COO @ Blip | Amazon Alum | Business Ops architect for Series A startups

Blip is the first marketplace for digital billboards on-demand. Connecting advertisers with billboard owners has turned a rigid industry into something flexible and accessible. We replaced year-long contracts and minimums with on-demand access.

Through thousands of campaigns, we kept seeing the same pattern: traditional and digital channels don't compete. When you use them together properly, they multiply one other. Most marketing conversations still treat channels separately, missing how they are supposed to work as a system.

The data is clear: when properly integrated into a full-funnel approach, out-of-home advertising doesn't just add to digital performance—it multiplies it.

Our focus is helping growth-stage companies build full-funnel strategy and understand how awareness channels interact with conversion tactics. We work with the psychological principles behind it all. When you get the approach right, the results follow.

Happy to talk if you're working through channel strategy, attribution, or how out-of-home fits into modern marketing.

RJ Schultz

Ramp showed how digital OOH works.

Their co-founder, Eric Glyman, posted a screenshot of a billboard someone had mocked up in Slack. Someone else replied "Let's do this for real?"

8 hours later, it was live on Sunset Boulevard.

"Slack to skyline in 8 hours."

Traditional OOH is powerful for saturation and memory. But it wasn't built for this kind of speed. Digital OOH is.

A $32B company moved like a $32M one.

A company of that size executing with that speed is rare.

And this speed feeds the flywheel: OOH becomes content. Content becomes social proof. Social proof amplifies the original announcement.

Before social, billboards were confined to geography. Now a single placement can reach millions through screenshots. But only if the creative is sharp and deployment is fast enough to ride the wave.

Ramp turned a Slack line into a skyline asset in one workday.

COO @ Blip | Adkom: recognition & recall with smart OOH

A startup spent $1 million blanketing subway cars with ads for an AI companion you wear around your neck. Within days, riders were defacing them with markers and spray paint.

Then Heineken showed up with one billboard.

The company was Friend, an AI pendant that listens to your day and texts you back. Riders responded with graffiti: "AI is not your friend," "surveillance tool," "stop profiting off loneliness."

Heineken's response: a bottle opener shaped like the pendant. Seven words: "The best way to make a friend is over a beer."

Most brand "takes" fail because they're just cosplaying as commentators. Heineken didn't announce a viewpoint about AI ethics. They defended real-world socializing using the simplest possible proof.

But the real reason it worked: they punched the idea, not a person.

"AI friends are pathetic." "Tech bros are lonely." If Heineken had gone there, they'd be punching down. Instead, they aimed at a cultural misfire while defending a truth already theirs to claim.

The line did all the work. One object. One sentence. One brand truth. OOH rewards recall.

"AI friend" is abstract.

"Beer with someone" is concrete.

Heineken planted one thought at the exact moment people were ready to receive it.

You pass a billboard showing a darkened building with a single lit window glowing yellow in the shape of an arch.

Just two words below it: "We Deliver."

That billboard is everything most brands get wrong about this medium.

Large format OOH has no sound, geographic targeting only, 8 seconds at 65 mph, and weird angles; but the real constraint is cognitive bandwidth. If your brand can't compress itself into something people recognize quickly, you're paying for impressions that don't exist in human memory.

McDonald's solved this decades ago.

They turned the arches into a modular visual system where every execution is just a different way of drawing the same shape.

In 2018, Cossette's Toronto team cropped the golden arches into directional arrows with "On your right" and "Next exit" for McDonald's Canada. The Follow the Arches series won the Outdoor Grand Prix at Cannes.

To your brain, these aren't new ads. They repeat a pattern already burned in.

Most brands write visual systems that only work at one resolution, and they rebuild from scratch for each environment.

McDonald's arches work at any size: 40 feet on highways, reflections on shelters, implied fries on retail screens. The shapes repeat everywhere until recognition becomes automatic.

That's why they can delete the logo, remove the name, and still pull people off exits. They've already done the hard work upstream. 

Consistent packaging, architecture, advertising teaching the world a tiny visual language. And by the time they crop the logo or turn windows into arches, the pattern is already there.

A plumbing company in Georgia ran billboards alongside Google Ads. Branded search spiked. CPC fell. Conversions improved.

Then they paused the billboards.

Within weeks, every metric declined.

Most dashboards are built around the click. But the click isn't the beginning of the customer's thought process - it's the LAST step.

Aaron Services discovered what made their clicks cheap: People already knew who they were.

That's preloaded recognition: when users have already encountered your brand before they search.

So when they see your Google Search ad later, they recognize you, and this changes user behavior in predictable ways.

If Google believes users are more likely to click and convert on your ad, it charges you less per click.

Here's how they did it:

1. They reduced the tax for being unknown

Aaron Services built recognition that made people more likely to choose them before the search ever happened. That recognition rewrote the economics of EVERY auction they entered.

2. They turned generic searches into branded ones

The cheapest click in any category is often branded search - higher CTR, higher intent, less competition.

While billboards ran, Aaron Services watched branded searches climb. "Plumber near me" became "Aaron Services plumber."

When boards paused, branded volume dropped with it.

3. They measured billboards as a catalyst, not a closer

The team wasn't expecting immediate phone calls - they were aiming for name recall (funny enough, they got more of both).

The question becomes not "Did this board drive sales?" but "Did this board reduce what we pay to get conversions elsewhere?"

That's a *very* CFO-friendly question.

Billboards existed to make the closer work better.

The click gets credit, but preloaded recognition is what made the click cheap, and more likely to convert.

Anthropic put a bright orange billboard directly across the street from Meta's Seattle office. Simple copy. No gimmicks. Just a giant rectangle every Meta engineer sees on their commute. That's surgical.

Picture it.

You're an ML engineer at Meta. You drive in every morning, thinking about the models you're shipping.

Then you see it.

Bright orange. Impossible to miss. Claude. Right there, across from your office.

Just: here's our product, here's what it does, we're hiring people like you.

The digital-obsessed startup playbook says reach developers with thought-leadership blogs, Discord communities, promoted tweets.

Anthropic just bought a giant rectangle on your commute.

Why does this work when "developers hate advertising"?

Developers don't hate ads. They hate being sold to in the wrong place with language that wasn't written for them.

The Claude board passes both tests:

- Right place: outside the building where you ship ML models all day
- Right language: simple, product-oriented, engineer-first

The data backs it up. OOH produces the highest ad recall of all major channels. People need roughly 7 exposures before they act. You can't install an ad blocker on your drive to work.

That board is doing the two jobs that matter: product credibility and hiring visibility. Anthropic opened a Seattle office and is hiring aggressively from that exact talent pool. The billboard touches them twice a day.

The oldest playbook still works.

Apple doesn't write 'ads,' it writes muscle memory. Stand on any street corner and look up at an Apple billboard. You absorb it.

One image, a few words, a logo.
___

I used to stare at dashboards full of impressions thinking I was winning.

Cars passing signs. Eyeballs. CPM.

Those numbers looked great, but the pipeline didn't move.

Then I started asking a different question: when someone sees you, do they actually know it's you? Do they remember why you matter?

That's recognition, and recognition compounds.

At Blip, we created a metric to track recognition. Instead of only counting any impression, we started also counting Qualified Impressions: the 7th time the same person sees your message within 90 days.

One small shift in how we measured.

Here is what we had to unlearn:

——

1. "More impressions = more results"

Your dashboard can look great while your pipeline quietly stalls. You're counting how often an ad was served. You're not counting whether anyone remembers you exist.

2. "Billboards should tell your whole story"

Drive any highway and you'll see boards crammed with name, tagline, services, phone, URL, social handles, credibility badges. At 60 mph, nobody processes any of it. You're not informing anyone. You're just decorating the sky.

3. "Creative needs to change constantly"

The mere-exposure effect shows people choose what's familiar. The forgetting curve shows they forget you fast without reinforcement. Seven impressions is where you stop being noise and start being an option. Change is fine, but be consistent.

4. "Reach matters more than frequency"

I'd rather hit 40,000 of the right people 8-10 times than 400,000 random people once. One builds qualified impressions. The other feeds your dashboard and starves your funnel.

5. "Simple = lazy"

Apple's 'Shot on iPhone' ran on 10,000 billboards across 25 countries. Same structure every time: huge image, tiny line, Apple logo. One idea, repeated until it becomes part of how you see the world.

___

Attention is cheap. Memory is scarce.

Apple doesn't chase impressions. It compounds recognition.

Same codes, same message, repeated until choosing them feels like instinct.

If you want to understand how stubborn habits are, watch people in a drive-thru.

Most don't read the menu. They reenact it.

The car pulls up, the window slides open, and a script they've run a hundred times just plays. Same combo, same drink, maybe a small tweak. The whole thing takes less than thirty seconds.

There's a gap that should matter to anyone in media:

46% of Americans say they'd consider eating plant-based to reduce emissions. 53% have tried plant-based meat. But actual receipts barely move.

That gap is usually framed as a psychology problem or a product problem.

It's also a media problem.

If all your messaging lives in documentaries and viral videos, you're putting all your weight on the moments when people are abstract and aspirational. The real bottleneck is five minutes later, when they're hungry and on autopilot.

That's why PETA's Taco Bell campaign caught my attention.

They're placing billboards directly across the street from drive-thrus in Indianapolis, Kalamazoo, Florida, Georgia, New York, and other markets.

The message?

"Would It Kill You to Get a Bean Burrito?"

By the time you see that board, you've already decided to eat fast food. PETA is only fighting for one micro-choice: chicken burrito vs. bean burrito.

Same play with Domino's. Joan Jett on a billboard near Ann Arbor (Domino's HQ). Giant cow billboards outside Louisville locations. They even bought Domino's stock so they can attend shareholder meetings and file resolutions for vegan cheese.

The billboard is the sharp end of that funnel.

The alternative is already on the menu - just swap beans for meat. The board is physically tied to the decision - you see both in the same glance. And the ask is small - "get the bean burrito" beats "overhaul your diet."

The data backs this up. 43% of people who see a directional OOH ad visit that business within 30 minutes. Recall jumps to 71% when ads are placed right outside stores.

—

This playbook works beyond vegan advocacy.

Beverage brands pushing low-sugar options outside convenience stores. Transit authorities highlighting bus reliability at intersections.

The point is to treat inventory near point of purchase like an extension of the menu, not just a canvas for brand campaigns.

OOH is one of the few tools physically embedded in the moment when someone is hungry and slightly impatient.

That's where the real decisions happen.

McDonald's doesn't put paragraphs on billboards. They show you the fries. That's it. There's a reason McDonald's is McDonald's. Billboards aren't mini-websites. They're memory machines.

You know the franchise ads I mean.

A billboard trying to squeeze in the brand story, the offer, the app, the QR code, the phone number, and a paragraph the lawyer insisted on.

The designer fought hard for the gradient. 
The CMO fought hard for the tagline.
The driver going 60 mph saw NOTHING.

McDonald's looked at that playbook and did the opposite.

One image. One product. Maybe a price. The arches. Done.

If your billboard can't be understood in 3-5 seconds, it might as well be blank. That gives you room for about 6-8 words. One visual, not a collage.

The brain is a bouncer. Too many faces at the door and it lets none of them in.

McDonald's trick isn't creative brilliance.

It's seeing what everyone else misses: you don't win the highway moment by "explaining." You win it by being the one thing they can't NOT think of when they're hungry at 6:12 p.m.

Byron Sharp, author of How Brands Grow, calls that "mental availability." Being the brand that springs to mind first when a buyer hits a category moment.

Marketers have talked about the Rule of 7 for decades. People need around seven exposures before they act. At Blip, we measure this directly. 

When the same person hits their seventh impression, behavior changes.

Each time someone drives by a simple, consistent ad, the brain does less work:

"I've seen that color before."

"I remember that line."

"I know that logo."

Familiarity increases liking and recall, when the stimulus is simple and consistent.

Change the line every flight, redraw the visual every quarter, hide the logo until the end, and you make it harder for the brain to connect this exposure to the last six, and you're paying for seven impressions and getting one, really.

Those golden arches print money not because their billboards explain more.

But because a hungry driver at 6:12 p.m. doesn't need to think.

British Airways won the Outdoor Grand Prix at Cannes with a billboard that said "Because this weather sucks." Not "seamless connected experiences." Not "reinventing travel."

Blip is a company that lets you buy digital billboards on-demand the way you'd buy Uber rides.

And after billions of flips we have seen more creative than most people ever will.

After a while, you notice a pattern:

Most ads are written for a creative review, not a rainy Tuesday commute.

They sound great in a conference room. Nobody remembers them a week later.

That's a problem.

The visible metric everyone chases is impressions. Did people drive past this screen? Did a million pairs of eyes technically have line of sight?

But the invisible metric that actually moves your business is recognition:

Do I remember who you are when I'm finally ready to buy?

There's an old idea called the Rule of 7: people need to encounter a message around seven times before it sinks in.

Modern research keeps proving it. Purchase intent jumps once you hit that 5-7 exposure range, not at the first impression.

We built our business around this. We call it a Qualified Impression: the seventh impression delivered to the same person within about a quarter.

That's when awareness stops being a vague feeling and starts becoming a real buying option.

Once you see the world that way, you judge creative differently.

If someone is going to see this headline seven times, does it get truer each time, or more annoying?

"Because this weather sucks" gets truer. By the fourth wet Monday you start nodding .

"Reinventing the future of seamless connected experiences" ( 🙄 ) doesn't improve with age.

British Airways ran 500 lines like this. Each one tailored to a specific location. "Warm gusts of wind that don't come from tube trains" only works when you're standing next to a tube train. The physical context carries half the weight.

That’s copy built for repetition.

TAKEAWAY:

Most media is sold on impressions.

But impressions measure who could have seen your ad, not who remembered it.

That's why we built Blip around Qualified Impressions.

Not "how many cars drove past this screen."

But "how many people saw this message enough times for it to actually stick."

Once you buy media that way, you start demanding creative that deserves to be remembered.

Not clever lines that win internal approval.

Human lines that get truer the more someone sees them.

British Airways understood this.

500 billboards. One Cannes Grand Prix. Zero mentions of "seamless connected experiences."

If your ad can't survive the seventh impression, you're not buying awareness.

Most companies ignore billboards entirely because you can't attach a UTM to them. Notion didn't; they invested in awareness and now they own the mental real estate you're renting by the click.

Online, most of these companies are sharp. Attribution models. Multi-touch funnels. CAC/LTV dashboards.

But mention brand and they freeze up. For them, Marketing is all about looking backwards for attribution.

Notion chose OOH for top-of-funnel, and here's why it's smart:

1. OOH drives online action better than TV, radio, or print

Nielsen found out-of-home ads drove roughly 4x their expected share of online activations per dollar spent. Billboards make people Google you.

2. Frequency beats reach

Effective frequency research puts the sweet spot at 5-7 exposures. Your target customer passes the same boards 40 times a month. You don’t need to reach everyone once. You need to reach the right people seven times.

3. The creative is a system

Notion's partners describe building "a rich system of communication tools" that flexes to different stories without losing the core look. One template. Infinite variations. McKinsey found strong B2B brands significantly outperform weak ones on growth and profitability. 

_______

Notion is buying the one thing your retargeting pixels can't touch:

The mental real estate that decides which tab opens first when someone finally needs a new tool.

Rare Beauty put up three billboards last August. Scratch-and-sniff. Scan the QR code, request a sample through Shop, but only if you could prove you were standing there. No screenshots, no forwarding links. Show up or miss it.

You cannot explain smell through pixels. Digital can describe bergamot and vanilla, but it can't deliver the product. So most brands default to pretty visuals and hope customers find their way to a tester later.

That's expensive hoping.

Rare Beauty went extreme to solve it. You don't have to go this far. But while competitors chased impressions, they turned three street-level placements into demo units. Gave up cheap scale to gain something most brands never measure: confirmed readiness. 

An impression delivered to someone provably close enough (and motivated enough) to try.

Four places where Rare Beauty chose harder over easier:

1. They Made the Billboard the Product

Instead of showing the bottle, they made you smell it. Scratch-and-sniff at street level. Ashley Murphy (VP of consumer marketing) was explicit: fragrance notes are impossible to communicate digitally. Sampling is the only lever that matters. They chose operational complexity over safe execution.

2. They Geo-Gated the Flow (Even Though It Killed Scale)

Scan the QR, open Shop app, request your rollerball - but only if the app confirms you're standing there. One scan, one action. Most brands would open this to anyone with a link. Rare Beauty locked it down. They traded reach for intent.

3. They Mobilized Community Instead of Buying Strangers

They partnered with TYB to create a challenge for existing fans: hunt down the boards, redeem your sample. It was about converting people who already cared enough to go on a mission. They chose smaller audiences with higher intent.

4. They Measured Trials, Not Impressions

Their KPI was samples sent. Hard count of people who completed the action. They gave up the comfort of big awareness numbers to commit to a metric that could expose whether the campaign worked.

Scratch-and-sniff is overkill for most categories. The logic underneath isn't.

Digital boards with a short landing page URL to sample direct response. Proximity-based offers. 
Retargeting people who engaged. 
Measuring conversions and foot traffic lift, not impressions.

A campaign designed to prove something instead of just perform.

Not every brand needs this. But it's interesting how few even consider it.

Performance teams will say "cold traffic doesn't convert." They're wrong. What doesn't convert is asking strangers to buy before they know who you are.

Cold traffic works fine. You just can't start the conversation with a sales pitch.

It's like asking for money on a first date.

The reality is that most buyers aren't in-market right now. LinkedIn's B2B Institute calls it the 95-5 rule: roughly 95% of potential buyers aren't ready to buy today. They're out-market now, in-market later.

Google's research on the "messy middle" shows buyers don't move linearly from trigger to purchase. They loop through exploration and evaluation until they feel ready.

We at Blip have been forced to think about this more literally than most digital teams have. You either become familiar, or you don't.

So we built a model that stops you from treating strangers like customers:

0-1 impressions = AWARENESS

2-5 impressions = TRUST

6-7+ impressions = CONVERSION

Nielsen found 5-9 exposures drove brand resonance increases of up to 51%. Familiarity is manufactured through repeated contact. Conversion asks land differently once that familiarity exists.

Skip these steps and you pay an impatience tax:

1. You pay it in efficiency. Costs rise because you're trying to extract demand from people not in buying mode.

2. You pay it in backfire. MIT research found personalized retargeting ads actually hurt conversion when consumers haven't narrowed their preferences.

3. You pay it culturally. Your team concludes cold traffic doesn't convert. Then you retreat into retargeting pools that saturate and can't scale.

Build awareness. Then educate. Then convert.

You don't win cold conversion by perfecting your close. You win it by earning the right to close.

Stop asking for money on the first date.

For years, DOOH was the 'dumbest' channel in the media plan. Great creative canvas. Real physical reach. But when finance asked "what did they actually buy?" the honest answer was always "we don't really know."

That has all changed.

Walmart's ad business hit $4.4 billion in 2024. Growing 27% year over year. That's not experimental money. That's "this is a core business" money. And it means the pipes finally exist to prove what screens actually do.

'Walmart ads' means screens inside the store, and smart brands use them alongside traditional OOH in the following way:

1. Start from the store, not the board

- Which stores matter for your category volume?
- Which SKUs or basket behaviors are you trying to move?

Then overlay OOH supply around those stores. Your OOH footprint becomes the physical wrapper around retail demand.

2. Define your audience for the retail media

- Build "category buyers last 6 months"
- Or "lapsed buyers who haven't purchased in 90 days"
- Or "shoppers who purchased SKU X within category Y"

You don't guess which demographics might drive sales. You ask the retailer to show you the people who actually do.

3. Use OOH for authoritative frequency

Most digital channels optimize for low-frequency clicks. OOH builds repeated exposure in a geography.

At Blip, we found performance inflects around the seventh exposure to the same person. That's a qualified impression.

Not the first impression to seven random people. The seventh impression to one person.

4. Close the loop

Modern OOH buys connect to device graphs. You observe devices passing near screens, build an exposed audience cohort, and sync it back to your funnel as a retargeting pool.

Now the retailer knows who saw your boards. You retarget them onsite, offsite, in-store. OOH creates recognition. Retail media captures intent and transaction.

5. Measure sales lift with better data

- Incremental sales per exposed household
- Basket size lift
- New buyer penetration
- ROAS and contribution margin

------

Check out the hundreds of new retail media locations available on the Blip platform. 

2026 is your year.

When someone calls your OOH campaign "top of funnel," they're being polite. What they mean: we'll never know if it worked.

Tinder rejected that premise entirely. They ran billboards like performance media and counted downloads, not vibes.

OOH is a physical channel with digital expectations. That mismatch makes it vulnerable to the most common lie in marketing: substituting exposure for outcome.

Reach and impressions can be directionally true and operationally useless.

Tinder refused that deal. OUTFRONT partnered with StreetMetrics for real attribution: exposed vs. control. Result: 79% more likely to download. 1,045 attributable installs. This wasn't OOH as "awareness wallpaper." This was OOH as an install machine.

And the effect stacked over time. By flight end, the exposed group had 3x more downloads than control.

Most people don't install an app from one ad. They install because they saw it enough that the idea stopped feeling new.

We call this "recognition vs. attention" - repeated exposures to the same person until you're plausibly influencing action.

-------

You don't copy Tinder's creative. You copy their measurement posture:

1. Run an Experiment, Not a Sponsorship

Exposed group. Control group. If you can't describe your test in two sentences, you're narrating, not measuring.

2. Pick One Outcome You'll Defend

Downloads. Trial starts. Store visits. One primary metric.

3. Use Independent Measurement

Third-party attribution, a unique url, etc., not a case study written by the seller.

4. Plan for Frequency, Not a Cameo

This is where recognition vs. attention plays out. Repeated exposures to the right people beat one impression to many.

5. Define "Worked" Before You Launch

Cost per incremental install, lift vs. control, etc. Hold yourself to it.

Reach is easy to report, but outcomes require rigor. 

Run it like a channel, and measure it like a test.

59% ad recall. 31% top of mind. +18% purchase intent. Four weeks. Sony's LinkBuds Fit launch with Olivia Rodrigo didn't try to win the spec war; they won the memory war instead.

The numbers show exactly how:

Headphones are a category where “sameness” is the default. Everyone has ANC. Everyone has spatial audio. Specs don't differentiate fast enough to matter.

If you sell into a blurry category, ad recall is the prerequisite for everything else you want. If people can't remember who ran the ad, they can't buy the product later.

Sony's mechanism: Borrow attention from a celebrity partnership. Force repetition in the physical world. They ran a four-week NYC transit campaign - branded trains, station vinyl, bus placements - then measured it with control vs. exposed.

59% ad recall. That's 1.5x MFour's benchmark. Among ad recognizers: +11% favorability, +17% consideration, +18% purchase intent.

Don't confusing attention with recognition. Attention is cheap. Recognition converts later.

Lots of ways to create the spike.
Saturation creates the memory.

Positioning the Exceptional. Build your post-exit venture in public ✍🏼 Ghostwriter + Strategist.

If you want to :

- Sell your B2B services through Linkedin that CFOs beg to buy
- Close $1M in deals (minimum) without building a personal brand
- Cash in on sales through LinkedIn everytime you post  
- Outsmart every competitor in your market

DM me "window" for early access to my private program



Stéphanie Lauer

I hate sales calls, so I stopped doing them. And it’s how I’m going to make 7 figures. 

Instead, I mastered inbound, writing with enough sauce that buyers show up ready to buy, and I close deals in messages without having to persuade them.

I’ve noticed most of my sales come through emails anyway.

Mostly because I usually already know why someone is here before they even open their mouth.

Like, you come in and tell me you crossed $10M. I believe that.

What I’m actually listening for is:

The demand you’re currently generating through ads is slowly eating at you, micromanaging your team, you’re clearly fed up managing shitty buyers and spending way too much time dealing with people who question everything in your process.  

Because that’s the problem.

UR GETTING DEMAND BUT IT SUCKS.

And you don’t fix that on sales calls.

You don’t fix that by explaining more.

You fix it by writing to people who are already in crisis, loaded pockets who already know something’s off and are actively looking for someone who can handle it for them. 

Those people want your rules.

They want someone to say:

this is how it works

this is the plan

this is the price

And they relax when they hear that.

They bend because they’re relieved someone finally has structure.

This is why vague content kills sales.

You can shock people with your hooks and have DMs full of “this is so true.”

And still sell nothing.

Because none of that answers the only thing that matters at this level:

Can you actually deal with my problem?

Your writing has to do one thing.

It has to make it obvious that you know exactly what’s happening in their business - and that you know what to do about it.

When that’s clear, you assume the money is already in your account. That’s it.

That’s how inbound works.

A lot of people don’t have their best year yet because they keep doing shit they hate. 

People say “just do it consistently.”

But if you hate it - like really hate it - you’re already losing.

And that’s why you continue to attract buyers you hate -  and continue to choose them.

A lot of ceos tell me they hate them too, but its whats “required of them“ - thats to vet their buyers. My thought is this: You have sales people to take care of it. If you‘re still doing them U NEED TO UNDERSTAND your buyers better. And to climb to $30M you need to attract better buyers. 

I‘ll leave you with that.

I partner with founders (at $5M–$30M) so their buyers say yes to 1M+ deals. Subscribe below:

No alternative text description for this image

I’m going to tell you a slightly evil plan for getting a manufacturing group $1M+ clients/ per quarter on LinkedIn. An honest breakdown:

In the beginning, we pulled in the WRONG clients. Pre-seed inventors with no VC money. We were talking about products and it attracted people who had no funding behind their name.

So we stopped talking about products and started talking about the moment where everything can go wrong in hardware.
Pre-production. The moment of hell.

The moment where money has already been committed, timelines are fragile, one mistake can cost six figures, and nobody inside the company wants to be the person responsible if it fails.

Almost no business actually knows their buyer’s crisis moment.

They’ll say shit like:
“We help companies build products”
“We do end-to-end manufacturing”
“We scale businesses”

That’s really useless.

This is the question I use to vet every inbound in 2025:

“What is the exact moment your buyer panics internally?”

Why i’m punitively precise on that angle:

Every deal has multiple trust battles:

- Do they trust you
- Do they trust your mechanism / method
- Do they believe the mechanism works for their situation
- Do they trust you to execute it 
- Do they believe it delivers the result

We rode that angle relentlessly. Even if it got boring.

Now that manufacturer is closing $1.2M clients/ per quarter on Linkedin. 

This is where a real positioning strategist matters.
Someone who understands LinkedIn well enough to wear the angle out properly.

And moving into 2026 I’m adding a new layer to our strategy:

We’re launching our own products as a group and showing every real manufacturing decision in public, so when buyers hit the moment they’re scared to decide, the trust is already pre-sold.

That is doing two things:

1. Pulling in bigger buyers
2. It opens doors to media that has nothing to do with LinkedIn.

You could absolutely run this yourself if you’re a manufacturer.

Or you partner with someone who’s already burned the cycles figuring it out.

That’s what we do here.

I control demand for a few manufactuers and across all of them, I’ve noticed the same thing: TAKE NOTES. 

The moment they own a mechanism - and we push that mechanism everywhere - buyers handle their own objections at every stage of the sale.

We’ve done this through lead magnets and through long-form breakdowns.

But the real shift happened when we pushed the mechanism hard on LinkedIn and made all of their marketing about how the work actually gets done.

There’s this idea floating around that “buyers don’t care about your method.”

That’s bullshit - at least for this class of buyer.

There is a massive difference between:

- someone buying a $3K SaaS tool
- and a buyer about to risk six or seven figures on a manufacturing decision

Those buyers want to see how the machine works.

Here’s what’s actually happening under the hood with every serious prospect:

You have multiple battles to win - in order.

1. Do they trust you?
2. Do they trust your mechanism?
3. Do they believe the mechanism works for their situation?
4. Do they trust you to execute it under pressure?
5. Do they believe it reliably delivers the result?

We let assets do the heavy lifting before the conversation even starts.

This is how.

We take their real process and put it under a microscope.

1. We break the process into distinct stages
2. We give each stage a specific name
3. We wrap it in technology or systems that are built in-house 
4. We explain exactly how each stage works
5. We show how each stage connects to the next
6. We lead everything to a clear end result

Now something important happens.

Instead of being skeptical of the entire process, prospects can be skeptical about one stage at a time.

That’s good.

Because each stage now has its own focused asset that goes deep on that specific risk, that specific decision, that specific concern.

So objections stop being emotional and vague:

“I’m not sure this will work…”

And become precise and solvable:

“What happens at Stage 3 when copycat manufacturers in China replicate your design at half the price - and how do you prevent it?"

That’s when deals move.

Prospects want to see the machinery exposed.

Prospects want to see you naked - operationally.

And 2026 is going to reward exactly that.

Hyper-specific mechanisms.

Because it removes uncertainty before they ever have to ask for reassurance.

CLOCKED IT????

That’s how manufacturers sell faster, with less convincing, and bigger mandates.

taplio

The Battle

RJ Schultz

Stéphanie Lauer

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreRJ Schultz's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreStéphanie Lauer's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

RJ Schultz

Stéphanie Lauer

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}RJ Schultz's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreStéphanie Lauer's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreRJ Schultz's LinkedIn Performance