Quibbly

Quibbly allows you to send both Videos and Voice Notes directly from Linkedin Desktop
🔥 Our users get 60-90% response rates
🔒 It's fully local and runs in your browser

Rehers

Most Realistic Cold Call Training Tool 
🔒 Backed by Mucker Capital

Founder & CEO

MuckerLab

Member

Scriptify.AI

Best in class talk track tool with powerful AI automations and dialer
✅ Backed by Mucker Capital (2023 Mucker Labs)
🔒 100% SOC2 Type 2 Compliant

Modern Sales Pros

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune

Research Scholar

Hey! Welcome to my profile. I run Scriptify (Muckerlabs 23) 

We build some of the best sales tools that actually help sales folks! 
1. Scriptify - Power and parallel dialer
2. Rehers - A tool that lets SDR teams practice cold calls
3. Quibbly - A point solution that adds voice notes and native video functionality on Linkedin

Feel free to check them out!

"80% reply rate on cold emails."

Spoke to an SDR who told me this.

My first thought: "Sure. And I'm LeBron James."

"You mean including the 7-step automated sequence?"

"No. The first email."

"You mean from a burner domain?"

"No. Our primary inbox."

"You mean with no links or signature?"

"No. Links, signature, the whole thing. Never lands in spam."


...Okay, I'm listening.

Here's her play.

It's not a "hack."

It's work.

She doesn't spray and pray to 1,000 people.

She picks 20.

Where does she find them?

Not in a static list.

She hangs out where her ICP is already talking.

→ Competitor's company pages.
→ Niche influencer's posts.
→ Competitor's brand advocate's posts.

She clicks the "total likes" on a popular post.

She reads the comments.

She finds 20 people who fit her ICP and are visibly active.

(No sales navigator was harmed here) 

Then, she warms them up.

→ Profile visit.
→ Like one of their posts.
→ Leave a thoughtful comment on their content.

From the prospect's view:

They see "Jane Doe visited your profile."

They see "Jane Doe liked your post."

They see "Jane Doe commented..."

Then she sends the connection request.

Result? 40-60% acceptance.
(They're active users, and she's not a stranger).

Once connected, she finds their email.

Sends a short, pain-oriented "poke the bear" email.

Soft CTA: "Open to learning more?"

But she doesn't stop there.

This is the part everyone misses.

Within an hour of sending the email...

She sends a LinkedIn Voice Note via Quibbly 

It contains zero pitch.

"Hey John, it's great connecting with you. Really liked your comment about [X]. By the way, I sent you an email earlier today, seeing that you manage a team of reps, I thought it might be relevant. Either way, great to be connected."

Think about the buyer's experience.

They're familiar with her name.

They accepted her request.

They get a relevant email. (Which is probably #178 in their inbox.)

Then they get a human voice.

This is the game-changer.

That email is just noise. But the voice note is a pattern interrupt.

It shatters the "I'm being automated" feeling.

It builds a micro-ounce of trust (hearing a voice > reading text).

And it creates a powerful "curiosity gap."

The prospect's brain says: "What email? What did she send me? I wonder if 
it's actually useful..."

They stop scrolling LinkedIn.

They tab over to their inbox.

They're not just seeing her email. They are now actively hunting for it.

They've gone from "passive recipient" to "active seeker."

They're opening it not because of a subject line trick, but because a real person they just "met" gave them a reason to.

Big difference.

It's not "Did you get my email?"

It's not "Just bumping this to the top."

It's a human, no-pressure heads-up that makes them want to look.

She's at 180% of quota.

Hasn't even picked up the phone.

Stop optimizing your automation cadence.

Start optimizing your human-to-human connection.

Devanshu Sinha

Send videos that play inside Linkedin DM 👉 quibbly.co / CEO @ Rehers & Quibbly / MuckerLabs 23

STOP USING THIS BULLSHIT FILTER ON LINKEDIN! 

Gurus and automation tools have been selling this BS to you because without it, their LI connection accept rates would become so bad you would end up getting rid of them.

The filter is "Posted on Linkedin"

The thing is, only 1% people actively post on Linkedin, so it is NOT an indicator of who is active and who isn't

Automation tools keep shilling this to you because for them, a 12% connect rate is mind blowing. 

Do you know what my connect rate is? Over 70% 

All you need to do everyday is find 20 people to send connection request to. Here is where you find them -

1. People who have liked / commented under big industry influencer posts
2. People who have engaged with YOUR post or viewed your profile
3. People who have liked / commented under competitor brand advocates
4. Followers of competitor pages
5. People who have liked / commented undercompetitor page posts

Maintain a big list of all these categories of people and pages, and you will easily find highly targeted 20 folks who are active on Linkedin. 

YOU WILL NEVER RUN OUT OF PROSPECTS.

Note, you only need 20 people, everyday, that's it!

Once you find the 20, engage with them, send them a blank connection request, and then drop a video DM.

Follow up via memes, text and voice notes. 

Rinse and repeat every single day.

See the magic.

"Dev, our main outbound motion is email. Period."

This was from a VP of Sales I spoke with recently.

I was curious, so I asked why she was so committed to that one channel.

She told me that when she was a rep, she wrote killer emails. Manually. They were personal, sharp, and they booked her tons of meetings.

I get it. We tend to favor the tools that made us successful.

But what works for one person isn't a universal law.

Forcing an entire team of 12 unique individuals to use your favorite play feels like a mistake.

Some reps are incredible writers. Let them write.

But others have a gift for conversation that's lost in a subject line. Their talent shines on a cold call.

Others have a personality that jumps through the screen in a video DM.

Forcing them to only write emails is like asking a fish to climb a tree.

Instead of asking, "How can my team write emails like I did?"

Maybe the better question is, "Where can each person on my team be most human and connect most effectively?"

What do you think?

A BDR manager signed up to Quibbly last week

Their main concern - "Dev, why the 3 day trial? It's not enough time"

This is a question I get asked a few times every week

I have a simple answer - "I can actually reduce it to 24 hours and you will still end up buying it, just send 20 video DMs today and go back to sleep."

BTW, they ended up getting Quibbly for the entire team, and now have added it as a high priority activity in all their sequences on outreach. 

Their next message -> "This is one of the best investments for the team, we have pretty much cracked Linkedin DMs with this". 

I have only ever done very light prospecting for Quibbly, but due to the crazy AI oversaturation right now, it's more in demand than ever. 

BDR teams are adding it to their sequences to get more replies (7x higher than baseline)

AEs are using it to reduce no shows by sending videos as soon as the meeting is booked (some I know have gone from 60% shows to 90%)

CSMs are using it to upsell tangential services

Recruiters are using it to stand out in a sea of recruitment messages

It's a tool built for you, to stand out in the crowd.

A voice note landed in my LinkedIn DMs.

I almost always listen.

This time, I wish I hadn't.

The voice was… off.

Perfectly modulated, yet completely dead. Like a GPS giving directions to a funeral.

It mentioned a "recent" post of mine.

From 3 months ago.

My first thought?

Scrappy founder. Bootstrapped. Doing whatever it takes to get a meeting. I almost respected the hustle.

Almost.

But curiosity got the best of me. I clicked their profile.

BDR.

At a mid-market company.

...with a sales team of 20+ reps. 🤯

This is where my brain short-circuited.

They hired 20 human beings.

With unique voices. Personalities. Quirks. The very things that build connection.

And then paid for technology to strip it all away? To turn them into monotone clones?

The question isn't why use AI.

The question is: what are the 20 humans being paid to do?

If your outbound strategy is to automate the one thing that can't be automated -> humanity, you've already lost.

The tragic irony? The idea was good. Voice notes work because they're personal. They cut through the noise.

But sending a fake, AI generated voice is like sending a mannequin to a networking event. It’s not just ineffective, it’s creepy.

The goal should be to enable humans, not erase them.

If the process of sending real voice notes is too clunky, fix the process. Don't 
fake the human.

(Tools like Quibbly solve this, letting your reps record real voice notes and videos right from their desktop. It removes the friction, not the person).

When you send a fake voice, you're not building a bridge.

You're burning it.

And you're telling your own team that their real voice isn't good enough.
Please. Stop.

Are we really faking typos to sound more human now?

Got this email today:

"Hey Devanshu, I know how Apollo tripled its reach to sDR teams. Is this a good place to share how Scriptifyai can do the same?"

Notice the lowercase 'r' in "sDR"?

This isn't a mistake. It's a calculated tactic. 

An attempt to make a mass, templated email feel like it was typed by a human, just for me.

Is this what we’ve come to? Deliberately inserting errors into our spam to trick people into thinking we're authentic? 

It doesn’t feel human. It feels manipulative.

But the typo isn't even the biggest issue here. It's the giant, unsupported claim that follows.

"I know how Apollo.io tripled its reach..."

My first thoughts were:

How do you know? Did you work there? Did you lead that project?

Where's the proof? Is there a case study on your website featuring Apollo? (I checked. There isn't).

Why should I believe you? You're asking me to trust a huge claim from a complete stranger with zero evidence.

This is the fundamental problem with so many outreach emails. They try to manufacture authenticity with a silly typo, while the core message is completely hollow.

Instead of faking a mistake, what if you gave me a reason to believe you?

Imagine if the email said:
"I read the case study on how Apollo tripled its SDR reach and noticed they did X. We helped a similar company achieve Y..."

"My co-founder used to lead the growth team at Apollo. One thing she found was..."

See the difference?

One is a cheap trick. The other builds credibility.

Stop faking humanity and start earning trust.

What do y'all think?

Finally, login / sign up with Google is active on Quibbly. 

No need for a password, or login via OTP

Got wayyy too many requests for this. 

---
📌 If you are seeing this random post in your feed, it means your Linkedin response rates can be improved by 7x. 

👉 Instead of regular text DMs, try sending the same message as a voice note via Quibbly's chrome extension. If you don't see a 7x increase in replies, I will eat a shoe.

Taplio

Devanshu Sinha's Linkedin Analytics

's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Want to drive more opportunities from LinkedIn?

Taplio

.css-1jgreyo{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39,43,72,1) 0%, rgba(33,47,183,1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Devanshu Sinha's Linkedin Analytics

's Best Posts .css-qqfgvy{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);}(last 30 days)

Want to drive more opportunities from LinkedIn?

Devanshu Sinha's Linkedin Analytics

's Best Posts (last 30 days)