Hi, I’m Anna Bilan, Founder of Brightwork AI. We help small—to mid-sized companies integrate AI into their operations for maximum efficiency and growth. I bring years of consulting expertise, empowering professional firms, insurance companies, financial institutions, and healthcare organizations to harness the power of AI for measurable results.

---

Services Offered:

1. Executive AI Strategy Sessions:  
   Tailored consultations to help leaders identify high-impact AI opportunities and create actionable roadmaps for success.

2. Custom AI Software Implementation:  
   End-to-end development of AI solutions, designed to address your unique business challenges and streamline operations.

3. Adopting Internal AI Tools:  
   Seamlessly integrate advanced tools like Microsoft Copilot, Gemini 2.0, and other cutting-edge platforms into your workflows.

4. Employee AI Training:  
   You can give your team the skills to effectively adopt AI technologies, fostering innovation and efficiency across your organization.

---

Why Work with Brightwork AI?  
☑️ Expertise in simplifying complex AI concepts for practical use in professional firms, insurance, financial services, and healthcare.  
☑️ Proven success in delivering AI solutions that enhance decision-making, reduce operational costs, and drive growth.  
☑️ A client-focused approach to ensure measurable ROI and long-term value.

---

📩 Let’s Work Together:  
✉️ Email: anna@brightworkai.com  
🔗 LinkedIn DM: 

Message me “AI Growth” to discuss how we can future-proof your business with transformative AI solutions.

I got fired for challenging my manager's thinking.

They called it "not being a team player."
I called it finding the best solution for a company. 

My manager built a fan club, not a team.
The moment client was qualified he overtook the sale. 
Every meeting was a chorus of "great idea, boss."
Extreme bottle neck. Failed deals. Unmotivated team. 

I asked questions. Real ones.
"Why are we doing it this way?"
Here is a real problem. Fact 1. Fact 2. Fact 3. 
"What if we tested the opposite?" Argument backed by data - 1, 2, 3. 

The room would go silent.
Manager's face would tighten. I already know everything you say. 
The fan club would look down like nothing happened. 

Three months later: "We're letting you go."

The corporate equation:
Silence + Agreement = Paycheck continues
Questions + Pushback = Clean out your desk

Weak leaders collect yes-people to boost their ego. 
Strong leaders WANT you to disagree.

That firing? Best thing that happened to me.

Now I run an AI & Personal Brand Agency where disagreement is mandatory.
My best hires argue with me daily.
My worst hires never challenged anything.

3 signs you're in a fan club, not a team:

1. Boss doesn't let you speak
2. Discussions & Brainstorm is not welcomed 
3. They hire for compliance, not competence

The irony:

That manager who fired me?
Department restructured 6 months later.
Company pivoted to my exact strategy.
Paid consultants $100K for what I said free.

Today, "that's a terrible idea, Anna" happens daily in my business.
The best idea wins, not the loudest voice.

Your competitors are building fan clubs.
You're building teams that challenge everything.

💭 What truth got you in trouble at work?

♻️ Share to help others 
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for real talk about building vs. performing

Anna Bilan ⚡️

JSESSIONID

li_at

Top 1% LinkedIn Creator Worldwide | Helping You to Escape Corporate & Develop AI Skills | CEO- BrightWork AI | exBig4 | National Champion in Aerobic Gymnastics

You're paying $997 for AI courses while Google gives you better tools for free.

The biggest AI scam. It's the courses teaching you to use it.

Here's what happened:

Last week, I watched someone spend their rent money on an "AI masterclass."
Lost a job. I can't get a job if I won't be AI Savy. 
The course was teaching ChatGPT basics and calling it revolutionary.

Meanwhile, Google's offering 11 tools that would've saved them $997 and actually delivered results.

I spent 732 days testing every AI tool that exists.
Most are garbage, built on GPT. But Google's free stack? Different story.

Here's what the $997 courses won't tell you about Google's arsenal:

1. FIREBASE STUDIO
Not just another website builder.
Build and launch actual apps. No code. No BS.
While others are stuck in WordPress hell.

2. VEO (Video Generation)
Create video clips from text prompts.
Your competitors are hiring video editors.
You're typing sentences.

3. GEMINI ASK ON YOUTUBE
Chat with any video to extract insights.
Skip the 47-minute ramble. Get the 3 points that matter.
Time saved = money earned.

4. GEMS IN GEMINI
Build custom AI assistants using your actual data.
Not generic ChatGPT responses. YOUR knowledge. YOUR voice.

5. NANO BANANA
Already wrote about this killing stock photography.
Edit AI images until they don't look like AI garbage.
188 failures taught me: This is the real deal.

6. GEMINI IN GOOGLE SHEETS
Generate formulas, text, and insights inside spreadsheets.
Stop pretending you know VLOOKUP.
Let AI handle the Excel wizardry.

7. GOOGLE APP BUILDER
Build apps with prompts or templates.
No coding bootcamp needed.
Just ideas and execution.

8. IMAGEN/NANO BANANA (Media Generation)
Create visuals from simple prompts.
But here's the secret: Technical prompts beat creative ones.
Production notes > "Make it pretty"

9. GEMINI LIVE
Host AI chats with screen sharing.
Perfect for client presentations when you need backup.
Your co-presenter never gets nervous.

10. GOOGLE AI STUDIO
Test models, adjust settings, compare results.
This is where you graduate from prompt tourist to prompt engineer.

11. NOTEBOOKLM
Turn any source into summaries, audio overviews, quizzes.
Your research assistant that actually reads everything.

The equation that actually matters:
Course certificate + No practice = Unemployed with debt
Free tools + Daily usage = Skills that pay bills

While everyone's collecting completion badges,
You're shipping actual work.

That gap? That's where careers get built.

Stop buying hope. Start building skills.

💭 Which expensive course are you considering that Google already solved for free?

♻️ Share for someone about to waste money on AI education
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI strategies that actually work 
🔄 Repost this to help others learn AI
Image Credit to Andrew Bolis

Influencer (700+ Brand Collabs) 🧠 AI & Marketing Consultant 📢 Former CMO 📩 DM for Influencer Partnerships ➡️ Follow for AI & business growth tips.

Or Herman 🇮🇱

"Gen Z is lazy. Millennials are entitled. Boomers can't adapt."
I believed all of it. Then I actually managed them.

I had 4 generations working for me at the same time.
Nothing worked until I cracked the code.

Here's the uncomfortable reality:

You're not managing ages. You're managing expectations.
And I learned this the hard way.

Gen Z developer. Millennial marketer. Gen X operations. Boomer client advisor.
Four generations. One startup. Total chaos.

The scorecard after week one:
Team assembled = 4 people
Actually productive = 0
Days until first crisis = 3

My Gen Z developer needed flexibility. Not wanted. NEEDED.
But the role required specific hours and location.
I tried forcing discipline. She tried forcing flexibility.
We both lost. Had to let her go.

Lesson #1: Wrong person + Right intention = Wrong outcome

My Boomer client kept schooling me.
"Let me tell you how this really works..."
I was her coach. She was treating me like her student.

The immigrant mathematics of authority:
Age difference + No respect = Zero progress
Relationship first + Authority second = Breakthrough

Started asking about her grandkids. Shared stories about my parents.
Built the relationship before the business.
Suddenly, she started listening.

My Gen X employee was brilliant but checked out.
I kept micromanaging. Making it worse.

Then I tried: "Here's the problem. You own it."
80% productivity increase. Overnight.

The Millennials were dying for meaning.
"Why does this matter?" "What's the mission?"
Gave them the why. Productivity soared.

Here's what actually works:

GEN Z: Give them outcomes, not hours
Judge the work, not the workplace
If you need strict schedules, hire accordingly

MILLENNIALS: Give them mission, not tasks
Feedback isn't optional, it's fuel
Purpose drives them harder than paychecks

GEN X: Give them problems, not processes
Trust their experience, skip the meetings
Autonomy unleashes their expertise

BOOMERS: Give them respect, not instructions
Relationship before task, always
Authority comes through connection, not title

The plot twist:

Every generation wants the same thing:
To be understood. To contribute. To matter.
They just need different keys to unlock it.

My team now:
Different Gen Z developer (remote-first role)
Same Millennial marketer (with clear mission)
Same Gen X operations (with full autonomy)
Same Boomer advisor (who respects our relationship)

Combined output? 10x what it was.

Your competitors are fighting generational wars.
You're building generational bridges.

💭 Which generation are you trying to force into the wrong box?

♻️ Share for every manager still using one-size-fits-all leadership
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for real talk about building teams that work

7 things I wish I knew before getting fired in 30 seconds.

They disconnected my access while still on the call.
30 seconds that changed everything.

1. Trust your gut.
Envious boss. Weird energy. Tension in meetings.
I ignored it. Big mistake.

2. Document everything.
They fired me before seeing my dying grandfather.
To avoid paying for bereavement leave.
No proof = no case.

3. Your emergency fund math is wrong.
I had $147K saved. Burned $99K in 18 months.
Real formula: Monthly expenses × 2 × 18 months.

4. Corporate friends aren't real friends.
1,084 connections from my old job. 
Posted about my business 6 months later: 12 likes.
Your value = your company email.

5. They'll time it to hurt you most.
Before vacation? Check.
Before the bonus? Check.
It's business, not personal.

6. "No budget for education" = run.
I paid $14,500 for boot camp.
Company education budget: $0.
They fired me for taking 90 minutes for an exam.

7. The best revenge is massive success.
That manager who said I "don't add value"?
I'm now a Top 100 LinkedIn Influencer.
That company? Still unprofitable after 10 years.

To everyone sensing something's off:
Trust your gut.
Document everything.
Build your brand NOW.
Save like your life depends on it.

Because one day, it might.

♻️ Share with someone who needs this TODAY
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for survival guides from the other side

P.S. Still have my termination call notes framed in my own office. Daily reminder that borrowed credibility expires. What you build yourself lasts forever.

7 things i wish i knew before getting fired

AI didn't come to replace us.

It came to show us how much of our work was fake.

5 years at Big4 Consulting building $10M+ products.
80-hour weeks. Endless PowerPoints.
$105K to create "deliverables."

Then AI automated 60% of my job in minutes.

That's when the truth hit:

If a bot can do your job...
Were you ever really working?
Or just performing productivity?

I watched AI handle:
→ The reports nobody read
→ The meetings that should've been emails
→ The analysis we copy-pasted anyway
→ The frameworks we recycled for every client

What was left?
The uncomfortable silence.

Because here's what nobody admits:

Most "knowledge work" is just expensive theatre.

We created jobs to manage jobs.
Built processes to justify processes.
Held meetings to plan meetings.

AI didn't steal our work.
It exposed that the work wasn't real.

When I got fired in 30 seconds,
I thought I lost everything.

But I'd already lost it.
Lost years pretending busy meant valuable.
Lost time in a system built on artificial complexity.

Now I run my own AI agency.

The difference?
Every hour has to create real value.
No hiding behind corporate theatre.
No 50-slide decks saying nothing.

Just results. Or bankruptcy.

And that clarity? That's freedom.

Because when AI strips away the fake work,
You're left with a choice:

Keep pretending the emperor has clothes.
Or build something that matters.

Most will choose the pretense.
The few who choose reality?

They'll build the future.

We're not afraid AI will replace us.
We're afraid it already has - we just kept showing up.

♻️ Repost if you felt that in your soul
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for uncomfortable truths about the future of work

I'm joining Startup Grind Toronto as Media Partner. 

My mission hasn't changed; it's just gotten bigger. 

Create 1M entrepreneurs around the world. 
Making people believe in themselves enough to use their full potential. 

Now I'm partnering with the world's largest startup community. 250+ chapters. 120 countries. 5,000+ founders monthly. 

To help you build your potential, bring VCs, talent, and other resources to make you unstoppable and move innovation across the world! 
Thanks, Daria Tilikanova, for the opportunity.

They said I'd add no value to their group.

Fair enough. They're probably right.

These entrepreneurs built empires while I was learning to walk.
30 years of experience versus my 2 years of building.
Of course, there's a gap.

But gaps are just countdowns.

Gymnastics coach, 15 years ago: "You need more development."
Found extra training. 2 years later, I was consistently winning her team.

York University: "Not ready yet." Failed 4 times.
Built experience. They eventually sponsored my mini-executive MBA.

This peer group: "Come back when you have more to contribute."
Challenge accepted.

The math of timing:
Their experience = 30 years
My hunger = Unlimited
Time until we're peers = 12-24 months

Here's what rejection taught me about respect:

They're not wrong. I'm just not there yet.
And that's exactly the fuel I needed.

No hard feelings. No burned bridges.
Just clarity on the work ahead.

I thanked them for the honest feedback.
Connected with a few members individually.
Asked what "ready" looks like to them.

The immigrant mathematics of growth:
Rejection + Resentment = Stagnation
Rejection + Respect = Rocket fuel

That gymnastics coach? We grab coffee when I'm in town.
York professors? They invite me to guest lecture.
This peer group? Future collaborators, not enemies.

Because here's what 732 days taught me:

Today's "not yet" is tomorrow's "welcome aboard."
But only if you do the work instead of taking it personally.

They gave me a gift: a clear target.
Now I know exactly what level to reach.

The gap between where I am and where they are?
That's not rejection. That's a roadmap.

While others argue about unfairness,
I'm building toward undeniable.

See you at the table in 12 months.
Not to prove anything.
Just to contribute what I couldn't today.

Your competitors are burning bridges over rejection.
You're building bridges to future partnerships.

💭 Who told you "not yet" that you should thank instead of resent?

♻️ Share for someone turning rejection into rocket fuel
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for brutal truths about growing through "no"

Nano Banana just killed stock photography. But only if you know these 5 prompts.

The best Nano Banana prompts aren't creative. They're technical.

I tested it for 48 hours. 188 failures taught me more than 5 successes.

Here's what nobody tells you about AI image generation:

Everyone's typing "make it pretty" into Gemini.
Getting the same generic AI garbage.
Then wondering why their visuals look like everyone else's.

The real equation that matters:
Generic prompts + Nano Banana = Stock photo vibes
Production notes + Camera settings = Vogue-quality shots

I generated 200+ images. Deleted 188 of them.
The 5 that survived? They're not prompts. They're blueprints.

The difference between amateur and pro?
Amateurs describe what they want.
Pros give production notes.

Stop prompting like you're ordering coffee.
Start directing like you're Spielberg.

Your competitors are asking Gemini to "make it nice."
You're giving it a shot list.

That gap? That's where scroll-stopping visuals live.

💭 What's the worst AI image prompt you've seen this week?

♻️ Share for someone whose AI images scream "I used ChatGPT"
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI strategies that actually deliver

How to prompt with nanobanana

Everyone's asking the same question: "Which AI should I use?"

Here is your answer. 

The brutal math of AI adoption:
6 tools dominating the market.
1000s of founders still using ChatGPT for everything.
Zero understanding of which tool does what best.

I spent the last few months burning through AI subscriptions like instant noodles.

Testing. Breaking. Comparing.
Because immigrant mathematics taught me: Use the right tool or lose.

Here's the no-BS breakdown of the top 6:

Claude 4.5 - The one I abuse daily
Best for: Structured writing, legal docs, complex analysis
Handles massive context windows without breaking a sweat
Reality check: Too cautious for creative chaos

ChatGPT-5 - The reliable workhorse
Best for: Content creation, research, workflow automation
Most versatile and user-friendly of the bunch
Reality check: Hallucinates on niche topics, costs add up fast

Perplexity - The fact-checker's dream
Best for: Market research, verified data, quick answers
Perfect when you need truth, not creativity
Reality check: Limited to actual content generation

Grok 4 - The wild card (decided not to use yet)
Best for: Real-time trends, X data, personality-driven content
Connected directly to live social data
Reality check: Still maturing, terrible for technical work

Gemini 2.5 - The Google insider
Best for: Workspace integration, SEO optimization, multimodal projects
Seamless if you're married to Google tools
Reality check: Creative output feels like a robot wrote it

DeepSeek V3.1 - The efficiency monster
Best for: Technical applications, engineering tasks
High performance at a fraction of the cost
Reality check: Weak at creative or narrative work

Here's what 732 days of building taught me:

Different models. Different superpowers.
Using ChatGPT for everything is like using a hammer for brain surgery.

The real skill isn't knowing AI exists.
It's knowing which AI to deploy when.

Your competitors are still asking, "Should I use AI?"
You're asking, "Which AI solves this specific problem?"

That gap? That's your advantage.

💭 Which LLM are you using most? And more importantly - for what?

♻️ Share if someone needs to stop treating all AI like ChatGPT
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for an AI strategy that actually works

Credit to my coach, Chris Donnelly, for the post idea and an image.

You're not stupid. AI experts just love making you feel that way.

Here's the uncomfortable truth about AI knowledge:

Every "AI expert" uses the same 50 buzzwords.
None of them can explain it to a 10-year-old.
The brutal math: Big words + No clarity = Fake expertise.

After 732 days of actually building an AI Consulting business:
Real knowledge fits on a napkin.

Here are AI Words Everyone Should Know:

Generative AI (GenAI)
↳ AI that makes brand new stuff — stories, pictures, songs, or computer code.
→ Examples: Creating cartoon characters, writing poems, making background music

LLM (Large Language Model)
↳ Super smart computer programs that can read and write like humans.
→ Examples: ChatGPT, Claude (that's me!), helpers that write code

Prompt Engineering
↳ Learning how to ask AI the right questions to get the best answers.
→ Examples: Asking clearly for homework help, creating specific pictures, getting better stories

Hallucination
↳ When AI makes up fake facts that sound like they're true.
→ Why it matters: You need to double-check important information!

Context Window
↳ How much the AI can remember from your conversation at once.
→ Think of it like: A backpack — once it's full, old stuff gets left behind

Fine-tuning
↳ Teaching a regular AI to become an expert at one special job.
→ Examples: Training AI to talk like your favourite game character or understand medical terms

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
↳ Letting AI look up fresh information instead of just using what it memorized.
→ Examples: Checking today's weather, finding the newest game updates

Multimodal AI
↳ AI that can understand pictures, words, and sounds altogether.
→ Examples: Describing photos, finding songs by humming, helping people who can't see

Tokens
↳ The tiny puzzle pieces AI breaks words into when reading.
→ Fun fact: "Pizza" might be 1 token, but "Pizzeria" might be 2!

Foundational Model
↳ The "big brain" AI that other smaller AIs are built from.
→ Think of it like: The main recipe that you can change to make different cookies

Embeddings
↳ Turning words into special number codes so AI can understand what they mean.
→ Examples: Knowing "puppy" and "dog" are related, finding similar videos

Zero-Shot Learning
↳ When AI figures out how to do something new without being taught that exact thing.
→ Examples: Translating a language it's never been studied, sorting animals that's never been seen

While you're in $5K courses learning terminology,
Someone with YouTube and courage is shipping products.

The immigrant mathematics that built my business:
PhD in AI theory = Still unemployed
2 weeks of trying stuff = Making money

Your degree won't save you.
Your willingness to look stupid will.

Every expert started as a beginner who wasn't afraid to look stupid.

💭 Which AI term scared you until you realized it was simple?

♻️ Share for someone hiding behind "it's too technical"
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI reality checks without the BS

18 months trying to transfer inside Big4 for $200 more per month.
9 months building my business, making 50x that.

The difference? I stopped waiting for someone to validate me.

At Big4, I was desperate for approval.
Someone to evaluate me. Someone to say "you're good enough."
Someone to finally say "yes, we want you."

18 months of:
"We'll review your transfer request."
"Let's revisit next quarter."
"The timing isn't right."

For $200. Per month.

The brutal math of waiting for validation:
18 months × $200 potential raise = $3,600
9 months × building my business = $180,000

I was relying on someone else.
Waiting for their evaluation. Their approval. Their permission.
Begging for scraps from their table.

Meanwhile, my skills were dying in performance review purgatory.

The immigrant mathematics of corporate vs. entrepreneurship:
Corporate: Secondary opinions determine your worth
Business: The market determines your worth

Corporate: Wait for annual reviews
Business: Get evaluated every single day

Corporate: Beg for 3% raises
Business: Raise prices when you deliver value

I spent those 18 months perfecting transfer applications.
Scheduling coffee chats. Building internal relationships.
Playing politics for a maybe.

Then I spent 9 months doing actual work.
No committees. No approval chains. No waiting.
Just bloody hard work, discipline, and clients who evaluate with their wallets.

The transfer never happened.
The $200 raise never came.
That manager who was "considering" my case? Still considering.

But those 9 months of building?
More money than 7 years of corporate raises combined.

Here's what 732 days outside Big4 taught me:

Your manager isn't evaluating your potential.
They're managing their budget.

HR isn't planning your career.
They're managing headcount.

That promotion committee isn't discussing your growth.
They're discussing their politics.

Stop waiting for someone else to tell you you're valuable.
The market already knows. It's waiting with actual money.

Take responsibility for your worth.
Do the work that matters.
Let paying clients be your performance review.

No secondary opinions needed.
No committees required.
Just you, your work, and people who appreciate value.

Every day you wait for corporate permission,
Someone with half your talent is invoicing clients.

The gap between waiting and building?
That's where freedom lives.

💭 How long have you been waiting for someone else's permission to succeed?

♻️ Share for someone still waiting for that transfer approval
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for brutal truths about escaping corporate

LinkedIn growth isn't about writing.
It's about research. And you're researching wrong.

Here's what nobody tells you:

I watched 247 creators last month pump out "research-backed" content.
Same generic prompts. Same surface-level insights.
Their engagement? Even their mom stopped liking their posts.

The immigrant mathematics of bad research:
Generic prompts + Perplexity = Generic content
Strategic prompts + Right features = Posts that actually convert

Spent 732 days testing every AI tool.
Most are BS. But Perplexity? Different beast. 
IF you know what to ask.

Here's my no-BS system for turning Perplexity into your content that people read:

YOUTUBE RESEARCH
"Find the top 5 YouTube videos on [topic]. Include: channel, date, why popular, best 2-minute timestamp."

Not "find videos about X."
Specific. Measurable. Actionable.

REDDIT PAIN DISCOVERY
"Find 10 user pain points about [PRODUCT] from Reddit after Jan 2024. Include quotes, links, and themes."

Your competitors invent problems.
You find real ones.

ACADEMIC BACKING
"List 7 cited papers after 2021 on [topic]. Include: BibTeX, open-access link, 2-line summary."

"Studies show" without specifics = a waste of time.

FACT-CHECKING THAT WORKS
"I need [specific fact] about [topic] as of [date]. Include answer, notes, and what to double-check."

The difference between looking smart and being smart.

DEEP RESEARCH MODE (Pro feature - worth it)

For company intel:
"Find top companies in [industry]. List the newest products, funding, and key hires. Export as CSV."

For custom reports:
"Act as [role]. Task: [what]. Context: [background]. Sources: [links]. Output: [format]. Style: [tone]."

Stop prompting like a tourist.
Start commanding like a strategist.

Your competitors collect information.
You're weaponizing insights.

Every Reddit complaint = Content idea
Every YouTube pattern = Proven hook
Every academic finding = Authority builder

While they're asking ChatGPT to "write a LinkedIn post,"
You're building a content machine that can't miss.

That's where thought leadership lives.

💭 Which Perplexity feature have you been sleeping on?

♻️ Share for someone still using ChatGPT for research
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI strategies that actually work

I spent 18 months looking for the perfect co-founder.
Then a nail salon owner destroyed my biggest excuse.

"I believe in myself."

That's all she said. Then hired 5 people and opened her second location.
No VC funding. No technical co-founder. No permission slip.

Meanwhile, I was collecting rejections like Pokémon cards:

"Once I find a technical co-founder..."
"When the right VC believes in my vision..."
"After I get that strategic partner..."

The immigrant math of excuses:
18 months searching for partners = 0 products shipped
3 months building alone = $47K in revenue

I wasn't looking for partners.
I was manufacturing permission to fail.

If you need someone else to believe in you first,
You don't actually believe in yourself.

Every "strategic partnership" pitch was really saying:
"Please validate me so I don't have to validate myself."

My friend with the nail salon? 
She had the same fears I did.
Same imposter syndrome. Same doubts.

The difference?
She didn't need a co-signer for her dreams.

That conversation changed everything.

Stopped pitching. Started building.
Stopped networking. Started shipping.
Stopped waiting for belief. Started creating proof.

The immigrant mathematics of self-belief:
External validation + Waiting = Sophisticated procrastination
Internal conviction + Action = Unstoppable momentum

Your competitors are still in coffee meetings with "potential partners."
You could be invoicing clients.

The gap between seeking permission and taking action?
That's where businesses actually get built.

We don't need partners to start.
We need them to scale.

But we convince ourselves it's the other way around.
Because starting alone means we can't blame anyone else.

💭 What partner are you waiting for that's really just an excuse?

♻️ Share for someone still looking for permission to begin
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for real entrepreneurship stories

I watched 200+ friends raise to executive level.

The difference wasn't talent. Or connections. Or luck.

Politics. And know how to play it. 
I spent 10 years in corporate watching these patterns.
Then 732 days building my own business from scratch.
The difference? Understanding which rules actually matter.

Most people follow rules that guarantee mediocrity.

Hustle culture. Yes-man mentality. More hours = more success.

The 1% know better. They follow 8 different laws entirely:

1. THE NORTH STAR PRINCIPLE
Clarity beats effort every time.
Know exactly where you're going or you'll end up anywhere.
I watched 50 colleagues with no direction burn out. The 3 with clear goals? All C-suite now.

2. PARKINSON'S LAW
Work expands to fill the time you give it.
That report you're spending 2 weeks on? Could be done in 2 days.
Set impossible deadlines. You'll hit most of them.

3. THE LAW OF DIMINISHING RETURNS
More hours ≠ More results.
After hour 6, you're just performing productivity theater.
The best performers know when to walk away.

4. THE PETER PRINCIPLE
People rise to their level of incompetence.
That promotion you're chasing? Might be your downfall.
Stay learning or stay stuck. There's no middle ground.

5. PARETO PRINCIPLE (80/20)
20% of your actions drive 80% of results.
Stop spreading yourself thin across 47 priorities.
Find your 20%. Double down. Ignore the rest.

6. GALL'S LAW
Complex systems evolve from simple ones.
Your 97-step business plan? Dead on arrival.
Start stupidly simple. Scale from what works.

7. THE PRINCIPLE OF LEAST EFFORT
Humans always choose the path of least resistance.
Stop fighting human nature. Use it.
Make the right choice the easy choice.

8. GOODHART'S LAW
When a measure becomes a target, it stops being useful.
Chasing LinkedIn followers? You'll get followers but no business.
Focus on real value. The metrics follow.

The immigrant mathematics of these laws:
Knowing them + Not using them = Wasted knowledge
Knowing them + Living by them = Unstoppable

While everyone's reading self-help books and grinding harder,
You're operating by laws that actually work.

That gap? That's where fortunes get built.

💭 Which law have you been following without knowing it?

♻️ Share for someone still playing by the wrong rules
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for uncomfortable realities about winning

8 laws that winners follow

Your 10-minute AI catch-up for the week

Powered by 9 wild stories. 

While everyone's scrolling AI news like it's Netflix,
I'm watching $400M deals happen in real-time.

9 Recent AI moves that actually matter:

Google Maps just got a brain transplant.
Gemini now runs your navigation. Not just directions - conversations.
"Take me somewhere quiet for lunch" actually works now.
The immigrant mathematics: Old GPS + AI brain = Maps that think.

Tinder's using AI to judge your chemistry.
They call it "AI Chemistry." I call it digital matchmaking on steroids.
Your photos? Analyzed. Your bio? Decoded.
Privacy advocates are losing their minds. Singles are getting better dates.

Anthropic says they'll hit $70B revenue by 2028.
That's not a typo. SEVENTY BILLION.
Claude is eating enterprise contracts like I ate instant noodles.
Everyone laughed at "safer AI." Nobody's laughing at those numbers.

Perplexity just married Snapchat for $400M.
Your kids' favorite app now has conversational search.
Voice-enabled discovery. Real-time insights.
While you're still Googling, Gen Z is having conversations with their search.

India gets free Gemini Pro through Jio.
Google + Reliance = 450 million people getting AI access.
Not premium. Not trial. FREE.
The brutal math: Free AI + massive market = game over for competitors.

OpenAI drops $38B on AWS cloud.
That's more than some countries' GDP.
Not for offices. Not for marketing. Just for servers.
Your ChatGPT queries? They need a small city's worth of computing power.

Figma bought Weavy. Nobody noticed.
Design tool buys AI media generation startup.
Designers can now generate, edit, collaborate in real-time.
Adobe's sweating. Canva's panicking. Figma's just shipping.

Sora hits Android. TikTok should be worried.
OpenAI's video generator is now in everyone's pocket.
Create videos with text prompts. On your phone. For free.
Every teenager becomes a filmmaker overnight.

ClickUp 4.0 launches dual AI assistants.
One manages tasks. One predicts what you need.
Slack feels ancient. Notion looks basic.
They didn't add features. They added brains.

Here's what 732 days of watching AI taught me:

These aren't product launches.
They're infrastructure shifts.

While you're debating if AI is real,
Companies are dropping GDP-sized investments.
Maps are having conversations.
Dating apps are reading your soul.

The immigrant mathematics of staying relevant:
Yesterday's innovation + Today's hesitation = Tomorrow's extinction

Your competitors are integrating these tools today.
You're still reading about them.

That gap? That's you becoming a case study in failure.

💭 Which AI move scares you most - the $38B cloud deal or Tinder reading your photos?

♻️ Repost this to help others learn AI
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI insights that actually matter

9 AI news from this week

Hustle culture lied to you.
Winners don't work harder. They work systematically without stress.

Some people win because they're lucky.
Not really. They win because they're disciplined.

I watched the same founders close every deal.
Same people. Different wins. Repeatedly.

Here's what separates opportunity magnets from everyone else:

1/ Follow up like your rent depends on it
→ Met someone? Email within 24 hours
→ Good call? Send recap immediately  
→ Someone helped? Thank them twice

2/ Your word = Your reputation
→ Promise Tuesday? Deliver Monday
→ Said you'd intro? Already done
→ Committed? First one there

3/ Show up armed
→ Know everyone's latest wins
→ Research before you arrive
→ Preparation beats charisma

4/ Make others shine
→ Share credit generously
→ Spotlight their success
→ Your win becomes theirs

5/ Fail loud, learn louder
→ Campaign tanked? Document why
→ Bad hire? Share red flags
→ Vulnerability builds trust

6/ Ask real questions
→ Not "How's business?" but "What would double revenue?"
→ Not "Any feedback?" but "What would you change?"

7/ Connect invisible dots
→ Founder needs funding, investor needs deals
→ Problem needs solving, expert has answers

8/ Ship at 70%
→ Launch messy, fix in public
→ Speed beats perfection

9/ Work backwards
→ Start with victory, reverse to today
→ Every move intentional

10/ Pick scary rooms
→ Comfortable = death
→ Intimidating = growth

11/ Create your luck
→ Attend the empty conference
→ Send the scary email
→ Take the "pointless" meeting

The immigrant mathematics:
Waiting for opportunity = Starving
Creating opportunity = Surviving  
Being the opportunity = Thriving

"Lucky" people aren't waiting for magic.
They're engineering inevitability.

While you're calling it luck,
They're calling it Tuesday.

💭 Which habit scares you because you know it works?

♻️ Share for someone waiting for their "lucky break"
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for systems that create success

11 powerful habits of people who always find 

"Vibe coding" is everywhere. But nobody talks about the impact & quality. 

Last week, I watched developers:
Team A: Vibe coded with AI tools - shipped 3 features
Team B: Traditional coding - shipped 1 feature
Both had bugs. Both needed refactoring.

The truth about vibe coding vs real coding:

VIBE CODING WINS:
Speed to prototype = 10x faster
Perfect for MVPs, demos, quick tests
Non-technical founders can actually build
$0 to working app in 2 hours

REAL CODING WINS:
Production reliability = Actually works at scale
Complex logic that AI can't handle
Security that won't get you sued
Performance that doesn't crash at 100 users

732 days of building taught me this:

Vibe coding for ideation → Real coding for implementation
AI for boilerplate → Humans for business logic
Prompts for prototypes → Code for products

The immigrant mathematics of modern development:
Pure vibe coding = Fast garbage
Pure traditional coding = Slow perfection
Strategic combination = Fast enough, good enough

When to use what – my no-BS breakdown:

VIBE CODE THIS:
Landing pages
CRUD operations
Basic automations
Content tools
Quick internal tools
Proof of concepts

REAL CODE THIS:
Payment processing
User authentication
Data privacy features
Core business logic
Anything touching money
Anything at scale

Tools everyone's talking about:
v0 by Vercel, Cursor, Bolt - Great for components
Lovable, Replit - Perfect for prototypes
Your brain + experience - Still irreplaceable

Last week's client project reality check:

Vibe coded the admin dashboard in 4 hours.
Real coded the payment system in 3 days.
Both were the right choice.

Your competitors are picking sides.
You're using both strategically.

While they debate philosophy, you're shipping products.

The harsh reality?
Vibe coding gets you to 70% fast.
That last 30% still needs real engineering.

And that gap is where businesses die or thrive.

💭 What's the most complex thing you've successfully vibe coded?

♻️ Share this to help others learn AI
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI reality checks without the BS

How to stop ChatGPT from agreeing with you:

It's annoying how GPT Adjust to your opinion. Let's stop it. 

1. Go to 'custom instructions'. 
2. Select 'enable customization'. 
2. Copy-paste this prompt below: 

"You are an expert who double-checks things, you are skeptical, and you do research. I am not always right. Neither are you, but we both strive for accuracy. Don't be afraid to disagree with me".

♻️ Share with others to help them grow
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI & Personal Growth

Everyone talks about the cost of hiring.
Nobody talks about the cost of firing.

One costs money.
The other costs everything.

I saw this trend when I automated business processes. 

I've watched 12 companies make the same mistake:
They calculate what they pay top performers.
They never calculate what top performers save them.
Until it's too late.

Lost a $150K developer. Saved the salary.
Lost $3M in delayed product launches.
Lost 2 key clients who only trusted her.
Lost the entire team's will to care.

The immigrant mathematics of talent retention:
Keeping great people = Expensive
Losing great people = Bankruptcy

THE KNOWLEDGE DRAIN:
That undocumented system, only they understood? Gone.
Those client relationships built over the years? Dead.
That tribal knowledge? Vanished.

THE MORALE MASSACRE:
Your A-players start updating LinkedIn.
"If they fired her, who's next?"
B-players pick up the slack. Burnout. Leave.
C-players stay. Because where else would they go?

THE CLIENT EXODUS:
"Where's Sarah? She always handled our account."
"Oh, she moved on. Let me introduce—"
Click. Contract cancelled.

THE MOMENTUM MURDER:
Projects stall. Deadlines slip.
6 months later: Still waiting for the new hire.
Competition: Already shipped.

Here's what 732 days of building teams taught me:

HR thinks retention is about ping pong tables.
Leaders know it's about respect.

HR thinks it's about competitive salaries.
Leaders know it's about meaningful work.

Your top performer isn't asking for perks.
They're asking: "Does my work matter here?"

And if the answer isn't obvious?
They're already gone.
You just don't know it yet.

Stop managing turnover.
Start preventing it.

Because the cost of losing great talent isn't the hiring.
It's watching your company become a place where great talent doesn't want to be.

💭 What top performer did you lose that you're still paying for?

♻️ Share for the executive still thinking people are replaceable
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for leadership & automation

Your AI bootcamp was a waste of money.
Here's what you should've learned instead.

Last week, I watched a senior developer with 15 years experience get outperformed by a junior who started coding 6 months ago.

The difference? The junior understood something the senior didn't.
AI skills aren't about memorizing ChatGPT tricks.

The brutal math of AI careers:
Perfect prompts + No fundamentals = Unemployable
Basic AI + Deep understanding = Unstoppable
Following tutorials + Missing the point = Left behind

I spent 732 days of instant noodles figuring this out.
Here's what separates AI tourists from AI natives:

1. AI FLUENCY & PROMPT ENGINEERING
Not just "write me a blog post."
Understanding model limitations. Token windows. Temperature settings.
Knowing when GPT-4 beats Claude. When Perplexity beats both.
Writing prompts that get 10x better outputs than copy-paste templates.

2. DATA-DRIVEN DECISION MAKING
Everyone has opinions. Winners have data.
→ Clean messy datasets in seconds
→ Spot patterns humans miss
→ Turn Excel chaos into insights
→ Support every decision with evidence

3. AUTOMATION THAT ACTUALLY WORKS
Stop clicking buttons like it's 1999.
→ Automate the boring stuff with n8n
→ Chain AI tools together for compound results
→ Build systems that work while you sleep
→ Focus on strategy, not repetitive tasks

4. CONTENT & MARKET INTELLIGENCE
Your competitors spend weeks on market research.
You'll do it in hours.
→ Generate visuals that don't look AI-made
→ Research competitors at 10x speed
→ Create content that sounds human
→ Understand markets before entering them

5. ETHICS & INTEGRATION
The part everyone skips. The part that matters most.
→ Know when NOT to use AI
→ Embed it naturally into workflows
→ Explain value without tech-speak
→ Build trust, not just efficiency

6. HUMAN-AI COLLABORATION
AI is your co-pilot, not your replacement.
Know when human creativity beats algorithms.
When emotional intelligence trumps artificial intelligence.
When to lead, when to leverage.

The immigrant mathematics of the future:
AI skills + Human judgment = Irreplaceable
AI skills - Understanding context = Replaceable
Fundamentals + AI amplification = Exponential growth

While everyone's collecting AI certificates,
You're building actual capabilities.

That gap? That's where careers get built or buried.

Stop learning prompts.
Start understanding systems.

💭 Which AI skill are you avoiding that could 10x your value?

♻️ Share for someone still thinking AI is just ChatGPT
➕ Follow Anna Bilan ⚡️ for AI reality checks, not hype

taplio

Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Linkedin Analytics

Anna Bilan ⚡️

Performance ScoreAnna Bilan ⚡️'s LinkedIn Performance

Who is engaging with Anna

Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Linkedin Analytics

Anna Bilan ⚡️

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Anna Bilan ⚡️'s LinkedIn Performance

Who is engaging with Anna

Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreAnna Bilan ⚡️'s LinkedIn Performance

Anna Bilan ⚡️'s Best Posts (last 30 days)