I demystify finances for 7 & 8 figure business owners | Founder @ Celerity Accounting | Top 100 Proadvisor 2024

I’m Tailor Hartman, founder and CEO of Celerity Accounting.

We’re a fractional accounting and advisory firm for 7 and 8-figure businesses using NetSuite and QuickBooks Online.

If your books are messy, your reports are unclear, or you’re scaling fast without the right financial visibility, we’re the team that fixes it.

A few milestones along the way:

- Named one of CPA Practice Advisor’s “40 Under 40 CPAs in the Profession” 
- Built Celerity from a solo operation into a trusted partner for $5–50M businesses.
- Launched a modern firm owner newsletter called "The Net Effect" for accountants

We partner with e-commerce, manufacturing, and other growth-minded companies to turn chaos into clarity.

Because accounting shouldn’t just be about compliance. It should be a system that drives better decisions, faster growth, and fewer surprises.

At Celerity, we don’t just clean up your numbers. We own the outcome. That means clear communication, controller-level oversight, and real partnership.

If your NetSuite or QBO setup isn’t doing its job, let’s fix it.

Happy to connect and share what we’ve learned!

Email: info@celerity.io
X: @tailor_hartman
https://linktr.ee/tailorh

Tailor Hartman

Reflecting on Celerity Accounting's 4th anniversary this week.

I’m incredibly proud of what we’ve built. The team. The clients. The impact.

To me, year 4 was the year we decided which lane to be in.

- We leaned fully into NetSuite.
- We committed to the mid-market.
- We stopped trying to be everything to everyone.

In the first three years, we rarely said no.

In year four, we said no every single week.

And that changed so much for the firm.

- Better alignment.
- Stronger clients.
- Clearer positioning.

We're more focused than ever. 
Here's to a more intentional 5th year!

P.S. thanks Miggy's Bakes for the incredible cake!

Founder @ Celerity | Building the modern NetSuite accounting firm for mid-market companies

Celerity Accounting turned 4!

What started as a side gig to pay off student loans has grown into a modern, mid-market focused accounting firm serving dozens of amazing companies across the US. 

Over the past four years, we’ve:

• Built a team that values relationships and results
• Helped growing companies strengthen their financial infrastructure
• Focused on continuous improvement both for our clients and ourselves.

To our clients, partners, and team members: thank you for trusting us and growing alongside us.

Here's to making year 5 the best year yet!

Here's a new job posting for Celerity Accounting for a NetSuite Accountant.

 Know anyone who might be interested?

Apply below ⬇️

Bringing clarity, speed & automation to $5–50M SMBs | Founder @ Celerity

I had to stop thinking like an accountant to grow my firm.

For most of my career, my job was simple: make sure the numbers were right.

That’s what we’re trained to do as accountants.

But running a firm forces you to think differently.

At some point, you stop being just an accountant and become a full-time operator.

Accounting optimizes for accuracy.
And accuracy is a lagging signal.

It rewards you for being right after the fact.

But growing a firm depends on being early enough to act.

By the time something is fully accurate, the decision window is usually gone.

That’s the difference.

An accountant focuses on what happened.
An operator cares about what’s happening and what’s about to happen.

An accountant is comfortable once the month is closed.
An operator is uneasy if they can’t see what’s happening mid-month.

An accountant protects the integrity of the numbers.
An operator protects the business from surprises.

Accounting thinking is designed to explain outcomes while operating thinking is designed to shape them.

Both are necessary.
Only one grows the firm.

That doesn’t mean accounting is wrong.

It means the role changes.

Because the business changes.

And eventually, you have to change with it.

Looking for an opportunity at a great place to work?

We’re looking for someone who:
- Thinks beyond debits and credits
- Likes improving systems
- Loves helping people
- Has experience in Netsuite

If you know of someone or if that's you, here's the link to apply --> https://bit.ly/4qZOC6W

Looking for a new role?

If you have experience with:
- Netsuite
- Working with clients
- Month-end Accounting

Please apply here --> https://bit.ly/4qZOC6W

You were hired to do the accounting.

But that’s rarely where it stops.

You start by cleaning up the books.

Then you realize data is flowing between systems without controls. Sales updates forecasts manually at month end. Reporting depends on one person’s spreadsheet.

So you step in.

You redesign a workflow.
You help formalize compensation logic.
You suggest a better approval structure.

This is the part most firms pretend isn’t happening.

We say we’re “just doing accounting.”

But modern CAS, especially in mid-market companies, inevitably touches operations.

The numbers are downstream from the process.

If the process is fragile, the reporting will be too.

So the real question isn’t whether this work shows up.

It will.

The question is whether you treat it as accidental scope creep.

Or you acknowledge it and design your firm around it intentionally.

Modern accounting doesn’t stay in its lane.

It can’t.

Reliable financials require reliable operations. 

And that work doesn’t happen by accident.

No alternative text description for this image

Accountants overestimate the risk of starting their own firm and underestimate the risk of staying where they are.

A defined role feels stable.
A steady paycheck feels safe.
A clear promotion track feels predictable.

But none of those things are guaranteed.

What is guaranteed?

You already have marketable skills.

You know how to manage deadlines. How to communicate with clients. How to solve financial problems under pressure.

Starting your own firm isn’t some irreversible leap.

It’s a test.

You take on a few clients, see if you enjoy it, learn what you’re missing, and adjust.

If it works, you build something on your terms.

If it doesn’t, you get another job.

When I left, I didn’t have a brand, a niche, or a scalable lead engine. I had experience and the willingness to figure it out.

That was enough.

If you’ve built real skills and have even a modest financial runway, the downside is smaller than you think.

Bet on yourself.

Worst case?
You go back to a job.

Best case?
You build the firm you’ve always wanted to work for.

That’s a bet worth making.

—

PS - If you're an accountant or firm owner looking for real-world insights, relevant news, and useful tech recommendations, check out my free newsletter: https://lnkd.in/gDv-_Fpw

We’re publishing our first guest edition of The Net Effect on Monday and it's with Tom Zehentner, CPA!

He wrote about:
– Being social on social media
– Why cringe is the cost of opportunity
– How to post in a way that doesn’t feel manufactured

If you write online(or want to), you’ll like this one.

Don't miss it! 

https://lnkd.in/gDv-_Fpw

undefined undefined

QuickBooks Online Certification Level 1

QuickBooks Certified ProAdvisor

Certified Public Accountant

QuickBooks Online

Learn how to automate the accounting for your small business with this guide

How to Elevate & Automate your Accounting

I demystify finances for $5-50M SMBs | Founder @ Celerity Accounting | 40 under 40 CPA

My name is Tailor Hartman. I am the founder and CEO of Celerity Accounting, a fractional accounting & advisory firm for 7 & 8 figure businesses using QuickBooks Online or NetSuite. I am also an:

- Accounting Instructor
- 40 Under 40 CPA's in the Profession - CPA Practice Advisor
- Business accounting writer/content creator


Interested in hearing more? Let's chat!

Email: info@celerity.io
X: @tailor_hartman
https://linktr.ee/tailorh

Book a Consultation Call

Helped sort food and answer phones to raise food and money to feed those who cannot afford food. 

QuickBooks is better with FinOptimal.

I just took the Working Genius assessment.

It breaks work into 6 stages:

1. Wonder - identifying problems
2. Invention - generating ideas
3. Discernment - evaluating what will work
4. Galvanizing - driving action
5. Enablement - supporting execution
6. Tenacity - finishing and ensuring completion

It’s designed to show which types of tasks give you energy and which ones drain it.

For me, coming up with ideas and evaluating them feels natural.

Driving every detail to completion? Not so much.

I can still do it but it just costs more energy.

Where this gets interesting is at the team level.

A lot of what we call “misalignment” is really energy mismatch.

One person is wired to question and invent. Another is wired to push things across the finish line.

If you expect everyone to thrive in every stage, you create unnecessary friction.

The more clearly you understand:

• What energizes you
• What drains you
• And who naturally complements you

The easier it is to design roles around strengths instead of trying to make everyone good at everything.

Highly recommend taking it if you have a team.

—

PS - If you're an accountant or firm owner looking for real-world insights, relevant news, and useful tech recommendations, check out my free newsletter: https://lnkd.in/gDv-_Fpw

I care more about taste than tactics.

Tactics are visible.

• New niche
• New service lines
• New pricing model

You can point to them, market them, sell them.

Taste is invisible.

When I look at the firms I actually respect, it’s not their tactics that stand out.

It’s what they say no to.

They don’t do everything.
They don’t chase every client.
They don’t say yes just to protect revenue.

They’ve decided who they are (and who they aren’t).

That’s taste.

• Saying no to work you could technically do
• Telling a client you’re not the right firm for that
• Raising prices instead of adding more to justify them

Anyone can learn tactics.

Very few people develop judgment.

Software will change.
Rules will change.
AI will automate the mechanics.

But knowing what to leave out? What to simplify? What to refuse?

That’s the real differentiator.

I don’t want to win because we do more.

I want to win because we are better at what we do.

If your financials are slow, you’re spending 95% of the time guessing.

This is something I’ve noticed over and over again working with growing companies.

The businesses that scale smoothly don’t magically have a better strategy.

What they have is a faster feedback loop.

They know revenue is down by the second week, not at the end of the month.

They know spend is running hot by day 10, not when the P&L shows up.

They catch working capital tightening during the month, not once vendors are calling.

That changes how the business feels day to day.

The companies that struggle usually aren’t careless or poorly run.

They’re just late.

Late to notice.
Late to react.
Late to adjust.

And when feedback shows up late, every decision turns reactive by default.

So the real question isn’t, “How do we scale faster?”

It’s, “How quickly do we find out when something is off?”

That comes down to cadence.

If you only review revenue, spend, and cash after the month closes, you’re always looking in the rearview mirror.

As you scale, the goal isn’t to eliminate 100% of problems.

That’s unrealistic.

The goal is to shrink the gap between what’s happening and when you can see it.

That gap is the difference between guessing and actually being in control.

This is live!

Check it out here --> https://lnkd.in/gFRdG55T

I scaled and sold a 7-figure accounting firm in 5 years. Now, through my Future Firm newsletter, I'm giving 9,500+ firm owners the tactics, templates, and frameworks I used to do it.

Ryan Lazanis

Came back from a 2-week vacation to a prank from the team.

Opened Missive and thought it was glitching... and everyone suddenly had the same profile photo.

MINE.

(I literally clicked refresh on my screen a few times to make sure it wasn’t a bug.)

Then I joined the Zoom call for our weekly meeting.

Every single person had Ryan Lazanis as their Zoom name. And everyone kept calling each other “Ryan.”

Needless to say... I was super confused for about 10 minutes. They got me good!

Hope everyone’s still having fun with their teams out there 🙂

Ryan Lazanis, CPA

Giving systems to firm owners to unlock freedom and growth

There are 26,759 people in my LinkedIn network, and a good chunk are firm owners.

If you’re open to it, drop a link to your firm’s website below, happy to share feedback on a few if that’s helpful.

And also... let’s use the comments section to help folks who are just getting started or looking for ideas.

I’ll also post some firm websites I really like as examples. 🙂

Edit:

Ooof! 75+ websites to review!

I made 1 video that covers the basics of website do's and don'ts and then I reviewed at least half of the websites in this thread. Hope this helps!!!

https://lnkd.in/eKMu8kGK

Strangers pay $1,500 for a tax return. Friends and family pay $700.

Would you let that happen in your firm?

I understand why it does.

You don’t want it to feel awkward. 

You want to help. 

I’m actually a big believer in separating personal and professional relationships for that exact reason.

(I did it with my immediate family, didn’t charge them. But I didn’t want to work with friends.)

Because that $800 difference could be:

– the margin that funds your next hire
– the difference between a 35-hour week and a 50-hour week
– or the full-price client you now don’t have room for

Nothing wrong with favors and helping people you care about. 

Just decide in advance what that looks like.

Maybe it’s:

→ 2 pro-bono returns a year
→ a fixed “friends rate” that still protects your margin
→ or no discounts, but extra care

Just make sure it’s a conscious choice, not something you default to because it feels uncomfortable to say the number out loud.

Because over time, those small decisions quietly shape the kind of firm you end up running.

...

Serious question (but also not):
Do you have a rule for this... or do you decide based on how much you like them? 😂

3 months after selling my firm, I tried being a “company of one.”

No team. Just me.

Well, seems I didn’t stick to that, because 6 years later I’m running a 10-person team, lol.

Some people are fine keeping things solo. Nothing wrong with that.

Others have a natural tendency to want to build, grow and bust through ceilings.

I fall into the latter category.

In the end, I didn't stay a company of one because...

→ There’s something in me that wants to bust through the ceiling even if it’s hard
→ I want to expand my impact on others
→ I don’t enjoy the status quo and staying at a certain level would make me anxious

I know plenty of people who want to grow, build a team, and scale.

But I also know people in my network who went solo and are crushing it (hi, Erica)

Both paths work. They just come with different tradeoffs.

Clients ain't gonna leave you because their books were off by $83.

They leave because they felt:

– confused
– judged
– ignored
– talked down to
– like a ticket in a queue

And accuracy isn’t a differentiator for your firm. It’s the bare minimum to stay in business.

So if your firm’s marketing is basically:

✅ “We’re accurate.”
✅ “We’re detail-oriented.”
✅ “We know tax.”

...you’re describing every firm -- and also every piece of software your client is already paying for. 

What clients actually pay for now?

CERTAINTY. 

The feeling that someone competent is driving and they can stop white-knuckling the steering wheel.

That’s the outcome.
 
Then communication is the mechanism.

Because your clients don’t experience your technical skill, they experience:

→ how fast you reply
→ whether you explain things like a human
→ whether you sound calm when they’re stressed
→ whether you give options instead of jargon
→ whether they leave calls feeling clearer... or smaller

I’ve said this before:

The firm that makes clients feel calm will beat the firm that’s “technically perfect.”

Every time. 🙂

Hey LinkedIn. I've been on vacay for 2 weeks. Other than nonstop talk about Claude vs. ChatGPT, did I miss anything?

Linda is your Tax Manager.

Linda is also your Director of Operations.

Linda is exhausted.

But you didn’t plan it.

She was good, she was trusted, she was there, so whenever the firm needed something, Linda got the call.

Next thing you know, Linda's doing two completely different jobs under one salary and telling everyone she's fine.

SHE IS NOT FINE.

Every single day she's choosing between the client work that's due and the operational stuff that's been sitting on the back burner since January. 

Client work wins. It always wins. 

→ So the processes never get built 
→ The team stuff gets half the attention it needs 
→ The internal fixes just keep waiting

And because she's good, because she never complains, never misses a deadline, never makes it your problem, you don't notice how unsustainable it actually is.

Until she burns out. Or leaves. Or both.

Linda deserves one job with actual focus and actual ownership and a to-do list that a normal human being could reasonably finish.

Go check on your Linda. 🙂

A hard truth: 

Your best team member might quit... even if they like you.

Because liking you doesn’t pay rent.

If you want to keep A-players, it’s usually not about perks.

It’s about 5 things:

1) Clarity

→ What does “great” look like here? 
→ What matters this week? 
→ What doesn’t?

2) Fair pay (above market)

High performers know their value. 
If you’re “competitive,” you’re competing... with everyone.

3) Flexibility

Just enough trust to live like a human. 🙂

4) No micromanagement

If you hired them for ownership… don’t take it back the second they do it differently than you would.

5) Ask better questions (instead of jumping to conclusions)

Before “why didn’t you do X?” try:

→ “What happened?”
→ “What got in the way?”
→ “What would make this easier next time?”

Most A-players don’t leave after one hard week.

They leave when they realize:

“This is just how it’s going to be here.”

…

P.S. Ever left somewhere you liked… because the offer was better?

Confession from a coaching client of mine:

“I love an accounting firm business, but I don't love accounting.”

Is that a problem?

My answer:

Heck no, it's not a problem! Some of the best firm owners out there are pretty terrible accountants.

Thoughts?

My #1 fan has read every newsletter since 2018. She’s 92.

And she doesn’t understand most of what I write.

I write 3 email newsletters a week.

I try my best to make them as insightful and as valuable as humanly possible, yet in a digestible way.

I will admit that sometimes, I write a newsletter because I think it'll be fun for me and at least one other person.

One of the newsletters I sent a few weeks ago is one of those... because I wrote it for one of my fans, who is my grandmother.

Otherwise known as Nanny.

She's been a reader of my newsletter since my very first edition on Nov. 28, 2018!

The photo below is of us playing jarts up north at the cottage.

(Side note: Jarts were banned in Canada and the US in the 80's after 6,100 emergency room injuries in an 8-year span)

She reads every single one of my newsletters, even if she doesn't understand what the heck I'm saying.

You'll no doubt have #1 fans in your business as well.

It's important you give them the recognition they deserve and make them feel important.

Thanks for being a #1 fan, Nanny!

P.S. If you want the newsletter (Nanny-approved-ish), you can subscribe here: https://lnkd.in/edg-g5T8

P.P.S. Who is your #1 fan? Give them a shout-out in the comments 🙂

I hired the most expensive option twice last year. On purpose.

In both cases, the person I chose was by far the priciest.

One was my coach (about 4x the next best option).

The other was a $35k software migration expert (roughly 10x the alternative I was considering).

So why do some people charge way more... and still get the deal?

One BIG reason:

Their marketing pre-sold me.

My coach’s newsletter + content hit exactly what I was dealing with. It felt like, “yep, this person gets my world.”

Same with the migration expert.

Before we ever spoke, I already felt confident they’d seen my problem before and knew the path through it.

Here’s what made those stand out:

When I actually got into sales conversations with other options... a lot of it felt transactional.

– Quick chats
– Scripted questions 
– Well-trained reps

It all felt like “a process.”

My coach’s process felt different. 

– Warmer 
– Human 
– Like a real conversation

And that’s what made me choose him. I trusted him. 

That trust didn’t start with the proposal.

It started months earlier… with content that hit exactly what I was dealing with, and a process that felt genuine.

That’s why clients will pay 10x more for some firms and not blink.

Because when your marketing pre-sells and your process builds confidence…

…price somehow stops being the deciding factor. 🙂

I often decline “good opportunities” in my business.

(Even when they’re enticing, and even when they pay well)

It took me longer than it should have to learn that sometimes the “best” opportunities are the ones that quietly knock you off course.

Especially when:

→ They’re not aligned with where you’re taking the business
→ They’re not aligned with how you want to operate
→ They create momentum in a direction you don’t actually want

So here’s a simple filter I use (and I give to firm owners I coach) to decide fast without overthinking:

Before you say yes, answer these 3 questions:

1) Does this move the one thing I’m focused on right now?
2) What will this steal time from? (Be specific.)
3) What momentum does this create?

If the answers aren’t a clear yes, it’s a no. 

But there are exceptions.

If it genuinely helps the people you already serve, maybe consider it.

If you’re truly curious and want to learn, maybe.

Some people thrive on being everywhere. 

Ten events in 3 months, 7 podcasts a month, partnerships coming out of their ears. That energizes them.

That’s great if that’s you.

Some of us are just not wired that way.

I just constantly remind myself (and the firm owners I coach) that every yes, even the good ones, has a tradeoff.

5 things that could make an angry client *happily* pay you double:

(And keep you top of mind.) 

1) Give them peace of mind.
2) Flag bad news early.
3) Avoid all the nasty surprises.
4) Make them feel taken care of.
5) Apologize when you mess up.

The last one is the big one.

Because when something goes wrong, most firms default to: “That’s not our fault.”

And maybe it technically isn’t.

When a frustrated client reaches out, there's almost always something you could have done better.

(I say "almost always" because there are some clients that just plain stink.)

We all make mistakes.

The difference is whether you defend... or you take ownership.

Clients don’t pay more because you’re perfect.

They pay more because they trust you.

And trust grows when you:

– Flag issues before they discover them
– Take responsibility without excuses
– Fix things quickly and calmly

If you apply that across the firm, something interesting happens:

You deliver a better experience, clients happily pay you more, you serve fewer of them, and still make the same (or more) money.

Win-win.

If my COO could have awarded me with a trophy soon after she was hired, it might have been this. 

She was hired because I detest anything related to operations.

Putting systems and processes in place.

Hiring, interviewing, and onboarding.

Managing a team.

All that kind of stuff...

Maybe 6 weeks in, she sent me a Loom which had a few of these lines in it:

→ “You hired me to get you out of the weeds. But you're getting yourself into the weeds.”
→ “You are holding on to those reins tight.”
→ “You are in the nitty-gritty weeds.”
→ “You have to take your hands off of everything.”

And this beaut:

→ “I need you to get out the way.” 💣 💣 💣

Point made!

Did I mention she's quite direct? 😂

It was a bit of a wake-up call for me, truthfully.

Because all this time I didn't think I was that bad.

But seems I was.

And the reason I share all this is because I actually see the same kind of "control freak" personality traits in those I coach.

They're involved in EVERYTHING in the firm, making sure things are perfect.

And it kinda makes sense:

Because accountants have been trained to get things just right.

To balance every penny.

(Can you imagine if the books didn't balance?!)

But that doesn't translate well into running a business where things don't actually need to be perfect.

That's because having control over everything means you'll bottleneck.

Which means you sacrifice freedom and growth.

In fact, my COO had this piece of advice, which I think may be helpful if you struggle with being a control freak:

✅ “It's OK to let things breathe.”
✅ “It's OK to let some balls drop.”

If you want to have the type of business where you're hands-off, the pivot starts with you. 🙂

When I was much younger, I’d take almost any job.

Didn’t care who it was for. 

I just wanted the experience.

A foot in the door.

A paycheck.

So when I tried to hire for my own firm, I assumed others felt the same. 

I thought:

Post a role, pick someone, done.

But here’s the part I didn’t think through:

(And one I wish more new firm owners would hear)

Just because people need jobs... doesn’t mean they’ll want yours.

Some firm owners post a role and expect applications to flood in, then they get frustrated when the “right” person doesn’t show up.

But hiring isn’t one-sided.

You have to work for it before someone says yes.

That means:
→ Clear expectations
→ A real career path
→ Flexibility (because yes, they care)
→ A reason they’d choose YOU over 10 other job posts that all sound the same

If your mindset is “someone will take this, people need jobs”...

You’re going to attract the wrong people and deal with way bigger problems later. 

Top talent doesn’t just want a job anymore. 

→ They want direction
→ Stability 
→ Flexibility 
→ They want to know what they’re walking into.

If that part’s unclear or not at all appealing, they’ll move on. 

So build something worth joining.

Then someone great will say yes. 

P.S. Any tips you’d add to help attract top talent?

I’ve met a lot of “successful” firm owners who aren’t happy.

And I don’t mean their business is falling apart because on paper, it’s doing great.

When they say that, I don’t doubt them.

But I usually ask a few quiet questions to get a fuller picture:

- Are you happy?
- Are your clients happy?
- Is your team happy? 
- Is the firm actually generating the profit you want?

If even one of those is off...

Then maybe things aren’t as great as they seem.

Because on the surface, things can look fine. 

But behind the scenes, things are barely holding it together.

→ Revenue is growing... but so is stress.
→ Clients are staying… but you’re not sure why. 
→ The team’s working… but burning out quietly. 
→ And you haven’t taken a real break in months (or years). 

This is more common than most people admit, especially in firms that are “doing well.”

It doesn’t mean that you’re failing. 

But it’s a sign to slow down and ask the right questions.

Not always fun to hear:

But if you want your firm to grow without everything flowing back to you, the work starts with you. 

Easier said than done...

Which is why I'm excited to present on this subject on March 25 during the Bookkeeping Workflow Summit with several other fantastic presenters.

My specific session is titled:

How to Stop Being Your Firm’s Bottleneck: A 3-Step Program

(It's free and virtual so you can attend in your pajamas. 🙂)

Register here to attend or catch the recording: https://lnkd.in/eTDVFkTE 

Also I’m excited to do this alongside some seriously good people: ⚡️Roman Villard, CPA, Kellie Parks, CPB, FCPB, Greg Scholten, EA, and George Abdelmessih.

A weird metric I love:

“How often does your team solve something without telling you?”

If the answer is “never”... that’s worth looking at.

Here’s why:

→ It usually means they don’t feel safe making decisions
→ They don’t have clear standards to lean on
→ They don’t have decision rights
→ They’re missing context
→ You’re too fast to fix

A few practical moves that don’t feel like babysitting:

1) Stop answering on the spot.

“Make the call and tell me what you decided.”

(Watch how fast ownership shows up.)

2) When they bring a problem, ask one question:

“What do you think we should do?”

3) Pick one area and fully hand it over.

4) Let them be wrong sometimes.

Never in a catastrophic way. But if there’s no room to miss... there’s no room to lead.

One more thing:

I’m not saying all this from some perfect leadership pedestal.

I still catch myself jumping in too fast sometimes.

But I’m just committed to improving them.

That’s the work.

POV: Different ways people handle tax season stress 🔥

Which one are you?

P.S. This was taken during our team retreat in Bohol in 2025. Yes, the fire was real!

Most firm owners try to prove ROI with numbers.

But the best ROI is often... 

Relief.

If your client sleeps better because you’re on top of their mess, that’s value. 🙂

taplio

The Battle

Tailor Hartman

Ryan Lazanis

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTailor Hartman's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRyan Lazanis's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Tailor Hartman

Ryan Lazanis

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tailor Hartman's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRyan Lazanis's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTailor Hartman's LinkedIn Performance