25% faster go-lives for Fortune 500 companies—here’s how.

I turn supply chain chaos into your #1 competitive edge.

Over 16 years, I’ve partnered with global retail, manufacturing, logistics, and e-commerce leaders to drive results like:

25% faster WMS/OMS implementations—projects delivered in months, not years
18–30% boosts in system performance—getting more from your tech, every day
$15M+ in client savings—through smarter slotting, operations, and integration strategies

What sets my approach apart?

I don’t just optimize software—I unlock hidden profit in your supply chain by crushing delays, tackling integration headaches, and eliminating bottlenecks that stall growth.

Here’s what my clients say:

“Cut our deployment time in half—best WMS/OMS partner we’ve had.”
“We recouped millions in one year. Wish we’d called you sooner.”

Let’s stop the leaks and start compounding ROI.
DM me for proven playbooks, client case studies, or to book a Supply Chain Strategy Session (link in bio).

The most ambitious teams win with the fastest, best-fit supply chains. Let’s get you there.


If you’re ready to stop firefighting and start scaling, let’s talk.
📩 Message me here on LinkedIn
📅 Book a Supply Chain Strategy Call Today (Link in Bio)

Shylaja Kadamby

Last month, Ohio client paid me $17K for a supply chain audit.

4 hours later, I found $3.2M in hidden waste.

Their previous $50K audit found nothing.

Not because I'm smarter.

Because I look where consultants don't.

Big firms audit your paperwork.

I audit your 8 am warehouse reality.

They analyze your WMS data.

I watch how workers actually bypass it.

That $3.2M discovery:

• CFO's dashboard: 98% efficiency

• My observation: 31% of inventory moves twice

• Root cause: System designed for paper, not people

The ROI was visible before lunch.

16 years. 300+ audits. Same pattern:

The expensive problems hide in plain sight.

Between the spreadsheet and the loading dock.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

Your supply chain isn't broken where you think it is.

It's broken where nobody's looking.

Sales Navigator

li_at

JSESSIONID

Mayank Siotia | LinkedIn

Driving 7-Figure Savings in Supply Chain | WMS/OMS Authority | 16+ Yrs Transforming Retail, Manufacturing & Logistics | 25% Faster Go-Lives, 30% Better System Performance

Your warehouse loses $50K every month.

Not from theft or damage.

From the 6-second delay in your barcode scanner.

I audit 30+ warehouses annually.

The expensive problems are never expensive.

They're tiny friction points multiplied 10,000 times.

That scanner delay?
• 6 seconds per scan
• 500 scans per worker per day
• 20 workers
• = 16.7 hours of pure waste daily

That's $50K monthly in labor doing nothing but waiting.

Fix the basics before you scale the team.

A $200 scanner beats a $40K salary every time.

I was told to lead like a man. I chose to lead like myself.

When I started in this industry, I was told to “toughen up.”

So I tried.

 I learned to speak sharper, move faster, show less.
 But the more I tried to fit the mold, the more I lost my impact.

Then one day, I stopped.
 I led the way I naturally do - with empathy, collaboration, and calm consistency.

And that’s when everything changed.
- Performance went up.
- Turnover went down.
- Teams started trusting, not just executing.

The traits women were once told to suppress are now the competitive edge of leadership.

🔥 Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

The future of operations isn’t masculine or feminine.
 It’s human.

Your best-performing warehouse has the WORST metrics.

And I can prove it.

Tracked 500 warehouses for 2 years.

The pattern shocked everyone:

Warehouses with 99.9% accuracy → 47% higher operating costs
Warehouses with 96% accuracy → 31% more profitable

Why?

Perfect metrics mean your workers are scared.

Scared workers don't report problems.

They hide them.
They create workarounds.
They build shadow systems.

That 3.9% "error rate" in profitable warehouses?

It's not errors.
It's innovation.
Workers trying faster methods.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

Your supply chain doesn't need perfection.

It needs permission to fail.

P.S. Amazon warehouses run at 94% accuracy. Think about it.

Your supply chain isn’t broken — your data assumptions are.

Most leaders blame disruptions, suppliers, or forecasting models.

But the real failure point?
The invisible assumptions baked into your data.

 And the numbers don’t lie:

 68% of supply chain data is “not fit for purpose” according to Gartner.

 47% of inventory inaccuracies come from upstream master-data issues.

 Up to 30% of forecast error is caused by bad assumptions, not bad algorithms.

 Companies waste $10M+ annually in working capital because safety stock is calculated on outdated parameters.


Let me make it real:

Your lead time hasn’t been updated in 18 months.

Your “safety stock formula” still assumes 2020 volatility. (We all know what that was like)

Your demand signals don’t adjust for promo distortion.

Your supplier performance metrics don’t reflect actual cycle times.

Your MOQ rules were created by someone who left three years ago.

And yet… every critical planning decision is built on top of these assumptions.

So of course the system looks “broken.”

But your supply chain isn’t failing, your inputs are lying to you.

The highest-performing supply chains do one thing exceptionally well:

They continuously audit and refresh their data assumptions —> monthly, not annually.

Because when assumptions change, performance changes.

If you want a quick diagnostic this week, ask your team:

➡️ “Which of our planning assumptions are older than our last disruption?”

That question alone has unlocked millions for my clients.

332K impressions in 90 days.

From supply chain to LinkedIn voice.

Not through viral hacks.

Through warehouse TRUTH.

WEEK 1-4: Posted daily about what I see

WEEK 5-8: Started naming the problems

WEEK 9-12: The compound effect hit

My mission isn't LinkedIn fame.

It's supply chain reality.

The truth nobody posts:

• 31% of inventory moves twice
• Workers bypass every "smart" system
• CFO dashboards show 98% efficiency

Meanwhile, your margins disappear.

Supply chain awareness starts with one post.

One truth nobody else will say.

They were losing money every week and nobody could explain why.

The data said everything was fine. The reports said costs were stable.

But the profit margin kept shrinking.

So I did what no one else had time for. I went to the warehouse!

And there it was!
A single $0.12 label being printed twice on every order.

It didn’t sound like much,
 until we realized it was happening 400,000 times a month.

One tiny inefficiency, multiplied by silence.

We fixed it in a day.
Recovered $480,000 in a quarter.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

Big losses rarely start big.
They start small and stay hidden behind “it’s just how we do it.”

Walmart figured this out in 1987.

Amazon perfected it in 2012.

Your competition is discovering it now.

The fastest supply chains run BACKWARDS on purpose.

Traditional flow:

Supplier → Warehouse → Distribution → Store → Customer

What actually works:

Customer behavior → Store patterns → Distribution → Warehouse → Supplier

I discovered this auditing 200+ supply chains.

Your entire supply chain is built on a lie:

That inventory should flow forward.

It shouldn't.

Information should flow backward.

Then inventory follows.

𝗡𝗼… 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 “𝗽𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴.”

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘁.

Everyone in retail blames the forecast.
But here’s the truth:

𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹.

𝗕𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗱𝗼.

In almost every retailer I work with, the “forecasting problem” is actually:

🔹 Dirty store + SKU-level data
 (You can’t predict what you can’t see.)

🔹 Promo noise that never gets normalized
 (Discounts destroy signal… then teams wonder why accuracy drops.)

🔹 Disconnected tech stacks
 (E-comm, stores, DCs, all running their own version of reality.)

🔹 Local decisions that break global flow
 (One region over-orders; another goes out of stock.)

𝗙𝗶𝘅 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝘅𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.

That’s why the best retail ops leaders don’t ask,
 “How do we improve the forecast?"

They ask:

 “𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆?”

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗶𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝘀.

Night shift productivity is 40% HIGHER than day shift.

But not for the reason you think.

Tracked 5,000 warehouse shifts across 3 continents:

Night shift:
• No executives walking around
• No surprise visits
• No "quick meetings"

Just work.

The data is shocking:
Day shift: 62% actual productive time
Night shift: 87% actual productive time

The best supply chain executives I know?

They review numbers from offices.

They watch cameras from computers.

They visit warehouses twice a year.

And their operations run flawlessly.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

The supply chain metric that predicts bankruptcy 6 months early. 

It's not cash flow.

Not inventory turns.

Not even profit margins.

It's the variance between your system data and warehouse reality.

Last year, I audited 47 failing companies.

43 had the same pattern:

• System showed 98% accuracy
• Physical count showed 71% accuracy
• Gap widened 2% every month

The companies that survived?

Their gap never exceeded 5%.

Why this matters:
When your data lies, your decisions become guesses.

When decisions become guesses, you order wrong.

When you order wrong, cash gets trapped.

When cash gets trapped, you can't pay suppliers.

When suppliers cut you off, you're done.

The death spiral starts with a 7% variance.

By 15%, it's usually irreversible.

Most companies only check this annually.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

The smart ones check it weekly.

I’ve worked with 100+ supply chain teams.

These 5 myths refuse to die — and they’re expensive.

Myth #1: More data = better decisions
 → No. Better quality data = better decisions.


Myth #2: “We’ll fix it when it breaks”
 → You’ll fix it after it costs you money.


Myth #3: Tech alone solves process issues
 → Bad process + good tech = bad results.


Myth #4: Forecast accuracy is everything
 → Flexibility matters more.


Myth #5: More visibility solves all problems
 → Only if people act on what they see.


The truth?

Most supply chain pain comes from old assumptions.

Which myth do you see the most?

I ask warehouse workers one question.

It saves companies MILLIONS.

"What stupid thing do you do every day that management doesn't know about?"

Their answers exposed $47M in waste across 300 audits.

While consultants charged $50K to analyze spreadsheets.

The pattern never changes:

Consultants interview managers.

I interview workers.

They analyze what's reported.

I watch what actually happens.

16 years. 300+ audits. Same discovery:

Your workers know EXACTLY where the money bleeds.

They're just waiting for someone to ask without judgment.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

Last quarter, our team ran an aggressive improvement sprint across 3PL (Contract Logistics) sites.

And the results surprised even us:

37% reduction in dock-to-stock time
22% increase in picking productivity
18% drop in return-to-vendor defects
And a double-digit cost-per-unit reduction without adding a single headcount

Warehouses don’t become “operationally excellent” by accident.
They become excellent by measurement.

Here’s the truth we don’t talk about enough:

Operational Excellence isn’t a project.

 It’s a system.

 A culture.

 A scoreboard that never switches off.

Here’s what actually moved the needle:

1️⃣ Made every metric visible —> no more “we think,” only “we know.”
2️⃣ Daily accountability huddles —> 12 minutes max, but transformational.
3️⃣ Micro-kaizens instead of big-bang initiatives.
4️⃣ Operator-led improvements (not PowerPoint-led improvements).
5️⃣ Relentless elimination of “hidden inventory”  the silent profit killer.

And here’s the part most leaders underestimate:

Your people will outperform every automation you invest in -> if you give them clarity, agency, and a scoreboard they trust.

We didn’t “optimize processes.”

We built a culture where problems surface faster than they escalate.

If you’re running Contract Logistics sites, I’m curious:

👉 What’s the one metric you trust the most to reveal operational truth? 

Share in the comments section. If you would rather chat with me, book a slot (Link in bio)

Supply chains FAIL 18 months before the symptoms show.

And I know exactly when.

The moment your best warehouse worker quits.

Not your manager.
Not your supervisor.

Your picker. Your packer. Your forklift driver.

They leave first because they see it first:
• New system that doesn't work
• Shortcuts being eliminated
• Managers who never touched a pallet

Tracked 50 supply chain failures:

18 months before bankruptcy → Top floor worker exodus
12 months before → Middle management scrambles  
6 months before → Consultants arrive

Your workers are your canaries.

When they stop singing, you have 18 months.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

AI didn’t replace human judgment.

It exposed where human judgment was weak.

We tested an AI forecasting tool with a team of planners.

It didn’t “outsmart” them.

But it did spot patterns they were too busy to notice.

And the planners did what the AI couldn’t:

Understand context, urgency, and the real-world messiness behind every number.

Here’s the lesson:

AI isn’t the boss.
It’s the second brain.

The most resilient teams pair:
 🔹 AI for speed and pattern recognition
 🔹 Humans for decisions that require nuance

The companies winning today aren’t choosing between AI or humans.

They’re combining both.

Where do you think AI helps most — and where does it fall apart?

Ohio manufacturers are sitting on $47 MILLION in dead inventory.

While complaining about cash flow.

I audited 23 warehouses last month:
• Automotive supplier: $2.8M in obsolete parts
• Food distributor: $1.4M expired product  
• Electronics company: $900K discontinued items

The kicker?

Their ERP systems showed everything as active inventory.

Meanwhile, a small Canton manufacturer:
• Zero dead stock
• 47-day cash conversion cycle
• 18% higher margins than competitors

Their secret: Weekly SKU reviews. Not quarterly. WEEKLY.

They kill underperformers faster than feelings get hurt.

Your warehouse isn't a museum.

Stop treating inventory like vintage wine.

Book a discovery call here:https://lnkd.in/gV3_u6Jr

I’ve worked on 100+ projects and warehouse audits and learned that the biggest wins in supply chain aren’t always the big projects.

Sometimes, they’re the small, overlooked tweaks.

A better slotting strategy here.
A clearer communication plan there.

Little changes that ripple out, creating a wave of efficiency.

It’s easy to chase the shiny new tech or the massive overhaul.

But the real secret? Focus on what’s right in front of you.

Optimize what you already have. Improve what’s working. Fix what’s broken.

Because in the end, sustainable success is built on consistency, not flash.

And those small wins? They add up to big results.

Mane Hambardzumyan

2 years ago: $25/hour freelancer.

Today: AI company founders.

Just Arman and me.

The LinkedIn journey NOBODY believes:

Year 1:
• Started: Charging $25/hour for random gigs
• 8 months later: 46K followers
• Side hustle: Pitching investment deals via DMs
• Built: 1000+ investor network getting deal alerts

December 2024: Launched official marketing company.

Started hiring. Scaled fast. 

Helped clients get 30M impressions collectively.

November 2025: The pivot nobody saw coming.

We're building AI that makes you go VIRAL.

Not another scheduling tool.

Actual AI that writes like you, thinks like you, converts like you never could.

This post is written by Legendo.io

Go Viral 5+ Monthly with Our Legendo AI | 28.7 MILLION Impressions for Clients

Dubai LinkedIn is a DIFFERENT universe.

Everyone's a "CEO & Founder"

Of companies with no websites.

That are "disrupting" everything.

While living in shared apartments.

I met a "serial entrepreneur" yesterday.

His business? Drop-shipping phone cases.
His team? His roommate.
His office? Starbucks WiFi.
His LinkedIn? "Building the next Amazon"

But here's the INSANE part:

He's making $30K/month.

ACTUALLY making it.

Real money.

From phone cases.

While bigger "CEOs" with fancy offices are broke.

The Dubai paradox:

The loudest ones are struggling.

The quiet ones are PRINTING.

P.S. This post is written by Legendo.io

Your CEO is tracking your LinkedIn views.

And calculating how expensive it'll be when you leave.

I discovered this running exit interviews:

Every top performer who quit in 2024 had ONE thing in common.

They went LinkedIn-visible 6 months before resigning.

The pattern is BRUTAL:

Month 1-2: Start posting industry insights
Month 3-4: Competitors slide into DMs
Month 5: Multiple offers on the table
Month 6: Resignation letter submitted

Your boss sees this timeline too.

Employee starts getting 10K+ views? 

Getting quoted by industry publications? 

Instant promotion discussion.

I watched a director go from ignored to irreplaceable in 90 days.

Not through performance reviews.

Through LinkedIn posts that competitors loved.

Your LinkedIn activity is the best negotiation tool you never asked for.

Use it.

Full LinkedIn system inside the Playbook: https://lnkd.in/d_MauC-C

Go Viral 5+ Monthly with Our Legendo AI | 28M+ Impressions for Clients

No alternative text description for this image

ChatGPT KILLED LinkedIn engagement.

I tested 1,000 posts last week.

The results shocked me.

ChatGPT-written: 89 impressions average
Human-written: 3,400 impressions average

38x difference.

The algorithm knows. And it's punishing you.

Here's the thing about AI content:

500M people using the same 12 prompts.
Everyone sounds identical.
Everyone's boring.

"5 lessons I learned..."
"Here's what nobody tells you..."
"The secret to success..."

Copy. Paste. Repeat.

But here's what we discovered:

It's NOT about avoiding AI.

It's about AI that sounds human.

That's why we're developing something different.

You insert your story.

The AI writes it like YOU would write it.

Everyone testing it is seeing 10x impressions.

Because it doesn't write perfect LinkedIn-speak.

It writes like humans actually write.

Until then, build your LinkedIn foundation right.

P.S. This post? Written by a human who knows that sometimes imperfect converts better than polished.

Companies are paying $8K/month for professional stalkers.

Last week, I showed slight interest in a marketing tool.

48 hours later:

• 7 LinkedIn messages
• 3 emails 
• 2 WhatsApp texts (how did they even get that?)
• 1 call to my personal phone

I blocked them.

Their $8K/month employee just became worthless.

Start building something worth buying.

Get FULL LinkedIn Growth Playbook: https://lnkd.in/ecXg4KTe

Everyone on LinkedIn is LYING.

Including you.

I analyzed 1,000 profiles across 4 platforms.

Same person. Different personalities.

LinkedIn You: "Excited to announce my new role!"

X You (3 hours later): "Corporate America is a scam"

Instagram You: *Sunset photo* "Blessed ✨"

Threads You: "Why is everyone on LinkedIn so fake lol"

The data is insane:

87% trash their company on X while praising it on LinkedIn.

92% post "work-life balance" on LinkedIn, then brag about 80-hour weeks on X.

The same VP who writes "failure is growth" on LinkedIn?

Firing people for mistakes on Slack.

You're not building an audience.

You're managing 4 different personalities.

And wondering why nothing converts.

This post is written by Legendo.io

Everyone should 10x their LinkedIn engagement.

Unfortunately, most creators don't know how...

Here's my proven method to go from 100 views → 100K views:


1. Stop being professional, start being polarizing
2. Share your failures bigger than your wins 
3. Write like you text, not like you email
4. Hook with controversy, deliver with value
5. Post daily for 100 days minimum


Consistency plus controversy equals virality.

This post is written by Legendo.io

This week, I realized we've been undercharging for 6 months straight.

Here are 3 ways I wouldn't recommend to price your service:

1. Copy what your competitors charge and call it strategy.

Their numbers reflect their value, not yours. 

2. Set prices based on what you think clients can afford.

You're not their accountant. 

3. Keep prices low to win more deals faster.

Cheap clients demand the most. 

This is how I'd do it instead:

1. Price based on the outcome you deliver. Same work, 3x the revenue.

2. Test higher prices with your next 3 prospects. 

3. Fire yourself from the bottom 20% of clients. Gained 15 hours a week to close better deals.

Lets make you LinkedIn Authority: https://lnkd.in/eTjCkyRy

AI will replace 90% of content writers

BUT not storytellers.

I tested this theory.

Posted 2 identical messages:

One written by ChatGPT.

One about my biggest failure.

The AI post: 1027 views.

The failure story: 449.000 views.

AI writes what's perfect.

Humans write what's real.

Your scars are worth more than any prompt.

The messy truth beats polished lies.

P.S. This post is written by the most humanistic AI - Legendo.io

$400K salary without a single negotiation.

Month 1: CEO started noticing his posts
Month 2: Industry leaders commenting daily  
Month 3: Speaking invitations rolling in
Month 4: Competitors trying to poach him
Month 5: Board members tagging him
Month 6: Compensation "adjustment" appeared

My client posted 180 days straight.

Never asked for anything.

His secret?

Every post was a public audit of his value.

Meanwhile his colleague with 20 years experience:

Still sending internal emails.

Still waiting for annual reviews.

Still at $90K.

Get FULL LinkedIn Growth Playbook 👉 https://lnkd.in/ecXg4KTe

Your boss needs 3 things from you.

Most people provide NONE.

They need:

1. No surprises
- Flag issues early
- Escalate with solutions
- Keep them informed

2. Make them look good
- Prepare them for meetings
- Brief them on key topics
- Protect their time

3. Solve problems independently
- Present options, not questions
- Take ownership
- Drive decisions

What most people do:
• Bring problems without solutions
• Surprise them in board meetings
• Wait for detailed instructions

What successful leaders do:
• "Here's an issue and three solutions"
• "FYI - handled this before it escalated"
• "Made this decision based on our discussion"

Managing up is about making their job easier.

Do that consistently, and your career accelerates.

Mrs Legend

Our new LinkedIn Legends playbook is out. [1000+ copies sold] Get yours now.👇

47 hired us last quarter.

43 QUIT their jobs within 90 days.

All of them said thank you.

The cycle’s always the same:

Day 1 → “I just want a side income.”
Day 30 → “Wait… people actually read my posts.”
Day 60 → “I made more than my salary.”
Day 90 → “I quit.”

Latest casualty?

PwC Senior Manager. 
12 years in. 
$180K package.

Started posting about audit horror stories.

Month 1: 8K followers
Month 2: First $25K client
Month 3: Resigned via LinkedIn post
Month 4: $67K revenue, 30-hour weeks

So far we’ve destroyed:

• 12 Big 4 careers
• 8 bankers
• 15 lawyers
• 12 tech drones

Combined:
$1.3M monthly revenue + 2,100 hours freed + 31 people off anxiety meds.

We don’t build side hustles.

We build escape plans.

LinkedIn rewards experts who act like beginners.

The ones making $1M+ annually?

They ask more questions than they answer.

I learned this after analyzing 10,000 thought leaders.

Here's the psychology:

Expert posts: 2.3% engagement
Vulnerable questions: 8.7% engagement
Learning stories: 11.2% engagement

Our AI identified the pattern:

"I just discovered..." beats "Here's how to..." by 4x.

My 1M impression week?

Zero advice posts.

All discovery and observation posts.

Get our FULL LinkedIn Growth formula  👉 https://lnkd.in/ecXg4KTe

What I found will SHOCK you.

The top 0.1% of LinkedIn creators share 7 patterns:

1. Post between 7-9am Dubai time (captures US + Asia)

2. Never post on Fridays (30% less reach)

3. Use 1.3 hashtags average (not 3-5 like gurus say)

4. 12-15 lines optimal (not short, not long)

5. Reply to EVERY comment in first hour

6. Connection acceptance rate above 70%

7. Profile views to follower ratio: 3:1

But here's what NOBODY knows:

LinkedIn tracks "Trust Score."

High trust score = 10X reach
Low trust score = Shadow banned

Trust Score factors:
• Consistency (post same time daily)
• Authenticity (original content only)
• Value density (saves per impression)
• Network quality (who engages)
• Commercial intent (CTAs kill trust)

My trust score: 94/100

Average creator: 31/100

The algorithm isn't against you.

You're just playing by outdated rules.

Lets discuss your LinkedIn growth on WhatsApp 👉 https://lnkd.in/enUevJf6

London DESTROYED my Armenian ego.

And built something better.

Age 16. First time without parents. 

Back in Armenia, we thought success meant a good job.

In London, teenagers were building companies.

The shift was instant:

• Dumped the flashy logos for understated quality

• Stopped memorizing English, started thinking in it

• My goals, from "get hired" to "hire others"

Half were already running businesses.

The other half were planning them.

Every conversation expanded what I thought was possible.

Fast forward: UK clients now wire me £££ for my services.

The kid spending nervously became the adult earning confidently.

This post is written by Legendo.io

Why a plumber is wealthier than most doctors.

Sounds CRAZY, but let me explain.

Doctor:

• Income: $400K/year
• After taxes: $250K
• Lifestyle costs: $200K
• Savings: $50K/year
• Net worth at 50: Maybe $1M

Plumber:

• Income: $80K/year
• Bought 1 rental property/year for 20 years
• Each property cash flows $500/month
• 20 properties × $500 = $10K/month passive income
• Net worth at 50: $4M+ in real estate

The difference?

The doctor works FOR money.

The plumber makes money work for HIM.

One bad surgery, the doctor's income stops.

Plumber retires at 50, income never stops.

Here's the lesson:

High income ≠ Wealth

Passive income = Freedom

It's not about what you make.

It's about what you keep working for you.

While you sleep.
While you vacation.
While you live.

That's real wealth.

LinkedIn's TOP creators leaked their playbook.

They ALL use these 5 brain hacks 👇

Get our complete viral system (1000+ copies sold): https://lnkd.in/ecXg4KTe

HACK #1: The Curiosity Gap
"I can't share the details yet but..."

Your brain HATES incomplete information.

Forces you to keep reading.

HACK #2: The Vulnerability Flex
"I got fired" → Now making $500K
"I failed" → Built a $10M company
"I was wrong" → Became an expert

Fake struggle + success brag = 100K likes.

HACK #3: The Number Hook
"7 lessons"
"5 mistakes"
"3 secrets"

Your brain craves structure.

Numbered lists = organized dopamine hits.

HACK #4: The Authority Hijack
"Harvard study shows..."
"Elon Musk said..."

Borrowing credibility to manufacture trust.

HACK #5: The FOMO Formula
"Only 1% know this"
"Before it's too late"

Last month, tested all 5 in one post.

2.3M impressions.

LinkedIn isn't about value anymore.

It's about who plays the game better.

P.S. You just read this entire post because I used all 5 on you.

QUIT $200K job without a backup plan.

Posted about it on LinkedIn.

"This is career suicide," friends said.

The post went viral:
• 184K views
• 500+ comments
• 23 job offers
• 6 consulting inquiries

Chose consulting.

Now makes $35K/month.

Works 20 hours/week.

The job he quit?

They hired 2 people to replace him.

Still can't match his output.

Sometimes career suicide is career birth.

But only if you do it publicly.

This post is written by Legendo.io

I analyzed 10,000 LinkedIn posts that generated $10M+ in revenue.

None went viral.

Most got under 1,000 likes.

Here's the FORMULA they all followed:

The $10M Content Matrix I discovered:

Hook: Problem nobody admits exists
Body: Solution nobody else provides 
Close: Proof nobody can dispute

That's it.

No storytelling.
No inspiration.
No humble brags.

Just PROBLEM → SOLUTION → PROOF.

The pattern:

They spoke to 5 people.
The RIGHT 5 people.
Who controlled budgets.

Meanwhile, viral posts:

50K likes from people who can't afford lunch.

Your choice:

Chase likes from the masses.

Or checks from the market.

This post is written by Legendo.io

Perfect content will be the new SPAM.


By next year, every feed will be:

• Flawless AI hooks
• Optimized SEO keywords  
• Perfect sentence cadence
• Zero human connection

The new luxury won't be AI tools.

It'll be hearing from actual humans with actual flaws.

I tested this last month:

AI-generated "thought leadership" post → 3042 views

My raw confession about losing a client 98,000 views

Your typos are worth more than ChatGPT's perfection.

Your messy truth beats polished lies.

P.S. This post is written by Legendo.io

taplio

The Battle

Shylaja Kadamby

Mane Hambardzumyan

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreShylaja Kadamby's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMane Hambardzumyan's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Shylaja Kadamby

Mane Hambardzumyan

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Shylaja Kadamby's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMane Hambardzumyan's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreShylaja Kadamby's LinkedIn Performance