
The two best ranked MagicPost reviews on Google quote five different prices between them: $29, $39, $59, $99 and $109. Not one of those numbers appears on the MagicPost pricing page today.
That is the state of this search result. Reviews written in 2025, never touched since, still telling you what to budget in 2026.
This review lives on the Taplio blog. We build a LinkedIn tool, so we compete with MagicPost. We are not neutral and we will not pretend to be. What we can promise is that every number below was read on magicpost.in on August 24, 2026.
By the end you will know which plan to take, or why you should take none of them.
We scored six areas out of 5, against the product as it ships in August 2026.
Read the spread, not the average. The measurement half of MagicPost is a mature product. The writing half is one AI post generator among forty, and it scores like one.
That gap drives every decision below, starting with which plan you pick.
MagicPost is a LinkedIn-only tool built in France, led by Naïlé Titah. The site claims 100k+ users and a 4.8 out of 5 Google rating on 430 reviews.
Here is the concession, and it is a real one. MagicPost is a LinkedIn-verified partner. It publishes through the official API with an OAuth connection, and it ships no Chrome extension.
That matters more than it sounds. An extension works inside your logged-in session, and LinkedIn has shut extensions down before. Kleo lost its own that way and had to rebuild as a web app.
With MagicPost there is nothing to install and no session cookie in play. You approve the app the way you approve any tool built on LinkedIn's official developer platform, and you revoke it from your LinkedIn settings when you stop paying.
MagicPost bundles six things. Three explain the price. The other three are competent and replaceable.
You pick an angle: Actionable, Inspiring, Introspective or Promotional. You set tone, language and emoji density. You can drop a file or a URL in as context, and you can import a writing style from a LinkedIn profile, yours or a creator you follow.
The drafts come out clean. Structure holds, hooks land, and the French and English outputs both read like a person wrote them.
The limit is structural. Style import is a setting you apply, not a memory the tool keeps. Every session starts from zero, so you re-teach the tool who you are each time. After a few weeks the outputs collapse into the same three shapes.
Feed it a theme, a persona or a URL. It returns unlimited angles, and it opens a library of 2M+ posts you can browse from the Creator plan up. You can also point it at a single creator and pull apart what works in their feed.
Users praise this one more than any other, and our 4.3 out of 5 follows them. A blank page problem dies in under a minute.
For scale, the deepest inspiration databases in this category run past 5 million posts. 2M+ is solid without being the largest catalogue you can buy.
Ask for openings and you get a handful in seconds. It works.
It also works for everyone else, which is the problem. The patterns it returns are the ones already saturating your feed: the one-line question, the contrarian setup, the number drop.
Use it to break the freeze, then rewrite the line in your own words. That is true of every hook generator on the market, MagicPost included.
You get impressions, followers gained, posts per week, cumulative curves, top posts and recommendations you can act on. LinkedIn hands you raw counts. MagicPost hands you the trend line and points at the format that earned it.
This is the highest score on our card at 4.4 out of 5. The entry plan is named after it, which tells you where the company thinks its strength sits.
One caveat on reading your own numbers. Without an outside reference, a 3% engagement rate means nothing. The LinkedIn benchmark, built on 60k+ posts analysed every month, gives you the median to measure against.
Connect the account, queue posts and comments, switch between a list view and a calendar view. Publishing fires when it should.
There is no smart layer on top. No auto-reshuffling, no send-time optimisation, no conditional queues. It moves your drafts to LinkedIn on time, and that is the entire promise.
For a solo poster shipping three times a week, that is enough.
MagicPost watches who likes and comments on your posts, scores each person against your ideal customer profile, and lets you export the list. Engagement lists and scheduled comments sit beside it.
This is the real 2026 addition, and it is the single reason most published MagicPost reviews are now out of date.
Note the boundary, because it comes back later. Lead detection works on people who already found you. It has no way to surface someone who has never engaged with your account.
MagicPost shows the yearly rate by default. That single toggle is how reviews end up quoting a price nobody pays monthly.
Three things follow from that grid. The yearly discount is 40%, so paying month to month costs you close to double. The $21 plan writes nothing at all. And the team tier has no number, so an agency cannot budget without a call.
The real question is not MagicPost or no MagicPost. It is Analytics or Creator. Anyone who came for the AI needs Creator, so the honest entry price is $39 a month on a year commitment, or $69 if you want to stay free to leave.
Prices read on the MagicPost pricing page on August 24, 2026. For reference, Taplio's plans start at $39 a month too.
What it does well:
What it does not:
Take MagicPost if you are a solo creator, coach, consultant or employee who wants to hold a posting rhythm, and who wants zero extensions on their browser. Take something else if LinkedIn is a sales channel and the people you need have not met you yet.
MagicPost displays a 4.8 out of 5 Google rating on 430 reviews, and a "100k+ users" line, on its own site. Both are vendor reported. Read them as marketing.
The independent pools are smaller than they look. Product Hunt shows 5.0 out of 5, on five reviews, which is a testimonial rather than a signal. Trustpilot holds the largest public pool of MagicPost reviews, and G2 carries the buyer-side ones.
We are not freezing a Trustpilot score into this page. Scores move, and a frozen number is exactly what makes the competing reviews wrong today. Open the page and read the last month yourself.
The themes are stable across every source. On the positive side: it unblocks the blank page, the analytics are readable, and people value that no extension is required. On the negative side: outputs turn repetitive after a few months unless you keep changing the inputs. That is the personalization score showing up in daily use.
We hit this limit twice above. Lead detection only reads people who engaged with you, and nothing in the product reaches anyone else.
If that ceiling is your problem, three tools solve different parts of it.
Then there is us. Taplio runs the whole loop: an AI trained on 3 million+ posts, idea research, writing, scheduling, engagement, analytics and leads in one workspace. 12k+ creators and teams use it. Plans are $39, $69 and $199 a month, or $32, $49 and $149 billed yearly. The promise is 10 minutes a day, and the trial runs 7 days with full Pro access.
Take MagicPost if publishing consistently is the problem. Take Taplio if the problem is that publishing is not turning into pipeline.
For the numbers side by side, read the full head to head on features and price. For the wider LinkedIn tool landscape, start with the pillar.
3.8 out of 5. MagicPost measures LinkedIn better than tools that cost three times more, it finds ideas fast, and it connects to your account the clean way, through the official API.
It does not remember your voice, it does not price its team tier in public, and it does not reach past the audience you already have.
Plan recommendation: Creator or nothing. The $21 Analytics plan is a dashboard, not a writing tool, and buying it to "try the AI" buys you no AI. If $69 a month feels steep for one generator and one library, that instinct is worth listening to.
That last gap is the one that decides renewals. A tool that publishes for you pays for itself once. A tool that turns publishing into conversations pays for itself every month. See the two products side by side before you commit a year.
Try Taplio free for 7 days, full Pro access, no plan to pick upfront.
Two paid plans. Analytics is $35 a month, or $21 a month billed yearly ($252 a year). Creator is $69 a month, or $39 a month billed yearly ($468 a year). Team and Agency are quote only. The pricing page shows yearly rates by default.
There is a free trial with no credit card and no commitment. You generate a few posts and test most features before paying. MagicPost does not publish a post count for the trial, so treat it as a sample, not a free plan.
It is a LinkedIn-verified partner. It publishes through the official API with an OAuth connection and ships no Chrome extension, so nothing runs inside your logged-in session. You can revoke the access from your LinkedIn settings at any time.
No. You can import a writing style from a LinkedIn profile when you set up, yours or a creator's, but that is a setting and not a memory. Each session starts fresh. Users raise this limit more than any other.
Yes, on the Creator plan. Visuals and carousels sit in the plan description on the pricing page today. Reviews that still list no carousel support as a drawback were written before the feature shipped and never updated.
It depends on the gap you feel. AuthoredUp at $19.95 a month if you only need formatting and preview. Supergrow from $19 a month for carousels and repurposing. Taplio if you want the full loop, from finding the idea to spotting the lead.
Join 12,000+ creators who let their coach turn the blank page into a plan and watch their audience compound.
7-day free trial · 30 day money back · Cancel anytime

Get free monthly benchmarks on reach, engagement, and content format performance.
Get the Benchmark