Paste a LinkedIn post and see if it reads like the generic, repetitive content LinkedIn now filters. Get a slop risk score, the exact lines that give it away, and what to add so the post sounds like you.
LinkedIn defines AI slop as generic or repetitive posts that add no real insight. It is about the content, not the tool: a post written with AI help is fine if it says something specific.
LinkedIn does not target AI-assisted writing as such. It targets generic, repetitive posts. Since October 2026 its classifiers check every post distributed beyond your immediate network, so a post flagged as slop mostly stays with your first-degree connections.
With a teacher and student model setup trained partly on member reports, plus AI agents that each check one policy (for example promotional, achievement or timely posts) and send unclear cases to human reviewers. LinkedIn reports 94% precision.
No, and no tool can. This detector does not guess who wrote the post. It measures how close the post is to what LinkedIn says it filters: template patterns and a lack of specifics.
AI detectors try to predict whether a model produced the text. That is not what decides your reach on LinkedIn. A human can write slop and an AI-assisted post can be excellent. This tool checks genericness and template patterns, the criteria LinkedIn has published.
Under 35. Most posts with a real example, one number and a clear opinion land there, even if they were drafted with AI.
No. The check runs entirely in your browser. Your text is never uploaded, logged or used for training.
Not yet. The patterns and the substance signals are tuned for English posts. A post in another language will get a score, but it will not be reliable.
Yes. No sign-up, no daily limit, and you can run it as many times as you want.