I will build your personal brand on LinkedIn | LinkedIn Organic Growth Strategist | Content Marketing | LinkedIn B2B Marketing

Vedika Bhaia

Founder

We mostly help people with:
-Social Media Marketing, 
-Content Marketing 
-LinkedIn Marketing

So far I've taught over 4000+ people about How to  make your LinkedIn account a Lead Magnet. My entire Linkedin Startegy (from 300 to 165k followers) on a plate, served hot.

this image broke my brain a little.
go talk to anyone outside your bubble for 5 minutes.
most people don't even know what claude is. or perplexity. or cursor.

let me breakdown the image for you

each dot = 3.2 million people.
2,500 dots for 8.1 billion humans.

84% of those dots are grey, which means 6.8 billion people have never touched AI.
not "don't use it regularly." 
never used it. not once.

green = 1.3 billion free chatbot users. 
yellow = 15-25 million paying users. 0.3%. 
red = 2-5 million building with AI. 0.04%.

we sit in that red dot arguing about saturation.
6.8 billion people haven't even shown up yet. the doors haven't opened.

this is what first mover advantage will look like if you learn AI.

this is the most powerful content writing prompt you’ll ever use.
plug this into Claude with 3-5 of your best posts, and it will literally write LinkedIn content that sounds exactly like you.

hooks, personal stories, founder content, thought leadership posts - literally anything.

takes less than 10 minutes to set up and you don't need to comment anything to get the prompt lol

saw this on reddit and it's been stuck in my head since.
after your first 20-30 crore, a paid-off flat, and a decent car, there is no real difference in quality of life between you and a billionaire. 

you both have the same 24 hours. you both sit in the same traffic. you probably have more free time than him. 

so who's actually richer?
a plate of dal chawal tastes the same whether a billionaire eats it or you do.

money is a piece of paper or a number in your app. 
real life is chai on the balcony, morning walks, calling your mother without needing a reason.

become financially independent in India, that's roughly 20-30 crore, maybe lesser. 

eat good home cooked food. keep your relationships close. move your body. sleep well. call your parents. 

that's all there is to life. greed has no end. ask anyone stuck chasing the next promotion for the last ten years.

time is the currency of life. money is not.

the man with 50 crore in the bank but no time to attend his kid's annual day is not rich. 

the man who takes 3pm walks and eats lunch with his family is.
the sooner you figure this out, the happier you will be.

EDIT: too many comments, so sharing the link here: https://lnkd.in/gqN2Q49r

claude opus 4.6 just dropped and your feed is about to be flooded with prompt lists. most of them are useless without context. here's what actually works and why. (giveaway at the end)

instead of saving prompt lists you'll never open again, just try these 4. i use them almost every day.

1. creating SOPs without losing your mind

most people prompt: "help me create an SOP for onboarding clients"
that's like walking into a restaurant and saying "make food."
prompt this instead:
"you're an operations specialist. create a step-by-step client onboarding SOP for a [your industry] agency. the process starts when a client signs the contract and ends after [first deliverable]. include: exact timeline (day 1, day 2, etc.), who's responsible for each step (account manager vs content writer vs designer), what tools are used at each stage, and red flags to watch for. format it so a new hire with zero experience could follow it perfectly."
why it works: you gave it a role, a clear start and end point, specific structure, and a benchmark for quality. that's the difference between a generic checklist and something you'd actually hand to your team.

2. dissecting a viral post
most people prompt: "why did this post go viral"
prompt this instead:
"here's a linkedin post that got 50,000+ impressions [paste post]. do a full dissection: rate the hook out of 10 and explain why it works or doesn't. analyze the structure — white space, scannability, story flow. evaluate the CTA. identify the emotional trigger (curiosity, FOMO, personal confession, controversy). tell me what content bucket this falls into. then give me a reusable template where i can swap the topic but keep the same structure."

3. sales call prep
most people prompt: "help me prepare for a sales call"
prompt this instead:
"i have a discovery call tomorrow with a [role] who runs a [company size/type]. they found us through [channel]. help me prepare: 5 questions to uncover their pain points, 3 specific things i should observe about their linkedin before the call, 2 ways to frame pricing without leading with the number, a one-liner that communicates our value without sounding like a pitch, and the 3 most common objections someone at this level has — with my response to each."

i've put together 100 prompts like these for content writing, sales, outreach, hiring, and daily learning.
 
comment "PROMPT" and i'll send them to you.

People tell me i'm disciplined because i've worked out 3-4 times a week for 5 years. discipline actually has nothing to do with it.

At some point, going to the gym stopped being a decision. it became who i am. there's no internal debate. no "should i go today?" i just go. the same way i brush my teeth.

and i think that's what most people get wrong about change. they focus on what they want. "i want to lose 5kg." "i want to earn more." "i want better relationships."

when you chase outcomes, you have to make a decision every single day. the only thing driving you is a result that isn't here yet. so every morning becomes "do i feel like it today?" and some days you won't. so you skip. then you skip again. then you're "starting fresh from monday" for the third time this year.

you don't get what you want. you get who you are.

your income reflects what you believe you're allowed to earn. your relationships reflect what you believe you deserve. your health reflects how you relate to your body. nothing in my life changed until my identity changed. not my goals. not my habits. my identity.

there are three layers to change. outcomes (what you get), processes (what you do), identity (who you are). most people start at layer 1. maybe work on layer 2. real change happens when you flip it.

instead of "i want to be fit," i asked "what does a fit person do?" a fit person trains. they don't negotiate with themselves. so i train. not because i'm chasing a goal. because that's just who i am.

simple.

Without naming your  job, tell me something you say 100 times everyday at work.
Here’s mine: “the hook sounds too AI. rewrite it.”

No alternative text description for this image

this week in AI was not normal. read this post slowly and carefully if you use ANY AI tool.

--> the head of safety research at Anthropic quit. said "the world is in peril." moved to the UK to write poetry and "become invisible."

--> half of xAI's co-founders have now left. the latest one said recursive self-improvement loops go live within the next 12 months.

--> anthropic's own safety report revealed something wild → claude can detect when it's being tested and changes its behavior accordingly.

--> yoshua bengio, one of the godfathers of AI, confirmed it. "we're seeing AIs whose behavior when tested is different from when they're being used." and no, it's not a coincidence.

--> bytedance released seedance 2.0. a filmmaker with 7 years of experience said 90% of his skills can already be replaced by it.

--> the US government declined to back the 2026 international AI safety report. first time ever.

i'm not trying to fear monger. this is just what happened in one week.

what do you guys think?

source: @milesdeutscher

i scroll past more posts on LinkedIn because all it’s full of AI slop 
the classic em dash ( — ) , “here's what nobody talks about..” etc 
let me give you a prompt to end this:

see i use AI every day at my agency. my team uses it too. AI is not the problem. lazy prompting is which is why most of you say things like:

--> posts that open with "most people think X. but here's what nobody talks about..."
I've read that exact line 40 times this week from 40 different people.

--> em dashes thrown in everywhere for no reason. five of them in a single post. AI just can't stop.

--> "and do you know what i learned from all this?" 
nobody talks like that in real life.

--> "the kicker?"
who talks like this

--> Classic emoji subheadings: 
🚀 stop we are not in class 2💡 

so doing myself a favour and made this prompt that strips out all of these patterns and actually makes your content sound like you wrote it.

I’m someone who usually can tell if a video is AI or not immediately, but holy shit what did I just see.

6 months ago, AI videos were painfully obvious. 

stiff movements. dead expressions. weird robotic speech.
cut-to now they have
→ natural head movements 
→ casual "umms" in speech 
→ the person looks away from camera while thinking 
→ slight hand gestures while talking

I didn’t even think it video was AI tell I realized this never happened in breaking bad lol

to know which tools were used comment tools and i'll send it to you. 

just kidding, this was made using Seedance and Kling.

A hacker used Claude to steal 150GB of Mexican government data. 
the same Claude my team uses for 70% of our work. 
Here's how Claude agreed to it:

--> they told Claude they were doing a bug bounty
--> Claude said no, this violates safety guidelines
--> the hacker just kept asking
--> Claude gave in

once it agreed, it went all in:
--> wrote attack scripts
--> found vulnerabilities
--> generated thousands of reports telling the hacker exactly what to go after next

the hacker got into Mexico's federal tax authority, the national electoral institute, and four state governments. walked away with 195 million taxpayer records, voter data, and government employee credentials.

this isn't a reason to stop using AI. it's a reason to take AI security seriously. because right now most companies (including governments apparently) aren't ready for what's coming.

claude i still love you though, and will keep using you, just not to hack the government lol

I ghostwrite Educational Email Courses for Content Agency Founders | Ghostwritten 5001+ SEO-optimized Articles in 5+ Years | LinkedIn Ghostwriter for 6-figure Founders |

🚀 $15K in sales for a client in less than 7 days (without ads or cold outreach)

A coach once told me:
"𝐼’𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠. 𝑃𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡…
𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝑚𝑦 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛’𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑑."

You know your coaching delivers real transformation.

Still…

You’re stuck in a system that keeps you busy,
But never gets you booked.

→ You post consistently, but it doesn’t translate into leads
→ You’re getting likes, but your Stripe account isn’t moving
→ You’re doing everything right, but feel like nothing’s working
→ You’re spending hours following up manually instead of coaching

And all of it leads to:
𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗼𝘂𝘁. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵.

Now imagine this:

→ Your LinkedIn content positions you as the go-to expert
↳ without you ever writing a post.

→ Your ideal clients don’t just like your content 
↳ they enter your email funnel, learn from you, trust you, and convert.

→ You wake up to warm leads in your inbox
↳ without chasing or pushing.

That’s the power of a complete ecosystem.

This is exactly what I build for coaches like you:

→ A 𝐃𝐅𝐘 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝𝐈𝐧 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞 that builds visibility + authority
→ A 𝐅𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐄𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐄𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 that nurtures silently and sells smart
→ A system that works in the background—while you coach, scale, and grow

If you're done guessing, posting, and hoping…
Let’s build a system that finally does the heavy lifting for you!

→ READY TO SCALE? → Book a discovery call (from the Featured Section)
OR
→ DM me “𝐄𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐘𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐌” and let’s turn your expertise into consistent, scalable results.

Dhruv Parmar

A founder making ₹40 lakh a year told me he writes his own LinkedIn posts.

And he spends 4 hours a week on it.

I didn't say a word, but just opened my calculator in front of him.

₹40 lakh a year = ₹3,333 per hour.
4 hours a week = ₹13,332 of his time.

Every single week. That's ₹53,328 a month.

And these are posts that he's not really trained to write.

No conversion strategy. Only decent likes from people who will never buy.

Meanwhile, his calendar has 6 discovery calls he hasn't followed up on.
A ₹2 lakh proposal has been sitting unsent for 11 days.
And a high-ticket programme he hasn't launched because he "doesn't have time."

He doesn't have that time because he spends ₹53,000 worth of time on content every month.

And that's where I showed him the real math.

A done-for-you LinkedIn system: ₹80,000 a month

You get those 16 hours back immediately.

One follow-up call converts.
One proposal goes out.
One client closes.

That's ₹2 lakh in.
Net gain: ₹1.2 lakh.

From the hours he bought back.

He stared at the screen for a long moment. Then said something I didn't expect:

"I knew this. I just didn't want to admit it."

Well, that's not just this founder's problem, but it's a problem of a lot of founders & coaches I talk to.

It's not that they don't understand leverage.

The problem is that they're operating like the version of themselves that had to do everything alone.

Your revenue grew. But your thinking is still stuck.

₹80,000 to free up 16 hours a week isn't a cost. It's the highest-return investment in your business.

Do you still think writing your own content is a smart choice? 

PS - And don't tell me that the content person can't write in your voice, or that you write differently. That's actually bullsh*t, and I've talked about it so many times...

You're NOT unique. Period.

I don’t generate LEADS. I build TRUST for Founders & Coaches with Content + Email Ecosystem | Served 75+ clients in the last 7 years | Building my one-person ghostwriting biz to $10k/month |

Don't hire me if you can't handle my obsession.

I've literally said this on a sales call.

Because I don't just come in as a ghostwriter or email strategist, but I come in as an obsessed freak that wants to know everything about you and your business.

What it looks like working with me:

(And boy, my client was actually shocked and asked, "Wait, you'll do all of this?")

When you hire me, you're not hiring a ghostwriter.

You're actually hiring someone who treats your brand like a business, not a content calendar.

And that's why clients like working with me.

As soon as I onboard a client, here's what I do:

Week 1-2: I become obsessed with your business

My first call with the client is never about LinkedIn. It's about:

→ Your revenue goals
→ Your ideal client (the specific ones you actually want)
→ Your offers (and how they're positioned now vs. how they should be)

I audit your entire brand. Profile. Content. Offers. Funnel.

Then I'll build you a strategy. Not just "post ideas." A full positioning + conversion system.

3rd Week onwards: I run your LinkedIn like it's mine, and you get:

→ 12 posts/month (written in your voice, not AI slop)
→ Strategic engagement (I'm not just commenting "great post!")
→ Monthly performance reviews (what's driving DMs, what's not working)
→ Email funnel optimization (because LinkedIn content without nurture = wasted attention)

And that's not even all...

Every month, we go on a deep dive together, and I show you:

Which posts drove the most DMs (and WHY)
What's happening in your email funnel (statistics)
Where we're pivoting next month

And I'm not just reporting the metrics, but I explain where we can double down to make money.

Plus, the stuff you don't see (but I'm doing):

→ I'm tracking your competitors' content (what's working for them) 
→ I'm testing different CTAs (to see what converts better) 
→ I'm optimizing your profile every month (based on what's shifting in the algorithm) 

So, you're not hiring a ghostwriter.
You're hiring a CMO for your personal brand.

And that's the difference between a $300/month and a $1200/month ghostwriter!

You choose your growth engine.

Want to get a sneak peek at what my starting audits for founders look like? DM me "AUDIT"

PS - I'm opening up 2 new slots for March. Want IN? DM me now!

"Why should I worry about LinkedIn?" This investor had 17+ companies, 3 exits, and millions in bank.

I was on a call with him last week.
(and I know how long it took to just make that call happen 😪)

Just 5 minutes in the call, and he asked me this:

"Why should I worry about building a brand on LinkedIn when I have nothing to sell or want any money?"

He has a point, right?

It's true that you don't need money
You don't need to make new sales

But when you show up on LinkedIn, you're actually becoming a guide.

Even your raw stories are an inspiration for people who are still working their way through the ropes.

→ You can post your raw experiences as a founder or investor
→ You can post about WHY you did WHAT you did
→ You can post the latest strategies that you see around

There are literally 100s of things you can talk about, and it's going to build you up for real.

Plus, there are definitely the benefits that roll in:

→ You get invited for speaking gigs & events
→ You get exposed to networks you didn't know existed
→ The right founders see you posting & they pitch to you

So, that's the add-on to give you that adrenaline rush.

Let's be real...

You might not need the money.
But everyone needs that adrenaline rush, right?

This is how you get it.

And that's why I help investors build a solid personal brand to get those opportunities they deserve!

Why do you think an investor should build their personal brand?

PS - How long have you been building your personal brand?

I added this ONE line to my client's LinkedIn posts, and we grew his email list by 200% in 60 days.

"Want the full strategy? DM me."

It was this simple CTA that was leading to a landing page.

We started collecting emails.

Stop treating your LinkedIn and email like a bad blind date.

No chemistry. Awkward pauses.

If you want to make $3-5k services a no-brainer, then you gotta fix this ASAP.

Here’s the fix:

Think of LinkedIn as your stage 
And email as your backstage pass.

↳ On LinkedIn, you’re sparking curiosity and drawing the crowd in
↳ In email, you’re building deeper relationships and closing deals

But if these two aren’t speaking the same language? 
Your audience gets confused, and they bounce.

Here’s an example of how to make them dance together:

→ You write a LinkedIn post:
“Why most email funnels fail before they even start (and how to fix yours).”

→ At the end of the post:
“Want the exact 5-step email strategy I use? DM me for access to my blueprint!”

→ In your email:
You expand on the post: “Here’s what I couldn’t fit into my LinkedIn post…”
You give them extra value and then softly pitch your service.

The magic here?

→ Your LinkedIn content fuels your email list growth
→ Your emails continue the conversation and drive conversions

Start treating them like a power couple, not separate players. 
The results will speak for themselves.

Do you treat LinkedIn & Email as a power couple or 2 strangers? 🤔

PS - Ready to align your LinkedIn and email strategies so they work together seamlessly? DM me, and let’s make it happen.

PPS - Which book are you reading these days, my friends?

They said carousels are DEAD in 2023.
Then they said it again in 2025.
Now it's again in 2026.

Actually, they're dominating harder than ever. And 2026 data backs it up for real.

Carousels achieve a 6.60% engagement rate, which is 278% higher than video, 303% higher than images, and 596% higher than text-only posts. 

I'm not saying that I want a wave of carousels, just like we saw in 2024.

And it definitely doesn't mean that I'm not going to do more text-only posts.

I'm still bullish on text-posts (just like my pal, Ryan Musselman, high-five!!!)

But this data clearly shows that carousels are important as well.

They're increasing the dwell time.

And that 2-3 minutes a reader spends on your post is boosting it like crazy.

The LinkedIn algorithm in 2026 rewards substance over frequency, depth over virality, and expertise over engagement hacking. 

So are you still going to sit on the fence?

What's the last carousel you saved because you actually learned something? 

PS - Tag some creators whose carousels you like the most, coz I want to check out more of them!

Carousels Are DEAD in 2026

I spent 18 hours studying the magnetic founder brands of Ali Abdaal, Sam Altman & Naval Ravikant (breakdown included).

6.1M YouTube subscribers. 
CEO of a $150B company. 
Internet philosopher with a cult-like following. 

All three followed different playbooks.

But they all got crazy results, and we know it.

And based on this breakdown, I came up with a simple PLAYBOOK for founders.

-> Authenticity > Polish
People trust faces more than logos. Your quirks are your moat.

-> Purpose > Product
87% of executives say a strong personal brand helps raise money. Your "why" matters more than your "what."

-> Depth > Volume
One deep essay beats 30 surface-level posts. Stop chasing reach. Start building resonance.

-> Community > Audience
Followers scroll. Communities stay. Build spaces where people feel seen.

-> Ownership > Algorithms
Newsletters, blogs, websites. Platforms change. Assets don't.

LinkedIn changed a lot in 2025.

But the people who placed their bets on email lists are selling like crazy.

Well, I know it, because I helped them build that email list.

This is why my biggest advice to founders is to STOP trying to be everywhere.

They need to know where they can reap the most benefits. The rest is just noise.

Who has been a real inspiration for you?

PS - Shall I do more in-depth breakdowns from now? 🫣

PPS - LinkedIn's limit didn't allow me to add the full breakdown, so I created a doc for it. Comment "BRAND" and I'll send it to you.

Money flows where attention goes. That's the reality for B2B businesses (which they are missing out on)

I have a habit of listening to a podcast while hitting the gym.

And I swear that I love this way of consumption.
Easy 3-4 podcasts consumed every week with audio notes lying in my Keep app.

Last week, I was listening to an interesting marketing podcast between Rajiv Talreja and Raj Shamani.

Rajiv talked about content marketing.

And B2B is missing out on this for real.

I'll say this once (okay, I might say it again tomorrow, lol!!!)

Decision-makers don't buy from you because your product is better. They buy because they've been reading you for 3 months.

There's a simple thing happening behind this.

Your best clients refer you to their peers.
That peer Googles your name.
Finds nothing.
Then Googles the problem.
Finds your competitor's content everywhere.

Now you can take a guess who they're going to call.

Word-of-mouth used to build businesses.

Now it just opens the door.

But when that door opens, the buyer doesn't call you first.

They research.

And if your content isn't part of that research, you've already lost.

Money flows where attention goes.

This is true for every industry and every freaking business.

But I see this being true a lot more for B2B businesses with long sales cycles.

They aren't making impulse buying decisions.

They are reading your posts, articles, newsletters, press releases, and everything that your ambassadors are talking about.

And they make that decision in the 29 pieces of content they consumed before they ever contacted anyone.

Content creation isn't marketing anymore.

It's distribution.

If buyers can't find your perspective when they're researching, you don't get considered.

You just get outcompeted by someone who showed up in their feed.

Whose content is your next client reading right now?

PS - Which company's content marketing strategies always leave you in awe?

The prospect was on the verge of crying on the Zoom call.

This was just from 2 days ago.

And it was once again because of a lie that a digital marketing agency told him.

I'm not gonna defame them.

But they just sold unrealistic dreams to this coach.

We'll post content.
People will start engaging.
And you'll start getting clients like crazy.

Most coaches & founders think the hard part is getting engagement (likes, comments, DMs)

But the real challenge?
→ Turning that engagement into paying clients.

95% of coaches & consultants never ask:

"What happens after someone engages with my content?"

Get this through your head:

→ Engagement ≠ Trust
→ Trust ≠ Purchase
→ And content alone ≠ Conversion

These 3 biggest leaks in your funnel are stealing your leads:

3/ The "Now What?" gap

You see them engaging with your content.
But you're not guiding them to the next step.

👉🏻 Use soft CTAs in posts:
"DM 'System' if you're tired of posting on LinkedIn with no leads."

👉🏻 Automate your follow-ups:
"Loved your comment! Here's a free guide on [their pain point] -> [Link]"

2/ The "Trust Desert"

They visited your profile. 
But they see NO proof that you can help them.

👉🏻 Turn your LinkedIn into a Landing Page:
"I help [ICP] get [result] without [pain point]. Grab my free [lead magnet] -> [Link]"

👉🏻 Pin a case study post:
"How I helped a [Client] get $15k worth of sales in 7 days."

1/ The "Nurture Black Hole"

They signed up for your lead magnet.
But your radio silence isn't going to nurture or convert.

👉🏻 Send a 5-day email sequence that:

• Solve a micro-problem (Day 1)
• Challenge their belief (Day 2)
• Point out their mistakes (Day 3)
• Share a relevant case study (Day 4)
• Present your offer (Day 5)

NOTE: Obviously, this is way more structured for my clients because we do it around ONE point 😂

Leads leak when you assume interest = intent.

But intent only builds when you have a system behind your content that captures → nurtures → converts.

The more I build these for my clients, the more I learn as well.

If your funnel feels like a sieve:

1. Audit where leads drop off (comments? DMs? emails?)
2. Plug the gaps with clear next steps

OR you can just DM me "Funnel" (To avoid watching your prospects slip away)

♻️ Repost if you agree with me!

If you're a founder or CEO, stop treating LinkedIn like a slot machine.

Post. Pull the lever. Hope something lands.

And then they keep blaming the algorithm.

But it's actually a Content-Audience Fit problem.

I know you'd have heard mostly about product-market fit. But content-audience fit is a real thing.

Content-Audience Fit = saying something your audience needs to hear right now.

And you're measuring this fit with the wrong signals.

Impressions = your content appeared on a screen.
Likes = someone spent 0.3 seconds on it.

Neither tells you if it landed.

The real signals:
→ A DM that starts with "I felt seen"
→ A comment that's 3 sentences long and ends with a personal confession
→ A save with no comment (means: I need to come back to this)

And Content-Audience Fit comes down to 3 layers (but most people only think about one)

Layer 1 - Topic Fit

Are you writing about what your audience is obsessing over right now?

Not what you want to teach, but their current frustration.

Go read the last 10 comments your ideal client left on other people's posts. That's your content calendar.

Layer 2 - Stage Fit

This is where most people break down.

Your audience is somewhere in this awareness chain:

Unaware → Problem Aware → Solution Aware → Ready to Buy

But most LinkedIn content lives at "Solution Aware." And the goldmine nobody touches is the "Problem Aware" content.

That's when someone comments: "Wait. This is exactly what I've been feeling."

Layer 3 - Voice Fit

Cover your name on your post. Would your audience still know it was you?

If not, then you don't have Voice Fit yet.

Run this analysis on your last 10 posts:

High impressions, low DMs → Right distribution, wrong stage. You're writing at the wrong level of awareness.

Low impressions, high DMs → Right message, weak hook. The content works, but the entry point doesn't.

High impressions, high DMs → You have fit. Reverse-engineer it immediately.

Low impressions, low DMs → Wrong topic entirely. Move on.

You aren't stuck because of a content problem.
You just don't have audience clarity.

Content-Audience Fit is going to be your diagnosis.

When your content makes someone feel seen — that's fit.
When it makes someone feel understood — that's trust.
When it makes someone DM you — that's a lead.

I always believe that the right 800 people will always outperform the wrong 80,000.

So, which of the 3 layers is your biggest gap — Topic, Stage, or Voice?

PS - Do you ever get those butterflies in your stomach when someone DMs you with that "I felt seen because of your post" DM, or is it just me? 😅

taplio

The Battle

Vedika Bhaia

Dhruv Parmar

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreVedika Bhaia's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreDhruv Parmar's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Vedika Bhaia

Dhruv Parmar

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Vedika Bhaia's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreDhruv Parmar's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreVedika Bhaia's LinkedIn Performance