Amir Tabch

Amir Tabch is an experienced fintech CEO and board leader with deep expertise in regulatory compliance, enterprise transformation, and business growth across financial services and digital asset sectors. He has built and scaled regulated businesses, developed innovative financial products, and led high-performing teams.

Amir holds multiple approvals from the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) in the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) as a Senior Executive Officer (SEO), Licensed Director, and Chairman of the Board, highlighting his multi-category expertise in DeFi brokerage and virtual asset custody. His leadership extends to the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), where he established regulated businesses and contributed to its inaugural licensing cohort.

Throughout his career, Amir has navigated complex regulatory landscapes, forging trusted relationships with FSRA, VARA, the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE), the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA), and the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre Authority (DMCCA). He has achieved multi-jurisdictional success, driving innovation and scaling businesses in highly regulated environments.

Amir has driven digital transformation in fintech and financial services, leading regional "firsts" for employers that fueled significant business growth: 

• At FAB, he revolutionized portfolio and order execution management (PMS/OEMS) by deploying advanced systems with data analytics, real-time processing, and automated workflows, enhancing operational efficiency. 

• At EIB, Amir pioneered WealthTech and algorithmic trading platforms, leveraging machine learning and AI-driven analytics to transform trading strategies and wealth management, providing cutting-edge tools for portfolio optimization and risk management. 

• At Securrency and Copper Securities, he introduced blockchain into brokerage services, establishing the region’s first institutional-grade, blockchain-based brokerage system that elevated security, transparency, and operational integrity. 

• At Liminal, Amir developed a regulated digital asset custody platform utilizing advanced encryption, multi-signature wallets, and API-driven infrastructures, ensuring top-tier digital asset security and regulatory compliance.

As a board leader and advisor, Amir provides strategic oversight and governance to fintech firms and financial institutions, guiding them through growth, compliance, and transformation. He is passionate about advancing financial technology and creating scalable solutions that address the evolving needs of global markets.

Non-Executive, Advisory and Board Experience

► Securrency Capital, Chair of the Board of Directors (COB), 2021 – Present
Securrency Capital (SC) is a regulated institutional DeFi brokerage firm that offers both traditional & digital financial services. SC’s mission is to deliver asset tokenization benefits to retail & institutional clients by providing access to multiple digital products & asset classes through a single, easily accessible marketplace. SC provides a comprehensive digital lifecycle experience for its clients, including asset issuance, share registry maintenance, & corporate actions on the chain, as well as facilitating the purchase & sale of digital & traditional assets & securities.

► Accredited as a Distinguished Non-Executive Director by GetNED, 2022 – Present 
https://get-ned.com/members/amir_tabch/

► SC Meta-Markets, Lead Director, 2022 – Present
SC Meta-Markets is an NFTs E-Marketplace Provider, engaged in providing an online platform for the buying & selling of third parties’ unique digital assets (NFTs) & facilitating commercial interactions between buyers & sellers.

► Nerve Solutions, Board Advisor, 2020 – Present
Nerve Solutions is a boutique Fintech & Regtech consulting & development firm, specializing in real-time risk management & automated trading products for financial markets

► SkillSay, Board Advisor, 2020 – Present
SkillSay is a crowdsourced platform that connects ambitious people to their dream jobs through Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered matching, upskilling & assessments.

► Tadawul Academy, Board Advisor, 2019 – Present
Tadawul Academy is the highest-rated Bilingual CISI training academy in the world

► ZAG Financial Technologies, Advisory Board Chair, 2016 – Present
ZagTrader is a leading global technology company specializing in trading & investment solutions for the financial industry.

► SK Advisory, Board Advisor, 2016 – Present
SK Advisory is a global innovative management & technology consulting company.

🎯 There can be no space between what you want & what you’re willing to do

Every leadership failure starts with a gap.

Not a strategy gap.
Not a talent gap.
A willingness gap.

Leaders say they want speed.
But avoid decisions.

They say they want accountability.
But tolerate ambiguity.

They say they want excellence.
But protect comfort.

That space, the distance between aspiration & action, is where execution goes to die.

💰 Desire is cheap, behavior is expensive

Behavioral science has a term for this, the intention–action gap.

Research in organizational psychology reveals that most leaders genuinely believe they are committed to outcomes, until commitment requires discomfort, reputation risk, or personal inconvenience.

In other words, we want the result, just not the price.

Wanting growth without conflict is not leadership.
Wanting trust without transparency is not leadership.
Wanting speed without decisiveness is fantasy football.

🧠 The brain avoids cost, not failure

Neuroscience gives us an uncomfortable truth.

The human brain does not avoid failure.
It avoids loss of status, certainty, & control.

That is why leaders delay hard conversations.
That is why decisions get deferred to committees.
That is why strategy decks grow while momentum shrinks.

The mind reframes avoidance as prudence.

“Let’s wait for more data.”
“Let’s align stakeholders.”
“Let’s revisit next quarter.”

None of those are wrong.
They are just often disguises.

🧭 Strategy breaks where courage ends

Every strategy has an invisible clause.

“This only works if you are willing to act differently.”

Execution is not blocked by complexity.
It is blocked by hesitation.

High-performing organizations are not braver because they know more.
They are braver because there is no daylight between intent & action.

When they say, “we will prioritize,” something gets de-prioritized.
When they say, “we will hold the line,” someone feels discomfort.
When they say, “this stops now,” it actually stops.

No footnotes. No soft landings.

🔍 Leadership is the collapse of distance

Real leadership collapses the distance between:

What you tolerate & what you claim to value.
What you promise & what you personally absorb.
What you say is urgent & what you act on today.

If you want trust, you must speak first.
If you want speed, you must decide sooner than feels safe.
If you want standards, you must enforce them when it is awkward.

Anything else is branding.

✅ A simple test

Ask yourself one question & answer it honestly.

“If nothing changed except my own behavior, would the outcome still happen?”

If the answer is no, the gap is yours.

Not the team’s.
Not the market’s.
Not the timing’s.

Leadership begins when desire turns into cost, & you pay it without complaint.

Because the moment there is space between what you want & what you are willing to do, that space fills itself.

With excuses.
With drift.
With regret.

& none of those execute strategy.

#Leadership #Management

Amir is a financial markets, wealth management, & brokerage CEO with a track record of growing technology-driven businesses, driving WealthTech projects for financial institutions, & leading high-performing teams.

Amir is currently the CEO — or Chief “Execution” Officer, as he likes to call it — of a technology-enabled financial logistics brokerage that leverages Blockchain technology to provide alternatives to existing service providers & market structures.

It’s no coincidence that Amir ended up working for a progressive company using Blockchain to transform global financial markets. Many of the characteristics of Blockchain mirror Amir’s own personal values, including truth & trust, transparency & security, & certainty & efficiency.

Amir is commonly referred to as the curious & tireless glue that holds his team & clients' projects together, & he is a staunch believer that we are stronger together. He takes pleasure in his ability to communicate clearly & openly, as well as his discipline & execution.

Amir has served at the executive & board levels for the previous two decades & has a strong track record as a team builder. Amir has also been instrumental in the successful launch of asset management platforms & trading systems, in the negotiation of deals with FinTechs, & in the development of businesses from the bottom up.

Charts, trends, & patterns are Amir’s passions. He can look at a chart & instinctively know which direction it is trending in.
He doesn’t see complexity.
He sees certainty.

When Amir’s son was born, his wife was hooked up to a monitor to chart her vital signs. Amir was mesmerized by the figures, the wave patterns, & the screen's highs & lows.
"It looks exactly like a stock!” Amir told her.
"You're not working now!" she said. “Focus on me.”

Amir can’t help it. That’s how his mind works. Financial markets & FinTech have been his passion since his first job in the industry as an intern. Two decades later, Amir still loves what he does, & he’s committed to learning & leadership.

Amir is great with numbers. He’s also good with letters. MS, MCSI, MFTA, MSTA, & CFTe are some of the letters after his name that reflect his dedication to lifelong learning.

Being good with numbers & letters is meaningless unless you have developed the other skills you need to lead a company & a team. You need to be decisive & adaptable, strategic & systematic, just like Amir.

Amir increasingly assumes the role of an organizational architect, developing & harmonizing key elements including strategic direction, structure, core procedures, & talent base.

Chairman & Non-Executive Director | Board Director | CEO & Senior Executive Officer | Regulated Digital Asset Infrastructure Leader | Exchange, Broker-Dealer/OTC, On/Off-Ramps, Custody, Asset Management, & Tokenization

I kept hearing that #Bitcoin “went mainstream”, so I did what any responsible adult does.
I looked at the data instead.

What I found in 2025–2026 was less hype, more spreadsheets.

📊 Spot #Bitcoin ETFs pulled in tens of billions in net inflows in under a year. That’s not retail FOMO. That’s committees, mandates, and monthly rebalancing.

📈 Over 70% of new #BTC exposure now comes via regulated products and custodians, not self-custody wallets. The holders changed, so the market changed.

⚖️ Major financial centers rolled out clearer custody, capital, and disclosure frameworks in 2025. In other words, #Bitcoin became deployable without career risk.

🏦 #Bitcoin correlations are shifting post ETF era. Less meme behavior, more portfolio math. Risk teams are now arguing about drawdowns, not vibes.

🏛️ When policymakers start debating strategic reserves, even hypothetically, the asset has already crossed the line. Ideology exits. Risk management enters.

None of that feels very mainstream.
It feels… institutional.

I wrote a short piece pulling together the numbers and what they quietly imply for how #Bitcoin is actually being used today.

Sharing here for informational and thought-leadership purposes only, not financial, investment, legal, or regulatory advice, in case it’s useful, or at least mildly entertaining for anyone who enjoys stats more than slogans.

#Bitcoin #InstitutionalAdoption #DigitalAssets #MarketStructure #VirtualAssets #Crypto #CryptoInfrastructure #CapitalMarkets #ThoughtLeadership #Cryptocurrency #Cryptocurrencies

Amir Tabch 

For years, Bitcoin adoption was framed as a binary question. Either institutions arrive, or they don’t. That framing is now obsolete. What happened in

Open article: Bitcoin didn’t “go mainstream”. It got institutionalized. And that changes everything. 🏛️ by Amir Tabch • 3 min read

Bitcoin didn’t “go mainstream”. It got institutionalized. And that changes everything. 🏛️

Most professionals are trained to fear volatility.

That training came from markets that close.

#Bitcoin trades 24/7/365.
No closing bell.
No weekend pause.
No overnight gap.

That one structural difference changes how price should be interpreted.

A few data points most people skip:

• #Bitcoin prices update continuously, while equities hide volatility overnight and reprice via gaps

• Since 2024, #Bitcoin drawdowns from all-time highs have stayed below 30%, versus 60%+ in earlier cycles

• As liquidity, derivatives, and institutional participation increased, volatility has compressed structurally, not exploded

Volatility is visible.
Risk is contextual.

Yet we still treat price movement as if it equals danger.

It doesn’t.

A volatile asset can survive and compound.
A “stable” asset can fail suddenly when its assumptions break.

Closing bells do not remove risk.
They postpone it.

I wrote a short article on why 24/7 markets require a different mental model, and why professionals often confuse volatility with risk.

No price targets.
No evangelism.
No crypto theatrics.

Just market structure, data, and one uncomfortable conclusion.

#Marketstructure #Volatility #Riskmanagement #Bitcoin #Digitalassets #Virtualassets #Financialmarkets #Institutionalinvesting #Cryptocurrency #Cryptocurrencies #Crypto 

👇 Article below

🎯 Vision is in lockstep

Vision is not a speech.
It is not a slide.
It is not a poster on a wall.

Vision only exists when words, decisions, priorities, & behavior move together.

The moment they drift, vision becomes narrative.

🧠 Vision breaks when behavior lags language

Most leaders don’t fail at setting vision.
They fail at keeping it synchronized.

They say speed, but reward caution.
They say ownership but override decisions.
They say excellence but tolerate exceptions.

People don’t follow what you say.
They follow what stays consistent.

When behavior falls out of step, vision loses credibility fast.

⚖️ Alignment is not agreement, it is consistency

This is where many teams get it wrong.

They chase alignment in meetings.
What they need is alignment in action.

Vision is reinforced when decisions look familiar.
When tradeoffs point the same way.
When priorities don’t change with pressure.

Lockstep does not mean rigidity.
It means coherence.

🧭 Strategy drifts when vision isn’t enforced

Vision without enforcement is aspiration.

If vision says customer first, escalation paths must reflect that.
If vision says accountability, consequences must be visible.
If vision says focus, something must be deprioritized publicly.

Strategy fails not because vision was unclear, but because it was optional.

📉 Inconsistency is louder than contradiction

Here’s the uncomfortable truth.

One inconsistent decision outweighs ten consistent messages.

Teams notice immediately when vision bends under pressure.
They adjust faster than leaders expect.

Vision doesn’t die dramatically.
It erodes quietly.

One exception at a time.

🪞 Senior leadership reality

At senior levels, every action is amplified.

What you attend signals importance.
What you delay signals tolerance.
What you excuse signals permission.

This is why vision requires discipline, not inspiration.

Lockstep is not accidental.
It is maintained deliberately.

✅ The leadership question that matters

Ask yourself this.

“If someone watched only my decisions, would they understand our vision?”

If not, the issue isn’t communication.
It’s synchronization.

Vision works only when it moves in lockstep.

With behavior.
With tradeoffs.
With consequences.

Anything else is just a story told confidently.

#Leadership #Vision #Execution #Strategy #ExecutivePresence #DecisionMaking #Accountability #Culture #CEO #Governance #Management

🔕 Leadership gets quiet before it gets heavy

Every organization talks about teamwork.
Very few talk about the moment when teamwork ends.

That moment is the CEO decision.

Early in a decision, there are voices everywhere.
Opinions. Models. Scenarios. Confidence.

Then the room clears.

Not because people do not care, but because the decision has crossed a line.
From discussion to ownership.

Advice is still available.
Accountability is not.

⚖️ When consensus becomes a liability

Consensus feels safe.
It distributes responsibility.

In regulated businesses, that safety is often an illusion.

When something goes wrong, regulators do not ask who agreed.
They ask who decided.

Consensus can slow necessary action.
It can blur accountability.
And in moments that require speed or clarity, it can be the wrong tool.

Good leaders listen widely.
They decide narrowly.

🧩 Advice vs Accountability

Advice helps you see angles you might miss.
Accountability is what you carry when everyone else goes home.

You can borrow judgment.
You cannot outsource consequences.

This is where many capable executives hesitate.
Not because they lack intelligence, but because they confuse inclusion with protection.

In reality, inclusion ends where accountability begins.

🏛️ The weight CEOs learn to carry

The hardest decisions are rarely technical.
They are human.

When to stop a project.
When to escalate an issue.
When to say no to growth.
When to say yes to discomfort.

These decisions do not announce themselves loudly.
They arrive quietly.
And they stay with you.

🧠 The Leadership truth

Leadership gets quiet right before it gets heavy.

If you need consensus to move, you are not leading yet.
If you cannot stand alone when needed, you are not ready for the role.

The CEO seat is not lonely because no one is around.
It is lonely because accountability has a single address.

And that address does not delegate.

#CEO #Leadership #DecisionMaking #Accountability #CorporateGovernance #RiskManagement #Management #Business

🎯 Advice is abundant, accountability is singular

Every leader learns this the hard way

Advice is everywhere
Accountability is lonely

You can get opinions in seconds
You can get frameworks, models, benchmarks, playbooks, Slack messages, WhatsApp voice notes, & “just one more thought” emails

But when the outcome lands, good or bad, only one name is attached to it
& everyone knows whose name that is

🧠 Advice feels light because it is weightless

There is a reason advice flows so freely

Psychology calls it diffusion of responsibility
When responsibility is shared, ownership thins
When ownership thins, confidence rises

That is why advice sounds bold
There is no cost attached

It is easy to recommend speed when you do not sign the decision
Easy to suggest risk when you do not carry the downside
Easy to say “we should” when you will not be the one explaining “why”

Advice has no balance sheet
Accountability does

⚖️ The hidden asymmetry in leadership rooms

Here is the asymmetry most people miss

10 people can advise
Only 1 absorbs the consequence

Boards advise
Committees advise
Peers advise
Advisors advise

The leader decides

& when the decision works, credit is shared generously
When it fails, accountability concentrates instantly

That is not unfair
That is the job

🧭 Why leaders confuse advice with safety

Many leaders collect advice not for insight, but for insulation

More voices feel like protection
More alignment feels like cover
More consensus feels like reduced risk

But research on decision-making says the opposite

The more people involved without clear ownership, the slower & weaker the decision becomes
Responsibility spreads. Conviction fades. Momentum dies

Advice multiplies
Accountability stays singular

🔍 Execution reveals who owned the call

You can always tell who truly owned a decision after the fact

They do not say:
“We all agreed”

They say:
“I made the call”

Leaders who hide behind advice borrow credibility temporarily & pay it back with interest later

🪞 The reality no one prepares you for

At senior levels, advice does not disappear
It gets louder

What disappears is escalation

There is no higher authority to absorb the outcome
No one to defer to when uncertainty peaks
No one to share the final weight

That is the moment leadership stops being a role & becomes a condition

You listen carefully
You decide deliberately
& you carry it alone

✅ The test that actually matters

Here is the only test that counts

Can you listen to everyone, then decide as one?

Can you take advice without outsourcing ownership?
Can you stay open without becoming diluted?
Can you say, “thank you” to every input & still say “this is my call”?

Because advice will always be abundant
Opinions will always multiply
Voices will always surround you

But accountability will never do that

It will find exactly one place to land

& leadership is accepting that place without flinching

#Leadership #Management #Accountability

🎯 Tradeoffs don’t disappear when you avoid them, they compound

Every leadership decision carries a cost.

The mistake is believing that not choosing avoids paying it.

It doesn’t.

It just adds interest.

Avoided tradeoffs don’t vanish.
They resurface later as bigger, uglier, more expensive problems.

What you delay today becomes the constraint tomorrow.

🧠 Avoidance feels safe because the bill is deferred

The human brain is wired to prefer short-term relief over long-term clarity.

Behavioral research reveals leaders systematically discount future costs when immediate discomfort is involved.

In other words, we choose silence over tension.
Delay over conflict.
Complexity over clarity.

Not because it is smarter, but because it is easier right now.

The brain mistakes delay for prudence.
Leadership pays the invoice later.

⚖️ Every non-decision is still a decision

This is the part most leaders miss.

Choosing not to decide is still choosing.

You are choosing drift.
You are choosing entropy.
You are choosing to let circumstances decide for you.

Markets do not pause.
Teams do not stay neutral.
Problems do not remain stable.

When leadership hesitates, systems fill the vacuum.

Usually badly.

📉 Compounding is not just financial, it is organizational

Compounding applies everywhere.

Small talent compromises compound into culture issues.
Minor accountability gaps compound into execution failure.
Soft standards compound into hard exits.

What starts as “just for now” quietly becomes “this is how we do things”.

By the time it is visible, it is entrenched.

🧭 Strategy dies where tradeoffs are avoided

Every real strategy demands sacrifice.

If nothing is painful, nothing meaningful changed.

You cannot maximize speed & minimize risk.
You cannot scale excellence & tolerate mediocrity.
You cannot protect comfort & demand performance.

Strategy without tradeoffs is storytelling.

Execution begins the moment something gets harder.

🪞 Senior leadership reality

At senior levels, tradeoffs get lonelier.

There is less room to blame context.
Less room to say, “we’ll see”.
Less room to defer upward.

What increases is consequence.

That is why experienced leaders decide earlier, not later.
They understand compounding.
They have paid the price before.

✅ The leadership question that matters

Ask yourself this before delaying any hard call.

“What am I letting compound by not deciding today?”

Because the cost will arrive.
The only variable is timing & magnitude.

Avoidance does not remove tradeoffs.
It converts them into penalties.

Leadership is choosing your price deliberately.

Before compounding chooses it for you.

#Leadership #DecisionMaking #Tradeoffs #Execution #Strategy #Accountability #ExecutivePresence #CEO #Governance  #HighPerformance #Management #Business

🧠 Institutional memory is really a leadership responsibility

We celebrate speed.

First movers.
Fast execution.
Relentless iteration.

But there is something equally important that rarely gets the same respect.

Memory.

Industries don’t mature just by moving forward.
They mature by remembering what already broke, what already failed, & why certain rules exist in the first place.

When memory disappears, mistakes don’t vanish.
They repeat.

🧠 What I mean by institutional memory

When I say institutional memory, I don’t mean documents, policies, or archived decks.

Institutional memory is leadership memory.

It is the accumulated understanding of what was tried, what failed, what nearly failed, & what trade-offs were made, carried forward through judgment, not paperwork.

It is knowing not just what decisions were taken, but why they were taken, & under what conditions they stopped working.

Without that, organizations don’t learn.
They reset.

🧠 Why forgetting feels like progress

Psychologically, novelty feels productive.

New leaders want to make their mark.
New teams want to prove they are different.
New industries want to distance themselves from early chaos.

Behavioral research reveals that humans systematically undervalue historical information when environments feel fast-changing. We assume the past is obsolete simply because the context looks new.

But many failures are not new at all.
They are old patterns wearing modern tools.

📉 What happens when industries lose memory

When institutional memory erodes, 3 things quietly happen.

1. Known risks get reintroduced as innovations.
2. Hard-earned safeguards get labeled as bureaucracy.
3. Old failures get reframed as bold experiments.

Research on organizational learning says that industries with high leadership turnover & weak knowledge transfer experience repeated cycles of preventable crises. The learning never compounds, because it never gets stored.

Speed without memory doesn’t create maturity.
It creates amnesia.

🧩 Institutional memory is not documentation

This is where many leaders misunderstand the problem.

Institutional memory is not policy manuals.
It is not archived decks.
It is not “someone will remember.”

It lives in leaders.

It is the judgment that says, “We tried this before, & here’s why it failed.”
It is the instinct that slows a decision not out of fear, but experience.
It is the ability to distinguish between healthy disruption & recycled risk.

When leadership changes without memory transfer, organizations regress, even as they appear to evolve.

🙂 A slightly uncomfortable truth

Every industry eventually slows down.

The question is whether it slows because it has learned, or because it has crashed.

Institutional memory is not nostalgia.
It is leadership discipline.

& the leaders who matter most are not just the ones who push things forward.

They are the ones who remember why some lines were drawn in the first place.

#Leadership #Management #Business

🎯 Being curious beats being right

Most leadership mistakes don’t come from lack of intelligence.

They come from certainty.

The moment a leader needs to be right, curiosity shuts down.
Listening narrows.
Signals get filtered.
Dissent becomes inconvenient.

Being right feels good.
Being curious keeps you effective.

🧠 Confirmation bias is the silent saboteur

Confirmation bias is not a flaw.
It is a feature of the human brain.

We subconsciously seek information that validates our existing beliefs.
We discount data that threatens them.
We favor voices that agree with us.

The higher the role, the stronger the bias.

Power reduces challenge.
Success reinforces confidence.
Feedback becomes polite.

Curiosity is the only counterweight.

⚖️ Leaders who ask better questions decide better

Strong leaders don’t dominate conversations.
They shape them.

They ask questions before giving answers.
They explore before concluding.
They listen without rehearsing their response.

Seeking to understand is not passivity.
It is information advantage.

The fastest way to improve decision quality is to slow down certainty.

🧭 Being right ends learning, being curious extends it

The moment you prove you’re right, the conversation ends.

Curiosity keeps it open.

It invites perspectives you don’t have.
It surfaces risks you didn’t model.
It reveals assumptions you didn’t notice.

Most strategic blind spots exist because leaders stopped being curious too early.

📉 Organizations mirror the leader’s posture

Teams copy what leaders reward.

If leaders defend their views, teams stop challenging.
If leaders interrupt, teams stop sharing.
If leaders listen deeply, teams bring better thinking.

Curiosity scales faster than authority.

🪞 Senior leadership reality

At senior levels, curiosity must be intentional.

No one is paid to challenge you.
No one is incentivized to contradict you.
Silence often masquerades as alignment.

Curious leaders make it safe to disagree.
They separate ego from exploration.
They treat opposing views as assets, not threats.

✅ The leadership question that matters

Before asserting your position, ask this.

“What would I believe if I were wrong?”

Then listen like the answer matters.

Because leadership is not about winning arguments.
It is about making better decisions.

Being right feels satisfying.
Being curious keeps you relevant.

#Leadership #Curiosity #DecisionMaking #ExecutivePresence #SelfAwareness #OrganizationalBehavior #LearningMindset #Accountability #CEO #Governance #Management #Business

🛡️ Leadership is about owning the worst day

Anyone can lead on a good day.
Leaders earn their title on the worst one.

When revenue flows, systems behave, regulators are quiet, & everyone is smiling, leadership is easy. You can delegate, inspire, & talk strategy.

But that’s not leadership.
That’s weather.

Leadership shows up when something breaks.
A system fails.
A client escalates.
A regulator calls.
A decision goes wrong.

That’s the day your organization finds out who is actually in charge.

🔥 Crisis is not an exception, it’s the job

Many leaders treat crises as anomalies. Something temporary. Something to survive.

That mindset is the first mistake.

Research reveals stress doesn’t create new behaviors; it amplifies existing ones. Under pressure, teams default to the real operating model, not the one written in policies.

If escalation paths are unclear, chaos appears.
If accountability is fuzzy, blame spreads.
If leadership hesitates, confidence disappears.

Your worst day isn’t bad luck.
It’s a stress test of leadership.

🧭 The first question that matters

On bad days, teams don’t want speeches.
They want orientation.

The most important question isn’t “What happened?”
It’s “Who owns this?”

Clear ownership reduces panic.
Ambiguity multiplies risk.

High-reliability organizations recover fastest when one accountable leader is visible, calm, & decisive, even before all facts are known.

Waiting for perfect information feels responsible.
It usually isn’t.

😐 Calm is not soft, it’s strategic

Your emotional state becomes the emotional ceiling of the organization.

Under stress, teams mirror the leader’s tone & tempo. Panic spreads faster than confidence. Calm travels just as quickly.

The best crisis leaders aren’t dramatic.
They’re boring in the best way.

They speak slower.
They ask fewer questions.
They decide in sequences, not speeches.

Calm isn’t personality.
It’s skill.

⚖️ Accountability beats heroics

Bad days create accidental heroes. All-nighters. Improvised fixes. Skipped process.

It looks impressive.
It’s also risky.

Heroics often hide structural weakness. The moment passes; the system stays fragile.

Strong leaders slow the story & speed up accountability.

They don’t ask, “Who can fix this fastest?”
They ask, “Who owns this permanently?”

Owning the worst day means fixing the system, not just surviving it.

🧠 In the end...

Good days reward management.
Bad days reveal leadership.

Titles fade when things go wrong.
Slides don’t matter.
Org charts disappear.

What remains is simple.
Who steps forward.
Who stays calm.
Who owns the outcome.

Do that on the worst day,
& your team will follow you on every other one.

#Leadership #CrisisLeadership #ExecutiveLeadership #Accountability #RiskManagement #ExecutivePresence #Management #Business

🎯 Silence is a decision, it just avoids accountability

Silence is often mistaken for neutrality.

It isn’t.

In leadership, silence is a choice.
It shapes outcomes, sets direction, & signals permission.

The only thing silence does not do is stay neutral.

🧠 Silence feels safe because it delays ownership

Psychology explains why silence is seductive.

When leaders stay quiet, they experience reduced immediate stress.
No confrontation.
No discomfort.
No visible risk.

But research on decision avoidance shows the cost does not disappear.
It transfers.

Silence shifts the burden downstream to teams, systems, & time.

The leader avoids discomfort now.
The organization absorbs confusion later.

⚖️ Silence creates outcomes without authors

When leaders do not speak, three things happen.

1. People fill the gap with assumptions.
2. Standards become negotiable.
3. The loudest voice becomes the de facto authority.

None of that is accidental.

Silence delegates power without clarity.
Responsibility without authority.
Risk without ownership.

The outcome still arrives.
It just has no signature.

🧭 Culture is shaped more by silence than speeches

Culture is not built in town halls.
It is built in moments of hesitation.

When poor behavior goes unaddressed.
When underperformance is tolerated.
When values are praised but not enforced.

Silence teaches faster than policy.

It tells the team what actually matters.
It tells them what they can get away with.
It tells them who will not intervene.

📉 Silence compounds faster than bad decisions

A bad decision can be corrected.
Silence compounds.

One missed conversation becomes a pattern.
One avoided issue becomes precedent.
One quiet moment becomes culture.

By the time leaders speak up, the cost is higher, the fix is harder, & the credibility gap is wider.

Silence always charges interest.

🪞 Senior leadership reality

At senior levels, silence is rarely accidental.

It is often strategic avoidance.

Avoiding conflict with peers.
Avoiding tension with high performers.
Avoiding exposure with boards.

But leadership is not measured by how well you manage calm moments.
It is measured by how you act when speaking has a price.

✅ The leadership question that matters

Before choosing silence, ask one question.

“What outcome am I silently approving?”

Because the organization will move forward.
Behavior will continue.
Decisions will be made.

Silence does not pause the system.
It programs it.

Leadership is not about speaking more.
It is about speaking when it matters, especially when it costs you.

Silence is a decision.

Own it or replace it.

#Leadership #Accountability #DecisionMaking #ExecutivePresence #Culture #Governance #CEO #Management #OrganizationalBehavior #HighPerformance

Why tenure increases confirmation bias 👂

Most people assume experience sharpens judgment.

More reps.
More pattern recognition.
More confidence.

But there is a less comfortable truth hiding underneath tenure.

The longer leaders stay in role, the more likely they are to hear less, not more.

🧠 What experience really trains

Experience does not just build skill.
It builds filters.

Over time, leaders develop mental shortcuts to cope with complexity. These shortcuts help them move faster, but they also narrow what gets through.

Psychology research reveals that as expertise increases, people rely more heavily on existing mental models. New information is rapidly sorted into three buckets.

Fits what I already believe.
Does not matter.
Is probably wrong.

This is confirmation bias, not as a flaw, but as an efficiency mechanism.

The problem is not that experienced leaders ignore data.
It’s that they filter it before they are aware they’ve done so.

📉 Why senior leaders hear less without realizing it

With tenure comes authority.

& with authority comes signal distortion.

People simplify their messages.
They pre-filter concerns.
They frame information to align with known preferences.

Not out of fear. Often out of courtesy.

Research on hierarchical communication states that as power distance increases, the amount of disconfirming information that reaches leaders drops sharply. Leaders become confident precisely because the most challenging inputs never arrive.

The room sounds quieter.
Not because things are better.
Because fewer people are pushing.

🧩 Experience creates speed, speed creates blindness

Experienced leaders process information faster.

That speed feels like mastery.

But speed has a cost.

Fast pattern recognition favors what is familiar. It rewards past success. It quietly penalizes novelty, edge cases, & weak signals.

This is why organizations often miss early warnings.

The data was there.
Someone noticed.
But it did not survive the filters.

Experience doesn’t eliminate bias.
It automates it.

🔍 What strong leaders do to counter this

The most effective long-tenured leaders I’ve seen don’t try to “listen harder.”

They redesign how information reaches them.

They ask for dissent explicitly.
They slow decisions where they feel most certain.
They create roles & forums where challenge is expected, not exceptional.

Most importantly, they treat confidence as a signal to pause, not proceed.

When something feels obvious too quickly, they assume something is missing.

🙂 A final, slightly uncomfortable truth

Experience does not make leaders wiser by default.

It makes them faster.

& speed without deliberate friction turns insight into habit.

The danger of tenure is not arrogance.
It’s efficiency applied to the wrong inputs.

The longer you’ve been in the role, the more intentional you have to be about what you still allow yourself to hear.

#Leadership #ExecutiveLeadership #DecisionMaking #SelfAwareness #Management

🏛️ Regulation is not the enemy of crypto. It is its credibility engine.

Every market eventually reaches a moment where confidence stops being enough.

Usually that moment starts with a very simple question,
“What happens if something goes wrong?”

In unregulated markets, that question is often answered with optimism.
In regulated markets, it is answered with policies, controls, documentation, and someone whose name is actually on the line.

After years' operating inside regulated virtual asset environments, I have reached a fairly boring but very important conclusion. Regulation does not kill innovation. It mostly kills bad assumptions.

This is not a critique of crypto.
It is an argument for its adulthood.

#Crypto #Regulation #DigitalAssets #VASP #Governance #InstitutionalAdoption #Leadership #VirtualAssets 

👇 Full article below.

🧊 Psychological safety does not mean comfort 

“If everyone agrees in the meeting, something has already gone wrong.”

Most leaders say they want psychological safety.

What they often mean is harmony.
Calm meetings.
No raised voices.
No visible friction.

That version feels good.
It also quietly kills performance.

🧠 What psychological safety actually is

Psychological safety, as studied in organizational research, has nothing to do with being nice or avoiding discomfort.

It means people believe they can speak up, challenge assumptions, admit mistakes, and disagree without fear of punishment or humiliation.

Notice what is missing from that definition.

Comfort.

In fact, the best teams feel tense, not relaxed. Teams with high psychological safety often report more tension, not less. More debate. More challenge. More moments where the room gets quiet before someone says the uncomfortable thing.

That tension is not dysfunction.
It is thinking happening in real time.

📊 Why high-performing teams feel harder to be in

Research on team dynamics shows a counterintuitive pattern.

The best teams argue more.
They interrupt more.
They challenge ideas faster.

Not because they are dysfunctional, but because they are not managing egos.

When psychological safety is high, disagreement becomes data, not a threat. People stop spending energy on impression management and start spending it on problem-solving.

Comfortable teams often feel pleasant.
They also tend to avoid risk, delay decisions, and protect consensus.

Silence is easy.
Truth is expensive.

🧩 When comfort becomes a warning sign

Here is the trap many leaders fall into.

They interpret smooth meetings as alignment.
They mistake politeness for trust.
They confuse lack of friction with progress.

In reality, comfort can signal disengagement.

People stop pushing because they’ve learned it’s not worth it. Or worse, they’ve learned that challenging the narrative carries a cost.

Psychological safety does not remove tension.
It redirects it from politics to work.

🔍 What leaders who get this right actually do

Strong leaders don’t try to make meetings pleasant.

They make them honest.

They reward thoughtful dissent.
They protect people who challenge upward.
They model uncertainty without losing authority.

They understand that safety is not about reducing heat.
It’s about ensuring the heat is applied to ideas, not people.

🙂 A final, slightly uncomfortable truth

If your meetings feel calm, efficient, and agreeable all the time, that’s not a cultural win.

It’s a diagnostic signal.

The best teams are not relaxed.
They are engaged.

And engagement, when it’s real, rarely feels comfortable.

#Leadership #PsychologicalSafety #ExecutiveLeadership #TeamPerformance #WorkplaceCulture #Management #Business

Silence, not conflict, is the real culture killer 🤫

Most leaders worry about conflict.

Raised voices.
Challenging questions.
Uncomfortable meetings.

So, they optimize for calm.

But silence, not conflict, is what actually destroys culture.

🧠 Why silence feels safe and conflict feels risky

Conflict is visible.
Silence is polite.

When people disagree openly, it creates momentary discomfort. When people go quiet, everything appears fine. Meetings stay short. Decisions move fast. There is no friction to manage.

That illusion is expensive.

Behavioral research reveals that humans default to silence in hierarchical environments when the perceived cost of speaking exceeds the perceived benefit. Especially when power, status, or reputation is at stake.

People don’t stop caring.
They stop volunteering.

📉 What silence actually signals

A silent room is rarely aligned.
It is usually filtered.

High-performing cultures surface disagreement early. Low-performing cultures postpone it until it is too late to act. By the time issues emerge, they are no longer ideas, they are outcomes.

Research on team failures consistently explicates that warning signals are present long before breakdowns occur. They just go unspoken. Problems are noticed, framed mentally, and then quietly parked.

Silence is not neutrality.
It is suppressed information.

🧩 How conflict protects culture

Healthy conflict does one thing exceptionally well.

It keeps reality visible.

When people challenge assumptions, question decisions, or disagree openly, they are not being difficult. They are protecting the organization from blind spots.

Teams that argue constructively surface risks earlier, correct course faster, and avoid false consensus. Tension is not a sign of dysfunction. It is a sign that people still believe their voice matters.

The opposite of conflict is not harmony.
It is disengagement.

🔍 Why leaders often misread the signal

Many leaders unintentionally reward silence.

Not explicitly. Subtly.

They move faster when challenged less.
They respond defensively to dissent.
They explain decisions instead of interrogating them.

Over time, people adapt.

They stop pushing.
They start nodding.
They save their real opinions for private conversations.

Culture doesn’t collapse in a moment.
It erodes through omission.

🙂 A final, slightly uncomfortable truth

If your meetings are calm, efficient, and agreeable all the time, don’t celebrate yet.

Ask a harder question.

Are people aligned, or have they simply learned when to stay quiet?

Conflict is noisy.
Silence is lethal.

And the healthiest cultures are not the quietest ones. They are the ones where disagreement is still alive, visible, and safe.

#Leadership #Culture #Executiveleadership #Psychologicalsafety #Teamperformance #Management #Business

🧠 Why strategy fails when tradeoffs aren’t spoken

Most strategies don’t fail because they are wrong.
They fail because the tradeoffs were never said out loud.

Everyone agrees on the ambition.
Few agree on the sacrifices.

So, the strategy looks aligned on paper
& collapses quietly in execution.

📊 Why unspoken tradeoffs are dangerous

Strategy is not a list of priorities.
It’s a set of choices.

Behavioral research reveals people instinctively avoid loss more than they pursue gain.
So, when leaders talk about strategy without naming what will be lost, people mentally protect what they care about.

They nod.
They agree.
They keep doing what they were already doing.

Silence fills the gaps.

👀 How false alignment forms

In most strategy discussions, leaders say:

“We’re focusing on growth.”
“We’re prioritizing efficiency.”
“We’re doubling down on quality.”

What they don’t say is:

“We’re moving slower.”
“We’re saying no to these customers.”
“We’re deprioritizing these initiatives.”

So, everyone hears the upside & quietly assumes their work still matters.

It doesn’t.

But nobody said so.

🎭 What silence actually communicates

When tradeoffs aren’t spoken, people infer their own.

Teams assume:
• this is additive, not substitutive
• priorities are flexible
• execution can be negotiated later
• nothing truly stopped

That’s not strategy.
That’s hope.

And hope is not an operating model.

⚠️ Where leaders unintentionally fail

Leaders often avoid explicit tradeoffs because they feel harsh.

Naming losses creates discomfort.
Discomfort creates resistance.
Resistance feels like misalignment.

So, leaders soften the message.

But clarity delayed becomes confusion multiplied.

Research on organizational execution states that strategies with explicitly stated tradeoffs execute significantly faster than those built on broad alignment language.

People don’t resist clarity.
They resist surprise.

🧩 What real strategic clarity looks like

Real strategy sounds uncomfortable on day one.

It says:
• we will stop doing X
• we will accept risk Y
• we will disappoint group Z
• we will revisit this in six months

That level of clarity does two things:

1. It reduces noise.
2. It creates trust.

Even when people disagree, they know where they stand.

🧭 The real lesson here

Strategy doesn’t fail in the market.
It fails in meetings.

Silence creates false alignment.
False alignment creates execution drift.
Drift kills strategy.

If you want strategy to work, say the hard part out loud.

Tradeoffs are not the weakness of strategy.
They are the proof that one exists.

Leadership is not about making strategy sound good.
It’s about making it executable.

And execution begins where silence ends.

#Strategy #Leadership #ExecutiveLeadership #DecisionMaking #StrategicPlanning #Management #OrganizationalBehavior #BusinessStrategy #LeadershipDevelopment #ThoughtLeadership

🎭 Emotional masking is the hidden tax of senior roles

The most exhausting part of leadership is not the hours.
It’s the performance.

Most people think burnout comes from workload.
Too many meetings.
Too much pressure.
Not enough time off.

That’s only half the story.

What actually drains senior leaders is something quieter, more invisible, and far more corrosive.

Pretending.

🧠 The emotional tax nobody budgets for

Leadership requires emotional regulation. That part is real and necessary.

But there is a difference between regulation and masking.

Psychologists call this emotional labor, the effort involved in managing feelings to meet role expectations. Research shows a critical distinction between deep acting, genuinely aligning emotions with the role, and surface acting, displaying emotions you do not actually feel.

Surface acting is expensive.

Studies link it to elevated cortisol levels, faster emotional exhaustion, and significantly higher burnout risk. The body keeps the score, even when the calendar looks manageable.

In other words, your nervous system knows when you are performing.

📉 Why senior leaders feel this more

The higher you go, the narrower the range of emotions you’re allowed to show.

You are expected to be calm when uncertain.
Confident when unsure.
Measured when frustrated.

And grateful. Always grateful.

Research on executive burnout reveals strong correlations between role incongruence and exhaustion. Burnout accelerates when there is a persistent gap between who you are required to be and who you actually are in that moment.

It is not the stress that breaks people.
It is the sustained mismatch.

🧩 How pretending quietly erodes leadership

Here is the paradox.

The more senior the role, the more leaders believe they must hide doubt to protect others.

So, they do.

They perform composure.
They perform optimism.
They perform certainty.

Over time, leaders lose access to honest reflection, because they are rarely allowed to be unfinished in public. The mask becomes permanent, and the role starts consuming the person.

That is when burnout appears to come “out of nowhere.”

It didn’t. It was accumulating interest.

🔍 What resilient leaders do differently

The strongest leaders I know are not endlessly upbeat.

They are congruent.

They create small, safe spaces where they can drop the performance, with peers, coaches, boards, or trusted colleagues. They separate emotional regulation from emotional suppression.

They understand that composure is a tool, not an identity.

And they refuse to confuse professionalism with pretending.

🙂 A final thought, slightly uncomfortable

You don’t burn out because leadership is hard.

You burn out when leadership forces you to be someone you no longer recognize.

The work doesn’t exhaust you.
The mask does.

And the moment you realize that, you stop chasing rest and start chasing alignment.

That’s when leadership becomes sustainable again.

#Leadership #Management #Burnout

⏳ Decisions age faster than excuses

Time punishes indecision more than mistakes.

Most organizations do not fail because they made the wrong decision. They fail because they waited too long to make any decision at all.

Excuses feel safe. Decisions create exposure.
And exposure is what most leaders quietly avoid.

🧠 Why indecision is so seductive

Indecision often disguises itself as prudence.

“We need more data.”
“Let’s wait for alignment.”
“This needs another review.”

Sometimes those statements are true. Often, they are not.

They are signals of discomfort, not discipline.

The cost is rarely visible on day one. It shows up later as missed windows, stalled teams, and opportunities that quietly expire.

📉 What research and experience agree on

Decision-making research consistently shows that delayed decisions carry higher cumulative costs than early imperfect ones.

Studies on organizational agility and crisis management reveal that teams that decide early and adjust outperform those that seek certainty before acting, even when early decisions are partially wrong.

Why?

Because decisions create feedback.
Indecision creates drift.

And drift compounds.

🧩 The hidden tax of waiting

Every day a decision is delayed, several things happen:

• Teams slow down
• Accountability blurs
• Informal workarounds emerge
• Momentum leaks

By the time a decision is finally made, the environment has changed. The cost has increased. The original context no longer exists.

At that point, the decision is no longer strategic.
It is reactive.

🧭 Why leaders default to excuses

Excuses age well internally.

They sound reasonable.
They spread responsibility.
They feel reversible.

Decisions do not.

Decisions age poorly when they are avoided, because time keeps moving whether leadership does or not.

The market never pauses while committees deliberate.

🔥 The uncomfortable truth about leadership

Leadership is not about being right in hindsight.
It is about being decisive under uncertainty.

Strong leaders understand three things:
1. Perfect information never arrives.
2. Delay is still a decision.
3. Course-correction is a feature, not a failure.

Mistakes can be corrected.
Missed moments cannot.

🧠 How high-performing organizations think differently

High-performing organizations treat decisions as living commitments, not permanent verdicts.

They decide early.
They review often.
They adjust quickly.

They understand that speed with ownership beats certainty without it.

🔚 The final reality

Time forgives mistakes faster than it forgives hesitation.

Excuses sound reasonable in the moment.
They look irresponsible in retrospect.

Decisions may age poorly.
Excuses age worse.

#Leadership #DecisionMaking #Execution #Accountability #Governance #Strategy #CEO #BoardLeadership #Management #Business

🚦 Regulation is not friction. It’s leverage.

Let’s clear something up.

Most crypto and fintech companies do not hit a growth ceiling because of product, talent, or even capital.

They hit it because of permission.

📊 Some uncomfortable numbers:

• 70%+ of institutional allocators are restricted to regulated venues only
• 80%+ of failed fintechs did not die from bad tech, they lost banking access
• During market stress, regulated platforms retain materially higher volumes while others see liquidity evaporate

Yet somehow, regulation is still treated like a tax on ambition.

That is like calling oxygen “restrictive” because you have to breathe it properly.

The pattern is always the same:

• Early speed looks impressive
• Compliance looks slow
• Then the market turns
• Banks blink
• Institutions vanish
• And suddenly “regulatory overreach” becomes the post-mortem excuse

Plot twist: the market did not betray you!!
You just never secured the right to scale.

If you think compliance is boring, you’re probably right.
But boring is exactly what institutions pay for.

Sometimes the real growth hack is wearing the seatbelt before the crash.

#Leadership #Crypto #Fintech #CEO #Governance #Institutional #Trust #Regulation

👇 Full article below.

🎯 Strong opinions should be loosely held

Strong opinions are not the problem.

Rigid ones are.

Leadership requires conviction, but it also requires the humility to update beliefs when reality disagrees.

The danger isn’t having a view.
It’s clinging to it after the evidence changes.

🧠 Certainty feels good, accuracy matters more

The brain rewards certainty.

It reduces cognitive load.
It creates a sense of control.
It signals confidence.

But research in decision science reveals that overconfidence increases error rates, especially in complex systems where variables shift faster than experience can keep up.

Feeling sure is not the same as being right.

⚖️ Conviction without flexibility becomes fragility

Strong leaders take positions.
Weak leaders avoid them.

But brittle leaders defend positions long after they stop serving the outcome.

When opinions harden, information flow slows.
Dissent becomes personal.
Signals get filtered.

What once looked like confidence turns into blind spots.

🧭 Learning stops where certainty begins

Every time a leader says, “I know”, curiosity shuts down.

Teams stop offering alternatives.
Risks stop surfacing early.
Innovation narrows.

Leaders who hold opinions loosely create space for better thinking to emerge.

They can change their mind without losing authority.
Because authority comes from judgment, not stubbornness.

📉 Organizations inherit their leader’s rigidity

Teams mirror leadership posture.

If leaders defend their views, teams optimize for agreement.
If leaders revise publicly, teams surface better data.
If leaders admit uncertainty, teams help reduce it.

Strong opinions held loosely produce resilient organizations.

🪞 Senior leadership reality

The higher you go, the more dangerous certainty becomes.

Experience feels like evidence.
Past success feels like validation.
Challenge feels unnecessary.

That is exactly when leaders must loosen their grip.

The goal is not to be right early.
It is to be right eventually.

✅ The leadership question that matters

Before defending your position, ask this.

“What would change my mind?”

If the answer is nothing, the opinion is already too rigid.

Strong opinions are valuable.
Loosely holding them is wisdom.

Leadership is not about confidence alone.
It is about adaptive conviction.

#Leadership #DecisionMaking #ExecutivePresence #LearningMindset #SelfAwareness #OrganizationalBehavior #AdaptiveLeadership #Accountability #CEO #Governance #Management #Business

taplio

Amir Tabch's Linkedin Analytics

Amir Tabch

Performance ScoreAmir Tabch's LinkedIn Performance

Amir Tabch's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Amir Tabch's Linkedin Analytics

Amir Tabch

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Amir Tabch's LinkedIn Performance

Amir Tabch's Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Amir Tabch's Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreAmir Tabch's LinkedIn Performance

Amir Tabch's Best Posts (last 30 days)