After more than two decades of investing...
I believe we’ve found the next big hidden opportunity:


Most LPs exploring venture capital funds as an investment vehicle are concerned with media sentiment.

"Capital at risk"
"Growth at all costs"
"Long-term"

The numbers don't lie. If well managed, venture investing reaps very attractive ROI versus most other alternatives.

And, you won't even need to find the next unicorn to do that.

Today, sustainable, sticky growth is the holy grail for any investment office looking for longevity with attractive returns.

Some years ago my partner, Murli, and I started Tin Men Capital in pursuit of that.

Our fund's unique focus:
- B2B and Enterprise Tech Startups
- With a strong focus in Southeast Asia
- Who are in Series A stage and beyond

Our thesis:
SouthEast Asia's legacy industries are still largely undigitised.
B2B tech in large TAM > High-gross margins > Sticky recurring revenue > Quicker pathway to profitability

We've already proven that these ideas our sound with measured results from our inaugural fund.

Family offices and institutions that work with us appreciate our ethos in running the fund:

⚙️ DISCIPLINED DEAL-SOURCING : 
Carefully scrutinising every deal for the right valuations, founder mix, and expertise. No exceptions.

⚙️ HIGH-CONVICTION: 
We only invest in a handful of teams that apply. Sounds counterintuitive, but It's seeing above-market returns with below-average failure rates.

⚙️ EXPERIENCED B2B OPERATORS AT THE HELM: 
Murli and I bring collectively more than 40 years of experience in investing and management, having sat on boards and brokered large M&As. Our thoughts have also been featured on TechInAsia, Peak Magazine, and more.

Some of our portfolio companies:

🔵 Hubble (Series B)
Resource management platform for parties in the construction value chain to track and optimise processes

🔵  Zipline (Series A)
Australia's #1 workplace management platform for the aged care and health sectors

🔵  GlobalTix (Series A)
Software and marketplace software for tourism attraction operators and travel product distributors 

We’re always on the lookout for new partners and startups to join us.

If keen to chat, shoot me a DM/email or head over to our website to drop us a line.

Hepmil’s exit has been in the headlines for weeks.

They just minted a 20x win in SEA.
Yet, many people are asking the wrong questions.

A homegrown SEA company acquired by Publicis Groupe.
Its earliest angels reportedly walked away with 20x+ returns.
That doesn’t happen often in our region.

Interestingly, in offline circles, many were quick to focus on “how much.”

I think the first instinct should be simpler:
🔸Celebrate the success.

A win for a homegrown company is a win for the ecosystem.
And this one carries an important signal.

It shows younger, aspiring founders:
You don’t need to build a unicorn to build something meaningful.

Too many give up because they feel they can’t match the glamorous stories they see online.

Hepmil built a business that achieved a very respectable exit.
It also nudges the ecosystem toward something we need more of.

Confidence in M&A as a viable exit pathway.

Selfishly as a VC, I hope this encourages more people to take the leap.
To build, to create jobs, and to bring new growth back to the region.

Will every company be VC-backable?
Probably not.

And that’s perfectly fine.

Every solid company created, VC-funded or not, adds resilience to SEA’s economy .

We should celebrate that.
And we should still encourage them to try.

A win is still a win.
And the ecosystem needs many more of them.

Jeremy Tan

Talks about #startup, #investing, #fundraising, #familyoffice, and #venturecapital

Backing brilliant B2B founders 🦓 in Southeast Asia | Co-founder at Tin Men Capital | Linkedin Top Voice

I hesitate each time someone asks me for career advice.

Just last week, we had a team lunch to thank our intern who’s finishing up her time at Tin Men Capital.

She asked me,
“What do you think I should do?”
“What would you do if you were me?”

This is NOT the first time I get these questions.
But it still gives me pause.

Because what I hear is someone looking for the answer.
A formula.
A truth to copy and treat as gospel.

That scares me.
Reality is life doesn’t work like that.

Each person's life and path is unique.

↳ Different opportunities and social backgrounds 
↳ Personal loves, dislikes, and motivations 
↳ Life events that happen at different times

Context, timing, and opportunities all differ.
What’s right for one may be completely wrong for another.

Over time, I’ve only found a few things that hold true. 

What I told her:
🔹 Life will throw you curveballs. Play the cards you’re dealt and adapt. 
🔹 Gratitude is the gateway to happiness. 
🔹 Priorities and desires change with time. 
🔹 Pay attention to global shifts. Macro forces often shape personal outcomes. 
🔹 When you take advice, listen for the context behind it.

In the end, being able to choose your own path is a privilege in itself.
The rest is just figuring out how to make it work for you.

I still don’t have perfect advice.
But maybe that’s the point.
No one should.

The best any of us can do is stay curious.
Stay adaptable.

Keep building a life that makes sense to us.

To me, that’s how we end up in fulfilling careers and more importantly a happy life.

Agree?

Tin Men Capital

Tuan Le

Back from the SWITCH 2025 event. 
It’s been a solid few days.

Always good to see the regional ecosystem in motion again.
And seeing it on the ground.

I look forward to attending Singapore Week of Innovation and Technology (SWITCH) each year for this reason.

At a time when the region is going through a reset,
It’s great to see Singapore continuing to set the benchmark,
Especially in how it keeps investing in the ecosystem.

You could feel it across the floor.
Founders still showing up.
They are still building and staying focused on what matters.

Many of the conversations this week felt different.

More restraint.
More discipline.
More awareness of what it really takes to build for Southeast Asia.

Despite the challenges, there’s a steady sense of purpose.
The ones still here know what they’re building toward,
And how to make it work in this region.

The reset feels like a healthy filter.

The not-so-serious founders and investors are slowly fading out.
What’s left are people who are in this for the long term.

Grateful to be support again this year from the judging panel.
Big thank you to Cindy Khoo , Emily Liew, Sophia Ng at Enterprise Singapore.

Till next year!

--

📸 Photo 1: From the networking party with Minister Jeffrey Siow. 
📸 Photo 2: From the judging panel.

I just got into KL.

The last time we were here together was five years ago,
Right after we led Hubble’s Series A at Tin Men Capital

We flew in to meet a co-investor and closed the round on that trip.

When we headed back to Singapore in Feb 2020,
We didn’t know it would be our last time travelling for a while.

Today, I got to travel with SJ Lin again.
We chose to drive in this time.

It’s cathartic to spend some quality, uninterrupted catching up and dreaming up the future of Hubble.Build.
Five years felt like a lifetime.

A pandemic.
A funding winter.
More ups and downs than we expected.

And I’m thankful for the friendship and partnership we’ve built through all of it.

I’ve learnt a lot from founders like SJ.
I admire the way they stay steady under pressure, even when the environment is tough.

This time, we’re meeting investors and customers.
Wish us luck.

Hello KL, looking forward to building with you!

Singapore was built to avoid failure.
But our progress - our very survival depends on it.

Yet, we still treat failure like a scar.
Here, it’s partly culturally ingrained.

We were raised on the idea that we’re a small island,
With no resources and can’t afford to fail.

That mindset made sense when survival was top priority.

But over time, it manifested into something else.
A quiet fear of getting things wrong.

Across the region, failure is viewed very different.

In Malaysia, for instance.
Many built their businesses without the safety nets we have.

No government backing.
No currency stability.
No guaranteed support.

For them, the only path was forward.
Failure wasn’t shameful.

It was part of the process.

I’ve seen the same pattern with founders too.
The resilient ones study their missteps.
Every failed pilot, missed forecast, or wrong hire becomes data for the next decision.

That rhythm of trial and error builds staying power over time.

We should see it that way.
Failure can be a stepping stone to greater things.

It's proof of learning.
It's a showcase of progress in motion.

Don't shy from failure. Accept it as a part of the journey.

---
🎧 From Unfair Advantage with myco-founder Murli Ravi
(a Tin Men Capital Podcast)

We bring voices from across the ecosystem to understand what drives the region’s B2B growth.

Now streaming on all major podcast platforms: 
🟢 Spotify: https://lnkd.in/gEig_89f 
⚪️ Apple Podcasts: https://lnkd.in/gECJhtSS
🔴 YouTube: https://lnkd.in/g8bfShYA

Last week, I had the privilege of meeting several KL-based founders over drinks.
I came away genuinely excited.

They possessed this maturity, grit, and quiet confidence.
A quiet confidence powered by their conviction: 
“I’ll focus on what works, instead of chasing valuations or unicorn labels.”

I’ve always felt that the lack of a “safety net” is a crucible that forges strong founder mentality.

And you see this in many of Malaysia’s homegrown companies.
Sunway, Dialog Group, OSK.

I can’t wait to see the next crop of founders rising from Malaysia.
From what I’ve seen, the ones I met are already setting the pace for their tech ecosystem.

This headline regarding Tin Men Capital made the news recently:

“Forget the unicorn — the US$50 million exit is the new Southeast Asia dream.”
There was a lot more nuance to it in the podcast episode.

In our pilot episode of Unfair Advantage:

❌ We are not looking for US$50M exits specifically.

But addressing the size of exits that our region supports in its current state for the following reasons:

🔸 Markets are more fragmented.
🔸 Capital efficiency matters a lot more given size of outcomes.
🔸 IPO markets are not yet developed.
🔸 M&A are main driver of exits.

This region works differently.

In that context, US$50M to US$200M exit are outcomes supported by the current markets.

The region is sorely in need of repeatable exits to kickstart the self-sustaining capital stack.

We are pushing for more in the years ahead.
As the region raises a new generation of founders who will capitalise when markets shift and break the ceiling.

Thank you Tech in Asia for covering our first episode.
Our team definitely did not expect media coverage from the get-go.

That’s exactly why we keep telling our story.
So the builders can hear it straight from us.

I unpack our firm's journey over the last 8 years and our views of SEA with my Co-founder Murli Ravi.

🎧 Hear our full views in our Unfair Advantage podcast.
Links to both the episode and article are in the comments.

I’ll be in KL, Malaysia this week - looking to connect with founders/ investors.

Tin Men Capital will host a casual networking drinks session on Wednesday evening. (19th November)

I’ll be sharing some thoughts about the evolving Southeast Asia startup ecosystem with a focus on the big part Malaysia plays in it.

It’ll be a great opportunity to trade insights and stories with other folks in the space to learn and unwind. 

You’ll get to hear from both founders on the ground and investors to get a pulse of where things are heading.

Possibly get inspired on new directions before the year’s out to set 2026 strong.

I expect some really great conversations and a fun evening.

Will be joined by a friend: First Move’s GP - Audra Pakalnyte.

There are limited slots - so I’d recommend applying early.
(Will attach the link in the comments.)

Looking forward to seeing you there!

Founders, don’t trade “nice” for “formidable.”

You can be both.

Mean founders might win once.
Nice founders win every round after.

I’ve been around this ecosystem long enough to see both.

Some founders think you need to squeeze every deal, underpay talent, or push for harsh terms to get ahead.
Some are unnecessarily antagonistic.

And yes, they might capture a little value in the moment.

But over time, it backfires.

In startups, the game is compounding.
🔸Company value ≈ Initial value × (1 + growth rate)^t

Shave a little off your growth rate every time you mistreat a hire, frustrate a partner, or shortchange a customer.
And those “wins” quickly turn into losses.

On the flip side, I’ve seen founders who:
✅ Pay fairly and on time
✅ Fix customer problems without excuses
✅ Treat partners like long-term allies

They build reputations that compound.

Hiring gets easier.
Deals close faster.
Investors lean in.

And in Southeast Asia, backchannels travel faster than revenue.
Your reputation is often the first due diligence that gets done.

The point isn’t to be “soft.”
Or to just to protect your growth rate.
It’s more basic than that.

Really, just don’t be a jerk.

Being decent should be the default.
Being formidable makes it  even more powerful.

That combination wins almost every time.
That’s how you compound.

What goes around comes around. 
Costs nothing to be nice.

Ingrained in Tin Men Capital's mission is to play a key role in building a thriving eco-system.

For SEA and for many generations to come.

It is that north star that fuel's Murli and my conviction and provides light at the darkest moment.

Earlier this week, I had the great pleasure of being invited to a small VC roundtable led by MOS Dinesh Vasu Dash,
together with other Singapore-based VCs.

We were invited to share views on the recommendations being shaped for the Economic Strategy Review.

I hope the candid views of all the VCs attending is useful for the policymakers in attendance.

Stoked that we can play a part in shaping vital policies.

What I appreciated most was how seriously the government is taking this role.
And I hope we’ll see more of these discussions happening even after the recommendations are announced and rolled out.

If we want founders to feel confident building here,
The right policies and financial infrastructure need to be in place, with frequent calibrations.

Whilst we are going through a reset now, we are starting at a higher base and that should be celebrated.

And I’m optimistic.

I believe we’ll get there at a much faster pace, with Singapore well-positioned to lead.

Big thanks to MOS Dinesh, Cindy Khoo, Heng-Tong CHOO, Emily Liew, Alvin Cai for the kind invitation.

And great catching up with friendly faces too:
Jixun Foo, Edgar Hardless, Arrif Ziaudeen, Jeremy Loh PhD Shailendra J Singh, B. Paul Santos and Dickson Loo.

Onwards!

Valuation is not validation. 
It never was.

Years ago, I found myself increasingly irritated by one thing:
SEA’s obsession with unicorns.

At the height of the last VC boom, we started treating valuation as validation.
If you weren’t a unicorn, you weren’t “winning.”

That mindset did real damage.

It really pressured founders to grow at all cost.
Pushing investors to raise too much capital and overpay.

Worse, the ecosystem began to equate success with size.
And apply a playbook unsuitable for this region.

A billion-dollar label does NOT make a company valuable.

The irony is, some of those “unicorns” weren’t built on the strongest foundations.
They grew fast, often without the fundamentals to sustain it.
Burning through capital and momentum along the way.

Then the layoffs and contagion ensues.

What’s worth celebrating are quieter, steadier outcomes.

Founders who build sustainable businesses.
Teams that get acquired / exited for the right reasons.
Companies that scale responsibly and stay alive through cycles.

Those outcomes compound.
Exits brings about DPI and capital recycling.
They build the foundation of a resilient ecosystem.

Years later, that obsession has started to fade.
And that’s a good thing.

I’m much more optimistic now.
With our region setting up better benchmarks,
And founders embracing audacity and confidence to build for this region.

It’s a healthier kind of ambition.
That’s what will define this next cycle.

—
P.S. This is a snippet from our Unfair Advantage podcast. 

🎧 Now streaming on all major podcast platforms:
🟢 Spotify: https://lnkd.in/gEig_89f
⚪️ Apple Podcasts: https://lnkd.in/gECJhtSS
🔴 YouTube: https://lnkd.in/g8bfShYA

They say Cash is the lifeblood of any startup. There's a good reason why.

As the ecosystem matures, founders have become much more financially aware.

They’re reading their numbers better.
Tracking recurring revenue, churn, ACV, margins.
That progress matters.

But I still meet teams who aren't as aware of cashflow management.

Take this example:

🔸A company doing $10M ARR, growing 100% YoY, with 80% gross margins.
Everything looked solid.

🔸Then the finance lead pulled up their collections report.
Only $2M had been collected at the gross profit level.

🔸Most customers paid every six months, with 90-day terms.
Several invoices were still overdue.

✅The books said healthy growth.
❌The bank account told another story.

This is probably an extreme example, but the point still stands.

Cashflow management may seem as a afterthought as we prioritise booking revenue,
Yet it often decides survival.

-Trading off contract size for faster payments
-Appointing someone accountable for collections
-Negotiating better terms with suppliers

Each move compounds over time.

More predictability.
More breathing room.
More control.

Good cash discipline rarely makes headlines. 
That is… until you run out of money.

But it keeps companies alive long enough to earn them.

Cash is king.
Founders should treat it that way.

Several years ago, I attended a course that asked us to “be unreasonable.”
That didn’t sit well with me at first.

In my upbringing, being “unreasonable” meant being difficult.
But that was NOT what they meant.

Starting a company is not for the faint-hearted.
It is REASONABLE for most people to not try, or to give up.

If you want to be a constructive disruptor and a changemaker, you have to be UNREASONABLE.

If we want different results, we have to take unreasonable actions.

Becoming an entrepreneur helped me understand this fully.
And embrace it.

I know many of us are going through a tough time right now.
For the trailblazers out there, you know who you are, keep going:

🧲 Make that cold call you’ve been dreading
🧲 Open your mouth and ask for the funding you need
🧲 Quit that job (the safety blanket) that’s holding you back

What’s one UNREASONBLE action you can take today?

Founders, treat CVCs like customers.

CVCs can be powerful partners when the pieces line up.

Distribution.
Credibility.
A foot in markets that usually take years to enter.

But the results vary a lot. It is a double-edge sword.

I’ve seen some founders scale faster than they expected.
And others spend months navigating internal changes, shifting priorities, or unclear ownership.

The difference usually comes down to alignment.

Alignment also comes later when you're "clearer" on product direction.
That is why we advise founders to accept CVC capital at a later stage.
In the meantime, start with commercial collaboration; get to know each other.

Does someone inside the corporate truly own the outcome?
Are incentives matched on both sides?
Is the pilot scoped with real resources?

That’s why I often tell founders:
Treat CVCs as commercial partners first, investors second.

Pilot → Proof → Paper.

Start small.
Test how they move.
Make sure the value you’re getting matches the effort you’re putting in.

The right partnership can compound your growth.
And the wrong one can quietly slow it down.

We built a simple framework to sense-check this:

✅ Champion map 
✅ Pilot scope 
✅ Optionality safeguards 
✅ Governance hygiene

Found this post useful? Save it for later.
Any questions on corporate rounds? Leave them in the comments.

Check These 4 Things Before Partnering A Corporate VC

For years, we’ve glorified one outcome for startups of any size.

Going public. Listing on a major stock exchange.

I get why this was the case.
It’s what most of us grew up reading about.

The glorious bell-ringing and confetti.
Those splashy headlines.
It felt like the mark of success.

But Southeast Asia doesn’t quite work that way.

Public liquidity lives offshore.
Markets are much more fragmented.
It takes longer to build scale needed for IPO.

Trouble is, when everything revolves around IPOs as the only option,
Other good outcomes get overlooked.

Founders keep building for windows that don’t open.
Funds hold on for longer than they should.
And solid M&A paths get ignored, even when they make perfect sense.

The truth is, M&A has driven a significant part of returns .

Done right, it rewards founders, recycles talent and capital,
And keeps momentum in the ecosystem.

We don’t talk about it enough, because it’s less flashy.
But we’re seeing it start to take off.

What would help now are doable fixes.

Building bridges with acquirers' corp dev team.
Cleaner cap tables.
Shift in local corporate mindset of "I will build it myself"

None of that’s out of reach.

We don’t need to chase Silicon Valley’s version of success.
We can design our own.

With the founders and investors already here,
Building outcomes that actually fit this region.

How do you define a good outcome in SEA today?

Startups may hit a point where growth stalls.

Over the years, we realised these 10 habits are important to keep going.

They look small on paper, but they compound quietly over time.
The ones that grow steadily stay close to the work.

They test how money comes in before expanding ops.

1/ Sell first to understand the buyer.
2/ Track usage and retention early, even when the data’s messy.
3/ Stay close to customers long after the first few hires.

And through it all, they protect efficiency.

Short payback cycles, tight pilots, careful hiring.

Different markets. Different models.
Same discipline.

In Southeast Asia, where markets are diverse, steadiness and discipline often beats speed.
Consistency stands out when the noise fades.

Founders who build that rhythm early tend to weather tougher seasons better.
And sometimes, the smallest changes are everything.

A shorter pilot.
A closer loop.
A clearer payback target.

If you’re still finding your footing, the full cheatsheet below can help you sense-check your focus.

📎 Save this post for later.

taplio

Jeremy Tan's Linkedin Analytics

Jeremy Tan

Performance ScoreJeremy Tan's LinkedIn Performance

What is Jeremy talking about?

Who is engaging with Jeremy

Jeremy Tan's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Jeremy Tan's Linkedin Analytics

Jeremy Tan

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Jeremy Tan's LinkedIn Performance

What is Jeremy talking about?

Who is engaging with Jeremy

Jeremy Tan's Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Jeremy Tan's Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreJeremy Tan's LinkedIn Performance

Jeremy Tan's Best Posts (last 30 days)