I help financial leaders generate leads with AI on LinkedIn | LinkedIn Marketing Specialist

I'm Tim Sergev, the COO at Pipeline Upgrade. We help UK IT providers fill their calendars with qualified meetings without the gamble of retainers or hiring SDRs.

We've delivered 2,500+ qualified meetings and generated £10M+ in client revenue by solving one critical problem: getting IT providers in front of buyers exactly when they're ready to switch.


HERE'S HOW WE WORK:

You tell us your ICP (company size, sector, services, buying signals). We find them, qualify them, and book the meetings. You only pay when they show up qualified.

No retainers. No ramp periods. No wasted ad spend.


WE CAN HELP YOU IF:

- You're an MSP, VAR, or IT reseller doing consistent revenue but growth has plateaued. You need predictable pipeline without hiring a sales team

- You've burned cash on retainer agencies (£5K+/month) that delivered reports instead of meetings. You want results you can actually measure

- You want 10-20 qualified meetings per month with IT buyers actively evaluating new providers


REAL RESULTS:

• One client got 80 meetings in 60 days and created a £2M pipeline. 

• Another invested £10K with us and signed a £250K contract.

• Our meeting rejection rate sits below 10% (most agencies are 30%+).


SO IF YOU:

- Are a UK IT services provider doing £10M+ annually
- Sell solutions with contract values £20K+
- Want your sales team calendar filled with qualified IT buyers

Send me a DM, or book free consultation at 👉 https://www.pipelineupgrade.com/

Tim Sergeev

Writing SOPs doesn't mean your operations are good.

It only means you wrote instructions.

And there's a big difference.

Many companies think this is operations:

→ Write a SOP
→ Share it with the team
→ Hope people follow it

That's not operations, that's documentation.

Let's take a simple example.

Imagine you run an e-commerce store.

You create a SOP for refunds.

The SOP says:

→ Customers send an email with the request
→ Someone reviews it
→ The team processes the refund

Better than nothing, but the process is still loose.

Because:

→ People can skip steps.
→ Information can be missing.
→ Nobody knows exactly where the request is.

Now compare that with a defined process.

1. Customer receives a damaged product.
2. Customer submits a claim form
3. Once a claim form is submitted
    ↳ A ticket is created automatically
    ↳ A responsible person is assigned
    ↳ The case enters a predefined workflow

Then the system guides the next steps.

→ Review
→ Approval or rejection
→ Resolution

At every stage you can see:

→ how many cases are open
→ how many are resolved
→ who is responsible
→ how long each step takes

You see the difference ;)

SOPs explain what should happen.

Whereas operations make sure it actually happens.

--- 

Tim Sergeev
COO @ Pipeline Upgrade
I make business run smoothly

COO @ Pipeline Upgrade | Helping UK MSPs Win More Deals by Giving Early Access to Verified IT Contract Renewal Opportunities

There's a difference between paying for a service and paying for a result.

It's not about pricing.

It's about risk.

Most companies sell services.

You pay the monthly fee. They deliver the activity.

→ Campaigns launched
→ Content published
→ Outreach sent

What happens after that is uncertain. Nobody guarantees results.

------

Now, let's compare that to:

“Pay X. Get Y.”

The moment the outcome is defined, the model changes.

Because someone carries the risk.

In a service model:
→ The client carries performance risk.

In a result model:
→ The provider carries performance risk.

That's why pay-by-result is harder to offer.

It requires:
1. Predictable systems.
2. Operational control.
3. Confidence in your numbers.

------

As a COO, I can tell you this:

If your internal systems are not tight, you simply cannot offer results safely.

In our case, everything is structured around delivery.

→ clear metrics
→ measurable inputs
→ controlled processes
→ transparent reporting

That's the only reason a result-based model works.

------

Now I have a question for you.

When you select a service provider

Would you rather carry the risk or work with someone who does?

𝐀𝐈 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐬𝐭 | 𝐅𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 | 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫 | 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐈 | 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐖𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫

As a software developer with 3 years of experience, I am passionate about crafting high-quality software that solves complex problems and delivers value to end-users. With a strong background in Flutter,ASP .NET and Database technologies, I thrive on collaborating with cross-functional teams to design and implement solutions that meet business requirements.

My expertise spans the entire software development lifecycle, from requirements gathering and architecture design to coding, testing, deployment, and maintenance. I am comfortable working with a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and tools, and am always eager to learn new technologies to expand my skill set.

If you are looking for a software developer who can help you achieve your business goals, please don't hesitate to get in touch. I am excited to explore new opportunities and to leverage my skills and experience to deliver value to your organization.

taplio

The Battle

Tim Sergeev

Aakash K.

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTim Sergeev's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Tim Sergeev

Aakash K.

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tim Sergeev's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTim Sergeev's LinkedIn Performance