Helping technical experts & product specialists improve their win rate on pitches. 829 clients helped to-date with training that had an immediate, positive impact on their results. Will you be next?

👩 Hello!  My name is Mary Beth and I help technical experts & product specialists improve their win rate on sales pitches by leveraging a 34-year-old template ➡ www.PitchWinMultiplier.com ⬅

Imagine tripling your sales pitch win rate. Sound good? Then, you're in exactly the right spot.

Who Am I?

I've spent over 25 years in corporate sales, navigating through senior roles at juggernauts like JPMorgan Chase, PwC, and Commerzbank. My journey has been more than a career; it's been a deep dive into the art of persuasive communication and sales strategy.

What I Do

🌎 Global Seminars: I've globe-trotted, teaching over 9,000 delegates the art of 'Pitching to Win' with a proven, 34-year-old template.

👥 Executive Coaching: Personal coach to 157 C-Suite executives, transforming their presentation skills into undeniable assets.

💡 Psychological Insights: Leveraging my background as an NLP Master Practitioner, Psychologist, and Hypnotherapist to unlock the secrets of persuasive communication.

How Can I Help You?

🔑 Unlocking Pitch Potential: Transform your pitches from good to unforgettable, making every word count and every moment resonate.

🎯 Tailored Strategies: Customized coaching that addresses your unique challenges and goals, ensuring you stand out in the crowded marketplace.

💡 Psychological Edge: Dive deep into the psychology of persuasion, learning how to connect, convince, and convert with ease.

Why Choose Me?

✅ Proven Experience: 25+ years in high-stakes sales environments.

✅ Global Recognition: 450+ glowing recommendations and a worldwide teaching footprint.

✅ Psychological Mastery: Unique insights into the human mind, enhancing how your messages are received and acted upon.

Let's Talk Results

⭐ Increased Win Rates: Aim to triple your success in closing deals through impactful pitches.

⭐ Engagement Boost: Captivate your audience, keeping them engaged and eager to act.

⭐ Long-Term Partnerships: Turn one-time pitches into ongoing relationships, driving sustained business growth.

Ready to Transform Your Pitches?

If you're looking to elevate your sales game, to not just participate in the market but dominate it, let's connect. Together, we'll unlock the full potential of your sales pitches, ensuring you lead the pack.

Your journey to sales pitch mastery starts here. Let's make those pitches not just heard, but unforgettable. 

✅ Are you in?  If so, check this out: ➡ www.PitchWinMultiplier.com ⬅

Templates won't save your presentations.

I know. I sell templates.

But here's the truth:

A template gives you structure. It doesn't teach you why that structure works.

- It doesn't show you how to adapt when your CEO throws a curveball. 
- It doesn't help you read the room and pivot mid-slide. 
- It doesn't build the muscle memory that makes you confident under pressure.

Templates are training wheels. At some point, you need to learn to ride the bike.

After 24 years in financial services at JPMorgan, PwC, RBS, and Commerzbank—plus 15 years teaching presentation skills—I've seen the difference:

→ Template users plateau → Trained presenters compound

That's why I built my course: AI-Enhanced Presentation Mastery.

It's not about downloading files. It's about developing skills—with Copilot as your co-pilot.

When you bring coaching and training together with templates, you create the space to actually excel.

Link in comments 👇

Mary Beth Hazeldine

Executive Presentation Coach | PowerPoint Copilot Expert | 24 yrs JPMorgan, PwC, RBS, Commerzbank | Presentations that get results

I watched a private equity associate waste his entire Sunday rebuilding a pitch deck.

The deal? £85 million acquisition. The deadline? Monday 8am partner review.

He had Copilot. He had all the data. He had 36 hours.

He still ended up at 2am manually fixing fonts, chasing rogue bullet points, and copy-pasting the same disclaimer onto 47 slides.

I know this pain intimately. 24 years in financial servies — JPMorgan, PwC, RBS, Commerzbank — I've been that person staring at a screen at midnight wondering why the technology that was supposed to save me time is somehow making everything worse.

Here's what nobody tells you about Microsoft Copilot for PowerPoint:

It's not broken. You're just prompting it like it's a search engine.

"Make this slide better" → rubbish output
"Fix the formatting" → chaos

But when you understand how AI actually thinks?

Same tool. 75% time savings. Decks that don't need 45 minutes of brand cleanup.

I've spent 8 months testing every Copilot update on real client work — investment banking pitches, M&A books, board presentations with those terrifying compliance requirements.

The November 2025 update finally fixed the brand consistency nightmare. I tested it on a corporate banking deck with notoriously strict guidelines. Before: 42 minutes of cleanup. After: 8 minutes.

I've documented everything — the prompts that actually work, the workflows, the mistakes that waste your time — in a tutorial I keep updated monthly.

If you're in financial services and Copilot isn't saving you hours yet, this will change that.

Link in comments 👇

Curious — what's your biggest Copilot frustration right now? Mine was the fonts. Always the fonts.

#MicrosoftCopilot #PowerPoint #FinancialServices #InvestmentBanking #Productivity

Most executive presentations fail in the first 5 slides.

Not because the content is wrong.

Because they're built backwards.

After 24 years at JPMorgan, PwC, RBS, and Commerzbank, I've reviewed thousands of board decks and investor pitches.

The difference between funded and forgotten?

Usually comes down to structure, not substance.

Here are the 3 mistakes that kill executive presentations:

1.  Burying the lead - If your recommendation is on slide 15, you've already lost. Executives check out by slide 5.

2.  Label titles instead of message titles -  "Q3 Financial Results" tells me nothing. "Q3 Revenue Up 12% Despite Market Headwinds" tells me everything.

3.  Missing the decision - Every slide should answer: what do you need from me?

I've just published a complete guide covering:
→ The 10 executive presentation types you'll use throughout your career
→ Exact structures for each (QBR, budget request, board meeting, strategic recommendation)
→ A 60-second slide check used by investment bankers
→ AI prompts that turn 2-hour presentations into 30-minute tasks

Link in comments 👇

Your slide has 3 seconds.

That's how long an executive spends deciding whether to keep reading or check their email.

Most slides fail this test instantly.

Here's the 60-second check I run before every executive presentation:

1. Can I explain this slide in ONE sentence? If not, split it or simplify it.

2. Is the "so what" obvious? Your audience should never wonder why they're seeing this.

3. Would my CEO understand this without me talking? Slides get forwarded. They need to stand alone.

4. Is there ONE clear takeaway? Multiple messages = no message.

5. Does the title tell the story? Not "Q3 Results" but "Q3 Revenue Up 12% Despite Market Headwinds"

6. Have I removed everything non-essential? Every element should earn its place.

After 24 years at JPMorgan, PwC, RBS, and Commerzbank, I've watched executives tune out of thousands of presentations.

The ones that got results? Passed all 6 questions.

Print this checklist. Use it before every presentation. It takes 60 seconds and catches 90% of problems.

Full breakdown + examples in comments 👇

A director at a FTSE 250 company blocked his entire Saturday for a board presentation.

12 slides. 8 hours planned.

By 3pm, he was 6 hours in and only on slide 9.

The formatting kept breaking. The charts looked amateur. His wife wasn't happy.

Two weeks later, he built a similar deck in 41 minutes.

Same quality. Same professionalism. Different approach.

The difference wasn't a magic tool. It was learning to use AI properly.

Most executives treat Copilot like a fancy autocomplete:
→ "Create a presentation about Q4"
→ Get generic slides
→ Spend 3 hours fixing them manually

That's backwards.

The executives saving 70%+ of their time do three things differently:

1. They brief AI like a junior analyst (context, audience, constraints)
2. They know what AI should handle vs. what humans do best
3. They iterate WITH AI, not after AI

One prompt. Refine. Another prompt. Refine. Done.

The 6-hour deck becomes a 45-minute deck.

Not because AI is magic.

Because you learned how to use it.

I've trained 200+ executives on this approach. The pattern is always the same: they're working too hard because no one taught them the right method.

What's your current process for building presentations? Still doing it the old way, or have you cracked the AI code?

An £84 million deal.

Lost.

Not because of the financials. Not because of the strategy.

Because the banking team spent 18 hours rebuilding their pitch deck instead of rehearsing their delivery.

The competing bank closed the deal with a tighter deck, stronger delivery, and half the preparation time.

I watched this happen at a major UK clearing bank. And it changed how I think about presentation workflows in investment banking.

Here's what most PowerPoint Copilot guides get wrong:

They tell bankers to "create engaging presentations with compelling visuals."

That advice will get you fired in investment banking.

Banking presentations aren't about engagement. They're about precision, defensibility, and regulatory compliance.

Using the wrong shade of blue at my old bank could delay board approval for weeks. A junior banker nearly tanked a £120M acquisition because Copilot rounded a debt-to-equity ratio to 3.2 when the actual figure was 3.247.

Generic AI prompts don't understand:

→ 47-page brand guidelines that treat PMS 280 vs PMS 281 as a compliance violation
→ Financial figures that need auditable precision, not approximate charts
→ Regulatory language that can't be "simplified" without legal consequences
→ Credit committees who expect information in a specific sequence

I spent 24 years in corporate banking at JPMorgan Chase, PwC, Royal Bank of Scotland, and Commerzbank.

Now I help banking teams save 60-70% on pitch deck creation while maintaining the precision deals require.

I've put everything into a complete playbook: tested prompts, brand compliance workflows, Excel integration techniques, and real case studies from live deals.

If you're creating 2-5 pitch decks weekly and want those hours back for actual deal work, this is for you.

Link in the first comment.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 £𝟒𝟕,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐭 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬

A COO sat across from me, furious.

"We spent £47,000 on Copilot licenses. Adoption after 6 months? 11%."

Her CFO wanted to cancel everything.

I asked one question: "Did you calculate ROI before or after rollout?"

Silence.

Here's what I've learned from 23 Copilot implementations:

The companies that fail never measured.

The companies that succeed document everything.

𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐎𝐈 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐦𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬:
→ Investment bank M&A team: 6,760% ROI
→ Biotech exec team: 6,150% ROI
→ Management consultancy: 5,852% ROI

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚 𝐂𝐅𝐎𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞:
(Hours Saved × Hourly Rate × Annual Decks × Team Size) - License Cost = Net Value

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟒 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬 𝐈 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞:
1️⃣ No baseline measurement (78% of companies)
2️⃣ Generic training instead of industry-specific prompts
3️⃣ Expecting magic instead of building systems
4️⃣ No accountability for tracking results

That same COO?

Her team now has 89% adoption.

First-year savings exceeded £340,000.

The CFO became Copilot's biggest champion.

The difference wasn't the tool.

It was a 30-minute ROI calculation.

Bottom line: The question isn't "Is Copilot worth £360/person?"
It's "Can you afford NOT to know?"

P.S. I've written the complete guide to calculating and proving your Copilot PowerPoint ROI—including the exact CFO presentation template that's worked 17 times.

Link in comments 👇

♻️ Repost if this could help someone justify their tech investment.
💡 Follow Mary Beth Hazeldine for AI presentation insights that actually work.

PowerPoint Copilot is the most overhyped tool in Microsoft 365.

It's also massively underutilised.

Here's the thing: I've tested Copilot on 100+ real client presentations. Not demos with perfect data. Board decks. Investor pitches. QBRs with messy content and 48-hour deadlines.

Most people try it once, get generic garbage, and quit.

That's because they're using it wrong.

What Copilot actually does brilliantly: 
→ Turns a 30-page Word doc into a presentation draft in 60 seconds 
→ Organises your chaotic bullet points into logical slides 
→ Polishes wordy text faster than any human editor 
→ Generates speaker notes you'd actually use

What it does terribly: 
→ Creating presentations from nothing (you get corporate nonsense) 
→ Design and visual layout (mediocre at best) 
→ Data visualisation choices (default everything) 
→ Industry-specific content without guidance

The problem isn't the tool. It's expecting magic from vague prompts.

"Create a presentation about Q3 results" gives you trash.

"Create a 5-slide presentation for our CMO about Q3 marketing results. She needs to decide whether to increase Q4 budget. Include: headline results, channel performance, ROI analysis, recommendation. Tone: confident, data-driven, concise."  That gives you something usable.

The secret? Copilot is an accelerator, not a strategist.

You bring the thinking. It brings the speed.

Full breakdown (what works, what doesn't, and the exact prompts I use with banking and biotech clients)... link in the comments.

The biggest mistake I see in board presentations:

Burying the ask on slide 15.

After 24 years in banking and 15 years with Winning Presentations, I've watched executives with brilliant ideas fail because they built suspense like a Netflix drama.

Boards don't want suspense. They want answers.

Here's what I learned sitting in boardrooms where £50 million decisions were made:

Board members are scanning for 3 things:
→ What do you want?
→ What will it cost?
→ What's the return?

If they can't find these in 10 seconds, you've already lost them.

The fix is counterintuitive:

Put your recommendation on slide 1. Not your agenda. Not your introduction. Not "context setting."

Your ask.

Everything after that is supporting evidence.

I once saw a proposal get deferred twice. Same content. Same board.

The third time? The presenter moved the ask to slide 1.

Approved unanimously.

The content didn't change. The structure did.

---

What's the most frustrating presentation feedback you've ever received?

I'll share my worst one in the comments 👇

taplio

Mary Beth Hazeldine's Linkedin Analytics