Helping Buyers Acquire & Scale Small Businesses with AI | AI-Powered Deal Flow, Valuations, & Scalability

I help organizations design and implement AI that works like an operator thinks.
Not another tool. A system you can measure, trust, and scale.

Every project starts the same way: map how the work actually moves inputs, rules, outputs.
Then, build one workflow end-to-end, add guardrails, and prove the lift before scaling it.
It’s how AI moves from pilot to production with confidence.

My work spans solo operators to enterprise teams, helping them turn AI from a buzzword into a repeatable advantage that's measured in hours saved, errors reduced, and results delivered faster and more consistently.

I believe AI succeeds when it earns trust:
Clear steps, auditable logs, a human in the loop, and metrics that matter.
That’s how adoption sticks and performance compounds.

Let's connect if you care about building AI that actually works, clarity over hype, & proof over promises.

Follow for practical frameworks, shipped results, and insights from real implementations.

AI crossed a line this year.

It’s no longer experimental. It’s operational.

Stanford’s new AI Index 2025 shows what that really means:

78% of businesses now use AI.
Inference costs dropped 280× since 2022.
And 9 out of 10 top models now come from industry, not academia.

AI isn’t a “future” problem. It’s an everyday system to manage with real costs, risks, and returns.

The winners aren’t chasing hype. They’re measuring hours saved, errors cut, and handoffs that finally make sense.

Useful over shiny. One process at a time. 

Follow Brianna Bentler for practical AI workflows and measurable business results.

Brianna Bentler

I help owners and coaches start with AI | AI news you can use | Women in AI

Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025

Stop debating if your AI is “good.” Measure it.

LLM-as-a-Judge is how operators do it at scale.

It turns fuzzy reviews into consistent scores.
So you can ship, improve, and prove ROI.

What it is: an LLM that grades other outputs.
When to use: subjective, multi-criteria, high volume.
When not to: clear ground truth or legal high-stakes.

Three ways to score, pick one:
✅Single-output with a reference for grounding.
✅Single-output without a reference for style fit.
✅Pairwise comparisons for ranking variants.

Bias is real. Plan for it.

Length, order, authority, and self-favor creep in.

Mitigate with controls, not vibes.
✅ Randomize candidate order.
✅ Cap and normalize length.
✅ Hide sources and identities.
✅ Use 3 judges and average.

Make the judge predictable.
Write criteria in plain language.
Force a strict JSON schema for scores.

Reject outputs that break the schema.
Require a brief rationale with evidence.

Then validate the validator.
Test on easy, tricky, and adversarial cases.
Track precision, recall, AUROC, and agreement.

Run it next to humans and compare.
Scale without breaking the bank.
Use a small evaluation model for real-time checks.

Spot-audit with a larger model weekly.

Operators: start with one workflow this week.

Ship the judge, log every decision, improve weekly.

Save this and share with one teammate who owns QA.

Mastering LLM-as-a-Judge

I get asked every day how I stay on top of AI reports, agent updates, and the latest news.

Short answer: I built my own agents to feed me.

Long answer: I wanted a single dashboard tying it all together.

I tried rebuilding it from my database.

Fought with layouts.

Tweaked themes. Still looked wrong.

Then I stumbled on Reflex.

I rebuilt the whole thing with one prompt in under 5 minutes.

Same data.

New skin.

Cleaner flow.

No app-hopping.

No brittle config.

Just one Python stack with live reload doing the work.

The unlock wasn’t a tool.

It was a system:

capture → refine → ship, all in one track.

If you want to try it yourself, here is the link.

https://lnkd.in/ejiUHb7x

Follow Brianna Bentler for “useful over flashy” AI that ships.

Most marketers still measure work in hours.

The winners in 2025 ship in minutes.

Charlie Hills and I set out to prove it.

We mapped 9 workflows every team runs, plus the AI stacks that compress half-day projects into coffee-break tasks.

Here is the playbook:
✅Slide decks in minutes: Manus AI, Gamma, ChatGPT, Kimi
✅Carousels in minutes: Gamma, aiCarousels, Taplio, Supergrow
✅Voice intake in minutes: Relevance AI, Vapi, Lindy, Bland
✅CRM hygiene in seconds: ChatGPT connectors, Claude connectors
✅Video clips in seconds: OpusClip, VEED, Submagic
✅Automations in seconds: n8n, Zapier, Relevance, Make
✅Web apps in seconds: Lovable, Blink.new, Replit, Base44
✅Research in seconds: Manus, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude
✅Images in seconds: Ideogram, Midjourney, Gemini, ChatGPT

The outcome is simple.
❌Traditional marketing = hours of execution.
✅Vibe marketing = minutes to market.

This is not about cutting corners.
It is about trading 3-hour slogs for 3-minute sprints and letting consistency compound.

Charlie deserves huge credit for turning this into a visual you can scroll, learn, and apply today. 

I am grateful to be part of it.

If this reframed how you work, share it forward.

Teams that learn speed first will win.

Vibe Marketing 2025

Agentic AI isn’t a tool. It’s your next operating model.

IBM’s new study makes it clear.
Most leaders still optimize.
Winners redesign.

They let agents decide the repeatable work.
Humans decide what matters.
Result: net-new capabilities—not tweaks.

By 2027, autonomy inside workflows will double.
Transformation cohorts perform 32× better.
That’s not hype. It’s operating math.

Where to start this quarter:
 ✅ Finance: rolling forecasts + variance agents
 ✅ Supply chain: dynamic pricing + predictive reroutes
 ✅ HR: skills mapping + adaptive learning loops
 ✅ Customer experience: touchless support with audit trails

Design for trust.
Log every decision, handoff, and confidence score.
Measure new KPIs, not old busywork.

Agent-to-human handoff rate.
Decision accuracy.
Reasoning coherence.

Cybersecurity and ethics are baked in from day one.
Small, workflow-specific models outperform generic fluff.

One process at a time.
Ship. Measure. Iterate.

This is how operators from solopreneurs to global enterprises win the next decade.

Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI that scales.
Share with a teammate who’s designing their next system.

Agentic AI's Strategic Ascent 

AI at work is no longer experimental. The leaders are scaling workflows into operating leverage.

According to the World Economic Forum, 65% of companies now use generative AI in at least one function. 

Adoption is up. Budgets are rising. 

But scaling? That’s where most stall.

Why? Because scale isn’t about tools, it’s about systems.

The top performers do three things well:

✅Start with one high-value workflow
✅Build tight loops: clean inputs, clear finish lines
✅Track outcomes: hours saved, retries, $ per run

They don’t boil the ocean. 

They ship, measure, and expand.

If you’re a small firm wondering where to begin, here’s the play:

✅Choose one use case
✅Add relevance checks and human review
✅Measure ruthlessly
✅If it works, scale it

Context + capability = compounding ROI.

Start small. Ship it. Then scale.

Follow me for more AI news and share this with your network.

AI in Action: Beyond Experimentation to Transform Industry

AI leadership isn’t about bigger models. It’s about better systems, built around people.

❌Every year, the noise around AI gets louder.
❌Faster chips. Smarter models. Higher benchmarks.

But the University of Utah’s new AI Leadership Report cuts through it with one clear signal:

✅The real winners won’t be the ones with the best tech.
✅They’ll be the ones who build trust, talent, and governance around it.

Five insights that stood out:
1️⃣Agentic AI is already here
These aren’t sci-fi pilots. AI agents are designing trial protocols, monitoring safety, and optimizing manufacturing today.
2️⃣Skills are shifting fast
This isn’t about hiring more PhDs.
It’s about hiring people who can design guardrails, interpret outcomes, and orchestrate humans + machines. Think: clinicians who validate AI. Lawyers who translate code into policy. PMs who understand compliance.
3️⃣Trust is everything
If your AI can’t be explained, it won’t be adopted.
Transparency isn’t a buzzword, it’s a business requirement.
4️⃣Small bets beat moonshots
Start with narrow, high-friction workflows.
A 10% gain on a repetitive task > a failed pipeline overhaul.
5️⃣Hybrid teams will win
The future team isn’t all engineers. It’s “bench scientist + AI conductor.”
Cross-disciplinary beats siloed.

Why this matters beyond life sciences:

✅This is the playbook for law firms.
✅For accountants.
✅For local governments.
✅For any service org with data-heavy, compliance-driven workflows.

So don’t chase the shiniest model.
Build the most human-centered system.

Start small.
Measure trust.
Earn adoption, one process at a time.

And if you’re leading AI at your org, ask this:

What’s one high-friction process you could automate tomorrow, without risking trust?

AI Trust Stack

🚨 Gartner warns: 40% of enterprise AI agent projects will fail by 2027.

Here’s the part nobody is talking about:

AI agents aren’t just chatbots. They make decisions, call tools, and act on their own.

That’s why:
 → 77% of enterprise executives say agents will reinvent systems
 → By 2030, half of enterprise software will run on them
 → Yet 40% of projects will be canceled without proper risk controls

The missing piece? Explainability.
If you can’t answer why an AI acted, then you’re not in control; it is.

AI should extend your team, not replace your governance.

Question for you:
Would you trust an AI in your business if you couldn’t explain why it acted?

The Ultimate Guide for Agentic AI Security

Just found the best free AI agents course on the internet.

10 parts. 12 short lectures. From “what are agents?” to multi-agent orchestration.

I’ve taken 47 AI courses. This is the one of the only one's I’d recommend to my team.

Why it stands out:
Most courses teach you to build expensive chatbots. This one teaches you to implement systems that actually work. Built by practitioners who ship in production, not tutorial watchers.

Start at Part 1: What Are AI Agents. By Part 10 you’ll know why most agents fail and how to avoid it.

Follow for practical AI automation. 

Re-share to help someone skip a $2K “certification.”

P.S. Which part are you diving into first?

Thank you Aishwarya Naresh Reganti for making this and Paolo Perrone for bringing this to my attention last week. 

Sharing this to spread the word.

Most teams think “AI is AI.” The differences are bigger than they realize.

Here’s the pattern I keep seeing in real workflows:

GenAI helps you create.
AI Agents help you automate.
Agentic AI helps you think, plan, and act across multiple steps.

Three tiers. Three different outcomes.

1️⃣ GenAI
Instant content or code.
Prompt in. Output out.
Great for single tasks, not for running a process end-to-end.

2️⃣ AI Agents
This is where operational leverage starts.
Agents connect to your tools, move data, trigger events, and monitor results.
They take structured jobs off your plate and make the workflow consistent.

3️⃣ Agentic AI
The emerging layer.
Systems that reason across steps, remember context, call the right tools, and execute without being micromanaged.
This is the closest thing we have to software that operates like a team member.

For operators, here’s the bottom line:

GenAI saves minutes.
AI Agents save hours.
Agentic AI changes how the work gets done.

The real unlock isn’t choosing one. It’s knowing which layer you need for the outcome you want this month.

Credit to Greg Coquillo for the visual that inspired this breakdown.

Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI and agent workflows built for clarity, scale, and measurable results.

P.S. Which layer are you relying on today, and where does it break?

Most “agentic AI” talk still sounds like a PhD lecture.
This roadmap cuts through that.

🟩 Green = the skills that matter
🟨 Yellow = the optional layers
🟪 Purple = the tools that actually ship work

Here’s how I use frameworks like this when teams are serious about implementation:

We pick one workflow, trace it down the map, and design the smallest agent that produces reliable, measurable output. Not a demo. A system that reduces time, errors, or handoffs.

This pattern holds across all kinds of environments—anywhere people need clearer decisions, cleaner handoffs, or repeatable outcomes, this roadmap becomes the backbone.

If you want this turned into a simple 60-day plan, one accountable owner, real guardrails, and metrics that prove it works, DM me and I’ll walk you through it.

Credit to Brij kishore Pandey for the Agentic AI Roadmap 2025.
Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI roadmaps that make systems clearer, not more complicated.

Last week a Fortune 500 CEO called me.
"We spent $47M on AI. Nothing's different."

McKinsey's new report explains why.
88% of companies use AI.
Only 6% see real value.

I audited their AI stack.
73 pilots. 12 vendors. Zero integration.
They'd automated tasks, not transformed operations.

The brutal truth McKinsey & Company found after surveying 1,993 leaders…

📊 The $2 Trillion Pilot Graveyard
65% stuck testing forever.
Running experiments like science projects.
Measuring adoption instead of impact.

My client had 47 customer service bots.
Each handled one type of ticket.
When customers had complex issues, they got bounced between 5 different bots.

Response time actually got worse.

⚡ What the 6% Do Differently
They don't add AI to workflows.
They rebuild workflows for AI.

Regular companies: 47 specialized bots
The 6%: One orchestrated system

Regular companies: Track bot usage
The 6%: Track problem resolution speed

Regular companies: Protect existing processes
The 6%: Kill what AI makes obsolete

🎯 The Agentic Architecture Gap
62% are "experimenting" with AI agents.
Less than 10% have them actually working.

Because they're building agents like apps.
Isolated tools doing isolated tasks.

The winners build orchestration.
Agents managing agents.
Systems that learn from outcomes.
Architecture that scales.

We rebuilt my client's entire support system.
From 47 bots to 7 Vertical AI agents working as a team.

Results in 90 days:
- Response time: 4 hours → 7 minutes
- Resolution rate: 67% → 91%
- Cost per ticket: $47 → $3.20

McKinsey's data shows companies 3.6X more likely to succeed and focus on transformation, not tasks.

Stop adding AI to broken systems.
Start breaking systems to rebuild with AI.

The gap between 88% adoption and 6% value isn't about the technology.
It's about architecture.

Most companies used AI like email in 1995.
The 6% are building the operating system for 2030.

Which one are you?

Follow Brianna Bentler for AI strategies that actually ship value.
Save if you're tired of pilots that go nowhere.

The State of AI in 2025

We’re entering a phase of AI no one is structurally prepared for.

Agentic AI isn’t just “the next wave of automation.”
It’s the first system that forces leaders to manage technology the same way they manage people.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston Consulting Group (BCG)’s new global study makes it clear:
Adoption is exploding faster than strategy.

– Agentic AI reached 35% deployment in just two years
– Another 44% of companies are rolling it out next

But here’s what most teams aren’t ready for:

Agentic AI is both a tool and a coworker.

It scales like software.
Adapts like a person.
Depreciates like an asset.
Learns like a team member.

That duality creates four core tensions every operator must solve:

1️⃣ Scalability vs adaptability
Optimizing for pure efficiency kills the adaptive behavior that makes agentic systems valuable.

2️⃣ Experience vs expediency
These systems depreciate (model drift) and appreciate (learning) at the same time. Traditional ROI frameworks fail.

3️⃣ Supervision vs autonomy
AI works independently but must be supervised like a direct report. Most governance models can’t handle that.

4️⃣ Retrofit vs reengineer
Most AI wins start small, then expose the need to redesign the entire workflow.

The companies leading this shift do one thing differently:
They stop asking “Where should we add AI?”

They start asking “How do we reorganize around a teammate that learns, acts, and decides?”

♻️ Repost to help more leaders close the gap between adoption and strategy.
Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI built on clarity and control.

P.S. Which tension is holding your workflow back today?

The Emerging Agentic Enterprise

This is the real reason AI works in pilots but fails in production.

The new AI Standards for Global Impact report makes it clear:

AI isn’t failing because it’s moving too fast.
It’s failing because organizations are trying to scale it without the standards that make it safe, measurable, and predictable.

Three gaps stood out:

1️⃣ No shared language
Testing, reliability, and risk mean different things depending on the team. You can’t govern what you can’t define.

2️⃣ Lab tests don’t match reality
Models pass neat benchmarks, then fall apart in complex workflows with real pressure, edge cases, and human handoffs.

3️⃣ Principles aren’t the problem. Implementation is.
Ethics frameworks are everywhere. Operational guidance is not.

Meanwhile:

Governance and standards evolve separately.
 Policy says “be responsible.”
 Standards say “be measurable.”
 Workflows say “be reliable.”
 They rarely meet in the same system.

If you’re an operator, this explains the friction you feel.
The problem isn’t adoption.
The problem is the missing infrastructure underneath adoption.

AI doesn’t scale by adding more AI.
It scales by building the testing, governance, and clarity that sit below it.

♻️ Repost to help more teams understand what’s actually breaking their AI.

Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI built on clarity and control.

P.S. Where does your team still rely on intuition instead of a standard?

The Annual AI Governance Report 2025

Operators don’t win with “smarter chat.” 

They win with accountable agents that ship outcomes.

This new HubSpot  × Mindstream  report made it plain...

AI that answers is table stakes.
AI that owns a workflow is ROI.

What’s actually working (and why it sticks):
✅ Treat agents like reps: clear job, SLAs, pass bar, dashboard.
✅ Multi-agent orchestration > one clever bot. Sub-tasks, handoffs, guardrails.
✅ Memory matters. Agents that learn between sessions stop repeating mistakes.
✅ Your moat is data. Clean emails, calls, and docs beat more compute.
✅ Speed compounds. The edge is shipping a year ahead, every year.

Proof beats hype:
✅ Customer agents clearing >50% of tickets and cutting handle time ~40%.
✅ Prospecting agents booking at crazy scale (think thousands per quarter).
✅ Teams measuring agent KPIs right next to human KPIs, and keeping what wins.

How to roll this out like an operator (one process at a time):
✅ Pick a low-blast-radius workflow (missed-call follow-up, intake routing, weekly ops recap).
✅ Wire the toolbelt it can use (search, CRM write, email/SMS send, files).
✅ Run the loop: plan → act → check → retry with guardrails (rate limits, timeouts).
✅ Put it on a scoreboard next to humans (resolution %, time, quality).
✅ Review weekly. Promote what beats baseline. Retire what doesn’t.

No fluff. 
Just ROI.

Follow Brianna Bentler  for operator grade AI and,
reshare with the teammate who owns your ops dashboard.

30+ Brutally Honest AI Predictions From Industry Leaders

Most people think AI levels the playing field.
It doesn’t, yet.

Unpopular opinion:
AI isn’t the great equalizer; it’s the great separator.

A new The Brookings Institution study just ranked 387 U.S. metros by their AI readiness.
San Francisco and San Jose dominate.
The next 28 cities, such as Seattle, Boston, Austin, and New York, follow fast.
But half the country is barely moving.

And the same pattern is playing out inside companies.
A few are moving fast. Most are stuck in pilot mode.

The data boils it down to three levers of readiness:

Talent – People who can use AI to make decisions, not just prompts.
Innovation – Teams that test small and document the wins.
Adoption – Workflows that actually run in production.

You don’t need a billion-dollar lab to start.
You need one measurable process and a feedback loop.
That’s how AI spreads from one operator to an entire org.

Whether you run solo or lead thousands, the question is the same:
Which pillar are you building next: Talent, Innovation, or Adoption?

Follow Brianna Bentler for practical AI implementation from solopreneurs to CEOs focused on measurable results.

Mapping The AI Economy

AI moved from experiment to infrastructure.

Q1 2025: 87% call AI a top priority, 76% already use it.

Digital economy ≈ 15% of world GDP, and rising.
Compute is the choke point now, not features.

Inference needs petaflops; training pushes exaflops.
Liquid cooling and >100kW/rack are the new normal.

We’re moving from assistants to agents.
42% have agentic AI live; 80%+ within three years.

Multi-agent teams beat single agents by double-digit quality.
Physical AI is leaving the lab for the shop floor.

Early deployments show double-digit cost and throughput gains.
Regulators are crystallizing; compliance clocks are ticking.

Energy and carbon are first-order constraints, not footnotes.
Nations are drafting sovereign AI plays to avoid dependence.

Operator moves (one process at a time):

✅ Map workloads by FLOPs, latency, and privacy.

✅ Split train/fine-tune/infer; design for multi-vendor accelerators.

✅ Start HIL; set pass-rate, time-to-resolution, and escalation rules.

✅ Hybrid LLM: API + on-prem SLM + RAG to cut costs 30-40%.

✅ Budget liquid cooling and power orchestration from day one.

✅ Make compliance a feature: logs, audit trails, DPIA-ready docs.

✅ If you touch physical ops, pilot one humanoid cell with private 5G.

Momentum is high; constraints are real, treat compute as strategy.

Pick one workflow this week and ship the first win.

Follow Brianna Bentler for operator grade AI. 
Share with a teammate who runs ops.

Global Artificial Intelligence Report (2025)

Stop forcing code.
Start vibe coding.

It’s how operators from solo founders to enterprise teams build software that actually ships.

One workflow, one finish line, one stack.
End-state first: define “done” in a single sentence.

Then wire the boring parts so the flashy parts work.

The system behind the vibes:
 ✅ Lovable to sketch the app in minutes (UI, auth, glue).
 ✅ Cursor to tighten logic, types, and tests.
 ✅ Supabase for data, auth, and migrations that don’t drift.
 ✅ Rules files so AI follows your patterns, not its mood.

Work loop:
 ✅ Plan → generate → review → test → ship → log.
 ✅ Guardrails: strict types, Zod validation, real error messages.
 ✅ Quality gates: lint, type-check, unit tests, and a clean build.
 ✅ Artifact-or-it-didn’t-happen: screenshot, metric, or clip every time.

Why it works:
 ✅ Less context-switching, fewer bugs, faster MVPs, consistent output.
 ✅ You keep the rhythm; the IDE keeps the receipts.

Start with one feature this week.
Define the finish line in 12 words.

Draft in Lovable, refine in Cursor, commit with tests.
Ship to staging, measure one metric, and write the mini-post.

Repeat until it feels boring, because boring is scalable.

Useful over shiny.
Vibes with proof.

Follow Brianna Bentler for operator-grade AI that ships.

Comprehensive Guide: Setting Up LLM-Integrated IDEs 

Architecture > prompts.

New study: neuro-symbolic-causal agents beat LLM-only.

Translation for operators: add rules + causal checks.

Why it matters: prompts swing outcomes wildly.

LLM-only = brittle; can even lose money/trust.

System that ships looks like this:

✅ LLM proposes actions
✅ Rules layer blocks violations (floors, margins)
✅ Causal engine simulates profit & trust deltas
✅ Only safe, high-ROI actions execute

Proof (52-week e-com sim):

LLM-only: volatile, bias-prone, trust hits.
LLM+rules: safer, still leaves profit on table.
Neuro-symbolic-causal: highest profit, steadier weeks.

Operator playbook:

Set hard invariants (no exceptions).
Score actions on profit + trust before acting.
Track weekly profit, trust, and volatility like finance.
Build prompt-agnostic systems, not prompt templates.

Follow Brianna Bentler for “no fluff, just ROI” teardowns.

Beyond Prompt Engineering 

Most AI projects never make it past pilot.

But Microsoft’s new AI Diffusion Report just confirmed what we’re seeing on the ground: the shift is finally happening.

✅ 78% of large enterprises now run at least one generative AI workflow in production.
✅ Mid-market adoption is at 46% and rising fastest where governance and metrics come first.
✅ The biggest wins aren’t new models, they’re redesigned workflows.

Microsoft calls it the “post-pilot maturity” phase.
That’s when real ROI shows up, after teams re-map ownership, measure
outcomes, and build human-in-the-loop review.

The headline stat: productivity gains of 14–22% per hour once systems are re-engineered, not just layered with copilots.

In short, diffusion isn’t about access to tools. 
It’s about clarity, trust, and redesigning work so people and AI operate as one system.

If you’re leading ops, start here:
 1️⃣ Audit where time actually goes.
 2️⃣ Pick one process you can log end-to-end.
 3️⃣ Add AI only after you can measure it like a P&L line.

That’s how diffusion becomes proof, not hype.

Follow Brianna Bentler for practical AI systems that move teams from pilot → production → scale.

 P.S. Which process in your world still runs on hope instead of measurement?

taplio

Brianna Bentler's Linkedin Analytics

Brianna Bentler

Performance ScoreBrianna Bentler's LinkedIn Performance

Brianna Bentler's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Brianna Bentler's Linkedin Analytics

Brianna Bentler

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Brianna Bentler's LinkedIn Performance

Brianna Bentler's Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Brianna Bentler's Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreBrianna Bentler's LinkedIn Performance

Brianna Bentler's Best Posts (last 30 days)