As an AI Product Growth Leader, I’m on a mission to revolutionize how businesses harness data and AI to drive innovation, accelerate growth, and scale impact. I lead with a strategic vision: to make data collaboration seamless, AI adoption intuitive, and business-centric innovation scalable.

At @DataGOL, I drive growth initiatives that position us as the go-to solution for intelligent business enablement. From BusinessOS to AI Agents and Self-Serve Analytics, I build intelligent experience engines that empower business users—not just data teams—to make faster, smarter decisions.

With 20+ years across enterprise SaaS, data platforms, and AI/ML products, I operate at the intersection of strategy, technology, and customer-centricity. My passion lies in translating complex capabilities into simple, scalable value—whether that’s through a game-changing product, a repeatable growth engine, or a transformative AI initiative.

I don’t chase hype. I build real-world, value-driven solutions that solve real business problems.

🤝 Let’s connect if you’re serious about using AI and data to redefine what’s possible for your business.

Vinod SP

𝗙𝗶𝘅 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲.

A new Head of Data walks in.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝟵𝟬 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁.

Many start with dashboards, pipelines, and plans. They rebuild what’s broken and expect trust to follow.

𝗕𝘂𝘁, 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹.

They forget that trust, not tools, is the real foundation. You can fix every schema and still have leaders asking, “Why are we still in this mess?”

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀:

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟭: 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝗲, 𝗗𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿.

Meet every key person. Ask what data they trust. Listen to real pain, not just reports. Find your “data superusers.” See where data dies before it reaches the decision.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟮: 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻.

Prioritize quick wins. Rank by impact, complexity, reach, and risk. Set clear ownership for metrics. Share updates every week.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟯: 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳, 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀.

Pick the highest priority. Deliver one visible win in 30-45 days. Align on definitions so everyone speaks the same language. Over communicate wins and issues.

𝗔𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗽𝘀:

• Don’t rush to buy new tools.
• Don’t rebuild dashboards before fixing trust.
• Don’t promise AI if you have ten definitions of revenue.

The first 90 days decide if data drives growth or stays a reporting chore.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗙𝗢 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝟵𝟬, 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀.

Trust comes first.

Visible wins come next.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻” 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀?

Building AI Agents that are powerful enough to run your business @DataGOL | Ex-Meta | AI Product Builder | Chief Data & AI officer | Harvard Business School

No alternative text description for this image

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀

I've had the same conversation with 3 different CFOs this month.

They all said some version of this: 

"My finance team just ran their own margin analysis. Without the data team. In 30 seconds."

🔁 𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮. 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁. 𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹.

"𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲" becomes a standard function and the data < >finance wall collapses.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:

The era of descriptive dashboards is ending. AI agents are forcing the shift to diagnostic analytics.

𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲: "Revenue was $2.3M in May"

𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰: "Revenue spiked because Product X drove 47% of new bookings, but COGS increased 23% due to supplier changes"

One tells you the score. The other tells you how to change the game.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴:

→ DataGOL launches a "𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁" that confirms account ranges with CFOs before calculating margins (human-in-the-loop, not black box)

→ Finance teams moving from "what happened" to "why it happened" without writing SQL

→ The "golden layer" (clean, standardized data) becoming the moat not the dashboard itself

𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲:

• 𝗕𝗜 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 → AI-driven diagnostic layers

• 𝗔𝗱-𝗵𝗼𝗰 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 → Conversational agents

• 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝘆𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀 → Real-time variance investigation

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸-𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲.

→ It'll be your diagnostic intelligence layer.

→ The teams that own this conversation will have a seat at the board table.

→ The ones still building dashboards that answer "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁" will keep wondering why no one looks at them.

Are you still answering "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱" while your board wants to know "𝘄𝗵𝘆"?.

Check out DataGOL DataScience Agent in the comment.

𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗜.

It’ll reward the AI that survives the audit: 𝗥𝗢𝗜, 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 inside real teams, real systems, with real guardrails.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 “𝗔𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀” 𝗜 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:
✅ a pilot that generates
❌ a workplace that can’t metabolize the output
So the org gets buried under polished drafts… and nobody’s sure what’s true, what’s safe, or what’s worth acting on.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝟯 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘀

𝗖𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝗽 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 → retire bad routines before AI scales them.

𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 → permissions, monitoring, compliance: non-negotiable.

𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱 → proprietary data + human expertise + intentional creativity.

The “𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲” isn’t less human. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 because:

• Creativity becomes scarce advantage when output is frictionless.

• Human expertise gets pricier when AI sounds confident about everything.

• And if AI smooths away the messy debate, you lose the work trails that keep teams aligned.

If your org gets judged on measurable value in 2026…
𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁: meetings, workflows, reports, approvals or “AI-generated busywork”?

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿: 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗛𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲! 🔥

Ever wonder why it's SO HARD to stick with something new? The answer is simpler than you think! 😊

Visuals by @Pejman Milani

Look at willpower like a candle - it starts strong but eventually burns out. We've all been there... super excited on day 1, kinda tired by day 3, and completely giving up by day 7! 🕯️
But habits? They're like an endless energy source! ⚡
The science is clear:

Willpower runs out (just like your phone battery)
Habits run on autopilot (like breathing!)
Small daily actions > big one-time efforts

What's ONE tiny habit you could start today? Maybe drinking a glass of water when you wake up? Or spending 5 minutes reading before bed?

Remember: Consistency beats intensity! Build those habit flames and watch them power your success! 🚀

hashtag#HabitHacks

𝟭𝟭 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝘆 𝗝𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 🚀

Ever wonder why some leaders effortlessly inspire while others struggle despite the fancy title?

Visuals from @Pejman Milani

I've distilled my leadership journey into 11 visual frameworks that changed my approach. (#10 was my personal game-changer!)

Three Core Leadership Principles:
✅ Today's hard choices create tomorrow's success
✅ Authority comes from action, not position
✅ Clear thinking creates clear direction

𝗠𝘆 𝟭𝟭 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗱:
1️⃣ 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿
Leadership is earned daily through consistent actions that build trust, not handed out with business cards.
2️⃣ 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝘃𝗮𝗴𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿
Put thoughts on paper and watch how quickly the gaps appear! Clear documentation transforms good thinking into great execution.
3️⃣ 𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴
Great teams aren't born—they're methodically built through consistent effort.
4️⃣ 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲
Transform failures into frameworks for future success through systematic learning.
5️⃣ 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲. 𝗘𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲
The courage to make difficult choices today prevents bigger crises tomorrow.
6️⃣ 𝗙𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆
Action is the antidote to anxiety. Start before you feel ready—momentum creates clarity.
7️⃣ 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺
Yesterday's perfect solution needs today's fresh perspective.
8️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀
Progress rarely follows a neat path. Small, sustainable steps consistently taken beat sporadic giant leaps.
9️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘁
Today's effort prevents tomorrow's pain. Disciplined processes create freedom, not restriction.
🔟 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴
Focus beats fragmentation. Choosing what to ignore is as strategic as choosing what to pursue.
1️⃣1️⃣ 𝗔 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆
Vision without action is just daydreaming. Your example speaks louder than any mission statement.

Which framework resonates most with your current challenges? I'd love to hear which one hits closest to home!
♻️ Repost this to help your network level up their leadership toolkit!

carousel.pdf

𝟭𝟬 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲

We are done playing with AI.

In 2026, AI agents enter work. Quiet. Deep. For real. 

I see 10 big shifts coming for enterprise and mid-market teams.

Here is my view:

1️⃣ 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸
Not chatbots.
They read, write, click, move data, trigger flows.
They act in tools you use now.
Your team starts to manage agents, not chats.

2️⃣ 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀
No more “cool demo” with no owner.
CFO asks one question:
→ Where is ROI in 90 days?
If you show value, you scale.
If not, budget dies. Fast.

3️⃣ 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁-𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆
Agents fail if data is messy.
You need data that is:
→ Easy to find
→ Clean and linked
→ Safe for wide access
I call this “business-ready data”.

4️⃣ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿
You do not want 15 data tools.
You want one brain.
One place for:
→ Pipelines
→ Store
→ Metrics
AI-native platforms win here.

5️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄
Engineers write less raw code.
Agents draft flows and tests.
Your best people:
→ Set clear specs
→ Review diffs
→ Guard quality at scale

6️⃣ 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹
Regulators wake up.
You must show:
→ Who touched what data
→ How AI made each call
→ Why output is safe
No proof, no trust.

7️⃣ 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁𝘀
Per seat makes no sense when agents do work.
Expect:
→ Pay per outcome
→ Pay per use
→ Mix of both for large deals

8️⃣ 𝗠𝗶𝗱-𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗺𝗽𝘀 𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱
Less tech debt.
Faster change.
Strong AI-native tools mean a small firm with clear data beats a slow giant with old stacks. 🚀

9️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘃𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝘆 𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀
Home-grown AI infra looks cool.
Cost, talent, and risk say no.
You still build use cases.
You buy the boring layers.

🔟 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁
Big press drops fade.
Real edge comes from:
→ One agent that cuts 30% cycle time
→ One workflow with clean, shared data
No noise. Only impact.

I spend my days at @DataGOL on one question:
𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝗜 “𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆” 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀?

What part of this future feels closest to your world right now?

𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘂𝗽, 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗢𝗦 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁!

AI is making execution simple, which means good judgment is your new superpower.
Stop competing on speed and start building an 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗣𝗠 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺.

I will be writing the detailed series over the following week.

My 5-part series is your blueprint for this shift:
𝗘𝗺𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁: Your new moat is not in features, it's in turning chaos into clear decisions and defining high-integrity constraints.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗-𝗔-𝗘 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸: Use the Delegate, Amplify, Elevate model. Give all the repeatable tasks to AI and focus human energy on irreversible decisions.

𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 & 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴: Get better at interpreting data (Signal) and naming the real problem (Sensemaking). Always look for "𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲."

𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆: When you build AI, you are shipping a system, not just a feature. Govern it with a clear Decision Contract.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗠𝗼𝗮𝘁: Your value is defined by four things: providing Clarity, making Evaluation the new UX, designing for Trust, and running the Machine-Human system.

The winners won’t be the ones who “move fast.”
They’ll be the ones who decide well—𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀.

𝗜𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱… 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗱 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲?

📉 𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝘃𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀.


You optimized your pipelines, warehouses, and data stack.
You invested in Snowflake, Databricks, dbt, and orchestration tools.
You assumed that would make AI work in real business workflows.

𝗜𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁.

Because AI doesn’t fail from lack of data. It fails from lack of context.

𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿, 𝘄𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵:

• Why “data access” ≠ “operational understanding”
• How missing context erodes trustand destroys adoption
• What it really takes to move from dashboards to autonomous agents that explain, verify, and act
• Why current stacks optimize for storage and compute—not decision quality

🚫 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲.
✅ Start embedding business context into the foundation of your data systems.

If your AI can’t reason through a workflow like your top analyst, then all you’ve built is a very expensive tool.

https://lnkd.in/gnNP5JXJ

Product + Growth @ DataGol | AI | Financial Transformation | Defi

Thank you to everyone who joined us yesterday. If you missed the session, or are based in Europe, we will be hosting it again next week for our European partners.

Most AI projects do not fail because the models are weak.
They fail because the teams are focusing on infrastructure plumbing and get stuck with optimizing the infra. 

In our recent DataGOL webinar, we broke down a pattern we keep seeing:
Teams invest heavily in pipelines, warehouses, and data stack optimization.
Then they expect AI to reason, explain, and act inside real workflows.

It cannot.
So trust erodes.
Answers get discarded.
Momentum stalls.

We covered:

How missing business context destroys trust in AI outputs

The difference between “data access” and “operational understanding”

What it actually takes to move from dashboards to agents that can explain, verify, and take action

Why Snowflake/Databricks-style stacks optimize storage and compute, but not decision quality

The shift is simple to describe, but hard to execute:
Stop building more AI infrastructure.

Start building a #ConextOS that understands the business.
Reach out to us for 1:1 AI consulting session.

#AIinProduction #EnterpriseAI #DataPlatforms #AIInfrastructure #AgenticAI #DataGOL #OperationalIntelligence

Focus on AI Outcomes, Not Infrastructure

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿.

You add “AI on top” of a broken stack.

I see this again and again when I talk with B2B founders and operators.

- The story is always the same.
- The product helps clients save time.
- The team still drowns in manual work.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵.
His SaaS app cuts 80–90% of founder time in fundraising.
- Strong value.
- Happy users.

𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺, 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:
• Call transcripts land in the CRM
• Team members read each call
• They pull out fund mandate, stage, check size
• They paste data into fields, one by one
• Boards in Asana do not move unless someone drags cards.
• Research for each investor runs “one by one by one” because bulk tools hallucinate.

𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿.
- The service scales.
- The engine does not.
- The answer for him was not a “new all-in-one platform.”
- He needed one intelligent system between all his tools.
That is where we brought in @DataGOL as "AI Native Intelligence & Execution Platform"

Here is how we implemented it:

→ 𝗘𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿
- Transcripts go in.
- AI pulls structured fields with a shared language.
- Data flows back into the CRM without a human hand.

→ 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗿
- CRM actions trigger status changes.
- Project tools move on their own.
- No one drags cards all day.

→ 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲
• Multi-agent AI runs deep research in bulk.
• Scores and ranks targets.
• Shows sources so you can trust the results.

→ 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
- Once the middleware works well, you replace old tools
- One by one
- With less risk and clear ROI proof.

Fast ROI comes from one AI Native layer that makes your whole stack work like one product.

DataGOL

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗹𝗲: 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟'𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁

There's a shift happening in how SaaS based finance teams interact with their data.
I'm calling it 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲.

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸: AI that doesn't just tell you what happened, but identifies exactly why it happened. In seconds.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲:
𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 = "Revenue down 12%. Margins compressed."
𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 = "May COGS spike in Product Line X. Drove 73% of the margin erosion."
One reports the score. The other finds the insights that lost the game.

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱.
They want to know why Q2 margins spiked while Q3 collapsed.
And right now?
Your data team finds out what was presented... after the meeting.

𝗜'𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀.
CFO builds the board deck. The data team scrambles to reverse-engineer the "why" question two weeks later.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀:
→ Hire expensive consultants for ad-hoc analyses ($50k+ per engagement)
→ Duct-tape BI tools that still need manual SQL and weeks of turnaround
Neither gets you diagnostic depth in real-time.

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟'𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄.
Here's what happens now:
✓ 𝗔𝘀𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵: "What drove the margin variance in Q3?"
✓ 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘀 your Chart of Accounts before calculating (human-in-the-loop)
✓ 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀—product line, customer segment, cost category
✓ Suggests the 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 before you ask it
✓ 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸—Python code, logic trail, audit-ready transparency

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀:
→ From raw NetSuite chaos → boardroom-ready insight in under 60 seconds.
→ Full transparency into how every number was calculated.
→ No more "black box" AI guessing.

𝗡𝗼 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱. 𝗡𝗼 𝗦𝗤𝗟. 𝗡𝗼 𝗽𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆.𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝗸.
Diagnostic Finance isn't about prettier dashboards.
𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 "𝘄𝗵𝘆" 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀.

Are you still reporting what happened? Or are you ready to diagnose why?

DataGOL

𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧 stands out as it delivers real time business ready insights directly embedded into your finance, sales, product workflows.

It's deeply integrated, maintains context across your data, proactive and action oriented, solving the "𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮" problem and driving decisions.

𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗪𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗢𝗡, 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗫𝗧 𝗔𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗘, 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗙𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗗 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗡𝗘𝗥

𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦!!

T𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧 - Assisting your Finance, Product and Sales Team. 𝗔𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 - Responding within minutes with insights that were not possible before.

Whether you are analyzing revenue trends, sales or.. etc..

𝗦𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝘁 - directly creating and accessing data pipelines, managing context and creating intelligence from your data.

Want a personalized 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗟 Comment below.

#DataScience #Transparency #TrustInAI #DataGOL

𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀. 𝟴𝘅 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴.
We looked at a “successful” gaming platform: 10M active free-to-play users, super sticky… and still stuck at ~8x exit.

I saw this in a gaming client at @DataGOL
- Free-to-play.
- Very sticky.
- Exit stuck at 8x.

𝗪𝗵𝘆?
User data looked nice on a slide.
Inside, they had HTML + vibes.
- No real events.
- No cohorts.
- No path from “player” to “payer”.

𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗗𝗔𝗨, 𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴.

The truth is:
- You don’t scale from 8x to 20x with more features.
- You scale with a better brain.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄:

𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 + 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁.
- One lake for all data.
- One “virtual CRM” on top.
- One clean stream of events from product and ads.
Then I stop saying “users”.
I see segments, with clear intent.

𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁, 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸𝘀.
- Every campaign message flows into the same brain.
- Every deposit and payment links back to a touch.
- I can ask “what creates LTV?” and get a clear view.
Most tools stop here.
They show reports, not answers.

𝗟𝗮𝘀𝘁, 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀.
- Small Python agents watch each player.
- They look at recency, frequency, and value.
- They trigger one next action, not ten.
Email, offer, KYC nudge, in-game push.
Personal, fast, cheap.

𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁:
- Lower cost to reactivate.
- Less waste in marketing.
- More users move to deposit, subscribe, or compete.

Teams say “we have a monetization issue”.
I see an intelligence gap.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲?

If you want to build that intelligence for your product, @DataGOL helps teams build the full stack AI agents.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀?

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗠 𝗠𝗼𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗖𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲

There's a role emerging in AI-native companies that doesn't have a name yet.
It's the "Judgment PM".

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲:
𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗠 = Discovery → prioritization → requirements → delivery → iterate
𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗠 = Turns ambiguity into irreversible decisions that machines can't make

𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁.
Ship faster. Write more PRDs. Run more sprints.
That era is over.
In an AI-native world, execution speed is no longer scarce.
Judgment is. Context is. Trust is.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄, most product teams are responding the wrong way.
More gates. More committees. More process.
That's not a strategy. That's organizational scar tissue.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗠 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆:
✓ 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 — turns chaos into a sharp decision: "We're doing X, not Y, because Z"
✓ 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 — treats eval as a first-class product capability ("Evaluation is the new UX")
✓ 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 — ships explanations, confidence scores, and undo/rollback as core features

𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁.
✓ Your operating model must increase the surface area of what can be validated.
✓ The PMs who figure this out will own the decisions that matter.
✓ The ones who don't will keep writing PRDs that machines could generate in 30 seconds.

Comment if you're already making this shift?

DataGOL = 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗿 + 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺

I've had the same conversation with 5 different performance marketing teams this Month.

They all said some version of:
"𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝘆 𝗖M𝗢 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵. 𝗜 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺."
This isn't a data quality problem. It's a trust problem.
And it's driving a shift from "𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸-𝗕𝗼𝘅 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀" to what I'm calling "𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀".

Here's the difference:
𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸-𝗕𝗼𝘅 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 = Dashboards you can't trace. Numbers you can't validate. Feature requests for every custom query.
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 = Full visibility into SQL structure. Complete data lineage. Slice data any way you need, instantly.

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗖𝗔𝗖 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝟮𝟬%.
- You pull the dashboard. The number's there.
- But you can't explain how it was calculated. You can't trace it back to the source.
You're defending a number you don't fully understand.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀:
→ Accept the black box (and the trust gap)
→ Build custom solutions (and burn budget on data engineers instead of User Acquisition )
We built DataGOL "Data Science Agent" to eliminate that trade-off.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄:
✓ 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗦𝗤𝗟 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆—trace any metric to source in seconds
✓ 𝗦𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀—no feature requests
✓ 𝗔𝗜-𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀 (imagine Looker with ChatGPT built in) - AI and agent capabilities directly into the workflow
✓ 𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - to understand nuanced user behaviour

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁? Budget that used to fund data validation now goes directly into user acquisition.

The teams that figure this out will outspend competitors where it matters.

Are you still working with black-box tools? Or have you made the shift to trust-first?

#DataScience #Transparency #DataAnalytics #TrustInAI #DataGOL

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝟱𝟲% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗘𝗢𝘀 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗡𝗼 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀

𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄.
Leadership thinks the infrastructure is in place.
Employees say it isn't even close.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴.
81% of the C-suite believe a clear AI policy exists in their organization.
Only 28% of employees agree.
That's a 53-point perception gap.

𝗢𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝟴𝟭% 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗜.
Only 27% of individual contributors say the same.
On tool access? 80% vs. 32%.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴...
This isn't a communication problem. It's a feedback loop failure.
If leadership believes the foundation is already built, they remain blind to the bottlenecks preventing teams from moving beyond basic prompting.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀.
Workday found that 37% of AI time savings are immediately lost to rework, employees cleaning up outputs that weren't good enough the first time.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲.
Meanwhile, PWC data shows 56% of CEOs report no significant financial return from AI.
But 12%—the "Vanguard"—are seeing simultaneous cost and revenue gains.
The difference? They're 2.6x more likely to have embedded AI into core processes, not peripheral tasks.

𝗠𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻:
- The AI winners of 2026 won't have better models.
- They'll have closed the 53-point gap between what the boardroom believes and what the frontline experiences.
- The technology is not the bottleneck.
- The misalignment is.
𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? 𝗢𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁?

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗘𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗣𝘂𝘁𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹

I keep hearing the same thing from performance marketers this month:
"𝗜 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗽𝘂𝘁𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺."

Here's the interesting part: 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗔𝗜.
𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
The next analytics battleground isn't AI vs. no-AI.
It's transparent AI vs. blackbox AI.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜'𝗺 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵:
→ AI tools bolted on afterward (no visibility into logic, no context and no data governance)
→ BI tools for dashboards (rigid, predefined models)
→ Custom data teams for flexibility (expensive)


𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵:
→ Decision Traces, ContextOS, Reasoning, and data infrastructure in one layer
→ Custom cohort analysis without engineering tickets
→ SQL visible behind every insight
Tools like @DataGOL are leaning into this, their positioning is essentially
"BI 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘁, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜."

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁:
→ Performance teams are done choosing between speed and trust.
→ They want to ask natural-language questions and see the query logic.
→ They want AI-generated insights and the ability to check its homework.

𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸, 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘄:
✓ Can you cohort by custom events, not just default metrics?
✓ Can you see the underlying SQL structure?
✓ Can you trust insights without a data team translating?

The teams that solve this will move faster and spend less on internal data infrastructure.
The ones that don't will keep paying the "talent tax" just to get answers they're not sure they believe.

Are you already seeing this convergence in your stack? Or are AI and transparency still living in separate tools?

#DataScience #Transparency #DataAnalytics #TrustInAI #DataGOL

As Chief Executive Officer of Integrity Advocate, I lead with a mission-driven approach to integrity, innovation, and impact ensuring that technology empowers compliance, fairness, and trust across industries. With a foundation in business operations leadership and hyper-growth strategy, I bring a proven track record of scaling organizations, optimizing performance, and fostering partnerships that create sustainable value.

Throughout my career, I’ve been recognized for transforming operational frameworks, driving exponential revenue growth, and building global teams that deliver excellence at scale. My leadership is rooted in transparency, continuous improvement, and empowering people from customers to employees to achieve exceptional outcomes.

As a Board Member and Executive Leader, I leverage governance insight and strategic foresight to align corporate vision with measurable performance and cultural integrity. I thrive at the intersection of strategy, technology, and human behavior, ensuring that companies not only grow fast, but grow right.

Key Highlights Include:

✅ Champion hyper-growth, overseeing daily operations and decision-making to accelerate ARR by 1103%, from $2M to $20M within 2 years, and moving the company from #236 to #103 on the Inc. 5000 list

✅ Drove scalability during the COVID-19 Pandemic, initiating an international sector of the company to expand human capital from 15 to 250 employees within 3 months and rapidly increase revenue

✅ Single-handedly landed the inaugural contract in the new corporate proctoring market with Google and formed partnerships, and conducted negotiations with prestigious clients, including Meta (formerly Facebook), yielding G2M success

✅ Oversaw 24/7 global operations, managing employees across 8 countries and 8 industry-leading functions, including Global Customer Success, Global Customer Care Level I and II, Professional Services, Education, Training, Implementation, and Technical Integration

✅ Revitalized renewal process, implemented at-risk process, and leveraged executive sponsorship on strategic accounts to attain a 5% increase in the renewal rate (90% to 95%)

Connect with me if you’re passionate about ethical innovation, scalable business growth, and building cultures rooted in integrity.

Brandon Smith

What Happens When Integrity Is Handled Locally

Decentralized integrity sounds empowering.

In practice, it creates uneven risk.

When integrity decisions are left to individual programs, instructors, or departments:
-standards drift
-expectations vary
-and outcomes stop meaning the same thing

No one intends for this to happen.

But without centralized controls, consistency becomes optional.

Some assessments are tightly secured.
Others rely on judgment.
Most sit somewhere in between.

From the outside, those differences are invisible.

Until trust is questioned.

In compliance-driven environments, inconsistency is indefensible.

Not because people acted in bad faith.
But because the system allowed standards to fragment.

Institutions that protect credibility don’t rely on local interpretation alone.

They define integrity centrally and support it consistently across every assessment that matters.

#AcademicIntegrity #AssessmentSecurity #Credentialing #Compliance #RiskManagement #TrustByDesign #HigherEducationLeadership #IntegrityMatters

Brandon A. Smith

Chief Executive Officer | Investor | Board Member | Advisor | EdTech

The way exams are protected today won’t hold up for much longer. AI tools are getting smarter, test-taker expectations around privacy are higher, and “lock everything down” proctoring just isn’t realistic anymore.

The real question is: what does a smart, defensible assessment security plan look like going forward?

A few things we’re seeing matter most:
• Matching security to the actual risk of the exam (not every test needs the same controls)
• Protecting integrity without over-surveilling learners
• Using AI to flag concerns, but keeping humans in the loop for real decisions
• Having review processes you can confidently stand behind when challenges come up

Assessment security isn’t a single tool or setting. It’s a strategy and it needs to evolve.

If you’re starting to think ahead, this is worth a read:

https://lnkd.in/gHupjUs2

#AssessmentSecurity #OnlineProctoring #EdTech #IntegrityAdvocate

Open article: What’s Your Assessment Security Plan for 2026? by integrityadvocate.com

What’s Your Assessment Security Plan for 2026?

Excited to see Integrity Advocate recognized as a Great Place To Work® Canada for 2026.

This recognition reflects the culture our people have built together — one rooted in trust, care, and integrity. Huge appreciation for #TheAdvocates who bring that mindset to work every day.

Proud of this team and what we’re building. 💚

#GreatPlaceToWork #GPTWCanada #WeAreIA #IntegrityAdvocate #HumanFirst

We’re excited to share that Integrity Advocate is officially Great Place To Work® Canada for 2026 🎉

This recognition is especially meaningful because it’s based on employee feedback, and reflects the trust, care, and collaboration our team brings to work every day.

We’re grateful for a team that believes in doing the right thing, supporting one another, and building technology that protects integrity without losing sight of the human experience.

Thank you to our people for making Integrity Advocate a truly great place to work. 💚

#GreatPlaceToWork #GPTWCanada #TeamCulture #PeoplePowered #WeAreIA #TheAdvocates #IntegrityAdvocate #HumanFirst

When Integrity Is Measured by Outcomes Alone

Outcomes are important.

But they aren’t evidence of integrity.

Many organizations judge assessment quality by results:
-pass rates
-completion numbers
-credential volume

On their own, those signals are incomplete.

Strong outcomes can come from:
-good design
-effective instruction
-or weak controls

Without visibility into how assessments were completed, results lose context.

That’s where risk hides.

When integrity is inferred instead of verified:
-questions can’t be answered later
-decisions become harder to defend
-and confidence rests on assumption

In high-stakes environments, outcomes without controls aren’t reassurance.

They’re exposure.

Institutions that protect credibility don’t rely on results alone.

They ensure outcomes are supported by processes that make integrity provable—not just assumed.

#AcademicIntegrity #AssessmentSecurity #Credentialing #Compliance #RiskManagement #TrustByDesign #HigherEducationLeadership #IntegrityMatters

What excites me most is the team behind these systems. Our team, #TheAdvocates, puts so much care, thoughtfulness, and integrity into this work every day, and that directly shapes the impact we have for our clients and exam-takers.

Grateful for each one of #TheAdvocates, and energized by the opportunity ahead. Big year in front of us 🚀

✨ New Year. Stronger Systems. Trusted Outcomes. ✨

“You do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems.” That insight from James Clear feels especially relevant as we step into the new year.

At Integrity Advocate, everything we do is about building systems that put our clients first. We’ve been hard at work to ensure that as your programs grow, we’re right there with you, making everything smooth, reliable, and focused on your needs.

Going into the new year, we’ve strengthened our foundations to ensure we provide:

💚 Relationships with our clients built on trust and transparency.
🔒 Privacy-first practices that put exam-taker privacy and your credibility at the forefront.
👍 Seamless, easy-to-use experiences that reduce anxiety and support burden.
🤝 Visionary new partnerships and collaborations that pave the way for even stronger assessment protection and validity.
📶 Leadership in AI-driven cheating detection and ongoing guidance as the assessment landscape changes.
🚀 Scalability to support your program’s growth without any hassle.

This year is about building the right systems and relationships to serve you better, so we can achieve even bigger goals together.

Here’s to a year of confidence, clarity, and integrity, focused entirely on you.

#IntegrityAdvocate #OnlineAssessment #ExamIntegrity #ClientFocus #WeAreIA

Why Better Data Hasn’t Led to Better Decisions

Higher education has more data than ever.

Dashboards.
Analytics.
Reporting layers.

And yet, decision-making hasn’t improved at the same pace.

The issue isn’t access to data.

It’s interpretation.

Data fails when:
-metrics aren’t tied to clear outcomes
-context is missing
-signals are treated as conclusions

In those cases, more data just creates more confidence—without more clarity.

Good decisions don’t come from volume.

They come from alignment:
-data connected to standards
-measurements tied to purpose
-insight that explains why, not just what

Without that alignment, analytics become decorative.

They look sophisticated.
They feel reassuring.
But they don’t actually reduce risk or improve outcomes.

The institutions that will benefit most from data aren’t the ones collecting the most of it.

They’re the ones disciplined enough to ask what it’s actually telling them—and what it isn’t.

#EdTech #HigherEducation #LearningAnalytics #AssessmentStrategy #SystemsThinking #AcademicIntegrity #DecisionMaking #TrustByDesign

The Problem With “Good Enough” Integrity

“Good enough” works—until it doesn’t.

Many assessment systems aren’t broken.
They’re just minimally sufficient.

They function when:
-risk is low
-volume is manageable
-scrutiny is limited

That’s precisely why they’re dangerous.

Good enough integrity creates false confidence.
It makes leaders believe controls exist when, in reality, they’re conditional.

When pressure increases:
-assumptions get tested
-gaps widen
-questions surface faster than answers

And systems designed for convenience struggle to respond.

In regulated and high-stakes environments, adequacy isn’t protection.

Defensibility is.

Institutions that take integrity seriously don’t aim for systems that usually work.

They design systems that still hold when conditions change—because eventually, they always do.

#AcademicIntegrity #AssessmentSecurity #Credentialing #Compliance #RiskManagement #TrustByDesign #HigherEducationLeadership #IntegrityMatters

Delaying this decision is a bet that no one asks hard questions.

Leaders with buying power own that risk.
If you are the decision-maker, are you willing to roll the dice?

If proctoring is optional, standards are optional.

You can’t claim equivalent outcomes across certifications, schools, or programs while allowing unequal controls.

That’s not innovation; it’s exposure. An exposure not all insurance companies are willing to overlook when involving serious injury or death. 

Stop waiting for regulations to force your hand.

Lead with integrity!

The Risk of Treating Proctoring as Optional

Optional controls don’t stay optional.

They become inconsistent.

When proctoring is treated as a “nice to have,” outcomes start to depend on context instead of standards.

It creates environments where:
-some assessments are secure
-others rely on trust
-and leaders assume equivalence where none exists

That inconsistency is where risk lives.

Not because everyone cheats.
But because standards stop meaning the same thing across programs, cohorts, or credentials.

In high-stakes environments, inconsistency is exposure.

It weakens defensibility.
It complicates compliance.
And it quietly erodes trust with employers, regulators, and stakeholders.

Institutions that take integrity seriously don’t ask whether controls are convenient.

They ask whether outcomes are defensible.

And they design assessment systems accordingly.

#AcademicIntegrity #AssessmentSecurity #Credentialing #Compliance #RiskManagement #TrustByDesign #HigherEducationLeadership #IntegrityMatters

I laughed at this one,  but here is my real thought on it. 

It’s funny how easy it is to blame bad luck, missed chances, or “that one thing we didn’t do.” But most of the time, progress comes down to perspective.

Going into 2026, choose an outlook that supports growth.

Focus on what’s working.
Let go of what’s not.
Adapt when things change.

Momentum follows mindset.

#Mindset #Leadership #PersonalGrowth
#Adaptability #ProfessionalDevelopment #NewYearMindset

Where Trust Quietly Breaks

Most trust doesn’t fail loudly.

It fades.

It erodes when assumptions go untested.
When controls are relaxed “just this once.”
When no one is explicitly responsible for saying no.

Nothing looks wrong in the moment.

Outcomes still look acceptable.
Processes still function.
Questions still feel unnecessary.

That’s what makes this kind of failure hard to detect.

Trust rarely breaks because of a single bad decision.
It breaks because small compromises accumulate without being named.

And by the time someone asks whether trust still holds, the answer depends on memory instead of evidence.

Strong organizations don’t wait for visible failure.

They pay attention to the quiet places where trust weakens long before it disappears.

#Leadership #Integrity #Trust #RiskManagement #DecisionMaking #StandardsMatter #LongTermThinking

taplio

The Battle

Vinod SP

Brandon Smith

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreVinod SP's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreBrandon Smith's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Vinod SP

Brandon Smith

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Vinod SP's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreBrandon Smith's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreVinod SP's LinkedIn Performance