- You need to think like an engineer with experimentation

Or, well, all of this could be skipped, but...

... the marketing would not work.

And that's the main point here.

It's extremely easy and fast to do marketing that doesn't bring results.

- Just write a bunch of words that sound cool
- Spend some money on ads to "get leads"

But when you're really involved and try to get results.

It takes knowledge, time, practice, efforts, trials, and patience.

The best way to procrastinate on marketing is this:

- Create a website with 15 pages and 5 offers
- Multiply taglines to fit the 4 different ICPs
- Spend 90% of the time updating the "funnel"

This is a lot of work and it leaves only 10% left to create audience traffic.

So the problem is twofold here:

1. The funnel gets too complex so visitors have decision paralysis: they don't know what to do next.

2. The marketer in charge doesn't have enough time to create content, run ads, send DMs and emails.

But I have good news.

The solution to this problem is simple:

Reverse completely the time allocation.

1. Create a simple website with 1 offer for 1 ICP so it is clear and easy to maintain. Once properly set up, this represents 10% of your time.

2. Spend 90% of the time on generating awareness, authority, and traffic (mainly from content).

This way, your audience sees your content (or ads and emails), visits your simple website, and clicks on the unique CTA. Then, during the sales process, you can sell a clear offer.

That's how you build a solid marketing function.

I've used 3 B2B growth models:

1. The lead generation waterfall model

Publish SEO articles → Host whitepapers → Get leads → Send sequences

2. The growth marketing model

Experiment cold emails → Get leads → Experiment other channels

3. The social-first model

Publish content → Identify intent → Social selling

They were all interesting and efficient.

But in 2026, I now advise to run a "social-first" growth model:

- Publish content across personal brands
- Transform your brand into a media
- Analyze intent to prioritize outbound
- Use AI for all the technical systems

It's clearly a great model now.

- The customer acquisition cost (CAC) is low
- Intent-based outbound increases response rate
- Content contributes to both brand awareness and pipeline

Now of course you can still use some elements of the past models:

- A whitepaper and a webinar can be great
- Growth marketing sprints unlock new channels
- Outbound sequences work well (if signal-based)

And above all, you still need to nail ICP, positioning, messaging.

The model is evolving, but the foundations remain.

Founder: "We're not getting enough inbound leads"

Me: "What's your biggest marketing constraint now?"

Founder: "We're not sure, it's probably our design skills"

The truth is that:

The surface-level constraint is often not the primary cause of low inbound leads.

So you'll need to audit your marketing function entirely.

Here's a 4-step process to do this:

1. Get clarity on the root problem

- Identify the negative symptoms
- Link the symptoms to the root problem
- Audit the problem with an expert (internal or external)

2. Set up a plan, based on the problem's nature

- Turn the audit into recommendations
- Prioritize and plan the implementation
- Set a timeline with key objectives

3. Implement the recommendations

- Execute the top priority actions first
- Fix the problem at its core 
- Install a simple system that won't break

4. Assess and iterate based on the impact

- Monitor carefully the evolution of symptoms
- Analyze if the actions fixed the problem
- Implement new actions based on results

I've been doing marketing for 10 years.

These 9 concepts made me a better marketer:

9 Marketing Concepts to know in 2026

I answer the 7 questions I get most about positioning:

(Full positioning masterclass for 2026)

1. How important is positioning?

- When starting, choosing your desired positioning is crucial as it will impact the rest of your marketing and content strategy.

- Forging a positive perceived positioning (how the market perceives you) is a crucial goal of marketing.

So positioning is really a 10/10 in terms of importance.

2. Is positioning different from messaging?

Positioning and messaging are 2 sides of the same coin: if you don't deploy your messages across channels consistently, your positioning stays in your strategy deck.

3. What are the steps of a positioning process?

As shown in the infographic attached:

- Decide how you want to be perceived
- Explain how you will achieve this objective
- Write your messaging strategy
- Deploy messages across brand touchpoints
- Repeat with coherence and consistency
- Your audience shapes their own perception of your brand

4. Who is in charge of positioning?

- It's primarily a shared function between founders (business strategy) and marketing (marketing strategy)

- It's secondarily a responsibility of client-facing teams to respect the positioning (example: sales should follow the core messages)

5. What are the most frequent mistakes in positioning?

- Not having a positioning strategy at all
- Targeting too many ICPs, so the positioning is vague
- Not using the same messages across channels
- Not sticking to a positioning long enough

6. How can you tell if a positioning/messaging strategy is good?

It:

- Instantly targets a clear ICP and use case
- Shares the same messages across channels
- Communicates clearly "what's in it for the client?"
- Makes the business stand out (clear unique selling point)

7. Why is positioning so hard?

Because you cannot control the end goal (the perception of your audience).

You can only influence it with consistency and discipline in your messages.

That's why you need to choose a positioning and stick to it for a long period of time.

Subject: Marketers need to think more like CFOs in 2026.

Limiting the marketing scope to "leads" creates 3 problems:

1. It creates a misalignment between the marketing function, the sales team, and the business goals.

2. It turns the marketing team into a "lead factory" only committing to volume without clear pipeline impact.

3. Step by step, it isolates the marketing team into a satellite support function ("the art & craft department" / "can you make us a banner?")

This is especially true in industries where the sales-led model is the norm.

Now circling back to my subject:

Marketers need to think more like CFOs.

- It doesn't mean they should stare at financial dashboards all day
- It means they should think, and talk using financial metrics

Because when you start talking about unit economics, this happens:

- C-levels, CEOs, founders start listening to you;
- It shapes their perception of marketing;
- "Marketing can actually help."

Finally, marketing becomes a valuable function that can contribute to top-line revenue. Finally, marketers use keywords and metrics that C-levels care about. Finally, it's not only about impressions, awareness, and MQLs.

Now the question is: how can marketing do this?

1. First, marketers should know what metrics they can impact (it should be as far as possible in the funnel but a good one is "qualified revenue pipeline")

2. Second, marketers need to know (and understand) specific unit economics of the business to do their job correctly (CAC, CAC payback, LTV, ACV).

3. Third, marketers need to be able to explain the role of secondary metrics to non-marketers for context (impressions, clicks, leads).

I created an infographic to explain the point (2).

That's how you build a revenue-first marketing function.

🎉 My newsletter crossed 33,000 subscribers!

Here are my top 3 tips to grow yours:

1. Build your newsletter like a product with a clear audience, positioning, messaging, and value proposition

Your newsletter might be free but your reader will "pay with their time". That's why you need to fix your audience problem, share pertinent insights and deliver useful information consistently.

- Audience: Who should read your newsletter?
- Positioning: How do you want to be perceived?
- Messaging: What are you going to talk about?
- Value proposition: What positive impact will you bring?

2. Increase read time, clicks, and subscriber retention with visual assets (formatting, infographics, illustrations...)

Your newsletter is competing with short social posts and dynamic videos. So you need a tactic to retain attention and deliver your messages. Turning my newsletter into a "visual asset" was my best growth factor.

- Infographics, illustrations, photos of you
- H1, H2, H3 structure to facilitate navigation
- Skimmable text with bullet points, short paragraphs

3. Plug your newsletter into your content repurposing system where 1 idea becomes 15 pieces of content

Writing a 10,000-character newsletter every week can be long and repetitive. But when it's a central piece of your repurposing workflow, it gets easier and feels worth doing.

- Combine your best social posts into a newsletter
- Cut your newsletters into 5 social posts
- Reuse the infographics you've created

I hope these tips will be useful for your newsletter!

Feel free to ask me if you have any questions.

🎉 My new content bootcamp starts in April!

You'll learn my 4-step system behind 60M impressions:

1. Create your strategy for 2026 with your messaging narrative.

2. Ideate content with your unique insights and unique POV.

3. Learn to write the best hooks and copy.

4. Design your signature infographics and carousels.

And I'll teach you this system during my 5-week bootcamp.

Here's what you'll access:

- 6 Masterclasses with me to install your system
- Tailored 6-month content roadmap reviewed by me
- Help from premium writers to improve your content
- Access to my design team to review your infographics

You end the bootcamp with a system in place, a rebranded profile, branded templates, and 20 validated posts.

And above all: extreme clarity on what to post in the next 6 months.

Let's kick off 2026 with the best content strategy.

Do you want to get more information about my 5-week content creation bootcamp?

The author can see how you vote. Learn more

taplio

The Battle

Sangram Vajre

Pierre Herubel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreSangram Vajre's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScorePierre Herubel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Sangram Vajre

Pierre Herubel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Sangram Vajre's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScorePierre Herubel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreSangram Vajre's LinkedIn Performance